[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC

2013-12-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  some newbie asked:

 RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean?

Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were
created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this a
week.

But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the
Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that
they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers...





[FairfieldLife] Re: Go for a calm, relaxing, four-minute cross-country ski break

2013-12-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Methinks it could be short lived if we get around to playing it again.
I did better than I expected this first day of skiing.  But quite
exhausted.  Gonna see if I can get through these remaining posts before
nodding off.

I have the same problem, and I wasn't even skiing.  :-)





[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread TurquoiseB
Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on everything
said about posting limits back during the period when they were being
debated as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop making 100-150
posts per week and STFU:

 If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently--
 and *nastily*--complaining about the top posters
 here if they were critical of TM and supportive of
 Barry, rather than supportive of TM and critical
 of Barry, I have a nice bridge you might want to
 have a look at.  - Judy Stein, Nov 3, 2006

In other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with her, when
she was making that many to stalk other people, as she's done
consistently for almost 20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns the
table on her and the other Mean Girls, suddenly *she's* the one trying
to sell the posting limits bridge to other people.

Can you say Karma, dude?  I think you can.  :-)

Here she is proposing the *exact same strategy* currently being used
against her so effectively by Richard (bold emphasis mine):

 I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but it's awfully
 convenient for Barry that the three top posters
 just happen to be among his chief critics here--
 so he can try to intimidate us into silence under
 cover of complaining about how much we post.
 It would be fun to see what he'd do if we
 were to limit our posts to criticisms of him.
- Judy Stein, Nov 2, 2006

Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he has *plenty* to say,
about many topics, pretty much all of them more interesting than Judy
Stein. All he had to do was up his quotient of posts criticizing Judy
and she goes batshit crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the people
screaming for posting limits again.

The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty clear-cut: NO ONE but
Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered by Richard turning
the tables and doing to her what she's done to so many others for so
many years.  NO ONE is rushing to her defense. Instead, pretty much
everyone is kinda *enjoying* seeing her get a taste of her own medicine.

Richard has, in fact, given the rest of us who've had to live with this
woman's insanity for so long a kind of Christmas present, letting us see
her demonstrate how badly she handles someone doing to her what she does
to others. I therefore nominate Richard as FFL Santa of the Year.  :-)










--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.

  However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being
reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's
too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus
which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As
long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if
it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly
regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle.

  But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of
mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the
onset of dementia.

  I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because
I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of
posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it
out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if
not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL
will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky.
He's just not worth it.




[FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread j_alexander_stanley
I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just 
fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline 
and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn 
well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people.

 

---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

 I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.
 

 However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex 
is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read 
the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made 
managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs 
itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating 
posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle.
 

 But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental 
problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia.
 

 
 I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing 
it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At 
least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we 
say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to 
drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice 
if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it. 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Go for a calm, relaxing, four-minute cross-country ski break

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
thanks, turq, my first LOL of the day. And yes, I'm sure my posts rank high in 
your nodding off category. Go figure!





On Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:30 AM, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Methinks it could be short lived if we get around to playing it again.  I did 
 better than I expected this first day of skiing.  But quite exhausted.  Gonna 
 see if I can get through these remaining posts before nodding off.

I have the same problem, and I wasn't even skiing.  :-)





[FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread dhamiltony2k5
 I am just a humble meditator.  I could help moderate this.  I have shoveled a 
lot of shit in my lifetime.  I am going to go out right now by dawn's early 
light before going to the morning Dome meditation to shovel some shit.  I feel 
that by by life's fullest and long experience that I could be pretty good at 
moderating this list.  My friends all call me Judicious by nickname.   I 
could be quite fair enforcing a posting limit here for the good of the group.  
Let me have the password to FFL and I'll do it. 
 I feel like I could serve the group well in moderation.  I volunteer.
 Jai Brahmananda Saraswati,  
 -Buck of the Dome 


[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or
lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they
should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do
simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people.

I completely understand, and please remember that *I* am not the person
asking for posting limits again. Hilariously, it's the person who *they
were invented for* asking for them.

That said, I *can* think of a more low maintenance version of the
Posting Limit, should anyone want to take over your function. This
version only requires the moderator to look at one Post Count post per
week, the one that comes out after Friday night and that contains the
weekly totals.

If anyone on it has gone over 75 posts, the moderator just blocks their
address and bans them from posting, FOREVER.

I already know who the first three people to go would be, and Richard
wouldn't be one of them.  :-)


 ---In FairfieldLife@{{evilDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:

  I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.

  However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being
reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's
too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus
which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As
long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if
it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly
regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle.

  But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of
mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the
onset of dementia.

   I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because
I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of
posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it
out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if
not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL
will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky.
He's just not worth it.




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
Brings up an interesting question: why don't Judy and Ann filter out Richard? 
And me and turq and feste and whoever else is on their unacceptable list. And 
if they don't want to delete those posts, it's simple enough to create a Maybe 
Read Later folder. I now have over 50 posts in my Maybe Read Later folder!





On Thursday, December 26, 2013 5:49 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com 
j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to just 
fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go offline 
and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can damn 
well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people.



---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.

However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex is 
very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read the 
posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made 
managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs 
itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating 
posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle.

But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental 
problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia.



I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing 
it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At 
least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we 
say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to 
drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice 
if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it. 


Re: [FairfieldLife] History of Christmas

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
Very cool, John. I've also thought that the Divine Feminine can be thought of 
as the universal horizontal and the Divine Masculine as the universal vertical. 
In this sense Jesus can be seen to embody both.





On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 11:10 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com 
wrote:
 
  
Share,

The acharya's observation is similar to Santos Bonacci's point about Leonardo 
Da Vinci's. The Last Supper painting.  In his video, Bonacci said that the 
painting represents the variious zodiac signs and the four seasons.  The 
position of Jesus in the middle of the table represents the cross or the 
intersection between the equinoxial and solticial lines.  Thus his presence 
means that his teachings will last for all time here on earth or figuratively 
for the entire universe.


[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

 Brings up an interesting question: why don't Judy and Ann filter out
Richard? And me and turq and feste and whoever else is on their
unacceptable list.

Especially if, *as they claim*, neither they nor anyone else here takes
what any of us says seriously.

Seems to me they take it VERY seriously indeed. *They*, ironically, are
the only ones now lobbying for posting limits to cut down the number of
things said about them. Talk about Egos In A Panic.  :-)

The irony of it all is just too delicious. The very person the FFL
Posting Limits were invented FOR is now crying like a baby and calling
for them again, to keep someone from doing to her what *she* was doing
to many others back when they first invented the Posting Limits to get
*her* to lighten up.

Thanks again for the Christmas present, Richard.  :-)









[FairfieldLife] RE: FairfieldLife-supporting

2013-12-26 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Om, This lecture is even better the 2nd time listening through once you got 
where the geography of the lecture goes. -Buck

Veda and Greece
http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 
http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 
 

Buck wrote:

 Deep and spiritual marination everywhere. In Fairfield, Iowa this kind of 
extremely elevated thing like this lecture is the kind thing that gets talked 
about in all the shops, places and cafes and the kind of thing that we have 
playing on our radios. Deep and spiritual marination everywhere.   It is in the 
air-waves.   It is even on the car radio when you drive around Fairfield, Iowa 
commuting or just out on errands.   It is in the Walkman or on the ipod when 
folks are out walking or biking or doing work, ditch digging  or out with doing 
farm chores.   I'd seriously recommend it for everyone: 
http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 
http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 

For good listening outside  like even when Buck is not in the Dome,
-Buck http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 
http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 

Buck wrote:

 Most you people lurking here and a lot posting here on FFL  I git the 
impression don't live anywhere close to Fairfield, Iowa and it seems a number 
of you don't even meditate.   There is a fabulous lecture on  the Greeks and 
the Veda you can listen to vicariously to give you some feeling as to what we 
are doing here as a meditating community. It is a good lecture that connects 
and does unifies in context a lot of what is going on here really. Anybody on 
Fairfieldlife really ought to listen to this lecture to really be able to 
participate with much of anything to say on Fairfieldlife. It would improve the 
group a lot if we were all on one page at least about certain things and not 
just dumping any ignorant stuff here on this forum.

I should recommend you all listen  to this distinguished lecture  for the good 
of the community here.   Listen to it clear through.   It is an mp3 and would 
be good for you and the group here: 
http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 
http://www.khoe.org/mp3s/kenchandler10_19_13.mp3 

-Buck in the Dome
 Take the time.  
 [Sorry for the formatting, Yahoo-Neo is the shits.]   






[FairfieldLife] Meditation: It's Not What You Think

2013-12-26 Thread Richard Williams
You can define meditation as a type of prayer. According to MMY, meditation
is like prayer, except on a very subtle level.

In a recent visit to Sonoma in California it seemed like almost the entire
northern half of California meditates using various breath awareness
techniques or various yoga techniques. I know that in northern California
lots of people practice Zen meditation. Recently I sat with Jokusho Kwong,
the roshi of the Sonoma Zen Center, when I visited my daughter in Santa
Rosa. I've known the roshi since the days when I sat with Suzuki at the San
Francisco Zen Center.

[image: Inline image 1]
Everyday Zen at Sonoma Zen Center

According to the dictionary, meditation means simply 'to think things
over'. If so, then everyone meditates. There's probably not a person on the
planet who doesn't pause once or twice a day to take stock of their mind
contents. And we're all transcending - even without a specific technique.
So, the question is: do you enjoy?

As a method of stress reduction, meditation is often used in hospitals in
cases of chronic or terminal illness to reduce complications associated
with increased stress including a depressed immune system. There is growing
agreement in the medical community that mental factors such as stress
significantly contribute to a lack of physical health, and there is a
growing movement in mainstream science to fund research in this area.

Dr. Herbert Benson of the Mind-Body Medical Institute, which is affiliated
with Harvard and several Boston hospitals, reports that meditation induces
a host of biochemical and physical changes in the body collectively
referred to as the 'relaxation response.' The relaxation response includes
changes in metabolism, heart rate, respiration, blood pressure and brain
chemistry. Benson and his team have also done clinical studies at Buddhist
monasteries in the Himalayan Mountains.

Transcendental means to go beyond; meditation means thinking. Hence,
'Transcendental Meditation' means to go beyond thinking. - Charlie Lutes

Works cited:

Charles F. Lutes
http://www.maharishiphotos.com/tmintro.html

Sonoma Mountain Zen Center:
http://www.smzc.net/

Meditation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditation

Other References:

'The Mystery of Consciousness'
By Steven Pinker
Time Magazine, Friday, Jan. 19, 2007
http://tinyurl.com/3ck5qe

'The Science of Meditation'
Time Magazine Cover Story, August 4, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/63xac5

'Just say Om'
by Joel Stein
Time Magazine, Sunday, Jul. 27, 2003
http://tinyurl.com/icu6


[FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion

2013-12-26 Thread punditster
This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the 
discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the 
some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of 
mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like 
to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking 
your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - 
it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of 
embarrassment at her behavior.

I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get 
Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do 
some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on 
this whole mean campaign to malign  the integrity of Richard and Barry and 
Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. 
That's what I think.

Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and 
Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with 
you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter 
and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never 
ending dispute. 

When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time to 
revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but 
with a change of attitude.

So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, 
the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms 
Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for 
myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the 
full moon.- Richard Williams

 masked zebra wrote:

 In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and 
the characters I have interacted with.
 
 It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and 
without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry 
appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded 
that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about 
even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very 
recently been unable to accept—even tolerate. And this was of course because of 
his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, 
these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was 
right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to 
consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism 
of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to 
have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide 
with the truth, with reality.
 
 Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence.
 
 So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this 
anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his 
assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and Raunchydog), his judgment 
of me and my posts is valid as well.
 
 Now I would just ask the readers of FFL—those who have aligned themselves with 
Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, with Jim and others—to 
reconsider their position, since for someone like myself to undergo a change of 
perception this significant, a change which I was determined would not and 
could not happen, suggests something very powerful at work here. You remember 
Saul persecuting the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to 
Damascus by Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a fierce 
defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as spectacular a 
transformation of belief, I think there are parallels here, and to the extent 
to which Saul became Paul, I have become a very different Robin. I don't say 
that Barry is Jesus or anything like that. That would be absurd. And even if I 
did think that Barry was Christ, I know he would only have contempt for such a 
view of him. So, no, I won't go that far. But I will say that in the main Barry 
has been right all along, and even his most vitriolic and bitter posts have 
been in the service of somehow forcing people to see what they, like me, were 
blind to.
 
 Well, I have been persuaded, and in a way which really means something, that 
Barry is the martyr here, and I can't tell you (although Steve perhaps has 
somewhat had the foretaste of such a sensation—but only very mildly) how much 
better I feel, not just in my heart, but in my conscience. I am not going to 
congratulate myself on what I have accomplished here in mortifying my pride and 
my sense of righteousness to bend the knee and reverse course in my judgment of 
this person, but I do think that 

[FairfieldLife] The Art of Multi-Dimensional Living

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
A message from Edward Tarabilda:

Despite these drawbacks in his recent teaching and his failure to fully 
honor The Art of Multi-Dimensional Living®, by promoting only one 
generic form of meditation, Maharishi still deserves our praise and 
thanks. No one has done more to enhance human evolution in the twentieth 
century than Maharishi. He has been a virtual dynamo from the moment he 
came out of the Himalayas, and has offered a seemingly never ending 
series of innovative programs to help mankind solve its pressing 
problems. I, myself, have gained much from Maharishi and hold him in 
high esteem, even though I am also, at times, his harshest critic.

One of my criticisms has been Maharishi's tendency to promote a 
dangerous form of elitism among his followers. There is a difference 
between one-pointed attention to the task at hand and an elitism which 
tends to dismiss the contributions of others as insignificant. The 
streak of eastern fundamentalism which is so predominant in Swami 
Brahmananda Saraswati's other disciple, Swami Prakashananda, also exists 
in Maharishi's teaching and organization, although to a lesser degree. 
These authoritarian tendencies exist in most eastern teachings and are 
one of the reasons why they are no longer the most suitable for modern 
western people. However, none of what I have just said should keep us 
from admiring the accomplishments of these group, nor from supporting 
them where appropriate.

In Maharishi's defense, we must realize that the urgency of his task 
(helping prevent the world from self-destructing) required unusual 
methods and sacrifices, which sometimes appear to ignore or violate the 
principles of The Art of Multi-Dimensional Living® He has always 
suggested that a time would come when the spiritual needs of each 
individual would become a rightly restored priority. It is apparent that 
in saying this, he was referring to the advent of The Art of 
Multi-Dimensional Living.

The only way you will know if a teacher is enlightened, is if he is 
able to enlighten you! - Edward Tarabilda

A Note on Edward Tarabilda:

The late Edward F. Tarabilda's was a spiritual teacher in the tradition 
of knowledge known as Gyana Yoga. The Art of Multi-Dimensional Living is 
a profound elaboration of this path which grew out of his inner 
cognitions. Edward was a colleague of Dr Vasant Lad and Dr David 
Frawley. Edward Tarabilda, of Fairfield, IA, was an early adopter of TM, 
author and critic, philosopher, spiritual guide, ex- M.U.M faculty, 
ex-M.U.M. Vice-President, passed away on January 10th, 1999 at 
Fairfield, IA while playing tennis at MUM.

Read more:

'Ayurveda Revolutionized: Integrating'
by Edward Tarabilda
Lotus Press, 1997

'The Art of Multi-dimensional Living'
by Edward Tarabilda
http://shell.forethought.net/~risaacs/ 
http://shell.forethought.net/%7Erisaacs/


[FairfieldLife] Re: Classical Masterpieces

2013-12-26 Thread Richard Williams
Richard Wagner

[image: Inline image 1]

Rienzi Overture (Full) - The Symphony Orchestra of the LISZT School of
Music, Weimar
http://youtu.be/URIwWtwn6qA

Wilhelm Richard Wagner was a German composer, theater director,
polemicist, and conductor who is primarily known for his operas. Wagner
revolutionized opera through his concept of the Gesamtkunstwerk (total
work of art), by which he sought to synthesis the poetic, visual, musical
and dramatic arts, with music subsidiary to drama, and which was announced
in a series of essays between 1849 and 1852. Wagner realized these ideas
most fully in the first half of the four-opera cycle Der Ring des
Nibelungen (The Ring of the Nibelung).

Read more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Wagner

A note on Wagner:

Apparently Wagner wore pink underwear, climbed trees, and liked to stand on
his head. To match his pink pink underwear he often wore satin breeches, a
pink eiderdown-padded house robe and pink slippers with the rose bouquets.
In spite of this, some people think he wrote some nice music. Go figure.

As a young college student I listened to several of his operas (works) in
two courses of music appreciation. I attended this course twice so that I
could get the perspective from two different professors of music. We would
sit here for hours listening to the arias,which were translated,probably
because nobody in the class could understand all those complicated German
words.

You can always tell a genuine Wagner opera because they last for hours on
end when performed on the stage. One critic at the time wrote about a
Wagner opera:

Of all the clumsy,lumbering, boggling, baboon-blooded stuff I ever saw on
a human stage; of all the affected, sapless, soul-less, beginingless,
endless, topless, bottomless, topsy-turviest doggerel of sound I ever
endured the deadliness of,that eternity of nothing was the deadliest.

Work cited:

'Lives of the Musical Greats'
by Victor Borge
Doubleday-Tarcher, 1971
p. 119



On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 Igor Stravinsky

 [image: Inline image 2]

 The Firebird - Gergiev · Vienna Philarmonic
 http://youtu.be/RZkIAVGlfWk

 Petrushka - Boston Symphony Orchestra
 http://youtu.be/ZZIEKCN-rIU

 The Rite of Spring (Le Sacre du printemps) - Leonard Bernstein
 http://youtu.be/5Kyso5VmZ6g

 Igor Stravinsky is considered to be one of the most important and
 influential composers of the 20th century. Stravinsky's compositional
 career was notable for its stylistic diversity. He first achieved
 international fame with three ballets commissioned by the impresario Sergei
 Diaghilev and first performed in Paris by Diaghilev's Ballets Russes: The
 Firebird (1910), Petrushka (1911) and The Rite of Spring (1913). Stravinsky
 was named by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people of the
 century.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igor_Stravinsky


 On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Richard Williams 
 pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 [image: Inline image 1]

 Aram Khachaturian - Sabre Dance, Seiji Ozawa
 http://youtu.be/ejIk_Za-q4Y

 Sabre Dance is a movement in the final act of the ballet Gayane (1942)
 by Aram Khachaturian. It is considered Khachaturian's most famous work. It
 is based on Armenian folk music, especially its middle section.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabre_Dance

 [image: Inline image 2]

 Aram Khachaturian was a Soviet Armenian composer. Alongside Sergei
 Prokofiev and Dmitri Shostakovich, Khachaturian is sometimes called one of
 the three 'titans' of Soviet music. He is also considered 'one of the major
 musicians' of the 20th century.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aram_Khachaturian


 On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Richard Williams 
 pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 [image: Inline image 3]

 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - Piano Concerto No. 21 in C Andante (2nd
 Movement) - Daniel Barenboim
 http://youtu.be/DRCEwy5XQSs

 The second movement was featured in the 1967 Swedish film Elvira
 Madigan.

 Elvira Madigan is a 1967 Swedish film directed by Bo Widerberg, based
 on the tragedy of the Danish tightrope dancer Hedvig Jensen (born 1867),
 working under the stage name of Elvira Madigan at her stepfather's
 travelling circus, who runs away with the deserter Swedish lieutenant
 Sixten Sparre (born 1854)

 [image: Inline image 4]

 Elvira Madigan:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvira_Madiganhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvira_Madigan_%28film%29

 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was a prolific and influential composer of the
 Classical era. Mozart showed prodigious ability from his earliest
 childhood. Already competent on keyboard and violin, he composed from the
 age of five and performed before European royalty.

 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart:
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Amadeus_Mozart


 On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Richard Williams 
 pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 [image: Inline image 1]

 Beethoven Symphony No. 9, 'Choral' - Daniel Barenboim, Royal Albert
 Hall, 27 July 2012
 

[FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread doctordumbass
Hooray!!! I am always in favor of self-sufficiency, especially when it comes to 
something as extraneous and just for fun, as a web forum. Even if I post 10,000 
posts next week, no will miss a meal or lose a loved one. This issue in terms 
of stuff that matters, falls way down near the bottom of my list. 
As for Richard's postings, they all look the same to me - nothing 
differentiates one from another, so, no offense, please, but I don't think I 
have read one in months.
Regarding the continual efforts of Judy to prove Barry wrong, and his ongoing 
efforts to prove her wrong, that has become a hallmark around here - The 
Squabbling Seniors, I call it. Kinda fun, when I am in the mood to watch.

Btw, I wrapped all the Christmas presents I gave this year in *meat-themed* 
wrapping paper - one looked like ground beef, or symmetrical corn dogs, or cuts 
of meat. Purchased from the Archie McPhee website.

Note to Ann - also bought something called Emergency Horse, which is a small 
plastic device with a speaker on it, and four buttons that each reproduce the 
sound of a horse; neigh, snort, gallop and whinny. Well worth the $4.95.

http://mcphee.com/shop/meat-parade-wrapping-paper-book.html 
http://mcphee.com/shop/meat-parade-wrapping-paper-book.html

[FairfieldLife] Adventures in Mind Science

2013-12-26 Thread Richard Williams
The research referred to was co-funded by Mind Science Foundation and
featured in September of 2006 in the premier scientific publication in the
United States, Science, as well as the Wall Street Journal and CNN.

I regard the creation of the Mind Science Foundation as the most important
undertaking of my life … The human mind has tremendous unexplored potential
and I want to go about the discovery and development of that potential in a
scientific way. - Tom Slick

Thomas Baker Tom Slick, Jr. (May 6, 1916 – October 6, 1962) was a San
Antonio, Texas based inventor, businessman, adventurer, and heir to an oil
business. Slick's father, Thomas Baker Slick, Sr., a.k.a. The King of the
Wildcatters, had made a fortune during the Texas oil boom of the 1920s.
During the 1950s, Slick was an adventurer. He turned his attention to
expeditions to investigate the Loch Ness Monster, the Yeti, Bigfoot and the
Trinity Alps giant salamander.

[image: Inline image 1]

The O’Neil Ford-designed Tom Slick house on Devine Road, San Antonio, Texas

Slick founded several research organizations, beginning with the forerunner
of the Texas Biomedical Research Institute in 1941. His most well-known
legacy is the non-profit Southwest Research Institute (SwRI), which he
founded in 1947 to seek revolutionary advancements in technology. SwRI
continues to advance pure and applied science in a variety of fields from
lubricant and motor fuel formulation to solar physics and planetary
science. He also founded the Mind Science Foundation in San Antonio in 1958
to do consciousness research.

Tom Slick: Visionary philanthropist and entrepreneur.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Slick

Tom Slick Foundations:

Mind Science Foundation
117 West El Prado Drive
San Antonio, Texas 78212
http://www.mindscience.org/index.cfm

Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research
7620 NW Loop 410
San Antonio, Texas
http://www.sfbr.org/

Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas
http://www.swri.org/

Titles of interest:

'The Mystery of Consciousness'
By  Steven Pinker
Time Magazine Special Issue, Friday, Jan. 19, 2007
http://tinyurl.com/3ck5qe

This is a great dedication to a man unafraid to seek out those mysterious
creatures which may or may not exist. This book should also serve as a
bittersweet and stark reminder of how much progress crypto-researchers have
made since Slick's time.

'Tom Slick and the Search for Yeti'
by Loren Coleman
Faber  Faber, 1989

The ending of the book and the stories of involvement with the CIA gave
great food for thought and I won't spoil anyone's enjoyment of the book by
going into more detail.

'Tom Slick'
True Life Encounters in Cryptozoology
by Loren Coleman
Linden Publishing, 2002

...as Slick’s niece, she had rare access to family members for interviews,
letters, papers and photo collections. She is a Fellow of the Explorers
Club, based in New York, and like her uncle, has journeyed to remote
corners of the world. When not investigating new mysteries, she lives in
San Antonio, Texas.

'Tom Slick Mystery Hunter'
by Catherine Nixon Cooke
Paraview, 2005


[FairfieldLife] Re: Information Technology Systems

2013-12-26 Thread Richard Williams
Arrest him and book him!

You are fired for lying to the American people. Clear out your desk and
leave the building! Officer, arrest this man and book him for serial lying.
Bailiff, put this man in chains and take him for the perp walk,immediately!
Mr. Biden, get on the phone with that Snowden fellow and get his pardon
ready,NOW! Do it!

It's not easy to pick the year's most transparent lie from the self-styled
“most transparent administration in history.” There are so many to choose
from—such a richness of embarrassment.

For my money, the biggest presidential lie of the year came on June 7, the
week after former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden
revealed the agency's secret collection of call records data on millions of
Americans. “I welcome this debate,” Obama proclaimed—even as his
administration was hunting down the whistleblower who started it and
preparing to hit him with 30 years of Espionage Act charges.

Read more:

'Obama's Epic Fib About the NSA'
http://reason.com/archives/2013/12/24/obamas-epic-fibs-about-the-nsa


On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 The ObamaCare disaster is not just a management failure, it's a firing
 incident. Where I used to work, a system failure this large would be a
 cause for instant dismissal:

 *Clean off your desk and get out, you're fired! Officer, escort this
 person off the premises. And, don't you ever come back! You'll never work
 in this town again. You fuckin' idiot!*

 [image: Inline image 1]

 'In Defense of Kathleen Sebelius'
 http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303680404579141473117316190



Re: [FairfieldLife] Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
Remember, folks, according to Judy herself, Robin was posting a parody. 
What is the difference between lying and posting a parody? What Robin 
posted was a put-on that everybody took seriously, but when Richard 
posts a put-on, it's lying, according The Judge. Go figure.


On 12/25/2013 11:02 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*Remember, folks, according to Richard himself, 99 percent of what he 
posts is a put-on that nobody should take seriously.*


*
*

*Hmm, I think I'll make a macro of the above.*


I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't
because I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the
reinstatement of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just
might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive
troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to
drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it
would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it. 

Run to Rick, run to Rick. If Rick doesn't like me posting then he
can speak for himself and I can always post to Google Groups as
much as I want to, any time I want to, as long as I want to - it's
totally un-moderated.

Just for the record, Judy was one of the main reasons for the
posting limits in the first place. It's on record that she has
been the top poster for years on FFL and previously on Google
Groups. For some reason, she thinks she is the moderator of this
list now. Not for nothing do they call her The Corrector. Because
of her outright meanness, it's now open season on Ms Stein and now
I got the people-power to stand up to her. So, put that in your
pipe and smoke it.

I WILL NOT BOW AND SCRAPE TO THE TYRANT!

And also for the record, you and Judy are the main reasons this
group has gone into the basement. I don't see anyone else here
posting as much snark as you two post. Almost 50% of the posts
here are just ankle-biting and snark from you two gals. It's just
embarrassing. This is supposed to be an open discussion. In a
social gathering, you two gals would be asked to leave for being
just outright uncouth and mean-spirited.







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
Creating a phoney macro in NEO is much more than just phoney - it's 
the sure sign of a poser, desperately seeking attention. Nothing that Ms 
Stein posts here is to be taken seriously. NOTHING. Even her macro is 
a pose! Every nerd on the planet knows you can't create a macro in 
Microsoft Notepad. Go figure.


On 12/25/2013 11:03 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


Richard shoots himself in both feet:


The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating 
a phoney macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! 
Nothing I post is to be taken seriously



Yup, that'll be my new macro.







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
Thanks for the link,but why in the world would I need a macro to post 
a reply to you, or to anyone else? Like Barry, I can already key in text 
at a very high rate of speed - I've been playing Letter Invaders for 
twenty years. I will admit using this Toshiba Ultrabook with the 
chicklet keys slows me down some, but on a Rosewill keyboard, the one 
with the mechanical clicking sound, I can hit 99 WPM with one hand tied 
behind my back.


Macros are for newbies and nerds who can't type. You'd think that after 
working as a professional editor out of a home office for close to 
thirty years, Judy would have learned one simple fact: the querty 
keyboard does not change - all you have to do is memorize the keyboard 
layout. It's not complicated.


On 12/25/2013 11:22 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


BTW, Richard, if you'd like to start using macros for all your 
repetitive text, here's the macro program I've been using:



http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro


It's free for the first 30 days, then it costs $30 to register it. 
Installs very easily in Windows, ridiculously simple to use, at least 
for automating text strings. I haven't tried any of its bells and 
whistles for doing fancier stuff, but maybe you'll find them helpful too.





Richard shoots himself in both feet:


The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating 
a phoney macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! 
Nothing I post is to be taken seriously



Yup, that'll be my new macro.







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 12/26/2013 6:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
*/If anyone on it has gone over 75 posts, the moderator just blocks 
their address and bans them from posting, FOREVER. /*
Apparently you failed to realize that anyone can post here even if they 
are banned, just by altering their alias. But, thanks for your support. 
It looks like you've taken the filter off my posting to the group. Stay 
tuned for more fun in the Funny Farm Lounge - I'm just getting warmed 
up. I have at least 5,000 more on-topic messages from my self-published 
online book. Not to mention, I've just scratched the surface on my music 
series.


[FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
I'm not sure how you filter out a particular person's posts when you're 
reading on the Web site. If you're picking and choosing only a few posts to 
read of the traffic generally, as Barry claims he does, then working from 
Message View is the way to go. But if you're going from post to post via the 
Next button and want to read all but one person's posts, that doesn't work, 
obviously.
 

 In any case, as I go through the posts, I've always skipped quickly past 
Richard's. These days I do have to scan them briefly since he's into telling 
lies about me, and not all of them are instantly discernible as such by others. 
I need to know which of his trolls to shut down.
 

 But thankfully, he's now cooked his own goose by admitting what I've always 
pointed out about him: Nothing he says is to be taken seriously. So I don't 
need to do much more than use a macro citing that admission as a response to 
all the lies.
 

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
In the case of Judy, she's probably busy creating macros. But, 
seriously, if she isn't using Mozilla Thunderbird, she probably doesn't 
even know ho to set a filter in Yahoo Mail, even if she wanted to. It 
looks like she can't even figure out NEO and Yahoo Mail. Go figure.


But for someone with an obsession like Judy, she probably can't afford 
to miss anything someone might say about her. She read every single post 
here in real time by probably monitoring the group messages even while 
she is editing for her clients. I wouldn't be surprised if her cell 
phone is set to sound an alarm when she gets email, even in the middle 
of the night. Have you noted her message response times? LoL!


On 12/26/2013 6:27 AM, Share Long wrote:
Brings up an interesting question: why don't Judy and Ann filter out 
Richard? And me and turq and feste and whoever else is on their 
unacceptable list. And if they don't want to delete those posts, it's 
simple enough to create a Maybe Read Later folder. I now have over 50 
posts in my Maybe Read Later folder!




On Thursday, December 26, 2013 5:49 AM, 
j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com wrote:
I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or 
lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then 
they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to 
do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, 
people.



---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.

However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being 
reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and 
Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue 
moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly 
impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't 
matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting 
privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle.


But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of 
mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the 
onset of dementia.



I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm 
writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of 
posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick 
it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is 
nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the 
basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't 
because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.








Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting LimitsLET BUCK MODERATE

2013-12-26 Thread WLeed3


 
In a message dated 12/26/2013 7:17:06 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
dhamiltony...@yahoo.com writes:



I am just a humble meditator.  I could help moderate this.  I have shoveled 
a lot of shit  in my lifetime.  I am going to go out right now by dawn's 
early light  before going to the morning Dome meditation to shovel some shit.  
I feel  that by by life's fullest and long experience that I could be 
pretty good at  moderating this list.  My friends all call me Judicious by 
nickname.  I could be quite fair enforcing a posting limit here for the good of 
 
the group.  Let me have the password to FFL and I'll do it.  
I  feel like I could serve the group well in moderation.  I volunteer. 
Jai  Brahmananda Saraswati,   
-Buck  of the Dome





Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting LimitsLET BUCK Moderate

2013-12-26 Thread WLeed3


 
In a message dated 12/26/2013 6:49:13 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com writes:



I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to  
just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go  
offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you 
can  damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people.


---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}},  authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


I have to agree, except I'd rather make it  a 75-post limit. 

However, I don't think there's any chance of the  limit being reimposed. 
Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and  Rick's too busy to even 
read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus  which, apparently Neo 
has ma de managing a group nearly impossible. As long as  the group pretty 
much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves  removing and then 
reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis,  it's likely to 
be a huge hassle. 

But something really does have to be done about  Richard. Either he's 
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed  some kind of mental 
problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe  the onset of 
dementia. 


I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and  I haven't because I'm 
writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the  reinstatement of posting 
limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able  to stick it out with the, 
shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is  nothing if not persistent in 
his need to drive this forum into the basement.  FFL will end some day but 
it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's  just not worth it. 









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting LimitsLet Buck moderate

2013-12-26 Thread WLeed3


 
In a message dated 12/26/2013 6:40:17 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
turquoi...@yahoo.com writes:



Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on  everything 
said about posting limits back during the period when they were  being debated 
as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop making 100-150  posts per 
week and STFU:

 If anybody thinks Barry  would be so insistently--
 and *nastily*--complaining about the top  posters
 here if they were critical of TM and supportive of
  Barry, rather than supportive of TM and critical
 of Barry, I have a  nice bridge you might want to
 have a look at.  - Judy Stein,  Nov 3, 2006

In other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with her,  when she 
was making that many to stalk other people, as she's done  consistently for 
almost 20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns the table on  her and the 
other Mean Girls, suddenly *she's* the one trying to sell the  posting limits 
bridge to other people. 

Can you say Karma,  dude?  I think you can.  :-)

Here she is proposing the  *exact same strategy* currently being used 
against her so effectively by  Richard (bold emphasis mine):

 I'm sure it's just a  coincidence, but it's awfully
 convenient for Barry that the three top  posters
 just happen to be among his chief critics here--
 so he  can try to intimidate us into silence under
 cover of complaining about  how much we post. 
 It would be fun to see what he'd do if we  
 were to limit our posts to criticisms of him. 
- Judy Stein,  Nov 2, 2006

Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he has *plenty*  to say, 
about many topics, pretty much all of them more interesting than Judy  Stein. 
All he had to do was up his quotient of posts criticizing Judy and she  goes 
batshit crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the people screaming for  
posting limits again.

The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty  clear-cut: NO ONE but 
Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered by  Richard turning the 
tables and doing to her what she's done to so many others  for so many years.  
NO ONE is rushing to her defense. Instead, pretty  much everyone is kinda 
*enjoying* seeing her get a taste of her own medicine.  

Richard has, in fact, given the rest of us who've had to live with  this 
woman's insanity for so long a kind of Christmas present, letting us see  her 
demonstrate how badly she handles someone doing to her what she does to  
others. I therefore n ominate Richard as FFL Santa of the Year.   :-)










--- In  FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:

 I have to agree, except  I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. 
 
 However, I don't think  there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. 
Alex is very unlikely to want  to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to 
even read the posts here except  once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently 
Neo has made managing a group  nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty 
much runs itself, that doesn't  matter, but if it involves removing and 
then reinstating posting privileges on  a fairly regular basis, it's likely to 
be a huge hassle. 
 
 But  something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
deliberately  trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental 
problem that  keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of 
dementia. 
  
  I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't  because I'm 
writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of  posting 
limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out  with 
the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not  
persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end  
some day 
but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not  worth it.







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 12/26/2013 6:51 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

*/Thanks again for the Christmas present, Richard.  :-)/*
Judy is the gift that keeps on giving. I'm not sure I could do without 
her. I told her years ago Please don't feed it. But she completely 
ignored my plea. So, now that I'm free, you can put money on me giving 
her as much hell as I possible can - in payback for calling me a troll 
and a liar for over a decade and trying get others to shun me. Payback 
can be a bitch!


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits Let Buck MODERATE

2013-12-26 Thread WLeed3
Let Buck moderate
 
 
In a message dated 12/25/2013 11:36:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
pundits...@gmail.com writes:



On 12/25/2013 10:26 PM, _authfriend@yahoo.com_ 
(mailto:authfri...@yahoo.com)  wrote:


But something really does have to be done about  Richard.
Here's something you could do: STFU about  Richard.






Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
On 12/26/2013 7:33 AM, doctordumb...@rocketmail.com wrote:
 As for Richard's postings, they all look the same to me - nothing 
 differentiates one from another, so, no offense, please, but I don't 
 think I have read one in months.
No offense, but none of my posts were addressed to you anyway. When I 
want to address you, I will put in the subject title Dumbass. And, 
anyway what could I post here that you don't already know? Go figure.


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 12/26/2013 8:25 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*In any case, as I go through the posts, I've always skipped quickly 
past Richard's. These days I /do/ have to scan them briefly since he's 
into telling lies about me, and not all of them are instantly 
discernible as such by others. I need to know which of his trolls to 
shut down.*
I knew someone was monitoring all my messages. I already knew that you 
read every single post of mine, and probably have for years. The joke is 
on you for taking me seriously for the past fourteen years. NOTHING is 
to be taken seriously on the internet. Thanks for all your support. Now 
get to work!


[FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
  RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? 


 

 Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, 
several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. 

 

 It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk 
me, and of course to do it with lies.
 


 In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as of 
Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 
160-something.
 

 Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week.
 

 And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't 
legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with 
the rest of Barry's posts this morning.

 

  But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean 
Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the 
people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... 
 

 That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard 
couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the 
outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If 
his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to deal 
with.
 

 And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this 
wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is that? 
Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks of him.
 






Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and more 
people are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of operation. 
Even Barry is reading my messages these days. Now that's better!


Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to Robin's recent 
post about you. You have been totally discredited and now we know who is 
the real stalker and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in 
almost every message you post these days.


All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard. It's that simple.

On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

  RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean?
*/
/*
*/Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were 
created, several people including Judy often made more posts than this 
a week. /*


It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to 
stalk me, and of course to do it with lies.


In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts 
was as of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his 
previous record of 160-something.


Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week.

And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it 
can't legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that 
when I deal with the rest of Barry's posts this morning.


*/ But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that 
the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, 
now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... /*

*/
/*
*That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. 
Richard couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. 
Second, it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts 
that's the problem. If his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, 
that would be no trouble to deal with.*

*
*
*And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed 
this wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How 
pathetic is that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care 
what anybody thinks of him.*

*

*





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
*it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's 
the problem.*
WOW! That was a fast reply. You must be monitoring all my messages. Go 
figure.


And, exactly how would you be knowing if any of my posts were 
outlandish or meaningless, if you haven't been reading them for the 
past fourteen years? You need to stop the fibbing, Judy, and just get 
some work done, before you get laid off for slacking on the job. LoL!


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to 
the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein.  If this is a parody, then 
a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure.


On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, pundits...@gmail.com wrote:


This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure 
from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the 
bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a 
sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you 
mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to 
apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, 
falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is a 
blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of 
embarrassment at her behavior.


I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign 
to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her 
case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there 
should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign  the 
integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and she 
should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think.


Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis 
and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and 
I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You 
were her last supporter and now even you have had admited that Judy is 
in the wrong in this never ending dispute.


When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it 
is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only 
new leadership, but with a change of attitude.


So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to 
see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single 
respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. 
Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. 
Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams


masked zebra wrote:

In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history 
there and the characters I have interacted with.


It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more 
closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from 
the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of 
my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not 
just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing from a 
point of view which I have up until very recently been unable to 
accept—even tolerate. And this was of course because of his refusal to 
take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, these 
were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he 
was right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being 
brave enough to consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in 
reacting to his criticism of me and my posts was preventing me from 
having an experience that I needed to have: namely, that my own 
estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide with the truth, with 
reality.


Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence.

So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in 
this anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct 
in his assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and 
Raunchydog), his judgment of me and my posts is valid as well.


Now I would just ask the readers of FFL—those who have aligned 
themselves with Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, 
with Jim and others—to reconsider their position, since for someone 
like myself to undergo a change of perception this significant, a 
change which I was determined would not and could not happen, suggests 
something very powerful at work here. You remember Saul persecuting 
the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to Damascus by 
Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a fierce 
defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as 
spectacular a transformation of belief, I think there are parallels 
here, and to the extent to which Saul became Paul, I have become a 
very different Robin. I don't say that Barry is Jesus or anything like 
that. That would be absurd. And even if I did think that Barry was 
Christ, I know he would only have contempt for such a view of him. So, 
no, I won't go that far. But I will say that in the main Barry has 
been right all along, and even his most vitriolic and bitter posts 
have been in the service of somehow forcing people to see what they, 
like me, were blind to.


Well, I have been persuaded, and in a way which really means 
something, that Barry is the martyr here, and I can't tell you 
(although Steve perhaps has somewhat had the foretaste of such a 
sensation—but only very mildly) how much better I feel, not just 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
A whole truckload more dishonesty from Barry:
 
  Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on everything 
said about posting limits back during the period when they were being debated 
as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop making 100-150 posts per week 
and STFU: 
  If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently--
 and *nastily*--complaining about the top posters
 here if they were critical of TM and supportive of
 Barry, rather than supportive of TM and critical
 of Barry, I have a nice bridge you might want to
 have a look at.  - Judy Stein, Nov 3, 2006
 
  In other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with her, when she 
was making that many to stalk other people, as she's done consistently for 
almost 20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns the table on her and the other 
Mean Girls, suddenly *she's* the one trying to sell the posting limits bridge 
to other people.
 Can you say Karma, dude?  I think you can.  :-) 
 

 Well, Barry can say that, but he knows it's not true.
 

 Back then the TM critics--especially Barry--were very busy stalking the TM 
defenders on FFL, and the latter were significantly outnumbered by the former. 
There were constant, prolonged battles over TM-related issues; both sides were 
much more militant than they are now. That's why the TM defenders were making 
so many posts: we were under siege. What I wrote above that Barry quotes was 
right on target.
  Here she is proposing the *exact same strategy* currently being used 
against her so effectively by Richard (bold emphasis mine): 
 

 Effectively is in the eye of the wishful thinker. And of course I wasn't 
seriously proposing any strategy in what Barry quotes:
  I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but it's awfully
  convenient for Barry that the three top posters
  just happen to be among his chief critics here--
  so he can try to intimidate us into silence under
  cover of complaining about how much we post. 
 It would be fun to see what he'd do if we 
 were to limit our posts to criticisms of him. 
 - Judy Stein, Nov 2, 2006  Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he 
has *plenty* to say, about many topics, pretty much all of them more 
interesting than Judy Stein. All he had to do was up his quotient of posts 
criticizing Judy and she goes batshit crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the 
people screaming for posting limits again. 
 

 Well, I'm not screaming for posting limits, as Barry knows. I said 
explicitly that it was vanishingly unlikely we would go back to them, for 
several reasons (and Alex has just confirmed one of them: he isn't willing to 
take on limits again).
 

 And as already noted in my earlier post, Richard's criticisms of (read: lies 
about) me are the least of the problem. The rest of his posts are mostly not 
that interesting, and Barry would never in a million years suggest they were if 
he weren't once again turning to the tried-and-true the enemy of my enemy is 
my friend tactic. It's the volume of Richard's insipid posts and trolls and 
lies--volume just for the sake of volume--that are making FFL so unpleasant. 
Attention troll was Barry's entirely apt term for Richard not very long ago.
  The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty clear-cut: 
 

 Lies are frequently simpler and clearer-cut than the reality. They're designed 
to be.
 

  NO ONE but Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered by Richard 
turning the tables and doing to her what she's done to so many others for so 
many years. 
 

 Whoopsie-daisy. We don't know how many are bothered by Richard's excessive 
posting, first of all. They may not be speaking up because they don't want to 
become one of his targets.
 

 More importantly, Richard isn't turning the tables; what he's doing is 
vastly unlike what I do: his attacks consist almost exclusively of falsehoods. 
If I criticize somebody, I do it honestly.
 

 And Barry knows this.
 
 NO ONE is rushing to her defense. 
 

 I don't need anyone to rush to my defense. I've never had any trouble 
handling attacks, especially ones that involve lies, as Barry knows to his 
sorrow. And Richard's attacks and lies are pretty pitiful.
 

  Instead, pretty much everyone is kinda *enjoying* seeing her get a taste of 
her own medicine. 
 

 Uh-huh. We all know Barry has the siddhi of mass reading of minds, don't we, 
folks? My guess is that except for a few people like Feste and Share who have a 
big beef with me, Richard's posts (and my responses, when I make any other than 
the macro) are being ignored.
  Richard has, in fact, given the rest of us who've had to live with this 
woman's insanity for so long a kind of Christmas present, letting us see her 
demonstrate how badly she handles someone doing to her what she does to others. 
I therefore nominate Richard as FFL Santa of the Year.  :-) 
 

 Actually I've been handling Richard quite well, thank you, routinely 
shutting down most of his various trolling lies with that macro 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting LimitsLET BUCK B THE ADMINISTRATOR

2013-12-26 Thread WLeed3


 
In a message dated 12/26/2013 11:15:39 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
authfri...@yahoo.com writes:



A whole truckload more dishonesty from  Barry: 

 Ahem. Let's  hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on everything 
said about posting  limits back during the period when they were being 
debated as a way to get HER  and two other idiots to stop making 100-150 posts 
per week and STFU:  


  If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently--
 and  *nastily*--complaining about the top posters
 here if they were  critical of TM and supportive of
 Barry, rather than supportive of TM  and critical
 of Barry, I have a nice bridge you might want to
  have a look at.  - Judy Stein, Nov 3, 2006

 In  other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with her, when 
she was  making that many to stalk other people, as she's done consistently 
for almost  20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns the table on her and 
the other Mean  Girls, suddenly *she's* the one trying to sell the posting 
limits  bridge to other people.
 

Can you say  Karma, dude?  I think you can.  :-) 


Well, Barry can  say that, but he knows it's not true.


Back then the TM  critics--especially Barry--were very busy stalking the 
TM defenders on FFL,  and the latter were significantly outnumbered by the 
former. There were  constant, prolonged battles over TM-related issues; both 
sides were much more  militant than they are now. That's why the TM 
defenders were making so many  posts: we were under siege. What I wrote above 
that 
Barry quotes was right on  target.


  Here she is proposing the *exact same strategy* currently being used 
against  her so effectively by Richard (bold emphasis mine):  


Effectively is  in the eye of the wishful thinker. And of course I wasn't 
seriously proposing  any strategy in what Barry quotes:






 I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but  it's awfully
 convenient for Barry that the three top  posters
 just happen to be among his chief critics here--
  so he can try to intimidate us into silence under
 cover of  complaining about how much we post. 
 It would be fun to see  what he'd do if we 
 were to limit our posts to criticisms of  him. 

- Judy Stein, Nov 2, 2006


  Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he has *plenty* to say, 
about  many topics, pretty much all of them more interesting than Judy 
Stein. All he  had to do was up his quotient of posts criticizing Judy and she 
goes batshit  crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the people screaming for 
posting limits  again. 


Well, I'm not  screaming for posting limits, as Barry knows. I said 
explicitly that it was  vanishingly unlikely we would go back to them, for 
several reasons (and Alex  has just confirmed one of them: he isn't willing to 
take on limits  again).


And as already  noted in my earlier post, Richard's criticisms of (read: 
lies about) me are  the least of the problem. The rest of his posts are 
mostly not that  interesting, and Barry would never in a million years suggest 
they were if he  weren't once again turning to the tried-and-true the enemy 
of my enemy is my  friend tactic. It's the volume of Richard's insipid 
posts and trolls and  lies--volume just for the sake of volume--that are making 
FFL so unpleasant.  Attention troll was Barry's entirely apt term for 
Richard not very long  ago.


 The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty  clear-cut: 


Lies are frequently  simpler and clearer-cut than the reality. They're 
designed to  be.


 NO  ONE but Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered by 
Richard turning  the tables and doing to her what she's done to so many others 
for 
so many  years. 


Whoopsie-daisy.  We don't know how many are bothered by Richard's excessive 
posting, first of  all. They may not be speaking up because they don't want 
to become one of his  targets.


More importantly,  Richard isn't turning the tables; what he's doing is 
vastly unlike what I do: his attacks consist  almost exclusively of 
falsehoods. If I criticize somebody, I do it  honestly.


And Barry knows  this.

 NO  ONE is rushing to her defense. 


I don't need anyone  to rush to my defense. I've never had any trouble 
handling attacks,  especially ones that involve lies, as Barry knows to his 
sorrow. And Richard's  attacks and lies are pretty pitiful.


  Instead, pretty much everyone is kinda *enjoying* seeing her get a 
taste of  her own medicine. 


Uh-huh. We all  know Barry has the siddhi of mass reading of minds, don't 
we, folks? My guess  is that except for a few people like Feste and Share who 
have a big beef with  me, Richard's posts (and my responses, when I make 
any other than the macro)  are being ignored.


  Richard has, in fact, given the rest of us who've had to live with this 
 woman's insanity for so long a kind of Christmas present, letting us see 
her  demonstrate how badly she handles someone doing to her what she does to  
others. I therefore nominate Richard as 

Re: [FairfieldLife] A scene from our modern American Christmas

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
noozguru, what would really be funny is if they were texting one another! But I 
can definitely relate.





On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 2:29 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net 
wrote:
 
  
Compliments of the Onion (and it looks about like what last night was at 
my relatives):
http://www.theonion.com/articles/relatives-gather-from-across-the-country-to-stare,34842/

The family that texts together stays together.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
Sez Barry, knowing I didn't ask for posting limits, I pointed out to Ann that 
we weren't going to get them (as Alex has confirmed). As he also knows, the 
posting limits were not invented just for me by any means.
 

 The sign of a chronic, compulsive stalker-liar is that he isn't selective in 
what he lies about and ends up telling falsehoods that are ridiculously easily 
refuted, making him even less credible.
 

  I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to 
  just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go 
  offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you 
  can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. 

 I completely understand, and please remember that *I* am not the person asking 
for posting limits again. Hilariously, it's the person who *they were invented 
for* asking for them. 

That said, I *can* think of a more low maintenance version of the Posting 
Limit, should anyone want to take over your function. This version only 
requires the moderator to look at one Post Count post per week, the one that 
comes out after Friday night and that contains the weekly totals. 

If anyone on it has gone over 75 posts, the moderator just blocks their address 
and bans them from posting, FOREVER. 

I already know who the first three people to go would be, and Richard wouldn't 
be one of them.  :-)


  ---In FairfieldLife@{{evilDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote: 
 
 I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. 
 
 However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex 
 is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read 
 the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has 
 made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much 
 runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then 
 reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a 
 huge hassle. 
 
 But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
 deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental 
 problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of 
 dementia. 
 
  I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm 
  writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting 
  limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with 
  the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not 
  persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end 
  some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not 
  worth it.

 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
More lies from the wimp:
  Brings up an interesting question: why don't Judy and Ann filter out 
  Richard? And me and turq and feste and whoever else is on their unacceptable 
  list. 

  Especially if, *as they claim*, neither they nor anyone else here takes 
what any of us says seriously. 
 

 I don't believe we made such a blanket claim, actually. About Barry and 
Richard, yes.
 

 I go after Barry because it's fun to expose him over and over again as someone 
who is not to be taken seriously, as I'm doing now.

 Seems to me they take it VERY seriously indeed. *They*, ironically, are the 
only ones now lobbying for posting limits to cut down the number of things said 
about them. Talk about Egos In A Panic.  :-) 
 

 Talk about one inflated but very shaky ego on a bender of wishful thinking. I 
wasn't lobbying for posting limits, as Barry knows, because it would be 
futile. And as I've already said, if the only posts Richard were making were 
the ones stalking Ann and me, we wouldn't have any problem dealing with that.

 The irony of it all is just too delicious. The very person the FFL Posting 
Limits were invented FOR 
 

 Not, as Barry knows.
 

  is now crying like a baby 
 

 Uh, no, Barry. I'm laughing at you, as usual.
 

  and calling for them again, 
 

 Not, as Barry knows.
 

  to keep someone from doing to her what *she* was doing to many others back 
when they first invented the Posting Limits to get *her* to lighten up.  
 

 As I've already noted, and as Barry knows, I don't lie when I criticize 
somebody, nor do I troll. Richard does both, so he is NOT doing to me what I've 
done to others.
 

 It's amazing the number of lies Barry can churn out in just a few posts, isn't 
it?
 

 

 

 

Thanks again for the Christmas present, Richard.  :-)










Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
I did reply to that post, it was a parody--the whole exchange was a parody--and 
the host of monkeys that just flew out of your butt are throwing poo at you.
 

 For the record, for those who may not remember: Robin didn't leave FFL until 
almost three weeks later, and he left because of a brutally cruel post from 
Curtis commenting on Robin's Open Letter about having struck his students.
 

 Richard knows all this. As he himself has admitted, nothing he says is to be 
taken seriously.
 

 You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the 
wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein.  If this is a parody, then a monkey 
is flying out of my butt. Go figure.
 
 On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the 
discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the 
some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of 
mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like 
to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking 
your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - 
it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of 
embarrassment at her behavior.
 
 I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get 
Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do 
some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on 
this whole mean campaign to malign  the integrity of Richard and Barry and 
Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. 
That's what I think.
 
 Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and 
Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with 
you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter 
and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never 
ending dispute. 
 
 When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time 
to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but 
with a change of attitude.
 
 So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, 
the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms 
Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for 
myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the 
full moon.- Richard Williams
 
 
 masked zebra wrote:
 
 In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and 
the characters I have interacted with.
 
 It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and 
without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry 
appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded 
that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about 
even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very 
recently been unable to accept—even tolerate. And this was of course because of 
his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, 
these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was 
right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to 
consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism 
of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to 
have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide 
with the truth, with reality.
 
 Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence.
 
 So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this 
anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his 
assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and Raunchydog), his judgment 
of me and my posts is valid as well.
 
 Now I would just ask the readers of FFL—those who have aligned themselves with 
Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, with Jim and others—to 
reconsider their position, since for someone like myself to undergo a change of 
perception this significant, a change which I was determined would not and 
could not happen, suggests something very powerful at work here. You remember 
Saul persecuting the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to 
Damascus by Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a fierce 
defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as spectacular a 
transformation of belief, I think there are parallels here, and to the extent 
to which Saul became Paul, I have become a very different Robin. I don't say 
that Barry is Jesus or anything like that. That would be absurd. And even if I 
did think that Barry was Christ, I know he would only have 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion

2013-12-26 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:

 You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the 
wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein.  If this is a parody, then a monkey 
is flying out of my butt. Go figure.
 

 I have it right from the horse's mouth (Robin's) that this was a parody. Go 
figure. I even have it documented in a private email. Go figure some more.
 
 On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the 
discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the 
some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of 
mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like 
to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking 
your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - 
it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of 
embarrassment at her behavior.
 
 I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get 
Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do 
some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on 
this whole mean campaign to malign  the integrity of Richard and Barry and 
Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. 
That's what I think.
 
 Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and 
Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with 
you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter 
and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never 
ending dispute. 
 
 When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time 
to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but 
with a change of attitude.
 
 So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, 
the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms 
Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for 
myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the 
full moon.- Richard Williams
 
 
 masked zebra wrote:
 
 In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and 
the characters I have interacted with.
 
 It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and 
without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry 
appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded 
that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about 
even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very 
recently been unable to accept—even tolerate. And this was of course because of 
his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, 
these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was 
right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to 
consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism 
of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to 
have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide 
with the truth, with reality.
 
 Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence.
 
 So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this 
anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his 
assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and Raunchydog), his judgment 
of me and my posts is valid as well.
 
 Now I would just ask the readers of FFL—those who have aligned themselves with 
Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, with Jim and others—to 
reconsider their position, since for someone like myself to undergo a change of 
perception this significant, a change which I was determined would not and 
could not happen, suggests something very powerful at work here. You remember 
Saul persecuting the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to 
Damascus by Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a fierce 
defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as spectacular a 
transformation of belief, I think there are parallels here, and to the extent 
to which Saul became Paul, I have become a very different Robin. I don't say 
that Barry is Jesus or anything like that. That would be absurd. And even if I 
did think that Barry was Christ, I know he would only have contempt for such a 
view of him. So, no, I won't go that far. But I will say that in the main Barry 
has been right all along, and even his most vitriolic and bitter posts have 
been in the service of somehow forcing people to see what they, like me, were 
blind to.
 
 Well, 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion

2013-12-26 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, awoelflebater@... wrote:

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:

 You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the 
wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein.  If this is a parody, then a monkey 
is flying out of my butt. Go figure.
 

 I have it right from the horse's mouth (Robin's) that this was a parody. Go 
figure. I even have it documented in a private email. Go figure some more.
 

 Oh, BTW, that monkey needs a bath.
 
 On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the 
discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the 
some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of 
mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like 
to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking 
your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - 
it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of 
embarrassment at her behavior.
 
 I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get 
Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do 
some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on 
this whole mean campaign to malign  the integrity of Richard and Barry and 
Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. 
That's what I think.
 
 Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and 
Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with 
you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter 
and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never 
ending dispute. 
 
 When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time 
to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but 
with a change of attitude.
 
 So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, 
the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms 
Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for 
myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the 
full moon.- Richard Williams
 
 
 masked zebra wrote:
 
 In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and 
the characters I have interacted with.
 
 It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and 
without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry 
appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded 
that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about 
even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very 
recently been unable to accept—even tolerate. And this was of course because of 
his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, 
these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was 
right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to 
consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism 
of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to 
have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide 
with the truth, with reality.
 
 Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence.
 
 So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this 
anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his 
assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and Raunchydog), his judgment 
of me and my posts is valid as well.
 
 Now I would just ask the readers of FFL—those who have aligned themselves with 
Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, with Jim and others—to 
reconsider their position, since for someone like myself to undergo a change of 
perception this significant, a change which I was determined would not and 
could not happen, suggests something very powerful at work here. You remember 
Saul persecuting the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to 
Damascus by Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a fierce 
defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as spectacular a 
transformation of belief, I think there are parallels here, and to the extent 
to which Saul became Paul, I have become a very different Robin. I don't say 
that Barry is Jesus or anything like that. That would be absurd. And even if I 
did think that Barry was Christ, I know he would only have contempt for such a 
view of him. So, no, I won't go that far. But I will say that in the main Barry 
has been right all along, and even his most vitriolic and bitter 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be 
taken seriously.
 

 

 What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and more people 
are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of operation. Even Barry is 
reading my messages these days. Now that's better!
 
 Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to Robin's recent post 
about you. You have been totally discredited and now we know who is the real 
stalker and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in almost every message 
you post these days. 
 
 All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard. It's that simple.
 
 On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
 RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? 
 
 
 
 
 Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, 
several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. 
 
 
 
 It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk 
me, and of course to do it with lies.
 
 
 
 In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as of 
Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 
160-something.
 
 
 Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week.
 
 
 And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't 
legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with 
the rest of Barry's posts this morning.
 
 
 
  But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean 
Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're the 
people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... 
 
 
 That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard 
couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the 
outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If 
his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to deal 
with.
 
 
 And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this 
wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is that? 
Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks of him.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] A scene from our modern American Christmas

2013-12-26 Thread Bhairitu
My great nephew showed me a video clip of me reciting a Vedic grace 
from Thanksgiving he posted on Vine.  They always request me to recite 
it. I asked him who the old guy was in the video.


On 12/26/2013 08:19 AM, Share Long wrote:
noozguru, what would really be funny is if they were texting one 
another! But I can definitely relate.




On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 2:29 PM, Bhairitu 
noozg...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

Compliments of the Onion (and it looks about like what last night was at
my relatives):
http://www.theonion.com/articles/relatives-gather-from-across-the-country-to-stare,34842/

The family that texts together stays together.








Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Bhairitu
The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual 
immaturity.  It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on 
the Internet.


On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com wrote:


I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or 
lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then 
they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to 
do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, 
people.




---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.


However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being 
reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and 
Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue 
moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly 
impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't 
matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting 
privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle.



But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of 
mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the 
onset of dementia.




I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm 
writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of 
posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick 
it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is 
nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the 
basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't 
because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.






Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread steve.sundur
That's pretty damned funny Richard.  I don't mean to be an enabler, but I'm 
gonna come out of hiding for this one.


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits Let Buck MODERATE

2013-12-26 Thread Bhairitu
It's a wonder you and Buck can even turn on a computer let alone read 
FFL.   Maybe 15 lifetimes from now Buck will be ready to moderate a 
Yahoo Group.:-D


On 12/26/2013 06:36 AM, wle...@aol.com wrote:


Let Buck moderate
In a message dated 12/25/2013 11:36:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
pundits...@gmail.com writes:




On 12/25/2013 10:26 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

But something really does have to be done about Richard.

Here's something you could do: STFU about Richard.






Re: [FairfieldLife] Feliz Navidad to everyone!

2013-12-26 Thread sharelong60
Richard, Ann's just upset that I caught her trying to pass off last year's tree 
photo as this years! Plus I revealed her lie about my living in a 1 BR flat.

[FairfieldLife] Back on alt.meditation.transcendental...

2013-12-26 Thread TurquoiseB
...people used to refer to Judy as Barry's Wind-Up Toy.

That's because she seems to be run by an ego so fragile and so easily
threatened that it feels it HAS to respond to anything said about who
she is that doesn't jibe with her fantasies of who she is.

She fell it every time I -- or anyone else, for that matter -- trolled
her back then, and she still does, all these years later. Think about
how *many* posts she's made in the last few weeks responding to
Richard's *obvious* attempts to...wait for it...GET HER TO RESPOND.

Richard is WINNING here, folks.

He doesn't really CARE what people think of him. Judy does. In spades.
That's what makes her weak, and so easily controlled.

It really GETS to her when someone has been allowed to say something
about her that doesn't jibe with her internal fantasies of how much
smarter she is than anyone else here, how much more integrity she has
than anyone else here, and how much more she knows (knows: a euphemism
for 'I Googled it') than anyone else here.

And yet, if she was all that, would she be so concerned about every
little Richard post as to spend the amount of time, energy, and posts
she has spent in the last few weeks responding to what even *she* calls
trolls?

Judy is trollbait, and Richard is now the master troll. He *owns* her
silly ass.

I renounce all previous titles, and henceforth declare Judy Richard's
Wind-Up Toy.  :-)





[FairfieldLife] RE: Back on alt.meditation.transcendental...

2013-12-26 Thread steve.sundur
I renounce all previous titles, and henceforth declare Judy Richard's Wind-Up 
Toy.  :-)
  
 Another funny, (objectively speaking)


Re: [FairfieldLife] A scene from our modern American Christmas

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
I know what you mean. As I watch the great nieces and nephews going off to 
college!, I'm more aware of the passing of time. And my family in general is 
dismayed about my longer hair. Evidently older women should not have hair 
beyond shoulder length!





On Thursday, December 26, 2013 10:55 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net 
wrote:
 
  
My great nephew showed me a video clip of me reciting a Vedic grace from 
Thanksgiving he posted on Vine.  They always request me to recite it. I asked 
him who the old guy was in the video.

On 12/26/2013 08:19 AM, Share Long wrote:

  
noozguru, what would really be funny is if they were texting one another! But 
I can definitely relate.






On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 2:29 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net 
wrote:
 
  
Compliments of the Onion (and it looks about like what last night was at 
my relatives):
http://www.theonion.com/articles/relatives-gather-from-across-the-country-to-stare,34842/

The family that texts together stays
  together.







Re: [FairfieldLife] Windows Phone 8

2013-12-26 Thread Bhairitu
Ever since Microsoft used the Rolling Stones Start Me Up to advertise 
Windows 95 shutting down Windows has pretty much remained the same with 
slight (sometimes annoying) variations.  To vary it so much with Windows 
8 is poor design.


On 12/25/2013 06:44 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:


On 12/25/2013 11:41 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
 He was particularly trying to figure out how to shut the notebook down
 since.
How to shut down a computer running Windows 8.

It's not complicated:

1. Mouse over the little gadget in the lower right corner of the screen.
(You can also move your mouse cursor to the upper left corner; same
result. Or, you can press Windows - C on your keyboard.)

2. In the slide-out menu (known as the Charms Bar) that appears, click
Settings.

3. Click the Power button, and then click your desired action: Sleep,
Shut down, or Update and restart.






Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
Because of all the repetition in your posts. You could make a macro of Go 
figure, for instance, and assign it to a single key. No matter how fast you 
type, a single key press would be faster.
 

 Thanks for the link,but why in the world would I need a macro to post a 
reply to you, or to anyone else? Like Barry, I can already key in text at a 
very high rate of speed - I've been playing Letter Invaders for twenty years. 
I will admit using this Toshiba Ultrabook with the chicklet keys slows me down 
some, but on a Rosewill keyboard, the one with the mechanical clicking sound, I 
can hit 99 WPM with one hand tied behind my back. 
 
 Macros are for newbies and nerds who can't type. You'd think that after 
working as a professional editor out of a home office for close to thirty 
years, Judy would have learned one simple fact: the querty keyboard does not 
change - all you have to do is memorize the keyboard layout. It's not 
complicated.
 

 Does your keyboard have the u key instead of the w key next to the q 
key? I've used dozens of keyboards in  my time, and none of them were querty 
keyboards.
 

 Opsie...
 

 guffaw
 
 On 12/25/2013 11:22 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   BTW, Richard, if you'd like to start using macros for all your repetitive 
text, here's the macro program I've been using:
 
 
 http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro 
http://www.tucows.com/preview/518190/AllKeys-Macro 
 
 It's free for the first 30 days, then it costs $30 to register it. Installs 
very easily in Windows, ridiculously simple to use, at least for automating 
text strings. I haven't tried any of its bells and whistles for doing fancier 
stuff, but maybe you'll find them helpful too.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Richard shoots himself in both feet:
 
 
 The only one going over the edge here is you, Ms Stein. If creating a phoney 
macro isn't going over the edge I don't know what is! Nothing I post is to be 
taken seriously
 
 
 Yup, that'll be my new macro.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
 You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the 
wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein.  If this is a parody, then a monkey 
is flying out of my butt. Go figure.


 I have it right from the horse's mouth (Robin's) that this was a parody. Go 
figure. I even have it documented in a private email. Go figure some more. 

Whoops, watch out for the monkeys flying out of Richard's butt! They're pelting 
him with poo, but they're laughing so hard at him that their aim is a bit off. 
You don't want to get in the line of fire.
 

 Robin and I called that exchange our irony duel in private. We were pretty 
pleased with ourselves, I must confess.
 

 





Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
Gee, Bhairitu, Barry was extremely fond of the posting limits. You don't mean 
to suggest he's spiritually immature, do you?
 

 The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity.  It's 
like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. 
 
 On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@... mailto:j_alexander_stanley@... 
wrote:
 
   I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to 
just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go 
offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can 
damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people.
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
 I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.
 
 
 However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex 
is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read 
the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made 
managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs 
itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating 
posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle.
 
 
 But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental 
problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia.
 
 
 
 I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing 
it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At 
least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we 
say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to 
drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice 
if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it. 
 
 
 
 
 
 



[FairfieldLife] RE: Back on alt.meditation.transcendental...

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
...people used to refer to Judy as Barry's Wind-Up Toy. 

 

 Actually, Barry used to refer to me that way, especially after having been 
particularly uncomfortably wound up by me.  Don't think he fooled anybody, 
though.
 

 That's because she seems to be run by an ego so fragile and so easily 
threatened that it feels it HAS to respond to anything said about who she is 
that doesn't jibe with her fantasies of who she is.
 

 As I've already pointed out, I go after Barry to expose him as a liar and a 
fantasist. Whether the lies and fantasies in any given instance are about me or 
somebody else, or even something having nothing to do with FFL members, is 
incidental.
 

 The above and what follows below are just the usual fantasies about me he's 
been indulging in for the last 18 years to console himself for always being the 
loser.
 

 

 

 

She fell it every time I -- or anyone else, for that matter -- trolled her back 
then, and she still does, all these years later. Think about how *many* posts 
she's made in the last few weeks responding to Richard's *obvious* attempts 
to...wait for it...GET HER TO RESPOND. 

Richard is WINNING here, folks. 

He doesn't really CARE what people think of him. Judy does. In spades. That's 
what makes her weak, and so easily controlled. 

It really GETS to her when someone has been allowed to say something about her 
that doesn't jibe with her internal fantasies of how much smarter she is than 
anyone else here, how much more integrity she has than anyone else here, and 
how much more she knows (knows: a euphemism for 'I Googled it') than anyone 
else here. 

And yet, if she was all that, would she be so concerned about every little 
Richard post as to spend the amount of time, energy, and posts she has spent in 
the last few weeks responding to what even *she* calls trolls? 

Judy is trollbait, and Richard is now the master troll. He *owns* her silly 
ass. 

I renounce all previous titles, and henceforth declare Judy Richard's Wind-Up 
Toy.  :-)






Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion

2013-12-26 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:

  You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the 
wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein.  If this is a parody, then a monkey 
is flying out of my butt. Go figure.


 I have it right from the horse's mouth (Robin's) that this was a parody. Go 
figure. I even have it documented in a private email. Go figure some more. 

Whoops, watch out for the monkeys flying out of Richard's butt! They're pelting 
him with poo, but they're laughing so hard at him that their aim is a bit off. 
You don't want to get in the line of fire.
 

 Robin and I called that exchange our irony duel in private. We were pretty 
pleased with ourselves, I must confess.
 

 Yes, it was one of the first times that he really had a good chuckle with me 
about this conversation between you two. He thought it was bloody hilarious and 
I don't really think he imagined for a moment that anyone would take it 
seriously. However, he didn't care what anyone believed, I don't think, he just 
was having far too much fun with you on this one. I don't think he realized how 
irony challenged many people are at FFL or even how they would be willing to, 
at any opportunity, use the seeming ambiguity of whether or not it was irony, 
to some silly advantage to win an argument.
 

 







[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Gee, Bhairitu, Barry was extremely fond of the posting limits. You
don't mean to suggest he's spiritually immature, do you?

As Bhairitu is probably aware, Barry was fond of the posting limits
because Judy was not. They *were*, after all, created with the express
purpose of trying to teach Judy and two others some self-control.
Knowing that she in particular had none, I saw them as a way to get her
to reveal how *little* self-control she really has.

Who is the frequent poster who, during the entire lifespan of the
Posting Limits, never overposted, even once? (That would be moi.)

Who is the frequent poster who posted out and wound up sitting on the
Got No Self Control Bench more than all but one other poster? (That
would be Judy. She spent as I remember eight *weeks* sitting on that
bench because she couldn't control herself.)

How could I *not* like a setup like that? I'd wind her up, and more
often than not she'd lose SO much control that she'd post out and we'd
be free of her for a week. :-)

Now there are no more Posting Limits, so that opportunity for fun is
beyond us. But now Richard has taken over as Wind-Up Master anyway, so
he's free to make Judy dance any way he wants to.  :-)

  The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual
immaturity.  It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on
the Internet.

  On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@
mailto:j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:

I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or
lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they
should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do
simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people.

  ---In FairfieldLife@{{evilDomain}}, authfriend@ mailto:authfriend@
wrote:

  I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.


  However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being
reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's
too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus
which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly impossible. As
long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if
it involves removing and then reinstating posting privileges on a fairly
regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle.


  But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of
mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the
onset of dementia.



  I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because
I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of
posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it
out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if
not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL
will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky.
He's just not worth it.




[FairfieldLife] RE: Back on alt.meditation.transcendental...

2013-12-26 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, steve.sundur@... wrote:

 I renounce all previous titles, and henceforth declare Judy Richard's Wind-Up 
Toy.  :-)
  
 Another funny, (objectively speaking)
 

 Oh no Steve, I do believe Ricky is Sharon's wind-up toy. All we need now is a 
screwdriver to tighten all the loose screws.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Feliz Navidad to everyone!

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
No, Share, Ann wasn't upset about the tree photo. Nor did she lie about your 
flat. Uncle Feste will be disappointed in you for not having absorbed his 
explication of what lying means.
 

 People who have been caught in falsehoods, as I pointed out not long ago, have 
a tendency to misuse the term lie in the hope of making the person who caught 
them look as bad as they do. You do this, Barry does this, Richard does this. 
It's malicious and cowardly and deeply dishonest.
 

 
  Richard, Ann's just upset that I caught her trying to pass off last year's 
tree photo as this years! Plus I revealed her lie about my living in a 1 BR 
flat. 



[FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard

2013-12-26 Thread bobpriced
Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; let's review 
what we know about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to 
determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go 
the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for 
companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor; 
second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model - 
although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard 
some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing; 
third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers, 
teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA 
foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be 
beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF; 
fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL 
wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from 
Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to 
rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't 
call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're 
both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she 
subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade 
compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be 
confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they 
both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might 
wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the 
WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever 
wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few 
- tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a 
bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have 
limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear 
lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard 
in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that 
nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in 
their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will 
inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for 
example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap - 
just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be 
captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming 
off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be 
back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts 
practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a 
particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do 
the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our 
well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he 
has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR.  And with our best wishes, 
here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that 
Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be 
referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and 
keeping supper warm:
 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE

 

 Go figure! 


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Bhairitu
I have always been opposed to posting limits because they display a lack 
of maturity and ability to use the Internet.  I only created the post 
count script because people weren't even adult enough to maintain their 
own count.  And like I often said to Alex, if he were to mention to the 
Yahoo crew that we had posting limits they would have astonishingly 
responded you have what?


On 12/26/2013 09:19 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*Gee, Bhairitu, Barry was /extremely/ fond of the posting limits. You 
don't mean to suggest he's spiritually immature, do you?*



The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual 
immaturity.  It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on 
the Internet.


On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@...
mailto:j_alexander_stanley@... wrote:

I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or 
lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then 
they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others 
to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking 
grip, people.




---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... 
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:


I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.


However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being 
reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and 
Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue 
moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly 
impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that 
doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating 
posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a 
huge hassle.



But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of 
mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the 
onset of dementia.




I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because 
I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement 
of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to 
stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is 
nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the 
basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't 
because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.







[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
 Gee, Bhairitu, Barry was extremely fond of the posting limits. You don't 
mean to suggest he's spiritually immature, do you? 
 As Bhairitu is probably aware, Barry was fond of the posting limits because 
Judy was not. 

 

 This is one of the very few true things Barry has said in this discussion. He 
saw the posting limits as a chance to stalk me to get back at me for my 
criticisms of him, as well as cutting down on the number of criticisms. He 
didn't, and doesn't, care about how many posts folks make except to the extent 
it gives him something to stalk the people he doesn't like about. It's 
completely opportunistic.
 

 Barry's count of the number of times various people posted out was even more 
flawed than his purported counts usually are. It was impossible for him to 
access enough of the data to get an accurate count, and he acknowledged this 
when he posted it. That fact appears to have gone conveniently down his memory 
hole.
 

 In any case, eight is way too high for me.
 

 The rest of this is just more of Barry's endless fantasizing.
 

 

 

 

  They *were*, after all, created with the express purpose of trying to teach 
Judy and two others some self-control. Knowing that she in particular had none, 
I saw them as a way to get her to reveal how *little* self-control she really 
has. 

Who is the frequent poster who, during the entire lifespan of the Posting 
Limits, never overposted, even once? (That would be moi.)

Who is the frequent poster who posted out and wound up sitting on the Got No 
Self Control Bench more than all but one other poster? (That would be Judy. She 
spent as I remember eight *weeks* sitting on that bench because she couldn't 
control herself.)

How could I *not* like a setup like that? I'd wind her up, and more often than 
not she'd lose SO much control that she'd post out and we'd be free of her for 
a week. :-)

Now there are no more Posting Limits, so that opportunity for fun is beyond us. 
But now Richard has taken over as Wind-Up Master anyway, so he's free to make 
Judy dance any way he wants to.  :-)

  The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity. 
  It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. 
 
 On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@ mailto:j_alexander_stanley@ 
 wrote: 
 
 I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to 
 just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go 
 offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you 
 can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people. 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@{{evilDomain}}, authfriend@ mailto:authfriend@ wrote: 
 
 I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit. 
 
 
 However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex 
 is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read 
 the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has 
 made managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much 
 runs itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then 
 reinstating posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a 
 huge hassle. 
 
 
 But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
 deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental 
 problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of 
 dementia. 
 
 
 
 I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm 
 writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting 
 limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, 
 shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in 
 his need to drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it 
 would be nice if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged 
people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes a 
lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first 
threefor I've seen. Wowzie!




On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 9:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com 
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  




---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:


Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a liar or he 
has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin its a parody of Judy 
- she can't seem to understand that she is the butt of everyone's joke and has 
been for years. If what Robin said was a parody, Judy seemed to miss it, since 
she failed to post a single comment about it after Robin left the group. What 
Judy doesn't realize is that she is the reason Robin left.

Poor Ricky Retardo. The reason Robin left was because he had much more 
important things to do, things that would be far and away beyond your 
comprehension or your depth. I have this on the highest authority. Why not 
obsess on something else for a while? I know, why don't you and Sharon discuss 
what you talk about best - nothing.


On 12/25/2013 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote:

  
Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed with 
attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You attribute 
the worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the case. It is 
quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here in the past (I 
don't follow your links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie has to be 
deliberate. The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions 
expressed may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred 
distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false accusations. 

There is no need to respond with links that prove what
  you are saying, because unlike you I have no interest in
  going back to the archives to check on something I may
  have said a long time ago. Who cares? Only you. The truth
  is that you are a malicious individual who has an
  obsessive need to brand people you do not like as liars.
  It is a very ugly trait, auth. Of course you are unable to
  see it for yourself, but again I ask you: Why do so many
  people on this forum despise you? Why are you always
  involved in arguments here in which everyone is a liar
  except you? The best thing you could do now would be to
  apologize for your insulting language toward me, but that
  would require a level of decency on your part that you
  have never before shown. 



---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:


(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something 
not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)


In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you and 
Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the reasons for your 
need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)



So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer and kind 
words.



---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:


If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough in the past 
couple of days to know you and Feste are lying jackasses. No need to go back 
any further than that.


 Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did or didn't dump 
you. If they were, they could go back and re-read all of Robin's messages. 
Go figure. 


On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... wrote:

  
 Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was Robin's purported 
defection from me to Barry.
At some point you are going to have to face reality, Judy. The first step in 
this direction would to stop the fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever 
persuade anyone on this forum that you are the only one with integrity.

In withdrawing from FFL
I have had time to
reflect upon my history
there and the characters
I have interacted with.

It will perhaps come as
a shock to some, but in
reading Barry more
closely and without the
intense bias that has
gripped me right from
the start when Barry
appeared to make himself
immune to the effects of
  

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: for Emily Bob, to thank Richard, Share finally replies about Ann's tree photo

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
I support Richard because not only are his posts humorous and interesting and 
having good spiritual knowledge, but they are also kind, for the most part. He 
even says that you are probably nice in person.





On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 4:03 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
You support Richard, who has more fantasies about me and Ann and others than I 
can count. What's up with that, Share? Why don't you correct his fantasies too? 
And Barry's? Not to mention your own fantasies about us. Who's living in a 
fantasy world? Seems kinda inconsistent, don't you think? Like, hypocritical?

 Actually I live in a 2 BR, 1 1/2 bath townhouse with dining room and 
breakfast nook. The rest is also Ann's fantasy about me. 






On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 3:05 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
wrote:
 
  
On 12/24/2013 10:51 AM, awoelflebater@... wrote:

Judy, there is a reason Share is living alone as an older woman in a 
one-bedroom flat in the middle of Iowa. And it's not because she chose this.
You mean compared to an even older woman working out of a home office near a 
beach in New Jersey, and not because she chose this?





[FairfieldLife] Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr Collaborate for Meditation in Schools

2013-12-26 Thread nablusoss1008

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJg5mKuCh7A 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJg5mKuCh7A

[FairfieldLife] Christmas Carols at Mass

2013-12-26 Thread obbajeeba
The first time I went to Christmas Day Mass since all of my adult lifetime. 
What Jyotish significance is that? 
:)

[FairfieldLife] Re: Classical Masterpieces

2013-12-26 Thread Richard Williams
Johann Strauss II

[image: Inline image 1]

The Blue Danube Waltz - Vienna Philharmonic - Vals del Danubio Azul
http://youtu.be/_CTYymbbEL4

Tales from the Vienna Woods - Brazil Orquestra Filarmônica, Belo Horizonte
http://youtu.be/MaOVp8FfGRo

Johann Strauss II was an Austrian composer of light music, particularly
dance music and operettas. He composed over 400 waltzes, polkas,
quadrilles, and other types of dance music, as well as several operettas
and a ballet. In his lifetime, he was known as The Waltz King, and was
largely then responsible for the popularity of the waltz in Vienna during
the 19th century. Some of Johann Strauss's most famous works include The
Blue Danube, and Tales from the Vienna Woods.

Read more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Strauss_II


On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 Richard Wagner

 [image: Inline image 1]

 Rienzi Overture (Full) - The Symphony Orchestra of the LISZT School of
 Music, Weimar
 http://youtu.be/URIwWtwn6qA

 Wilhelm Richard Wagner was a German composer, theater director,
 polemicist, and conductor who is primarily known for his operas. Wagner
 revolutionized opera through his concept of the Gesamtkunstwerk (total
 work of art), by which he sought to synthesis the poetic, visual, musical
 and dramatic arts, with music subsidiary to drama, and which was announced
 in a series of essays between 1849 and 1852. Wagner realized these ideas
 most fully in the first half of the four-opera cycle Der Ring des
 Nibelungen (The Ring of the Nibelung).

 Read more:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Wagner

 A note on Wagner:

 Apparently Wagner wore pink underwear, climbed trees, and liked to stand
 on his head. To match his pink pink underwear he often wore satin breeches,
 a pink eiderdown-padded house robe and pink slippers with the rose
 bouquets. In spite of this, some people think he wrote some nice music. Go
 figure.

 As a young college student I listened to several of his operas (works) in
 two courses of music appreciation. I attended this course twice so that I
 could get the perspective from two different professors of music. We would
 sit here for hours listening to the arias,which were translated,probably
 because nobody in the class could understand all those complicated German
 words.

 You can always tell a genuine Wagner opera because they last for hours on
 end when performed on the stage. One critic at the time wrote about a
 Wagner opera:

 Of all the clumsy,lumbering, boggling, baboon-blooded stuff I ever saw on
 a human stage; of all the affected, sapless, soul-less, beginingless,
 endless, topless, bottomless, topsy-turviest doggerel of sound I ever
 endured the deadliness of,that eternity of nothing was the deadliest.

 Work cited:

 'Lives of the Musical Greats'
 by Victor Borge
 Doubleday-Tarcher, 1971
 p. 119



 On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 Igor Stravinsky

 [image: Inline image 2]

 The Firebird - Gergiev · Vienna Philarmonic
 http://youtu.be/RZkIAVGlfWk

 Petrushka - Boston Symphony Orchestra
 http://youtu.be/ZZIEKCN-rIU

 The Rite of Spring (Le Sacre du printemps) - Leonard Bernstein
 http://youtu.be/5Kyso5VmZ6g

 Igor Stravinsky is considered to be one of the most important and
 influential composers of the 20th century. Stravinsky's compositional
 career was notable for its stylistic diversity. He first achieved
 international fame with three ballets commissioned by the impresario Sergei
 Diaghilev and first performed in Paris by Diaghilev's Ballets Russes: The
 Firebird (1910), Petrushka (1911) and The Rite of Spring (1913). Stravinsky
 was named by Time magazine as one of the 100 most influential people of the
 century.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igor_Stravinsky


 On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Richard Williams 
 pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 [image: Inline image 1]

 Aram Khachaturian - Sabre Dance, Seiji Ozawa
 http://youtu.be/ejIk_Za-q4Y

 Sabre Dance is a movement in the final act of the ballet Gayane (1942)
 by Aram Khachaturian. It is considered Khachaturian's most famous work. It
 is based on Armenian folk music, especially its middle section.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabre_Dance

 [image: Inline image 2]

 Aram Khachaturian was a Soviet Armenian composer. Alongside Sergei
 Prokofiev and Dmitri Shostakovich, Khachaturian is sometimes called one of
 the three 'titans' of Soviet music. He is also considered 'one of the major
 musicians' of the 20th century.

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aram_Khachaturian


 On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 [image: Inline image 3]

 Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - Piano Concerto No. 21 in C Andante (2nd
 Movement) - Daniel Barenboim
 http://youtu.be/DRCEwy5XQSs

 The second movement was featured in the 1967 Swedish film Elvira
 Madigan.

 Elvira Madigan is a 1967 Swedish film directed by Bo Widerberg, based
 on the tragedy of the Danish 

Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
Apparently Bob learned nothing from Robin, not even how to form a break 
between paragraphs. Get back to us Bob, after you take a few computer 
lessons at a community college. Thanks for the post, but I don't have 
time to reformat for easier reading. Go figure.


On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpri...@yahoo.com wrote:


Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; 
*let's review what we know* about Barry and Richard, and what they 
have in common - to determine if their new found passion for each 
other has the legs needed to go the distance: first, they both believe 
their PCs' are desirable substitutes for companions with heartbeats - 
your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor; second, they both 
believe vanity publishing is a viable business model - although one 
could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard some 
disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing; 
third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as 
writers, teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF 
and WIKIPEDIA foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt 
(Richard appears to be beyond child bearing years) would they name the 
child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF; fourth, they both believe there is a huge 
market of lurkers waiting in the FFL wings for more of their 
prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from Texas that 
believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to rename 
herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't 
call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, 
they're both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular 
humiliation she subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above 
their pay grade compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost 
intelligent* (not to be confused with almost famous*, which they 
seemed to have nailed); seventh, they both appear to be obsessed by 
all things Robin - a neutral observer might wonder if they're not 
envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the WTS ( I'm 
impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever 
wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's 
had a few - tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings 
meet with a bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the 
wrong mantra and have limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and 
macros); finally, they both appear lonesome - which is how they met 
over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard in a laundry room: with 
so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that nuptials for 
these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in 
their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union 
that will inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on 
the road; for example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry 
heads out for a cafe rap - just as Richard has prepared a 6 course 
gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be captivating enough for Barry, 
but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming off the rails and Barry 
digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be back. We can 
also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts 
practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts 
a particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: 
who will do the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, 
but I think with our well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the 
high road, because, once he has a spouse we won't be hearing as much 
from RR.  And with our best wishes, here are some moves for Mr. Wright 
(being so conservative, we'll assume that Richard will be taking 
Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be referred to as the 
wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and keeping 
supper warm:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE


Go figure!






Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
Ann has some pretty deep-seated prejudices - I tried to advise her of 
this, but apparently she is under the Judy spell: combative and nasty 
and just plain old mean-spirited. She seemed pretty nice back when Robin 
was around - Iwonder if that had any effect on her writing style.


It looks like we are down to just two writers on the forum, Barry and 
Richard. Judy, with some help from Ann, got rid of all the other good 
writers - Vaj, Curtis, and Robin. Bill has a lot of promise - he 
obviously knows a lot, but he is busy earning a living and that's a good 
thing. I'm sure he has better things to do than try to give any 
knowledge to Judy. Bill knocked her off as a poser a long time ago.


On 12/26/2013 12:03 PM, Share Long wrote:
With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally 
challenged people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard 
who, imo, contributes a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here 
before, but this is the first threefor I've seen. Wowzie!



On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 9:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com 
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:




---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:

Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a 
liar or he has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin 
its a parody of Judy - she can't seem to understand that she is the 
butt of everyone's joke and has been for years. If what Robin said was 
a parody, Judy seemed to miss it, since she failed to post a single 
comment about it after Robin left the group. What Judy doesn't realize 
is that she is the reason Robin left.


Poor Ricky Retardo. The reason Robin left was because he had much more 
important things to do, things that would be far and away beyond your 
comprehension or your depth. I have this on the highest authority. Why 
not obsess on something else for a while? I know, why don't you and 
Sharon discuss what you talk about best - nothing.


On 12/25/2013 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote:

Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so 
obsessed with attacking other people that you lose all clarity of 
judgment. You attribute the worst of motives and intentions to others 
when such is not the case. It is quite possible that I have 
misremembered something I wrote here in the past (I don't follow your 
links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie has to be deliberate. 
The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions expressed 
may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred 
distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false 
accusations.


There is no need to respond with links that prove what you are 
saying, because unlike you I have no interest in going back to the 
archives to check on something I may have said a long time ago. Who 
cares? Only you. The truth is that you are a malicious individual who 
has an obsessive need to brand people you do not like as liars. It is 
a very ugly trait, auth. Of course you are unable to see it for 
yourself, but again I ask you: Why do so many people on this forum 
despise you? Why are you always involved in arguments here in which 
everyone is a liar except you? The best thing you could do now would 
be to apologize for your insulting language toward me, but that would 
require a level of decency on your part that you have never before 
shown.



---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... 
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:


*(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to 
something not-so-full of festive cheer and kind words?)*

*
*
*In any case, I'd rather be obsessive than a lying jackass like you 
and Richard. (The jackass part is because your lies, and the 
reasons for your need to tell them, are so pathetically transparent.)*



So here comes The Obsessive on Christmas Day, full of festive cheer 
and kind words.


---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

*If they're interested, they've already seen more than enough
in the past couple of days to know you and Feste are lying
jackasses. No need to go back any further than that.*

 Judy, I don't think anyone is interested in why Robin did
or didn't dump you. If they were, they could go back and
re-read all of Robin's messages. Go figure. 

On 12/24/2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@...
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:


 Remember, folks, the whole point of the exchange was
Robin's purported defection from me to Barry.

At some point you are going to have to face reality,
Judy. The first step in this direction would to stop the
fibbing. Then, and only then will you ever persuade
anyone on this forum that you are the only one with
integrity.

In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon
my history there 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams

Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work, Barry!

On 12/26/2013 10:14 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


A whole truckload more dishonesty from Barry:


*/ Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on 
everything said about posting limits back during the period when they 
were being debated as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop 
making 100-150 posts per week and STFU: /*

 If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently--
 and *nastily*--complaining about the top posters
 here if they were critical of TM and supportive of
 Barry, rather than supportive of TM and critical
 of Barry, I have a nice bridge you might want to
 have a look at.  - Judy Stein, Nov 3, 2006

*/ In other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with her, 
when she was making that many to stalk other people, as she's done 
consistently for almost 20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns the 
table on her and the other Mean Girls, suddenly *she's* the one trying 
to sell the posting limits bridge/**/ to other people./*

*/Can you say Karma, dude?  I think you can.  :-) /*

Well, Barry can say that, but he knows it's not true.

Back then the TM critics--especially Barry--were very busy stalking 
the TM defenders on FFL, and the latter were significantly outnumbered 
by the former. There were constant, prolonged battles over TM-related 
issues; both sides were much more militant than they are now. That's 
why the TM defenders were making so many posts: we were under siege. 
What I wrote above that Barry quotes was right on target.
*/ Here she is proposing the *exact same strategy* currently being 
used against her so effectively by Richard (bold emphasis mine): /*


Effectively is in the eye of the wishful thinker. And of course I 
wasn't seriously proposing any strategy in what Barry quotes:


 I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but it's awfully
 convenient for Barry that the three top posters
 just happen to be among his chief critics here--
 so he can try to intimidate us into silence under
 cover of complaining about how much we post. *
 It would be fun to see what he'd do if we
 were to limit our posts to criticisms of him.*

- Judy Stein, Nov 2, 2006

*/ Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he has *plenty* to 
say, about many topics, pretty much all of them more interesting than 
Judy Stein. All he had to do was up his quotient of posts criticizing 
Judy and she goes batshit crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the 
people screaming for posting limits again. /*


Well, I'm not screaming for posting limits, as Barry knows. I said 
explicitly that it was vanishingly unlikely we would go back to them, 
for several reasons (and Alex has just confirmed one of them: he isn't 
willing to take on limits again).


And as already noted in my earlier post, Richard's criticisms of 
(read: lies about) me are the least of the problem. The rest of his 
posts are mostly not that interesting, and Barry would never in a 
million years suggest they were if he weren't once again turning to 
the tried-and-true the enemy of my enemy is my friend tactic. It's 
the volume of Richard's insipid posts and trolls and lies--volume just 
for the sake of volume--that are making FFL so unpleasant. Attention 
troll was Barry's entirely apt term for Richard not very long ago.


*/ The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty clear-cut: /*
*/
/*
Lies are frequently simpler and clearer-cut than the reality. They're 
designed to be.

*/
/*
*/ NO ONE but Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered by 
Richard turning the tables and doing to her what she's done to so many 
others for so many years. /*


Whoopsie-daisy. We don't know how many are bothered by Richard's 
excessive posting, first of all. They may not be speaking up because 
they don't want to become one of his targets.


More importantly, Richard isn't turning the tables; what he's doing 
is vastly unlike what I do: his attacks consist almost exclusively of 
falsehoods. If I criticize somebody, I do it honestly.


And Barry knows this.

*/ NO ONE is rushing to her defense. /*
*/
/*
*I don't need anyone to rush to my defense. I've never had any 
trouble handling attacks, especially ones that involve lies, as Barry 
knows to his sorrow. And Richard's attacks and lies are pretty pitiful.*

*/
/*
*/ Instead, pretty much everyone is kinda *enjoying* seeing her get 
a taste of her own medicine. /*


Uh-huh. We all know Barry has the siddhi of mass reading of minds, 
don't we, folks? My guess is that except for a few people like Feste 
and Share who have a big beef with me, Richard's posts (and my 
responses, when I make any other than the macro) are being ignored.
*/ Richard has, in fact, given the rest of us who've had to live 
with this woman's insanity for so long a kind of Christmas present, 
letting us see her demonstrate how badly she handles someone doing to 
her what 

Re: [FairfieldLife] When Barry Met Richard

2013-12-26 Thread bobpriced


 

---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:

 Apparently Bob learned nothing from Robin, not even how to form a break 
between paragraphs. Get back to us Bob, after you take a few computer lessons 
at a community college. Thanks for the post, but I don't have time to reformat 
for easier reading. Go figure.
 

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps6ck1ejoAw
 On 12/26/2013 11:52 AM, bobpriced@... mailto:bobpriced@... wrote:
 
   
 Now that Richard has admitted he does not have a wife named Rita; let's review 
what we know about Barry and Richard, and what they have in common - to 
determine if their new found passion for each other has the legs needed to go 
the distance: first, they both believe their PCs' are desirable substitutes for 
companions with heartbeats - your basic blow up doll with a microprocessor; 
second, they both believe vanity publishing is a viable business model - 
although one could be forgiven for thinking Barry might be hiding from Richard 
some disappointing page visitor stats - new lovers do that sort of thing; 
third, both appear to have a keen desire to be taken seriously as writers, 
teachers, and intellectuals and seem to believe that HUFFPUFF and WIKIPEDIA 
foot notes have replaced libraries - if they adopt (Richard appears to be 
beyond child bearing years) would they name the child HUFFPEDIA or WIKIPUFF; 
fourth, they both believe there is a huge market of lurkers waiting in the FFL 
wings for more of their prodigious output; fifth, both are military brats from 
Texas that believe Share is not a brat - its rumored Share is planning to 
rename herself with the FFL handle: Barry's and Richard's wind-up toy (don't 
call her a blow up doll, she obviously has no microprocessor); sixth, they're 
both obsessed with Judy and appear hooked on the regular humiliation she 
subjects them to - as if playing so far out of above their pay grade 
compensates for the exchanges making them look *almost intelligent* (not to be 
confused with almost famous*, which they seemed to have nailed); seventh, they 
both appear to be obsessed by all things Robin - a neutral observer might 
wonder if they're not envious of Ann because they missed the chance to join the 
WTS ( I'm impressed that Richard claims he recently read everything Robin ever 
wrote; I just hope Barry doesn't, in a moment of cruelty - when he's had a few 
- tell Richard about Robin's wish that his WTS era writings meet with a 
bonfire); eighth, they both appear to have gotten the wrong mantra and have 
limited knowledge of Eastern thought (and macros); finally, they both appear 
lonesome - which is how they met over the internet - Barry in a cafe, Richard 
in a laundry room: with so many Shared interests how could anyone doubt that 
nuptials for these two are meant to be, and just around the corner; I think in 
their declining years these two have what it takes to make a union that will 
inspire the poets: of course, there will be a few bumps on the road; for 
example, how will Richard cope the first time Barry heads out for a cafe rap - 
just as Richard has prepared a 6 course gourmet meal (Richard will no doubt be 
captivating enough for Barry, but habits die hard), I imagine Richard coming 
off the rails and Barry digging in his heels and refusing to say when he'll be 
back. We can also only pray that Richard will get to safety when Barry starts 
practicing his martial arts in front of his old laptop when Judy posts a 
particularly devastating post. And, I know what you're thinking: who will do 
the laundry'; frankly, in love much remains a mystery, but I think with our 
well wishes these two have a shot; lets take the high road, because, once he 
has a spouse we won't be hearing as much from RR.  And with our best wishes, 
here are some moves for Mr. Wright (being so conservative, we'll assume that 
Richard will be taking Barry's last name; I know he would not like to be 
referred to as the wind-up toy) to practice while he's doing the laundry, and 
keeping supper warm:
 
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-bsf2x-aeE
 
 
 
 Go figure! 
 
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
Maybe Barry was posting a parody. Judy is easily the target of a parody, 
as Robin demonstrated. Apparently Judy will fall for any parody, even 
one by Robin that looks like the truth. Go figure.


Everyone knows that Judy was the top poster around here for years - she 
can't resist posting some snarky reply to just about every post 
submitted. But, when someone posts something on topic, she just ignores 
it. Why? Because she knows next to nothing about yoga or meditation, 
obviously, or even music for that matter.


par·o·dy
verb
past tense: parodied; past participle: parodied

 1. produce a humorously exaggerated imitation of (a writer, artist, or 
genre).




On 12/26/2013 10:22 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


Sez Barry, knowing I didn't ask for posting limits, I pointed out to 
Ann that we weren't going to get them (as Alex has confirmed). As he 
also knows, the posting limits were not invented just for me by any means.



The sign of a chronic, compulsive stalker-liar is that he isn't 
selective in what he lies about and ends up telling falsehoods that 
are ridiculously easily refuted, making him even less credible.



 I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to
just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they
should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to
do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking
grip, people.

*/I completely understand, and please remember that *I* am not the 
person asking for posting limits again. Hilariously, it's the person 
who *they were invented for* asking for them.


That said, I *can* think of a more low maintenance version of the 
Posting Limit, should anyone want to take over your function. This 
version only requires the moderator to look at one Post Count post per 
week, the one that comes out after Friday night and that contains the 
weekly totals.


If anyone on it has gone over 75 posts, the moderator just blocks 
their address and bans them from posting, FOREVER.


I already know who the first three people to go would be, and Richard 
wouldn't be one of them. :-)



/* ---In FairfieldLife@{{evilDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:

 I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.

 However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being 
reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and 
Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue 
moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly 
impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that doesn't 
matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating posting 
privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle.


 But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of 
mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the 
onset of dementia.


  I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because 
I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of 
posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick 
it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is 
nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the 
basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't 
because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread obbajeeba
Posting limits are for complainers.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 12/26/2013 10:38 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

*the only posts Richard were making were the ones stalking Ann and me*
You need to stop the lying, Ms Stein. For the record, Judy has been 
stalking me for over a decade. The proof is in the archives. I came over 
here long before Judy, to try to get away from her, but here she is, 
posting the same old snarky comments, except now she has a macro 
running in Microsoft Notepad. Go figure.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Christmas Carols at Mass

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
depends Obbajee, did you receive Communion, just wafer or both wafer and wine 
(-:





On Thursday, December 26, 2013 12:27 PM, obbajeeba no_re...@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:
 
  
The first time I went to Christmas Day Mass since all of my adult lifetime. 
What Jyotish significance is that? 
:)


[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams  wrote:

 Ooopsie, somebody's buttons got pushed again. Go figure. Good work,
Barry!


You reminded me how easy it is TO push her buttons, so I figured I'd add
to your work. :-)

The most fascinating thing about it all, from a psychological point of
view, is that Judy actually thinks she's winning. So does Ann. But then,
both of them are so clueless that they climbed all over themselves to
see who could kiss Robin's ass the most. Not exactly the brightest
candles on the cake.


 On 12/26/2013 10:14 AM, authfriend@... wrote:
 
  A whole truckload more dishonesty from Barry:
 
 
  */ Ahem. Let's hear what the self-proclaimed resident expert on
  everything said about posting limits back during the period when
they
  were being debated as a way to get HER and two other idiots to stop
  making 100-150 posts per week and STFU: /*
   If anybody thinks Barry would be so insistently--
   and *nastily*--complaining about the top posters
   here if they were critical of TM and supportive of
   Barry, rather than supportive of TM and critical
   of Barry, I have a nice bridge you might want to
   have a look at.  - Judy Stein, Nov 3, 2006
 
  */ In other words, making 150+ posts a week was just FINE with
her,
  when she was making that many to stalk other people, as she's done
  consistently for almost 20 years. But when Richard cleverly turns
the
  table on her and the other Mean Girls, suddenly *she's* the one
trying
  to sell the posting limits bridge/**/ to other people./*
  */Can you say Karma, dude?  I think you can.  :-) /*
 
  Well, Barry can say that, but he knows it's not true.
 
  Back then the TM critics--especially Barry--were very busy
stalking
  the TM defenders on FFL, and the latter were significantly
outnumbered
  by the former. There were constant, prolonged battles over
TM-related
  issues; both sides were much more militant than they are now. That's
  why the TM defenders were making so many posts: we were under siege.
  What I wrote above that Barry quotes was right on target.
  */ Here she is proposing the *exact same strategy* currently being
  used against her so effectively by Richard (bold emphasis mine):
/*
 
  Effectively is in the eye of the wishful thinker. And of course I
  wasn't seriously proposing any strategy in what Barry quotes:
 
   I'm sure it's just a coincidence, but it's awfully
   convenient for Barry that the three top posters
   just happen to be among his chief critics here--
   so he can try to intimidate us into silence under
   cover of complaining about how much we post. *
   It would be fun to see what he'd do if we
   were to limit our posts to criticisms of him.*
 
  - Judy Stein, Nov 2, 2006
 
  */ Richard didn't even have to do that. Turns out he has *plenty*
to
  say, about many topics, pretty much all of them more interesting
than
  Judy Stein. All he had to do was up his quotient of posts
criticizing
  Judy and she goes batshit crazy, and now (ironically) is one of the
  people screaming for posting limits again. /*
 
  Well, I'm not screaming for posting limits, as Barry knows. I said
  explicitly that it was vanishingly unlikely we would go back to
them,
  for several reasons (and Alex has just confirmed one of them: he
isn't
  willing to take on limits again).
 
  And as already noted in my earlier post, Richard's criticisms of
  (read: lies about) me are the least of the problem. The rest of his
  posts are mostly not that interesting, and Barry would never in a
  million years suggest they were if he weren't once again turning to
  the tried-and-true the enemy of my enemy is my friend tactic. It's
  the volume of Richard's insipid posts and trolls and lies--volume
just
  for the sake of volume--that are making FFL so unpleasant.
Attention
  troll was Barry's entirely apt term for Richard not very long ago.
 
  */ The bottom line here is pretty simple, and pretty clear-cut:
/*
  */
  /*
  Lies are frequently simpler and clearer-cut than the reality.
They're
  designed to be.
  */
  /*
  */ NO ONE but Judy's clone Ann seem to be the least bit bothered
by
  Richard turning the tables and doing to her what she's done to so
many
  others for so many years. /*
 
  Whoopsie-daisy. We don't know how many are bothered by Richard's
  excessive posting, first of all. They may not be speaking up because
  they don't want to become one of his targets.
 
  More importantly, Richard isn't turning the tables; what he's
doing
  is vastly unlike what I do: his attacks consist almost exclusively
of
  falsehoods. If I criticize somebody, I do it honestly.
 
  And Barry knows this.
 
  */ NO ONE is rushing to her defense. /*
  */
  /*
  *I don't need anyone to rush to my defense. I've never had any
  trouble handling attacks, especially ones that involve lies, as
Barry
  knows to his sorrow. And Richard's attacks and lies are pretty
pitiful.*
  */
  /*
  */ 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
You are mistaken- Robin's post was not a parody; his post was true in 
all respects. Judy is the only person I know of that thinks Robin's post 
was a parody. If what Ann said was accurate, Robin wouldn't have time to 
post a parody to FFL - he has better things to do than parody Judy.


The fact is, that Judy can't tell a parody from an opinion. But, Judy 
already knows this. And, apparently Judy can't tell a parody from 
posting a true statement. And why? She's obviously got an ego about a 
mile wide and growing by the hour. Denial is not just a river in Egypt. 
Go figure.


Nothing Judy posts from now on will be taken seriously - I have now 
exposed her as a mere poser and she is very angry. Judy Stein is a 
loser, period. Finished. Wrap.her.up.and.toss.her.in.the.can. Stick a 
fork in her - she is done on this forum.


On 12/26/2013 10:49 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*I did reply to that post, it was a parody--the whole exchange was a 
parody--and the host of monkeys that just flew out of your butt are 
throwing poo at you.*


*
*

For the record, for those who may not remember: Robin didn't leave FFL 
until almost three weeks later, and he left because of a brutally 
cruel post from Curtis commenting on Robin's Open Letter about having 
struck his students.



Richard knows all this. As he himself has admitted, nothing he says is 
to be taken seriously.




You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to 
the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, 
then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure.


On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:

This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure 
from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the 
bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a 
sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you 
mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to 
apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, 
falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is 
a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of 
embarrassment at her behavior.


I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign 
to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in 
her case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree 
there should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign  
the integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and 
she should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think.


Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and 
Curtis and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with 
her - and I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody 
else. You were her last supporter and now even you have had admited 
that Judy is in the wrong in this never ending dispute.


When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it 
is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only 
new leadership, but with a change of attitude.


So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to 
see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single 
respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. 
Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. 
Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams


masked zebra wrote:

In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history 
there and the characters I have interacted with.


It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more 
closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from 
the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects 
of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right 
not just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing 
from a point of view which I have up until very recently been 
unable to accept—even tolerate. And this was of course because of his 
refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For 
Barry, these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it 
turns out he was right. At least this is the conclusion I have come 
to by being brave enough to consider that my own defensiveness and 
touchiness in reacting to his criticism of me and my posts was 
preventing me from having an experience that I needed to have: 
namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide 
with the truth, with reality.


Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence.

So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in 
this anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only 
correct in his assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and 
Raunchydog), his judgment of me and my posts is valid as well.


Now I would just ask the readers of 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
So, by your logic, if a Canadian posts a message, it's a parody; if two 
guys from Texas post messages, they are lies. Thanks for the 
clarification. You certainly must have all the inside information on 
this one. Good work!


So, why can't the Canadian speak for himself? He didn't seem to have any 
trouble over-posting here in the past. Go figure.



On 12/26/2013 10:52 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:


---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:

You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to 
the wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein. If this is a parody, 
then a monkey is flying out of my butt. Go figure.


I have it right from the horse's mouth (Robin's) that this was a 
parody. Go figure. I even have it documented in a private email. Go 
figure some more.


On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:

This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure 
from the discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the 
bad behavior of the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a 
sad comment on the state of mind of one of the respondents that you 
mention in this message. I would like to take this opportunity to 
apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking your integrity, 
falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - it is 
a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of 
embarrassment at her behavior.


I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign 
to get Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in 
her case, and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I agree 
there should be a moratorium on this whole mean campaign to malign  
the integrity of Richard and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and 
she should apologize to the group or leave. That's what I think.


Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and 
Curtis and Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with 
her - and I agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody 
else. You were her last supporter and now even you have had admited 
that Judy is in the wrong in this never ending dispute.


When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it 
is time to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only 
new leadership, but with a change of attitude.


So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to 
see you, the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single 
respondent, Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. 
Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. 
Stay on the path, beware of the full moon.- Richard Williams


masked zebra wrote:

In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history 
there and the characters I have interacted with.


It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more 
closely and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from 
the start when Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects 
of my posts, I have concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right 
not just about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry is arguing 
from a point of view which I have up until very recently been 
unable to accept—even tolerate. And this was of course because of his 
refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For 
Barry, these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it 
turns out he was right. At least this is the conclusion I have come 
to by being brave enough to consider that my own defensiveness and 
touchiness in reacting to his criticism of me and my posts was 
preventing me from having an experience that I needed to have: 
namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide 
with the truth, with reality.


Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence.

So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in 
this anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only 
correct in his assessment of Judy (see his argument with Emily and 
Raunchydog), his judgment of me and my posts is valid as well.


Now I would just ask the readers of FFL—those who have aligned 
themselves with Judy, with Robin, with the now departed Bob Price, 
with Jim and others—to reconsider their position, since for someone 
like myself to undergo a change of perception this significant, a 
change which I was determined would not and could not happen, 
suggests something very powerful at work here. You remember Saul 
persecuting the Christians and then being struck down on the Road to 
Damascus by Christ, and in the violence of his conversion becoming a 
fierce defender of Christ. Well, although I did not undergo quite as 
spectacular a transformation of belief, I think there are parallels 
here, and to the extent to which Saul became Paul, I have become a 
very different Robin. I don't say that Barry is Jesus or 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: for Emily Bob, to thank Richard, Share finally replies about Ann#39;s tree photo

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
You didn't answer my questions. I guess they must be pretty threatening to you.
 
  I support Richard because not only are his posts humorous and interesting 
and having good spiritual knowledge, but they are also kind, for the most part. 
He even says that you are probably nice in person. 
 

 
 
 On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 4:03 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
 
   You support Richard, who has more fantasies about me and Ann and others than 
I can count. What's up with that, Share? Why don't you correct his fantasies 
too? And Barry's? Not to mention your own fantasies about us. Who's living in a 
fantasy world? Seems kinda inconsistent, don't you think? Like, hypocritical?
 

  Actually I live in a 2 BR, 1 1/2 bath townhouse with dining room and 
breakfast nook. The rest is also Ann's fantasy about me. 

 

 
 
 On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 3:05 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
wrote:
 
   
 On 12/24/2013 10:51 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
 Judy, there is a reason Share is living alone as an older woman in a 
one-bedroom flat in the middle of Iowa. And it's not because she chose this. 
You mean compared to an even older woman working out of a home office near a 
beach in New Jersey, and not because she chose this?
 
 

 




 
 
 
 



 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
When did I ever say otherwise? And, how would you know, since you don't 
even read my messages. Go figure.



On 12/26/2013 10:53 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he 
says is to be taken seriously.*




What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and 
more people are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of 
operation. Even Barry is reading my messages these days. Now that's 
better!


Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to Robin's recent 
post about you. You have been totally discredited and now we know who 
is the real stalker and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in 
almost every message you post these days.


All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard. It's that simple.

On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:


  RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean?
*/
/*
*/Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were 
created, several people including Judy often made more posts than 
this a week. /*


It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity 
to stalk me, and of course to do it with lies.


In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts 
was as of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his 
previous record of 160-something.


Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week.

And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it 
can't legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that 
when I deal with the rest of Barry's posts this morning.


*/ But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is 
that the Mean Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits 
again, now that they're the people being stalked, instead of the 
stalkers... /*

*/
/*
*That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. 
Richard couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. 
Second, it's the outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless 
posts that's the problem. If his only posts were those stalking Ann 
and me, that would be no trouble to deal with.*

*
*
*And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed 
this wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How 
pathetic is that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care 
what anybody thinks of him.*

*

*







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
Richard I think Xeno and merudanda are also good writers, in the category of 
writers of long and medium sized posts. I think I'm pretty good with the one or 
two liners. go figure! (-:





On Thursday, December 26, 2013 12:44 PM, Richard J. Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  
Ann has some pretty deep-seated prejudices - I tried to advise her of this, but 
apparently she is under the Judy spell: combative and nasty and just plain old 
mean-spirited. She seemed pretty nice back when Robin was around - Iwonder if 
that had any effect on her writing style. 

It looks like we are down to just two writers on the forum, Barry
  and Richard. Judy, with some help from Ann, got rid of all the
  other good writers - Vaj, Curtis, and Robin. Bill has a lot of
  promise - he obviously knows a lot, but he is busy earning a
  living and that's a good thing. I'm sure he has better things to
  do than try to give any knowledge to Judy. Bill knocked her off as
  a poser a long time ago.

On 12/26/2013 12:03 PM, Share Long wrote:

  
With one nickname, Ricky Retardo, Ann manages to slur mentally challenged 
people; Hispanics who still have an accent; and Richard who, imo, contributes 
a lot of good too FFL. I've seen twofers here before, but this is the first 
threefor I've seen. Wowzie!




On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 9:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com 
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  




---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, punditster@... wrote:


Thanks for taking up the slack, Feste. Good work! Either Robin is a liar or he 
has really put a lot over on this forum. Either way, Robin its a parody of 
Judy - she can't seem to understand that she is the butt of everyone's joke 
and has been for years. If what Robin said was a parody, Judy seemed to miss 
it, since she failed to post a single comment about it after Robin left the 
group. What Judy doesn't realize is that she is the reason Robin left.


Poor Ricky Retardo. The reason Robin left was because he had much more 
important things to do, things that would be far and away beyond your 
comprehension or your depth. I have this on the highest authority. Why not 
obsess on something else for a while? I know, why don't you and Sharon discuss 
what you talk about best - nothing.


On 12/25/2013 11:03 AM, feste37 wrote:

  
Just one of your innumerable problems, auth, is that you are so obsessed with 
attacking other people that you lose all clarity of judgment. You attribute 
the worst of motives and intentions to others when such is not the case. It 
is quite possible that I have misremembered something I wrote here in the 
past (I don't follow your links), but to misremember is not to lie. A lie has 
to be deliberate. The person has to know he is telling an untruth. Opinions 
expressed may also change over time. That is not lying, either. Your hatred 
distorts your ability to use words correctly, so you make false accusations. 

There is no need to respond
  with links that prove what
  you are saying, because unlike
  you I have no interest in
  going back to the archives to
  check on something I may have
  said a long time ago. Who
  cares? Only you. The truth is
  that you are a malicious
  individual who has an
  obsessive need to brand people
  you do not like as liars. It
  is a very ugly trait, auth. Of
  course you are unable to see
  it for yourself, but again I
  ask you: Why do so many people
  on this forum despise you? Why
  are you always involved in
  arguments here in which
  everyone is a liar except you?
  The best thing you could do
  now would be to apologize for
  your insulting language toward
  me, but that would require a
  level of decency on your part
  that you have never before
  shown. 



---In
  FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, 
authfriend@... wrote:


(Gee, Feste, did you maybe wonder whether I might be responding to something 
not-so-full of 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Five, six, and seven for Feste

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be 
taken seriously.

 

 
  Ann has some pretty deep-seated prejudices - I tried to advise her of this, 
but apparently she is under the Judy spell: combative and nasty and just plain 
old mean-spirited. She seemed pretty nice back when Robin was around - Iwonder 
if that had any effect on her writing style. 
 
 It looks like we are down to just two writers on the forum, Barry and Richard. 
Judy, with some help from Ann, got rid of all the other good writers - Vaj, 
Curtis, and Robin. Bill has a lot of promise - he obviously knows a lot, but he 
is busy earning a living and that's a good thing. I'm sure he has better things 
to do than try to give any knowledge to Judy. Bill knocked her off as a poser a 
long time ago. 

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread Richard J. Williams
It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum 
to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be 
posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting 
snarky messages all day and into the night. She used to be the top 
poster, but now I've left her in the dust. A writer, Judy is NOT.


On 12/26/2013 10:56 AM, Bhairitu wrote:


The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual 
immaturity.  It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on 
the Internet.


On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com wrote:


I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or 
lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then 
they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others 
to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking 
grip, people.




---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.


However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being 
reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and 
Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue 
moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly 
impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that 
doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating 
posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a 
huge hassle.



But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of 
mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the 
onset of dementia.




I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because 
I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement 
of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to 
stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He is 
nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the 
basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't 
because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be 
taken seriously.

 

  Maybe Barry was posting a parody. Judy is easily the target of a parody, as 
Robin demonstrated. Apparently Judy will fall for any parody, even one by Robin 
that looks like the truth. Go figure.
 
 Everyone knows that Judy was the top poster around here for years - she can't 
resist posting some snarky reply to just about every post submitted. But, when 
someone posts something on topic, she just ignores it. Why? Because she knows 
next to nothing about yoga or meditation, obviously, or even music for that 
matter.
 
 par·o·dy
 verb
 past tense: parodied; past participle: parodied
 
  1. produce a humorously exaggerated imitation of (a writer, artist, or 
genre). 
 

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be 
taken seriously.

 

  The only posts Richard were making were the ones stalking Ann and me You 
need to stop the lying, Ms Stein. For the record, Judy has been stalking me for 
over a decade. The proof is in the archives. I came over here long before Judy, 
to try to get away from her, but here she is, posting the same old snarky 
comments, except now she has a macro running in Microsoft Notepad. Go figure. 

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Post Count Thu 26-Dec-13 00:15:11 UTC

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
Richard, didn't Maharishi say once that everything is important but nothing is 
serious?





On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:14 PM, Richard J. Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  
When did I ever say otherwise? And, how would you know, since you don't even 
read my messages. Go figure.


On 12/26/2013 10:53 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:

  
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to 
be taken seriously.




What happened to your macro? The difference now is that more and more people 
are standing up to you and your tyrannical mode of operation. Even Barry is 
reading my messages these days. Now that's better!

Your name is now mud all over the internet, thanks to
  Robin's recent post about you. You have been totally
  discredited and now we know who is the real stalker
  and troll and liar is - you are confirming this in
  almost every message you post these days. 

All you have to do, Ms Stein is STFU about Richard.
  It's that simple.


On 12/26/2013 8:45 AM, authfriend@... wrote:

  
  RR at 125. Is this a record yet? And what does it mean? 



Not even *close* to a record. Back *before* the posting limits were created, 
several people including Judy often made more posts than this a week. 


It's to be expected that Barry would jump on this as an opportunity to stalk 
me, and of course to do it with lies.


In the first place, as Barry knows, the 125 total of RIchard's posts was as 
of Wednesday. By Friday, he'll have gone well above his previous record of 
160-something.


Before posting limits, I rarely made more than 160 posts per week.


And as Barry knows, the situation back then was so different that it can't 
legitimately be compared to what it is now. I'll get to that when I deal with 
the rest of Barry's posts this morning.


 But mark my words...the next thing that's going to happen is that the Mean 
Girls are going to start calling for Posting Limits again, now that they're 
the people being stalked, instead of the stalkers... 


That's not why Ann and I wished a limit could be imposed again. Richard 
couldn't stalk his way out of a paper bag, first of all. Second, it's the 
outlandish number of all his mostly meaningless posts that's the problem. If 
his only posts were those stalking Ann and me, that would be no trouble to 
deal with.


And BTW, Barry knew when he wrote this that we had already expressed this 
wish, although he's pretending here to be predicting it. How pathetic is 
that? Especially for the dude who claims he doesn't care what anybody thinks 
of him.








[FairfieldLife] please UNSUBSCRIBE me

2013-12-26 Thread Peter St.John
no time for all the mail, folks, please unsubscribe me!
Thanks!
PS


[FairfieldLife] RE: Christmas Carols at Mass

2013-12-26 Thread jr_esq
You have just become one of the CEOs, meaning Christmas and Easter Only.


[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
More, um, wishful thinking from Barry. ;-)
 
  The most fascinating thing about it all, from a psychological point of 
view, is that Judy actually thinks she's winning. So does Ann. But then, both 
of them are so clueless that they climbed all over themselves to see who could 
kiss Robin's ass the most. Not exactly the brightest candles on the cake. 

 
 Poor Barry was wildly, insanely jealous of Robin. Still is. Brings him up at 
every opportunity even long after he's left. I've never seen Barry so 
distraught by a single poster.
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be 
taken seriously.

 

 

  You are mistaken- Robin's post was not a parody; his post was true in all 
respects. Judy is the only person I know of that thinks Robin's post was a 
parody. If what Ann said was accurate, Robin wouldn't have time to post a 
parody to FFL - he has better things to do than parody Judy. 
 
 The fact is, that Judy can't tell a parody from an opinion. But, Judy already 
knows this. And, apparently Judy can't tell a parody from posting a true 
statement. And why? She's obviously got an ego about a mile wide and growing by 
the hour. Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Go figure.
 
 Nothing Judy posts from now on will be taken seriously - I have now exposed 
her as a mere poser and she is very angry. Judy Stein is a loser, period. 
Finished. Wrap.her.up.and.toss.her.in.the.can. Stick a fork in her - she is 
done on this forum. 
 
 On 12/26/2013 10:49 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   I did reply to that post, it was a parody--the whole exchange was a 
parody--and the host of monkeys that just flew out of your butt are throwing 
poo at you.
 
 
 For the record, for those who may not remember: Robin didn't leave FFL until 
almost three weeks later, and he left because of a brutally cruel post from 
Curtis commenting on Robin's Open Letter about having struck his students.
 
 
 Richard knows all this. As he himself has admitted, nothing he says is to be 
taken seriously.
 
 
 You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the 
wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein.  If this is a parody, then a monkey 
is flying out of my butt. Go figure.
 
 On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
   This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the 
discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of the 
some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the state of 
mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I would like 
to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior in attacking 
your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the place of truth - 
it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain amount of 
embarrassment at her behavior.
 
 I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was wrong in her campaign to get 
Barry. Her hateful hostility should be reason for pause, in her case, and to do 
some hard thinking about this matter. I agree there should be a moratorium on 
this whole mean campaign to malign  the integrity of Richard and Barry and 
Curtis - she should cease and she should apologize to the group or leave. 
That's what I think.
 
 Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning person; but you and Curtis and 
Barry and Richard have now identified what is wrong with her - and I agree with 
you that Judy is the problem here, and nobody else. You were her last supporter 
and now even you have had admited that Judy is in the wrong in this never 
ending dispute. 
 
 When the chorus and the entire band rebels against the conductor, it is time 
to revise the entire opera and start all over with not only new leadership, but 
with a change of attitude.
 
 So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart. It is just sad to see you, 
the Masked Zebra quit the group over the actions of a single respondent, Ms 
Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to this. Again, speaking for 
myself, good luck in all your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of the 
full moon.- Richard Williams
 
 
 masked zebra wrote:
 
 In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and 
the characters I have interacted with.
 
 It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely and 
without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when Barry 
appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have concluded 
that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right about 
even myself. Barry is arguing from a point of view which I have up until very 
recently been unable to accept—even tolerate. And this was of course because of 
his refusal to take me seriously in what I said in all my posts. For Barry, 
these were tedious, narcissistic, and melodramatic. Well, it turns out he was 
right. At least this is the conclusion I have come to by being brave enough to 
consider that my own defensiveness and touchiness in reacting to his criticism 
of me and my posts was preventing me from having an experience that I needed to 
have: namely, that my own estimate of my posts did not necessarily coincide 
with the truth, with reality.
 
 Whereas *his* estimate of my posts did achieve such correspondence.
 
 So, as much as I hate to do this, given how much I have invested in this 
anti-Barry project, I have to admit it: Barry is not only correct in his 
assessment of 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be 
taken seriously.

 

  It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum to 
look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be posting 
something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting snarky messages 
all day and into the night. She used to be the top poster, but now I've left 
her in the dust. A writer, Judy is NOT. 
 
 On 12/26/2013 10:56 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
 
   
 The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual immaturity.  It's 
like needing training wheels or diapers to be on the Internet. 
 
 On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@... mailto:j_alexander_stanley@... 
wrote:
 
   I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or lazy to 
just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then they should go 
offline and do something else. Stop expecting others to do simple shit you can 
damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking grip, people.
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
 I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.
 
 
 However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being reimposed. Alex 
is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and Rick's too busy to even read 
the posts here except once in a blue moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made 
managing a group nearly impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs 
itself, that doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating 
posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a huge hassle.
 
 
 But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either he's 
deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind of mental 
problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe the onset of dementia.
 
 
 
 I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because I'm writing 
it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement of posting limits. At 
least at 50 I might, just might, be able to stick it out with the, shall we 
say, obsessive troller Richard. He is nothing if not persistent in his need to 
drive this forum into the basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice 
if it wasn't because of Ricky. He's just not worth it. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Revelation and Conversion

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
Richard is in tune with Maharishi who said that everything is important but 
nothing is serious.





On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:27 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
As Richard himself admitted in post #368186 yesterday, nothing he says is to be 
taken seriously.



 You are mistaken- Robin's post was not a parody; his post was true in all 
respects. Judy is the only person I know of that thinks Robin's post was a 
parody. If what Ann said was accurate, Robin wouldn't have time to post a 
parody to FFL - he has better things to do than parody Judy. 

The fact is, that Judy can't tell a parody from an opinion. But,
  Judy already knows this. And, apparently Judy can't tell a parody
  from posting a true statement. And why? She's obviously got an ego
  about a mile wide and growing by the hour. Denial is not just a
  river in Egypt. Go figure.

Nothing Judy posts from now on will be taken seriously - I have
  now exposed her as a mere poser and she is very angry. Judy Stein
  is a loser, period. Finished. Wrap.her.up.and.toss.her.in.the.can.
  Stick a fork in her - she is done on this forum. 


On 12/26/2013 10:49 AM, authfriend@... wrote:

  
I did reply to that post, it was a parody--the whole exchange was a 
parody--and the host of monkeys that just flew out of your butt are throwing 
poo at you.


For the record, for those who may not remember: Robin didn't leave FFL until 
almost three weeks later, and he left because of a brutally cruel post from 
Curtis commenting on Robin's Open Letter about having struck his students.


Richard knows all this. As he himself has admitted, nothing he says is to be 
taken seriously.



You can pretty much tell how much this post of Robin's nailed Judy to the 
wall, by the lack of a reply by Ms Stein.  If this is a parody, then a monkey 
is flying out of my butt. Go figure.


On 12/26/2013 7:04 AM, punditster@... wrote:

  
This is a very shocking message from Robin concerning his departure from the 
discussion group. For the record, I must apologize for the bad behavior of 
the some of informants here on FairfieldLife. It is a sad comment on the 
state of mind of one of the respondents that you mention in this message. I 
would like to take this opportunity to apologize for Ms Stein's bad behavior 
in attacking your integrity, falsely accusing you of posting parody in the 
place of truth - it is a blatant display of bad form and I feel a certain 
amount of embarrassment at her behavior.

I can't speak for anyone else here but Judy was
  wrong in her campaign to get Barry. Her hateful
  hostility should be reason for pause, in her case,
  and to do some hard thinking about this matter. I
  agree there should be a moratorium on this whole
  mean campaign to malign  the integrity of Richard
  and Barry and Curtis - she should cease and she
  should apologize to the group or leave. That's
  what I think.

Judy may be an intelligent and well-meaning
  person; but you and Curtis and Barry and Richard
  have now identified what is wrong with her - and I
  agree with you that Judy is the problem here, and
  nobody else. You were her last supporter and now
  even you have had admited that Judy is in the
  wrong in this never ending dispute. 

When the chorus and the entire band rebels against
  the conductor, it is time to revise the entire
  opera and start all over with not only new
  leadership, but with a change of attitude.

So, I hope Judy reads this and takes it to heart.
  It is just sad to see you, the Masked Zebra quit
  the group over the actions of a single respondent,
  Ms Stein.It is sad, very sad, that it has come to
  this. Again, speaking for myself, good luck in all
  your future endeavors. Stay on the path, beware of
  the full moon.- Richard Williams


masked zebra wrote:


In withdrawing from FFL I have had time to reflect upon my history there and 
the characters I have interacted with.

It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in
reading Barry more closely and without the
intense bias that has gripped me right from the
start when Barry appeared to make himself immune
to the effects of my posts, I have concluded
that essentially Barry is right. Right not just
about Judy; but right about even myself. Barry
is arguing from a point of view which I have up

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: for Emily Bob, to thank Richard, Share finally replies about Ann's tree photo

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
Judy, I answered one of your questions even though imo they're all pretty dumb.





On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:14 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
You didn't answer my questions. I guess they must be pretty threatening to you.


 I support Richard because not only are his posts humorous and interesting 
and having good spiritual knowledge, but they are also kind, for the most part. 
He even says that you are probably nice in person. 





On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 4:03 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
 
  
You support Richard, who has more fantasies about me and Ann and others than I 
can count. What's up with that, Share? Why don't you correct his fantasies too? 
And Barry's? Not to mention your own fantasies about us. Who's living in a 
fantasy world? Seems kinda inconsistent, don't you think? Like, hypocritical?

 Actually I live in a 2 BR, 1 1/2 bath townhouse with dining room and 
breakfast nook. The rest is also Ann's fantasy about me. 






On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 3:05 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
wrote:
 
  
On 12/24/2013 10:51 AM, awoelflebater@... wrote:

Judy, there is a reason Share is living alone as an older woman in a 
one-bedroom flat in the middle of Iowa. And it's not because she chose this.
You mean compared to an even older woman working out of a home office near a 
beach in New Jersey, and not because she chose this?







[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams  wrote:

 It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this
forum
 to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be
 posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting
 snarky messages all day and into the night. She used to be the top
 poster, but now I've left her in the dust. A writer, Judy is NOT.

I'd certainly agree with the last sentence. What kind of real writer
would settle for grading other people's papers as a career rather than
try to write something -- anything -- herself?

 On 12/26/2013 10:56 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
 
  The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual
  immaturity.  It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be
on
  the Internet.
 
  On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote:
 
  I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or
  lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then
  they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others
  to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking
  grip, people.
 
 
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@{{emailDomain}}, authfriend@... wrote:
 
  I have to agree, except I'd rather make it a 75-post limit.
 
 
  However, I don't think there's any chance of the limit being
  reimposed. Alex is very unlikely to want to take it back on, and
  Rick's too busy to even read the posts here except once in a blue
  moon. Plus which, apparently Neo has made managing a group nearly
  impossible. As long as the group pretty much runs itself, that
  doesn't matter, but if it involves removing and then reinstating
  posting privileges on a fairly regular basis, it's likely to be a
  huge hassle.
 
 
  But something really does have to be done about Richard. Either
he's
  deliberately trying to kill the group, or he's developed some kind
of
  mental problem that keeps him from seeing what he's doing--maybe
the
  onset of dementia.
 
 
 
  I didn't think I would hear myself say this (and I haven't because
  I'm writing it) but I am formally asking Rick for the reinstatement
  of posting limits. At least at 50 I might, just might, be able to
  stick it out with the, shall we say, obsessive troller Richard. He
is
  nothing if not persistent in his need to drive this forum into the
  basement. FFL will end some day but it would be nice if it wasn't
  because of Ricky. He's just not worth it.
 
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Greater than Jesus?

2013-12-26 Thread Share Long
Yep, John, funny old world we're living in...





On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:42 AM, jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com 
wrote:
 
  
This guy claims to be the one.  And some people believe him.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfgnNHJ2zQc



[FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Limits

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
Oooopsie! Never claimed to be a writer.
 
  It's also a sure sign of defeat in a fair debate. Judy wants this forum 
 to look like the laughing stock of Yahoo Groups. Otherwise she'd be 
 posting something interesting to read instead of wasting time posting 
 snarky messages all day and into the night. She used to be the top 
 poster, but now I've left her in the dust. A writer, Judy is NOT.

 I'd certainly agree with the last sentence. What kind of real writer would 
settle for grading other people's papers as a career rather than try to write 
something -- anything -- herself? 

  On 12/26/2013 10:56 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
 
  The request for posting limits is a sure sign of spiritual 
  immaturity. It's like needing training wheels or diapers to be on 
  the Internet.
 
  On 12/26/2013 03:49 AM, j_alexander_stanley@... wrote:
 
  I absolutely refuse to take it back on. If folks are too stupid or 
  lazy to just fucking filter out what they don't want to read, then 
  they should go offline and do something else. Stop expecting others 
  to do simple shit you can damn well do yourselves. Get a fucking 
  grip, people.

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: for Emily Bob, to thank Richard, Share finally replies about Ann#39;s tree photo

2013-12-26 Thread authfriend
If you'll forgive me, Share, I hardly consider your opinion definitive on what 
is dumb and what is not. I understand why you have to avoid the tough 
questions, though. That's your modus operandi. You couldn't survive otherwise.
 

  Judy, I answered one of your questions even though imo they're all pretty 
dumb. 
 

 
 
 On Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:14 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   You didn't answer my questions. I guess they must be pretty threatening to 
you.
 
  I support Richard because not only are his posts humorous and interesting 
and having good spiritual knowledge, but they are also kind, for the most part. 
He even says that you are probably nice in person. 
 

 
 
 On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 4:03 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
 
   You support Richard, who has more fantasies about me and Ann and others than 
I can count. What's up with that, Share? Why don't you correct his fantasies 
too? And Barry's? Not to mention your own fantasies about us. Who's living in a 
fantasy world? Seems kinda inconsistent, don't you think? Like, hypocritical?
 

  Actually I live in a 2 BR, 1 1/2 bath townhouse with dining room and 
breakfast nook. The rest is also Ann's fantasy about me. 

 

 
 
 On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 3:05 PM, Richard J. Williams punditster@... 
wrote:
 
   
 On 12/24/2013 10:51 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
 Judy, there is a reason Share is living alone as an older woman in a 
one-bedroom flat in the middle of Iowa. And it's not because she chose this. 
You mean compared to an even older woman working out of a home office near a 
beach in New Jersey, and not because she chose this?
 
 

 




 
 
 
 



 
 

 




 
 
 
 



 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





[FairfieldLife] RE: please UNSUBSCRIBE me

2013-12-26 Thread j_alexander_stanley
Kind of a shame you don't have the time to read even one of those emails to see 
the directions for unsubscribing that are found on each and every one of them. 
Because thanks to the glory that is the Neo interface, I get an error when I 
try to unsubscribe you. So, you're SOL until you can figure it out yourself.

 

 You're welcome,

Alex, the ever so slightly grumpy moderator who woke up at 4am to a very bad 
dream

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peter.stjo...@yahoo.com wrote:

 no time for all the mail, folks, please unsubscribe me!
 Thanks!
 PS



 


  1   2   >