--Thanks, this is quite obvious if one defines the me = I; the
notion of a delusional self associated with the mind as an identity
separate from Pure Consciousness. This is the snake that actually is
a rope. The snake doesn't exist in itself, therefore the I or me
in this sense can't get
Curtis, or others of course,
Scanning channels
-- a great symptom -- or metaphor -- for later inquiry,
I came across an Elvis Special on ABC.
While not a big fan of Elvis, particularly his hype and and late 60's
/ early 70's press image, and my being a child of the late 60's, Elvis
was the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 18, 2007, at 6:49 PM, Duveyoung wrote:
I read about that, but the version I got had the crows actually
smart
enough, get this!, to drop the nuts on crosswalks-at-traffic-
lights.
Why?
Cuz then, after the
I just saw a clip of JFK giving ask not.. speech. Pure magic, IMO.
Regardless, what you may think of his politics -- I personally liked
many -- not all of his ideas and visions. He was a great speaker,
clear inspiring, articulate and visionary. I know from personal
experience, that he inspired
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: Marrying and Having Children:
Nablus:
If having them does not shift attention away from meditation to
diapers, as it obviously did for the original poster, then why not.
To have them can't ruin your
emptybill wrote:
Over the years I have heard an argument professed by
some former TM meditators who stopped practicing because
they claimed they were deceived about the meaning
of mantra-s.
Empty again:
Baba Hari Dass is an impeccable yogin possessed of vairagya and
dispossessed of any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--Thanks, this is quite obvious if one defines the me = I; the
notion of a delusional self associated with the mind as an identity
separate from Pure Consciousness.
Hridaya puri:I suppose getting the definitions matching
Of course!
--- tertonzeno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Of course!...these were the Anunnaki (the Nephilim
or Giants mentioned
in the Bible), who spliced their own DNA onto the
uncivilized humanoids
living at that time. The whole account is spelled
out in detail in the
works of
I think they're meditating.
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
Anyone know what's the difference, if any, between
citta and manas?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
I have no idea what she meant, thats why I asked you ! The
word
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tertonzeno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--
Of course!...these were the Anunnaki (the Nephilim or Giants
mentioned
in the Bible), who spliced their own DNA onto the uncivilized
humanoids
living at that time. The whole account is spelled out in detail in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just saw a clip of JFK giving ask not.. speech. Pure magic,
IMO.
Regardless, what you may think of his politics -- I personally liked
many -- not all of his ideas and visions. He was a great speaker,
clear
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:26 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hi, Lurk
Never did. What I said was that not having children is a blessing.
Others will claim
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 2:26 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Hi, Lurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
Benjamin Creme's Master's article `The gathering of the Forces of
Light' (Share International March 2007 ) begins: Important events
are taking place in many parts of the world. People everywhere will
be astonished by the reports. These will include sightings, in
unprecedented numbers, of
Questions Answers
Q. (1) On 16 July 2007 a 6.8 magnitude earthquake rocked the world's
largest nuclear plant at Kashiwazaki, Japan, causing a transformer
fire and spills and leaks at the plant. (1) Was the nuclear leak in
Japan worse than the government made out? (2) Was there any UFO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy: Would you acknowledge the possibility that for
one who has very thoroughly studied crop circles,
what may seem biased views to you may in fact
be quite objective?
Rereading it, I'm not sure I made this
qntmpkt wrote: Thanks, this is quite obvious if one defines the
me = I; the notion of a delusional self associated with the mind
as an identity separate from Pure Consciousness. This is the snake
that actually is a rope. The snake doesn't exist in itself,
therefore the I or me in this sense
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
FWIW, vittu is probably the most common curse word hereabouts,
roughly corresponding to fvck (you). The expression mukava
vittu
would be a bit idiosyncratic, IMO. It might well have
been mukavaa,
vittu, a
Well said (written), Edg. Particularly valuable to me was the noise
that comes with (and can't be separated from) the train
metaphor/analogy; that is very fine. Thanks.
Marek
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qntmpkt wrote: Thanks, this is quite
This is a very complicated post - my opinion is it serves to get the mind
engaged- where
as enlightenment is very simple- the me falls away, then there only IS
They say that then it was known that there never was a me, it was Maya- ego
is the
maya- so no cosmic ego's in my path
--- In
--The statement, ...then there only IS is an incomplete description
of existence. A more complete statement would be IsAS:
modifications of pure Conscious such as trees, the sky, the body;
etc; and all of the components that STILL make up an individual,
minus the false illusory I.
Just some thoughts, mostly rambling.
My mother's last surviving sibling, my Aunt Zosia, lives in Oswiciem
(Aushcwitz is in Poland and that's the non-German name of the town).
After reading the NYTimes article Bob posted (below) I went to the US
Holocaust Museum site and began to look at the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
FWIW, vittu is probably the most common curse word hereabouts,
roughly corresponding to fvck (you). The expression mukava
vittu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
God is omnipresent -- what else needs to be said?
Edg
Been thinking about this one, in the context of why bother?, and
trying to figure out why God, or insert motive force of creation
here *does* bother. Or appears to.
--- Ron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a very complicated post - my opinion is it
serves to get the mind engaged- where
as enlightenment is very simple- the me falls away,
then there only IS
It might be quite complicated , but it does/can lead
the mind towards transcending itself. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not visible but attainable and hidden by a thin piece of cloth only.
Who knows, she was just bragging probably - the finns... ;-)
Bragging? Was she referring to her own yawn-ee, then?? :0
yoni mf. [...]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just saw a clip of JFK giving ask not.. speech. Pure magic,
IMO.
Regardless, what you may think of his politics -- I personally liked
many -- not all of his ideas and visions. He was a great speaker,
clear
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
I just saw a clip of JFK giving ask not.. speech. Pure magic,
IMO.
Regardless, what you may think of his politics -- I personally liked
many
http://www.tinyurl.com/2vnc4m
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.tinyurl.com/2vnc4m
All you hot dog eaters have been eating health food all this time --
good ole yellow mustard contains turmeric:
http://www.drgourmet.com/ingredients/mustard.shtml
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
I just saw a clip of JFK giving ask not.. speech. Pure magic,
IMO.
Regardless, what you may think of his politics -- I personally liked
many
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
I just saw a clip of JFK giving ask not.. speech. Pure magic,
IMO.
Regardless, what you may think of his politics -- I personally liked
many
I just read this to swami G and she said yea, that's what happens
It might be quite complicated , but it does/can lead
the mind towards transcending itself. I agree that
enlightenment is simple, but it can come as quite a
shock when the mind attempts to reference itself, to
feel itself as a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--The statement, ...then there only IS is an incomplete description
of existence.
Of course, any statement will never replace the reality of the situation
A more complete statement would be IsAS:
modifications
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, qntmpkt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--The statement, ...then there only IS is an incomplete description
of existence.
Of course, any statement will never replace the reality of the situation
A more complete statement would be IsAS:
modifications
--Below, you ask if I is the individual. Depends upon how you
define it: a. the illusory I that is the core of misidentification,
or b. the individual who remains after the ignorance of
misidentification is gone, and who STILL may refer to herself as I
in ordinary exchanges of conversation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
I just saw a clip of JFK giving ask not.. speech. Pure
magic,
hot dogs are not healthy food, increasing your risk of leukemia amoung
other things
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
matrixmonitor@ wrote:
http://www.tinyurl.com/2vnc4m
All you
This is way too complicated for me, but I ask the usual- is the one writting
this speaking
from Being or about it? Start with that.
We have 3 enlightened one's in our group and though there is not a coaching,
they have
the same basic thing to say because it is coming from that One essence.
Namaste Sajani and Holly,
When one comes upon That which IS, all else - every little
experience (vision, dream, sounds, Samadhi, etc) that ever happened
is absolutely burned to dust. Visions, experiences, dreams,
insights are all wonderful in that they can help to keep one
motivated to
43 matches
Mail list logo