[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, some newbie asked: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Go for a calm, relaxing, four-minute cross-country ski break
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Methinks it could be short lived if we get around to playing it again. I did better than I expected this first day of skiing. But quite exhausted. Gonna see if I can get through these remaining posts before nodding off. I have the same problem, and I wasn't even skiing. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on everything said about posting limits back during the period when they were being debated as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop making 100-150 posts per week and STFU: If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently-- and *nastily*--complaining about the top posters here if they were critical of TM and supportive of Barry, rather than supportive of TM and critical of Barry, I have a nice bridge you might want to have a look at. - Judy Stein, Nov 3, 2006 In other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with her, when she was making that many to stalk other people, as she's done consistently for almost 20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns the table on her and the other Mean Girls, suddenly *she's* the one trying to sell the posting limits bridge to other people. Can you say Karma, dude? I think you can. :-) Here she is proposing the *exact same strategy* currently being used against her so effectively by Richard (bold emphasis mine): I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but it's awfully convenient for Barry that the three top posters just happen to be among his chief critics here-- so he can try to intimidate us into silence under cover of complaining about how much we post. It would be fun to see what he'd do if we were to limit our posts to criticisms of him. - Judy Stein, Nov 2, 2006 Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he has *plenty* to say, about many topics, pretty much all of them more interesting than Judy Stein. All he had to do was up his quotient of posts criticizing Judy and she goes batshit crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the people screaming for posting limits again. The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty clear-cut: NO ONE but Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered by Richard turning the tables and doing to her what she's done to so many others for so many years. NO ONE is rushing to her defense. Instead, pretty much everyone is kinda *enjoying* seeing her get a taste of her own medicine. Richard has, in fact, given the rest of us who've had to live with this woman's insanity for so long a kind of Christmas present, letting us see her demonstrate how badly she handles someone doing to her what she does to others. I therefore nominate Richard as FFL Santa of the Year. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Go for a calm, relaxing, four-minute cross-country ski break
thanks, turq, my first LOL of the day. And yes, I'm sure my posts rank high in your nodding off category. Go figure! On Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:30 AM, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Methinks it could be short lived if we get around to playing it again. I did better than I expected this first day of skiing. But quite exhausted. Gonna see if I can get through these remaining posts before nodding off. I have the same problem, and I wasn't even skiing. :-)
[FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
I am just a humble meditator. I could help moderate this. I have shoveled a lot of shit in my lifetime. I am going to go out right now by dawn's early light before going to the morning Dome meditation to shovel some shit. I feel that by by life's fullest and long experience that I could be pretty good at moderating this list. My friends all call me Judicious by nickname. I could be quite fair enforcing a posting limit here for the good of the group. Let me have the password to FFL and I'll do it. I feel like I could serve the group well in moderation. I volunteer. Jai Brahmananda Saraswati, -Buck of the Dome
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. I completely understand, and please remember that *I* am not the person asking for posting limits again. Hilariously, it's the person who *they were invented for* asking for them. That said, I *can* think of a more low maintenance version of the Posting Limit, should anyone want to take over your function. This version only requires the moderator to look at one Post Count post per week, the one that comes out after Friday night and that contains the weekly totals. If anyone on it has gone over 75 posts, the moderator just blocks their address and bans them from posting, FOREVER. I already know who the first three people to go would be, and Richard wouldn't be one of them. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@{{evilDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
Brings up an interesting question: why don't Judy and Ann filter out Richard? And me and turq and feste and whoever else is on their unacceptable list. And if they don't want to delete those posts, it's simple enough to create a Maybe Read Later folder. I now have over 50 posts in my Maybe Read Later folder! On Thursday, December 26, 2013 5:49 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] History of Christmas
Very cool, John. I've also thought that the Divine Feminine can be thought of as the universal horizontal and the Divine Masculine as the universal vertical. In this sense Jesus can be seen to embody both. On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 11:10 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com wrote: Share, The acharya's observation is similar to Santos Bonacci's point about Leonardo Da Vinci's. The Last Supper painting. In his video, Bonacci said that the painting represents the variious zodiac signs and the four seasons. The position of Jesus in the middle of the table represents the cross or the intersection between the equinoxial and solticial lines. Thus his presence means that his teachings will last for all time here on earth or figuratively for the entire universe.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: Brings up an interesting question: why don't Judy and Ann filter out Richard? And me and turq and feste and whoever else is on their unacceptable list. Especially if, *as they claim*, neither they nor anyone else here takes what any of us says seriously. Seems to me they take it VERY seriously indeed. *They*, ironically, are the only ones now lobbying for posting limits to cut down the number of things said about them. Talk about Egos In A Panic. :-) The irony of it all is just too delicious. The very person the FFL Posting Limits were invented FOR is now crying like a baby and calling for them again, to keep someone from doing to her what *she* was doing to many others back when they first invented the Posting Limits to get *her* to lighten up. Thanks again for the Christmas present, Richard. :-)
[FairfieldLife] RE: FairfieldLife-supporting
Om, This lecture is even better the 2nd time listening through once you got where the geography of the lecture goes. -Buck Veda and Greece http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 Buck wrote: Deep and spiritual marination everywhere. In Fairfield, Iowa this kind of extremely elevated thing like this lecture is the kind thing that gets talked about in all the shops, places and cafes and the kind of thing that we have playing on our radios. Deep and spiritual marination everywhere. It is in the air-waves. It is even on the car radio when you drive around Fairfield, Iowa commuting or just out on errands. It is in the Walkman or on the ipod when folks are out walking or biking or doing work, ditch digging or out with doing farm chores. I'd seriously recommend it for everyone: http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 For good listening outside like even when Buck is not in the Dome, -Buck http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 Buck wrote: Most you people lurking here and a lot posting here on FFL I git the impression don't live anywhere close to Fairfield, Iowa and it seems a number of you don't even meditate. There is a fabulous lecture on the Greeks and the Veda you can listen to vicariously to give you some feeling as to what we are doing here as a meditating community. It is a good lecture that connects and does unifies in context a lot of what is going on here really. Anybody on Fairfieldlife really ought to listen to this lecture to really be able to participate with much of anything to say on Fairfieldlife. It would improve the group a lot if we were all on one page at least about certain things and not just dumping any ignorant stuff here on this forum. I should recommend you all listen to this distinguished lecture for the good of the community here. Listen to it clear through. It is an mp3 and would be good for you and the group here: http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 -Buck in the Dome Take the time. [Sorry for the formatting, Yahoo-Neo is the shits.]
[FairfieldLife] Meditation: It's Not What You Think
You can define meditation as a type of prayer. According to MMY, meditation is like prayer, except on a very subtle level. In a recent visit to Sonoma in California it seemed like almost the entire northern half of California meditates using various breath awareness techniques or various yoga techniques. I know that in northern California lots of people practice Zen meditation. Recently I sat with Jokusho Kwong, the roshi of the Sonoma Zen Center, when I visited my daughter in Santa Rosa. I've known the roshi since the days when I sat with Suzuki at the San Francisco Zen Center. [image: Inline image 1] Everyday Zen at Sonoma Zen Center According to the dictionary, meditation means simply 'to think things over'. If so, then everyone meditates. There's probably not a person on the planet who doesn't pause once or twice a day to take stock of their mind contents. And we're all transcending - even without a specific technique. So, the question is: do you enjoy? As a method of stress reduction, meditation is often used in hospitals in cases of chronic or terminal illness to reduce complications associated with increased stress including a depressed immune system. There is growing agreement in the medical community that mental factors such as stress significantly contribute to a lack of physical health, and there is a growing movement in mainstream science to fund research in this area. Dr. Herbert Benson of the Mind-Body Medical Institute, which is affiliated with Harvard and several Boston hospitals, reports that meditation induces a host of biochemical and physical changes in the body collectively referred to as the 'relaxation response.' The relaxation response includes changes in metabolism, heart rate, respiration, blood pressure and brain chemistry. Benson and his team have also done clinical studies at Buddhist monasteries in the Himalayan Mountains. Transcendental means to go beyond; meditation means thinking. Hence, 'Transcendental Meditation' means to go beyond thinking. - Charlie Lutes Works cited: Charles F. Lutes http://www.maharishiphotos.com/tmintro.html Sonoma Mountain Zen Center: http://www.smzc.net/ Meditation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditation Other References: 'The Mystery of Consciousness' By Steven Pinker Time Magazine, Friday, Jan. 19, 2007 http://tinyurl.com/3ck5qe 'The Science of Meditation' Time Magazine Cover Story, August 4, 2003 http://tinyurl.com/63xac5 'Just say Om' by Joel Stein Time Magazine, Sunday, Jul. 27, 2003 http://tinyurl.com/icu6
[FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion
This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of embarrassment at her behavior. I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign the integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think. Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never ending dispute. When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but with a change of attitude. So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams masked zebra wrote: In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very recently been unable to accepteven tolerate. And this was of course because of his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide with the truth, with reality. Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence. So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and Raunchydog), his judgment of me and my posts is valid as well. Now I would just ask the readers of FFLthose who have aligned themselves with Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, with Jim and othersto reconsider their position, since for someone like myself to undergo a change of perception this significant, a change which I was determined would not and could not happen, suggests something very powerful at work here. You remember Saul persecuting the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to Damascus by Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a fierce defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as spectacular a transformation of belief, I think there are parallels here, and to the extent to which Saul became Paul, I have become a very different Robin. I don't say that Barry is Jesus or anything like that. That would be absurd. And even if I did think that Barry was Christ, I know he would only have contempt for such a view of him. So, no, I won't go that far. But I will say that in the main Barry has been right all along, and even his most vitriolic and bitter posts have been in the service of somehow forcing people to see what they, like me, were blind to. Well, I have been persuaded, and in a way which really means something, that Barry is the martyr here, and I can't tell you (although Steve perhaps has somewhat had the foretaste of such a sensationbut only very mildly) how much better I feel, not just in my heart, but in my conscience. I am not going to congratulate myself on what I have accomplished here in mortifying my pride and my sense of righteousness to bend the knee and reverse course in my judgment of this person, but I do think that
[FairfieldLife] The Art of Multi-Dimensional Living
A message from Edward Tarabilda: Despite these drawbacks in his recent teaching and his failure to fully honor The Art of Multi-Dimensional Living®, by promoting only one generic form of meditation, Maharishi still deserves our praise and thanks. No one has done more to enhance human evolution in the twentieth century than Maharishi. He has been a virtual dynamo from the moment he came out of the Himalayas, and has offered a seemingly never ending series of innovative programs to help mankind solve its pressing problems. I, myself, have gained much from Maharishi and hold him in high esteem, even though I am also, at times, his harshest critic. One of my criticisms has been Maharishi's tendency to promote a dangerous form of elitism among his followers. There is a difference between one-pointed attention to the task at hand and an elitism which tends to dismiss the contributions of others as insignificant. The streak of eastern fundamentalism which is so predominant in Swami Brahmananda Saraswati's other disciple, Swami Prakashananda, also exists in Maharishi's teaching and organization, although to a lesser degree. These authoritarian tendencies exist in most eastern teachings and are one of the reasons why they are no longer the most suitable for modern western people. However, none of what I have just said should keep us from admiring the accomplishments of these group, nor from supporting them where appropriate. In Maharishi's defense, we must realize that the urgency of his task (helping prevent the world from self-destructing) required unusual methods and sacrifices, which sometimes appear to ignore or violate the principles of The Art of Multi-Dimensional Living® He has always suggested that a time would come when the spiritual needs of each individual would become a rightly restored priority. It is apparent that in saying this, he was referring to the advent of The Art of Multi-Dimensional Living. The only way you will know if a teacher is enlightened, is if he is able to enlighten you! - Edward Tarabilda A Note on Edward Tarabilda: The late Edward F. Tarabilda's was a spiritual teacher in the tradition of knowledge known as Gyana Yoga. The Art of Multi-Dimensional Living is a profound elaboration of this path which grew out of his inner cognitions. Edward was a colleague of Dr Vasant Lad and Dr David Frawley. Edward Tarabilda, of Fairfield, IA, was an early adopter of TM, author and critic, philosopher, spiritual guide, ex- M.U.M faculty, ex-M.U.M. Vice-President, passed away on January 10th, 1999 at Fairfield, IA while playing tennis at MUM. Read more: 'Ayurveda Revolutionized: Integrating' by Edward Tarabilda Lotus Press, 1997 'The Art of Multi-dimensional Living' by Edward Tarabilda http://shell.forethought.net/~risaacs/ http://shell.forethought.net/%7Erisaacs/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Classical Masterpieces
Richard Wagner [image: Inline image 1] Rienzi Overture (Full) - The Symphony Orchestra of the LISZT School of Music, Weimar http://youtu.be/URIwWtwn6qA Wilhelm Richard Wagner was a German composer, theater director, polemicist, and conductor who is primarily known for his operas. Wagner revolutionized opera through his concept of the Gesamtkunstwerk (total work of art), by which he sought to synthesis the poetic, visual, musical and dramatic arts, with music subsidiary to drama, and which was announced in a series of essays between 1849 and 1852. Wagner realized these ideas most fully in the first half of the four-opera cycle Der Ring des Nibelungen (The Ring of the Nibelung). Read more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Wagner A note on Wagner: Apparently Wagner wore pink underwear, climbed trees, and liked to stand on his head. To match his pink pink underwear he often wore satin breeches, a pink eiderdown-padded house robe and pink slippers with the rose bouquets. In spite of this, some people think he wrote some nice music. Go figure. As a young college student I listened to several of his operas (works) in two courses of music appreciation. I attended this course twice so that I could get the perspective from two different professors of music. We would sit here for hours listening to the arias,which were translated,probably because nobody in the class could understand all those complicated German words. You can always tell a genuine Wagner opera because they last for hours on end when performed on the stage. One critic at the time wrote about a Wagner opera: Of all the clumsy,lumbering, boggling, baboon-blooded stuff I ever saw on a human stage; of all the affected, sapless, soul-less, beginingless, endless, topless, bottomless, topsy-turviest doggerel of sound I ever endured the deadliness of,that eternity of nothing was the deadliest. Work cited: 'Lives of the Musical Greats' by Victor Borge Doubleday-Tarcher, 1971 p. 119 On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote: Igor Stravinsky [image: Inline image 2] The Firebird - Gergiev · Vienna Philarmonic http://youtu.be/RZkIAVGlfWk Petrushka - Boston Symphony Orchestra http://youtu.be/ZZIEKCN-rIU The Rite of Spring (Le Sacre du printemps) - Leonard Bernstein http://youtu.be/5Kyso5VmZ6g Igor Stravinsky is considered to be one of the most important and influential composers of the 20th century. Stravinsky's compositional career was notable for its stylistic diversity. He first achieved international fame with three ballets commissioned by the impresario Sergei Diaghilev and first performed in Paris by Diaghilev's Ballets Russes: The Firebird (1910), Petrushka (1911) and The Rite of Spring (1913). Stravinsky was named by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people of the century. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igor_Stravinsky On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote: [image: Inline image 1] Aram Khachaturian - Sabre Dance, Seiji Ozawa http://youtu.be/ejIk_Za-q4Y Sabre Dance is a movement in the final act of the ballet Gayane (1942) by Aram Khachaturian. It is considered Khachaturian's most famous work. It is based on Armenian folk music, especially its middle section. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabre_Dance [image: Inline image 2] Aram Khachaturian was a Soviet Armenian composer. Alongside Sergei Prokofiev and Dmitri Shostakovich, Khachaturian is sometimes called one of the three 'titans' of Soviet music. He is also considered 'one of the major musicians' of the 20th century. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aram_Khachaturian On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote: [image: Inline image 3] Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - Piano Concerto No. 21 in C Andante (2nd Movement) - Daniel Barenboim http://youtu.be/DRCEwy5XQSs The second movement was featured in the 1967 Swedish film Elvira Madigan. Elvira Madigan is a 1967 Swedish film directed by Bo Widerberg, based on the tragedy of the Danish tightrope dancer Hedvig Jensen (born 1867), working under the stage name of Elvira Madigan at her stepfather's travelling circus, who runs away with the deserter Swedish lieutenant Sixten Sparre (born 1854) [image: Inline image 4] Elvira Madigan: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvira_Madiganhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvira_Madigan_%28film%29 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was a prolific and influential composer of the Classical era. Mozart showed prodigious ability from his earliest childhood. Already competent on keyboard and violin, he composed from the age of five and performed before European royalty. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote: [image: Inline image 1] Beethoven Symphony No. 9, 'Choral' - Daniel Barenboim, Royal Albert Hall, 27 July 2012
[FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
Hooray!!! I am always in favor of self-sufficiency, especially when it comes to something as extraneous and just for fun, as a web forum. Even if I post 10,000 posts next week, no will miss a meal or lose a loved one. This issue in terms of stuff that matters, falls way down near the bottom of my list. As for Richard's postings, they all look the same to me - nothing differentiates one from another, so, no offense, please, but I don't think I have read one in months. Regarding the continual efforts of Judy to prove Barry wrong, and his ongoing efforts to prove her wrong, that has become a hallmark around here - The Squabbling Seniors, I call it. Kinda fun, when I am in the mood to watch. Btw, I wrapped all the Christmas presents I gave this year in *meat-themed* wrapping paper - one looked like ground beef, or symmetrical corn dogs, or cuts of meat. Purchased from the Archie McPhee website. Note to Ann - also bought something called Emergency Horse, which is a small plastic device with a speaker on it, and four buttons that each reproduce the sound of a horse; neigh, snort, gallop and whinny. Well worth the $4.95. http://mcphee.com/shop/meat-parade-wrapping-paper-book.html http://mcphee.com/shop/meat-parade-wrapping-paper-book.html
[FairfieldLife] Adventures in Mind Science
The research referred to was co-funded by Mind Science Foundation and featured in September of 2006 in the premier scientific publication in the United States, Science, as well as the Wall Street Journal and CNN. I regard the creation of the Mind Science Foundation as the most important undertaking of my life … The human mind has tremendous unexplored potential and I want to go about the discovery and development of that potential in a scientific way. - Tom Slick Thomas Baker Tom Slick, Jr. (May 6, 1916 – October 6, 1962) was a San Antonio, Texas based inventor, businessman, adventurer, and heir to an oil business. Slick's father, Thomas Baker Slick, Sr., a.k.a. The King of the Wildcatters, had made a fortune during the Texas oil boom of the 1920s. During the 1950s, Slick was an adventurer. He turned his attention to expeditions to investigate the Loch Ness Monster, the Yeti, Bigfoot and the Trinity Alps giant salamander. [image: Inline image 1] The O’Neil Ford-designed Tom Slick house on Devine Road, San Antonio, Texas Slick founded several research organizations, beginning with the forerunner of the Texas Biomedical Research Institute in 1941. His most well-known legacy is the non-profit Southwest Research Institute (SwRI), which he founded in 1947 to seek revolutionary advancements in technology. SwRI continues to advance pure and applied science in a variety of fields from lubricant and motor fuel formulation to solar physics and planetary science. He also founded the Mind Science Foundation in San Antonio in 1958 to do consciousness research. Tom Slick: Visionary philanthropist and entrepreneur. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Slick Tom Slick Foundations: Mind Science Foundation 117 West El Prado Drive San Antonio, Texas 78212 http://www.mindscience.org/index.cfm Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research 7620 NW Loop 410 San Antonio, Texas http://www.sfbr.org/ Southwest Research Institute 6220 Culebra Road San Antonio, Texas http://www.swri.org/ Titles of interest: 'The Mystery of Consciousness' By Steven Pinker Time Magazine Special Issue, Friday, Jan. 19, 2007 http://tinyurl.com/3ck5qe This is a great dedication to a man unafraid to seek out those mysterious creatures which may or may not exist. This book should also serve as a bittersweet and stark reminder of how much progress crypto-researchers have made since Slick's time. 'Tom Slick and the Search for Yeti' by Loren Coleman Faber Faber, 1989 The ending of the book and the stories of involvement with the CIA gave great food for thought and I won't spoil anyone's enjoyment of the book by going into more detail. 'Tom Slick' True Life Encounters in Cryptozoology by Loren Coleman Linden Publishing, 2002 ...as Slick’s niece, she had rare access to family members for interviews, letters, papers and photo collections. She is a Fellow of the Explorers Club, based in New York, and like her uncle, has journeyed to remote corners of the world. When not investigating new mysteries, she lives in San Antonio, Texas. 'Tom Slick Mystery Hunter' by Catherine Nixon Cooke Paraview, 2005
[FairfieldLife] Re: Information Technology Systems
Arrest him and book him! You are fired for lying to the American people. Clear out your desk and leave the building! Officer, arrest this man and book him for serial lying. Bailiff, put this man in chains and take him for the perp walk,immediately! Mr. Biden, get on the phone with that Snowden fellow and get his pardon ready,NOW! Do it! It's not easy to pick the year's most transparent lie from the self-styled “most transparent administration in history.” There are so many to choose from—such a richness of embarrassment. For my money, the biggest presidential lie of the year came on June 7, the week after former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden revealed the agency's secret collection of call records data on millions of Americans. “I welcome this debate,” Obama proclaimed—even as his administration was hunting down the whistleblower who started it and preparing to hit him with 30 years of Espionage Act charges. Read more: 'Obama's Epic Fib About the NSA' http://reason.com/archives/2013/12/24/obamas-epic-fibs-about-the-nsa On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote: The ObamaCare disaster is not just a management failure, it's a firing incident. Where I used to work, a system failure this large would be a cause for instant dismissal: *Clean off your desk and get out, you're fired! Officer, escort this person off the premises. And, don't you ever come back! You'll never work in this town again. You fuckin' idiot!* [image: Inline image 1] 'In Defense of Kathleen Sebelius' http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303680404579141473117316190
Re: [FairfieldLife] Posting Limits
Remember, folks, according to Judy herself, Robin was posting a parody. What is the difference between lying and posting a parody? What Robin posted was a put-on that everybody took seriously, but when Richard posts a put-on, it's lying, according The Judge. Go figure. On 12/25/2013 11:02 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *Remember, folks, according to Richard himself, 99 percent of what he posts is a put-on that nobody should take seriously.* * * *Hmm, I think I'll make a macro of the above.* I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it. Run to Rick, run to Rick. If Rick doesn't like me posting then he can speak for himself and I can always post to Google Groups as much as I want to, any time I want to, as long as I want to - it's totally un-moderated. Just for the record, Judy was one of the main reasons for the posting limits in the first place. It's on record that she has been the top poster for years on FFL and previously on Google Groups. For some reason, she thinks she is the moderator of this list now. Not for nothing do they call her The Corrector. Because of her outright meanness, it's now open season on Ms Stein and now I got the people-power to stand up to her. So, put that in your pipe and smoke it. I WILL NOT BOW AND SCRAPE TO THE TYRANT! And also for the record, you and Judy are the main reasons this group has gone into the basement. I don't see anyone else here posting as much snark as you two post. Almost 50% of the posts here are just ankle-biting and snark from you two gals. It's just embarrassing. This is supposed to be an open discussion. In a social gathering, you two gals would be asked to leave for being just outright uncouth and mean-spirited.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Creating a phoney macro in NEO is much more than just phoney - it's the sure sign of a poser, desperately seeking attention. Nothing that Ms Stein posts here is to be taken seriously. NOTHING. Even her macro is a pose! Every nerd on the planet knows you can't create a macro in Microsoft Notepad. Go figure. On 12/25/2013 11:03 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Richard shoots himself in both feet: The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a phoney macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I post is to be taken seriously Yup, that'll be my new macro.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Thanks for the link,but why in the world would I need a macro to post a reply to you, or to anyone else? Like Barry, I can already key in text at a very high rate of speed - I've been playing Letter Invaders for twenty years. I will admit using this Toshiba Ultrabook with the chicklet keys slows me down some, but on a Rosewill keyboard, the one with the mechanical clicking sound, I can hit 99 WPM with one hand tied behind my back. Macros are for newbies and nerds who can't type. You'd think that after working as a professional editor out of a home office for close to thirty years, Judy would have learned one simple fact: the querty keyboard does not change - all you have to do is memorize the keyboard layout. It's not complicated. On 12/25/2013 11:22 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: BTW, Richard, if you'd like to start using macros for all your repetitive text, here's the macro program I've been using: http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro It's free for the first 30 days, then it costs $30 to register it. Installs very easily in Windows, ridiculously simple to use, at least for automating text strings. I haven't tried any of its bells and whistles for doing fancier stuff, but maybe you'll find them helpful too. Richard shoots himself in both feet: The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a phoney macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I post is to be taken seriously Yup, that'll be my new macro.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
On 12/26/2013 6:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: */If anyone on it has gone over 75 posts, the moderator just blocks their address and bans them from posting, FOREVER. /* Apparently you failed to realize that anyone can post here even if they are banned, just by altering their alias. But, thanks for your support. It looks like you've taken the filter off my posting to the group. Stay tuned for more fun in the Funny Farm Lounge - I'm just getting warmed up. I have at least 5,000 more on-topic messages from my self-published online book. Not to mention, I've just scratched the surface on my music series.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
I'm not sure how you filter out a particular person's posts when you're reading on the Web site. If you're picking and choosing only a few posts to read of the traffic generally, as Barry claims he does, then working from Message View is the way to go. But if you're going from post to post via the Next button and want to read all but one person's posts, that doesn't work, obviously. In any case, as I go through the posts, I've always skipped quickly past Richard's. These days I do have to scan them briefly since he's into telling lies about me, and not all of them are instantly discernible as such by others. I need to know which of his trolls to shut down. But thankfully, he's now cooked his own goose by admitting what I've always pointed out about him: Nothing he says is to be taken seriously. So I don't need to do much more than use a macro citing that admission as a response to all the lies.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
In the case of Judy, she's probably busy creating macros. But, seriously, if she isn't using Mozilla Thunderbird, she probably doesn't even know ho to set a filter in Yahoo Mail, even if she wanted to. It looks like she can't even figure out NEO and Yahoo Mail. Go figure. But for someone with an obsession like Judy, she probably can't afford to miss anything someone might say about her. She read every single post here in real time by probably monitoring the group messages even while she is editing for her clients. I wouldn't be surprised if her cell phone is set to sound an alarm when she gets email, even in the middle of the night. Have you noted her message response times? LoL! On 12/26/2013 6:27 AM, Share Long wrote: Brings up an interesting question: why don't Judy and Ann filter out Richard? And me and turq and feste and whoever else is on their unacceptable list. And if they don't want to delete those posts, it's simple enough to create a Maybe Read Later folder. I now have over 50 posts in my Maybe Read Later folder! On Thursday, December 26, 2013 5:49 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting LimitsLET BUCK MODERATE
In a message dated 12/26/2013 7:17:06 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com writes: I am just a humble meditator. I could help moderate this. I have shoveled a lot of shit in my lifetime. I am going to go out right now by dawn's early light before going to the morning Dome meditation to shovel some shit. I feel that by by life's fullest and long experience that I could be pretty good at moderating this list. My friends all call me Judicious by nickname. I could be quite fair enforcing a posting limit here for the good of the group. Let me have the password to FFL and I'll do it. I feel like I could serve the group well in moderation. I volunteer. Jai Brahmananda Saraswati, -Buck of the Dome
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting LimitsLET BUCK Moderate
In a message dated 12/26/2013 6:49:13 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com writes: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has ma de managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting LimitsLet Buck moderate
In a message dated 12/26/2013 6:40:17 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, turquoi...@yahoo.com writes: Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on everything said about posting limits back during the period when they were being debated as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop making 100-150 posts per week and STFU: If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently-- and *nastily*--complaining about the top posters here if they were critical of TM and supportive of Barry, rather than supportive of TM and critical of Barry, I have a nice bridge you might want to have a look at. - Judy Stein, Nov 3, 2006 In other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with her, when she was making that many to stalk other people, as she's done consistently for almost 20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns the table on her and the other Mean Girls, suddenly *she's* the one trying to sell the posting limits bridge to other people. Can you say Karma, dude? I think you can. :-) Here she is proposing the *exact same strategy* currently being used against her so effectively by Richard (bold emphasis mine): I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but it's awfully convenient for Barry that the three top posters just happen to be among his chief critics here-- so he can try to intimidate us into silence under cover of complaining about how much we post. It would be fun to see what he'd do if we were to limit our posts to criticisms of him. - Judy Stein, Nov 2, 2006 Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he has *plenty* to say, about many topics, pretty much all of them more interesting than Judy Stein. All he had to do was up his quotient of posts criticizing Judy and she goes batshit crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the people screaming for posting limits again. The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty clear-cut: NO ONE but Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered by Richard turning the tables and doing to her what she's done to so many others for so many years. NO ONE is rushing to her defense. Instead, pretty much everyone is kinda *enjoying* seeing her get a taste of her own medicine. Richard has, in fact, given the rest of us who've had to live with this woman's insanity for so long a kind of Christmas present, letting us see her demonstrate how badly she handles someone doing to her what she does to others. I therefore n ominate Richard as FFL Santa of the Year. :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
On 12/26/2013 6:51 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: */Thanks again for the Christmas present, Richard. :-)/* Judy is the gift that keeps on giving. I'm not sure I could do without her. I told her years ago Please don't feed it. But she completely ignored my plea. So, now that I'm free, you can put money on me giving her as much hell as I possible can - in payback for calling me a troll and a liar for over a decade and trying get others to shun me. Payback can be a bitch!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits Let Buck MODERATE
Let Buck moderate In a message dated 12/25/2013 11:36:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, pundits...@gmail.com writes: On 12/25/2013 10:26 PM, _authfriend@yahoo.com_ (mailto:authfri...@yahoo.com) wrote: But something really does have to be done about Richard. Here's something you could do: STFU about Richard.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
On 12/26/2013 7:33 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote: As for Richard's postings, they all look the same to me - nothing differentiates one from another, so, no offense, please, but I don't think I have read one in months. No offense, but none of my posts were addressed to you anyway. When I want to address you, I will put in the subject title Dumbass. And, anyway what could I post here that you don't already know? Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
On 12/26/2013 8:25 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *In any case, as I go through the posts, I've always skipped quickly past Richard's. These days I /do/ have to scan them briefly since he's into telling lies about me, and not all of them are instantly discernible as such by others. I need to know which of his trolls to shut down.* I knew someone was monitoring all my messages. I already knew that you read every single post of mine, and probably have for years. The joke is on you for taking me seriously for the past fourteen years. NOTHING is to be taken seriously on the internet. Thanks for all your support. Now get to work!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk me, and of course to do it with lies. In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 160-something. Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week. And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with the rest of Barry's posts this morning. But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to deal with. And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks of him.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and more people are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of operation. Even Barry is reading my messages these days. Now that's better! Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to Robin's recent post about you. You have been totally discredited and now we know who is the real stalker and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in almost every message you post these days. All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard. It's that simple. On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? */ /* */Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. /* It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk me, and of course to do it with lies. In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 160-something. Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week. And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with the rest of Barry's posts this morning. */ But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... /* */ /* *That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to deal with.* * * *And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks of him.* * *
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem.* WOW! That was a fast reply. You must be monitoring all my messages. Go figure. And, exactly how would you be knowing if any of my posts were outlandish or meaningless, if you haven't been reading them for the past fourteen years? You need to stop the fibbing, Judy, and just get some work done, before you get laid off for slacking on the job. LoL!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion
You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, pundits...@gmail.com wrote: This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of embarrassment at her behavior. I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign the integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think. Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never ending dispute. When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but with a change of attitude. So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams masked zebra wrote: In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very recently been unable to accepteven tolerate. And this was of course because of his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide with the truth, with reality. Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence. So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and Raunchydog), his judgment of me and my posts is valid as well. Now I would just ask the readers of FFLthose who have aligned themselves with Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, with Jim and othersto reconsider their position, since for someone like myself to undergo a change of perception this significant, a change which I was determined would not and could not happen, suggests something very powerful at work here. You remember Saul persecuting the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to Damascus by Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a fierce defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as spectacular a transformation of belief, I think there are parallels here, and to the extent to which Saul became Paul, I have become a very different Robin. I don't say that Barry is Jesus or anything like that. That would be absurd. And even if I did think that Barry was Christ, I know he would only have contempt for such a view of him. So, no, I won't go that far. But I will say that in the main Barry has been right all along, and even his most vitriolic and bitter posts have been in the service of somehow forcing people to see what they, like me, were blind to. Well, I have been persuaded, and in a way which really means something, that Barry is the martyr here, and I can't tell you (although Steve perhaps has somewhat had the foretaste of such a sensationbut only very mildly) how much better I feel, not just
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
A whole truckload more dishonesty from Barry: Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on everything said about posting limits back during the period when they were being debated as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop making 100-150 posts per week and STFU: If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently-- and *nastily*--complaining about the top posters here if they were critical of TM and supportive of Barry, rather than supportive of TM and critical of Barry, I have a nice bridge you might want to have a look at. - Judy Stein, Nov 3, 2006 In other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with her, when she was making that many to stalk other people, as she's done consistently for almost 20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns the table on her and the other Mean Girls, suddenly *she's* the one trying to sell the posting limits bridge to other people. Can you say Karma, dude? I think you can. :-) Well, Barry can say that, but he knows it's not true. Back then the TM critics--especially Barry--were very busy stalking the TM defenders on FFL, and the latter were significantly outnumbered by the former. There were constant, prolonged battles over TM-related issues; both sides were much more militant than they are now. That's why the TM defenders were making so many posts: we were under siege. What I wrote above that Barry quotes was right on target. Here she is proposing the *exact same strategy* currently being used against her so effectively by Richard (bold emphasis mine): Effectively is in the eye of the wishful thinker. And of course I wasn't seriously proposing any strategy in what Barry quotes: I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but it's awfully convenient for Barry that the three top posters just happen to be among his chief critics here-- so he can try to intimidate us into silence under cover of complaining about how much we post. It would be fun to see what he'd do if we were to limit our posts to criticisms of him. - Judy Stein, Nov 2, 2006 Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he has *plenty* to say, about many topics, pretty much all of them more interesting than Judy Stein. All he had to do was up his quotient of posts criticizing Judy and she goes batshit crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the people screaming for posting limits again. Well, I'm not screaming for posting limits, as Barry knows. I said explicitly that it was vanishingly unlikely we would go back to them, for several reasons (and Alex has just confirmed one of them: he isn't willing to take on limits again). And as already noted in my earlier post, Richard's criticisms of (read: lies about) me are the least of the problem. The rest of his posts are mostly not that interesting, and Barry would never in a million years suggest they were if he weren't once again turning to the tried-and-true the enemy of my enemy is my friend tactic. It's the volume of Richard's insipid posts and trolls and lies--volume just for the sake of volume--that are making FFL so unpleasant. Attention troll was Barry's entirely apt term for Richard not very long ago. The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty clear-cut: Lies are frequently simpler and clearer-cut than the reality. They're designed to be. NO ONE but Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered by Richard turning the tables and doing to her what she's done to so many others for so many years. Whoopsie-daisy. We don't know how many are bothered by Richard's excessive posting, first of all. They may not be speaking up because they don't want to become one of his targets. More importantly, Richard isn't turning the tables; what he's doing is vastly unlike what I do: his attacks consist almost exclusively of falsehoods. If I criticize somebody, I do it honestly. And Barry knows this. NO ONE is rushing to her defense. I don't need anyone to rush to my defense. I've never had any trouble handling attacks, especially ones that involve lies, as Barry knows to his sorrow. And Richard's attacks and lies are pretty pitiful. Instead, pretty much everyone is kinda *enjoying* seeing her get a taste of her own medicine. Uh-huh. We all know Barry has the siddhi of mass reading of minds, don't we, folks? My guess is that except for a few people like Feste and Share who have a big beef with me, Richard's posts (and my responses, when I make any other than the macro) are being ignored. Richard has, in fact, given the rest of us who've had to live with this woman's insanity for so long a kind of Christmas present, letting us see her demonstrate how badly she handles someone doing to her what she does to others. I therefore nominate Richard as FFL Santa of the Year. :-) Actually I've been handling Richard quite well, thank you, routinely shutting down most of his various trolling lies with that macro
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting LimitsLET BUCK B THE ADMINISTRATOR
In a message dated 12/26/2013 11:15:39 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, authfri...@yahoo.com writes: A whole truckload more dishonesty from Barry: Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on everything said about posting limits back during the period when they were being debated as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop making 100-150 posts per week and STFU: If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently-- and *nastily*--complaining about the top posters here if they were critical of TM and supportive of Barry, rather than supportive of TM and critical of Barry, I have a nice bridge you might want to have a look at. - Judy Stein, Nov 3, 2006 In other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with her, when she was making that many to stalk other people, as she's done consistently for almost 20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns the table on her and the other Mean Girls, suddenly *she's* the one trying to sell the posting limits bridge to other people. Can you say Karma, dude? I think you can. :-) Well, Barry can say that, but he knows it's not true. Back then the TM critics--especially Barry--were very busy stalking the TM defenders on FFL, and the latter were significantly outnumbered by the former. There were constant, prolonged battles over TM-related issues; both sides were much more militant than they are now. That's why the TM defenders were making so many posts: we were under siege. What I wrote above that Barry quotes was right on target. Here she is proposing the *exact same strategy* currently being used against her so effectively by Richard (bold emphasis mine): Effectively is in the eye of the wishful thinker. And of course I wasn't seriously proposing any strategy in what Barry quotes: I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but it's awfully convenient for Barry that the three top posters just happen to be among his chief critics here-- so he can try to intimidate us into silence under cover of complaining about how much we post. It would be fun to see what he'd do if we were to limit our posts to criticisms of him. - Judy Stein, Nov 2, 2006 Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he has *plenty* to say, about many topics, pretty much all of them more interesting than Judy Stein. All he had to do was up his quotient of posts criticizing Judy and she goes batshit crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the people screaming for posting limits again. Well, I'm not screaming for posting limits, as Barry knows. I said explicitly that it was vanishingly unlikely we would go back to them, for several reasons (and Alex has just confirmed one of them: he isn't willing to take on limits again). And as already noted in my earlier post, Richard's criticisms of (read: lies about) me are the least of the problem. The rest of his posts are mostly not that interesting, and Barry would never in a million years suggest they were if he weren't once again turning to the tried-and-true the enemy of my enemy is my friend tactic. It's the volume of Richard's insipid posts and trolls and lies--volume just for the sake of volume--that are making FFL so unpleasant. Attention troll was Barry's entirely apt term for Richard not very long ago. The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty clear-cut: Lies are frequently simpler and clearer-cut than the reality. They're designed to be. NO ONE but Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered by Richard turning the tables and doing to her what she's done to so many others for so many years. Whoopsie-daisy. We don't know how many are bothered by Richard's excessive posting, first of all. They may not be speaking up because they don't want to become one of his targets. More importantly, Richard isn't turning the tables; what he's doing is vastly unlike what I do: his attacks consist almost exclusively of falsehoods. If I criticize somebody, I do it honestly. And Barry knows this. NO ONE is rushing to her defense. I don't need anyone to rush to my defense. I've never had any trouble handling attacks, especially ones that involve lies, as Barry knows to his sorrow. And Richard's attacks and lies are pretty pitiful. Instead, pretty much everyone is kinda *enjoying* seeing her get a taste of her own medicine. Uh-huh. We all know Barry has the siddhi of mass reading of minds, don't we, folks? My guess is that except for a few people like Feste and Share who have a big beef with me, Richard's posts (and my responses, when I make any other than the macro) are being ignored. Richard has, in fact, given the rest of us who've had to live with this woman's insanity for so long a kind of Christmas present, letting us see her demonstrate how badly she handles someone doing to her what she does to others. I therefore nominate Richard as
Re: [FairfieldLife] A scene from our modern American Christmas
noozguru, what would really be funny is if they were texting one another! But I can definitely relate. On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 2:29 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Compliments of the Onion (and it looks about like what last night was at my relatives): http://www.theonion.com/articles/relatives-gather-from-across-the-country-to-stare,34842/ The family that texts together stays together.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
Sez Barry, knowing I didn't ask for posting limits, I pointed out to Ann that we weren't going to get them (as Alex has confirmed). As he also knows, the posting limits were not invented just for me by any means. The sign of a chronic, compulsive stalker-liar is that he isn't selective in what he lies about and ends up telling falsehoods that are ridiculously easily refuted, making him even less credible. I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. I completely understand, and please remember that *I* am not the person asking for posting limits again. Hilariously, it's the person who *they were invented for* asking for them. That said, I *can* think of a more low maintenance version of the Posting Limit, should anyone want to take over your function. This version only requires the moderator to look at one Post Count post per week, the one that comes out after Friday night and that contains the weekly totals. If anyone on it has gone over 75 posts, the moderator just blocks their address and bans them from posting, FOREVER. I already know who the first three people to go would be, and Richard wouldn't be one of them. :-) ---In FairfieldLife@{{evilDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
More lies from the wimp: Brings up an interesting question: why don't Judy and Ann filter out Richard? And me and turq and feste and whoever else is on their unacceptable list. Especially if, *as they claim*, neither they nor anyone else here takes what any of us says seriously. I don't believe we made such a blanket claim, actually. About Barry and Richard, yes. I go after Barry because it's fun to expose him over and over again as someone who is not to be taken seriously, as I'm doing now. Seems to me they take it VERY seriously indeed. *They*, ironically, are the only ones now lobbying for posting limits to cut down the number of things said about them. Talk about Egos In A Panic. :-) Talk about one inflated but very shaky ego on a bender of wishful thinking. I wasn't lobbying for posting limits, as Barry knows, because it would be futile. And as I've already said, if the only posts Richard were making were the ones stalking Ann and me, we wouldn't have any problem dealing with that. The irony of it all is just too delicious. The very person the FFL Posting Limits were invented FOR Not, as Barry knows. is now crying like a baby Uh, no, Barry. I'm laughing at you, as usual. and calling for them again, Not, as Barry knows. to keep someone from doing to her what *she* was doing to many others back when they first invented the Posting Limits to get *her* to lighten up. As I've already noted, and as Barry knows, I don't lie when I criticize somebody, nor do I troll. Richard does both, so he is NOT doing to me what I've done to others. It's amazing the number of lies Barry can churn out in just a few posts, isn't it? Thanks again for the Christmas present, Richard. :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion
I did reply to that post, it was a parody--the whole exchange was a parody--and the host of monkeys that just flew out of your butt are throwing poo at you. For the record, for those who may not remember: Robin didn't leave FFL until almost three weeks later, and he left because of a brutally cruel post from Curtis commenting on Robin's Open Letter about having struck his students. Richard knows all this. As he himself has admitted, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of embarrassment at her behavior. I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign the integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think. Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never ending dispute. When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but with a change of attitude. So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams masked zebra wrote: In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very recently been unable to accepteven tolerate. And this was of course because of his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide with the truth, with reality. Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence. So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and Raunchydog), his judgment of me and my posts is valid as well. Now I would just ask the readers of FFLthose who have aligned themselves with Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, with Jim and othersto reconsider their position, since for someone like myself to undergo a change of perception this significant, a change which I was determined would not and could not happen, suggests something very powerful at work here. You remember Saul persecuting the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to Damascus by Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a fierce defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as spectacular a transformation of belief, I think there are parallels here, and to the extent to which Saul became Paul, I have become a very different Robin. I don't say that Barry is Jesus or anything like that. That would be absurd. And even if I did think that Barry was Christ, I know he would only have
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote: You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure. I have it right from the horse's mouth (Robin's) that this was a parody. Go figure. I even have it documented in a private email. Go figure some more. On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of embarrassment at her behavior. I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign the integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think. Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never ending dispute. When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but with a change of attitude. So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams masked zebra wrote: In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very recently been unable to accepteven tolerate. And this was of course because of his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide with the truth, with reality. Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence. So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and Raunchydog), his judgment of me and my posts is valid as well. Now I would just ask the readers of FFLthose who have aligned themselves with Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, with Jim and othersto reconsider their position, since for someone like myself to undergo a change of perception this significant, a change which I was determined would not and could not happen, suggests something very powerful at work here. You remember Saul persecuting the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to Damascus by Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a fierce defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as spectacular a transformation of belief, I think there are parallels here, and to the extent to which Saul became Paul, I have become a very different Robin. I don't say that Barry is Jesus or anything like that. That would be absurd. And even if I did think that Barry was Christ, I know he would only have contempt for such a view of him. So, no, I won't go that far. But I will say that in the main Barry has been right all along, and even his most vitriolic and bitter posts have been in the service of somehow forcing people to see what they, like me, were blind to. Well,
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, awoelflebater@... wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote: You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure. I have it right from the horse's mouth (Robin's) that this was a parody. Go figure. I even have it documented in a private email. Go figure some more. Oh, BTW, that monkey needs a bath. On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of embarrassment at her behavior. I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign the integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think. Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never ending dispute. When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but with a change of attitude. So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams masked zebra wrote: In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very recently been unable to accepteven tolerate. And this was of course because of his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide with the truth, with reality. Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence. So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and Raunchydog), his judgment of me and my posts is valid as well. Now I would just ask the readers of FFLthose who have aligned themselves with Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, with Jim and othersto reconsider their position, since for someone like myself to undergo a change of perception this significant, a change which I was determined would not and could not happen, suggests something very powerful at work here. You remember Saul persecuting the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to Damascus by Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a fierce defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as spectacular a transformation of belief, I think there are parallels here, and to the extent to which Saul became Paul, I have become a very different Robin. I don't say that Barry is Jesus or anything like that. That would be absurd. And even if I did think that Barry was Christ, I know he would only have contempt for such a view of him. So, no, I won't go that far. But I will say that in the main Barry has been right all along, and even his most vitriolic and bitter
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and more people are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of operation. Even Barry is reading my messages these days. Now that's better! Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to Robin's recent post about you. You have been totally discredited and now we know who is the real stalker and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in almost every message you post these days. All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard. It's that simple. On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk me, and of course to do it with lies. In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 160-something. Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week. And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with the rest of Barry's posts this morning. But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to deal with. And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks of him.
Re: [FairfieldLife] A scene from our modern American Christmas
My great nephew showed me a video clip of me reciting a Vedic grace from Thanksgiving he posted on Vine. They always request me to recite it. I asked him who the old guy was in the video. On 12/26/2013 08:19 AM, Share Long wrote: noozguru, what would really be funny is if they were texting one another! But I can definitely relate. On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 2:29 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Compliments of the Onion (and it looks about like what last night was at my relatives): http://www.theonion.com/articles/relatives-gather-from-across-the-country-to-stare,34842/ The family that texts together stays together.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity. It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
That's pretty damned funny Richard. I don't mean to be an enabler, but I'm gonna come out of hiding for this one.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits Let Buck MODERATE
It's a wonder you and Buck can even turn on a computer let alone read FFL. Maybe 15 lifetimes from now Buck will be ready to moderate a Yahoo Group.:-D On 12/26/2013 06:36 AM, wle...@aol.com wrote: Let Buck moderate In a message dated 12/25/2013 11:36:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, pundits...@gmail.com writes: On 12/25/2013 10:26 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: But something really does have to be done about Richard. Here's something you could do: STFU about Richard.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Feliz Navidad to everyone!
Richard, Ann's just upset that I caught her trying to pass off last year's tree photo as this years! Plus I revealed her lie about my living in a 1 BR flat.
[FairfieldLife] Back on alt.meditation.transcendental...
...people used to refer to Judy as Barry's Wind-Up Toy. That's because she seems to be run by an ego so fragile and so easily threatened that it feels it HAS to respond to anything said about who she is that doesn't jibe with her fantasies of who she is. She fell it every time I -- or anyone else, for that matter -- trolled her back then, and she still does, all these years later. Think about how *many* posts she's made in the last few weeks responding to Richard's *obvious* attempts to...wait for it...GET HER TO RESPOND. Richard is WINNING here, folks. He doesn't really CARE what people think of him. Judy does. In spades. That's what makes her weak, and so easily controlled. It really GETS to her when someone has been allowed to say something about her that doesn't jibe with her internal fantasies of how much smarter she is than anyone else here, how much more integrity she has than anyone else here, and how much more she knows (knows: a euphemism for 'I Googled it') than anyone else here. And yet, if she was all that, would she be so concerned about every little Richard post as to spend the amount of time, energy, and posts she has spent in the last few weeks responding to what even *she* calls trolls? Judy is trollbait, and Richard is now the master troll. He *owns* her silly ass. I renounce all previous titles, and henceforth declare Judy Richard's Wind-Up Toy. :-)
[FairfieldLife] RE: Back on alt.meditation.transcendental...
I renounce all previous titles, and henceforth declare Judy Richard's Wind-Up Toy. :-) Another funny, (objectively speaking)
Re: [FairfieldLife] A scene from our modern American Christmas
I know what you mean. As I watch the great nieces and nephews going off to college!, I'm more aware of the passing of time. And my family in general is dismayed about my longer hair. Evidently older women should not have hair beyond shoulder length! On Thursday, December 26, 2013 10:55 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote: My great nephew showed me a video clip of me reciting a Vedic grace from Thanksgiving he posted on Vine. They always request me to recite it. I asked him who the old guy was in the video. On 12/26/2013 08:19 AM, Share Long wrote: noozguru, what would really be funny is if they were texting one another! But I can definitely relate. On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 2:29 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Compliments of the Onion (and it looks about like what last night was at my relatives): http://www.theonion.com/articles/relatives-gather-from-across-the-country-to-stare,34842/ The family that texts together stays together.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Windows Phone 8
Ever since Microsoft used the Rolling Stones Start Me Up to advertise Windows 95 shutting down Windows has pretty much remained the same with slight (sometimes annoying) variations. To vary it so much with Windows 8 is poor design. On 12/25/2013 06:44 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote: On 12/25/2013 11:41 AM, Bhairitu wrote: He was particularly trying to figure out how to shut the notebook down since. How to shut down a computer running Windows 8. It's not complicated: 1. Mouse over the little gadget in the lower right corner of the screen. (You can also move your mouse cursor to the upper left corner; same result. Or, you can press Windows - C on your keyboard.) 2. In the slide-out menu (known as the Charms Bar) that appears, click Settings. 3. Click the Power button, and then click your desired action: Sleep, Shut down, or Update and restart.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Because of all the repetition in your posts. You could make a macro of Go figure, for instance, and assign it to a single key. No matter how fast you type, a single key press would be faster. Thanks for the link,but why in the world would I need a macro to post a reply to you, or to anyone else? Like Barry, I can already key in text at a very high rate of speed - I've been playing Letter Invaders for twenty years. I will admit using this Toshiba Ultrabook with the chicklet keys slows me down some, but on a Rosewill keyboard, the one with the mechanical clicking sound, I can hit 99 WPM with one hand tied behind my back. Macros are for newbies and nerds who can't type. You'd think that after working as a professional editor out of a home office for close to thirty years, Judy would have learned one simple fact: the querty keyboard does not change - all you have to do is memorize the keyboard layout. It's not complicated. Does your keyboard have the u key instead of the w key next to the q key? I've used dozens of keyboards in my time, and none of them were querty keyboards. Opsie... guffaw On 12/25/2013 11:22 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: BTW, Richard, if you'd like to start using macros for all your repetitive text, here's the macro program I've been using: http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro It's free for the first 30 days, then it costs $30 to register it. Installs very easily in Windows, ridiculously simple to use, at least for automating text strings. I haven't tried any of its bells and whistles for doing fancier stuff, but maybe you'll find them helpful too. Richard shoots himself in both feet: The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a phoney macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I post is to be taken seriously Yup, that'll be my new macro.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion
You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure. I have it right from the horse's mouth (Robin's) that this was a parody. Go figure. I even have it documented in a private email. Go figure some more. Whoops, watch out for the monkeys flying out of Richard's butt! They're pelting him with poo, but they're laughing so hard at him that their aim is a bit off. You don't want to get in the line of fire. Robin and I called that exchange our irony duel in private. We were pretty pleased with ourselves, I must confess.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
Gee, Bhairitu, Barry was extremely fond of the posting limits. You don't mean to suggest he's spiritually immature, do you? The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity. It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@... mailto:j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Back on alt.meditation.transcendental...
...people used to refer to Judy as Barry's Wind-Up Toy. Actually, Barry used to refer to me that way, especially after having been particularly uncomfortably wound up by me. Don't think he fooled anybody, though. That's because she seems to be run by an ego so fragile and so easily threatened that it feels it HAS to respond to anything said about who she is that doesn't jibe with her fantasies of who she is. As I've already pointed out, I go after Barry to expose him as a liar and a fantasist. Whether the lies and fantasies in any given instance are about me or somebody else, or even something having nothing to do with FFL members, is incidental. The above and what follows below are just the usual fantasies about me he's been indulging in for the last 18 years to console himself for always being the loser. She fell it every time I -- or anyone else, for that matter -- trolled her back then, and she still does, all these years later. Think about how *many* posts she's made in the last few weeks responding to Richard's *obvious* attempts to...wait for it...GET HER TO RESPOND. Richard is WINNING here, folks. He doesn't really CARE what people think of him. Judy does. In spades. That's what makes her weak, and so easily controlled. It really GETS to her when someone has been allowed to say something about her that doesn't jibe with her internal fantasies of how much smarter she is than anyone else here, how much more integrity she has than anyone else here, and how much more she knows (knows: a euphemism for 'I Googled it') than anyone else here. And yet, if she was all that, would she be so concerned about every little Richard post as to spend the amount of time, energy, and posts she has spent in the last few weeks responding to what even *she* calls trolls? Judy is trollbait, and Richard is now the master troll. He *owns* her silly ass. I renounce all previous titles, and henceforth declare Judy Richard's Wind-Up Toy. :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote: You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure. I have it right from the horse's mouth (Robin's) that this was a parody. Go figure. I even have it documented in a private email. Go figure some more. Whoops, watch out for the monkeys flying out of Richard's butt! They're pelting him with poo, but they're laughing so hard at him that their aim is a bit off. You don't want to get in the line of fire. Robin and I called that exchange our irony duel in private. We were pretty pleased with ourselves, I must confess. Yes, it was one of the first times that he really had a good chuckle with me about this conversation between you two. He thought it was bloody hilarious and I don't really think he imagined for a moment that anyone would take it seriously. However, he didn't care what anyone believed, I don't think, he just was having far too much fun with you on this one. I don't think he realized how irony challenged many people are at FFL or even how they would be willing to, at any opportunity, use the seeming ambiguity of whether or not it was irony, to some silly advantage to win an argument.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Gee, Bhairitu, Barry was extremely fond of the posting limits. You don't mean to suggest he's spiritually immature, do you? As Bhairitu is probably aware, Barry was fond of the posting limits because Judy was not. They *were*, after all, created with the express purpose of trying to teach Judy and two others some self-control. Knowing that she in particular had none, I saw them as a way to get her to reveal how *little* self-control she really has. Who is the frequent poster who, during the entire lifespan of the Posting Limits, never overposted, even once? (That would be moi.) Who is the frequent poster who posted out and wound up sitting on the Got No Self Control Bench more than all but one other poster? (That would be Judy. She spent as I remember eight *weeks* sitting on that bench because she couldn't control herself.) How could I *not* like a setup like that? I'd wind her up, and more often than not she'd lose SO much control that she'd post out and we'd be free of her for a week. :-) Now there are no more Posting Limits, so that opportunity for fun is beyond us. But now Richard has taken over as Wind-Up Master anyway, so he's free to make Judy dance any way he wants to. :-) The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity. It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@ mailto:j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{evilDomain}}, authfriend@ mailto:authfriend@ wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Back on alt.meditation.transcendental...
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, steve.sundur@... wrote: I renounce all previous titles, and henceforth declare Judy Richard's Wind-Up Toy. :-) Another funny, (objectively speaking) Oh no Steve, I do believe Ricky is Sharon's wind-up toy. All we need now is a screwdriver to tighten all the loose screws.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Feliz Navidad to everyone!
No, Share, Ann wasn't upset about the tree photo. Nor did she lie about your flat. Uncle Feste will be disappointed in you for not having absorbed his explication of what lying means. People who have been caught in falsehoods, as I pointed out not long ago, have a tendency to misuse the term lie in the hope of making the person who caught them look as bad as they do. You do this, Barry does this, Richard does this. It's malicious and cowardly and deeply dishonest. Richard, Ann's just upset that I caught her trying to pass off last year's tree photo as this years! Plus I revealed her lie about my living in a 1 BR flat.
[FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; let's review what we know about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor; second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model - although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing; third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers, teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF; fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few - tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap - just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR. And with our best wishes, here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and keeping supper warm: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE Go figure!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
I have always been opposed to posting limits because they display a lack of maturity and ability to use the Internet. I only created the post count script because people weren't even adult enough to maintain their own count. And like I often said to Alex, if he were to mention to the Yahoo crew that we had posting limits they would have astonishingly responded you have what? On 12/26/2013 09:19 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *Gee, Bhairitu, Barry was /extremely/ fond of the posting limits. You don't mean to suggest he's spiritually immature, do you?* The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity. It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@... mailto:j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
Gee, Bhairitu, Barry was extremely fond of the posting limits. You don't mean to suggest he's spiritually immature, do you? As Bhairitu is probably aware, Barry was fond of the posting limits because Judy was not. This is one of the very few true things Barry has said in this discussion. He saw the posting limits as a chance to stalk me to get back at me for my criticisms of him, as well as cutting down on the number of criticisms. He didn't, and doesn't, care about how many posts folks make except to the extent it gives him something to stalk the people he doesn't like about. It's completely opportunistic. Barry's count of the number of times various people posted out was even more flawed than his purported counts usually are. It was impossible for him to access enough of the data to get an accurate count, and he acknowledged this when he posted it. That fact appears to have gone conveniently down his memory hole. In any case, eight is way too high for me. The rest of this is just more of Barry's endless fantasizing. They *were*, after all, created with the express purpose of trying to teach Judy and two others some self-control. Knowing that she in particular had none, I saw them as a way to get her to reveal how *little* self-control she really has. Who is the frequent poster who, during the entire lifespan of the Posting Limits, never overposted, even once? (That would be moi.) Who is the frequent poster who posted out and wound up sitting on the Got No Self Control Bench more than all but one other poster? (That would be Judy. She spent as I remember eight *weeks* sitting on that bench because she couldn't control herself.) How could I *not* like a setup like that? I'd wind her up, and more often than not she'd lose SO much control that she'd post out and we'd be free of her for a week. :-) Now there are no more Posting Limits, so that opportunity for fun is beyond us. But now Richard has taken over as Wind-Up Master anyway, so he's free to make Judy dance any way he wants to. :-) The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity. It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@ mailto:j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{evilDomain}}, authfriend@ mailto:authfriend@ wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie! On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 9:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote: Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a liar or he has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin its a parody of Judy - she can't seem to understand that she is the butt of everyone's joke and has been for years. If what Robin said was a parody, Judy seemed to miss it, since she failed to post a single comment about it after Robin left the group. What Judy doesn't realize is that she is the reason Robin left. Poor Ricky Retardo. The reason Robin left was because he had much more important things to do, things that would be far and away beyond your comprehension or your depth. I have this on the highest authority. Why not obsess on something else for a while? I know, why don't you and Sharon discuss what you talk about best - nothing. On 12/25/2013 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote: Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed with attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You attribute the worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the case. It is quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here in the past (I don't follow your links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie has to be deliberate. The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions expressed may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false accusations. There is no need to respond with links that prove what you are saying, because unlike you I have no interest in going back to the archives to check on something I may have said a long time ago. Who cares? Only you. The truth is that you are a malicious individual who has an obsessive need to brand people you do not like as liars. It is a very ugly trait, auth. Of course you are unable to see it for yourself, but again I ask you: Why do so many people on this forum despise you? Why are you always involved in arguments here in which everyone is a liar except you? The best thing you could do now would be to apologize for your insulting language toward me, but that would require a level of decency on your part that you have never before shown. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote: (Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?) In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the reasons for your need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.) So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind words. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote: If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that. Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: for Emily Bob, to thank Richard, Share finally replies about Ann's tree photo
I support Richard because not only are his posts humorous and interesting and having good spiritual knowledge, but they are also kind, for the most part. He even says that you are probably nice in person. On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 4:03 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: You support Richard, who has more fantasies about me and Ann and others than I can count. What's up with that, Share? Why don't you correct his fantasies too? And Barry's? Not to mention your own fantasies about us. Who's living in a fantasy world? Seems kinda inconsistent, don't you think? Like, hypocritical? Actually I live in a 2 BR, 1 1/2 bath townhouse with dining room and breakfast nook. The rest is also Ann's fantasy about me. On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 3:05 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: On 12/24/2013 10:51 AM, awoelflebater@... wrote: Judy, there is a reason Share is living alone as an older woman in a one-bedroom flat in the middle of Iowa. And it's not because she chose this. You mean compared to an even older woman working out of a home office near a beach in New Jersey, and not because she chose this?
[FairfieldLife] Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr Collaborate for Meditation in Schools
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJg5mKuCh7A http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJg5mKuCh7A
[FairfieldLife] Christmas Carols at Mass
The first time I went to Christmas Day Mass since all of my adult lifetime. What Jyotish significance is that? :)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Classical Masterpieces
Johann Strauss II [image: Inline image 1] The Blue Danube Waltz - Vienna Philharmonic - Vals del Danubio Azul http://youtu.be/_CTYymbbEL4 Tales from the Vienna Woods - Brazil Orquestra Filarmônica, Belo Horizonte http://youtu.be/MaOVp8FfGRo Johann Strauss II was an Austrian composer of light music, particularly dance music and operettas. He composed over 400 waltzes, polkas, quadrilles, and other types of dance music, as well as several operettas and a ballet. In his lifetime, he was known as The Waltz King, and was largely then responsible for the popularity of the waltz in Vienna during the 19th century. Some of Johann Strauss's most famous works include The Blue Danube, and Tales from the Vienna Woods. Read more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Strauss_II On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote: Richard Wagner [image: Inline image 1] Rienzi Overture (Full) - The Symphony Orchestra of the LISZT School of Music, Weimar http://youtu.be/URIwWtwn6qA Wilhelm Richard Wagner was a German composer, theater director, polemicist, and conductor who is primarily known for his operas. Wagner revolutionized opera through his concept of the Gesamtkunstwerk (total work of art), by which he sought to synthesis the poetic, visual, musical and dramatic arts, with music subsidiary to drama, and which was announced in a series of essays between 1849 and 1852. Wagner realized these ideas most fully in the first half of the four-opera cycle Der Ring des Nibelungen (The Ring of the Nibelung). Read more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Wagner A note on Wagner: Apparently Wagner wore pink underwear, climbed trees, and liked to stand on his head. To match his pink pink underwear he often wore satin breeches, a pink eiderdown-padded house robe and pink slippers with the rose bouquets. In spite of this, some people think he wrote some nice music. Go figure. As a young college student I listened to several of his operas (works) in two courses of music appreciation. I attended this course twice so that I could get the perspective from two different professors of music. We would sit here for hours listening to the arias,which were translated,probably because nobody in the class could understand all those complicated German words. You can always tell a genuine Wagner opera because they last for hours on end when performed on the stage. One critic at the time wrote about a Wagner opera: Of all the clumsy,lumbering, boggling, baboon-blooded stuff I ever saw on a human stage; of all the affected, sapless, soul-less, beginingless, endless, topless, bottomless, topsy-turviest doggerel of sound I ever endured the deadliness of,that eternity of nothing was the deadliest. Work cited: 'Lives of the Musical Greats' by Victor Borge Doubleday-Tarcher, 1971 p. 119 On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote: Igor Stravinsky [image: Inline image 2] The Firebird - Gergiev · Vienna Philarmonic http://youtu.be/RZkIAVGlfWk Petrushka - Boston Symphony Orchestra http://youtu.be/ZZIEKCN-rIU The Rite of Spring (Le Sacre du printemps) - Leonard Bernstein http://youtu.be/5Kyso5VmZ6g Igor Stravinsky is considered to be one of the most important and influential composers of the 20th century. Stravinsky's compositional career was notable for its stylistic diversity. He first achieved international fame with three ballets commissioned by the impresario Sergei Diaghilev and first performed in Paris by Diaghilev's Ballets Russes: The Firebird (1910), Petrushka (1911) and The Rite of Spring (1913). Stravinsky was named by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people of the century. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igor_Stravinsky On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote: [image: Inline image 1] Aram Khachaturian - Sabre Dance, Seiji Ozawa http://youtu.be/ejIk_Za-q4Y Sabre Dance is a movement in the final act of the ballet Gayane (1942) by Aram Khachaturian. It is considered Khachaturian's most famous work. It is based on Armenian folk music, especially its middle section. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabre_Dance [image: Inline image 2] Aram Khachaturian was a Soviet Armenian composer. Alongside Sergei Prokofiev and Dmitri Shostakovich, Khachaturian is sometimes called one of the three 'titans' of Soviet music. He is also considered 'one of the major musicians' of the 20th century. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aram_Khachaturian On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: [image: Inline image 3] Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - Piano Concerto No. 21 in C Andante (2nd Movement) - Daniel Barenboim http://youtu.be/DRCEwy5XQSs The second movement was featured in the 1967 Swedish film Elvira Madigan. Elvira Madigan is a 1967 Swedish film directed by Bo Widerberg, based on the tragedy of the Danish
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
Apparently Bob learned nothing from Robin, not even how to form a break between paragraphs. Get back to us Bob, after you take a few computer lessons at a community college. Thanks for the post, but I don't have time to reformat for easier reading. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpri...@yahoo.com wrote: Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; *let's review what we know* about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor; second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model - although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing; third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers, teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF; fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few - tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap - just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR. And with our best wishes, here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and keeping supper warm: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE Go figure!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Ann has some pretty deep-seated prejudices - I tried to advise her of this, but apparently she is under the Judy spell: combative and nasty and just plain old mean-spirited. She seemed pretty nice back when Robin was around - Iwonder if that had any effect on her writing style. It looks like we are down to just two writers on the forum, Barry and Richard. Judy, with some help from Ann, got rid of all the other good writers - Vaj, Curtis, and Robin. Bill has a lot of promise - he obviously knows a lot, but he is busy earning a living and that's a good thing. I'm sure he has better things to do than try to give any knowledge to Judy. Bill knocked her off as a poser a long time ago. On 12/26/2013 12:03 PM, Share Long wrote: With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie! On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 9:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote: Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a liar or he has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin its a parody of Judy - she can't seem to understand that she is the butt of everyone's joke and has been for years. If what Robin said was a parody, Judy seemed to miss it, since she failed to post a single comment about it after Robin left the group. What Judy doesn't realize is that she is the reason Robin left. Poor Ricky Retardo. The reason Robin left was because he had much more important things to do, things that would be far and away beyond your comprehension or your depth. I have this on the highest authority. Why not obsess on something else for a while? I know, why don't you and Sharon discuss what you talk about best - nothing. On 12/25/2013 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote: Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed with attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You attribute the worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the case. It is quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here in the past (I don't follow your links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie has to be deliberate. The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions expressed may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false accusations. There is no need to respond with links that prove what you are saying, because unlike you I have no interest in going back to the archives to check on something I may have said a long time ago. Who cares? Only you. The truth is that you are a malicious individual who has an obsessive need to brand people you do not like as liars. It is a very ugly trait, auth. Of course you are unable to see it for yourself, but again I ask you: Why do so many people on this forum despise you? Why are you always involved in arguments here in which everyone is a liar except you? The best thing you could do now would be to apologize for your insulting language toward me, but that would require a level of decency on your part that you have never before shown. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: *(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)* * * *In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the reasons for your need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)* So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind words. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: *If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back any further than that.* Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported defection from me to Barry. At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity. In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work, Barry! On 12/26/2013 10:14 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: A whole truckload more dishonesty from Barry: */ Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on everything said about posting limits back during the period when they were being debated as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop making 100-150 posts per week and STFU: /* If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently-- and *nastily*--complaining about the top posters here if they were critical of TM and supportive of Barry, rather than supportive of TM and critical of Barry, I have a nice bridge you might want to have a look at. - Judy Stein, Nov 3, 2006 */ In other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with her, when she was making that many to stalk other people, as she's done consistently for almost 20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns the table on her and the other Mean Girls, suddenly *she's* the one trying to sell the posting limits bridge/**/ to other people./* */Can you say Karma, dude? I think you can. :-) /* Well, Barry can say that, but he knows it's not true. Back then the TM critics--especially Barry--were very busy stalking the TM defenders on FFL, and the latter were significantly outnumbered by the former. There were constant, prolonged battles over TM-related issues; both sides were much more militant than they are now. That's why the TM defenders were making so many posts: we were under siege. What I wrote above that Barry quotes was right on target. */ Here she is proposing the *exact same strategy* currently being used against her so effectively by Richard (bold emphasis mine): /* Effectively is in the eye of the wishful thinker. And of course I wasn't seriously proposing any strategy in what Barry quotes: I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but it's awfully convenient for Barry that the three top posters just happen to be among his chief critics here-- so he can try to intimidate us into silence under cover of complaining about how much we post. * It would be fun to see what he'd do if we were to limit our posts to criticisms of him.* - Judy Stein, Nov 2, 2006 */ Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he has *plenty* to say, about many topics, pretty much all of them more interesting than Judy Stein. All he had to do was up his quotient of posts criticizing Judy and she goes batshit crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the people screaming for posting limits again. /* Well, I'm not screaming for posting limits, as Barry knows. I said explicitly that it was vanishingly unlikely we would go back to them, for several reasons (and Alex has just confirmed one of them: he isn't willing to take on limits again). And as already noted in my earlier post, Richard's criticisms of (read: lies about) me are the least of the problem. The rest of his posts are mostly not that interesting, and Barry would never in a million years suggest they were if he weren't once again turning to the tried-and-true the enemy of my enemy is my friend tactic. It's the volume of Richard's insipid posts and trolls and lies--volume just for the sake of volume--that are making FFL so unpleasant. Attention troll was Barry's entirely apt term for Richard not very long ago. */ The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty clear-cut: /* */ /* Lies are frequently simpler and clearer-cut than the reality. They're designed to be. */ /* */ NO ONE but Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered by Richard turning the tables and doing to her what she's done to so many others for so many years. /* Whoopsie-daisy. We don't know how many are bothered by Richard's excessive posting, first of all. They may not be speaking up because they don't want to become one of his targets. More importantly, Richard isn't turning the tables; what he's doing is vastly unlike what I do: his attacks consist almost exclusively of falsehoods. If I criticize somebody, I do it honestly. And Barry knows this. */ NO ONE is rushing to her defense. /* */ /* *I don't need anyone to rush to my defense. I've never had any trouble handling attacks, especially ones that involve lies, as Barry knows to his sorrow. And Richard's attacks and lies are pretty pitiful.* */ /* */ Instead, pretty much everyone is kinda *enjoying* seeing her get a taste of her own medicine. /* Uh-huh. We all know Barry has the siddhi of mass reading of minds, don't we, folks? My guess is that except for a few people like Feste and Share who have a big beef with me, Richard's posts (and my responses, when I make any other than the macro) are being ignored. */ Richard has, in fact, given the rest of us who've had to live with this woman's insanity for so long a kind of Christmas present, letting us see her demonstrate how badly she handles someone doing to her what
Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard
---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote: Apparently Bob learned nothing from Robin, not even how to form a break between paragraphs. Get back to us Bob, after you take a few computer lessons at a community college. Thanks for the post, but I don't have time to reformat for easier reading. Go figure. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote: Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; let's review what we know about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor; second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model - although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing; third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers, teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF; fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few - tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap - just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR. And with our best wishes, here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and keeping supper warm: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE Go figure!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
Maybe Barry was posting a parody. Judy is easily the target of a parody, as Robin demonstrated. Apparently Judy will fall for any parody, even one by Robin that looks like the truth. Go figure. Everyone knows that Judy was the top poster around here for years - she can't resist posting some snarky reply to just about every post submitted. But, when someone posts something on topic, she just ignores it. Why? Because she knows next to nothing about yoga or meditation, obviously, or even music for that matter. par·o·dy verb past tense: parodied; past participle: parodied 1. produce a humorously exaggerated imitation of (a writer, artist, or genre). On 12/26/2013 10:22 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: Sez Barry, knowing I didn't ask for posting limits, I pointed out to Ann that we weren't going to get them (as Alex has confirmed). As he also knows, the posting limits were not invented just for me by any means. The sign of a chronic, compulsive stalker-liar is that he isn't selective in what he lies about and ends up telling falsehoods that are ridiculously easily refuted, making him even less credible. I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. */I completely understand, and please remember that *I* am not the person asking for posting limits again. Hilariously, it's the person who *they were invented for* asking for them. That said, I *can* think of a more low maintenance version of the Posting Limit, should anyone want to take over your function. This version only requires the moderator to look at one Post Count post per week, the one that comes out after Friday night and that contains the weekly totals. If anyone on it has gone over 75 posts, the moderator just blocks their address and bans them from posting, FOREVER. I already know who the first three people to go would be, and Richard wouldn't be one of them. :-) /* ---In FairfieldLife@{{evilDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
Posting limits are for complainers.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
On 12/26/2013 10:38 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *the only posts Richard were making were the ones stalking Ann and me* You need to stop the lying, Ms Stein. For the record, Judy has been stalking me for over a decade. The proof is in the archives. I came over here long before Judy, to try to get away from her, but here she is, posting the same old snarky comments, except now she has a macro running in Microsoft Notepad. Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Christmas Carols at Mass
depends Obbajee, did you receive Communion, just wafer or both wafer and wine (-: On Thursday, December 26, 2013 12:27 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: The first time I went to Christmas Day Mass since all of my adult lifetime. What Jyotish significance is that? :)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote: Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work, Barry! You reminded me how easy it is TO push her buttons, so I figured I'd add to your work. :-) The most fascinating thing about it all, from a psychological point of view, is that Judy actually thinks she's winning. So does Ann. But then, both of them are so clueless that they climbed all over themselves to see who could kiss Robin's ass the most. Not exactly the brightest candles on the cake. On 12/26/2013 10:14 AM, authfriend@... wrote: A whole truckload more dishonesty from Barry: */ Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on everything said about posting limits back during the period when they were being debated as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop making 100-150 posts per week and STFU: /* If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently-- and *nastily*--complaining about the top posters here if they were critical of TM and supportive of Barry, rather than supportive of TM and critical of Barry, I have a nice bridge you might want to have a look at. - Judy Stein, Nov 3, 2006 */ In other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with her, when she was making that many to stalk other people, as she's done consistently for almost 20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns the table on her and the other Mean Girls, suddenly *she's* the one trying to sell the posting limits bridge/**/ to other people./* */Can you say Karma, dude? I think you can. :-) /* Well, Barry can say that, but he knows it's not true. Back then the TM critics--especially Barry--were very busy stalking the TM defenders on FFL, and the latter were significantly outnumbered by the former. There were constant, prolonged battles over TM-related issues; both sides were much more militant than they are now. That's why the TM defenders were making so many posts: we were under siege. What I wrote above that Barry quotes was right on target. */ Here she is proposing the *exact same strategy* currently being used against her so effectively by Richard (bold emphasis mine): /* Effectively is in the eye of the wishful thinker. And of course I wasn't seriously proposing any strategy in what Barry quotes: I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but it's awfully convenient for Barry that the three top posters just happen to be among his chief critics here-- so he can try to intimidate us into silence under cover of complaining about how much we post. * It would be fun to see what he'd do if we were to limit our posts to criticisms of him.* - Judy Stein, Nov 2, 2006 */ Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he has *plenty* to say, about many topics, pretty much all of them more interesting than Judy Stein. All he had to do was up his quotient of posts criticizing Judy and she goes batshit crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the people screaming for posting limits again. /* Well, I'm not screaming for posting limits, as Barry knows. I said explicitly that it was vanishingly unlikely we would go back to them, for several reasons (and Alex has just confirmed one of them: he isn't willing to take on limits again). And as already noted in my earlier post, Richard's criticisms of (read: lies about) me are the least of the problem. The rest of his posts are mostly not that interesting, and Barry would never in a million years suggest they were if he weren't once again turning to the tried-and-true the enemy of my enemy is my friend tactic. It's the volume of Richard's insipid posts and trolls and lies--volume just for the sake of volume--that are making FFL so unpleasant. Attention troll was Barry's entirely apt term for Richard not very long ago. */ The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty clear-cut: /* */ /* Lies are frequently simpler and clearer-cut than the reality. They're designed to be. */ /* */ NO ONE but Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered by Richard turning the tables and doing to her what she's done to so many others for so many years. /* Whoopsie-daisy. We don't know how many are bothered by Richard's excessive posting, first of all. They may not be speaking up because they don't want to become one of his targets. More importantly, Richard isn't turning the tables; what he's doing is vastly unlike what I do: his attacks consist almost exclusively of falsehoods. If I criticize somebody, I do it honestly. And Barry knows this. */ NO ONE is rushing to her defense. /* */ /* *I don't need anyone to rush to my defense. I've never had any trouble handling attacks, especially ones that involve lies, as Barry knows to his sorrow. And Richard's attacks and lies are pretty pitiful.* */ /* */
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion
You are mistaken- Robin's post was not a parody; his post was true in all respects. Judy is the only person I know of that thinks Robin's post was a parody. If what Ann said was accurate, Robin wouldn't have time to post a parody to FFL - he has better things to do than parody Judy. The fact is, that Judy can't tell a parody from an opinion. But, Judy already knows this. And, apparently Judy can't tell a parody from posting a true statement. And why? She's obviously got an ego about a mile wide and growing by the hour. Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Go figure. Nothing Judy posts from now on will be taken seriously - I have now exposed her as a mere poser and she is very angry. Judy Stein is a loser, period. Finished. Wrap.her.up.and.toss.her.in.the.can. Stick a fork in her - she is done on this forum. On 12/26/2013 10:49 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *I did reply to that post, it was a parody--the whole exchange was a parody--and the host of monkeys that just flew out of your butt are throwing poo at you.* * * For the record, for those who may not remember: Robin didn't leave FFL until almost three weeks later, and he left because of a brutally cruel post from Curtis commenting on Robin's Open Letter about having struck his students. Richard knows all this. As he himself has admitted, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of embarrassment at her behavior. I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign the integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think. Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never ending dispute. When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but with a change of attitude. So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams masked zebra wrote: In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very recently been unable to accepteven tolerate. And this was of course because of his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide with the truth, with reality. Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence. So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and Raunchydog), his judgment of me and my posts is valid as well. Now I would just ask the readers of
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion
So, by your logic, if a Canadian posts a message, it's a parody; if two guys from Texas post messages, they are lies. Thanks for the clarification. You certainly must have all the inside information on this one. Good work! So, why can't the Canadian speak for himself? He didn't seem to have any trouble over-posting here in the past. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 10:52 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote: You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure. I have it right from the horse's mouth (Robin's) that this was a parody. Go figure. I even have it documented in a private email. Go figure some more. On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of embarrassment at her behavior. I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign the integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think. Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never ending dispute. When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but with a change of attitude. So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams masked zebra wrote: In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very recently been unable to accepteven tolerate. And this was of course because of his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide with the truth, with reality. Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence. So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and Raunchydog), his judgment of me and my posts is valid as well. Now I would just ask the readers of FFLthose who have aligned themselves with Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, with Jim and othersto reconsider their position, since for someone like myself to undergo a change of perception this significant, a change which I was determined would not and could not happen, suggests something very powerful at work here. You remember Saul persecuting the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to Damascus by Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a fierce defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as spectacular a transformation of belief, I think there are parallels here, and to the extent to which Saul became Paul, I have become a very different Robin. I don't say that Barry is Jesus or
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: for Emily Bob, to thank Richard, Share finally replies about Ann#39;s tree photo
You didn't answer my questions. I guess they must be pretty threatening to you. I support Richard because not only are his posts humorous and interesting and having good spiritual knowledge, but they are also kind, for the most part. He even says that you are probably nice in person. On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 4:03 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You support Richard, who has more fantasies about me and Ann and others than I can count. What's up with that, Share? Why don't you correct his fantasies too? And Barry's? Not to mention your own fantasies about us. Who's living in a fantasy world? Seems kinda inconsistent, don't you think? Like, hypocritical? Actually I live in a 2 BR, 1 1/2 bath townhouse with dining room and breakfast nook. The rest is also Ann's fantasy about me. On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 3:05 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: On 12/24/2013 10:51 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: Judy, there is a reason Share is living alone as an older woman in a one-bedroom flat in the middle of Iowa. And it's not because she chose this. You mean compared to an even older woman working out of a home office near a beach in New Jersey, and not because she chose this?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
When did I ever say otherwise? And, how would you know, since you don't even read my messages. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 10:53 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: *As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously.* What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and more people are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of operation. Even Barry is reading my messages these days. Now that's better! Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to Robin's recent post about you. You have been totally discredited and now we know who is the real stalker and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in almost every message you post these days. All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard. It's that simple. On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? */ /* */Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. /* It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk me, and of course to do it with lies. In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 160-something. Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week. And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with the rest of Barry's posts this morning. */ But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... /* */ /* *That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to deal with.* * * *And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks of him.* * *
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
Richard I think Xeno and merudanda are also good writers, in the category of writers of long and medium sized posts. I think I'm pretty good with the one or two liners. go figure! (-: On Thursday, December 26, 2013 12:44 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: Ann has some pretty deep-seated prejudices - I tried to advise her of this, but apparently she is under the Judy spell: combative and nasty and just plain old mean-spirited. She seemed pretty nice back when Robin was around - Iwonder if that had any effect on her writing style. It looks like we are down to just two writers on the forum, Barry and Richard. Judy, with some help from Ann, got rid of all the other good writers - Vaj, Curtis, and Robin. Bill has a lot of promise - he obviously knows a lot, but he is busy earning a living and that's a good thing. I'm sure he has better things to do than try to give any knowledge to Judy. Bill knocked her off as a poser a long time ago. On 12/26/2013 12:03 PM, Share Long wrote: With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie! On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 9:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote: Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a liar or he has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin its a parody of Judy - she can't seem to understand that she is the butt of everyone's joke and has been for years. If what Robin said was a parody, Judy seemed to miss it, since she failed to post a single comment about it after Robin left the group. What Judy doesn't realize is that she is the reason Robin left. Poor Ricky Retardo. The reason Robin left was because he had much more important things to do, things that would be far and away beyond your comprehension or your depth. I have this on the highest authority. Why not obsess on something else for a while? I know, why don't you and Sharon discuss what you talk about best - nothing. On 12/25/2013 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote: Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed with attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You attribute the worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the case. It is quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here in the past (I don't follow your links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie has to be deliberate. The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions expressed may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false accusations. There is no need to respond with links that prove what you are saying, because unlike you I have no interest in going back to the archives to check on something I may have said a long time ago. Who cares? Only you. The truth is that you are a malicious individual who has an obsessive need to brand people you do not like as liars. It is a very ugly trait, auth. Of course you are unable to see it for yourself, but again I ask you: Why do so many people on this forum despise you? Why are you always involved in arguments here in which everyone is a liar except you? The best thing you could do now would be to apologize for your insulting language toward me, but that would require a level of decency on your part that you have never before shown. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote: (Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something not-so-full of
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. Ann has some pretty deep-seated prejudices - I tried to advise her of this, but apparently she is under the Judy spell: combative and nasty and just plain old mean-spirited. She seemed pretty nice back when Robin was around - Iwonder if that had any effect on her writing style. It looks like we are down to just two writers on the forum, Barry and Richard. Judy, with some help from Ann, got rid of all the other good writers - Vaj, Curtis, and Robin. Bill has a lot of promise - he obviously knows a lot, but he is busy earning a living and that's a good thing. I'm sure he has better things to do than try to give any knowledge to Judy. Bill knocked her off as a poser a long time ago.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting snarky messages all day and into the night. She used to be the top poster, but now I've left her in the dust. A writer, Judy is NOT. On 12/26/2013 10:56 AM, Bhairitu wrote: The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity. It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. Maybe Barry was posting a parody. Judy is easily the target of a parody, as Robin demonstrated. Apparently Judy will fall for any parody, even one by Robin that looks like the truth. Go figure. Everyone knows that Judy was the top poster around here for years - she can't resist posting some snarky reply to just about every post submitted. But, when someone posts something on topic, she just ignores it. Why? Because she knows next to nothing about yoga or meditation, obviously, or even music for that matter. par·o·dy verb past tense: parodied; past participle: parodied 1. produce a humorously exaggerated imitation of (a writer, artist, or genre).
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. The only posts Richard were making were the ones stalking Ann and me You need to stop the lying, Ms Stein. For the record, Judy has been stalking me for over a decade. The proof is in the archives. I came over here long before Judy, to try to get away from her, but here she is, posting the same old snarky comments, except now she has a macro running in Microsoft Notepad. Go figure.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC
Richard, didn't Maharishi say once that everything is important but nothing is serious? On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:14 PM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com wrote: When did I ever say otherwise? And, how would you know, since you don't even read my messages. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 10:53 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and more people are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of operation. Even Barry is reading my messages these days. Now that's better! Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to Robin's recent post about you. You have been totally discredited and now we know who is the real stalker and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in almost every message you post these days. All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard. It's that simple. On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfriend@... wrote: RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk me, and of course to do it with lies. In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 160-something. Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week. And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with the rest of Barry's posts this morning. But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to deal with. And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks of him.
[FairfieldLife] please UNSUBSCRIBE me
no time for all the mail, folks, please unsubscribe me! Thanks! PS
[FairfieldLife] RE: Christmas Carols at Mass
You have just become one of the CEOs, meaning Christmas and Easter Only.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
More, um, wishful thinking from Barry. ;-) The most fascinating thing about it all, from a psychological point of view, is that Judy actually thinks she's winning. So does Ann. But then, both of them are so clueless that they climbed all over themselves to see who could kiss Robin's ass the most. Not exactly the brightest candles on the cake. Poor Barry was wildly, insanely jealous of Robin. Still is. Brings him up at every opportunity even long after he's left. I've never seen Barry so distraught by a single poster.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. You are mistaken- Robin's post was not a parody; his post was true in all respects. Judy is the only person I know of that thinks Robin's post was a parody. If what Ann said was accurate, Robin wouldn't have time to post a parody to FFL - he has better things to do than parody Judy. The fact is, that Judy can't tell a parody from an opinion. But, Judy already knows this. And, apparently Judy can't tell a parody from posting a true statement. And why? She's obviously got an ego about a mile wide and growing by the hour. Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Go figure. Nothing Judy posts from now on will be taken seriously - I have now exposed her as a mere poser and she is very angry. Judy Stein is a loser, period. Finished. Wrap.her.up.and.toss.her.in.the.can. Stick a fork in her - she is done on this forum. On 12/26/2013 10:49 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: I did reply to that post, it was a parody--the whole exchange was a parody--and the host of monkeys that just flew out of your butt are throwing poo at you. For the record, for those who may not remember: Robin didn't leave FFL until almost three weeks later, and he left because of a brutally cruel post from Curtis commenting on Robin's Open Letter about having struck his students. Richard knows all this. As he himself has admitted, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote: This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of embarrassment at her behavior. I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign the integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think. Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never ending dispute. When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but with a change of attitude. So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams masked zebra wrote: In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very recently been unable to accepteven tolerate. And this was of course because of his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide with the truth, with reality. Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence. So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his assessment of
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting snarky messages all day and into the night. She used to be the top poster, but now I've left her in the dust. A writer, Judy is NOT. On 12/26/2013 10:56 AM, Bhairitu wrote: The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity. It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@... mailto:j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion
Richard is in tune with Maharishi who said that everything is important but nothing is serious. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:27 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. You are mistaken- Robin's post was not a parody; his post was true in all respects. Judy is the only person I know of that thinks Robin's post was a parody. If what Ann said was accurate, Robin wouldn't have time to post a parody to FFL - he has better things to do than parody Judy. The fact is, that Judy can't tell a parody from an opinion. But, Judy already knows this. And, apparently Judy can't tell a parody from posting a true statement. And why? She's obviously got an ego about a mile wide and growing by the hour. Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Go figure. Nothing Judy posts from now on will be taken seriously - I have now exposed her as a mere poser and she is very angry. Judy Stein is a loser, period. Finished. Wrap.her.up.and.toss.her.in.the.can. Stick a fork in her - she is done on this forum. On 12/26/2013 10:49 AM, authfriend@... wrote: I did reply to that post, it was a parody--the whole exchange was a parody--and the host of monkeys that just flew out of your butt are throwing poo at you. For the record, for those who may not remember: Robin didn't leave FFL until almost three weeks later, and he left because of a brutally cruel post from Curtis commenting on Robin's Open Letter about having struck his students. Richard knows all this. As he himself has admitted, nothing he says is to be taken seriously. You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure. On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... wrote: This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of embarrassment at her behavior. I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign the integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think. Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never ending dispute. When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but with a change of attitude. So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams masked zebra wrote: In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and the characters I have interacted with. It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: for Emily Bob, to thank Richard, Share finally replies about Ann's tree photo
Judy, I answered one of your questions even though imo they're all pretty dumb. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:14 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: You didn't answer my questions. I guess they must be pretty threatening to you. I support Richard because not only are his posts humorous and interesting and having good spiritual knowledge, but they are also kind, for the most part. He even says that you are probably nice in person. On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 4:03 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You support Richard, who has more fantasies about me and Ann and others than I can count. What's up with that, Share? Why don't you correct his fantasies too? And Barry's? Not to mention your own fantasies about us. Who's living in a fantasy world? Seems kinda inconsistent, don't you think? Like, hypocritical? Actually I live in a 2 BR, 1 1/2 bath townhouse with dining room and breakfast nook. The rest is also Ann's fantasy about me. On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 3:05 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: On 12/24/2013 10:51 AM, awoelflebater@... wrote: Judy, there is a reason Share is living alone as an older woman in a one-bedroom flat in the middle of Iowa. And it's not because she chose this. You mean compared to an even older woman working out of a home office near a beach in New Jersey, and not because she chose this?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams wrote: It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting snarky messages all day and into the night. She used to be the top poster, but now I've left her in the dust. A writer, Judy is NOT. I'd certainly agree with the last sentence. What kind of real writer would settle for grading other people's papers as a career rather than try to write something -- anything -- herself? On 12/26/2013 10:56 AM, Bhairitu wrote: The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity. It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote: I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle. But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia. I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Greater than Jesus?
Yep, John, funny old world we're living in... On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:42 AM, jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com wrote: This guy claims to be the one. And some people believe him. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfgnNHJ2zQc
[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits
Oooopsie! Never claimed to be a writer. It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting snarky messages all day and into the night. She used to be the top poster, but now I've left her in the dust. A writer, Judy is NOT. I'd certainly agree with the last sentence. What kind of real writer would settle for grading other people's papers as a career rather than try to write something -- anything -- herself? On 12/26/2013 10:56 AM, Bhairitu wrote: The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity. It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote: I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: for Emily Bob, to thank Richard, Share finally replies about Ann#39;s tree photo
If you'll forgive me, Share, I hardly consider your opinion definitive on what is dumb and what is not. I understand why you have to avoid the tough questions, though. That's your modus operandi. You couldn't survive otherwise. Judy, I answered one of your questions even though imo they're all pretty dumb. On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:14 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You didn't answer my questions. I guess they must be pretty threatening to you. I support Richard because not only are his posts humorous and interesting and having good spiritual knowledge, but they are also kind, for the most part. He even says that you are probably nice in person. On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 4:03 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote: You support Richard, who has more fantasies about me and Ann and others than I can count. What's up with that, Share? Why don't you correct his fantasies too? And Barry's? Not to mention your own fantasies about us. Who's living in a fantasy world? Seems kinda inconsistent, don't you think? Like, hypocritical? Actually I live in a 2 BR, 1 1/2 bath townhouse with dining room and breakfast nook. The rest is also Ann's fantasy about me. On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 3:05 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... wrote: On 12/24/2013 10:51 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote: Judy, there is a reason Share is living alone as an older woman in a one-bedroom flat in the middle of Iowa. And it's not because she chose this. You mean compared to an even older woman working out of a home office near a beach in New Jersey, and not because she chose this?
[FairfieldLife] RE: please UNSUBSCRIBE me
Kind of a shame you don't have the time to read even one of those emails to see the directions for unsubscribing that are found on each and every one of them. Because thanks to the glory that is the Neo interface, I get an error when I try to unsubscribe you. So, you're SOL until you can figure it out yourself. You're welcome, Alex, the ever so slightly grumpy moderator who woke up at 4am to a very bad dream ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peter.stjo...@yahoo.com wrote: no time for all the mail, folks, please unsubscribe me! Thanks! PS