[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic genitalia and falsifiability

2009-05-16 Thread at_man_and_brahman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, at_man_and_brahman

[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic genitalia and falsifiability

2009-05-16 Thread at_man_and_brahman
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, at_man_and_brahman Bobananda, it really is true. And, everyone has been correct that the book is packed with correlations just something Vedic and something bodily have the same number of parts. I meant to say, ...correlations *that* something Vedic

[FairfieldLife] Re: Vedic genitalia and falsifiability

2009-05-16 Thread guyfawkes91
TN's book lacks falsifiability. How can any claim in it be proven wrong? FWIW, not that anyone should even bother to give it a moments thought, there are statements that are open to falsification. In fact they're pretty easy to falsify. Take the example that the structure of DNA, a molecule