Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-05 Thread Peter
--- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shemp wrote: > > Although your last two paragraphs get a bit flaky, > > > Richard, I have to say this is one of the best > damn > > posts you've ever done. > > > Thanks Shemp, but the last paragraph still stands. > > > > Franky, Peter, I'

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-05 Thread Peter
--- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Curtis wrote: > > Richard didn't need it,he just knows! > > > Don't be a fool, Curtis, - there's not a single > thing > you can learn at a TTC, CCP, or ATC, that you can't > learn right where you are sitting. Some of you TM > teachers get al

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Peter
--- curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> When someone claims to know more about TM than > MMY, > > the conversation screeches to an immediate halt > and > > one politely excuses oneself because they left > > something cooking on the stove, so sorry! We must > chat > > later, yes, inde

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Peter
--- curtisdeltablues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. > Williams" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Curtis wrote: > > > So Richard claims to know more about TM > > > than MMY, but I claim to know more about > > > his teaching than people who have

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Vaj
On Feb 4, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Vaj wrote: Most westerners would do well, for the sake of perspective, to look at what political movements these Vedic Fundies are associated with. I think they'd be downright shocked. Unless of course Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Anally or some other

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Vaj
On Feb 4, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Duveyoung wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "claudiouk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Never was myself a TM teacher and personally I WAS interested in > MMY's commentary on the Gita and his SBAL - as an underlying > universal spiritual perspective to

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duveyoung Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 2:25 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM) Is anyone else besides the WAR MONGER thinking

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Vaj
On Feb 4, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote: Curtis wrote: > My point was only concerning certain specific content. > My point was that I can't find any reference in SBAL where the Maharishi talks about the "demons" of Hindu mythology. Did he mention this at your TTC? According to Ed,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: TM has never been secular (secular organization to teach TM)

2008-02-04 Thread Peter
Richard, are you a TM teacher? A Governor? --- "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, where, exactly, in SBAL does Maharishi talk > about > > > "demons"? > > > > Curtis wrote: > > What kind of line are you trying to draw here > Richard? > > > That almost all of the Maharishi