[FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-27 Thread Larry
Let's take the question: Who are you and what do you really do? The domain in which the question is asked, is the same domain in which it is answered. That domain does not go away, it is not diminished, that domain does not become dishonest. Only in the context of an ever-expanding self does

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-26 Thread Angela Mailander
Sandi Ego wrote (snipped): witnessing is nothing more than the first glimpses of ceding the individual ego to the cosmic ego. after awhile the cosmic ego predominates and the individual ego disappears. just as you said, it is all a matter of integration. The companion of silence which

[FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-26 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:

[FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-26 Thread curtisdeltablues
snip Answer to Rick's post: Me: I think your example illustrates that the usefulness of these states is context dependent. In a situation like you mentioned, a detached silence is a real asset. But I believe that this state is not useful for making love. Rick: Our difference is that you

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-26 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of curtisdeltablues Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:17 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington snip Answer to Rick's post: Me: I think your

[FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-25 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Witnessing is not a dissassociative state in which different aspects of the personality are fragmented from one another. It's a natural experience that arises when the silent aspect of life is open to awareness

[FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-25 Thread curtisdeltablues
It was as though I were in deep meditation throughout the whole dynamic, noisy experience. Not withdrawn or passive in the least – just imperturbable. I'm glad you weighed in Rick. I think your example illustrates that the usefulness of these states is context dependent. In a situation

[FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-25 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote: Witnessing is not a dissassociative state in which different aspects of the personality are fragmented from one another. It's a natural experience

[FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-25 Thread Stu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote: Witnessing is not a dissassociative state in which different aspects of the personality are fragmented from one another. It's a natural experience

[FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-25 Thread ruthsimplicity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote: Witnessing is not a dissassociative state in which different aspects of the

[FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-25 Thread abutilon108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just finding myself more like Curtis these days, open to *many* different interpretations of experiences that I once saw only one interpretation of -- the one I had been taught to consider the only interpretation.

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-25 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of curtisdeltablues Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:40 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington It was as though I were in deep meditation throughout

[FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-25 Thread sandiego108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of curtisdeltablues Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:40 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-25 Thread Angela Mailander
: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington It was as though I were in deep meditation throughout the whole dynamic, noisy experience. Not withdrawn or passive in the least – just imperturbable. I'm glad you weighed in Rick. Sorry I don’t have time to follow the discussion

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington

2008-02-25 Thread Angela Mailander
: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of curtisdeltablues Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:40 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve Martin of Wilmington It was as though I were in deep meditation