[https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/q71/1461107_66391608697299\
4_1797573319_n.jpg]
https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/q71/1461107_663916086972994\
_1797573319_n.jpg
https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/q71/1461107_66391608697299\
4_1797573319_n.jpg
[https://scontent-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc3/q71/1465342_68714836130734\
5_119584660_n.jpg]
It should be quite fairly said in summation that one of the historically more
pivotal and important books published in the 20th Century was, Scientific
Research on the Transcendental Meditation Program Collected Papers Volume I
(1976). The “Collected Papers” though not as well known as the
Nice, turq, and I'd add: we often listen with the intention to reply and by
replying, *improve* our fellow humans any way we can, whether they want to be
*improved* or not! Of course this doesn't apply much to the Funny Farm Lounge
(-:
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 3:22 AM, TurquoiseB
noozguru, a lot of folks stayed here so their kids could attend Maharishi
school. Now that kids are grown, you're right, they've stayed because of the
low cost of living. I think also because of having a meditating community,
whether or not they are in the Dome. And there's always the wonderful
“There is a broad scientific consensus that to keep global warming in check, we
need to phase out 80 percent of all oil, coal and natural gas by mid-century.
President Obama has set a nonbinding target to do precisely that.”
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/29/chinese-give-birth-america-secure-benefits/
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/nov/29/chinese-give-birth-america-secure-benefits/
Yet *trickle down* capitalism has been the story of America since it's
inception. American capitalism has created more wealth than any other economic
system and with that wealth has lifted more people out of poverty than any
other system and come to the aid of those in dire straights to lift
I think historically is the wrong word to use. History has completely
forgotten early TM research, mostly because it wasn't very good. A similar
question mark is frequently raised about new TM research. But it does do
something, and it does get published. Whether that something is the best
Just for fun, Hebrew personal pronouns:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Hebrew/Personal_Pronouns
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Hebrew/Personal_Pronouns
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:
This new practice is catching on in a SF Bay Area college for women--and a few
Hebrew excercise:
mi: hu: (me who?) = Who (mi:) [is] he (hu:)? LoL! ?
It may take some time go grasp that, eh??
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote:
Just address them by their true pronoun descriptor ... it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@...
If you read the document that Pope Francis wrote, there is none of the
exclusionary language that you refer to, in it. He specifically warns against
that, and many other ways to become falsely pious. He refers to capitalism, the
monetization of anything and everything, as dehumanizing. I agree
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... wrote:
If you read the document that Pope Francis wrote, there is none of the
exclusionary language that you refer to, in it. He specifically warns
against that, and many other ways to become falsely pious. He refers to
capitalism, the
OK, Share, let's see if you can both listen and reply to this post, which is
about some unfinished business from yesterday that we need to deal with.
In a post to Barry, you wrote:
Judy first ran her number on me on Sept 9, 2012.
As I've already noted, this is not true. We had
Ah. Demonstrating once again that she can't let *anything* lie, and
feels compelled to start it back up again and try to turn it into one of
her endless tarbaby arguments, Judy challenges Share to a pissing
contest. Might I remind Share before she falls for it how pissing
contests tend to end?
Probably not, at least right now, but it's becoming increasingly accepted in
less-formal contexts, as I say.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:
Judy,
I don't believe they as a single pronoun would pass muster in a formal
report to Congress.
---In
John and Judy, I have been shocked by the grammar and spelling mistakes I have
seen in so called formal documents, such as business memos. So nothing would
surprise me in that regard. Like how many people get it's and its wrong; don't
use possessive before a gerund; get there, their and they're
It's a grammar jungle out there imho (-:
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 9:35 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:
John and Judy, I have been shocked by the grammar and spelling mistakes I have
seen in so called formal documents, such as business memos. So nothing would
surprise me
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
It's a grammar jungle out there imho (-:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/aj8/19-jokes-only-grammar-nerds-will-understand-\
cfe3
http://www.buzzfeed.com/aj8/19-jokes-only-grammar-nerds-will-understand\
-cfe3
According to MMY, the TM is based on selecting a suitable support for
meditation, called in India a mantra, specifically a bija mantra. The
term bija in Sanskrit means seed and mantra is from the Sanskrit root
man, to think, and tra a tool - so a mantra is a tool for thinking.
The word
Barry, of course, is actually encouraging a pissing contest by advising Share
to refrain from acknowledging reality. (Although goodness knows, she doesn't
need any help doing that.)
And good grief, I've let lie far more than I've ever taken up on this forum,
as Barry well knows.
I'm not
I'm a grammar nerd and nazi and I never knew til today. See, this is why I love
FFL (-:
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 9:47 AM, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
It's a grammar jungle out there imho (-:
Judy, we remember it differently. That's all there is to it imo.
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 9:47 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Barry, of course, is actually encouraging a pissing contest by advising Share
to refrain from acknowledging reality. (Although
You may remember it differently, Share, but as you know I just now corrected
your false memory by actually quoting the posts you were misremembering. And
just think, everyone can read what you said and what I said, so nobody is going
to fall for your remember it differently excuse. Instead,
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
Ah. Demonstrating once again that she can't let *anything* lie, and feels
compelled to start it back up again and try to turn it into one of her endless
tarbaby arguments, Judy challenges Share to a pissing contest. Might I remind
Emily - According to MMY, meditation is based on thinking - Anyone who
can think can meditate.
Meditation simply means to think things over. Based on that
definition, everyone on the entire planet meditates. Everyone pauses
once or twice a day to take stock of their own mental contents. And,
Authfriend's modus operandi: A falsis principiis proficisci. (Marcus Tullius
Cicero)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:
Judy, we remember it differently. That's all there is to it imo.
I read this and, just as an experiment, I thought about what I would write if
I were you (but really me) in this situation. Here is what, to the best of my
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Emily - According to MMY, meditation is based on thinking - Anyone who can
think can meditate.
Meditation simply means to think things over. Based on that definition,
everyone on the entire planet meditates. Everyone pauses
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:
Authfriend's modus operandi: A falsis principiis proficisci. (Marcus Tullius
Cicero)
And you're the guy in Unity?
Maybe you forgot to mention the bovine flatulence in Iowa and farming in
general which produces more CO2 that auto emissions. And, don't forget
sheep, chickens, pigs and goats. Face it, Buck, you're screwed on the farm.
Livestock are responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gases that
If we didn't eat 'em they wouldn't raise 'em.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Maybe you forgot to mention the bovine flatulence in Iowa and farming in
general which produces more CO2 that auto emissions. And, don't forget sheep,
chickens, pigs and goats. Face it,
It would also be interesting to see what percentage of home buyers in
the US are from China. The house I sold back in September was bought by
a couple from China. After all they've got the money. American's
don't. So it goes.
On 12/01/2013 04:47 AM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote:
That's a great idea, Ann! Why don't we all write as if we are someone else --
then we can show how much wiser and better we are in every respect than the
individual we are impersonating!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In
Thank you, Ann. I would accept an I misremembered admission from Share if she
made it crystal clear she was acknowledging that her memory had been wrong, and
then apologized for those mistakes having put me in a bad light.
But We remember it differently doesn't fly. No matter how hard she
When listening to a political discussion programme on radio or TV have you
ever heard a contributor say to an opponent: That's a good point. I shall now
revise my opinion. Thank you for helping me see more clearly into the nature of
the problem?
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com,
Richard, as far as I'm concerned, if one can breathe, one can meditate. The
mind is an endless playground. What it thinks it knows is simply feeding its
high opinion of itself. I want to live my life based on core principles and a
connection to life that stems from the heart and soul and
Judy, what do you mean by: taken severely to task and strong community
disapproval? Those parts weren't clear yet imo they are what drives you.
As best as I can I've read all the posts on this topic. I agree with another
poster in that I think people are basically honest. I think they
P.S. And thank you Richard for offering, but I don't need to be taught how
to meditate. I know how. Smile. I like what you said about how meditation is
very similar in many different traditions.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:
Richard, as far as I'm concerned,
Does China have a similar entitlement? If so, maybe American and European women
should give birth in China. The Chinese are cash rich and the US and a good
slice of Europe (including the UK and Mediterranean countries) are technically
broke.
When I say technically I don't mean something a
You know, Feste, Share just loved it when you said a few days back that you
hadn't been happy with her attack on Ann. She told you so herself; remember?
Today you have a chance to give Share an even bigger thrill by making it clear
you don't approve of the way she's trying to wiggle out of
Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly what you
think they ought to say. You seem to demand it as a kind of self-validation:
you are right and everyone must acknowledge how right you are and how wrong
your dishonest opponents are. They are disreputable human
Re: Now even Emily is so eager to be negative towards me that she criticized
my using the term half sister to refer to the woman with whom I have the same
father but a different mother! If that isn't gratuitous criticism, I don't know
what is!
No Share, not at all. You assume that you know
Share wanted to know:
Judy, what do you mean by: taken severely to task and strong community
disapproval? Those parts
weren't clear
Share, you're a college graduate, right? Which words did you not understand?
(Anybody else out there who read this, did you find it unclear?)
Infowars also posted a video with scenes from Dawn of the Dead and
Black Friday. Thing is the zombies in Dawn of the Dead are sluggish
Romero zombies and Black Friday Shoppers are highly animated. Infowars
also posted a video of Black Friday Shopping in the UK which was calm
and orderly
Share,
That is a good reason why a person who can write well will be successful in
any big organization like the government and universities.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:
John and Judy, I have been shocked by the grammar and spelling mistakes I have
seen
As demonstrated on this forum, at least, Share's makeup prevents her from
taking personal accountability for her words or actions. This isn't a
criticism, it is simply a fact based on hundreds of examples she has provided
in black and white. To ask her to do that is a waste of time. It has
JR, how do you define success in the context of your comment?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:
Share,
That is a good reason why a person who can write well will be successful in
any big organization like the government and universities.
---In
Feste sputtered:
Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly what
you think they ought to say.
You seem to demand it as a kind of self-validation: you are right and
everyone must acknowledge how
right you are and how wrong your dishonest opponents are.
Bhairitu wrote:
Infowars also posted a video with scenes from Dawn of the Dead and Black
Friday. Thing is the zombies
in Dawn of the Dead are sluggish Romero zombies and Black Friday Shoppers
are highly animated.
LOL.
Infowars also posted a video of Black Friday
Isn't that incredible? Looks like Share's defenders had the shit scared out of
them by my post documenting her untruthfulness. There's no possible rebuttal,
and they can't admit even that she misremembered, so they're frantically
standing on their heads and wiggling their ears trying to save
This example is what I mean by accountability and it is done objectively.
Not that hard and it works to keep lines of communication between two people
open, imho.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@...
Emily,
It means one gets promoted to a better position that requires good writing,
job security, and better pay. If one can't achieve this in one organization,
there will be others who will gladly take him or her. Above all, you should be
enjoying the work itself to be successful at it.
Barry,
Whatever happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas.
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
It's a grammar jungle out there imho (-:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/aj8/19-jokes-only-grammar-nerds-will-understand-cfe3
Thanks John. I haven't found that success in terms of promotion or better
pay depends much on good writing as a criteria in general, but depends on the
position. Success is a subjective term and certainly to enjoy one's work is
to have succeeded.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Re I don't believe they as a single pronoun would pass muster in a formal
report to Congress.:
Yes, I was wondering if legal documents have strict rules on this to avoid
dangerous ambiguity.
Don't many US colleges encourage students to use she as the singular
(instead of he) or is that
Just speaking for myself, I sure am glad we have Judy around to remind
us of our ethical duties on this discussion group. What would we do
without her? Go figure.
The rudeness, the arrogance, the insulting manner of my approach was to
deliver perhaps enough of a shock to make her utter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Just speaking for myself, I sure am glad we have Judy around to remind
us of our ethical duties on this discussion group. What would we do
without her?
Uh, maybe talk about the things this forum was created to talk about?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 wrote:
Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly
what you think they ought to say. You seem to demand it as a kind of
self-validation: you are right and everyone must acknowledge how right
you are and how wrong your
I always thought it would make sense for writers to use the pronoun appropriate
to their sex. A man would always use he and a woman she. If that became the
consistent standard convention, it would make things so much simpler. (Only
problem would be if an author's name wasn't gender-specific,
Correction: To ask her to do that is a waste of my time currently. Maybe
later.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:
As demonstrated on this forum, at least, Share's makeup prevents her from
taking personal accountability for her words or actions. This isn't a
Barry, that is by far the craziest thing you've said in a long time. It really
is crazy; do you believe what you write?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
feste37 wrote:
Oh, auth, you
giggle
Poor Barry.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
feste37 wrote:
Oh, auth, you want to control everyone's responses so they say exactly
what you think they ought to say. You seem
You stooge. Nobody is getting Share. Share has the opportunity to stand up
to the plate and be honest and acknowledge the reality of her words. I doubt
either Ann or Judy has, and I certainly don't, have any expectations that this
will occur. It's very simple, really. But, fear is one of
Actually it's just been a single discussion concerning Share's mean,
gratuitous, and deeply untruthful post to you, Barry, about a post of mine to
her from last year.
It's so interesting how a Get Judy, Ann, and Emily Fest is entirely acceptable
to you and your band of Mean Girls (Xeno and
Fuckin scam artist
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 10:49 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
If we didn't eat 'em they wouldn't raise 'em.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:
Maybe you forgot to mention the bovine flatulence in Iowa and farming in
general which produces
Seems like anything that packaged and processed would have low prana.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:23 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
You can certainly take this all with a large grain of salt. I am sure
there are many other sites that recommend it and many that do not.
Please note that Yahoo Groups does not support 7.0 or earlier versions
of Internet Explorer. I recommend upgrading to the latest Internet
Explorer, Google Chrome, or Firefox. If you are using IE 9 or later,
make sure you turn off Compatibility View.
S3,
When a writer wants to address both or all genders, it is recommended to use a
generic term such as the spectator or meditator. If the writer wants to be
more specific, then the gender specific pronouns. like he and she, can be used.
But the accepted authority in the USA for the
End the War on Drugs! http://www.leap.cc/ Check it out finker :) @Richard
J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Richard J. Williams
pundits...@gmail.comwrote:
It's one thing to fink on your friends; it another thing to fink on total
strangers. Go figure.
On
What's unfortunate is that Emily used to wrote some interesting posts but once
she got on Judy's bandwagon she's become imo sort of repetitive.
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:22 AM, anartax...@yahoo.com
anartax...@yahoo.com wrote:
Authfriend's modus operandi: A falsis principiis
That is revisionist history, Mike. The original founding fathers had a
bad taste in their mouth from capitalism in the form of the British East
India Company. The founding fathers believed in a commons. You
maintain the commons with government. That's what government is for.
It's for the
One of Judy's main tactics is to define the context and or parameters of an
argument. IOW, it's about what she says it's about. Of course, that only works
if one is talking only to one's self (-:
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 1:29 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Conversation between Share and Emily:
Share: It's raining in Iowa.
Emily: Share, is it raining in Fairfield?
Share: Emily, I heard it on the news today that it's raining.
Emily: Share, is it raining outside your door?
Share: Emily, the Farmer's Almanac says that it will be raining this
Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too!
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:33 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com
emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Conversation between Share and Emily:
Share: It's raining in Iowa.
Emily: Share, is it raining in Fairfield?
Share: Emily, I heard it on the news today that
You misunderstand. I meant that Ann is not involved in the situation, not you.
By kind of nuts, I mean your relentless obsession with small, unimportant
details, your inability to let go of anything in the way that a normal person
would. Quite frankly, you often sound like a patient in a
O.K. Share, let's try one more time. Re: What's unfortunate is that Emily
used to wrote some interesting posts...
Share: What posts of mine did you used to find interesting?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:
Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too!
On
For example, Emily, you used to have some interesting exchanges with Curtis, I
think about music.
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:45 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com
emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
O.K. Share, let's try one more time. Re: What's unfortunate is that Emily
used to wrote some
Good lord, somebody get her some Valium before she goes completely off the
rails.
I don't have a bandwagon, and if I did, Emily would be about the last to get
on it. She runs her own show, always has.
See, Share is using Barry's incredibly cowardly tactic. She's so hard up it
isn't
So Emily, tell us why you are on FFL and have no background in TM? I
would think you'd feel like a fish out of water.
On 12/01/2013 12:45 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
O.K. Share, let's try one more time. Re: What's unfortunate is that
Emily used to wrote some interesting posts...
Share, you're already in way deep shit. Don't make it any deeper, and don't
make of yourself an even bigger target with idiotic, senseless observations
like this.
Share puked:
One of Judy's main tactics is to define the context and or parameters of an
argument. IOW,
it's about what
Share, you're already in very deep shit; your poor, frantic defenders are
trying to save you from drowning in your own excreta. Don't make it tougher on
them with idiotic remarks like this.
Share retched:
One of Judy's main tactics is to define the context and or parameters of an
Er, Share, she's parodying you (and Barry). And very aptly, too. Can you laugh
at yourself? No, of course not. Neither can Barry.
Share upchucks:
Jeez! Now Emily has gone bonkers too!
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 2:33 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... wrote:
Conversation between
According to the Weather Channel it's supposed to rain in the Bay Area
on Tuesday. AND temps are supposed to be in the high 20s overnight (at
least around here). That could lead to snow and funny thing is the
other night I had a dream about driving in SF in the snow (like Seattle
gets).
I am glad you enjoyed those Share. Curtis has been gone a long time now
though, although I am curious about what he thinks of Robbie Robertson. Here
is a second question for you: How to you remember the posts that Judy wrote
differently than she wrote them? No, this is not a setup. I am
You know, I've been asking myself this and I have an answer. I'll get back to
you later as I have no more time today to write it out.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote:
So Emily, tell us why you are on FFL and have no background in TM? I would
think you'd feel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I am glad you enjoyed those Share. Curtis has been gone a long time
now though, although I am curious about what he thinks of Robbie
Robertson. Here is a second question for you: How to you remember the
posts that Judy wrote differently than she
Today we went by this place:
[image: Inline image 2]
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote:
Today we went to this place:
[image: Inline image 1]
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote:
Today I went to this
The problem boils down to one of moral turpitude, or the lack of it.
1. Taking part in a conspiracy (or attempting to take part in a
conspiracy) to commit a crime involving moral turpitude where the
attempted crime would not itself constitute moral turpitude. Go figure.
Fraud:
Making false
Well, at least you could pick someone that's dead before you pick their
name to post with. Go figure.
On 12/1/2013 1:50 PM, Toby Walker wrote:
End the War on Drugs! http://www.leap.cc/ Check it out finker :)
@Richard J. williamspundits...@gmail.com mailto:pundits...@gmail.com
On Fri, Nov
Evidence has been found that William Tell and his family were avid
bowlers. Unfortunately, all the Swiss league records were destroyed in a
fire. And, so we'll never know for whom the Tells bowled.
Emily, if you'll forgive me, I can't figure out what this question means; I
wouldn't blame Share if she couldn't either:
Emily wrote:
Here is a second question for you: How to you remember the posts that Judy
wrote differently than she
wrote them? No, this is not a setup. I am
Well, at least you could pick someone that's dead before you pick their
name to post with. Go figure. What ? Richard?
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote:
Well, at least you could pick someone that's dead before you pick their
name to post with. Go
If I eat one more bite of chicken, I think I'm gonna sprout feathers! Mom and I
went to PF Chang today and she got lettuce wrapped chicken. Yum, but I'm
yearning for my quinoa (-:
On Sunday, December 1, 2013 3:13 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
According to the Weather
Yep Bhari2, that has become my question also.
So Emily, since you never learned TM, why are you here on this forum?
Is this your little gossip parlor?
Maybe instead this is this your prayer hut. So which deity do you pray to
anyway? Yhvh? Jesus? Christos Pantocrator? Is it a He, a She
Empty, been noticing Alex Jones using phrases like absolute
enlightenment these days?
On 12/01/2013 02:58 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yep Bhari2, that has become my question also.
So Emily, since you never learned TM, why are you here on this forum?
Is this your little gossip parlor?
http://www.infowars.com/senate-and-house-intelligence-committees-defend-destruction-of-constitution/
http://www.infowars.com/senate-and-house-intelligence-committees-defend-destruction-of-constitution/
You know, you guys, it's not as if Emily has never given us an account of why
she's here. She has done so, in some detail, in her early posts and in
subsequent updates. That you don't remember or never read them is not something
for which you can blame her.
Having learned TM is not a
After searching Absolute Enlightenment on the Inforwars site, not much came
up other than the usual paranoia. Seems more of a diatribe type phrase used
against the enlightened elites who rule over us - their cattle.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote:
Empty, been
I addressed Emily rather than you.
Perhaps you believe you now speak for her and can now answer questions posed to
her. However, I am interested in Emily's response. I have faith that she is
capable of responding directly with some intelligence - unencombered by your
personal likes and
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
