[FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Dev on how / when to meditate

2006-09-02 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes Barry2, in this context that must be what he meant and I have 
 ammended the translation to reflect this view:
 http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/upadesh.htm#Gurudevmeditation
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
 
  Paul Mason wrote:
  
  Guru Dev - Shankaracharya Swami Brahmanand Saraswati gives a few 
  words about when and how to meditate.
  Translation by Paul Mason 31st August 2006
  
  At daybreak and in the day do that fit puja and dhyaana etc, 
but 
 at 
  night before sleeping you should certainly do 10-15 minutes of 
 japa 
  of the 'ishhTa mantra kaa japa' and 'dhyaana' of the 'ishhTa 
 muurti' 

That reminded me of YS I 39:

yathaabhimata-dhyaanaad vaa (yathaa+abhimata: as desired)

IMO, many translators seem to think that as desired refers
to the method or style or whatever, of meditation. 
But according to Bhojadeva's comment on that suutra yathaabhimata
refers to the object of meditation, whether outer or inner:

yathaabhimatavastuni baahye candraadaavaabhyantare naaDiicakraadau
vaa bhaavyamaane cetaH sthiriibhavati

A desperate attemp at translation:

By dwelling (??bhaavyamaane) on an as-desired-object (yathaabhimata-
vastuni) [whether] outer (baahye) [like] Moon, etc (candraadau)
or (vaa) inner (aabhyantare) [like] naaDiis or cakras, etc (naaDii-
cakraadau) mind (cetaH) becomes firm [steady?] (sthiriibhavati).










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Iowa: not as bad as bordering South Dakota

2006-09-02 Thread bob_brigante
In examining behavior in 340 regions of the country, the survey found 
that 7 of the top 10 areas for under-age binge drinking — defined as 
five or more drinks at a time — were in Wyoming, Montana and North and 
South Dakota.

At the other end of the scale, some of the lowest areas for under-age 
binge drinking were in the nation's most densely packed cities — parts 
of Washington, D.C., Detroit and Los Angeles. An earlier federal study 
found that rural youths ages 12 and 13 were twice as likely as urban 
youths to abuse alcohol.

With methamphetamine ravaging small towns, Wyoming and other rural 
states have also been fighting a persistent drug problem.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/02/us/02binge.html







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  
   The thing that strikes me as a little odd is that 
   without exception, the TMers I've met who believe 
   that they can perceive or be in communication with
   something of Guru Dev's individual consciousness 
   *also* believe, when you ask them about it, in 
   Maharishi's dogma about what happens to an enlight-
   ened being when they die.
   
   You remember that dogma, right? It's the drop 
   returns to the ocean rap, in which individuality 
   is *over* when the enlightened being dies, kaput, 
   toast, never to appear again.
  
  I don't recall hearing Maharishi ever talk about after death 
  experience, so I am not familiar with that rap of his. 
  
  In any case my personal belief is that the two states, live 
here, or 
  live there (aka death) are pretty much the same- Same Stuff; 
  Different Existence (to parapharase a popular expression...). It 
  doesn't make any sense to me that what we call death should be 
  strange and different. I mean, isn't life here strange and 
different 
  enough??
  
  Considering what you have said above about what Maharishi said 
about 
  the death of enlightened beings, I think it is better for us to 
gain 
  enlightenment ourselves and then better determine what the 
  experience is, regardless of what Maharishi has said on the 
subject, 
  or what we think he has said on the subject.
  
  So, in conclusion, I have not heard Maharishi say anything that 
  contradicts my direct experience of Brahmananda Saraswati.
 
 I just think it's fascinating is all, and I look
 forward to what is inevitably going to happen after
 Maharishi himself dies. 
 
 The *same* people who will claim that he was the
 hottest, most enlightened sage ever and that his
 theories were perfect and correct in every instance
 are going to start claiming that they're in 
 communication with his individual spirit now
 that he's dead. The fact that one of his theories
 would have to be incorrect for this to happen is
 never going to occur to them...


One of his theories that are incorrect that we don't have to wait 
until he dies in order to debunk is his claim that the CIA 
infiltrated the TMO.

I'm still waiting for proof.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  I just think it's fascinating is all, and I look
  forward to what is inevitably going to happen after
  Maharishi himself dies. 
  
  The *same* people who will claim that he was the
  hottest, most enlightened sage ever and that his
  theories were perfect and correct in every instance
  are going to start claiming that they're in 
  communication with his individual spirit now
  that he's dead. The fact that one of his theories
  would have to be incorrect for this to happen is
  never going to occur to them...
 
 One of his theories that are incorrect that we don't have to wait 
 until he dies in order to debunk is his claim that the CIA 
 infiltrated the TMO.
 
 I'm still waiting for proof.

Your desire for proof shows the weakness of your
faith, Shemp. If you were a real student, you
would accept whatever your teacher said as the
absolute word of God. No dome badge for you.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread geezerfreak
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
 deal in contradictions and have different answers
 to life's questions, depending on the state of
 attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 
 
 snicker

cunt.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  
  Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
  deal in contradictions and have different answers
  to life's questions, depending on the state of
  attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 
  
  snicker
 
 cunt.

Now, now.  :-)

Alice is just acting and thinking the way she's 
been taught to act and think by her enlightened
masters. Doncha know that intellectual consistency 
is only a good thing when you can accuse someone
of not having it.  :-)


One can't believe impossible things.
I daresay you haven't had much practice, said 
the queen. When I was your age I always did it 
for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I've 
believed six impossible things before breakfast.

-- Lewis Carroll








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield's future--MIU2

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote:
  
   on 9/1/06 11:15 AM, jyouells2000 at jyouells@ wrote:

 That's not a good sign. What have they been doing with all
 the money
 they HAVEN'T been paying the faculty and staff?

   Who can say for sure? But the Shrivastavas are rumored to be
 living pretty
   well.
  
  
  $100,000 per year goes a long way in India.
  
  Yes, I know, you believe that they're siphoning money for their own
 use from all possible 
  sources world-wide, and perhaps they are. But it takes a while to
 get a million dollar income 
  if you can only siphon $100k at a time...
 
 Who says it's only $100K at a time. It depends on the size and number
 of the suitcases :-  Or how the money is moved between banks.


If you have ANY evidence of this, you should contact the IRS and Treasury Dept, 
not to 
mention the FBI.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Dev on how / when to meditate

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
 premanandpaul@ wrote:
 
  Yes Barry2, in this context that must be what he meant and I have 
  ammended the translation to reflect this view:
  http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/upadesh.htm#Gurudevmeditation
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
  
   Paul Mason wrote:
   
   Guru Dev - Shankaracharya Swami Brahmanand Saraswati gives a few 
   words about when and how to meditate.
   Translation by Paul Mason 31st August 2006
   
   At daybreak and in the day do that fit puja and dhyaana etc, 
 but 
  at 
   night before sleeping you should certainly do 10-15 minutes of 
  japa 
   of the 'ishhTa mantra kaa japa' and 'dhyaana' of the 'ishhTa 
  muurti' 
 
 That reminded me of YS I 39:
 
 yathaabhimata-dhyaanaad vaa (yathaa+abhimata: as desired)
 
 IMO, many translators seem to think that as desired refers
 to the method or style or whatever, of meditation. 
 But according to Bhojadeva's comment on that suutra yathaabhimata
 refers to the object of meditation, whether outer or inner:
 
 yathaabhimatavastuni baahye candraadaavaabhyantare naaDiicakraadau
 vaa bhaavyamaane cetaH sthiriibhavati
 
 A desperate attemp at translation:
 
 By dwelling (??bhaavyamaane) on an as-desired-object (yathaabhimata-
 vastuni) [whether] outer (baahye) [like] Moon, etc (candraadau)
 or (vaa) inner (aabhyantare) [like] naaDiis or cakras, etc (naaDii-
 cakraadau) mind (cetaH) becomes firm [steady?] (sthiriibhavati).


An object that attracts your attention, making it effortless to turn inward.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] The True Believer

2006-09-02 Thread TurquoiseB
Excerpts from The True Believer, by Eric Hoffer, 1952
and other of his works. I'm posting them because they may 
be helpful in understanding why so many TM True Believers 
are so threatened by the existence of Fairfield Life and
its credo (What is wanted is not the will to believe, 
but the wish to find out, which is the exact opposite.) 
Read through them and see if they don't remind you of
a few people whose words you read here every week...




The uncompromising attitude is more indicative of an 
inner uncertainty than a deep conviction. The 
implacable stand is directed more against the doubt 
within than the assailant without.



A doctrine insulates the devout not only against the 
realities around them but also against their own selves. 
The fanatical believer is not conscious of his envy, 
malice, pettiness and dishonesty. There is a wall of 
words between his consciousness and his real self.



Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an 
empty life. Thus people haunted by the purposelessness 
of their lives try to find a new content not only by 
dedicating themselves to a holy cause but also by 
nursing a fanatical grievance. A mass movement offers 
them unlimited opportunities for both.



The effectiveness of a doctrine does not come from 
its meaning but from its certitude. No doctrine 
however profound and sublime will be effective unless 
it is presented as the embodiment of the one and only 
truth. It must be the one word from which all things 
are and all things speak. Crude absurdities, trivial 
nonsense and sublime truths are equally potent in 
readying people for self-sacrifice if they are 
accepted as the sole, eternal truth.

It is obvious, therefore, that in order to be effective 
a doctrine must not be understood, but has to be 
believed in. We can be absolutely certain only about 
things we do not understand. A doctrine that is 
understood is shorn of its strength. Once we understand 
a thing, it is as if it had originated in us. And, 
clearly, those who are asked to renounce the self and 
sacrifice it cannot see eternal certitude in anything 
that originates in that self. The fact that they 
understand a thing fully impairs its validity and 
certitude in their eyes.

The devout are always urged to seek the absolute truth 
with their hearts and not their minds. It is the heart 
which is conscious of God, not the reason. [--Pascal]   
Rudolph Hess, when swearing in the entire Nazi party in 
1934, exhorted his hearers: Do not seek Adolph Hitler 
with your brains; all of you will find him with the 
strength of your hearts.
...
If a doctrine is not unintelligible, it has to be vague; 
and if neither unintelligible nor vague, it has to be 
unverifiable. One has to get to heaven or the distant 
future to determine the truth of an effective doctrine. 
When some part of a doctrine is relatively simple, 
there is a tendency among the faithful to complicate 
it and obscure it. Simple words are made pregnant with 
meaning and made to look like symbols in a secret 
message. There is thus an illiterate air about the 
most literate true believer. He seems to use words as 
if he were ignorant of their true meaning. Hence, 
too, his taste for quibbling, hairsplitting, and 
scholastic tortuousness.



To know a person's religion we need not listen to his 
profession of faith but must find his brand of intolerance.



The savior who wants to turn men into angels is as much a 
hater of human nature as the totalitarian despot who wants 
to turn them into puppets.



The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for 
his own self, the more ready he is to claim all 
excellence for his nation, his religion, his race, 
or his holy cause.



Take away hatred from some people, and you have men 
without faith.



The opposite of the religious fanatic is not the 
fanatical atheist but the gentle cynic who cares not 
whether there is a god or not.



The uncompromising attitude is more indicative of an 
inner uncertainty than a deep conviction. The 
implacable stand is directed more against the doubt 
within than the assailant without.



Vehemence is the expression of a blind effort to 
support and uphold something that can never stand on 
its own...Whether it is our own meaningless self we 
are upholding, or some doctrine devoid of evidence, 
we can do it only in a frenzy of 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Dev on how / when to meditate

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
Excerpts of speech made by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (before he was known 
as such) in which he asked that Guru Dev's 'elevating discourses may 
reach the masses in every nook and corner of our country and abroad' 
- for full text go to 
http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/sources/text/Maheshspeech.htm


The Statement issued by: BAL BRAHMACHARI SHRI MAHESH JI.
15th Oct., 1952

'His aim of life, if the life of a realised soul can be said to 
possess any such aim, is to broadcast the message of the Great Divine 
light that he has himself realised, the Light that is the Soul of all 
human beings. Having himself attained the pinnacle of Self 
development, he aims at transforming the worldly minded people into 
the Godly minded, and through his inner Divine touch to change the 
materialistic hearts of iron into spiritual hearts of gold.'

'Shri Shankaracharya Maharaj has clear insight into the mind and the 
thoughts of the modern age. His teaching and commendments are based 
on sound reasonings which are quite agreeable to any reasonable 
thinker. He is a great critic of prejudices and narrowmindedness 
arising out of irrational love of caste, creed, nationality or 
any ism. His life is a living proof of the Truth of the Vedas and 
Shastras. He has opened a new era of renaissance of True Religion. He 
extends his recognition to anything that is good in any religion. He 
is accessible to all. Everyone can enjoy and derive benefit from his 
holy Darshan and elevating discourses.'

'The great Saint of the Himalayas in coming in your midst and in the 
fitness of the great occasion, I appeal to your good sense to extend 
your valuable support so that his elevating discourses may reach the 
masses in every nook and corner of our country and abroad.'




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
 
  Paul Mason wrote:
  
  Guru Dev - Shankaracharya Swami Brahmanand Saraswati gives a few 
  words about when and how to meditate.
  Translation by Paul Mason 31st August 2006
 
 Paul, just how far do you think MMY would have
 gotten in teaching people around the world to
 meditate if he had been teaching a la Guru Dev?
 
 Or, what do you think would have happened if MMY
 had taught as he did, and these instructions from
 Guru Dev had been translated and made available
 through the TMO?  How many TMers would have 
 decided they were going to try it Guru Dev's way,
 and what would have been the result?  Especially
 in the absence of Guru Dev's personal guidance?
 
 What was MMY going to say, No, no, don't do what
 Guru Dev instructed, do what I instruct?
 
 You keep suggesting that there's something 
 sinister about MMY not promoting Guru Dev's actual
 teaching, but that's one of the silliest criticisms
 I've encountered.
 
 MMY obviously *didn't have a choice* if he wanted
 TM to be universally accepted--or even to *work*,
 for that matter.  The context in which Guru Dev
 taught was just too different.
 
 I suppose MMY could have issued a carefully
 bowdlerized version of Guru Dev's lectures with
 all the sectarian Hinduism taken out.  What would
 you have thought of that?  What would have been
 left?  Would that have been true to Guru Dev's
 intent?
 
 If you want to bash MMY for going global with TM
 instead of staying back in India and teaching a
 few people exactly what Guru Dev taught, ishtas and
 all--or for teaching anything in the first place--
 fine.
 
 But if you don't disapprove of his wanting to
 make TM universal, you really don't have a leg to
 stand on in suggesting that he is dishonoring Guru
 Dev by not promoting his original teachings.  That
 just makes no sense at all.
 
 
 
  At daybreak and in the day do that fit puja and dhyaana etc, 
but 
 at 
  night before sleeping you should certainly do 10-15 minutes of 
 japa 
  of the 'ishhTa mantra kaa japa' and 'dhyaana' of the 'ishhTa 
 muurti' 
  (desired form). From this 'upaasanaa' (sitting near / devout 
  meditation) quick advancement occurs.
  
  In darkness you should sit with eye closed and do japa of the 
 mantra, 
  and in the same way with eye closed you should do dhyana of the 
  ishhTa with the mind. Not on their whole body, you should look 
on 
 the 
  foot or on the mouth area of the head, seeing the full of 
 compassion 
  of our favourite ishhTa, looking infused with tenderness. The 
 vision 
  of the ishhTa becomes one's own desire. You should look not 
 envisage 
  the eye of the ishhTa to be closed. This manner of having seen 
the 
  vision of the infusion of tenderness, doing dhyaana of the 
ishhTa 
 in 
  the heart, you should remain doing japa of the ishhTa mantra. 
From 
  this, the image of the ishhTa will grow and provided that the 
mind 
  gets strengthened and held with the ishhTa then in the end will 
 stay 
  in this condition. On the strength of this you should go across 
 the 
  ocean of samsaara.
  ['Shri Shankaracharya UpadeshAmrita' 

[FairfieldLife] What Shiva Ma did wrong

2006-09-02 Thread TurquoiseB
Application Procedure for the Invicible America Course

1. When you walk in with your application, move 
immediately to the right.

2. Submit your application to the Course Nazi 
(http://members.aol.com/rynocub/soup.jpg), showing 
no enthusiasm at all.

3. Put your money on the counter and move to your left.

4. Take your acceptance and do not make any comments.

Otherwise, NO DOME BADGE FOR YOU!!!







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've had an active relationship with His Holiness for many many 
 years. 
 Is it out of the norm? Sure! Yes! Of course!
 Is it absolutely real? Sure! Yes! Of course!
 
 Should I deny it, or not speak about it, or doubt my direct 
 perception for the last 25 years, just because those who haven't had 
 such an experience cannot comprehend it, or doubt it?

The same question must have confronted Maharishi, when he was equally
inspired by visions of Guru Dev in 1955. With the slight difference,
that he had known him (and his vibe) in body, and was very well in a
position to judge the validity of his experience. Easy for anybody to
dismiss this, take an old lecture of GD out of context. Besides that,
we all know how often masters contradict themselves. Even Guru Dev
could have changed his mind, once he had left his brahmanical body and
his Shankaracharya position.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
Guru Dev repeatedly said that he was not forwarding his own beliefs, 
but those of the Shastras  that others should live by the Shastras, 
 not by their own initiative.





--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
wrote:
 
  I've had an active relationship with His Holiness for many many 
  years. 
  Is it out of the norm? Sure! Yes! Of course!
  Is it absolutely real? Sure! Yes! Of course!
  
  Should I deny it, or not speak about it, or doubt my direct 
  perception for the last 25 years, just because those who haven't 
had 
  such an experience cannot comprehend it, or doubt it?
 
 The same question must have confronted Maharishi, when he was 
equally
 inspired by visions of Guru Dev in 1955. With the slight difference,
 that he had known him (and his vibe) in body, and was very well in a
 position to judge the validity of his experience. Easy for anybody 
to
 dismiss this, take an old lecture of GD out of context. Besides 
that,
 we all know how often masters contradict themselves. Even Guru Dev
 could have changed his mind, once he had left his brahmanical body 
and
 his Shankaracharya position.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Guru Dev repeatedly said that he was not forwarding his own beliefs, 
 but those of the Shastras  that others should live by the Shastras, 
  not by their own initiative.

Yes, I believe so. But even the understanding of what the shastras are
saying can vary. The Shastras at places contradict themselves. As you
can see, there are even different practises in the Dasanami
Sampradaya, which was founded by Shankara. Shankara himself stated in
a famous poem, (not literally):
'He who knows this Brahman, he is my teacher, be he Brahmin or
Chandala.' This is also Shastra.

 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
 wrote:
  
   I've had an active relationship with His Holiness for many many 
   years. 
   Is it out of the norm? Sure! Yes! Of course!
   Is it absolutely real? Sure! Yes! Of course!
   
   Should I deny it, or not speak about it, or doubt my direct 
   perception for the last 25 years, just because those who haven't 
 had 
   such an experience cannot comprehend it, or doubt it?
  
  The same question must have confronted Maharishi, when he was 
 equally
  inspired by visions of Guru Dev in 1955. With the slight difference,
  that he had known him (and his vibe) in body, and was very well in a
  position to judge the validity of his experience. Easy for anybody 
 to
  dismiss this, take an old lecture of GD out of context. Besides 
 that,
  we all know how often masters contradict themselves. Even Guru Dev
  could have changed his mind, once he had left his brahmanical body 
 and
  his Shankaracharya position.
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
And that is a major role of the Guru to settle such disputes over the 
meaning of the Shastras and clarify about apparent contradictions. 
Which is why they are supposed to be so-o-o-o learned, AND be in the 
light entirely. 
Incidentally I am not presenting my own view on this, but that which 
I have learned from the words of Guru Dev.


 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
 wrote:
 
  Guru Dev repeatedly said that he was not forwarding his own 
beliefs, 
  but those of the Shastras  that others should live by the 
Shastras, 
   not by their own initiative.
 
 Yes, I believe so. But even the understanding of what the shastras 
are
 saying can vary. The Shastras at places contradict themselves. As 
you
 can see, there are even different practises in the Dasanami
 Sampradaya, which was founded by Shankara. Shankara himself stated 
in
 a famous poem, (not literally):
 'He who knows this Brahman, he is my teacher, be he Brahmin or
 Chandala.' This is also Shastra.
 
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
jflanegi@ 
  wrote:
   
I've had an active relationship with His Holiness for many 
many 
years. 
Is it out of the norm? Sure! Yes! Of course!
Is it absolutely real? Sure! Yes! Of course!

Should I deny it, or not speak about it, or doubt my direct 
perception for the last 25 years, just because those who 
haven't 
  had 
such an experience cannot comprehend it, or doubt it?
   
   The same question must have confronted Maharishi, when he was 
  equally
   inspired by visions of Guru Dev in 1955. With the slight 
difference,
   that he had known him (and his vibe) in body, and was very well 
in a
   position to judge the validity of his experience. Easy for 
anybody 
  to
   dismiss this, take an old lecture of GD out of context. Besides 
  that,
   we all know how often masters contradict themselves. Even Guru 
Dev
   could have changed his mind, once he had left his brahmanical 
body 
  and
   his Shankaracharya position.
  
 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ wrote:
 
  I've had an active relationship with His Holiness for many 
  many years. 
  Is it out of the norm? Sure! Yes! Of course!
  Is it absolutely real? Sure! Yes! Of course!
  
  Should I deny it, or not speak about it, or doubt my 
  direct perception for the last 25 years, just because 
  those who haven't had such an experience cannot 
  comprehend it, or doubt it?
 
 The same question must have confronted Maharishi, when he 
 was equally inspired by visions of Guru Dev in 1955. With 
 the slight difference, that he had known him (and his vibe) 
 in body, and was very well in a position to judge the 
 validity of his experience. Easy for anybody to dismiss 
 this, take an old lecture of GD out of context. Besides 
 that, we all know how often masters contradict themselves. 
 Even Guru Dev could have changed his mind, once he had 
 left his brahmanical body and his Shankaracharya position.

And besides that, :-) if I have such an experience 
and dismiss it because of something my teacher told 
me just doesn't happen in nature, I'm just a nobody. 
Whereas if I believe that what my teacher said was 
not true, and Just Another Guru Contradiction, I can 
believe in my experience, which allows me to be a lot 
more special than those who haven't had such an exper-
ience and cannot comprehend it.  

:-)

Just to clarify, I am *not* saying that everyone
who has ever had a visionary experience was deluding
themselves out of a desire to seem important and
special. But that *IS* true about many people, and
I think it's a good thing to keep in mind when
evaluating their claims. 

In almost every case, the claims themselves cannot
possibly be either verified or disproven. So my 
personal litmus test when dealing with such claims
(*especially* claims of communicating with the dead
teacher) is to watch the *overall* behavior of the 
person who is making the claim. 

Do they treat the experience they had matter-of-factly, 
as if it was no more important than any other experience 
they've had in their lives, or do they make it into A 
Really Big Thing, one that makes them unique and special? 
Do they use the experience itself as a mechanism for 
setting themselves up as some kind of expert or 
someone who is more capable of passing along the 
latest message from the dead teacher to others? Or
as the next great teacher themselves?

Just to clarify, I think Jim's handling his report-
ing of his own subjective experiences fairly well.
But I have seen other folks, in the Rama trip and
others, who *definitely* used their visions of the
now-dead teacher to set themselves up as the new
teacher, and to develop a fanatical following who
hovered around them waiting for the next message
from the teacher. And often to pay them a great
deal of money for delivering these messages.

It is this last phenomenon I expect to happen a LOT
in the TM movement when Maharishi finally dies. I
expect there to be at least half a dozen folks who
start hearing messages from Maharishi and that
mini-cults will develop around each of them. On the
one hand (as a sociological phenomenon) it'll be 
fun and fascinating to watch. On the other hand
(as an exercise in mind control and charlatanry) 
it's IMO likely to get really ugly.

Then again, maybe I'll be surprised and no one 
will start claiming to be in almost daily communi-
cation with Maharishi after he dies. 

Yeah, right...like *that's* gonna happen...  :-)










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread cardemaister

What is the longest time youse have stayed
/uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become easier
after a couple of weeks or so?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev behind my 
research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in the 
jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or puzzling over 
the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as far as I 
am concerned, I work on his behalf.





--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
wrote:
  
   I've had an active relationship with His Holiness for many 
   many years. 
   Is it out of the norm? Sure! Yes! Of course!
   Is it absolutely real? Sure! Yes! Of course!
   
   Should I deny it, or not speak about it, or doubt my 
   direct perception for the last 25 years, just because 
   those who haven't had such an experience cannot 
   comprehend it, or doubt it?
  
  The same question must have confronted Maharishi, when he 
  was equally inspired by visions of Guru Dev in 1955. With 
  the slight difference, that he had known him (and his vibe) 
  in body, and was very well in a position to judge the 
  validity of his experience. Easy for anybody to dismiss 
  this, take an old lecture of GD out of context. Besides 
  that, we all know how often masters contradict themselves. 
  Even Guru Dev could have changed his mind, once he had 
  left his brahmanical body and his Shankaracharya position.
 
 And besides that, :-) if I have such an experience 
 and dismiss it because of something my teacher told 
 me just doesn't happen in nature, I'm just a nobody. 
 Whereas if I believe that what my teacher said was 
 not true, and Just Another Guru Contradiction, I can 
 believe in my experience, which allows me to be a lot 
 more special than those who haven't had such an exper-
 ience and cannot comprehend it.  
 
 :-)
 
 Just to clarify, I am *not* saying that everyone
 who has ever had a visionary experience was deluding
 themselves out of a desire to seem important and
 special. But that *IS* true about many people, and
 I think it's a good thing to keep in mind when
 evaluating their claims. 
 
 In almost every case, the claims themselves cannot
 possibly be either verified or disproven. So my 
 personal litmus test when dealing with such claims
 (*especially* claims of communicating with the dead
 teacher) is to watch the *overall* behavior of the 
 person who is making the claim. 
 
 Do they treat the experience they had matter-of-factly, 
 as if it was no more important than any other experience 
 they've had in their lives, or do they make it into A 
 Really Big Thing, one that makes them unique and special? 
 Do they use the experience itself as a mechanism for 
 setting themselves up as some kind of expert or 
 someone who is more capable of passing along the 
 latest message from the dead teacher to others? Or
 as the next great teacher themselves?
 
 Just to clarify, I think Jim's handling his report-
 ing of his own subjective experiences fairly well.
 But I have seen other folks, in the Rama trip and
 others, who *definitely* used their visions of the
 now-dead teacher to set themselves up as the new
 teacher, and to develop a fanatical following who
 hovered around them waiting for the next message
 from the teacher. And often to pay them a great
 deal of money for delivering these messages.
 
 It is this last phenomenon I expect to happen a LOT
 in the TM movement when Maharishi finally dies. I
 expect there to be at least half a dozen folks who
 start hearing messages from Maharishi and that
 mini-cults will develop around each of them. On the
 one hand (as a sociological phenomenon) it'll be 
 fun and fascinating to watch. On the other hand
 (as an exercise in mind control and charlatanry) 
 it's IMO likely to get really ugly.
 
 Then again, maybe I'll be surprised and no one 
 will start claiming to be in almost daily communi-
 cation with Maharishi after he dies. 
 
 Yeah, right...like *that's* gonna happen...  :-)








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Ingegerd
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev behind 
my 
 research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in the 
 jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or puzzling 
over 
 the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
 I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as far as 
I 
 am concerned, I work on his behalf.

You are doing a great job. I have learned a lot from the quotations 
of Guru Dev.
Ingegerd 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin 
jflanegi@ 
 wrote:
   
I've had an active relationship with His Holiness for many 
many years. 
Is it out of the norm? Sure! Yes! Of course!
Is it absolutely real? Sure! Yes! Of course!

Should I deny it, or not speak about it, or doubt my 
direct perception for the last 25 years, just because 
those who haven't had such an experience cannot 
comprehend it, or doubt it?
   
   The same question must have confronted Maharishi, when he 
   was equally inspired by visions of Guru Dev in 1955. With 
   the slight difference, that he had known him (and his vibe) 
   in body, and was very well in a position to judge the 
   validity of his experience. Easy for anybody to dismiss 
   this, take an old lecture of GD out of context. Besides 
   that, we all know how often masters contradict themselves. 
   Even Guru Dev could have changed his mind, once he had 
   left his brahmanical body and his Shankaracharya position.
  
  And besides that, :-) if I have such an experience 
  and dismiss it because of something my teacher told 
  me just doesn't happen in nature, I'm just a nobody. 
  Whereas if I believe that what my teacher said was 
  not true, and Just Another Guru Contradiction, I can 
  believe in my experience, which allows me to be a lot 
  more special than those who haven't had such an exper-
  ience and cannot comprehend it.  
  
  :-)
  
  Just to clarify, I am *not* saying that everyone
  who has ever had a visionary experience was deluding
  themselves out of a desire to seem important and
  special. But that *IS* true about many people, and
  I think it's a good thing to keep in mind when
  evaluating their claims. 
  
  In almost every case, the claims themselves cannot
  possibly be either verified or disproven. So my 
  personal litmus test when dealing with such claims
  (*especially* claims of communicating with the dead
  teacher) is to watch the *overall* behavior of the 
  person who is making the claim. 
  
  Do they treat the experience they had matter-of-factly, 
  as if it was no more important than any other experience 
  they've had in their lives, or do they make it into A 
  Really Big Thing, one that makes them unique and special? 
  Do they use the experience itself as a mechanism for 
  setting themselves up as some kind of expert or 
  someone who is more capable of passing along the 
  latest message from the dead teacher to others? Or
  as the next great teacher themselves?
  
  Just to clarify, I think Jim's handling his report-
  ing of his own subjective experiences fairly well.
  But I have seen other folks, in the Rama trip and
  others, who *definitely* used their visions of the
  now-dead teacher to set themselves up as the new
  teacher, and to develop a fanatical following who
  hovered around them waiting for the next message
  from the teacher. And often to pay them a great
  deal of money for delivering these messages.
  
  It is this last phenomenon I expect to happen a LOT
  in the TM movement when Maharishi finally dies. I
  expect there to be at least half a dozen folks who
  start hearing messages from Maharishi and that
  mini-cults will develop around each of them. On the
  one hand (as a sociological phenomenon) it'll be 
  fun and fascinating to watch. On the other hand
  (as an exercise in mind control and charlatanry) 
  it's IMO likely to get really ugly.
  
  Then again, maybe I'll be surprised and no one 
  will start claiming to be in almost daily communi-
  cation with Maharishi after he dies. 
  
  Yeah, right...like *that's* gonna happen...  :-)
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
  Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
  deal in contradictions and have different answers
  to life's questions, depending on the state of
  attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 
  
  snicker
 
 cunt.

belly laugh

I'm a cunt?

What does that make Barry?

(HINT: The above is a quote from one of Barry's
attacks on me.  Only the name has been changed.)






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev behind my 
 research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in the 
 jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or puzzling over 
 the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
 I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as far as I 
 am concerned, I work on his behalf.

I'm sure it is. You are doing good work. You are on a mission from
God. ;-)





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 And that is a major role of the Guru to settle such disputes over the 
 meaning of the Shastras and clarify about apparent contradictions. 
 Which is why they are supposed to be so-o-o-o learned, AND be in the 
 light entirely. 
 Incidentally I am not presenting my own view on this, but that which 
 I have learned from the words of Guru Dev.

Then who is a Brahmana in Guru Devs words?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
   
   Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
   deal in contradictions and have different answers
   to life's questions, depending on the state of
   attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 
   
   snicker
  
  cunt.
 
 Now, now.  :-)
 
 Alice is just acting and thinking the way she's 
 been taught to act and think by her enlightened
 masters. Doncha know that intellectual consistency 
 is only a good thing when you can accuse someone
 of not having it.  :-)

Anyone who has ever thought Barry had something of
significance to say should contemplate the above
exchange.  The quote at the top is of one of Barry's
attacks on me, with only the name changed.  The
context of my quote was Barry's accusation that MMY
has contradicted himself about the survival of the
individual consciousness after death and the
prediction that TBs will overlook the contradiction
if they experience MMY after MMY dies.

(Barry, I'm sure, will be the first to acknowledge
that he has nothing of significance to say.  He's
been remarkably consistent about that whenever it's
been pointed out to him that what he says makes no
sense.  So perhaps we should all take that to
heart when reading Barry's posts here.)




 One can't believe impossible things.
 I daresay you haven't had much practice, said 
 the queen. When I was your age I always did it 
 for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I've 
 believed six impossible things before breakfast.
 
 -- Lewis Carroll







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
I anticipated the need to present Guru Dev's views on caste and soforth 
and I am right now working up a translation, should be ready in about 
half hour or so.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
 wrote:
 
  And that is a major role of the Guru to settle such disputes over 
the 
  meaning of the Shastras and clarify about apparent contradictions. 
  Which is why they are supposed to be so-o-o-o learned, AND be in 
the 
  light entirely. 
  Incidentally I am not presenting my own view on this, but that 
which 
  I have learned from the words of Guru Dev.
 
 Then who is a Brahmana in Guru Devs words?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In almost every case, the claims themselves cannot
 possibly be either verified or disproven. So my 
 personal litmus test when dealing with such claims
 (*especially* claims of communicating with the dead
 teacher) is to watch the *overall* behavior of the 
 person who is making the claim. 

Fair enough, thats what everybody should do. You can also see if what
he teaches has any positive effect on you. You can also observe, if
there is any 'transmission', e.g. when you do puja at initiation. It
will never be settled, and there will always be different opinions
about it, but in as far as I am concerned, this is the nature of all
religious experience. Some may connect to this particular stream of
experience, and some won't. 

 Do they treat the experience they had matter-of-factly, 
 as if it was no more important than any other experience 
 they've had in their lives, or do they make it into A 
 Really Big Thing, one that makes them unique and special? 

But, matter-of-factly, you can never make such a rule. Some experience
simply do have a bigger effect on your life than others. You should
know this. So why deny this and pretend it wasn't so?

snip

 But I have seen other folks, in the Rama trip and
 others, who *definitely* used their visions of the
 now-dead teacher to set themselves up as the new
 teacher, and to develop a fanatical following who
 hovered around them waiting for the next message
 from the teacher. And often to pay them a great
 deal of money for delivering these messages.

I know what you mean. This even happens with living teachers, who
don't talk a lot, or are fairly inaccessable. There are people who
channel e.g. Sai Baba. But these people have never been really close
to the teacher, they didn't live with him the everyday life.

 It is this last phenomenon I expect to happen a LOT
 in the TM movement when Maharishi finally dies. I
 expect there to be at least half a dozen folks who
 start hearing messages from Maharishi and that
 mini-cults will develop around each of them. 

I certainly believe things like this will happen, if they are not
already happening now. For me, I am personally not concerned, I am not
involved in TM, so why would I care? I know a lot of Gurus, who claim
to have been initiated by Babaji. I can only see them and see how I
feel in their vicinity. In the case of TM, if lets say, Nandikishore
would come forth and say he is in inner contact with Maharishi, I'm
more tempted to believe him, than say xyz-'nobody' - even though in
both cases I cannot know. As I see it now, the TM as a practise,
stands very much on its own feet, it doesn't need the authority of
Guru Dev, who is known to the people in the west only through
Maharishi. In the case of your ex-Guru Rama, people channeling him
were doing so on an established authority within the community, which
they were using to give messages. Maharishi OTOH didn't give messages
from Guru Dev to people. That's a big difference. He took GD's advice
for himself, and simply traces himself to the tradition of his master
whom he served for more than 13 years. Can you see the difference at all? 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The True Believer

2006-09-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Excerpts from The True Believer, by Eric Hoffer, 1952
 and other of his works. I'm posting them because they may 
 be helpful in understanding why so many TM True Believers 
 are so threatened by the existence of Fairfield Life and
 its credo (What is wanted is not the will to believe, 
 but the wish to find out, which is the exact opposite.) 
 Read through them and see if they don't remind you of
 a few people whose words you read here every week...

Barry is responding to this from me:

Anyone familiar with Hoffer's work knows that
his 'True Believer' label is *ludicrously*
inapplicable to most of those to whom Barry
attempts to apply it here.

Thanks to Barry for providing quotes from
Hoffer to document my assertion.





 
 
 
 
 The uncompromising attitude is more indicative of an 
 inner uncertainty than a deep conviction. The 
 implacable stand is directed more against the doubt 
 within than the assailant without.
 
 
 
 A doctrine insulates the devout not only against the 
 realities around them but also against their own selves. 
 The fanatical believer is not conscious of his envy, 
 malice, pettiness and dishonesty. There is a wall of 
 words between his consciousness and his real self.
 
 
 
 Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an 
 empty life. Thus people haunted by the purposelessness 
 of their lives try to find a new content not only by 
 dedicating themselves to a holy cause but also by 
 nursing a fanatical grievance. A mass movement offers 
 them unlimited opportunities for both.
 
 
 
 The effectiveness of a doctrine does not come from 
 its meaning but from its certitude. No doctrine 
 however profound and sublime will be effective unless 
 it is presented as the embodiment of the one and only 
 truth. It must be the one word from which all things 
 are and all things speak. Crude absurdities, trivial 
 nonsense and sublime truths are equally potent in 
 readying people for self-sacrifice if they are 
 accepted as the sole, eternal truth.
 
 It is obvious, therefore, that in order to be effective 
 a doctrine must not be understood, but has to be 
 believed in. We can be absolutely certain only about 
 things we do not understand. A doctrine that is 
 understood is shorn of its strength. Once we understand 
 a thing, it is as if it had originated in us. And, 
 clearly, those who are asked to renounce the self and 
 sacrifice it cannot see eternal certitude in anything 
 that originates in that self. The fact that they 
 understand a thing fully impairs its validity and 
 certitude in their eyes.
 
 The devout are always urged to seek the absolute truth 
 with their hearts and not their minds. It is the heart 
 which is conscious of God, not the reason. [--Pascal]   
 Rudolph Hess, when swearing in the entire Nazi party in 
 1934, exhorted his hearers: Do not seek Adolph Hitler 
 with your brains; all of you will find him with the 
 strength of your hearts.
 ...
 If a doctrine is not unintelligible, it has to be vague; 
 and if neither unintelligible nor vague, it has to be 
 unverifiable. One has to get to heaven or the distant 
 future to determine the truth of an effective doctrine. 
 When some part of a doctrine is relatively simple, 
 there is a tendency among the faithful to complicate 
 it and obscure it. Simple words are made pregnant with 
 meaning and made to look like symbols in a secret 
 message. There is thus an illiterate air about the 
 most literate true believer. He seems to use words as 
 if he were ignorant of their true meaning. Hence, 
 too, his taste for quibbling, hairsplitting, and 
 scholastic tortuousness.
 
 
 
 To know a person's religion we need not listen to his 
 profession of faith but must find his brand of intolerance.
 
 
 
 The savior who wants to turn men into angels is as much a 
 hater of human nature as the totalitarian despot who wants 
 to turn them into puppets.
 
 
 
 The less justified a man is in claiming excellence for 
 his own self, the more ready he is to claim all 
 excellence for his nation, his religion, his race, 
 or his holy cause.
 
 
 
 Take away hatred from some people, and you have men 
 without faith.
 
 
 
 The opposite of the religious fanatic is not the 
 fanatical atheist but the gentle cynic who cares not 
 whether there is a god or not.
 
 
 
 The uncompromising 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev behind my 
 research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in the 
 jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or puzzling over 
 the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
 I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as far as I 
 am concerned, I work on his behalf.

Are you claiming that Guru Dev wants you to
denigrate Maharishi, Paul?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Dev on how / when to meditate

2006-09-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Excerpts of speech made by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (before he was
 known as such) in which he asked that Guru Dev's 'elevating 
 discourses may reach the masses in every nook and corner of our 
 country and abroad' 
 - for full text go to 
 http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/sources/text/Maheshspeech.htm

As Paul notes, MMY was speaking (to devout Hindus)
before he had conceived the idea of a nonsectarian
meditation technique for the masses.

Your oft-repeated insinuation that MMY was trying
to hide Guru Dev's teaching because it would reflect
poorly on himself still doesn't wash, Paul.

MMY has *always* taught the nonsectarian elements
of what Guru Dev taught.

What he *could not* do was to teach what Guru Dev
taught about meditation if he wanted TM to be
universally accepted, which is what I was pointing
out in the post you quote.  Nor could he even have
made it available, for the reasons I explained (and
which you have not challenged).

Can you find a recorded or transcribed talk of
Guru Dev--about meditation or anything else--that
has no sectarian elements, that would be 
universally acceptable, even to those who do not
believe in God?



 
 
 The Statement issued by: BAL BRAHMACHARI SHRI MAHESH JI.
 15th Oct., 1952
 
 'His aim of life, if the life of a realised soul can be said to 
 possess any such aim, is to broadcast the message of the Great 
Divine 
 light that he has himself realised, the Light that is the Soul of 
all 
 human beings. Having himself attained the pinnacle of Self 
 development, he aims at transforming the worldly minded people into 
 the Godly minded, and through his inner Divine touch to change the 
 materialistic hearts of iron into spiritual hearts of gold.'
 
 'Shri Shankaracharya Maharaj has clear insight into the mind and 
the 
 thoughts of the modern age. His teaching and commendments are based 
 on sound reasonings which are quite agreeable to any reasonable 
 thinker. He is a great critic of prejudices and narrowmindedness 
 arising out of irrational love of caste, creed, nationality or 
 any ism. His life is a living proof of the Truth of the Vedas and 
 Shastras. He has opened a new era of renaissance of True Religion. 
He 
 extends his recognition to anything that is good in any religion. 
He 
 is accessible to all. Everyone can enjoy and derive benefit from 
his 
 holy Darshan and elevating discourses.'
 
 'The great Saint of the Himalayas in coming in your midst and in 
the 
 fitness of the great occasion, I appeal to your good sense to 
extend 
 your valuable support so that his elevating discourses may reach 
the 
 masses in every nook and corner of our country and abroad.'
 
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
  
   Paul Mason wrote:
   
   Guru Dev - Shankaracharya Swami Brahmanand Saraswati gives a 
few 
   words about when and how to meditate.
   Translation by Paul Mason 31st August 2006
  
  Paul, just how far do you think MMY would have
  gotten in teaching people around the world to
  meditate if he had been teaching a la Guru Dev?
  
  Or, what do you think would have happened if MMY
  had taught as he did, and these instructions from
  Guru Dev had been translated and made available
  through the TMO?  How many TMers would have 
  decided they were going to try it Guru Dev's way,
  and what would have been the result?  Especially
  in the absence of Guru Dev's personal guidance?
  
  What was MMY going to say, No, no, don't do what
  Guru Dev instructed, do what I instruct?
  
  You keep suggesting that there's something 
  sinister about MMY not promoting Guru Dev's actual
  teaching, but that's one of the silliest criticisms
  I've encountered.
  
  MMY obviously *didn't have a choice* if he wanted
  TM to be universally accepted--or even to *work*,
  for that matter.  The context in which Guru Dev
  taught was just too different.
  
  I suppose MMY could have issued a carefully
  bowdlerized version of Guru Dev's lectures with
  all the sectarian Hinduism taken out.  What would
  you have thought of that?  What would have been
  left?  Would that have been true to Guru Dev's
  intent?
  
  If you want to bash MMY for going global with TM
  instead of staying back in India and teaching a
  few people exactly what Guru Dev taught, ishtas and
  all--or for teaching anything in the first place--
  fine.
  
  But if you don't disapprove of his wanting to
  make TM universal, you really don't have a leg to
  stand on in suggesting that he is dishonoring Guru
  Dev by not promoting his original teachings.  That
  just makes no sense at all.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:

[FairfieldLife] Re: The True Believer

2006-09-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Excerpts from The True Believer, by Eric Hoffer, 1952
  and other of his works. I'm posting them because they may 
  be helpful in understanding why so many TM True Believers 
  are so threatened by the existence of Fairfield Life and
  its credo (What is wanted is not the will to believe, 
  but the wish to find out, which is the exact opposite.) 
  Read through them and see if they don't remind you of
  a few people whose words you read here every week...

P.S.: The TBs who are threatened by FFL and its
credo and who do not wish to find out are very
unlikely to be among the regular participants here.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In the case of your ex-Guru Rama, people channeling him
 were doing so on an established authority within the 
 community, which they were using to give messages. 

Michael, you should stick to what you actually 
know something about. When you try to make things
up, they usually *sound* made up.  :-)

There IS no established authority within the
Rama community. He failed to leave one. He just
croaked himself and left nothing behind but a 
foundation to give away what was left of his 
money and a buncha students who didn't know
what to do next.

So anybody who felt like carrying on his work did
so on their own, without any kind of authority or
organization backing them whatsoever. Some did so 
cleanly in my opinion, limiting themselves to teaching 
the only thing they were qualified to teach, basic 
meditation, and doing so for free. 

A few others set themselves up as gurus, and some
of them claimed direct communication from Rama to
do so. Since there are suckers everywhere, a few of
those suckers fell for this routine for short periods 
of time. Now, a few years later, none of these poseurs 
have any followers left any more. It became evident 
very quickly that they couldn't walk their talk.

 Maharishi OTOH didn't give messages from 
 Guru Dev to people. That's a big difference. 

True.  

 He took GD's advice for himself...

Uh, excuse me...it seems to me that Maharishi did
the *opposite* of taking Guru Dev's advice. According
to witnesses, that advice, given directly to Maharishi
in public while Guru Dev was alive, was that he should
*not* teach. Yet within a few years of Guru Dev's death, 
there he was teaching. That doesn't strike me as 
following one's teacher's advice. 

 ...and simply traces himself to the tradition of his 
 master whom he served for more than 13 years. 

And within whose tradition he would never have been 
allowed to teach. Never.

 Can you see the difference at all?

Sure. Totally different situation in some ways, but
similar in other ways. Maharishi rode to short-lived
fame in India on the coattails of a famous teacher and
then later to short-lived fame in the West by riding 
on the coattails of some famous musicians. The Rama 
poseurs rode to even shorter-lived fame on the coattails 
of the teacher they worked with for a few years (in
some cases, longer than MMY spent with GD).

I'm really not making a case for Maharishi being as
much of a charlatan as some of these poseurs were. 
MMY accomplished a few good things in his time, and as 
far as I can tell, the poseurs didn't. But Maharishi
*did* get famous initially by riding on his teacher's 
coattails, and has consistently ever since tried to 
give the impression that he had Guru Dev's blessing 
to go into the teaching biz. As far as I can tell, 
this claim is not true. 

But all this is moot. Ya meet one of the people
making these kinds of claims, whether they are for 
real or simply spiritual poseurs, and ya makes yer 
decision whether to believe them or not. And then 
ya lives with it. No one on earth will ever be able 
to prove whether ya made a good decision or a bad 
one. My personal feeling is that the more one feels 
that they have to justify their decision to others,
the greater chance there is that it was a bad one.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 My personal feeling is that the more one feels 
 that they have to justify their decision to others,
 the greater chance there is that it was a bad one.

But heaven help you if you wonder aloud in
Barry's hearing whether this is why some people
who decided to quit TM subsequently hang out on
TM-related groups for over a decade relentlessly
putting down MMY and the TMO and TMers.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Guru Dev on varnas (castes)

2006-09-02 Thread Peter
Thank you paul. that is amazingly cool!

--- Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Guru Dev on Varnas (castes)
 
 http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/upadesh.htm#varnoM
 
 Guru Dev quotes from 'Bhaja Govindam' of which there
 is a recording of 
 Guru Dev singing:-

http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/sources/mp3s/Bhaja%20Govindam.mp3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Dev on how / when to meditate

2006-09-02 Thread curtisdeltablues
Great find Paul!  It also contains the first money shot for MMY.  We
can see where her perfected his formula.

'The great Saint of the Himalayas in coming in your midst and in the
fitness of the great occasion, I appeal to your good sense to extend
your valuable support so that his elevating discourses may reach the
masses in every nook and corner of our country and abroad.'





--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Excerpts of speech made by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi (before he was known 
 as such) in which he asked that Guru Dev's 'elevating discourses may 
 reach the masses in every nook and corner of our country and abroad' 
 - for full text go to 
 http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/sources/text/Maheshspeech.htm
 
 
 The Statement issued by: BAL BRAHMACHARI SHRI MAHESH JI.
 15th Oct., 1952
 
 'His aim of life, if the life of a realised soul can be said to 
 possess any such aim, is to broadcast the message of the Great Divine 
 light that he has himself realised, the Light that is the Soul of all 
 human beings. Having himself attained the pinnacle of Self 
 development, he aims at transforming the worldly minded people into 
 the Godly minded, and through his inner Divine touch to change the 
 materialistic hearts of iron into spiritual hearts of gold.'
 
 'Shri Shankaracharya Maharaj has clear insight into the mind and the 
 thoughts of the modern age. His teaching and commendments are based 
 on sound reasonings which are quite agreeable to any reasonable 
 thinker. He is a great critic of prejudices and narrowmindedness 
 arising out of irrational love of caste, creed, nationality or 
 any ism. His life is a living proof of the Truth of the Vedas and 
 Shastras. He has opened a new era of renaissance of True Religion. He 
 extends his recognition to anything that is good in any religion. He 
 is accessible to all. Everyone can enjoy and derive benefit from his 
 holy Darshan and elevating discourses.'
 
 'The great Saint of the Himalayas in coming in your midst and in the 
 fitness of the great occasion, I appeal to your good sense to extend 
 your valuable support so that his elevating discourses may reach the 
 masses in every nook and corner of our country and abroad.'
 
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
  
   Paul Mason wrote:
   
   Guru Dev - Shankaracharya Swami Brahmanand Saraswati gives a few 
   words about when and how to meditate.
   Translation by Paul Mason 31st August 2006
  
  Paul, just how far do you think MMY would have
  gotten in teaching people around the world to
  meditate if he had been teaching a la Guru Dev?
  
  Or, what do you think would have happened if MMY
  had taught as he did, and these instructions from
  Guru Dev had been translated and made available
  through the TMO?  How many TMers would have 
  decided they were going to try it Guru Dev's way,
  and what would have been the result?  Especially
  in the absence of Guru Dev's personal guidance?
  
  What was MMY going to say, No, no, don't do what
  Guru Dev instructed, do what I instruct?
  
  You keep suggesting that there's something 
  sinister about MMY not promoting Guru Dev's actual
  teaching, but that's one of the silliest criticisms
  I've encountered.
  
  MMY obviously *didn't have a choice* if he wanted
  TM to be universally accepted--or even to *work*,
  for that matter.  The context in which Guru Dev
  taught was just too different.
  
  I suppose MMY could have issued a carefully
  bowdlerized version of Guru Dev's lectures with
  all the sectarian Hinduism taken out.  What would
  you have thought of that?  What would have been
  left?  Would that have been true to Guru Dev's
  intent?
  
  If you want to bash MMY for going global with TM
  instead of staying back in India and teaching a
  few people exactly what Guru Dev taught, ishtas and
  all--or for teaching anything in the first place--
  fine.
  
  But if you don't disapprove of his wanting to
  make TM universal, you really don't have a leg to
  stand on in suggesting that he is dishonoring Guru
  Dev by not promoting his original teachings.  That
  just makes no sense at all.
  
  
  
   At daybreak and in the day do that fit puja and dhyaana etc, 
 but 
  at 
   night before sleeping you should certainly do 10-15 minutes of 
  japa 
   of the 'ishhTa mantra kaa japa' and 'dhyaana' of the 'ishhTa 
  muurti' 
   (desired form). From this 'upaasanaa' (sitting near / devout 
   meditation) quick advancement occurs.
   
   In darkness you should sit with eye closed and do japa of the 
  mantra, 
   and in the same way with eye closed you should do dhyana of the 
   ishhTa with the mind. Not on their whole body, you should look 
 on 
  the 
   foot or on the mouth area of the head, seeing the full of 
  compassion 
   of our favourite ishhTa, looking infused with tenderness. The 
  vision 
   of the 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:
   Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
   deal in contradictions and have different answers
   to life's questions, depending on the state of
   attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 
   
   snicker
  
  cunt.
 
 belly laugh
 
 I'm a cunt?
 
 What does that make Barry?



A brachyphallic gugusse.




 
 (HINT: The above is a quote from one of Barry's
 attacks on me.  Only the name has been changed.)







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak 
geezerfreak@
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:

Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
deal in contradictions and have different answers
to life's questions, depending on the state of
attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 

snicker
   
   cunt.
  
  Now, now.  :-)
  
  Alice is just acting and thinking the way she's 
  been taught to act and think by her enlightened
  masters. Doncha know that intellectual consistency 
  is only a good thing when you can accuse someone
  of not having it.  :-)
 
 Anyone who has ever thought Barry had something of
 significance to say should contemplate the above
 exchange.





Really?

You honestly desire that I take time out from my day to contemplate 
yet another silly episode from this 10-year-plus dispute you've been 
having with Barry?

I can forgive you for wasting your own time; I can't forgive you for 
wanting to waste my time.






  The quote at the top is of one of Barry's
 attacks on me, with only the name changed.  The
 context of my quote was Barry's accusation that MMY
 has contradicted himself about the survival of the
 individual consciousness after death and the
 prediction that TBs will overlook the contradiction
 if they experience MMY after MMY dies.
 
 (Barry, I'm sure, will be the first to acknowledge
 that he has nothing of significance to say.  He's
 been remarkably consistent about that whenever it's
 been pointed out to him that what he says makes no
 sense.  So perhaps we should all take that to
 heart when reading Barry's posts here.)
 
 
 
 
  One can't believe impossible things.
  I daresay you haven't had much practice, said 
  the queen. When I was your age I always did it 
  for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I've 
  believed six impossible things before breakfast.
  
  -- Lewis Carroll
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
 
  In the case of your ex-Guru Rama, people channeling him
  were doing so on an established authority within the 
  community, which they were using to give messages. 
 
 Michael, you should stick to what you actually 
 know something about. When you try to make things
 up, they usually *sound* made up.  :-)

And what if you try to read properly?

 There IS no established authority within the
 Rama community. 

Of course he himself was the authority. So, speaking on his behalf,
like most channelers do, they use the authority of the person they
channel. I guess there was not mach interest in these channelings
outside the Rama community, but the interest within that community was
due to the authority their master enjoyed.

In comparison to that:
1)MMY did not channel GD
2)GD was unknown in the west were MMY started to teach.

 He failed to leave one. He just
 croaked himself and left nothing behind but a 
 foundation to give away what was left of his 
 money and a buncha students who didn't know
 what to do next.
 
 So anybody who felt like carrying on his work did
 so on their own, without any kind of authority or
 organization backing them whatsoever. Some did so 
 cleanly in my opinion, limiting themselves to teaching 
 the only thing they were qualified to teach, basic 
 meditation, and doing so for free. 
 
 A few others set themselves up as gurus, and some
 of them claimed direct communication from Rama to
 do so. 

So they used Ramas authority within the community. They claimed it.


 Since there are suckers everywhere, a few of
 those suckers fell for this routine for short periods 
 of time. Now, a few years later, none of these poseurs 
 have any followers left any more. It became evident 
 very quickly that they couldn't walk their talk.
 
  Maharishi OTOH didn't give messages from 
  Guru Dev to people. That's a big difference. 
 
 True.  
 
  He took GD's advice for himself...
 
 Uh, excuse me...it seems to me that Maharishi did
 the *opposite* of taking Guru Dev's advice. According
 to witnesses, that advice, given directly to Maharishi
 in public while Guru Dev was alive, was that he should
 *not* teach. Yet within a few years of Guru Dev's death, 
 there he was teaching. That doesn't strike me as 
 following one's teacher's advice. 

I was talking about the advice of the vision. He took this advice for
himself and not for others. Its a big difference, if I get some
message, and take this vision relating to myself, or start channeling
messages to others what they should do. Big difference. In one case, I
trust in my own experience and act upon it. In the other case I impose
a foreign authorithy to others.

  ...and simply traces himself to the tradition of his 
  master whom he served for more than 13 years. 
 
 And within whose tradition he would never have been 
 allowed to teach. Never.

Sure, so far we understood. Nevertheless, he was an integral part in
it, because we have GD word, that non Brahmins could be disciples. And
 as I have pointed out before, the reason was all external,
ultra-orthodox convention. There were many Brahmins who believe that
these injunctions aren't truely 'vedic'. (and as far as I can tell,
you wouldn't really care). Point is, they weren't personal.

  Can you see the difference at all?
 
 Sure. Totally different situation in some ways, but
 similar in other ways. Maharishi rode to short-lived
 fame in India on the coattails of a famous teacher and
 then later to short-lived fame in the West by riding 
 on the coattails of some famous musicians. The Rama 
 poseurs rode to even shorter-lived fame on the coattails 
 of the teacher they worked with for a few years (in
 some cases, longer than MMY spent with GD).

Your interpretation. To me it seems he effected the life of many in a
positive way. He indeed made meditation a household word in the west.

 I'm really not making a case for Maharishi being as
 much of a charlatan as some of these poseurs were. 
 MMY accomplished a few good things in his time, and as 
 far as I can tell, the poseurs didn't. But Maharishi
 *did* get famous initially by riding on his teacher's 
 coattails, and has consistently ever since tried to 
 give the impression that he had Guru Dev's blessing 
 to go into the teaching biz. As far as I can tell, 
 this claim is not true. 

When he started in Kerala, he was surrounded by orthodox Brahmins, and
it seems he easily convinced them. He also easily convinced a few
Gurubhais, who incidently were also Brahmnins. That is, according to
GD, they were all eligable to teach.

 But all this is moot. Ya meet one of the people
 making these kinds of claims, whether they are for 
 real or simply spiritual poseurs, and ya makes yer 
 decision whether to believe them or not. And then 
 ya lives with it. No one on earth will ever be able 
 to prove whether ya made a 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak 
geezerfreak@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
  wrote:
Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
deal in contradictions and have different answers
to life's questions, depending on the state of
attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 

snicker
   
   cunt.
  
  belly laugh
  
  I'm a cunt?
  
  What does that make Barry?
 
 A brachyphallic gugusse.

A not-very-bright young man who trysts with priests??






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Dev on varnas (castes)

2006-09-02 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Guru Dev on Varnas (castes)
 
 http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/upadesh.htm#varnoM

Wherever happiness is to be, there nobody is brahmana, is not
kshatriya, is not vaishya, is not shudra. In Paramatma there is no
difference in anyone, the difference then is in business.

Okay, very nice quotes. In fact it says in quintessence, that the
important thing is mukti and not varna. But it does not define, who a
Brahmana is.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread curtisdeltablues
I honestly think celibacy is an unhealthy practice.  Use it or lose it
is the rule in biology.  Semen was considered magic in Vedic culture,
but MMY's belief that it get transmuted into soma is just
pre-scientific nonsense.  The body does not work that way.  On the
other hand, believing that you are losing magical energy by having sex
is a great way to insure that you will not have a fulfilling intimate
relationship with your partner.  Sex is not only natural, it is one of
the greatest communications you can have with someone you love.  

Believing that you should hold it back is a sad metaphor for holding
back your heart or other energy from the people you love in your life.
 Losing this misunderstanding about how my body worked was one of the
greatest benefits of my leaving MMY's belief system.  Sex is not a
loss of energy, or a lower use of your life force.

Even if you are not in love with someone, don't give up on sex.  As
the great sage Woody Alan said:  Sex without love is an empty,
meaningless experience.  But among empty, meaningless experiences, it
is one of the best!

As each cast member of Seinfield  on the famous Bramacharin episode 
said one by one: I'm out!



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 What is the longest time youse have stayed
 /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become easier
 after a couple of weeks or so?







--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 What is the longest time youse have stayed
 /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become easier
 after a couple of weeks or so?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Dev on varnas (castes)

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
Try the Shastras?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
 wrote:
 
  Guru Dev on Varnas (castes)
  
  http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/upadesh.htm#varnoM
 
 Wherever happiness is to be, there nobody is brahmana, is not
 kshatriya, is not vaishya, is not shudra. In Paramatma there is no
 difference in anyone, the difference then is in business.
 
 Okay, very nice quotes. In fact it says in quintessence, that the
 important thing is mukti and not varna. But it does not define, who a
 Brahmana is.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
abstaining from sex is a messy subject

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I honestly think celibacy is an unhealthy practice.  Use it or lose 
it
 is the rule in biology.  Semen was considered magic in Vedic 
culture,
 but MMY's belief that it get transmuted into soma is just
 pre-scientific nonsense.  The body does not work that way.  On the
 other hand, believing that you are losing magical energy by having 
sex
 is a great way to insure that you will not have a fulfilling 
intimate
 relationship with your partner.  Sex is not only natural, it is one 
of
 the greatest communications you can have with someone you love.  
 
 Believing that you should hold it back is a sad metaphor for holding
 back your heart or other energy from the people you love in your 
life.
  Losing this misunderstanding about how my body worked was one of 
the
 greatest benefits of my leaving MMY's belief system.  Sex is not a
 loss of energy, or a lower use of your life force.
 
 Even if you are not in love with someone, don't give up on sex.  As
 the great sage Woody Alan said:  Sex without love is an empty,
 meaningless experience.  But among empty, meaningless experiences, 
it
 is one of the best!
 
 As each cast member of Seinfield  on the famous Bramacharin episode 
 said one by one: I'm out!
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ 
wrote:
 
  
  What is the longest time youse have stayed
  /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become easier
  after a couple of weeks or so?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ 
wrote:
 
  
  What is the longest time youse have stayed
  /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become easier
  after a couple of weeks or so?
 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak 
 geezerfreak@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
  wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB 
no_reply@ 
   wrote:
 Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
 deal in contradictions and have different answers
 to life's questions, depending on the state of
 attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 
 
 snicker

cunt.
   
   belly laugh
   
   I'm a cunt?
   
   What does that make Barry?
  
  A brachyphallic gugusse.
 
 A not-very-bright young man who trysts with priests??



something like that...not that I feel that way about Barry but 
thought it a nice counterpoint to cunt.  Also, I just read it 
in Depraved and insulting English and wanted to try it out.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Dev on varnas (castes)

2006-09-02 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Try the Shastras?
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
  wrote:
  
   Guru Dev on Varnas (castes)
   
   http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/upadesh.htm#varnoM
  
  Wherever happiness is to be, there nobody is brahmana, is not
  kshatriya, is not vaishya, is not shudra. In Paramatma there is no
  difference in anyone, the difference then is in business.
  
  Okay, very nice quotes. In fact it says in quintessence, that the
  important thing is mukti and not varna. But it does not define, who a
  Brahmana is.

Like: The knower of Brahman is Brahman?
As I pointed out, Ganapathy Muni and Kapali Shastri think that the
Varna system was not hereditary. I pointed out some examples before in
the other thread. For example, in the Vedas their were brahmanas etc.
But the word used for them was not jati, which is caste in classical
Sanskrit. The Veda uses varna, which is the psychological flavour.
There is no indication at all in the Vedas, that it was hereditary.

My argument was that the scriptures contradict themselves. You said
that the guru clarifies. I asked you, were does GD define Brahmana.
Now you go back to scripture.

You say: Guru Dev just spoke shastra
I say: Shastra gives contradictory statements.
You say: GD clarifies
I ask: were he defines Brahmana
You say:Try Shastras






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I honestly think celibacy is an unhealthy practice.  Use it or 
lose it
 is the rule in biology.  Semen was considered magic in Vedic 
culture,
 but MMY's belief that it get transmuted into soma is just
 pre-scientific nonsense.  The body does not work that way.  On the
 other hand, believing that you are losing magical energy by having 
sex
 is a great way to insure that you will not have a fulfilling 
intimate
 relationship with your partner.  Sex is not only natural, it is 
one of
 the greatest communications you can have with someone you love.  
 
 Believing that you should hold it back is a sad metaphor for 
holding
 back your heart or other energy from the people you love in your 
life.
  Losing this misunderstanding about how my body worked was one of 
the
 greatest benefits of my leaving MMY's belief system.  Sex is not a
 loss of energy, or a lower use of your life force.
 
 Even if you are not in love with someone, don't give up on sex.  As
 the great sage Woody Alan said:  Sex without love is an empty,
 meaningless experience.  But among empty, meaningless experiences, 
it
 is one of the best!
 
 As each cast member of Seinfield  on the famous Bramacharin 
episode 
 said one by one: I'm out!






See? This is what happens when a man doesn't get married. The semen 
backs up into his brain. -- Judas to Jesus in The Last Temptation 
of Christ.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread nablus108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 What is the longest time youse have stayed
 /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become easier
 after a couple of weeks or so?

It took 2 years, in my life, my friend. But then all pictures where 
gone. It is not a easy matter.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
 
  
  What is the longest time youse have stayed
  /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become easier
  after a couple of weeks or so?
 
 It took 2 years, in my life, my friend. But then all pictures where 
 gone. It is not a easy matter.

There you have it, card. In as little as 
two years you can be as sane as Nablus. 

:-)








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Dev on varnas (castes)

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
'From learned men or mahatmas become compliant with the Veda 
Shastras, understanding the relationship of one's own duty [with the 
dharma of others]. If you do not automatically accept the Veda 
Shastra enquire from them [learned men or mahatmas] the way for 
yourself then right away they can sift [the scriptures].
- The neighbour puts the head in the drain -'
[Guru Dev quoted in 'Amrit Kana']

Please Michael, Don't try and raise an argument with me about caste 
system, it's pointless and leads nowhere.
 




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
 wrote:
 
  Try the Shastras?
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
premanandpaul@
   wrote:
   
Guru Dev on Varnas (castes)

http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/upadesh.htm#varnoM
   
   Wherever happiness is to be, there nobody is brahmana, is not
   kshatriya, is not vaishya, is not shudra. In Paramatma there is 
no
   difference in anyone, the difference then is in business.
   
   Okay, very nice quotes. In fact it says in quintessence, that 
the
   important thing is mukti and not varna. But it does not define, 
who a
   Brahmana is.
 
 Like: The knower of Brahman is Brahman?
 As I pointed out, Ganapathy Muni and Kapali Shastri think that the
 Varna system was not hereditary. I pointed out some examples before 
in
 the other thread. For example, in the Vedas their were brahmanas 
etc.
 But the word used for them was not jati, which is caste in classical
 Sanskrit. The Veda uses varna, which is the psychological flavour.
 There is no indication at all in the Vedas, that it was hereditary.
 
 My argument was that the scriptures contradict themselves. You said
 that the guru clarifies. I asked you, were does GD define Brahmana.
 Now you go back to scripture.
 
 You say: Guru Dev just spoke shastra
 I say: Shastra gives contradictory statements.
 You say: GD clarifies
 I ask: were he defines Brahmana
 You say:Try Shastras








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread t3rinity
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  
He took GD's advice for himself...
   
   Uh, excuse me...it seems to me that Maharishi did
   the *opposite* of taking Guru Dev's advice. According
   to witnesses, that advice, given directly to Maharishi
   in public while Guru Dev was alive, was that he should
   *not* teach. Yet within a few years of Guru Dev's death, 
   there he was teaching. That doesn't strike me as 
   following one's teacher's advice. 
  
  I was talking about the advice of the vision. 
 
 No, you are talking about the advice of the *supposed*
 vision. There has never been, nor will there ever be,
 any evidence that such a vision ever happened.
 
 I'm just making this point because you seem to believe
 that because you believe in this vision it's a done
 deal, and that it really happened. I make no such
 assumption. I spent 14 years in the TM movement with-
 out hearing *any* reference to such a vision before
 you wrote about it a couple of posts ago. 

Thats because you are basically dump.

  He took this advice for himself and not for others. 
 
 If it happened. Again, I've never heard such a story
 in all my years. If I had, unlike you I probably 
 wouldn't have believed it.
 
 Nitpick all you want about the so-called differences
 you perceive between one person claiming to have had
 a vision and another. Bottom line is that anyone can
 claim anything they bloody well want to about visions,
 and there is nothing that *anyone* can *ever* do to 
 prove them either true or false. It's ALL a matter of
 belief.
 
 In this particular case, you seem to have heard and
 chosen to believe a rumor THAT IS NOT EVEN MOVEMENT
 DOGMA. I never heard such a story, and I'd be willing
 to believe that many others here haven't, either.

See, I have friends in India, who visisted this couple MMY was staying
with, when he had the vision. In fact, he painted a picture of GD
after having the vision. MMY is shown in the history book with this
particular picture, its on page 53. That you didn't hear it is not my
fault. What I don't understand: Is there any injunction here on the
list, to only repeat movement dogma (PS caps are considered shouting
and impolite) 
 
 You did hear such a story, from somewhere, and because
 you're just a bowl of mush, bhakti-speaking, you chose
 to believe it. As I said, I probably wouldn't have.

I heard the story from a friend who visited this couple. Seems to
really upset you.

 snip
  When he [MMY] started in Kerala, he was surrounded by 
  orthodox Brahmins, and it seems he easily convinced them. 
 
 He convinced you, and all you did was hear a rumor
 that isn't even an established part of the TM teachings. :-)

So what?
 
 snip
  If there is anything like 'good' or 'bad' at all. My point is: its
  always a personal thing. Why bother about the personal decision of
  others, and try to convince them they were wrong, Barry?
 
 We've gone down this road before. I am NOT trying to
 convince you of anything. That's just how you *interpret*
 hearing ideas other than your own, as if the person who
 has those other ideas is trying to convince you of them.
 They're not. You're just being a paranoid cultist, 
 that's all. :-)

So, Barry, you are really a nice guy. Isn't this forum open to all for
public discussion? Yet you go out of your frame constantly. Saying:
'Fuck off and die' claiming this to be just a nice american idiom. And
then giving me additional advice, that you just wanted me to
contemplete inevitable death. OTOH you are so very concerned about the
threats of fundamentalists, whose threats should be taken seriously
and who are just 'scary'. Want a little advice from me: This is a real
good opportunity to contemplate inevitable death. 

And because I believe something a friend tells me from an eyewitness,
I am a cultist, and paranoid at that. Barry, go figure. Why is it that
one can talk nicely and politely with other people, but not with you?
And here you go again sending me forth. Hey, use a spam filter. To me
you come across very faint-hearted and intolerant. 

 I leave you to be paranoid all by yourself, and to 
 believe any rumors you hear. Go forth and multiply. :-)








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
 In this particular case, you seem to have heard and
 chosen to believe a rumor THAT IS NOT EVEN MOVEMENT
 DOGMA. I never heard such a story, and I'd be willing
 to believe that many others here haven't, either.

I can't remember where I heard it first, but it was
some time ago, and I've heard it a number of times
since.  It's been discussed on alt.m.t, for example.
It's certainly movement *mythology* if not movement
*dogma*.  It isn't exactly the sort of thing you'd
want to mention in an intro lecture, after all.

 snip
  When he [MMY] started in Kerala, he was surrounded by 
  orthodox Brahmins, and it seems he easily convinced them. 
 
 He convinced you, and all you did was hear a rumor
 that isn't even an established part of the TM teachings. :-)

Says Barry, wilfully missing Michael's point (i.e.,
that orthodox Brahmins would be in a pretty good
position to decide whether MMY was qualified to
teach by orthodox Brahmin standards).

 snip
  If there is anything like 'good' or 'bad' at all. My point is: its
  always a personal thing. Why bother about the personal decision of
  others, and try to convince them they were wrong, Barry?
 
 We've gone down this road before. I am NOT trying to
 convince you of anything. That's just how you *interpret*
 hearing ideas other than your own, as if the person who
 has those other ideas is trying to convince you of them.
 They're not. You're just being a paranoid cultist, 
 that's all. :-)

Your constant mantra that you're not trying to
convince anybody of anything, Barry, is a crock.
It's an excuse you haul out to get yourself off
the hook when somebody mounts a solid challenge
to whatever you're trying to convince them of.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread nablus108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
 premanandpaul@ wrote:
 
  Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev behind 
 my 
  research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in the 
  jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or puzzling 
 over 
  the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
  I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as far as 
 I 
  am concerned, I work on his behalf.

Care for some details on this ? Why do you, some stupid, greedy 
little fellow who is infamous for writing a redicelous biography of 
Maharishi, now sensing Guru Dev behind my research... ?

 Lot's was right in his insesitive wrath in your direction: You are 
the scambug of this earth; Paul Mason, what you are doing is simple 
and gross. 

Why Maharishi cut your scorpion-country off is getting more and more 
obvious with people like you on board.

Obviously, you will reap what you sow. As we all shall. But you, my 
friend; be prepared for some extras. 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
Does anyone have a copy of the photograph that t3rinity is referring 
to? It is to the left of MMY on page 53 of 'Thirty Years Around the 
World'. It looks like the photo that the puja portrait was painted 
from. An in-transit picture is at:-
http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/sources/text/GuidingLight.htm


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Vision of Guru Dev by MMY? Never heard it before today. 
 Never heard of him 'painting a picture' before, unless you mean 
 colouring a photograph which you mentioned over on the googlegroup 
 many many months back, as I recall.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ 
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:

  He took GD's advice for himself...
 
 Uh, excuse me...it seems to me that Maharishi did
 the *opposite* of taking Guru Dev's advice. According
 to witnesses, that advice, given directly to Maharishi
 in public while Guru Dev was alive, was that he should
 *not* teach. Yet within a few years of Guru Dev's death, 
 there he was teaching. That doesn't strike me as 
 following one's teacher's advice. 

I was talking about the advice of the vision. 
   
   No, you are talking about the advice of the *supposed*
   vision. There has never been, nor will there ever be,
   any evidence that such a vision ever happened.
   
   I'm just making this point because you seem to believe
   that because you believe in this vision it's a done
   deal, and that it really happened. I make no such
   assumption. I spent 14 years in the TM movement with-
   out hearing *any* reference to such a vision before
   you wrote about it a couple of posts ago. 
  
  Thats because you are basically dump.
  
He took this advice for himself and not for others. 
   
   If it happened. Again, I've never heard such a story
   in all my years. If I had, unlike you I probably 
   wouldn't have believed it.
   
   Nitpick all you want about the so-called differences
   you perceive between one person claiming to have had
   a vision and another. Bottom line is that anyone can
   claim anything they bloody well want to about visions,
   and there is nothing that *anyone* can *ever* do to 
   prove them either true or false. It's ALL a matter of
   belief.
   
   In this particular case, you seem to have heard and
   chosen to believe a rumor THAT IS NOT EVEN MOVEMENT
   DOGMA. I never heard such a story, and I'd be willing
   to believe that many others here haven't, either.
  
  See, I have friends in India, who visisted this couple MMY was 
 staying
  with, when he had the vision. In fact, he painted a picture of GD
  after having the vision. MMY is shown in the history book with 
this
  particular picture, its on page 53. That you didn't hear it is 
not 
 my
  fault. What I don't understand: Is there any injunction here on 
the
  list, to only repeat movement dogma (PS caps are considered 
shouting
  and impolite) 
   
   You did hear such a story, from somewhere, and because
   you're just a bowl of mush, bhakti-speaking, you chose
   to believe it. As I said, I probably wouldn't have.
  
  I heard the story from a friend who visited this couple. Seems to
  really upset you.
  
   snip
When he [MMY] started in Kerala, he was surrounded by 
orthodox Brahmins, and it seems he easily convinced them. 
   
   He convinced you, and all you did was hear a rumor
   that isn't even an established part of the TM teachings. :-)
  
  So what?
   
   snip
If there is anything like 'good' or 'bad' at all. My point 
is: 
 its
always a personal thing. Why bother about the personal 
decision 
 of
others, and try to convince them they were wrong, Barry?
   
   We've gone down this road before. I am NOT trying to
   convince you of anything. That's just how you *interpret*
   hearing ideas other than your own, as if the person who
   has those other ideas is trying to convince you of them.
   They're not. You're just being a paranoid cultist, 
   that's all. :-)
  
  So, Barry, you are really a nice guy. Isn't this forum open to 
all 
 for
  public discussion? Yet you go out of your frame constantly. 
Saying:
  'Fuck off and die' claiming this to be just a nice american 
idiom. 
 And
  then giving me additional advice, that you just wanted me to
  contemplete inevitable death. OTOH you are so very concerned 
about 
 the
  threats of fundamentalists, whose threats should be taken 
seriously
  and who are just 'scary'. Want a little advice from me: This is a 
 real
  good opportunity to contemplate inevitable death. 
  
  And because I believe something a friend tells me from an 
 eyewitness,
  I am a cultist, and paranoid at that. Barry, go figure. Why is it 
 that
  one can talk nicely and politely with 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
What bar are you propping up today?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
 marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
  premanandpaul@ wrote:
  
   Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev 
behind 
  my 
   research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in 
the 
   jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or 
puzzling 
  over 
   the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
   I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as far 
as 
  I 
   am concerned, I work on his behalf.
 
 Care for some details on this ? Why do you, some stupid, greedy 
 little fellow who is infamous for writing a redicelous biography 
of 
 Maharishi, now sensing Guru Dev behind my research... ?
 
  Lot's was right in his insesitive wrath in your direction: You are 
 the scambug of this earth; Paul Mason, what you are doing is simple 
 and gross. 
 
 Why Maharishi cut your scorpion-country off is getting more and 
more 
 obvious with people like you on board.
 
 Obviously, you will reap what you sow. As we all shall. But you, my 
 friend; be prepared for some extras.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread lurkernomore20002000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
  premanandpaul@ wrote:
  
   Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev 
behind 
  my 
   research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in 
the 
   jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or 
puzzling 
  over 
   the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
   I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as far 
as 
  I 
   am concerned, I work on his behalf.
 
 Care for some details on this ? Why do you, some stupid, greedy 
 little fellow who is infamous for writing a redicelous biography 
of 
 Maharishi, now sensing Guru Dev behind my research... ?
 
snip

Now we're heating up here!

lurk








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread geezerfreak
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
   
   Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
   deal in contradictions and have different answers
   to life's questions, depending on the state of
   attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 
   
   snicker
  
  cunt.
 
 Now, now.  :-)
 
 Alice is just acting and thinking the way she's 
 been taught to act and think by her enlightened
 masters. Doncha know that intellectual consistency 
 is only a good thing when you can accuse someone
 of not having it.  :-)
 

I know, but MMY always taught me to speak the sweet truth!





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Scambug and fault apple?

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
Know yourself.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread nablus108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 What bar are you propping up today?

I'm just having a peek into your future my friend. It's spontanous, 
can't help it. Amend your ways. Why create more karma than necessary. 
We should long for the opposite.

 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 nablus108@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
  marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
   premanandpaul@ wrote:
   
Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev 
 behind 
   my 
research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in 
 the 
jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or 
 puzzling 
   over 
the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as 
far 
 as 
   I 
am concerned, I work on his behalf.
  
  Care for some details on this ? Why do you, some stupid, greedy 
  little fellow who is infamous for writing a 
redicelous biography 
 of 
  Maharishi, now sensing Guru Dev behind my research... ?
  
   Lot's was right in his insesitive wrath in your direction: You 
are 
  the scambug of this earth; Paul Mason, what you are doing is 
simple 
  and gross. 
  
  Why Maharishi cut your scorpion-country off is getting more and 
 more 
  obvious with people like you on board.
  
  Obviously, you will reap what you sow. As we all shall. But you, 
my 
  friend; be prepared for some extras.
 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Never thought I would see this.

2006-09-02 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Never thought I would see this.





on 9/1/06 8:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

End of an Affair http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/31/AR2006083101460_pf.html 
 
 
FOCUS | Larry C. Johnson: Smearing the Wilsons and Sliming America
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/090206Y.shtml
How low can they go? I refer of course to the latest vitriol directed at Valerie and Joe Wilson by the likes of Christopher Hitchens and Fred Hiatt of the Washington Post, who claim that Joe Wilson, not Bush administration officials, is responsible for destroying his wife's cover and exposing her as a CIA operative. Hitchens's battle with the bottle may account for his addled thinking, but what is Hiatt's excuse? asks Larry C. Johnson.


__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

   Why Maharishi cut your scorpion-country off is getting more and 
  more 
   obvious with people like you on board.
   
   Obviously, you will reap what you sow. As we all shall. But 
you, 
  my 
   friend; be prepared for some extras.
  
  
  
  Okay.
  
  I'm now fully convinced that this Nablus fellow is a troll.
  
  He's not even a meditator but someone who is out to discredit 
the 
  TMO and MMY by acting like a complete horse's ass.  He sounds 
more 
  like a fundamentalist Christian with all this fire and 
brimstone.  
  Perhaps he is Peter from a.m.t.
 
 Funny. 
 Your problem is that you are not understanding what I write.



I think I understand fear-mongering.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread geezerfreak
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Why Maharishi cut your scorpion-country off is getting more and 
  more 
   obvious with people like you on board.
   
   Obviously, you will reap what you sow. As we all shall. But you, 
  my 
   friend; be prepared for some extras.
  
  
  
  Okay.
  
  I'm now fully convinced that this Nablus fellow is a troll.
  
  He's not even a meditator but someone who is out to discredit the 
  TMO and MMY by acting like a complete horse's ass.  He sounds more 
  like a fundamentalist Christian with all this fire and brimstone.  
  Perhaps he is Peter from a.m.t.
 
 Funny. 
 Your problem is that you are not understanding what I write.

Nablus, I just finished a rockin' stellar program of 4 hours. You
wouldn't believe what happened at the end. I was running through the
sutras when all of a sudden I cognized your future! My friend, I have
some dark news for you. Don't buy any long playing records. Your
remaining time on this earth is very short. But cheer up! You will be
reborn in England to live a brief life as a chimney sweep.Onward and
upward, eh? Stiff upper lip old chap!






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Peter


--- nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  What bar are you propping up today?
 
 I'm just having a peek into your future my friend.
 It's spontanous, 
 can't help it. Amend your ways. Why create more
 karma than necessary. 
 We should long for the opposite.

I am so impressed with your psychic ability and how
special you are. I'm glad to be able to talk to you.
I'm blessed.

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread Peter
I'm with you on this one, Curtis. If celibacy comes
naturally, with no thought or strain, then fine. But
most people need to have sex and guess what, it has no
impact on your evolution at all. People can be so
unsimple and so un-natural in the TMO.   

--- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 I honestly think celibacy is an unhealthy practice. 
 Use it or lose it
 is the rule in biology.  Semen was considered magic
 in Vedic culture,
 but MMY's belief that it get transmuted into soma is
 just
 pre-scientific nonsense.  The body does not work
 that way.  On the
 other hand, believing that you are losing magical
 energy by having sex
 is a great way to insure that you will not have a
 fulfilling intimate
 relationship with your partner.  Sex is not only
 natural, it is one of
 the greatest communications you can have with
 someone you love.  
 
 Believing that you should hold it back is a sad
 metaphor for holding
 back your heart or other energy from the people you
 love in your life.
  Losing this misunderstanding about how my body
 worked was one of the
 greatest benefits of my leaving MMY's belief system.
  Sex is not a
 loss of energy, or a lower use of your life force.
 
 Even if you are not in love with someone, don't give
 up on sex.  As
 the great sage Woody Alan said:  Sex without love
 is an empty,
 meaningless experience.  But among empty,
 meaningless experiences, it
 is one of the best!
 
 As each cast member of Seinfield  on the famous
 Bramacharin episode 
 said one by one: I'm out!
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  What is the longest time youse have stayed
  /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become
 easier
  after a couple of weeks or so?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  What is the longest time youse have stayed
  /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become
 easier
  after a couple of weeks or so?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
Isn't the puja painting by Acharya. Clearly, Raj Varma painted 
portraits of Guru Dev, but I'm not sure which. I wrote to him back in 
the 1970's and asked him for any photos of Guru Dev that he had 
taken. He sent me about half a dozen which alas are no longer 
accessible, but hopefully, they will resurface somewhere one of these 
days.




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 jyouells@ 
 wrote:
 
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
premanandpaul@
  wrote:
  
   Does anyone have a copy of the photograph that t3rinity is 
 referring
   to? It is to the left of MMY on page 53 of 'Thirty Years Around 
 the
   World'. It looks like the photo that the puja portrait was 
 painted
   from. An in-transit picture is at:-
   http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/sources/text/GuidingLight.htm
  
  I thought that the puju portrait  was painted  by  Dr. Varma , 
  Maharishi's  uncle.
  
  JohnY
 
 That is what I read. I thing it was said in book of Else Denmark?? 
 She was in Rishikesh when Dr. Varma was working with the picture. 
 Unfortunately, I have given away almost all books of MMY - so I am 
 not able to control it.
 Ingegerd 
  
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason
   premanandpaul@ wrote:
   
Vision of Guru Dev by MMY? Never heard it before today.
Never heard of him 'painting a picture' before, unless you 
mean
colouring a photograph which you mentioned over on the 
 googlegroup
many many months back, as I recall.
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ 
 wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
   wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@
   wrote:
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB 
 no_reply@
wrote:
   
 He took GD's advice for himself...
   
Uh, excuse me...it seems to me that Maharishi did
the *opposite* of taking Guru Dev's advice. According
to witnesses, that advice, given directly to Maharishi
in public while Guru Dev was alive, was that he should
*not* teach. Yet within a few years of Guru Dev's 
 death,
there he was teaching. That doesn't strike me as
following one's teacher's advice.
  
   I was talking about the advice of the vision.
 
  No, you are talking about the advice of the *supposed*
  vision. There has never been, nor will there ever be,
  any evidence that such a vision ever happened.
 
  I'm just making this point because you seem to believe
  that because you believe in this vision it's a done
  deal, and that it really happened. I make no such
  assumption. I spent 14 years in the TM movement with-
  out hearing *any* reference to such a vision before
  you wrote about it a couple of posts ago.

 Thats because you are basically dump.

   He took this advice for himself and not for others.
 
  If it happened. Again, I've never heard such a story
  in all my years. If I had, unlike you I probably
  wouldn't have believed it.
 
  Nitpick all you want about the so-called differences
  you perceive between one person claiming to have had
  a vision and another. Bottom line is that anyone can
  claim anything they bloody well want to about visions,
  and there is nothing that *anyone* can *ever* do to
  prove them either true or false. It's ALL a matter of
  belief.
 
  In this particular case, you seem to have heard and
  chosen to believe a rumor THAT IS NOT EVEN MOVEMENT
  DOGMA. I never heard such a story, and I'd be willing
  to believe that many others here haven't, either.

 See, I have friends in India, who visisted this couple MMY 
 was
staying
 with, when he had the vision. In fact, he painted a picture 
 of GD
 after having the vision. MMY is shown in the history book 
 with
   this
 particular picture, its on page 53. That you didn't hear it 
 is
   not
my
 fault. What I don't understand: Is there any injunction 
here 
 on
   the
 list, to only repeat movement dogma (PS caps are considered
   shouting
 and impolite)

  You did hear such a story, from somewhere, and because
  you're just a bowl of mush, bhakti-speaking, you chose
  to believe it. As I said, I probably wouldn't have.

 I heard the story from a friend who visited this couple. 
 Seems to
 really upset you.

  snip
   When he [MMY] started in Kerala, he was surrounded by
   orthodox Brahmins, and it seems he easily convinced 
them.
 
  He convinced you, and all you did was hear a rumor
  that isn't even an established part of the TM 
teachings. :-
 )

 So what?
 
  snip
   If there is anything like 'good' or 'bad' at all. My 
 point
   is:

[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Marek Reavis
Comment below:
**

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jyouells2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
 wrote:
 
  Does anyone have a copy of the photograph that t3rinity is referring
  to? It is to the left of MMY on page 53 of 'Thirty Years Around the
  World'. It looks like the photo that the puja portrait was painted
  from. An in-transit picture is at:-
  http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/sources/text/GuidingLight.htm
 
 I thought that the puju portrait  was painted  by  Dr. Varma , 
 Maharishi's  uncle.
 
 JohnY
 
**Snip to End**

The portrait of Guru Dev that we received as initiators was signed by
M.T.V. Acharya.  I had always heard Dr. Varma referred to as Raj
Varma, which I assumed was his name but could be just an honorific. 
So, depending on what Dr. Varma's name was, M.T.V. Acharya could be
him and then Acharya would be a designation that he was at a high
level of achievement as an artist.

However, I don't believe that's the case at all, inasmuch as the
styles between this portrait and all of Dr. Varma's other portraits
are so radically different.  Dr. Varma was a self-taught artist and
all his paintings show elements characteristic of the auto-didact:
problems with perspective, irregularities of scale, confusions between
color and value, etc.  The portrait we received for puja is a painting
on top of a photo of Guru Dev (the same photo which can be found at
Paul Mason's site, near the bottom of the opening page, among the
quotes and reproduced in blue) and it seems that there are several
different, earlier versions before the one we were given.  

This photo image of Guru Dev is likely the one that Maharishi used to
color in when he was first heading south and began to teach.  Since
Dr. Varma was a photographer and photo retoucher, it's not unlikely
that Maharishi would have had familiarity with and access to the photo
retouching inks that he used in his profession.

All of Dr. Varma's paintings of Guru Dev also utilize the same 3/4
pose of Guru Dev's body from that same photo; only in Dr. Varma's
official portraits of Guru Dev on the lion throne he positions the
head of Guru Dev so that it's a full frontal.  An interesting (and not
ineffective) technique but also very typical of what you'd expect of a
self-taught artist.  In the later years when Dr. Varma was just
churning these paintings out they began to look quite grotesque with
the head of Guru Dev becoming quite large relative to the body's
proportions and sort of sinking down into the body so that the image
had a kind of hunchbacked effect.  Very much different from the erect,
yet comfortable posture that Guru Dev always seems to abide in as
shown in all the photos we have so far.

Before I sent this I looked for and found a photo of a portrait of
Maharishi painted by Dr. Varma sometime in the 80's.  In the lower
right hand corner of the image he has signed it Raj R.P. Varma.  So
that seems to conclusively prove that he didn't do the standard puja
portrait.  I'll upload a copy of that image to the files later.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 I'm with you on this one, Curtis. If celibacy comes
 naturally, with no thought or strain, then fine. But
 most people need to have sex and guess what, it has no
 impact on your evolution at all. People can be so
 unsimple and so un-natural in the TMO.   
 



On the one hand, I've had the best subjective experiences in TM 
during times of celibacy.

On the other, living in a society where every billboard around every 
corner is enticing you to schwing! if you get my drift, celibacy 
can be excruciatingly frustrating and, yes, dangerous to your health.

I think if one is in a monastery or a surroundings that is protected 
from the influences of society then, yes, celibacy is a worthy ideal 
to aspire to.

Otherwise, you're on a really hard and unpleasant road...





 --- curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  I honestly think celibacy is an unhealthy practice. 
  Use it or lose it
  is the rule in biology.  Semen was considered magic
  in Vedic culture,
  but MMY's belief that it get transmuted into soma is
  just
  pre-scientific nonsense.  The body does not work
  that way.  On the
  other hand, believing that you are losing magical
  energy by having sex
  is a great way to insure that you will not have a
  fulfilling intimate
  relationship with your partner.  Sex is not only
  natural, it is one of
  the greatest communications you can have with
  someone you love.  
  
  Believing that you should hold it back is a sad
  metaphor for holding
  back your heart or other energy from the people you
  love in your life.
   Losing this misunderstanding about how my body
  worked was one of the
  greatest benefits of my leaving MMY's belief system.
   Sex is not a
  loss of energy, or a lower use of your life force.
  
  Even if you are not in love with someone, don't give
  up on sex.  As
  the great sage Woody Alan said:  Sex without love
  is an empty,
  meaningless experience.  But among empty,
  meaningless experiences, it
  is one of the best!
  
  As each cast member of Seinfield  on the famous
  Bramacharin episode 
  said one by one: I'm out!
  
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister
  no_reply@ wrote:
  
   
   What is the longest time youse have stayed
   /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become
  easier
   after a couple of weeks or so?
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister
  no_reply@ wrote:
  
   
   What is the longest time youse have stayed
   /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become
  easier
   after a couple of weeks or so?
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  To subscribe, send a message to:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Or go to: 
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
  and click 'Join This Group!' 
  Yahoo! Groups Links
  
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   
  
  
  
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
 http://mail.yahoo.com








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Ingegerd
I have some notes from 9th February 1970, where MMY talks about the 
start of SRM, the notes is written from a Audio Tape:
When Guru Dev left his body I retired to the Himalayas where Guru 
Dev had met his Guru Dev. I felt I should go to Ramesh Waroom - I 
asked the saints. One was 90 years old. This was for me, after the 
Himalayas like stepping into mud. He advised against going. I 
decided to forget the trip. I went to Kungakumari - I had a divine 
revalation. I left and went to Tivendrum, to the biggest temple. I 
was followed by a man and he asked me to speak about the Himalayas - 
he arranged a 7 day lecture program and he supplied the topics. In 6 
months I was lecturing in Dehli. At this stage I had never initiated 
anyone. When I got to Hardwar the philosophy had become clear - to 
turn the mind inward was easy! The message was readily accepted. I 
went to Kashmir and then to Bombay for the 89th birthday 
celebrations for Guru Dev. I held a 3 day seminar in Madras on 
saintly luminaries. At the end I said I think this meditation can 
spiritually regenerate the world. During the applause I felt I 
should start a world movement. I announced it spontaneously. After a 
6 months tour of south India I calculated at this rate it would take 
200 years..
Ingegerd

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Vision of Guru Dev by MMY? Never heard it before today. 
 Never heard of him 'painting a picture' before, unless you mean 
 colouring a photograph which you mentioned over on the googlegroup 
 many many months back, as I recall.
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ 
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:

  He took GD's advice for himself...
 
 Uh, excuse me...it seems to me that Maharishi did
 the *opposite* of taking Guru Dev's advice. According
 to witnesses, that advice, given directly to Maharishi
 in public while Guru Dev was alive, was that he should
 *not* teach. Yet within a few years of Guru Dev's death, 
 there he was teaching. That doesn't strike me as 
 following one's teacher's advice. 

I was talking about the advice of the vision. 
   
   No, you are talking about the advice of the *supposed*
   vision. There has never been, nor will there ever be,
   any evidence that such a vision ever happened.
   
   I'm just making this point because you seem to believe
   that because you believe in this vision it's a done
   deal, and that it really happened. I make no such
   assumption. I spent 14 years in the TM movement with-
   out hearing *any* reference to such a vision before
   you wrote about it a couple of posts ago. 
  
  Thats because you are basically dump.
  
He took this advice for himself and not for others. 
   
   If it happened. Again, I've never heard such a story
   in all my years. If I had, unlike you I probably 
   wouldn't have believed it.
   
   Nitpick all you want about the so-called differences
   you perceive between one person claiming to have had
   a vision and another. Bottom line is that anyone can
   claim anything they bloody well want to about visions,
   and there is nothing that *anyone* can *ever* do to 
   prove them either true or false. It's ALL a matter of
   belief.
   
   In this particular case, you seem to have heard and
   chosen to believe a rumor THAT IS NOT EVEN MOVEMENT
   DOGMA. I never heard such a story, and I'd be willing
   to believe that many others here haven't, either.
  
  See, I have friends in India, who visisted this couple MMY was 
 staying
  with, when he had the vision. In fact, he painted a picture of GD
  after having the vision. MMY is shown in the history book with 
this
  particular picture, its on page 53. That you didn't hear it is 
not 
 my
  fault. What I don't understand: Is there any injunction here on 
the
  list, to only repeat movement dogma (PS caps are considered 
shouting
  and impolite) 
   
   You did hear such a story, from somewhere, and because
   you're just a bowl of mush, bhakti-speaking, you chose
   to believe it. As I said, I probably wouldn't have.
  
  I heard the story from a friend who visited this couple. Seems to
  really upset you.
  
   snip
When he [MMY] started in Kerala, he was surrounded by 
orthodox Brahmins, and it seems he easily convinced them. 
   
   He convinced you, and all you did was hear a rumor
   that isn't even an established part of the TM teachings. :-)
  
  So what?
   
   snip
If there is anything like 'good' or 'bad' at all. My point 
is: 
 its
always a personal thing. Why bother about the personal 
decision 
 of
others, and try to convince them they were wrong, Barry?
   
   We've gone down this road before. I am NOT trying to
   convince you of 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 I'm with you on this one, Curtis. If celibacy comes
 naturally, with no thought or strain, then fine. But
 most people need to have sex and guess what, it has no
 impact on your evolution at all. People can be so
 unsimple and so un-natural in the TMO. 

In my case that's a bit more complicated, so much so,
that it feels quite frustrating to try to explain it
in a foreign language. But I'd say it boils down
to the fact that I'm a gynephobic heterosexual.
Only recently I've realised the possible cause
for my gynephobia in case the cause is something that's happened
during this lifetime. The last time I was with
a women, I noticed she was not at all satisfied with 
my performance. I guess she could feel my tenseness 
or something. So, in my case staying /uurdhva-retas/ is
not loosing much of intimacy.
Anyhow, the main reason why I asked that was the fact
 that nowadays I often feel rather restless
if I keep it up more than, say, 2 weeks, whereas when
I was in my twenties, before I was initiated,
I seem to recall that I could once
do that for several weeks without feeling overly uneasy. On the
other hand brahmacarya seems to have some physical and
mental benefits, the weirdest of which is that the muscles
in my legs seem to, well, grow somewhat. That's important
for me because I'm rather self-conscious of not having that
much muscles overall, except for the love-muscle the size
of which I'm fairly satisfied with. -- Yikes!  :)
I'm not intending to try to become /uurdhva-retas/ for
an extended time, but perhaps a month, or so, at a time would
be reasonable.



  






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] 'News Organizations Helping To Fuel Chaos Terror'

2006-09-02 Thread Robert Gimbel



Many [if not all] ofthe news organizations;  Especially, here, in the United States;  Have been complicit in their propagating fear and terror.  They were absolutely complicit in the unquestioning build-up-  To the Iraqi Invasion...  They continue to fear monger every stupid utterance of every terror leader.  They blow out of proportion, every obtuseincident, for ratings and sick entertainment value.  I say most, if not all, of the news organizations in the United States.Areresponsible for creating and propagating the fear mongering;  That they ultimately blame on the current administation.   __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___



[FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread curtisdeltablues
Kind of amazing how personal some posts are.  I appreciate your
openness.  I learned a new word today: gynophobic, fear of or
contempt for women!  Subtly different from misogyny hatred, dislike,
or mistrust of women, which is another word for this common attitude
in some men in certain spiritual groups.  Shankara seemed to be both
according to his writings. 

One thing I notice is that actually having sex frees up my mind to
think of other things.   An inactive sex life can lead to and annoying
focus of my attention. Have you ever tried the opposite of celibacy
for a month, a daily practice?  It might change your mind about the
value of celibacy.  Your body gets very strong and healthy. Puts a
grin on your face and a spring in your step for the whole day!




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ 
 wrote:
 
  I'm with you on this one, Curtis. If celibacy comes
  naturally, with no thought or strain, then fine. But
  most people need to have sex and guess what, it has no
  impact on your evolution at all. People can be so
  unsimple and so un-natural in the TMO. 
 
 In my case that's a bit more complicated, so much so,
 that it feels quite frustrating to try to explain it
 in a foreign language. But I'd say it boils down
 to the fact that I'm a gynephobic heterosexual.
 Only recently I've realised the possible cause
 for my gynephobia in case the cause is something that's happened
 during this lifetime. The last time I was with
 a women, I noticed she was not at all satisfied with 
 my performance. I guess she could feel my tenseness 
 or something. So, in my case staying /uurdhva-retas/ is
 not loosing much of intimacy.
 Anyhow, the main reason why I asked that was the fact
  that nowadays I often feel rather restless
 if I keep it up more than, say, 2 weeks, whereas when
 I was in my twenties, before I was initiated,
 I seem to recall that I could once
 do that for several weeks without feeling overly uneasy. On the
 other hand brahmacarya seems to have some physical and
 mental benefits, the weirdest of which is that the muscles
 in my legs seem to, well, grow somewhat. That's important
 for me because I'm rather self-conscious of not having that
 much muscles overall, except for the love-muscle the size
 of which I'm fairly satisfied with. -- Yikes!  :)
 I'm not intending to try to become /uurdhva-retas/ for
 an extended time, but perhaps a month, or so, at a time would
 be reasonable.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 'News Organizations Helping To Fuel Chaos Terror'

2006-09-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Many [if not all] of the news organizations;
   Especially, here,  in the United States;
   Have been complicit in their propagating fear and terror.
   They were absolutely complicit in the unquestioning build-up-
   To the Iraqi Invasion...
   They continue to fear monger every stupid utterance of every terror 
leader.
   They blow out of proportion, every obtuse incident, for ratings and 
sick entertainment value.
   I say  most, if not all, of the news organizations in the United 
States.
 Are responsible for creating and propagating the fear mongering;
   That they ultimately blame on the current administation.

Uh, Robert, where do you think they're getting
their ideas and information?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 'News Organizations Helping To Fuel Chaos Terror'

2006-09-02 Thread Robert Gimbel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@ 
 wrote:
 
  Many [if not all] of the news organizations;
Especially, here,  in the United States;
Have been complicit in their propagating fear and terror.
They were absolutely complicit in the unquestioning build-up-
To the Iraqi Invasion...
They continue to fear monger every stupid utterance of every 
terror 
 leader.
They blow out of proportion, every obtuse incident, for ratings 
and 
 sick entertainment value.
I say  most, if not all, of the news organizations in the 
United 
 States.
  Are responsible for creating and propagating the fear 
mongering;
That they ultimately blame on the current administation.
 
 Uh, Robert, where do you think they're getting
 their ideas and information?

Yeah, I know; but I just wanted to write something in a way;
That is so obvious, and send it out to some of these [news 
organizations]...(kind of a hobby of mine).
That would, sort of, state the obvious, which sometimes, I think, can 
allow people to perhaps take a chance and write something different 
than the usual, or report something different;
And to realize how powerful the messages are that are massed produced 
and broadcast, everywhere.
And how we are defeating ourselves, by not having more objective and 
thoughtful reporting..
So, I sent this to a number of news outlets, just to see...to nudge 
them a bit..
I don't know, it's just seems like a good thing sometimes to state 
the obvious, when we get so used to something being a certain way..
R.G.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 'News Organizations Helping To Fuel Chaos Terror'

2006-09-02 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@ 
  wrote:
  
   Many [if not all] of the news organizations;
 Especially, here,  in the United States;
 Have been complicit in their propagating fear and terror.
 They were absolutely complicit in the unquestioning build-up-
 To the Iraqi Invasion...
 They continue to fear monger every stupid utterance of every 
 terror 
  leader.
 They blow out of proportion, every obtuse incident, for 
ratings 
 and 
  sick entertainment value.
 I say  most, if not all, of the news organizations in the 
 United 
  States.
   Are responsible for creating and propagating the fear 
 mongering;
 That they ultimately blame on the current administation.
  
  Uh, Robert, where do you think they're getting
  their ideas and information?
 
 Yeah, I know; but I just wanted to write something in a way;
 That is so obvious, and send it out to some of these [news 
 organizations]...(kind of a hobby of mine).
 That would, sort of, state the obvious, which sometimes, I think, 
can 
 allow people to perhaps take a chance and write something different 
 than the usual, or report something different;
 And to realize how powerful the messages are that are massed 
prodiced 
 and broadcast, everywhere.
 And how we are defeating ourselves, by not having more objective 
and 
 thoughtful reporting..
 So, I sent this to a number of news outlets, just to see...to nudge 
 them a bit..
 I don't know, it's just seems like a good thing sometimes to state 
 the obvious, when we get so used to something being a certain way..
 R.G.

But the problem is that the media is *regurgitating
the administration line*.  They've failed to hold
the administration (and the Republican Congress) 
accountable.  They're afraid to challenge the line.

To claim they're more or less making it up and
*blaming* it on the government doesn't make sense.
The government is *thrilled* at the media's
assistance in propagating fear and terror.

The media isn't going to pay any attention to
you if you accuse them of *blaming* it on the
government.  That's just crackpot.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Guru Dev repeatedly said that he was not forwarding his own beliefs, 
 but those of the Shastras  that others should live by the Shastras, 
  not by their own initiative.
 

That was his job, afterall...

While every good Catholic expects the Pope to be spontaneously doctrinally pure 
of heart, 
the fact is, regardless of his private thoughts on any matter, it is his duty 
to expouse the 
most conservative, Romanly pure doctrine in every utterance. Likewise with a 
Shankaracharya.

MMY assigns himself the same task, but he interprets much of the doctrine quite 
differently than most.

 
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
 wrote:
  
   I've had an active relationship with His Holiness for many many 
   years. 
   Is it out of the norm? Sure! Yes! Of course!
   Is it absolutely real? Sure! Yes! Of course!
   
   Should I deny it, or not speak about it, or doubt my direct 
   perception for the last 25 years, just because those who haven't 
 had 
   such an experience cannot comprehend it, or doubt it?
  
  The same question must have confronted Maharishi, when he was 
 equally
  inspired by visions of Guru Dev in 1955. With the slight difference,
  that he had known him (and his vibe) in body, and was very well in a
  position to judge the validity of his experience. Easy for anybody 
 to
  dismiss this, take an old lecture of GD out of context. Besides 
 that,
  we all know how often masters contradict themselves. Even Guru Dev
  could have changed his mind, once he had left his brahmanical body 
 and
  his Shankaracharya position.
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
 wrote:
 
  Guru Dev repeatedly said that he was not forwarding his own beliefs, 
  but those of the Shastras  that others should live by the Shastras, 
   not by their own initiative.
 
 Yes, I believe so. But even the understanding of what the shastras are
 saying can vary. The Shastras at places contradict themselves. As you
 can see, there are even different practises in the Dasanami
 Sampradaya, which was founded by Shankara. Shankara himself stated in
 a famous poem, (not literally):
 'He who knows this Brahman, he is my teacher, be he Brahmin or
 Chandala.' This is also Shastra.
 
  

Sanskrit scripture evolved over time, just as with other religions. a word that 
had one 
meaning at one point in time might have an entirely different meaning 200 years 
later. 
MMY sidesteps the whole issue by taking the broadest possible interpretation of 
categories, and assuming that the details are modified by Nature as appropriate 
for a 
given society in a different era. IOW, what does it mean to practice compassion 
anyway?

And fidelity in marriage has a radically different meaning for a land-owning 
female in  
18th Century Tibet as compared to a female living in 21st Century Tehran.



  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@ 
  wrote:
   
I've had an active relationship with His Holiness for many many 
years. 
Is it out of the norm? Sure! Yes! Of course!
Is it absolutely real? Sure! Yes! Of course!

Should I deny it, or not speak about it, or doubt my direct 
perception for the last 25 years, just because those who haven't 
  had 
such an experience cannot comprehend it, or doubt it?
   
   The same question must have confronted Maharishi, when he was 
  equally
   inspired by visions of Guru Dev in 1955. With the slight difference,
   that he had known him (and his vibe) in body, and was very well in a
   position to judge the validity of his experience. Easy for anybody 
  to
   dismiss this, take an old lecture of GD out of context. Besides 
  that,
   we all know how often masters contradict themselves. Even Guru Dev
   could have changed his mind, once he had left his brahmanical body 
  and
   his Shankaracharya position.
  
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 It is this last phenomenon I expect to happen a LOT
 in the TM movement when Maharishi finally dies. I
 expect there to be at least half a dozen folks who
 start hearing messages from Maharishi and that
 mini-cults will develop around each of them. On the
 one hand (as a sociological phenomenon) it'll be 
 fun and fascinating to watch. On the other hand
 (as an exercise in mind control and charlatanry) 
 it's IMO likely to get really ugly.
 
 Then again, maybe I'll be surprised and no one 
 will start claiming to be in almost daily communi-
 cation with Maharishi after he dies. 
 
 Yeah, right...like *that's* gonna happen...  :-)


BUT, will it happen WITHIN the TMO? I suspect not.  Anyone who starts claiming 
channeled 
knowledge will be oustracized immediately.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 And that is a major role of the Guru to settle such disputes over the 
 meaning of the Shastras and clarify about apparent contradictions. 
 Which is why they are supposed to be so-o-o-o learned, AND be in the 
 light entirely. 
 Incidentally I am not presenting my own view on this, but that which 
 I have learned from the words of Guru Dev.
 
 

See my previous response about the meaning of words. MMY doesn't pretend to 
have the 
detailed answers for individuals from different countries: he assumes that 
every religion 
has found its own appropriate implementation of the  catagories of behavior 
described in 
the Shastras that is relevant for the time and culture that people find 
themselves in.

The only sure constant is TM. Everything else gets added onto the person as 
their nervous 
system matures, so agonizing over the details is futile and counter-productive.


  





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak geezerfreak@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ 
 wrote:
   Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
   deal in contradictions and have different answers
   to life's questions, depending on the state of
   attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 
   
   snicker
  
  cunt.
 
 belly laugh
 
 I'm a cunt?
 
 What does that make Barry?
 
 (HINT: The above is a quote from one of Barry's
 attacks on me.  Only the name has been changed.)


Well, THAT's different. Barry never says anything offensive.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Is passage thru the Ajna Chakra (third eye) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread wmurphy77
I've only been meditating for 37 years (TM govenor/Siddha...in poor 
standing)and don't really know...any takers?  BillyG.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@ 
 wrote:
 
  Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev behind my 
  research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in the 
  jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or puzzling over 
  the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
  I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as far as I 
  am concerned, I work on his behalf.
 
 Are you claiming that Guru Dev wants you to
 denigrate Maharishi, Paul?


By insinutation, Gurudev wants Paul to lay it all out and let people make their 
own 
decisions based on Paul's collection of quotes.

Of course, as MMY has explained, he's not trying to get everyone to be just 
like him, and 
assumes that each religion and culture has found its own way of dealing with 
the issues of 
human behavior and interaction so what Gurudev says about an issue that is 
specific to 
the culture of India doesn't mean squat about some other culture or about the 
appropriateness of what one of his students might be doing in order to make 
Gurudev's 
teachings acultural.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread wmurphy77
I've only been meditating for 37 years (TM govenor/Siddha...in poor
standing)and don't really know...any takers? BillyG.

(previous subject line cut off)









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Lasik in Cambodia

2006-09-02 Thread bob_brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Given their past, I assume that lasik surgury in Cambodia must be 
 booming...more so than any other country.


***

http://www.salon.com/mwt/col/tenn/2006/08/29/lasik/index_np.html







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 What is the longest time youse have stayed
 /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become easier
 after a couple of weeks or so?



Many years. And perhaps it does get easier, or perhaps I've only gotten old and 
fat, and well-
aware that my taste in women has never been all that great so I stopped 
worrying about it. I 
flirt a lot, but expect nothing and am never surprised OR disappointed.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak 
  geezerfreak@ 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
   wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB 
 no_reply@ 
wrote:
  Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
  deal in contradictions and have different answers
  to life's questions, depending on the state of
  attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 
  
  snicker
 
 cunt.

belly laugh

I'm a cunt?

What does that make Barry?
   
   A brachyphallic gugusse.
  
  A not-very-bright young man who trysts with priests??
 
 
 
 something like that...not that I feel that way about Barry but 
 thought it a nice counterpoint to cunt.  Also, I just read it 
 in Depraved and insulting English and wanted to try it out.


brachyphallic doesn't appear on google save in reference to dogs. No definition.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Guru Dev on varnas (castes)

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
 wrote:
 
  Try the Shastras?
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity no_reply@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason premanandpaul@
   wrote:
   
Guru Dev on Varnas (castes)

http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/upadesh.htm#varnoM
   
   Wherever happiness is to be, there nobody is brahmana, is not
   kshatriya, is not vaishya, is not shudra. In Paramatma there is no
   difference in anyone, the difference then is in business.
   
   Okay, very nice quotes. In fact it says in quintessence, that the
   important thing is mukti and not varna. But it does not define, who a
   Brahmana is.
 
 Like: The knower of Brahman is Brahman?
 As I pointed out, Ganapathy Muni and Kapali Shastri think that the
 Varna system was not hereditary. I pointed out some examples before in
 the other thread. For example, in the Vedas their were brahmanas etc.
 But the word used for them was not jati, which is caste in classical
 Sanskrit. The Veda uses varna, which is the psychological flavour.
 There is no indication at all in the Vedas, that it was hereditary.
 
 My argument was that the scriptures contradict themselves. You said
 that the guru clarifies. I asked you, were does GD define Brahmana.
 Now you go back to scripture.
 
 You say: Guru Dev just spoke shastra
 I say: Shastra gives contradictory statements.
 You say: GD clarifies
 I ask: were he defines Brahmana
 You say:Try Shastras


Obviously, there's no contradiction!







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@ wrote:
 
  
  What is the longest time youse have stayed
  /uurdhva-retas/(brahmacharin)? Does it become easier
  after a couple of weeks or so?
 
 It took 2 years, in my life, my friend. But then all pictures where 
 gone. It is not a easy matter.


For me, it was a spontaneous result of how I lived my life. Why did you WANT to 
be celibate? 
And, given your desire to follow MMY's every whim, why did you have to try for 
2 years?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 nablus108@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
  marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
   premanandpaul@ wrote:
   
Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev 
 behind 
   my 
research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in 
 the 
jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or 
 puzzling 
   over 
the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as far 
 as 
   I 
am concerned, I work on his behalf.
  
  Care for some details on this ? Why do you, some stupid, greedy 
  little fellow who is infamous for writing a redicelous biography 
 of 
  Maharishi, now sensing Guru Dev behind my research... ?
  
   Lot's was right in his insesitive wrath in your direction: You 
 are 
  the scambug of this earth; Paul Mason, what you are doing is 
 simple 
  and gross. 
  
  Why Maharishi cut your scorpion-country off is getting more and 
 more 
  obvious with people like you on board.
  
  Obviously, you will reap what you sow. As we all shall. But you, 
 my 
  friend; be prepared for some extras.
 
 
 
 Okay.
 
 I'm now fully convinced that this Nablus fellow is a troll.
 
 He's not even a meditator but someone who is out to discredit the 
 TMO and MMY by acting like a complete horse's ass.  He sounds more 
 like a fundamentalist Christian with all this fire and brimstone.  
 Perhaps he is Peter from a.m.t.


Or Andrew Skolnick playing what he believs to be the role of a TM TBer...







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread bob_brigante

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
premanandpaul@ 
  wrote:
  
   Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev 
behind my 
   research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in 
the 
   jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or 
puzzling over 
   the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
   I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as far 
as I 
   am concerned, I work on his behalf.
  

  Are you claiming that Guru Dev wants you to
  denigrate Maharishi, Paul?
 
 

*

Paul Mason is just confused, so it is pointless to ask about his 
motives, as he does not understand them. Mason has posted here 
that TM brings the light, yet he no longer practices TM. All this 
talk of working for Guru Dev is just an attempt to rationalize his 
inability to practice a technique which he knows would bring 
enlightenment.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd 
 marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
  premanandpaul@ wrote:
  
   Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev behind 
  my 
   research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in the 
   jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or puzzling 
  over 
   the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
   I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as far as 
  I 
   am concerned, I work on his behalf.
 
 Care for some details on this ? Why do you, some stupid, greedy 
 little fellow who is infamous for writing a redicelous biography of 
 Maharishi, now sensing Guru Dev behind my research... ?
 
  Lot's was right in his insesitive wrath in your direction: You are 
 the scambug of this earth; Paul Mason, what you are doing is simple 
 and gross. 
 
 Why Maharishi cut your scorpion-country off is getting more and more 
 obvious with people like you on board.
 
 Obviously, you will reap what you sow. As we all shall. But you, my 
 friend; be prepared for some extras.


Spake Nablus, channeling Peter Klutz.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Vision of Guru Dev by MMY? Never heard it before today. 
 Never heard of him 'painting a picture' before, unless you mean 
 colouring a photograph which you mentioned over on the googlegroup 
 many many months back, as I recall.

I heard that MMY had a direct inspiration from Gurudev to start teaching. 
That's quite 
vague, compared to saw a vision. It also doesn't make sense given MMY's 
apparently beliefs 
about how higher states of consciousness work. As far as I can tell, he 
believes that the 
images and statues of the devas are allegorical more than faithful visual 
representations of 
them.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
 premanandpaul@ wrote:
 
  What bar are you propping up today?
 
 I'm just having a peek into your future my friend. It's spontanous, 
 can't help it. Amend your ways. Why create more karma than necessary. 
 We should long for the opposite.

What does amount of karma have to do with anything? Karma is unavoidable. To be 
alive is to 
generate infinite amounts.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
on 8/7/06 4:32 PM, Paul Mason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have been practising transcendental meditation regularly for well 
over three decades now, but that has not made me a 'true believer'. 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
 premanandpaul@ 
   wrote:
   
Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev 
 behind my 
research work since way way back, whether it be wandering in 
 the 
jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or 
 puzzling over 
the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as 
far 
 as I 
am concerned, I work on his behalf.
   
 
   Are you claiming that Guru Dev wants you to
   denigrate Maharishi, Paul?
  
  
 
 *
 
 Paul Mason is just confused, so it is pointless to ask about his 
 motives, as he does not understand them. Mason has posted here 
 that TM brings the light, yet he no longer practices TM. All this 
 talk of working for Guru Dev is just an attempt to rationalize his 
 inability to practice a technique which he knows would bring 
 enlightenment.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Men only?

2006-09-02 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Kind of amazing how personal some posts are.  I appreciate your
 openness.  I learned a new word today: gynophobic, fear of or
 contempt for women! 

I'd never write like that using my real name.
I think one aspect of my timidity towards women
consists of the fact(?) that women probably are
less emotional than men, or more accurately, women's
emotions have a more pronounced intellectual aspect,
that they can use as a weapon when they manipulate
men whose emotions are more raw and primitive.  :0









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread bob_brigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 8/7/06 4:32 PM, Paul Mason at premanandpaul@ wrote:
 
 I have been practising transcendental meditation regularly for well 
 over three decades now, but that has not made me a 'true believer'. 
 


 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
  premanandpaul@ 
wrote:

 Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev 
  behind my 
 research work since way way back, whether it be wandering 
in 
  the 
 jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or 
  puzzling over 
 the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
 I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but as 
 far 
  as I 
 am concerned, I work on his behalf.

  
Are you claiming that Guru Dev wants you to
denigrate Maharishi, Paul?
   
   
  
  *
  
  Paul Mason is just confused, so it is pointless to ask about his 
  motives, as he does not understand them. Mason has posted here 
  that TM brings the light, yet he no longer practices TM. All 
this 
  talk of working for Guru Dev is just an attempt to rationalize 
his 
  inability to practice a technique which he knows would bring 
  enlightenment.
 




**

Well, apparently, there is either a semantic problem here 
(by regular you mean sporadic practice of TM, and not everyday 
twice a day practice of TM), or you are contradicting what you have 
posted before to the effect that you do not practice TM every day, 
and have not practiced TM for long periods of time during that three 
decades you refer to. 

The question comes, if you have actually been practicing TM regularly 
(everyday, twice a day) for more than 30 years, how is it that you 
still do not believe in the efficacy of TM, but keep trying to insist 
that Maharishi is not respecting the desire of Guru Dev to enlighten 
the world by teaching TM, which by your own admission brings the 
light?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've only been meditating for 37 years (TM govenor/Siddha...in poor
 standing)and don't really know...any takers? BillyG.
 
 (previous subject line cut off)

Hi, I think yes, it probably is, though I had such an experience long 
before gaining enlightenment. The reason I say probably is that it 
seems like such a normal and necessary part of functioning once 
liberation is attained. Performance of the TM-Sidhis really hastened 
the experience for me. What has your experience been?






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
  Unfortunately, Barry can't deal with teachers who
  deal in contradictions and have different answers
  to life's questions, depending on the state of
  attention or POV that is in operation at the time. 
  
  snicker
 
 cunt.

insect.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Is passage thru the Ajna Chakra (third eye) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I've only been meditating for 37 years (TM govenor/Siddha...in poor 
 standing)and don't really know...any takers?  BillyG.


MMY never discusses Chakras. Good luck with making something up concerning THAT 
aspect 
of TM and theory.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
I have been practising transcendental meditation twice a day since 
October 1970.
Oh a few times when I have been travelling or sick, I guess I went to 
sleep, did anyone else go there? Oh, and for the sake of research I 
have experimented with variants of the technique for some days at a 
time.
But there are some who wish to believe that regularity in meditation 
equals sawing away critical functions of the brain. Strangely that is 
what opponents of TM believe. It is ironic to get so much flack from 
those who are actually practising TM.
I question the motives of those who misrepresent me on this forum and 
on other TM-related forums, it is their agenda that ought to be 
scrutinised, perhaps we will discover who and who is not in the light?



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
 premanandpaul@ wrote:
 
  on 8/7/06 4:32 PM, Paul Mason at premanandpaul@ wrote:
  
  I have been practising transcendental meditation regularly for 
well 
  over three decades now, but that has not made me a 'true 
believer'. 
  
 
 
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ 
  wrote:
  
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
  wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
   premanandpaul@ 
 wrote:
 
  Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru Dev 
   behind my 
  research work since way way back, whether it be wandering 
 in 
   the 
  jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or 
   puzzling over 
  the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
  I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but 
as 
  far 
   as I 
  am concerned, I work on his behalf.
 
   
 Are you claiming that Guru Dev wants you to
 denigrate Maharishi, Paul?


   
   *
   
   Paul Mason is just confused, so it is pointless to ask about 
his 
   motives, as he does not understand them. Mason has posted here 
   that TM brings the light, yet he no longer practices TM. All 
 this 
   talk of working for Guru Dev is just an attempt to rationalize 
 his 
   inability to practice a technique which he knows would bring 
   enlightenment.
  
 
 
 
 
 **
 
 Well, apparently, there is either a semantic problem here 
 (by regular you mean sporadic practice of TM, and not everyday 
 twice a day practice of TM), or you are contradicting what you have 
 posted before to the effect that you do not practice TM every day, 
 and have not practiced TM for long periods of time during that 
three 
 decades you refer to. 
 
 The question comes, if you have actually been practicing TM 
regularly 
 (everyday, twice a day) for more than 30 years, how is it that you 
 still do not believe in the efficacy of TM, but keep trying to 
insist 
 that Maharishi is not respecting the desire of Guru Dev to 
enlighten 
 the world by teaching TM, which by your own admission brings the 
 light?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Is opening the third eye (Ajna) necessary for enlightenment (CC)?

2006-09-02 Thread wmurphy77
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wmurphy77 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  I've only been meditating for 37 years (TM govenor/Siddha...in poor
  standing)and don't really know...any takers? BillyG.
  
  (previous subject line cut off)
 
 Hi, I think yes, it probably is, though I had such an experience long 
 before gaining enlightenment. The reason I say probably is that it 
 seems like such a normal and necessary part of functioning once 
 liberation is attained. Performance of the TM-Sidhis really hastened 
 the experience for me. What has your experience been?



 I have never seen the Ajna Chakra or any other for that matter, but my 
understanding it is essential as the 'spinal highway' is the only way 
back to Spirit. (Brahman).






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 Just to clarify, I think Jim's handling his report-
 ing of his own subjective experiences fairly well.
 But I have seen other folks, in the Rama trip and
 others, who *definitely* used their visions of the
 now-dead teacher to set themselves up as the new
 teacher, and to develop a fanatical following who
 hovered around them waiting for the next message
 from the teacher. And often to pay them a great
 deal of money for delivering these messages.
 
Glad you approve ;-)

As I've said before the only reason I talk about this stuff at all 
is to let people know it is NORMAL, and one doesn't have to be 
special in the least for such experiences. That is something that 
personally confounds me is this very artificial boundary between 
certain experiences and states of being, and people's perceptions of 
them. Especially some here who've been meditating forever, ex TM 
teachers, etc.

No big deal.

PS if anyone feels like they just have to pay me a great deal of 
money, hey let me know, and I'll gladly share my address! ;-)







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have been practising transcendental meditation twice a day since 
 October 1970.
 Oh a few times when I have been travelling or sick, I guess I went to 
 sleep, did anyone else go there? Oh, and for the sake of research I 
 have experimented with variants of the technique for some days at a 
 time.
 But there are some who wish to believe that regularity in meditation 
 equals sawing away critical functions of the brain. Strangely that is 
 what opponents of TM believe. It is ironic to get so much flack from 
 those who are actually practising TM.
 I question the motives of those who misrepresent me on this forum and 
 on other TM-related forums, it is their agenda that ought to be 
 scrutinised, perhaps we will discover who and who is not in the light?


What the hell is a variant of TM?

There's zero and non-zero, how many other variations are there?





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The death of Guru Dev

2006-09-02 Thread Paul Mason
Correction: for the record I dropped practice for a few weeks after 
seeing the look in MMYs eyes whilst standing near him in Royal Albert 
Hall London in the mid-1970's.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I have been practising transcendental meditation twice a day since 
 October 1970.
 Oh a few times when I have been travelling or sick, I guess I went 
to 
 sleep, did anyone else go there? Oh, and for the sake of research I 
 have experimented with variants of the technique for some days at a 
 time.
 But there are some who wish to believe that regularity in 
meditation 
 equals sawing away critical functions of the brain. Strangely that 
is 
 what opponents of TM believe. It is ironic to get so much flack 
from 
 those who are actually practising TM.
 I question the motives of those who misrepresent me on this forum 
and 
 on other TM-related forums, it is their agenda that ought to be 
 scrutinised, perhaps we will discover who and who is not in the 
light?
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
  premanandpaul@ wrote:
  
   on 8/7/06 4:32 PM, Paul Mason at premanandpaul@ wrote:
   
   I have been practising transcendental meditation regularly for 
 well 
   over three decades now, but that has not made me a 'true 
 believer'. 
   
  
  
   
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ 
   wrote:
   

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend 
jstein@ 
   wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
premanandpaul@ 
  wrote:
  
   Okay, it is time for me to own up. I have sensed Guru 
Dev 
behind my 
   research work since way way back, whether it be 
wandering 
  in 
the 
   jungle chatting with swamis or trawling the internet or 
puzzling over 
   the meaning of a rarely used Sanskrit word. 
   I guess I am an unlikely conduit for his teachings, but 
 as 
   far 
as I 
   am concerned, I work on his behalf.
  

  Are you claiming that Guru Dev wants you to
  denigrate Maharishi, Paul?
 
 

*

Paul Mason is just confused, so it is pointless to ask about 
 his 
motives, as he does not understand them. Mason has posted 
here 
that TM brings the light, yet he no longer practices TM. 
All 
  this 
talk of working for Guru Dev is just an attempt to 
rationalize 
  his 
inability to practice a technique which he knows would bring 
enlightenment.
   
  
  
  
  
  **
  
  Well, apparently, there is either a semantic problem here 
  (by regular you mean sporadic practice of TM, and not everyday 
  twice a day practice of TM), or you are contradicting what you 
have 
  posted before to the effect that you do not practice TM every 
day, 
  and have not practiced TM for long periods of time during that 
 three 
  decades you refer to. 
  
  The question comes, if you have actually been practicing TM 
 regularly 
  (everyday, twice a day) for more than 30 years, how is it that 
you 
  still do not believe in the efficacy of TM, but keep trying to 
 insist 
  that Maharishi is not respecting the desire of Guru Dev to 
 enlighten 
  the world by teaching TM, which by your own admission brings the 
  light?
 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




  1   2   >