[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: A story of devotion

2013-11-20 Thread indifferent_netizen
And here's a lesson for you on what a Brahmin is Billy boy, something your 
Buddhist bigoted trailer trash mind cannot wrap around and something your 
emotionally retarded ass should refrain from commenting on.
 

 A Brahmin is one whose sole allegiance is to the truth. A Brahmin is not 
fascinated with power, money and sex.  Neither is he fascinated with adulation. 
So confident is his sense of adherence to truth and his integrity that he is 
absolutely fearless, he neither fears God nor fears death. When confronted with 
dishonest people like you Bill he is full of fury and wrath. A Brahmin's curse 
is legendary - for a dishonest, retarded person like you Billy boy my curse is 
a blessing. Whereas someone honest, loving, sincere and authentic will only see 
the humble, kind, loving side.

 

 You have been blessed by a Brahmin today you retarded, Buddhist, bigoted, 
trailer trash, motherfucker.
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Can you please quote something original empty baby?

Any unique insight of yours?

And then there's no beauty in your soul, nothing attractive - just an 
emotionally, psychologically stunted person who parrots others and has to latch 
on to others.

You think some bigoted buddhist trailer trash bitch qualifies as Devi? OMG how 
hilarious Bill - how clueless and retarded you are. For a long time I ignored 
you, because I was well aware of your emotional disability - this time you have 
a crossed a line with the level of your dishonesty.


Do me a favor - just keep Willytex under control - you hear me? He's a good 
match for your intellectual and emotional abilities.

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Oh The Bigoted Buddhist Trailer Trash Billy Boy is frothing at the mouth again?

But not your parroted sutras on Mysticism and Enlightenment this time is it?

What a worthless piece of shit you are - no sensitivity, no intelligent, no 
heart, no awareness of your behavior, your dishonesty - just a constant choking 
on parroted vomit you dumb emotionally, psychologically retarded motherfucker. 

You disgust me Bill.

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote:

 Xenos means stranger - so by definition you don't know anything about him. You 
are just an idiot. 

 

 You are nothing but a troll here so there is no reason for him to listen to 
any comment you might make. Trolls like you are a dime a dozen in bhajan halls. 
 
 

 You are not a brahmana but just a malicious dog-eater trying to shit upon this 
forum. Go back into the ether to your other rakshasa-s. Chandalas like you are 
unworthy of human form. 

 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 OMG why do I feel so much contempt and disgust for cold, heartless bastards 
like Xeno, emptybill, Rick et al..?
 

 I have more respect for my ex, even if she were ultimately delusional. She 
sang the bhajans so beautifully, with so much devotion that she cried, not to 
mention how beautiful she was. She would always tell me that one should cry for 
God, and I would stare at her like Xeno would - that is when I was trouble 
expressing emotion but I was young, only 25.
 

 What a shame then, these emotionally retarded 60 year olds - the Xenos, the 
Bigoted Bills, the Ricks.

 

 Xeno - you listening - you psychopath?
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 And I'm trying to imagine the cold, heartless psychopath Xeno at Amma's 
programs..LOL..I suppose I would abuse, humiliate him out of the program hall 
:-)
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 And I remember watching Rick at Amma's programs in Dearborn Nov 2010 and that 
guy was so hilarious. It was as if he was watching some entertainment, I had 
ended up sitting at a place where I had a good view of him  - he was just 
looking around during Bhajans time, no heart clearly, LOL

 

 Totally stuck in the head (when I later talked to him) - an extremely unaware, 
insensitive individual - master of intellectual masturbation.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 I loved this very much dear Emily.
 

 The most charming thing about the Amma scene is the bhajans, the heart, the 
devotion, this crying to God - very much my path as well. In my case it's like 
Ron said - there was no adulation to any entity or person or God or Guru but 
rather to the infinite.
 

 I never lost my discrimination, my power, never formed any religious 
delusional fantasies - never worshiped or treated Amma as some invincible, 
infallible Goddess.
 

 What a shame - that she's turned out to be a fraud, a charlatan. It makes me 
sad - because there seems to be so much promise. The sensitivity, the heart and 
the love of Amma devotees is very rare - but clearly the intellect is lacking. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 To 

[FairfieldLife] A Toy Company That Gets It

2013-11-20 Thread TurquoiseB
When I'm out and about, I sometimes see a cool dinosaur that Maya
doesn't have yet in the window of a toy store and go in to buy it. More
often than not, the person at the checkout desk says something like,
Your little boy is sure to love this.

Yeah, right. Maya knows all the scientific names for each of her many
dinos. She builds Lego structures that defy belief. At age
not-quite-four, she's better at computer games than I will ever be. She
ain't gettin' no pink, pretty, and no thought required presents to
program her into a pink, pretty, and no thought possible young woman
clone from her Uncle Barry.

http://www.upworthy.com/if-3-little-girls-did-this-to-my-house-id-do-eve\
rything-i-could-to-get-them-full-rides-to-stanford
 
http://www.upworthy.com/if-3-little-girls-did-this-to-my-house-id-do-ev\
erything-i-could-to-get-them-full-rides-to-stanford



[FairfieldLife] Re: Derren Brown: awesome display

2013-11-20 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Orson Welles discusses the nature of 'cold reading', a type of
analysis used by many phony psychics and fortune tellers to trick their
customers into thinking they indeed do have special powers, and how some
can become so skilled at it that they actually trick themselves into
believing they are truly psychic.

  http://youtu.be/IjPsnfysrp8 http://youtu.be/IjPsnfysrp8
http://youtu.be/IjPsnfysrp8 http://youtu.be/IjPsnfysrp8
http://youtu.be/IjPsnfysrp8 http://youtu.be/IjPsnfysrp8

Excellent. His point at the end about becoming a shut-eye is exactly
the point I was making earlier. If one is born with a talent for the
tricks of the trade such as cold reading, an eye for facial expression
and body language, and an ability to prompt people in a certain
direction via verbal and eye-movement cues, in time one can actually
start to believe the I'm psychic stuff. That's when it gets dangerous.

  How do you tell a fake psychic from a real one?

Easy. If they're making money from their abilities, they're fake.  :-)


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote:

  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
   
Re Derren definitely possesses unusual abilities:
   
Yes, but not *psychic* abilities. He uses NLP trickery
   (eye-movement
   cues); lip-reading expertise; amazing memory recall; covert
hypnosis;
   muscle reading; old-fashioned conjuring ; . . . ; but nothing that
   can't
   be understood by a hard-nosed scientist.
  
  
   So do the psychics.
  
   That's his point. Funny how some miss it.


  For the record, my point is that it strikes me as much more likely
that
  psychics are using the skills above to do what they do subconsciously
  than that they are able to do what they do because some supernatural
  entity is helping them to, also subconsciously.

  The psychics using these techniques don't have to know that they're
  doing it, or have been trained in how to use them. Any competitive
poker
  player uses all of these techniques in every game, but they aren't
  necessarily *aware* that they're using them.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Derren Brown: awesome display

2013-11-20 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 I sometimes see this as it is after another show I watch when I can. 
I would give it a grade of B (using my subjective scale for network TV
here in the States).

B sounds about right. It wasn't great, but it was often well done and
thought-provoking, especially the episodes that centered not on
*whether* someone was lying, but *why*.


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@ wrote:

  Speaking of such things, did you ever get a US TV series called Lie
To Me there in the UK?

  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote:

  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
  
   Re Derren definitely possesses unusual abilities:
  
   Yes, but not *psychic* abilities. He uses NLP trickery
(eye-movement
  cues); lip-reading expertise; amazing memory recall; covert hypnosis;
  muscle reading; old-fashioned conjuring ; . . . ; but nothing that
can't
  be understood by a hard-nosed scientist.


  So do the psychics.

  That's his point. Funny how some miss it.

  Speaking of such things, did you ever get a US TV series called
  Lie To Me there in the UK? It's definitely worth a watch, if
  you did and it comes up on reruns. Tim Roth (always great)
  plays a character based on the real work of Dr. Paul Ekman
  and the Ekman Group on facial recognition and body
  language.


   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@ wrote:
  
   I watched the whole thing and found it utterly fascinating. The
  interesting thing is, Derren definitely possesses unusual abilities
and
  he knows this so the 'joke' is on us, the viewers, who are supposedly
  'in the know' about what he is doing to the 'unsuspecting' 5 experts.
  The whole concept and execution was very watchable and I would like
to
  see more from this guy.
  
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@ wrote:
  
   On the thread Judy referenced there's a cynical message by one
  curtisdeltablues It makes more sense that his NLP skills are
instantly
  effective and magical on strangers. Yeah that makes much more sense.
How
  could anyone actually give money to another person for the purposes
of
  making it look like they had done something magical?:
  
   The clip he's talking about - where Derren gets strangers to hand
  over their wallets and keys - is a common criminal scam. It relies on
a
  pattern interrupt, as they say in NLP jargon, and body mirror
imaging
  and is clearly effective. (Apologies if link is blocked for US
viewers.)
  
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
  
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@ wrote:
  
   Re As a confirmed skeptic, would he even recognize it if he were
  getting genuine little nudges from the Beyond?:
  
   Yes, that's an intriguing suggestion. However, having taken a look
at
  the previous thread you referenced, I'm sure you've all got it wrong.
  Yes, he does use NLP ideas in some tricks but this is essentially a
  (covert) hypnosis session. At the point where he asks them if they
now
  believe in God - and they all say Yes - he could have got them to
go
  down on all fours and bark like a dog - the typical stage hypnosis
  entertainment.
   He carries it off with panache though.
  
   Re In any case, I do still think (as I said in the earlier
  discussion) that he's crpy.:
  
   That's his act! He plays up to the Svengali archetype. That's the
fun
  of his show (and I've seen him live).
  
   The segment where he copied by remote-viewing what a psychic was
  drawing was probably pulled off by him suggesting subliminally key
  images as he talks to her. (What we see is edited, of course.)
  
   The segment where he knows what the woman had dreamed of over the
  previous nights was another knock-out. Pure effect as Derren Brown
  calls it. Still trying to figure that one out.
  
   He's a divisive figure in the UK. Some people (rationalists) really
  loathe him as he's such a consummate professional he inevitably makes
  viewers think, Hey, maybe there's something genuinely psychic going
  on.
  
   Most people, like me, recognise him as an outstanding magician and
  just enjoy being baffled. Some of his stunts it has literally taken
me
  years of head-scratching to work out how he did them.
  
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@ wrote:
  
   Yes, thank you. I've actually seen this segment before--someone
  posted it here a few years ago and we had a bit of discussion about
it
  (the thread begins with #161279 if you want to have a look).
  
   Seeing it again, I find I've changed my mind somewhat about what's
  going on. I think he may, in fact, have a gift, but he doesn't know
  it; and it 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Unemoticon

2013-11-20 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard Williams  wrote:

 Have a day unemoticon:


  [Inline image 1]

This is actually very funny. Well done.





[FairfieldLife] Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread TurquoiseB
Hey, I didn't write it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.htm\
l
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.ht\
ml





[FairfieldLife] RE: Derren Brown: awesome display

2013-11-20 Thread cardemaister
NBD, but never occurred to me Derren could be gay, as he is...
 

  
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
wrote:
 
  I sometimes see this as it is after another show I watch when I can. 
 I would give it a grade of B (using my subjective scale for network TV
 here in the States).
 
 B sounds about right. It wasn't great, but it was often well done and
 thought-provoking, especially the episodes that centered not on
 *whether* someone was lying, but *why*.
 
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
  s3raphita@ wrote:
 
  Speaking of such things, did you ever get a US TV series called Lie
 To Me there in the UK?
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
  turquoiseb@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
wrote:
  
   Re Derren definitely possesses unusual abilities:
  
   Yes, but not *psychic* abilities. He uses NLP trickery
 (eye-movement
  cues); lip-reading expertise; amazing memory recall; covert hypnosis;
  muscle reading; old-fashioned conjuring ; . . . ; but nothing that
 can't
  be understood by a hard-nosed scientist.
 
 
  So do the psychics.
 
  That's his point. Funny how some miss it.
 
  Speaking of such things, did you ever get a US TV series called
  Lie To Me there in the UK? It's definitely worth a watch, if
  you did and it comes up on reruns. Tim Roth (always great)
  plays a character based on the real work of Dr. Paul Ekman
  and the Ekman Group on facial recognition and body
  language.
 
 
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
awoelflebater@ wrote:
  
   I watched the whole thing and found it utterly fascinating. The
  interesting thing is, Derren definitely possesses unusual abilities
 and
  he knows this so the 'joke' is on us, the viewers, who are supposedly
  'in the know' about what he is doing to the 'unsuspecting' 5 experts.
  The whole concept and execution was very watchable and I would like
 to
  see more from this guy.
  
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
s3raphita@ wrote:
  
   On the thread Judy referenced there's a cynical message by one
  curtisdeltablues It makes more sense that his NLP skills are
 instantly
  effective and magical on strangers. Yeah that makes much more sense.
 How
  could anyone actually give money to another person for the purposes
 of
  making it look like they had done something magical?:
  
   The clip he's talking about - where Derren gets strangers to hand
  over their wallets and keys - is a common criminal scam. It relies on
 a
  pattern interrupt, as they say in NLP jargon, and body mirror
 imaging
  and is clearly effective. (Apologies if link is blocked for US
 viewers.)
  
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E 
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E 
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
  
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
s3raphita@ wrote:
  
   Re As a confirmed skeptic, would he even recognize it if he were
  getting genuine little nudges from the Beyond?:
  
   Yes, that's an intriguing suggestion. However, having taken a look
 at
  the previous thread you referenced, I'm sure you've all got it wrong.
  Yes, he does use NLP ideas in some tricks but this is essentially a
  (covert) hypnosis session. At the point where he asks them if they
 now
  believe in God - and they all say Yes - he could have got them to
 go
  down on all fours and bark like a dog - the typical stage hypnosis
  entertainment.
   He carries it off with panache though.
  
   Re In any case, I do still think (as I said in the earlier
  discussion) that he's crpy.:
  
   That's his act! He plays up to the Svengali archetype. That's the
 fun
  of his show (and I've seen him live).
  
   The segment where he copied by remote-viewing what a psychic was
  drawing was probably pulled off by him suggesting subliminally key
  images as he talks to her. (What we see is edited, of course.)
  
   The segment where he knows what the woman had dreamed of over the
  previous nights was another knock-out. Pure effect as Derren Brown
  calls it. Still trying to figure that one out.
  
   He's a divisive figure in the UK. Some people (rationalists) really
  loathe him as he's such a consummate 

[FairfieldLife] Followup to the spinning Egyptian god of death

2013-11-20 Thread TurquoiseB
Posted because of synchronicity with my The Woo Factor post yesterday.

Back on June 24, 2013, Nabby said:
Salyavin will have an explanation for this mystery no doubt - but the
statue still spinns. He then went on to link this spinning statue to
other miracles touted as such by Benny Creme:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/348467
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/348467

Sorry, Nabby...the miracle has been solved:

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/11/20/egyptian-spinning-statue-_n_4\
307500.html?utm_hp_ref=uk
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/11/20/egyptian-spinning-statue-_n_\
4307500.html?utm_hp_ref=uk

But those who need Woo will still see Woo...






[FairfieldLife] RE: Derren Brown: awesome display

2013-11-20 Thread cardemaister
FWIW, Derren Brown portraits:
 

 
https://www.google.fi/search?q=derren+brown+portraitstbm=ischtbo=usource=univsa=Xei=XJOMUuFchMTiBM3KgLgEved=0CCwQsAQbiw=1280bih=630
 
https://www.google.fi/search?q=derren+brown+portraitstbm=ischtbo=usource=univsa=Xei=XJOMUuFchMTiBM3KgLgEved=0CCwQsAQbiw=1280bih=630
 
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister@... wrote:

 NBD, but never occurred to me Derren could be gay, as he is...
 

  
 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
wrote:
 
  I sometimes see this as it is after another show I watch when I can. 
 I would give it a grade of B (using my subjective scale for network TV
 here in the States).
 
 B sounds about right. It wasn't great, but it was often well done and
 thought-provoking, especially the episodes that centered not on
 *whether* someone was lying, but *why*.
 
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
  s3raphita@ wrote:
 
  Speaking of such things, did you ever get a US TV series called Lie
 To Me there in the UK?
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
  turquoiseb@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
wrote:
  
   Re Derren definitely possesses unusual abilities:
  
   Yes, but not *psychic* abilities. He uses NLP trickery
 (eye-movement
  cues); lip-reading expertise; amazing memory recall; covert hypnosis;
  muscle reading; old-fashioned conjuring ; . . . ; but nothing that
 can't
  be understood by a hard-nosed scientist.
 
 
  So do the psychics.
 
  That's his point. Funny how some miss it.
 
  Speaking of such things, did you ever get a US TV series called
  Lie To Me there in the UK? It's definitely worth a watch, if
  you did and it comes up on reruns. Tim Roth (always great)
  plays a character based on the real work of Dr. Paul Ekman
  and the Ekman Group on facial recognition and body
  language.
 
 
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
awoelflebater@ wrote:
  
   I watched the whole thing and found it utterly fascinating. The
  interesting thing is, Derren definitely possesses unusual abilities
 and
  he knows this so the 'joke' is on us, the viewers, who are supposedly
  'in the know' about what he is doing to the 'unsuspecting' 5 experts.
  The whole concept and execution was very watchable and I would like
 to
  see more from this guy.
  
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
s3raphita@ wrote:
  
   On the thread Judy referenced there's a cynical message by one
  curtisdeltablues It makes more sense that his NLP skills are
 instantly
  effective and magical on strangers. Yeah that makes much more sense.
 How
  could anyone actually give money to another person for the purposes
 of
  making it look like they had done something magical?:
  
   The clip he's talking about - where Derren gets strangers to hand
  over their wallets and keys - is a common criminal scam. It relies on
 a
  pattern interrupt, as they say in NLP jargon, and body mirror
 imaging
  and is clearly effective. (Apologies if link is blocked for US
 viewers.)
  
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E 
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E 
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOdYgEDSm7E
  
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
s3raphita@ wrote:
  
   Re As a confirmed skeptic, would he even recognize it if he were
  getting genuine little nudges from the Beyond?:
  
   Yes, that's an intriguing suggestion. However, having taken a look
 at
  the previous thread you referenced, I'm sure you've all got it wrong.
  Yes, he does use NLP ideas in some tricks but this is essentially a
  (covert) hypnosis session. At the point where he asks them if they
 now
  believe in God - and they all say Yes - he could have got them to
 go
  down on all fours and bark like a dog - the typical stage hypnosis
  entertainment.
   He carries it off with panache though.
  
   Re In any case, I do still think (as I said in the earlier
  discussion) that he's crpy.:
  
   That's his act! He plays up to the Svengali archetype. That's the
 fun
  of his show (and I've seen him live).
  
   The segment where he copied by remote-viewing what a psychic was
  drawing was probably pulled off by him suggesting subliminally 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of herself that 
Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone with such a reportedly 
wonderful life like hers could write such nasty, posts ridiculing me. Then I 
saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with tight, smug 
smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard 
that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty 
posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com 
wrote:
 
  
Hey, I didn't write it. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 





[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: A story of devotion

2013-11-20 Thread dhamiltony2k5
“Yahoo Groups, in its sole discretion, may terminate or remove any content, 
Group or your Yahoo ID immediately and without notice if (a) Yahoo believes 
that you have acted inconsistently with the spirit or the letter of the Yahoo 
Terms of Service or the Yahoo Groups Guidelines, or (b) Yahoo believes you have 
violated or tried to violate the rights of others. Please help us keep Yahoo 
Groups an enjoyable and positive experience. If you see a Group or content that 
violates our rules, please let us know.”  
 


 Yes. This here is about the survival of our FFL list. 
 


 Dear FFL, now more clearly than even before it is getting to be time to avert 
the danger of ultimate termination to our FFL group community before it becomes 
too late. Shutting the Fairfieldlife forum down has been tried by subversion 
like this before. We must act to protect ourselves. I call upon the moderation 
of this community to close the membership of this hooligan 
'indifferent_netizen' masquerading such hateful thought on the pages of our FFL.
 -Buck 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:

 Why on Earth (or perhaps why in Hell) did you pick the handle 
'indifferent_netizen'? It almost seems more applicable as a name for me, as 
portrayed by you, than for you.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, indifferent_netizen wrote:

 Don't be so retarded Xeno.

My confronting and humiliating emotionally stunted like you and emptybill 
doesn't taint the beauty, the intelligence, the love, sensitivity - the amazing 
awesomeness of my personal consciousness.

Don't confuse what I do with who I am. I suppose that's why you are retarded :-)


 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:

 If you cannot see some beauty in everything, what does that say about you?


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Indifferent_Netizen wrote:

 Can you please quote something original empty baby?

Any unique insight of yours?

And then there's no beauty in your soul, nothing attractive - just an 
emotionally, psychologically stunted person who parrots others and has to latch 
on to others.

You think some bigoted buddhist trailer trash bitch qualifies as Devi? OMG how 
hilarious Bill - how clueless and retarded you are. For a long time I ignored 
you, because I was well aware of your emotional disability - this time you have 
a crossed a line with the level of your dishonesty.


Do me a favor - just keep Willytex under control - you hear me? He's a good 
match for your intellectual and emotional abilities.

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Oh The Bigoted Buddhist Trailer Trash Billy Boy is frothing at the mouth again?

But not your parroted sutras on Mysticism and Enlightenment this time is it?

What a worthless piece of shit you are - no sensitivity, no intelligent, no 
heart, no awareness of your behavior, your dishonesty - just a constant choking 
on parroted vomit you dumb emotionally, psychologically retarded motherfucker. 

You disgust me Bill.

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote:

 Xenos means stranger - so by definition you don't know anything about him. You 
are just an idiot. 

 

 You are nothing but a troll here so there is no reason for him to listen to 
any comment you might make. Trolls like you are a dime a dozen in bhajan halls. 
 
 

 You are not a brahmana but just a malicious dog-eater trying to shit upon this 
forum. Go back into the ether to your other rakshasa-s. Chandalas like you are 
unworthy of human form. 

 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 OMG why do I feel so much contempt and disgust for cold, heartless bastards 
like Xeno, emptybill, Rick et al..?
 

 I have more respect for my ex, even if she were ultimately delusional. She 
sang the bhajans so beautifully, with so much devotion that she cried, not to 
mention how beautiful she was. She would always tell me that one should cry for 
God, and I would stare at her like Xeno would - that is when I was trouble 
expressing emotion but I was young, only 25.
 

 What a shame then, these emotionally retarded 60 year olds - the Xenos, the 
Bigoted Bills, the Ricks.

 

 Xeno - you listening - you psychopath?
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 And I'm trying to imagine the cold, heartless psychopath Xeno at Amma's 
programs..LOL..I suppose I would abuse, humiliate him out of the program hall 
:-)
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 And I remember watching Rick at Amma's programs in Dearborn Nov 2010 and that 
guy was so hilarious. It was as if he was watching some entertainment, I had 
ended up sitting at a place where I had a good view of him  - he was just 
looking around during Bhajans time, no heart clearly, LOL

 

 Totally stuck in the head (when I later talked to him) - an extremely unaware, 
insensitive individual - master of 

[FairfieldLife] Scientology super power shocker!

2013-11-20 Thread salyavin808
Look out Fairfield, the church of $cientology has upped the ante with it's 
new super powers centre:
 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-church-of-scientologys-new-145m-complex-has-generated-more-in-fundraising-than-it-cost-8950282.html
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-church-of-scientologys-new-145m-complex-has-generated-more-in-fundraising-than-it-cost-8950282.html
 
 

 Apparently one can become, amongst other things, aware of awareness! Sounds 
like they are well on your patch. No mention of levitation though [maybe 
they're not *that* stupid] but they are claiming to revive the dead! we look 
forward to a new novel by Ron Hubbard shortly.


[FairfieldLife] Re: Scientology super power shocker!

2013-11-20 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808  wrote:

 Look out Fairfield, the church of $cientology has upped the ante
with it's new super powers centre:


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-church-of-scientolo\
gys-new-145m-complex-has-generated-more-in-fundraising-than-it-cost-8950\
282.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-church-of-scientol\
ogys-new-145m-complex-has-generated-more-in-fundraising-than-it-cost-895\
0282.html

  Apparently one can become, amongst other things, aware of awareness!
Sounds like they are well on your patch. No mention of levitation though
[maybe they're not *that* stupid] but they are claiming to revive the
dead! we look forward to a new novel by Ron Hubbard shortly.


Despite a youthful penchant for science fiction, I admit to never having
read any of the novels by L. Ron Hubbard. Any desire to fill this
obvious lack in my scifi education was squelched in 1971 when a Canadian
scifi fanzine began giving out awards for the Worst Science Fiction of
the Year. They called their award statuette the Elron.  :-)





[FairfieldLife] RE: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
Barry must have creamed his pants when he saw the title of this article. You 
can just imagine his bitter disappointment when he read it and found that the 
research it reports on doesn't apply to his critics on FFL.
 

 But the title was just too good to waste, and he figures most folks here won't 
actually read the article anyway, so he might as well post the link and 
pretend. As long as it sounds like it might be demeaning to his female critics, 
it suits his purposes.

Barry wrote:

  Hey, I didn't write it. 

 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 
 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 






RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to know about 
what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the foggiest idea how 
revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and ridicule that have been 
directed her way. 
 

Share spewed:
 turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of herself 
that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone with such a 
reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty, posts ridiculing 
me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with 
tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. 
I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by 
her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
   Hey, I didn't write it. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 


 
 
 

 
 





 
 
 
 











[FairfieldLife] RE: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread awoelflebater
That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also looking 
at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by the pristine 
beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays. Focus on the 
scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course it isn't as 
interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then there's no 
accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured in Consciousness 
do you think? 
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to know about 
what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the foggiest idea how 
revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and ridicule that have been 
directed her way. 
 

Share spewed:
 turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of herself 
that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone with such a 
reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty, posts ridiculing 
me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with 
tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. 
I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by 
her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
   Hey, I didn't write it. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 


 
 
 

 
 





 
 
 
 










 


[FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Scientology super power shocker!

2013-11-20 Thread salyavin808
 Despite a youthful penchant for science fiction, I admit to never having read 
any of the novels by L. Ron Hubbard. Any desire to fill this obvious lack in my 
scifi education was squelched in 1971 when a Canadian scifi fanzine began 
giving out awards for the Worst Science Fiction of the Year. They called their 
award statuette the Elron.  :-)
 

 I enjoyed Battlefield Earth but not so much that I would recommend it. 
Especially not to a sci-fi afficionado! But it's great fun and has some good 
ideas, like the Earth being invaded by a mining company that finds the Voyager 
probe - made out of rare metals - and appreciates the fact we put directions on 
the side about where to find us. Hmmm, It does all kind of goes downhill after 
that so no need for you to read it...
 

 Legend has it he wrote the whole 1000 pages in two weeks in hospital after 
he'd brought himself back to life (again). He died and went to heaven twice and 
had a look round, the story goes, but decided to stay on Earth and finish his 
mission. And the super powers building is quite an achievement, the TMO could 
sure pick up a few tips on fundraising from these guys!
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 wrote:
 
 Look out Fairfield, the church of $cientology has upped the ante with it's 
 new super powers centre: 
 
 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-church-of-scientologys-new-145m-complex-has-generated-more-in-fundraising-than-it-cost-8950282.html
  
 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-church-of-scientologys-new-145m-complex-has-generated-more-in-fundraising-than-it-cost-8950282.html

 
 Apparently one can become, amongst other things, aware of awareness! Sounds 
 like they are well on your patch. No mention of levitation though [maybe 
 they're not *that* stupid] but they are claiming to revive the dead! we look 
 forward to a new novel by Ron Hubbard shortly.


 Despite a youthful penchant for science fiction, I admit to never having read 
any of the novels by L. Ron Hubbard. Any desire to fill this obvious lack in my 
scifi education was squelched in 1971 when a Canadian scifi fanzine began 
giving out awards for the Worst Science Fiction of the Year. They called their 
award statuette the Elron.  :-)






RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread awoelflebater
Here Share, since you can't seem to see past me see if you can enjoy these: 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of herself 
that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone with such a 
reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty, posts ridiculing 
me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with 
tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. 
I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by 
her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
   Hey, I didn't write it. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 


 
 
 

 
 





 
 
 
 











[FairfieldLife] RE: What I Did Today

2013-11-20 Thread awoelflebater
Hey Em, I know. I can tell from your past posting that you love the ocean and 
the elements and the walks where the spray hits you in the face and you can 
smell the brininess of the sea. You seem to take many ocean walks and no doubt 
your dog is running with you in the sand and having a glorious time and when 
you return to your home you feel invigorated and cleansed by the stinging air 
and the exhilaration of it all. Glad you could appreciate the picture without 
getting too hung up with how much I look like a Nazi. (As you would say 
smile.)
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Ann, you are my kinda girl for sure (yes, I'm heterosexual...so far at 
least...smile)I would rather be there than anywhere.   
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  Hey Share, here is somewhere I went this last weekend and the breakers were 
spraying salty droplets and the mist was blowing in and the sand was hard and 
wide. You can tell from my face that I am loving it.
 
 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Soon, Richard, I'll be going to the Whole Foods in Annapolis. They have TWO 
kinds of quinoa concoctions at the salad bar. How many different kinds of 
quinoa salad does your Whole Foods have?
PS I LOVE these photos of the different places you visit or drive by!
 

 
 
 On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:25 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... wrote:
 
   Tonight we went to this place:
 


 

 On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Today I drove by this place: 

 


 

 On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 This morning I went to this place: 

 
 

 

 On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 On  the way home from the store I visited this place:
 

 


 
 
 On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 There;s a rock and roll running marathon here today and there having a Formula 
Grand Prix race up in Austin. 

 But, I went to this place today:
 

 
 
 


 

 On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Today I went by this place. What are those people all lined up for, waiting 
for days? 

 


 

 On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Later today I drove past this place: 

 


 

 On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... 
wrote:
   
 There's an app for this:
 https://twitter.com/ https://twitter.com/
 
 I'm sure everyone on FFL will sign up for your tweets. 
 
 On 11/15/2013 12:07 PM, Richard Williams wrote:
 

   Alright, I'm back on the discussion board; sorry for the delay but I had to 
go here:: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




 




 




 




 




 




 





 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 



 



 


[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread awoelflebater
Actually, I found the article very interesting but not for the reason Barry 
posted it because he either, evidently, didn't read it or misread it. But if 
you hadn't pointed out the discrepancy between Barry's motives and what the 
article actually said, Judy, I wouldn't have read it. But I'm glad I did. It 
explained Share's comments and motivation in her post this morning very clearly 
among other, more general, theories and ideas on the subject of competitiveness 
and perception of women by other women and what motivates these things.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Barry must have creamed his pants when he saw the title of this article. You 
can just imagine his bitter disappointment when he read it and found that the 
research it reports on doesn't apply to his critics on FFL.
 

 But the title was just too good to waste, and he figures most folks here won't 
actually read the article anyway, so he might as well post the link and 
pretend. As long as it sounds like it might be demeaning to his female critics, 
it suits his purposes.

Barry wrote:

  Hey, I didn't write it. 

 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 
 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 


 





Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Richard J. Williams

You got to the office early today!

On 11/20/2013 8:08 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*Barry must have creamed his pants when he saw the title of this 
article. You can just imagine his bitter disappointment when he read 
it and found that the research it reports on doesn't apply to his 
critics on FFL.*


*
*
*But the title was just too good to waste, and he figures most folks 
here won't actually read the article anyway, so he might as well post 
the link and /pretend. /As long as it /sounds/ like it might 
be demeaning to his female critics, it suits his purposes.


Barry wrote:*

 Hey, I didn't write it.

 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html








Re: [FairfieldLife] Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 11/20/2013 8:09 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to 
know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the 
foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms 
and ridicule that have been directed her way.




Share spewed:
turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of 
herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone 
with such a reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such 
nasty, posts ridiculing me. Then I saw that picture of her looking 
like, IMO, an SS commando with tight, smug smile, cocky posture and 
judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard that by the age of 
40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty posts 
towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.




On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... 
wrote:

Hey, I didn't write it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html









Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Richard J. Williams
You posted your photo to the wrong thread. Why didn't you respond to the 
My Face thread? Go figure.


On 11/20/2013 8:14 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:


That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also 
looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded 
by the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two 
birthdays. Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show 
you. Of course it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls 
in Texas but then there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is 
Knowledge Structured in Consciousness do you think?




---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to 
know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the 
foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms 
and ridicule that have been directed her way.




Share spewed:
turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of 
herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone 
with such a reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such 
nasty, posts ridiculing me. Then I saw that picture of her looking 
like, IMO, an SS commando with tight, smug smile, cocky posture and 
judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard that by the age of 
40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty posts 
towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.




On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... 
wrote:

Hey, I didn't write it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html









[FairfieldLife] Al Gore debates Global Warming

2013-11-20 Thread wgm4u
Watch, if you have an open mind.
  
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDI2NVTYRXU 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDI2NVTYRXU


Re: [FairfieldLife] MyFace

2013-11-20 Thread Richard J. Williams
Now this is funny - according to my webpage counter, seven people 
visited the MyFace page, but not one submitted a photo of their face. LoL!


http://www.rwilliams.us/myface/

On 10/31/2013 11:43 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
Thanks for the comment on my face, but you don't seem to have included 
an attached photo of your own. Go figure.


So, I guess we know who at least one troll, since you visited the site 
at least twice using a Linux machine, according to my IP recording 
script.


P.S. Just because you may not have any hair or many teeth left, 
doesn't mean yours would be the only image with that in common.


On 10/31/2013 10:49 AM, Bhairitu wrote:


So you do look like  a troll.  Which Austin bridge was that taken 
under? :-D


On 10/30/2013 08:32 AM, Richard Williams wrote:
You've heard of 'My Space'. And, you've heard of 'Facebook'. My new 
social networking site will be called 'My Face'.


Just post pictures of your face, nothing else, and then post 
comments about each others face. Everyone loves to make comments 
about other people's face.  Don't know HTML? Send me a photo of your 
face along with your real name and I'll put up it  up on the web for 
you. It will be fun and I'll be a millionaire in a year or two. 
Don't be shy just because you've got no hair or teeth left. LoL!


Inline image 1

http://www.rwilliams.us/myface/










Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing post that 
Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or perhaps at this point 
she's simply totally self deluded about her alleged honesty. 

Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the MGC has 
directed at me over the past year. 

Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm pandering. But if 
I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I deserved it 
retroactively!

This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's so 
desperate to present herself as.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com 
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also looking 
at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by the pristine 
beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays. Focus on the 
scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course it isn't as 
interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then there's no 
accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured in Consciousness 
do you think? 


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:


And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to know about 
what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the foggiest idea how 
revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and ridicule that have been 
directed her way. 


Share spewed:

turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of herself that 
Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone with such a reportedly 
wonderful life like hers could write such nasty, posts ridiculing me. Then I 
saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with tight, smug 
smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard 
that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty 
posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
  
Hey, I didn't write it. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 







[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread sharelong60
Ann, I saw your photo after I read your post ridiculing me so your Politically 
Correct answers are wasted on me. Like the one you foisted on Ravi about why 
you didn't meet with him in person. He's still simpering after you and calling 
you dear Ann all the time so I guess you were successful in that instance. And 
if you really wanted to send me a photo of the scenery, why didn't you? Are you 
really telling me that your photographer husband didn't take any of just the 
scenery?!
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

 That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also looking 
at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by the pristine 
beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays. Focus on the 
scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course it isn't as 
interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then there's no 
accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured in Consciousness 
do you think? 
 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to know about 
what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the foggiest idea how 
revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and ridicule that have been 
directed her way. 
 

Share spewed:
 turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of herself 
that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone with such a 
reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty, posts ridiculing 
me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with 
tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. 
I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by 
her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
   Hey, I didn't write it. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 


 
 
 

 
 





 
 
 
 










 




RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
Share, you got one thing right: Your post does justify the criticism and 
ridicule directed at you.
 

 You completely missed the rest of my point. And that, of course, simply 
reinforces the justification for the criticism and ridicule.
 

 I won't explain any further. I'll just leave you to ponder what I'm talking 
about. Think of it as a koan, 'K?
 

 Share blubbered:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing post 
  that Ann wrote. 
  Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or perhaps at this point she's 
  simply totally 
  self deluded about her alleged honesty. 
 
 Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the MGC has 
 directed at me 
  over the past year. 

 Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm pandering. But 
 if I stand up to 
  their ridicule, then according to her, I deserved it retroactively!

 This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's so 
 desperate to 
  present herself as.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@... 
awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
   That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also 
looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by the 
pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays. Focus on 
the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course it isn't as 
interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then there's no 
accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured in Consciousness 
do you think? 
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to know about 
what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the foggiest idea how 
revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and ridicule that have been 
directed her way. 
 

Share spewed:
 turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of herself 
that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone with such a 
reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty, posts ridiculing 
me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with 
tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. 
I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by 
her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
   Hey, I didn't write it. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 


 
 
 

 






 
 
 
 










 
 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread TurquoiseB
Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
them.

You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
happen.

YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
And, of course, it worked.

So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
grudges -- could be appealed to.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

 Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
alleged honesty.

 Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
MGC has directed at me over the past year.

 Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I
deserved it retroactively!

 This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's
so desperate to present herself as.





 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@...
awoelflebater@... wrote:

 That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also
looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by
the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays.
Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course
it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then
there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured
in Consciousness do you think?Â


 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@ wrote:


 And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and
ridicule that have been directed her way.Â


 Share spewed:

 turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of
herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone
with such a reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty,
posts ridiculing me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO,
an SS commando with tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental
eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman
has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty posts towards me, I'd
say that's quite true of Ann and her face.





 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@ wrote:

 Â
 Hey, I didn't write it.


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.htm\
l





RE: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: A story of devotion

2013-11-20 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of dhamiltony...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 7:16 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: A story of devotion

 

  

“Yahoo Groups, in its sole discretion, may terminate or remove any content, 
Group or your Yahoo ID immediately and without notice if (a) Yahoo believes 
that you have acted inconsistently with the spirit or the letter of the Yahoo 
Terms of Service or the Yahoo Groups Guidelines, or (b) Yahoo believes you have 
violated or tried to violate the rights of others. Please help us keep Yahoo 
Groups an enjoyable and positive experience. If you see a Group or content that 
violates our rules, please let us know.”  

He has been banned. Let me know if he resurfaces.





Yes. This here is about the survival of our FFL list. 





Dear FFL, now more clearly than even before it is getting to be time to avert 
the danger of ultimate termination to our FFL group community before it becomes 
too late. Shutting the Fairfieldlife forum down has been tried by subversion 
like this before. We must act to protect ourselves. I call upon the moderation 
of this community to close the membership of this hooligan 
'indifferent_netizen' masquerading such hateful thought on the pages of our FFL.

-Buck 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@...  wrote:

Why on Earth (or perhaps why in Hell) did you pick the handle 
'indifferent_netizen'? It almost seems more applicable as a name for me, as 
portrayed by you, than for you.

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
indifferent_netizen wrote:

Don't be so retarded Xeno.

My confronting and humiliating emotionally stunted like you and emptybill 
doesn't taint the beauty, the intelligence, the love, sensitivity - the amazing 
awesomeness of my personal consciousness.

Don't confuse what I do with who I am. I suppose that's why you are retarded :-)



 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@...  wrote:

If you cannot see some beauty in everything, what does that say about you?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
Indifferent_Netizen wrote:

Can you please quote something original empty baby?

Any unique insight of yours?

And then there's no beauty in your soul, nothing attractive - just an 
emotionally, psychologically stunted person who parrots others and has to latch 
on to others.

You think some bigoted buddhist trailer trash bitch qualifies as Devi? OMG how 
hilarious Bill - how clueless and retarded you are. For a long time I ignored 
you, because I was well aware of your emotional disability - this time you have 
a crossed a line with the level of your dishonesty.


Do me a favor - just keep Willytex under control - you hear me? He's a good 
match for your intellectual and emotional abilities.

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com  wrote:

Oh The Bigoted Buddhist Trailer Trash Billy Boy is frothing at the mouth again?

But not your parroted sutras on Mysticism and Enlightenment this time is it?

What a worthless piece of shit you are - no sensitivity, no intelligent, no 
heart, no awareness of your behavior, your dishonesty - just a constant choking 
on parroted vomit you dumb emotionally, psychologically retarded motherfucker. 

You disgust me Bill.

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@...  wrote:

Xenos means stranger - so by definition you don't know anything about him. You 
are just an idiot. 

 

You are nothing but a troll here so there is no reason for him to listen to any 
comment you might make. Trolls like you are a dime a dozen in bhajan halls.  

 

You are not a brahmana but just a malicious dog-eater trying to shit upon this 
forum. Go back into the ether to your other rakshasa-s. Chandalas like you are 
unworthy of human form. 

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com , 
no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com  wrote:

OMG why do I feel so much contempt and disgust for cold, heartless bastards 
like Xeno, emptybill, Rick et al..?

 

I have more respect for my ex, even if she were ultimately delusional. She sang 
the bhajans so beautifully, with so much devotion that she cried, not to 
mention how beautiful she was. She would always tell me that one should cry for 
God, and I would stare at her like Xeno would - that is when I was trouble 
expressing emotion but I was young, only 25.

 

What a shame then, these emotionally retarded 60 year olds - the Xenos, the 
Bigoted Bills, the Ricks.

 

Xeno - you listening - you psychopath?

 

[FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread sharelong60
turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
 And, of course, it worked.
 
 So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
 have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
 grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
 post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
 perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
 alleged honesty.
 
  Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
 MGC has directed at me over the past year.
 
  Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
 pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I
 deserved it retroactively!
 
  This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's
 so desperate to present herself as.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@...
 awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
  That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also
 looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by
 the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays.
 Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course
 it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then
 there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured
 in Consciousness do you think?Â
 
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
  authfriend@ wrote:
 
 
  And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
 know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
 foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and
 ridicule that have been directed her way.Â
 
 
  Share spewed:
 
  turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of
 herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone
 with such a reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty,
 posts ridiculing me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO,
 an SS commando with tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental
 eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman
 has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty posts towards me, I'd
 say that's quite true of Ann and her face.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@ wrote:
 
  Â
  Hey, I didn't write it.
 
 
 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.htm\ 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.htm\
 l
  



[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
Oh, I'm delighted to acknowledge Ann's post. I thought it was absolutely 
hilarious and totally nailed you and Richard.
 

 Ask your great pal Barry, he'll tell you how important it is to be able to 
laugh at yourself. According to him, it's only excessive ego that gets in the 
way. (And he should know--I haven't known him to be able to laugh at himself 
ever).
 

 Share whined:
 
  turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
  thread What I Did Today. She's 
  very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither 
  she nor Judy has the integrity to 
  acknowledge this other post.

 





[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread awoelflebater
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, I saw your photo after I read your post ridiculing me so your Politically 
Correct answers are wasted on me. Like the one you foisted on Ravi about why 
you didn't meet with him in person. He's still simpering after you and calling 
you dear Ann all the time so I guess you were successful in that instance. And 
if you really wanted to send me a photo of the scenery, why didn't you? Are you 
really telling me that your photographer husband didn't take any of just the 
scenery?!
 

 See later post of two pictures for you of just the scenery. If I had any clue 
that this photo of mine would have elicited such a fascinating response from 
you I would have posted an album's worth! Your response spoke volumes to me and 
I couldn't even see your angelic face.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

 That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also looking 
at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by the pristine 
beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays. Focus on the 
scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course it isn't as 
interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then there's no 
accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured in Consciousness 
do you think? 
 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to know about 
what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the foggiest idea how 
revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and ridicule that have been 
directed her way. 
 

Share spewed:
 turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of herself 
that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone with such a 
reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty, posts ridiculing 
me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with 
tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. 
I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by 
her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
   Hey, I didn't write it. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 


 
 
 

 
 





 
 
 
 










 






Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Gosh, Ann, you're always criticizing me for allegedly not having self respect 
and standing up to people. Oh, I guess you meant just turq! 





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:25 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com 
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Ann, I saw your photo after I read your post ridiculing me so your Politically 
Correct answers are wasted on me. Like the one you foisted on Ravi about why 
you didn't meet with him in person. He's still simpering after you and calling 
you dear Ann all the time so I guess you were successful in that instance. And 
if you really wanted to send me a photo of the scenery, why didn't you? Are you 
really telling me that your photographer husband didn't take any of just the 
scenery?!

See later post of two pictures for you of just the scenery. If I had any clue 
that this photo of mine would have elicited such a fascinating response from 
you I would have posted an album's worth! Your response spoke volumes to me and 
I couldn't even see your angelic face.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:


That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also looking 
at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by the pristine 
beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays. Focus on the 
scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course it isn't as 
interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then there's no 
accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured in Consciousness 
do you think? 



---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:


And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to know about 
what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the foggiest idea how 
revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and ridicule that have been 
directed her way. 


Share spewed:

turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of herself 
that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone with such a 
reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty, posts ridiculing 
me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with 
tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. 
I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging 
by her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.






On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
  
Hey, I didn't write it. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 







Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Yeah, Judy, this is your kind of pandering. The MGC has its very own brand of 
pandering. Mostly with each other!





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:16 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Oh, I'm delighted to acknowledge Ann's post. I thought it was absolutely 
hilarious and totally nailed you and Richard.

Ask your great pal Barry, he'll tell you how important it is to be able to 
laugh at yourself. According to him, it's only excessive ego that gets in the 
way. (And he should know--I haven't known him to be able to laugh at himself 
ever).

Share whined:


 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
 thread What I Did Today. She's 
 very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither 
 she nor Judy has the integrity to 
 acknowledge this other post.




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: What I Did Today

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Another perfect example of MGC pandering imo!




On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:46 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com 
awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Hey Em, I know. I can tell from your past posting that you love the ocean and 
the elements and the walks where the spray hits you in the face and you can 
smell the brininess of the sea. You seem to take many ocean walks and no doubt 
your dog is running with you in the sand and having a glorious time and when 
you return to your home you feel invigorated and cleansed by the stinging air 
and the exhilaration of it all. Glad you could appreciate the picture without 
gettingtoo hung up with how much I look like a Nazi. (As you would say smile.)


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:


Ann, you are my kinda girl for sure (yes, I'm heterosexual...so far at 
least...smile)I would rather be there than anywhere.   



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:


 Hey Share, here is somewhere I went this last weekend and the breakers were 
spraying salty droplets and the mist was blowing in and the sand was hard and 
wide. You can tell from my face that I am loving it.



---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Soon, Richard, I'll be going to the Whole Foods in Annapolis. They have TWO 
kinds of quinoa concoctions at the salad bar. How many different kinds of 
quinoa salad does your Whole Foods have?
PS I LOVE these photos of the different places you visit or drive by!






On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:25 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
wrote:
 
  
Tonight we went to this place:





On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... wrote:

Today I drove by this place:







On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... wrote:

This morning I went to this place:







On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... wrote:

On  the way home from the store I visited this place:








On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... wrote:

There;s a rock and roll running marathon here today and there having a 
Formula Grand Prix race up in Austin.


But, I went to this place today:









On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... wrote:

Today I went by this place. What are those people all lined up for, 
waiting for days?







On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
wrote:

Later today I drove past this place:







On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote:

 
  
There's an app for this:
https://twitter.com/

I'm sure everyone on FFL will sign up for your tweets.


On 11/15/2013 12:07 PM, Richard Williams wrote:

  
Alright, I'm back on the discussion board; sorry for the delay but I 
had to go here:: 
















[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread awoelflebater
 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
 And, of course, it worked.
 
 So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
 have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
 grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
 post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
 perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
 alleged honesty.
 
  Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
 MGC has directed at me over the past year.
 
  Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
 pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I
 deserved it retroactively!
 
  This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's
 so desperate to present herself as.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@...
 awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
  That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also
 looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by
 the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays.
 Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course
 it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then
 there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured
 in Consciousness do you think?Â
 
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
  authfriend@ wrote:
 
 
  And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
 know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
 foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and
 ridicule that have been directed her way.Â
 
 
  Share spewed:
 
  turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of
 herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone
 with such a reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty,
 posts ridiculing me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO,
 an SS commando with tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental
 eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman
 has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty posts towards me, I'd
 say that's quite true of Ann and her face.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@ wrote:
 
  Â
  Hey, I didn't write it.
 
 
 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.htm\ 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.htm\
 l
  





[FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
Barry confabulated:
 

  YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting

  antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result.

 

 Too funny. In fact it was Share who laid low Monday and Tuesday. She
 even told you she was trying to cut back on posts. Whether she did that
 because of your made-up figures, I have no idea. I can tell you for 100
 percent certain fact, though, that nobody else laid low as a result of
 those figures.
 

 Check your ego, buddy. It's delusional.
 




[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread sharelong60
No Ann, it wasn't just your photo that I replied to. It was the combo of your 
nice photo with your previous nasty post.  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, I saw your photo after I read your post ridiculing me so your Politically 
Correct answers are wasted on me. Like the one you foisted on Ravi about why 
you didn't meet with him in person. He's still simpering after you and calling 
you dear Ann all the time so I guess you were successful in that instance. And 
if you really wanted to send me a photo of the scenery, why didn't you? Are you 
really telling me that your photographer husband didn't take any of just the 
scenery?!
 

 See later post of two pictures for you of just the scenery. If I had any clue 
that this photo of mine would have elicited such a fascinating response from 
you I would have posted an album's worth! Your response spoke volumes to me and 
I couldn't even see your angelic face.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

 That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also looking 
at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by the pristine 
beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays. Focus on the 
scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course it isn't as 
interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then there's no 
accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured in Consciousness 
do you think? 
 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to know about 
what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the foggiest idea how 
revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and ridicule that have been 
directed her way. 
 

Share spewed:
 turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of herself 
that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone with such a 
reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty, posts ridiculing 
me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with 
tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore. 
I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves. Judging by 
her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann and her face.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
   Hey, I didn't write it. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.html 


 
 
 

 
 





 
 
 
 










 








RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
Let's see, now, if I acknowledge Ann's post I'm pandering, and if I don't 
acknowledge it, I have no integrity. Have I got that right?
 

 When you're in a hole, Share, stop digging. 
 
Share wailed:

  Yeah, Judy, this is your kind of pandering. The MGC has its very own brand 
  of pandering. 
  Mostly with each other!
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:16 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   Oh, I'm delighted to acknowledge Ann's post. I thought it was absolutely 
hilarious and totally nailed you and Richard.
 

 Ask your great pal Barry, he'll tell you how important it is to be able to 
laugh at yourself. According to him, it's only excessive ego that gets in the 
way. (And he should know--I haven't known him to be able to laugh at himself 
ever).
 

 Share whined:
 
  turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
  thread What I Did Today. She's 
  very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither 
  she nor Judy has the integrity to 
  acknowledge this other post.

 



 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Just like if I retort to you all after 2 days of not retorting, then I don't 
have a sense of humor. But if I don't retort, then I don't have self respect.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:38 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Let's see, now, if I acknowledge Ann's post I'm pandering, and if I don't 
acknowledge it, I have no integrity. Have I got that right?

When you're in a hole, Share, stop digging. 

Share wailed:


 Yeah, Judy, this is your kind of pandering. The MGC has its very own brand of 
 pandering. 
 Mostly with each other!





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:16 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
  
Oh, I'm delighted to acknowledge Ann's post. I thought it was absolutely 
hilarious and totally nailed you and Richard.

Ask your great pal Barry, he'll tell you how important it is to be able to 
laugh at yourself. According to him, it's only excessive ego that gets in the 
way. (And he should know--I haven't known him to be able to laugh at himself 
ever).

Share whined:


 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
 thread What I Did Today. She's 
 very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither 
 she nor Judy has the integrity to 
 acknowledge this other post.






[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread sharelong60
Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
 And, of course, it worked.
 
 So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
 have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
 grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
 post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
 perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
 alleged honesty.
 
  Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
 MGC has directed at me over the past year.
 
  Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
 pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I
 deserved it retroactively!
 
  This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's
 so desperate to present herself as.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@...
 awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
  That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also
 looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by
 the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays.
 Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course
 it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then
 there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured
 in Consciousness do you think?Â
 
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
  authfriend@ wrote:
 
 
  And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
 know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
 foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and
 ridicule that have been directed her way.Â
 
 
  Share spewed:
 
  turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of
 herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone
 with such a reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty,
 posts ridiculing me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO,
 an SS commando with tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental
 eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman
 has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty posts towards me, I'd
 say that's quite true of Ann and her face.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@ wrote:
 
  Â
  Hey, I didn't write it.
 
 
 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.htm\ 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/science/a-cold-war-fought-by-women.htm\
 l
  







Re: [FairfieldLife] MyFace

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Richard, I posted my photo some time ago. BTW, thanks for photo of Whole Foods 
fruits and nuts (-:
Also thanks for *have a day* cute post. 





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:20 AM, Richard J. Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  
Now this is funny - according to my webpage counter, seven people visited the 
MyFace page, but not one submitted a photo of their face. LoL!

http://www.rwilliams.us/myface/

On 10/31/2013 11:43 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:

Thanks for the comment on my face, but you don't seem to have included an 
attached photo of your own. Go figure.

So, I guess we know who at least one troll, since you visited
the site at least twice using a Linux machine, according to my
IP recording script. 

P.S. Just because you may not have any hair or many teeth left,
doesn't mean yours would be the only image with that in common. 

On 10/31/2013 10:49 AM, Bhairitu wrote:

  
So you do look like  a troll.  Which Austin bridge was that taken under? :-D 

On 10/30/2013 08:32 AM, Richard Williams wrote:

  
You've heard of 'My Space'. And, you've heard of 'Facebook'. My new social 
networking site will be called 'My Face'.

Just post pictures of your face, nothing else, and
  then post comments about each others face. 
  Everyone loves to make comments about other
  people's face.  Don't know HTML? Send me a photo
  of your face along with your real name and I'll
  put up it  up on the web for you. It will be fun
  and I'll be a millionaire in a year or two. Don't
  be shy just because you've got no hair or teeth
  left. LoL!


  

http://www.rwilliams.us/myface/








[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: What I Did Today

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
Ah ha ha, Ann.  I want those boots you were wearing.  Yes, I love the ocean; 
puts things back in a perspective that I find ultimately humbling, nurturing 
and yes, cleansing, no matter what the weather. In the winter, I like it when 
the wind rips through me and the rain cries tears down my face and the little 
dog doggedly trots forward.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

 Hey Em, I know. I can tell from your past posting that you love the ocean and 
the elements and the walks where the spray hits you in the face and you can 
smell the brininess of the sea. You seem to take many ocean walks and no doubt 
your dog is running with you in the sand and having a glorious time and when 
you return to your home you feel invigorated and cleansed by the stinging air 
and the exhilaration of it all. Glad you could appreciate the picture without 
getting too hung up with how much I look like a Nazi. (As you would say 
smile.)
 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Ann, you are my kinda girl for sure (yes, I'm heterosexual...so far at 
least...smile)I would rather be there than anywhere.   
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  Hey Share, here is somewhere I went this last weekend and the breakers were 
spraying salty droplets and the mist was blowing in and the sand was hard and 
wide. You can tell from my face that I am loving it.
 
 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Soon, Richard, I'll be going to the Whole Foods in Annapolis. They have TWO 
kinds of quinoa concoctions at the salad bar. How many different kinds of 
quinoa salad does your Whole Foods have?
PS I LOVE these photos of the different places you visit or drive by!
 

 
 
 On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:25 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... wrote:
 
   Tonight we went to this place:
 


 

 On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Today I drove by this place: 

 


 

 On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 This morning I went to this place: 

 
 

 

 On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 On  the way home from the store I visited this place:
 

 


 
 
 On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 There;s a rock and roll running marathon here today and there having a Formula 
Grand Prix race up in Austin. 

 But, I went to this place today:
 

 
 
 


 

 On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Today I went by this place. What are those people all lined up for, waiting 
for days? 

 


 

 On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Later today I drove past this place: 

 


 

 On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... 
wrote:
   
 There's an app for this:
 https://twitter.com/ https://twitter.com/
 
 I'm sure everyone on FFL will sign up for your tweets. 
 
 On 11/15/2013 12:07 PM, Richard Williams wrote:
 

   Alright, I'm back on the discussion board; sorry for the delay but I had to 
go here:: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




 




 




 




 




 




 





 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 



 



 




RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
WTF are you talking about!? Man, are you out of it. Try banging your head 
against the wall a few times, see if that jangles your synapses back into some 
sort of functioning order.
 
Share hallucinated:

  Just like if I retort to you all after 2 days of not retorting, then I don't 
  have a 
  sense of humor. But if I don't retort, then I don't have self respect.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   Let's see, now, if I acknowledge Ann's post I'm pandering, and if I don't 
acknowledge it, I have no integrity. Have I got that right?
 

 When you're in a hole, Share, stop digging. 
 
Share wailed:

  Yeah, Judy, this is your kind of pandering. The MGC has its very own brand 
  of pandering. 
  Mostly with each other!
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:16 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   Oh, I'm delighted to acknowledge Ann's post. I thought it was absolutely 
hilarious and totally nailed you and Richard.
 

 Ask your great pal Barry, he'll tell you how important it is to be able to 
laugh at yourself. According to him, it's only excessive ego that gets in the 
way. (And he should know--I haven't known him to be able to laugh at himself 
ever).
 

 Share whined:
 
  turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
  thread What I Did Today. She's 
  very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither 
  she nor Judy has the integrity to 
  acknowledge this other post.

 



 
 

 




 
 
 
 



 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





[FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people.
And my sense of humor is fine.


None of the three of you (I'm cutting Emily a break because she isn't
part of this latest outbreak of Junior High School nonsense) is worth
pissing on. If you're all intent upon demonstrating how petty and
idiotic you are, couldn't you possibly do it via email? Doing it here is
rather discourteous to the rest of the people on this forum, who don't
really give a shit who is winning these imaginary battles going on in
your silly, vindictive little heads.

Share, you *could* have just ignored anything Ann or Judy said about
you. But n. You had to start things up again, so that again
you're the focus of attention. I'm back to my original advice: SHUT THE
FUCK UP!


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@ wrote:

  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@ wrote:

  turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me
under the thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting
herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the
integrity to acknowledge this other post.



  Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my
intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard
about the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love
the smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges
you encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising,
rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to
psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are
not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on my
face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but
you are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and
demeanor as wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was
evident and that is also fine, as long as you are willing to admit
ownership of it. I don't blame you for despising me, I get it and I
probably deserve it but be straight for a change and own up.


  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote:

  Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You.
Not
  them.

  You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
  into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
  disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
  nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going
to
  happen.

  YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
  antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I
posted
  the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying
low
  as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
  And, of course, it worked.

  So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies
who
  have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes
and
  grudges -- could be appealed to.


  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
  
   Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty,
ridiculing
  post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
  perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
  alleged honesty.
  
   Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity
the
  MGC has directed at me over the past year.
  
   Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
  pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to
her, I
  deserved it retroactively!
  
   This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that
she's
  so desperate to present herself as.
  
  
  
  
  
   On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@
  awoelflebater@ wrote:
  
   That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm
also
  looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded
by
  the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two
birthdays.
  Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of
course
  it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but
then
  there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge
Structured
  in Consciousness do you think?Â
  
  
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@ wrote:
  
  
   And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
  know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
  foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms
and
  ridicule that have been directed her way.Â
  
  
   Share spewed:
  
   turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of
  herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone
  with such a reportedly wonderful 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Same to you, turq!





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:51 AM, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com 
wrote:
 
  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people.
And my sense of humor is fine.

None of the three of you (I'm cutting Emily a break because she isn't
part of this latest outbreak of Junior High School nonsense) is worth
pissing on. If you're all intent upon demonstrating how petty and
idiotic you are, couldn't you possibly do it via email? Doing it here is
rather discourteous to the rest of the people on this forum, who don't
really give a shit who is winning these imaginary battles going on in
your silly, vindictive little heads.

Share, you *could* have just ignored anything Ann or Judy said about
you. But n. You had to start things up again, so that again
you're the focus of attention. I'm back to my original advice: SHUT THE
FUCK UP!

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@ wrote:

  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@ wrote:

  turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me
under the thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting
herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the
integrity to acknowledge this other post.



  Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my
intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard
about the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love
the smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges
you encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising,
rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to
psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are
not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on my
face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but
you are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and
demeanor as wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was
evident and that is also fine, as long as you are willing to admit
ownership of it. I don't blame you for despising me, I get it and I
probably deserve it but be straight for a change and own up.


  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote:

  Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You.
Not
  them.

  You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
  into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
  disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
  nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going
to
  happen.

  YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
  antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I
posted
  the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying
low
  as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
  And, of course, it worked.

  So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies
who
  have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes
and
  grudges -- could be appealed to.


  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
  
   Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty,
ridiculing
  post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
  perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
  alleged honesty.
  
   Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity
the
  MGC has directed at me over the past year.
  
   Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
  pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to
her, I
  deserved it retroactively!
  
   This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that
she's
  so desperate to present herself as.
  
  
  
  
  
   On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@
  awoelflebater@ wrote:
  
   That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm
also
  looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded
by
  the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two
birthdays.
  Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of
course
  it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but
then
  there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge
Structured
  in Consciousness do you think?Â
  
  
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@ wrote:
  
  
   And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
  know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
  foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms
and
  ridicule that have been directed her way.Â
  
  
   Share spewed:
  
   turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of
 

[FairfieldLife] 3 scientists from UK dispute Global Warming

2013-11-20 Thread wgm4u
And to think this is one of Obama's next big move, look at what he's done to 
our Health Care system. Even if we spend BILLIONS on climate change, the effect 
is marginal, at best. But the effect on the economy will be devastating. Clean 
natural gas is a far better course along with the new 3rd and 4th generation 
Nuclear reactors, IMHO.
  
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C35pasCr6KI 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C35pasCr6KI
  
 Also see, Pandora's promise by where environmentalists are coming out for 
Nuclear Power!
  
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDw3ET3zqxk 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDw3ET3zqxk


[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: What I Did Today

2013-11-20 Thread awoelflebater
Those are Blundstones. Australian made and veyyy comfortable for beach 
walking!! I sell them at my store. These ones are brown suede - nothing like 
Nazi boots at all.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Ah ha ha, Ann.  I want those boots you were wearing.  Yes, I love the ocean; 
puts things back in a perspective that I find ultimately humbling, nurturing 
and yes, cleansing, no matter what the weather. In the winter, I like it when 
the wind rips through me and the rain cries tears down my face and the little 
dog doggedly trots forward.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

 Hey Em, I know. I can tell from your past posting that you love the ocean and 
the elements and the walks where the spray hits you in the face and you can 
smell the brininess of the sea. You seem to take many ocean walks and no doubt 
your dog is running with you in the sand and having a glorious time and when 
you return to your home you feel invigorated and cleansed by the stinging air 
and the exhilaration of it all. Glad you could appreciate the picture without 
getting too hung up with how much I look like a Nazi. (As you would say 
smile.)
 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Ann, you are my kinda girl for sure (yes, I'm heterosexual...so far at 
least...smile)I would rather be there than anywhere.   
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  Hey Share, here is somewhere I went this last weekend and the breakers were 
spraying salty droplets and the mist was blowing in and the sand was hard and 
wide. You can tell from my face that I am loving it.
 
 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Soon, Richard, I'll be going to the Whole Foods in Annapolis. They have TWO 
kinds of quinoa concoctions at the salad bar. How many different kinds of 
quinoa salad does your Whole Foods have?
PS I LOVE these photos of the different places you visit or drive by!
 

 
 
 On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:25 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... wrote:
 
   Tonight we went to this place:
 


 

 On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Today I drove by this place: 

 


 

 On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 This morning I went to this place: 

 
 

 

 On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 On  the way home from the store I visited this place:
 

 


 
 
 On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 There;s a rock and roll running marathon here today and there having a Formula 
Grand Prix race up in Austin. 

 But, I went to this place today:
 

 
 
 


 

 On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Today I went by this place. What are those people all lined up for, waiting 
for days? 

 


 

 On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Later today I drove past this place: 

 


 

 On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... 
wrote:
   
 There's an app for this:
 https://twitter.com/ https://twitter.com/
 
 I'm sure everyone on FFL will sign up for your tweets. 
 
 On 11/15/2013 12:07 PM, Richard Williams wrote:
 

   Alright, I'm back on the discussion board; sorry for the delay but I had to 
go here:: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




 




 




 




 




 




 





 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 



 



 






[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
I take it back, Share. Don't stop digging. Show us how deep you can dig. Amaze 
us with how far you can get from reality, how oblivious you can be of your own 
behavior.
 

 Share fretted:
 
  Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
  sense of humor is fine. 

 

 Actually, Ann didn't say anything about your sense of humor, but I will: 
It's--well, let's just say it's seriously limited.
 

 Ann's ridiculing of people actually isn't nasty. It's clever and funny and 
devastatingly accurate. Let's have a look at the post you're so freaked out 
about (your post that it's making fun of is underneath):
 

 Ann wrote:
 

 Me too, me too (squeal!). How many types of granola does YOUR Whole Foods 
carry Richard? Are some made with hemp and are some organic? I just love 
organic hemp granola, don't you? I hope you'll post more pictures from your 
part of the world, I find them so uplifting, so refreshing. They are like a 
little part of yourself which is sacred and infinite and beautiful. How do you 
think granola relates to Arjuna? I kind of envision the Mahbharata would have 
been so much more interesting if it had included those warriors munching on 
granola as they approached the Kauravas to do battle. 
 

 

 Share wrote:
 

 Soon, Richard, I'll be going to the Whole Foods in Annapolis. They have TWO 
kinds of quinoa concoctions at the salad bar. How many different kinds of 
quinoa salad does your Whole Foods have?
 PS I LOVE these photos of the different places you visit or drive by!
 
Fact is, Share, you're so upset because Ann's parody of your nitwit pandering 
to Richard is so dead on.
 

 And just for the record, here's the part of Ann's current post that you are 
carefully avoiding (the bolding is mine): You claim to love the smorgasbord 
that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who 
is exempt from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or 
downright verbal abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? 
NO ONE. I am sorry if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your 
interesting take on my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the 
image space BTW) but you are certainly welcome to your opinion about my 
Nazi-like stance and demeanor as wrong as I think it may be. However, your 
hostility was evident and that is also fine, as long as you are willing to 
admit ownership of it. I don't blame you for despising me, I get it and I 
probably deserve it but be straight for a change and own up.
 

 









RE: [FairfieldLife] 3 scientists from UK dispute Global Warming

2013-11-20 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of wgm4u
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:01 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] 3 scientists from UK dispute Global Warming

 

  

And to think this is one of Obama's next big move, look at what he's done to 
our Health Care system. 

He should have fought for single payer, which is what he wanted in the first 
place. 

Even if we spend BILLIONS on climate change, the effect is marginal, at best. 

It is if we do dumb things like plant more corn to produce ethanol, but if we 
mounted a moonshot effort to develop intelligent, sustainable technologies, it 
would be great for the economy, and would change the politics of the middle 
east. If we factored military and environmental costs into fossil fuel 
energies, their cost would be prohibitive and would make sustainable energies 
very competitive.

But the effect on the economy will be devastating. Clean natural gas is a far 
better course 

There is no such thing. Watch Gasland: http://www.gaslandthemovie.com/

along with the new 3rd and 4th generation Nuclear reactors, IMHO.

What do you do with the spent fuel?

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C35pasCr6KI

 

Also see, Pandora's promise by where environmentalists are coming out for 
Nuclear Power!

They should move to Fukishima.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDw3ET3zqxk





[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
Fact is, folks, Barry's loving this because it gives him opportunities to put 
women down.
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
wrote:
 
  Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people.
 And my sense of humor is fine.
 
 
 None of the three of you (I'm cutting Emily a break because she isn't
 part of this latest outbreak of Junior High School nonsense) is worth
 pissing on. If you're all intent upon demonstrating how petty and
 idiotic you are, couldn't you possibly do it via email? Doing it here is
 rather discourteous to the rest of the people on this forum, who don't
 really give a shit who is winning these imaginary battles going on in
 your silly, vindictive little heads.
 
 Share, you *could* have just ignored anything Ann or Judy said about
 you. But n. You had to start things up again, so that again
 you're the focus of attention. I'm back to my original advice: SHUT THE
 FUCK UP!
 
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
  awoelflebater@ wrote:
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
  sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me
 under the thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting
 herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the
 integrity to acknowledge this other post.
 
 
 
  Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my
 intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard
 about the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love
 the smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges
 you encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising,
 rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to
 psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are
 not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on my
 face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but
 you are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and
 demeanor as wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was
 evident and that is also fine, as long as you are willing to admit
 ownership of it. I don't blame you for despising me, I get it and I
 probably deserve it but be straight for a change and own up.
 
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
  turquoiseb@ wrote:
 
  Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You.
 Not
  them.
 
  You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
  into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
  disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
  nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going
 to
  happen.
 
  YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
  antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I
 posted
  the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying
 low
  as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
  And, of course, it worked.
 
  So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies
 who
  have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes
 and
  grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
  
   Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty,
 ridiculing
  post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
  perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
  alleged honesty.
  
   Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity
 the
  MGC has directed at me over the past year.
  
   Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
  pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to
 her, I
  deserved it retroactively!
  
   This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that
 she's
  so desperate to present herself as.
  
  
  
  
  
   On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@
  awoelflebater@ wrote:
  
   That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm
 also
  looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded
 by
  the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two
 birthdays.
  Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of
 course
  it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but
 then
  there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge
 Structured
  in Consciousness do you think?Â
  
  
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 

[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: What I Did Today

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
Oh, excellent!  I was just thinking that I need a pair of new and different 
boots for walking in the winter.  Ask and you shall receive.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

 Those are Blundstones. Australian made and veyyy comfortable for beach 
walking!! I sell them at my store. These ones are brown suede - nothing like 
Nazi boots at all.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Ah ha ha, Ann.  I want those boots you were wearing.  Yes, I love the ocean; 
puts things back in a perspective that I find ultimately humbling, nurturing 
and yes, cleansing, no matter what the weather. In the winter, I like it when 
the wind rips through me and the rain cries tears down my face and the little 
dog doggedly trots forward.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

 Hey Em, I know. I can tell from your past posting that you love the ocean and 
the elements and the walks where the spray hits you in the face and you can 
smell the brininess of the sea. You seem to take many ocean walks and no doubt 
your dog is running with you in the sand and having a glorious time and when 
you return to your home you feel invigorated and cleansed by the stinging air 
and the exhilaration of it all. Glad you could appreciate the picture without 
getting too hung up with how much I look like a Nazi. (As you would say 
smile.)
 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Ann, you are my kinda girl for sure (yes, I'm heterosexual...so far at 
least...smile)I would rather be there than anywhere.   
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  Hey Share, here is somewhere I went this last weekend and the breakers were 
spraying salty droplets and the mist was blowing in and the sand was hard and 
wide. You can tell from my face that I am loving it.
 
 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Soon, Richard, I'll be going to the Whole Foods in Annapolis. They have TWO 
kinds of quinoa concoctions at the salad bar. How many different kinds of 
quinoa salad does your Whole Foods have?
PS I LOVE these photos of the different places you visit or drive by!
 

 
 
 On Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:25 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... wrote:
 
   Tonight we went to this place:
 


 

 On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Today I drove by this place: 

 


 

 On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 This morning I went to this place: 

 
 

 

 On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 On  the way home from the store I visited this place:
 

 


 
 
 On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 There;s a rock and roll running marathon here today and there having a Formula 
Grand Prix race up in Austin. 

 But, I went to this place today:
 

 
 
 


 

 On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Today I went by this place. What are those people all lined up for, waiting 
for days? 

 


 

 On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Richard Williams punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 Later today I drove past this place: 

 


 

 On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... 
wrote:
   
 There's an app for this:
 https://twitter.com/ https://twitter.com/
 
 I'm sure everyone on FFL will sign up for your tweets. 
 
 On 11/15/2013 12:07 PM, Richard Williams wrote:
 

   Alright, I'm back on the discussion board; sorry for the delay but I had to 
go here:: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




 




 




 




 




 




 





 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 



 



 








RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
Attagirl. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Same to you, turq!
 
 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:51 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote:
 
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
 
  Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people.
 And my sense of humor is fine.
 
 None of the three of you (I'm cutting Emily a break because she isn't
 part of this latest outbreak of Junior High School nonsense) is worth
 pissing on. If you're all intent upon demonstrating how petty and
 idiotic you are, couldn't you possibly do it via email? Doing it here is
 rather discourteous to the rest of the people on this forum, who don't
 really give a shit who is winning these imaginary battles going on in
 your silly, vindictive little heads.
 
 Share, you *could* have just ignored anything Ann or Judy said about
 you. But n. You had to start things up again, so that again
 you're the focus of attention. I'm back to my original advice: SHUT THE
 FUCK UP!
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@ wrote:
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me
 under the thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting
 herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the
 integrity to acknowledge this other post.
 
 
 
  Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my
 intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard
 about the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love
 the smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges
 you encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising,
 rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to
 psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are
 not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on my
 face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but
 you are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and
 demeanor as wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was
 evident and that is also fine, as long as you are willing to admit
 ownership of it. I don't blame you for despising me, I get it and I
 probably deserve it but be straight for a change and own up.
 
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote:
 
  Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You.
 Not
  them.
 
  You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
  into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
  disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
  nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going
 to
  happen.
 
  YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
  antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I
 posted
  the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying
 low
  as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
  And, of course, it worked.
 
  So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies
 who
  have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes
 and
  grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
  
   Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty,
 ridiculing
  post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
  perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
  alleged honesty.
  
   Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity
 the
  MGC has directed at me over the past year.
  
   Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
  pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to
 her, I
  deserved it retroactively!
  
   This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that
 she's
  so desperate to present herself as.
  
  
  
  
  
   On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@
  awoelflebater@ wrote:
  
   That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm
 also
  looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded
 by
  the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two
 birthdays.
  Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of
 course
  it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but
 then
  there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge
 Structured
  in Consciousness do you think?Â
  
  
   ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@ wrote:
  
  
   And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
  know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
  foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms
 and
  

[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. Your 
writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
 And, of course, it worked.
 
 So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
 have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
 grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
 post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
 perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
 alleged honesty.
 
  Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
 MGC has directed at me over the past year.
 
  Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
 pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I
 deserved it retroactively!
 
  This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's
 so desperate to present herself as.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@...
 awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
  That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also
 looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by
 the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays.
 Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course
 it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then
 there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured
 in Consciousness do you think?Â
 
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
  authfriend@ wrote:
 
 
  And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
 know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
 foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and
 ridicule that have been directed her way.Â
 
 
  Share spewed:
 
  turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of
 herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone
 with such a reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty,
 posts ridiculing me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO,
 an SS commando with tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental
 eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman
 has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty posts towards me, I'd
 say that's quite true of Ann and her face.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:45 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@ wrote:
 
  Â
  Hey, I didn't 

RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
This is so humorous.  Share, your choice of context today is so off the mark.  
Stop being paranoid and get out of the house!
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Let's see, now, if I acknowledge Ann's post I'm pandering, and if I don't 
acknowledge it, I have no integrity. Have I got that right?
 

 When you're in a hole, Share, stop digging. 
 
Share wailed:

  Yeah, Judy, this is your kind of pandering. The MGC has its very own brand 
  of pandering. 
  Mostly with each other!
 

 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:16 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   Oh, I'm delighted to acknowledge Ann's post. I thought it was absolutely 
hilarious and totally nailed you and Richard.
 

 Ask your great pal Barry, he'll tell you how important it is to be able to 
laugh at yourself. According to him, it's only excessive ego that gets in the 
way. (And he should know--I haven't known him to be able to laugh at himself 
ever).
 

 Share whined:
 
  turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
  thread What I Did Today. She's 
  very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither 
  she nor Judy has the integrity to 
  acknowledge this other post.

 



 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: A story of devotion

2013-11-20 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Yes, to protect the very existence of our FFL community group we should close 
the membership at least of 'indifferent_netizen'/ or whoever that is here, 
before Yahoo catches up with us as a group for tolerating these kinds of unkind 
posts. There is a very real and present danger to the whole FFL group letting 
this writer and some of these other people write their hateful unkind abusive 
speech here.  It is time. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:

 “Yahoo Groups, in its sole discretion, may terminate or remove any content, 
Group or your Yahoo ID immediately and without notice if (a) Yahoo believes 
that you have acted inconsistently with the spirit or the letter of the Yahoo 
Terms of Service or the Yahoo Groups Guidelines, or (b) Yahoo believes you have 
violated or tried to violate the rights of others. Please help us keep Yahoo 
Groups an enjoyable and positive experience. If you see a Group or content that 
violates our rules, please let us know.”  
 


 Yes. This here is about the survival of our FFL list. 
 


 Dear FFL, now more clearly than even before it is getting to be time to avert 
the danger of ultimate termination to our FFL group community before it becomes 
too late. Shutting the Fairfieldlife forum down has been tried by subversion 
like this before. We must act to protect ourselves. I call upon the moderation 
of this community to close the membership of this hooligan 
'indifferent_netizen' masquerading such hateful thought on the pages of our FFL.
 -Buck 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:

 Why on Earth (or perhaps why in Hell) did you pick the handle 
'indifferent_netizen'? It almost seems more applicable as a name for me, as 
portrayed by you, than for you.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, indifferent_netizen wrote:

 Don't be so retarded Xeno.

My confronting and humiliating emotionally stunted like you and emptybill 
doesn't taint the beauty, the intelligence, the love, sensitivity - the amazing 
awesomeness of my personal consciousness.

Don't confuse what I do with who I am. I suppose that's why you are retarded :-)


 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:

 If you cannot see some beauty in everything, what does that say about you?


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Indifferent_Netizen wrote:

 Can you please quote something original empty baby?

Any unique insight of yours?

And then there's no beauty in your soul, nothing attractive - just an 
emotionally, psychologically stunted person who parrots others and has to latch 
on to others.

You think some bigoted buddhist trailer trash bitch qualifies as Devi? OMG how 
hilarious Bill - how clueless and retarded you are. For a long time I ignored 
you, because I was well aware of your emotional disability - this time you have 
a crossed a line with the level of your dishonesty.


Do me a favor - just keep Willytex under control - you hear me? He's a good 
match for your intellectual and emotional abilities.

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Oh The Bigoted Buddhist Trailer Trash Billy Boy is frothing at the mouth again?

But not your parroted sutras on Mysticism and Enlightenment this time is it?

What a worthless piece of shit you are - no sensitivity, no intelligent, no 
heart, no awareness of your behavior, your dishonesty - just a constant choking 
on parroted vomit you dumb emotionally, psychologically retarded motherfucker. 

You disgust me Bill.

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote:

 Xenos means stranger - so by definition you don't know anything about him. You 
are just an idiot. 

 

 You are nothing but a troll here so there is no reason for him to listen to 
any comment you might make. Trolls like you are a dime a dozen in bhajan halls. 
 
 

 You are not a brahmana but just a malicious dog-eater trying to shit upon this 
forum. Go back into the ether to your other rakshasa-s. Chandalas like you are 
unworthy of human form. 

 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 OMG why do I feel so much contempt and disgust for cold, heartless bastards 
like Xeno, emptybill, Rick et al..?
 

 I have more respect for my ex, even if she were ultimately delusional. She 
sang the bhajans so beautifully, with so much devotion that she cried, not to 
mention how beautiful she was. She would always tell me that one should cry for 
God, and I would stare at her like Xeno would - that is when I was trouble 
expressing emotion but I was young, only 25.
 

 What a shame then, these emotionally retarded 60 year olds - the Xenos, the 
Bigoted Bills, the Ricks.

 

 Xeno - you listening - you psychopath?
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 And I'm trying to imagine the cold, heartless psychopath Xeno at Amma's 
programs..LOL..I suppose I would abuse, humiliate him out of the program hall 
:-)
 

 

 

 ---In 

RE: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: A story of devotion

2013-11-20 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of dhamiltony...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:55 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: A story of 
devotion

 

  

Yes, to protect the very existence of our FFL community group we should close 
the membership at least of 'indifferent_netizen'/ or whoever that is here, 
before Yahoo catches up with us as a group for tolerating these kinds of unkind 
posts. There is a very real and present danger to the whole FFL group letting 
this writer and some of these other people write their hateful unkind abusive 
speech here.  It is time. 

Already done.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
Buck wrote:

“Yahoo Groups, in its sole discretion, may terminate or remove any content, 
Group or your Yahoo ID immediately and without notice if (a) Yahoo believes 
that you have acted inconsistently with the spirit or the letter of the Yahoo 
Terms of Service or the Yahoo Groups Guidelines, or (b) Yahoo believes you have 
violated or tried to violate the rights of others. Please help us keep Yahoo 
Groups an enjoyable and positive experience. If you see a Group or content that 
violates our rules, please let us know.”  





Yes. This here is about the survival of our FFL list. 





Dear FFL, now more clearly than even before it is getting to be time to avert 
the danger of ultimate termination to our FFL group community before it becomes 
too late. Shutting the Fairfieldlife forum down has been tried by subversion 
like this before. We must act to protect ourselves. I call upon the moderation 
of this community to close the membership of this hooligan 
'indifferent_netizen' masquerading such hateful thought on the pages of our FFL.

-Buck 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@...  wrote:

Why on Earth (or perhaps why in Hell) did you pick the handle 
'indifferent_netizen'? It almost seems more applicable as a name for me, as 
portrayed by you, than for you.

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
indifferent_netizen wrote:

Don't be so retarded Xeno.

My confronting and humiliating emotionally stunted like you and emptybill 
doesn't taint the beauty, the intelligence, the love, sensitivity - the amazing 
awesomeness of my personal consciousness.

Don't confuse what I do with who I am. I suppose that's why you are retarded :-)



 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
anartaxius@... mailto:anartaxius@...  wrote:

If you cannot see some beauty in everything, what does that say about you?

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
Indifferent_Netizen wrote:

Can you please quote something original empty baby?

Any unique insight of yours?

And then there's no beauty in your soul, nothing attractive - just an 
emotionally, psychologically stunted person who parrots others and has to latch 
on to others.

You think some bigoted buddhist trailer trash bitch qualifies as Devi? OMG how 
hilarious Bill - how clueless and retarded you are. For a long time I ignored 
you, because I was well aware of your emotional disability - this time you have 
a crossed a line with the level of your dishonesty.


Do me a favor - just keep Willytex under control - you hear me? He's a good 
match for your intellectual and emotional abilities.

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com  wrote:

Oh The Bigoted Buddhist Trailer Trash Billy Boy is frothing at the mouth again?

But not your parroted sutras on Mysticism and Enlightenment this time is it?

What a worthless piece of shit you are - no sensitivity, no intelligent, no 
heart, no awareness of your behavior, your dishonesty - just a constant choking 
on parroted vomit you dumb emotionally, psychologically retarded motherfucker. 

You disgust me Bill.

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@...  wrote:

Xenos means stranger - so by definition you don't know anything about him. You 
are just an idiot. 

 

You are nothing but a troll here so there is no reason for him to listen to any 
comment you might make. Trolls like you are a dime a dozen in bhajan halls.  

 

You are not a brahmana but just a malicious dog-eater trying to shit upon this 
forum. Go back into the ether to your other rakshasa-s. Chandalas like you are 
unworthy of human form. 

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com , 
no_re...@yahoogroups.com mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com  wrote:

OMG why do I feel so much contempt and disgust for cold, heartless bastards 
like Xeno, emptybill, Rick et al..?

 

I have more respect for 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE:yes it time to delete such mbrs here

2013-11-20 Thread wleed3
YES




In a message dated 11/20/13 12:54:59 Eastern Standard Time, 
dhamiltony...@yahoo.com writes:



Yes, to protect the very existence of our FFL community group we should close 
the membership at least of 'indifferent_netizen'/ or whoever that is here, 
before Yahoo catches up with us as a group for tolerating these kinds of unkind 
posts. There is a very real and present danger to the whole FFL group letting 
this writer and some of these other people write their hateful unkind abusive 
speech here.  It is time. 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:


“Yahoo Groups, in its sole discretion, may terminate or remove any content, 
Group or your Yahoo ID immediately and without notice if (a) Yahoo believes 
that you have acted inconsistently with the spirit or the letter of the Yahoo 
Terms of Service or the Yahoo Groups Guidelines, or (b) Yahoo believes you have 
violated or tried to violate the rights of others. Please help us keep Yahoo 
Groups an enjoyable and positive experience. If you see a Group or content that 
violates our rules, please let us know.”  




Yes. This here is about the survival of our FFL list. 




Dear FFL, now more clearly than even before it is getting to be time to avert 
the danger of ultimate termination to our FFL group community before it becomes 
too late. Shutting the Fairfieldlife forum down has been tried by subversion 
like this before. We must act to protect ourselves. I call upon the moderation 
of this community to close the membership of this hooligan 
'indifferent_netizen' masquerading such hateful thought on the pages of our FFL.
-Buck 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:


Why on Earth (or perhaps why in Hell) did you pick the handle 
'indifferent_netizen'? It almost seems more applicable as a name for me, as 
portrayed by you, than for you.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, indifferent_netizen wrote:


Don't be so retarded Xeno.

My confronting and humiliating emotionally stunted like you and emptybill 
doesn't taint the beauty, the intelligence, the love, sensitivity - the amazing 
awesomeness of my personal consciousness.

Don't confuse what I do with who I am. I suppose that's why you are retarded :-)








---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:


If you cannot see some beauty in everything, what does that say about you?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Indifferent_Netizen wrote:


Can you please quote something original empty baby?

Any unique insight of yours?

And then there's no beauty in your soul, nothing attractive - just an 
emotionally, psychologically stunted person who parrots others and has to latch 
on to others.

You think some bigoted buddhist trailer trash bitch qualifies as Devi? OMG how 
hilarious Bill - how clueless and retarded you are. For a long time I ignored 
you, because I was well aware of your emotional disability - this time you have 
a crossed a line with the level of your dishonesty.


Do me a favor - just keep Willytex under control - you hear me? He's a good 
match for your intellectual and emotional abilities.






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:


Oh The Bigoted Buddhist Trailer Trash Billy Boy is frothing at the mouth again?

But not your parroted sutras on Mysticism and Enlightenment this time is it?

What a worthless piece of shit you are - no sensitivity, no intelligent, no 
heart, no awareness of your behavior, your dishonesty - just a constant choking 
on parroted vomit you dumb emotionally, psychologically retarded motherfucker. 

You disgust me Bill.






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote:


Xenos means stranger - so by definition you don't know anything about him. You 
are just an idiot. 



You are nothing but a troll here so there is no reason for him to listen to any 
comment you might make. Trolls like you are a dime a dozen in bhajan halls.  


You are not a brahmana but just a malicious dog-eater trying to shit upon this 
forum. Go back into the ether to your other rakshasa-s. Chandalas like you are 
unworthy of human form. 




---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:


OMG why do I feel so much contempt and disgust for cold, heartless bastards 
like Xeno, emptybill, Rick et al..?


I have more respect for my ex, even if she were ultimately delusional. She sang 
the bhajans so beautifully, with so much devotion that she cried, not to 
mention how beautiful she was. She would always tell me that one should cry for 
God, and I would stare at her like Xeno would - that is when I was trouble 
expressing emotion but I was young, only 25.


What a shame then, these emotionally retarded 60 year olds - the Xenos, the 
Bigoted Bills, the Ricks.



Xeno - you listening - you psychopath?





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:


And I'm trying to imagine the cold, heartless psychopath Xeno at Amma's 
programs..LOL..I 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Emily, #1, you're not objective about me or Ann. #2, Ann's comments were not 
directed against you, so you really can't accurately access their alleged 
gentleness imo. Why don't you think about it?





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:39 AM, emilymae...@yahoo.com 
emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. Your 
writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:


 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely 
after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge 
this other post.



Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my 
intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about 
the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the 
smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you 
encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising, rudeness, 
misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) 
here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are not getting the support you 
had hoped for your interesting take on my face in the photo (comprising 
about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you are certainly welcome to your 
opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as wrong as I think it may be. 
However, your hostility was evident and that is also fine, as long as you are 
willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame you for despising me, I get 
it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a change and own up.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:


Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
them.

You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
happen.

YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
And, of course, it worked.

So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
grudges -- could be appealed to.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

 Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
alleged honesty.

 Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
MGC has directed at me over the past year.

 Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I
deserved it retroactively!

 This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's
so desperate to present herself as.





 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@...
awoelflebater@... wrote:

 That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also
looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by
the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays.
Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course
it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then
there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured
in Consciousness do you think?Â


 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@ wrote:


 And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and
ridicule that have been directed her way.Â


 Share spewed:

 turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of
herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone
with such a reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty,
posts ridiculing me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO,
an SS commando with tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental
eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman
has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty posts towards me, I'd

[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
In fact, Share's comments on Ann's photo were far, far nastier than anything 
Ann has ever said to her. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. Your 
writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
 And, of course, it worked.
 
 So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
 have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
 grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
 post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
 perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
 alleged honesty.
 
  Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
 MGC has directed at me over the past year.
 
  Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
 pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I
 deserved it retroactively!
 
  This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's
 so desperate to present herself as.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@...
 awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
  That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also
 looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by
 the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays.
 Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course
 it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then
 there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured
 in Consciousness do you think?Â
 
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
  authfriend@ wrote:
 
 
  And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
 know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
 foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and
 ridicule that have been directed her way.Â
 
 
  Share spewed:
 
  turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of
 herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone
 with such a reportedly wonderful life like hers could write such nasty,
 posts ridiculing me. Then I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO,
 an SS commando with tight, smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental
 eyes. I don't wonder anymore. I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman
 has the face she deserves. Judging by her nasty 

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
Share...pull up babycome on now. Put yourself in an objective party's shoes 
and try and imaging the range of perspectives that might be possible. Also, 
every post is directed at me if I want it to be, as a viewer of FFL, a public 
forum.  I'm giving you a different perspective, the one that was resonating 
within me.  It is certainly more pleasant than taking on the one that was 
resonating within you.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, #1, you're not objective about me or Ann. #2, Ann's comments were not 
directed against you, so you really can't accurately access their alleged 
gentleness imo. Why don't you think about it?
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:39 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, 
in her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. 
Your writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
 And, of course, it worked.
 
 So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
 have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
 grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
 post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
 perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
 alleged honesty.
 
  Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
 MGC has directed at me over the past year.
 
  Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
 pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I
 deserved it retroactively!
 
  This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's
 so desperate to present herself as.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@...
 awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
  That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also
 looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by
 the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays.
 Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course
 it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then
 there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured
 in Consciousness do you think?Â
 
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
  authfriend@ wrote:
 
 
  And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
 know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
 foggiest idea 

[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
I know.  Her *mean streak* came out today; way over the top.  Maybe she's 
jealous because Ann is such a beautiful human being and that was a rockin' cute 
picture.  Share just *had* to put her down; she really doesn't like women.  Too 
bad; it must be her karma that she was born one to give her the opportunity 
to learn how to love herself (Hmyet another perspective.  ha.)
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 In fact, Share's comments on Ann's photo were far, far nastier than anything 
Ann has ever said to her. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. Your 
writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
 And, of course, it worked.
 
 So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
 have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
 grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
 post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
 perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
 alleged honesty.
 
  Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
 MGC has directed at me over the past year.
 
  Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
 pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I
 deserved it retroactively!
 
  This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's
 so desperate to present herself as.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@...
 awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
  That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also
 looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by
 the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays.
 Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course
 it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then
 there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge Structured
 in Consciousness do you think?Â
 
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
  authfriend@ wrote:
 
 
  And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
 know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
 foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms and
 ridicule that have been directed her way.Â
 
 
  Share spewed:
 
  turq, coincidentally I 

[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: A story of devotion

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
Buck, why don't you and Share go have some hot hemp milk this evening before 
the Dome call - a little one-on-one, from one human being to another.  Agenda 
item No. 1: put together a plan to start another community group.  You can 
moderate and exercise your judgment re: undesirables and Share can introduce 
worthy topics and lead the discussion groups.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:

 Yes, to protect the very existence of our FFL community group we should close 
the membership at least of 'indifferent_netizen'/ or whoever that is here, 
before Yahoo catches up with us as a group for tolerating these kinds of unkind 
posts. There is a very real and present danger to the whole FFL group letting 
this writer and some of these other people write their hateful unkind abusive 
speech here.  It is time. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote:

 “Yahoo Groups, in its sole discretion, may terminate or remove any content, 
Group or your Yahoo ID immediately and without notice if (a) Yahoo believes 
that you have acted inconsistently with the spirit or the letter of the Yahoo 
Terms of Service or the Yahoo Groups Guidelines, or (b) Yahoo believes you have 
violated or tried to violate the rights of others. Please help us keep Yahoo 
Groups an enjoyable and positive experience. If you see a Group or content that 
violates our rules, please let us know.”  
 


 Yes. This here is about the survival of our FFL list. 
 


 Dear FFL, now more clearly than even before it is getting to be time to avert 
the danger of ultimate termination to our FFL group community before it becomes 
too late. Shutting the Fairfieldlife forum down has been tried by subversion 
like this before. We must act to protect ourselves. I call upon the moderation 
of this community to close the membership of this hooligan 
'indifferent_netizen' masquerading such hateful thought on the pages of our FFL.
 -Buck 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:

 Why on Earth (or perhaps why in Hell) did you pick the handle 
'indifferent_netizen'? It almost seems more applicable as a name for me, as 
portrayed by you, than for you.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, indifferent_netizen wrote:

 Don't be so retarded Xeno.

My confronting and humiliating emotionally stunted like you and emptybill 
doesn't taint the beauty, the intelligence, the love, sensitivity - the amazing 
awesomeness of my personal consciousness.

Don't confuse what I do with who I am. I suppose that's why you are retarded :-)


 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote:

 If you cannot see some beauty in everything, what does that say about you?


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Indifferent_Netizen wrote:

 Can you please quote something original empty baby?

Any unique insight of yours?

And then there's no beauty in your soul, nothing attractive - just an 
emotionally, psychologically stunted person who parrots others and has to latch 
on to others.

You think some bigoted buddhist trailer trash bitch qualifies as Devi? OMG how 
hilarious Bill - how clueless and retarded you are. For a long time I ignored 
you, because I was well aware of your emotional disability - this time you have 
a crossed a line with the level of your dishonesty.


Do me a favor - just keep Willytex under control - you hear me? He's a good 
match for your intellectual and emotional abilities.

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Oh The Bigoted Buddhist Trailer Trash Billy Boy is frothing at the mouth again?

But not your parroted sutras on Mysticism and Enlightenment this time is it?

What a worthless piece of shit you are - no sensitivity, no intelligent, no 
heart, no awareness of your behavior, your dishonesty - just a constant choking 
on parroted vomit you dumb emotionally, psychologically retarded motherfucker. 

You disgust me Bill.

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill@... wrote:

 Xenos means stranger - so by definition you don't know anything about him. You 
are just an idiot. 

 

 You are nothing but a troll here so there is no reason for him to listen to 
any comment you might make. Trolls like you are a dime a dozen in bhajan halls. 
 
 

 You are not a brahmana but just a malicious dog-eater trying to shit upon this 
forum. Go back into the ether to your other rakshasa-s. Chandalas like you are 
unworthy of human form. 

 

 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 OMG why do I feel so much contempt and disgust for cold, heartless bastards 
like Xeno, emptybill, Rick et al..?
 

 I have more respect for my ex, even if she were ultimately delusional. She 
sang the bhajans so beautifully, with so much devotion that she cried, not to 
mention how beautiful she was. She would always tell me that one should cry for 
God, and I would stare at her like Xeno would - that is when I was trouble 
expressing emotion 

[FairfieldLife] RE: Scientology super power shocker!

2013-11-20 Thread jr_esq
How come Ron Hubbard didn't resurrect from death?  That would have proved the 
validity of his super program. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Look out Fairfield, the church of $cientology has upped the ante with it's 
new super powers centre:
 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-church-of-scientologys-new-145m-complex-has-generated-more-in-fundraising-than-it-cost-8950282.html
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-church-of-scientologys-new-145m-complex-has-generated-more-in-fundraising-than-it-cost-8950282.html
 

 Apparently one can become, amongst other things, aware of awareness! Sounds 
like they are well on your patch. No mention of levitation though [maybe 
they're not *that* stupid] but they are claiming to revive the dead! we look 
forward to a new novel by Ron Hubbard shortly.




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Richard J. Williams

That was kind of a mean thing to say. LoL!

On 11/20/2013 10:49 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


WTF are you talking about!? /Man/, are you out of it. Try banging your 
head against the wall a few times, see if that jangles your synapses 
back into some sort of functioning order.



Share hallucinated:

 Just like if I retort to you all after 2 days of not retorting, then I 
don't have a

 sense of humor. But if I don't retort, then I don't have self respect.



On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:38 AM, authfriend@... 
authfriend@... wrote:
Let's see, now, if I acknowledge Ann's post I'm pandering, and if I 
don't acknowledge it, I have no integrity. Have I got that right?


When you're in a hole, Share, /stop digging/.

Share wailed:

 Yeah, Judy, this is your kind of pandering. The MGC has its very own 
brand of pandering.

 Mostly with each other!



On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 10:16 AM, authfriend@... 
authfriend@... wrote:
Oh, I'm delighted to acknowledge Ann's post. I thought it was 
absolutely hilarious and totally nailed you and Richard.


Ask your great pal Barry, he'll tell you how important it is to be 
able to laugh at yourself. According to him, it's only excessive ego 
that gets in the way. (And he should know--I haven't known him to be 
able to laugh at himself /ever/).


Share whined:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me 
under the thread What I Did Today. She's
 very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after she's been nasty. 
Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to

 acknowledge this other post.










Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Richard J. Williams

Just a reminder: Turq started this thread. LoL!

On 11/20/2013 10:51 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people.
And my sense of humor is fine.

None of the three of you (I'm cutting Emily a break because she isn't
part of this latest outbreak of Junior High School nonsense) is worth
pissing on. If you're all intent upon demonstrating how petty and
idiotic you are, couldn't you possibly do it via email? Doing it here is
rather discourteous to the rest of the people on this forum, who don't
really give a shit who is winning these imaginary battles going on in
your silly, vindictive little heads.

Share, you *could* have just ignored anything Ann or Judy said about
you. But n. You had to start things up again, so that again
you're the focus of attention. I'm back to my original advice: SHUT THE
FUCK UP!

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@ wrote:

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@ wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me
under the thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting
herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the
integrity to acknowledge this other post.



 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my
intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard
about the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love
the smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges
you encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising,
rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to
psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are
not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on my
face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but
you are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and
demeanor as wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was
evident and that is also fine, as long as you are willing to admit
ownership of it. I don't blame you for despising me, I get it and I
probably deserve it but be straight for a change and own up.


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You.
Not
 them.

 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going
to
 happen.

 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I
posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying
low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
 And, of course, it worked.

 So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies
who
 have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes
and
 grudges -- could be appealed to.


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty,
ridiculing
 post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
 perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
 alleged honesty.
 
  Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity
the
 MGC has directed at me over the past year.
 
  Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
 pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to
her, I
 deserved it retroactively!
 
  This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that
she's
 so desperate to present herself as.
 
 
 
 
 
  On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@
 awoelflebater@ wrote:
 
  That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm
also
 looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded
by
 the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two
birthdays.
 Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of
course
 it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but
then
 there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge
Structured
 in Consciousness do you think?Ã,
 
 
  ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@ wrote:
 
 
  And this post from Share tells us absolutely everything we need to
 know about what kind of human being she is. Of course she hasn't the
 foggiest idea how revealing it is of the accuracy of the criticisms
and
 ridicule that have been directed her way.Ã,
 
 
  Share spewed:
 
  turq, coincidentally I read this right after seeing the picture of
 herself that Ann posted. Lightbulb! I had been wondering why someone
 with such a 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Emily, do Obbajee and Susan count as women? Because I like them both. Ann has 
some good qualities but her ridicule and duplicity needed to be responded to, 
imo. Also imo, the MGC has itself been over the top recently. What I've noticed 
is that when I ignore you all, then one of you will butt into a fun exchange 
I'm having with someone else, in this case Richard, and proceed to poison the 
well. And of course, then it's the 3 or 4 or 5 of you against me. Seems very 
cowardly to me.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:16 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com 
emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
I know.  Her *mean streak* came out today; way over the top.  Maybe she's 
jealous because Ann is such a beautiful human being and that was a rockin' cute 
picture.  Share just *had* to put her down; she really doesn't like women.  Too 
bad; it must be her karma that she was born one to give her the opportunity 
to learn how to love herself (Hmyet another perspective.  ha.)


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:


In fact, Share's comments on Ann's photo were far, far nastier than anything 
Ann has ever said to her. 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:


Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. 
Your writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:


 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under 
the thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself 
nicely after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to 
acknowledge this other post.



Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my 
intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard 
about the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the 
smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you 
encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising, rudeness, 
misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to psychological 
rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are not getting the 
support you had hoped for your interesting take on my face in the photo 
(comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you are certainly 
welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as wrong as 
I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is also 
fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight 
for a change and own up.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:


Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
them.

You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
happen.

YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
And, of course, it worked.

So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
grudges -- could be appealed to.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

 Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
alleged honesty.

 Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
MGC has directed at me over the past year.

 Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I
deserved it retroactively!

 This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that she's
so desperate to present herself as.





 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@...
awoelflebater@... wrote:

 That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm also
looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded by
the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two birthdays.
Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of course
it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but then
there's no 

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
Actually, Share, you have it precisely backwards: The fact that Ann's comments 
were about you rather than about Emily means that she can be more objective 
about them than you can.
 

 You want to see nasty? Here's nasty:
 

 I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with tight,
 smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore.
 I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves.
 Judging by her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann
 and her face.

 

 And one more time, here are Ann's comments that inspired what I
 just quoted from you:
 

 Me too, me too (squeal!). How many types of granola does YOUR Whole Foods 
carry Richard? Are some made with hemp and are some organic? I just love 
organic hemp granola, don't you? I hope you'll post more pictures from your 
part of the world, I find them so uplifting, so refreshing. They are like a 
little part of yourself which is sacred and infinite and beautiful. How do you 
think granola relates to Arjuna? I kind of envision the Mahbharata would have 
been so much more interesting if it had included those warriors munching on 
granola as they approached the Kauravas to do battle.

 

 I don't think very many here would have trouble recognizing that Ann's post is 
a lighthearted parody, whereas Share's response is a vicious, dead serious, 
hate-filled attack. It simply doesn't get much nastier than a Nazi comparison, 
but in close competition are spiteful, disparaging remarks about a person's 
appearance.
 

 Share's remarks are way too off-target to upset Ann; but they reveal the 
extreme unpleasantness of Share's character underneath her faux-saintly facade.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

  Emily, #1, you're not objective about me or Ann. #2, Ann's comments were not 
  directed 
  against you, so you really can't accurately access their alleged gentleness 
  imo. Why don't 
  you think about it?
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:39 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, 
in her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. 
Your writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
 And, of course, it worked.
 
 So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
 have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
 grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
 post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
 

[FairfieldLife] The World is a Hologram

2013-11-20 Thread jr_esq
Leonard Susskind discusses his new ideas relating to cosmology.   

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DIl3Hfh9tY 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DIl3Hfh9tY
 
 

 But, from my point of view, if this is the case, our Earth (and all the other 
Earths that may exist in the universe) could be a reflection of the True Earth 
which is the Heaven that the Bible and the vedic literature have talked about.
 

 This holographic message is embedded in the wave function that initiated the 
Big Bang to create our universe.
 




[FairfieldLife] 4 / 40 again

2013-11-20 Thread TurquoiseB
And back at the same cafe again, cozy and warm again thanks to its
effective space heaters. It's way considerate of them to provide them,
so I thought I'd take advantage of their compassion (it must cost a
fortune to keep them running, given the utility rates in Paris) and rap
for a bit.

Cafe life is so much a *part* of Paris that it's unthinkable to not take
part in it just because it's cold outside. And although you in the
Midwest or Far North may not think that 4 degrees Celsius / 40
Fahrenheit qualifies as cold, it does to us here in Paris. On my way
over here I saw several brass monkeys clutching at their groins, as if
they'd lost something. It's that cold.

But it's cozy warm here on this terrace, and a number of people like
myself are here taking advantage of it. I'm at the chilly end of the
terrace, actually, because directly under the space heaters is actually
not the best place to sit if you're using a computer; the radiant heat
overheats them very quickly. But, even though no one else is using a
computer, I'm not alone over here in the chilly part.

There are a couple of groups, and a couple of loners, like me. One group
is composed of young (late 20s) people who are obviously good friends.
When a new person arrives, he or she is greeted with bissous and smiles,
and the new arrival just drops in to the conversation as if they were
never *not* a part of it. The other group (I guess two is a group)
appears to be a late 30-ish couple on a date. It seems to be going OK so
far.

One of the loners is a woman I've seen here before. She's probably in
her 60s. This is her spot to chill and read her newspaper. She is the
quintessence of Don't Fuck With Me, I'm Reading My Newspaper, so no one
does, including myself. The other loner is another late 20s writer,
oddly reminiscent of Antoine Doinel at the same age. He's scribbling
furiously into one of those red Moleskine notebooks that is pretty much
de rigeur for a young, tortured cafe writer. It's part of the uniform.
Good for him; I wish him good writing.

Me, I've got my old, battered Acer laptop. Its hard disk growls, and one
of the clasps that holds its screen on is iffy, but I still love the
keyboard, and thus will probably hold onto it until it dies.

But now I should write something on it. But what? Oh, I know...





[FairfieldLife] Free Man In Paris, V4.0

2013-11-20 Thread TurquoiseB
I am a fortunate frood. I am sitting in a charming sidewalk cafe in the
Butte aux Cailles, sipping an acceptable beer, and getting paid to do
it. Sorta. I'm getting paid to be in Paris, by my client, for whom I
write tech stuff by day. And I have no reason to complain. The Airbnb
apartment I'm staying in for this two-week period is the nicest I've
ever found, the quartier is very lively and interesting, and the day
work for my client is going well. By night I get to haunt the cafes.

So why did I give notice last week, and tell my client that I'm leaving
at the end of my current contract?

The short answer is, It's time.

There are many answers, of course, and because I'm me, and because this
is a cool writing cafe, with a cozy-warm outdoor terrace even in the
chilly weather, I'll rap about some of them. Be warned.

* It's time. This is an opportune time for me to bow out of the project
I'm working on, because one software release cycle has just finished,
and the next is longer so they'll have ample time to find a replacement
tech writer. I do not bear the company any ill will, and would gladly
continue to work for them if I could do so from home. Unfortunately,
they have BBBRs (Big Bureaucratic Business Rules) that prohibit them
from allowing contractors to work from home.

* It's time. The gig, although it's been fascinating and lucrative, has
been wearing on me a bit physically. All the travel, the lugging of
suitcases around, and all that have begun to wear on me such that I'm
losing my appreciation of this great city. Can't have that.

* It's time. As much as I love Paris, I've been finding lately that I
love Leiden more. So I'd like to spend more time there.

* It's time. I have other things I'd prefer to write about than the
product my current client is paying me to write about.

* It's time. And, interestingly enough, *about* time. Now that I've
given my notice, I know that I only have a limited number of days left
in Paris on my client's nickel. I think this will inspire me to
appreciate them more, and take them less for granted.

So the long answer seems to be the same as the short answer. It's
time.





Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Judy, imo Ann has made plenty of nasty comments to and about me over the past 
year. MGC members need a taste of their own medicine occasionally. It seems 
they can dish it out, of course as a gang, but they really can't take it.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:37 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Actually, Share, you have it precisely backwards: The fact that Ann's comments 
were about you rather than about Emily means that she can be more objective 
about them than you can.

You want to see nasty? Here's nasty:

I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with tight,
smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore.
I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves.
Judging by her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann
and her face.


And one more time, here are Ann's comments that inspired what I
just quoted from you:

Me too, me too (squeal!). How many types of granola does YOUR Whole Foods 
carry Richard? Are some made with hemp and are some organic? I just love 
organic hemp granola, don't you? I hope you'll post more pictures from your 
part of the world, I find them so uplifting, so refreshing. They are like a 
little part of yourself which is sacred and infinite and beautiful. How do you 
think granola relates to Arjuna? I kind of envision the Mahbharata would have 
been so much more interesting if it had included those warriors munching on 
granola as they approached the Kauravas to do battle.


I don't think very many here would have trouble recognizing that Ann's post is 
a lighthearted parody, whereas Share's response is a vicious, dead serious, 
hate-filled attack. It simply doesn't get much nastier than a Nazi comparison, 
but in close competition are spiteful, disparaging remarks about a person's 
appearance.

Share's remarks are way too off-target to upset Ann; but they reveal the 
extreme unpleasantness of Share's character underneath her faux-saintly facade.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


 Emily, #1, you're not objective about me or Ann. #2, Ann's comments were not 
 directed 
 against you, so you really can't accurately access their alleged gentleness 
 imo. Why don't 
 you think about it?





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:39 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
  
Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. Your 
writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:


 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely 
after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to 
acknowledge this other post.



Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my 
intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about 
the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the 
smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you 
encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising, rudeness, 
misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to psychological 
rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are not getting the 
support you had hoped for your interesting take on my face in the photo 
(comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you are certainly 
welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as wrong as I 
think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is also fine, 
as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame you for 
despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:


Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
them.

You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
happen.

YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
And, of course, it worked.

So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
Good on ya Share. I take full and complete responsibility for what I said and 
why I said it.  Again, check your choice of words.  Why would you use the words 
ridicule and duplicity - they are a mirror of your own characteristics, 
imho.  Remember the h Share and finally, what about public forum do you not 
understand. That's one thing I enjoy - multiple perspectives. If you want to 
have a private talk with Richard, email him privately. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, do Obbajee and Susan count as women? Because I like them both. Ann has 
some good qualities but her ridicule and duplicity needed to be responded to, 
imo. Also imo, the MGC has itself been over the top recently. What I've noticed 
is that when I ignore you all, then one of you will butt into a fun exchange 
I'm having with someone else, in this case Richard, and proceed to poison the 
well. And of course, then it's the 3 or 4 or 5 of you against me. Seems very 
cowardly to me.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:16 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   I know.  Her *mean streak* came out today; way over the top.  Maybe she's 
jealous because Ann is such a beautiful human being and that was a rockin' cute 
picture.  Share just *had* to put her down; she really doesn't like women.  Too 
bad; it must be her karma that she was born one to give her the opportunity 
to learn how to love herself (Hmyet another perspective.  ha.)
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 In fact, Share's comments on Ann's photo were far, far nastier than anything 
Ann has ever said to her. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. Your 
writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
 And, of course, it worked.
 
 So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
 have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
 grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
 post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
 perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
 alleged honesty.
 
  Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
 MGC has directed at me over the past year.
 
  Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
 pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to her, I
 deserved it retroactively!
 

RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write.  Share, I say this 
based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies 
them.  You are *not* cute, Share.  I wonder if you have the ability to 
apologize for this?  You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share 
(the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee.  You simply aren't.  
Get over it.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Actually, Share, you have it precisely backwards: The fact that Ann's comments 
were about you rather than about Emily means that she can be more objective 
about them than you can.
 

 You want to see nasty? Here's nasty:
 

 I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with tight,
 smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore.
 I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves.
 Judging by her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann
 and her face.

 

 And one more time, here are Ann's comments that inspired what I
 just quoted from you:
 

 Me too, me too (squeal!). How many types of granola does YOUR Whole Foods 
carry Richard? Are some made with hemp and are some organic? I just love 
organic hemp granola, don't you? I hope you'll post more pictures from your 
part of the world, I find them so uplifting, so refreshing. They are like a 
little part of yourself which is sacred and infinite and beautiful. How do you 
think granola relates to Arjuna? I kind of envision the Mahbharata would have 
been so much more interesting if it had included those warriors munching on 
granola as they approached the Kauravas to do battle.

 

 I don't think very many here would have trouble recognizing that Ann's post is 
a lighthearted parody, whereas Share's response is a vicious, dead serious, 
hate-filled attack. It simply doesn't get much nastier than a Nazi comparison, 
but in close competition are spiteful, disparaging remarks about a person's 
appearance.
 

 Share's remarks are way too off-target to upset Ann; but they reveal the 
extreme unpleasantness of Share's character underneath her faux-saintly facade.
 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

  Emily, #1, you're not objective about me or Ann. #2, Ann's comments were not 
  directed 
  against you, so you really can't accurately access their alleged gentleness 
  imo. Why don't 
  you think about it?
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:39 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, 
in her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. 
Your writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke 

[FairfieldLife] TEDxFairfieldWomen2013

2013-11-20 Thread Dick Mays
Perhaps some of you are interested...

Begin forwarded message:
From: Facebook notification+yw5ny...@facebookmail.com
Subject: Burt invited you to TEDxFairfieldWomen2013 on Facebook

facebook

Burt Chojnowski invited you to TEDxFairfield's event:
TEDxFairfieldWomen2013
Thursday, December 5 at 9:00am at Cafe Paradiso


Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Right, Emily, Ann's snarky post was just one of many perspectives. As is my 
post about her photo.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:58 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com 
emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Good on ya Share. I take full and complete responsibility for what I said and 
why I said it.  Again, check your choice of words.  Why would you use the words 
ridicule and duplicity - they are a mirror of your own characteristics, 
imho.  Remember the h Share and finally, what about public forum do you not 
understand. That's one thing I enjoy - multiple perspectives. If you want to 
have a private talk with Richard, email him privately. 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Emily, do Obbajee and Susan count as women? Because I like them both. Ann has 
some good qualities but her ridicule and duplicity needed to be responded to, 
imo. Also imo, the MGC has itself been over the top recently. What I've noticed 
is that when I ignore you all, then one of you will butt into a fun exchange 
I'm having with someone else, in this case Richard, and proceed to poison the 
well. And of course, then it's the 3 or 4 or 5 of you against me. Seems very 
cowardly to me.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:16 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
  
I know.  Her *mean streak* came out today; way over the top.  Maybe she's 
jealous because Ann is such a beautiful human being and that was a rockin' cute 
picture.  Share just *had* to put her down; she really doesn't like women.  Too 
bad; it must be her karma that she was born one to give her the opportunity 
to learn how to love herself (Hmyet another perspective.  ha.)


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:


In fact, Share's comments on Ann's photo were far, far nastier than anything 
Ann has ever said to her. 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:


Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. 
Your writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:


 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under 
the thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself 
nicely after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to 
acknowledge this other post.



Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my 
intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard 
about the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love 
the smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you 
encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising, rudeness, 
misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to psychological 
rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are not getting the 
support you had hoped for your interesting take on my face in the photo 
(comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you are certainly 
welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as wrong as 
I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is also 
fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight 
for a change and own up.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:


Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
them.

You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
happen.

YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
And, of course, it worked.

So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
grudges -- could be appealed to.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

 Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty, ridiculing
post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
alleged honesty.

 Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity the
MGC has directed at me over the past year.

 Also notice that if I'm positive, then 

[FairfieldLife] RE: Free Man In Paris, V4.0

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
You took this lucrative job that landed you in Paris on your client's nickel 
for granted?  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 I am a fortunate frood. I am sitting in a charming sidewalk cafe in the
 Butte aux Cailles, sipping an acceptable beer, and getting paid to do
 it. Sorta. I'm getting paid to be in Paris, by my client, for whom I
 write tech stuff by day. And I have no reason to complain. The Airbnb
 apartment I'm staying in for this two-week period is the nicest I've
 ever found, the quartier is very lively and interesting, and the day
 work for my client is going well. By night I get to haunt the cafes.
 
 So why did I give notice last week, and tell my client that I'm leaving
 at the end of my current contract?
 
 The short answer is, It's time.
 
 There are many answers, of course, and because I'm me, and because this
 is a cool writing cafe, with a cozy-warm outdoor terrace even in the
 chilly weather, I'll rap about some of them. Be warned.
 
 * It's time. This is an opportune time for me to bow out of the project
 I'm working on, because one software release cycle has just finished,
 and the next is longer so they'll have ample time to find a replacement
 tech writer. I do not bear the company any ill will, and would gladly
 continue to work for them if I could do so from home. Unfortunately,
 they have BBBRs (Big Bureaucratic Business Rules) that prohibit them
 from allowing contractors to work from home.
 
 * It's time. The gig, although it's been fascinating and lucrative, has
 been wearing on me a bit physically. All the travel, the lugging of
 suitcases around, and all that have begun to wear on me such that I'm
 losing my appreciation of this great city. Can't have that.
 
 * It's time. As much as I love Paris, I've been finding lately that I
 love Leiden more. So I'd like to spend more time there.
 
 * It's time. I have other things I'd prefer to write about than the
 product my current client is paying me to write about.
 
 * It's time. And, interestingly enough, *about* time. Now that I've
 given my notice, I know that I only have a limited number of days left
 in Paris on my client's nickel. I think this will inspire me to
 appreciate them more, and take them less for granted.
 
 So the long answer seems to be the same as the short answer. It's
 time.



Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm 
not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? 





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com 
emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write.  Share, I say this 
based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies 
them.  You are *not* cute, Share.  I wonder if you have the ability to 
apologize for this?  You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share 
(the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee.  You simply aren't.  
Get over it.   


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:


Actually, Share, you have it precisely backwards: The fact that Ann's comments 
were about you rather than about Emily means that she can be more objective 
about them than you can.

You want to see nasty? Here's nasty:

I saw that picture of her looking like, IMO, an SS commando with tight,
smug smile, cocky posture and judgmental eyes. I don't wonder anymore.
I've heard that by the age of 40 a woman has the face she deserves.
Judging by her nasty posts towards me, I'd say that's quite true of Ann
and her face.


And one more time, here are Ann's comments that inspired what I
just quoted from you:

Me too, me too (squeal!). How many types of granola does YOUR Whole Foods 
carry Richard? Are some made with hemp and are some organic? I just love 
organic hemp granola, don't you? I hope you'll post more pictures from your 
part of the world, I find them so uplifting, so refreshing. They are like a 
little part of yourself which is sacred and infinite and beautiful. How do you 
think granola relates to Arjuna? I kind of envision the Mahbharata would have 
been so much more interesting if it had included those warriors munching on 
granola as they approached the Kauravas to do battle.


I don't think very many here would have trouble recognizing that Ann's post is 
a lighthearted parody, whereas Share's response is a vicious, dead serious, 
hate-filled attack. It simply doesn't get much nastier than a Nazi comparison, 
but in close competition are spiteful, disparaging remarks about a person's 
appearance.

Share's remarks are way too off-target to upset Ann; but they reveal the 
extreme unpleasantness of Share's character underneath her faux-saintly facade.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


 Emily, #1, you're not objective about me or Ann. #2, Ann's comments were not 
 directed 
 against you, so you really can't accurately access their alleged gentleness 
 imo. Why don't 
 you think about it?





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 11:39 AM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
  
Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. Your 
writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:


 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely 
after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to 
acknowledge this other post.



Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my 
intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about 
the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the 
smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you 
encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising, rudeness, 
misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to psychological 
rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are not getting the 
support you had hoped for your interesting take on my face in the photo 
(comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you are certainly 
welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as wrong as I 
think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is also fine, 
as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame you for 
despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:


Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
them.

You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
happen.

YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
antsy with them 

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread sharelong60
Richard, thanks for the comic relief. And btw, you started the other thread 
that's generating so much heat today. Go figure! 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 Just a reminder: Turq started this thread. LoL!
 
 On 11/20/2013 10:51 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
wrote:
 
  Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people.
 And my sense of humor is fine.
 
 None of the three of you (I'm cutting Emily a break because she isn't
 part of this latest outbreak of Junior High School nonsense) is worth
 pissing on. If you're all intent upon demonstrating how petty and
 idiotic you are, couldn't you possibly do it via email? Doing it here is
 rather discourteous to the rest of the people on this forum, who don't
 really give a shit who is winning these imaginary battles going on in
 your silly, vindictive little heads.
 
 Share, you *could* have just ignored anything Ann or Judy said about
 you. But n. You had to start things up again, so that again
 you're the focus of attention. I'm back to my original advice: SHUT THE
 FUCK UP!
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
  awoelflebater@ wrote:
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
  sharelong60@ wrote:
 
  turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me
 under the thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting
 herself nicely after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the
 integrity to acknowledge this other post.
 
 
 
  Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my
 intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard
 about the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love
 the smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges
 you encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising,
 rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to
 psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are
 not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on my
 face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but
 you are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and
 demeanor as wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was
 evident and that is also fine, as long as you are willing to admit
 ownership of it. I don't blame you for despising me, I get it and I
 probably deserve it but be straight for a change and own up.
 
 
  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
  turquoiseb@ wrote:
 
  Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You.
 Not
  them.
 
  You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
  into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
  disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
  nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going
 to
  happen.
 
  YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
  antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I
 posted
  the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying
 low
  as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
  And, of course, it worked.
 
  So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies
 who
  have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes
 and
  grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
  
   Judy in her cunning way has completely ignored the nasty,
 ridiculing
  post that Ann wrote. Which shows the depth of Judy's dishonesty. Or
  perhaps at this point she's simply totally self deluded about her
  alleged honesty.
  
   Also notice how she attempts to justify the deluge of negativity
 the
  MGC has directed at me over the past year.
  
   Also notice that if I'm positive, then according to Judy, I'm
  pandering. But if I stand up to their ridicule, then according to
 her, I
  deserved it retroactively!
  
   This is why I will never see Judy as the paragon of honesty that
 she's
  so desperate to present herself as.
  
  
  
  
  
   On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:14 AM, awoelflebater@
  awoelflebater@ wrote:
  
   That is my happy look Share, you should see me when I'm mad! I'm
 also
  looking at the man I most love in the world at that moment surrounded
 by
  the pristine beauty of British Columbia in celebration of two
 birthdays.
  Focus on the scenery, that is what I most wanted to show you. Of
 course
  it isn't as interesting as pictures of the strip malls in Texas but
 then
  there's no accounting for taste and perception. Is Knowledge
 Structured
  in Consciousness do you 

RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that 
interesting!? 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm 
not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? 
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write.  Share, I say this 
based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies 
them.  You are *not* cute, Share.  I wonder if you have the ability to 
apologize for this?  You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share 
(the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee.  You simply aren't.  
Get over it.   
 






 
 
 
 






Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are 
ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that 
interesting!? 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm 
not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? 





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
  
This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write.  Share, I say this 
based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies 
them.  You are *not* cute, Share.  I wonder if you have the ability to 
apologize for this?  You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share 
(the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee.  You simply aren't.  
Get over it.   



RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
Read the words you wrote to Ann, Share.  Seriously, pretend I wrote them when 
you do that.  How do they make you feel?  For one, her *face* Share?  My god, 
Share. Give up on self-help and pray to God for forgiveness.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Right, Emily, Ann's snarky post was just one of many perspectives. As is my 
post about her photo.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:58 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   Good on ya Share. I take full and complete responsibility for what I said 
and why I said it.  Again, check your choice of words.  Why would you use the 
words ridicule and duplicity - they are a mirror of your own 
characteristics, imho.  Remember the h Share and finally, what about public 
forum do you not understand. That's one thing I enjoy - multiple perspectives. 
If you want to have a private talk with Richard, email him privately. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, do Obbajee and Susan count as women? Because I like them both. Ann has 
some good qualities but her ridicule and duplicity needed to be responded to, 
imo. Also imo, the MGC has itself been over the top recently. What I've noticed 
is that when I ignore you all, then one of you will butt into a fun exchange 
I'm having with someone else, in this case Richard, and proceed to poison the 
well. And of course, then it's the 3 or 4 or 5 of you against me. Seems very 
cowardly to me.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:16 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   I know.  Her *mean streak* came out today; way over the top.  Maybe she's 
jealous because Ann is such a beautiful human being and that was a rockin' cute 
picture.  Share just *had* to put her down; she really doesn't like women.  Too 
bad; it must be her karma that she was born one to give her the opportunity 
to learn how to love herself (Hmyet another perspective.  ha.)
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 In fact, Share's comments on Ann's photo were far, far nastier than anything 
Ann has ever said to her. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. Your 
writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
 as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
 And, of course, it worked.
 
 So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old biddies who
 have nothing to do but subject the rest of us to your petty dislikes and
 grudges -- could be appealed to.
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
Share Long wrote:
 
  Judy in her cunning way has 

RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
Ann has never come anywhere near the vicious nastiness of your attack on her.
 

 Face it, Share, you lost control. You let the mask slip, and we all saw the 
ugliness underneath. It's slipped before and given us glimpses, but now you 
have to live with the knowledge that this time we got a really good look, and 
the faux-sainthood is down the tubes, exposed as a lie.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

  Judy, imo Ann has made plenty of nasty comments to and about me over the 
  past year. 
  MGC members need a taste of their own medicine occasionally. It seems they 
  can dish it 
  out, of course as a gang, but they really can't take it.
 






Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Emily, imo this is a drop in the ocean of nastiness that Ann and Judy and you 
create on an ongoing basis against me. Your being self righteous now does not 
change my opinion.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:20 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com 
emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Read the words you wrote to Ann, Share.  Seriously, pretend I wrote them when 
you do that.  How do they make you feel?  For one, her *face* Share?  My god, 
Share. Give up on self-help and pray to God for forgiveness.   


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Right, Emily, Ann's snarky post was just one of many perspectives. As is my 
post about her photo.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:58 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
  
Good on ya Share. I take full and complete responsibility for what I said and 
why I said it.  Again, check your choice of words.  Why would you use the words 
ridicule and duplicity - they are a mirror of your own characteristics, 
imho.  Remember the h Share and finally, what about public forum do you not 
understand. That's one thing I enjoy - multiple perspectives. If you want to 
have a private talk with Richard, email him privately. 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Emily, do Obbajee and Susan count as women? Because I like them both. Ann has 
some good qualities but her ridicule and duplicity needed to be responded to, 
imo. Also imo, the MGC has itself been over the top recently. What I've noticed 
is that when I ignore you all, then one of you will butt into a fun exchange 
I'm having with someone else, in this case Richard, and proceed to poison the 
well. And of course, then it's the 3 or 4 or 5 of you against me. Seems very 
cowardly to me.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:16 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
  
I know.  Her *mean streak* came out today; way over the top.  Maybe she's 
jealous because Ann is such a beautiful human being and that was a rockin' cute 
picture.  Share just *had* to put her down; she really doesn't like women.  Too 
bad; it must be her karma that she was born one to give her the opportunity 
to learn how to love herself (Hmyet another perspective.  ha.)


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:


In fact, Share's comments on Ann's photo were far, far nastier than anything 
Ann has ever said to her. 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:


Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, 
in her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do 
this. Your writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And 
my sense of humor is fine. 




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:


 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under 
the thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself 
nicely after she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to 
acknowledge this other post.



Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my 
intention is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard 
about the Whole foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love 
the smorgasbord that is FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you 
encounter here. Who is exempt from name calling, chastising, rudeness, 
misunderstanding or downright verbal abuse (as opposed to psychological 
rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry if you are not getting the 
support you had hoped for your interesting take on my face in the photo 
(comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you are certainly 
welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as wrong 
as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't 
blame you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be 
straight for a change and own
 up.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:


Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
them.

You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
happen.

YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
the number of times they have done so since August, and them laying low
as a result. You missed the attention, so you tried to provoke them.
And, of course, it worked.

So much for my belief that you -- out of the four of you old 

Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Of course this is your opinion, Judy because you are not objective about me or 
Ann. I've never claimed sainthood. Your projection, your fantasies. 





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:21 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Ann has never come anywhere near the vicious nastiness of your attack on her.

Face it, Share, you lost control. You let the mask slip, and we all saw the 
ugliness underneath. It's slipped before and given us glimpses, but now you 
have to live with the knowledge that this time we got a really good look, and 
the faux-sainthood is down the tubes, exposed as a lie.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


 Judy, imo Ann has made plenty of nasty comments to and about me over the past 
 year. 
 MGC members need a taste of their own medicine occasionally. It seems they 
 can dish it 
 out, of course as a gang, but they really can't take it.




RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a 
parenthetical is, right?) 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are 
ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that 
interesting!? 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm 
not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? 
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write.  Share, I say this 
based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies 
them.  You are *not* cute, Share.  I wonder if you have the ability to 
apologize for this?  You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share 
(the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee.  You simply aren't.  
Get over it.   
 






 
 
 
 




 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both 
want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a 
parenthetical is, right?) 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are 
ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
  
You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that 
interesting!? 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm 
not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? 





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
  
This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write.  Share, I say this 
based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies 
them.  You are *not* cute, Share.  I wonder if you have the ability to 
apologize for this?  You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share 
(the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee.  You simply aren't.  
Get over it.   





RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
And Share, *you* wrote that post.  *You* created the nastiness.  *You* are not 
a victim of FFL.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, imo this is a drop in the ocean of nastiness that Ann and Judy and you 
create on an ongoing basis against me. Your being self righteous now does not 
change my opinion.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:20 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   Read the words you wrote to Ann, Share.  Seriously, pretend I wrote them 
when you do that.  How do they make you feel?  For one, her *face* Share?  My 
god, Share. Give up on self-help and pray to God for forgiveness.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Right, Emily, Ann's snarky post was just one of many perspectives. As is my 
post about her photo.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:58 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   Good on ya Share. I take full and complete responsibility for what I said 
and why I said it.  Again, check your choice of words.  Why would you use the 
words ridicule and duplicity - they are a mirror of your own 
characteristics, imho.  Remember the h Share and finally, what about public 
forum do you not understand. That's one thing I enjoy - multiple perspectives. 
If you want to have a private talk with Richard, email him privately. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, do Obbajee and Susan count as women? Because I like them both. Ann has 
some good qualities but her ridicule and duplicity needed to be responded to, 
imo. Also imo, the MGC has itself been over the top recently. What I've noticed 
is that when I ignore you all, then one of you will butt into a fun exchange 
I'm having with someone else, in this case Richard, and proceed to poison the 
well. And of course, then it's the 3 or 4 or 5 of you against me. Seems very 
cowardly to me.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:16 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   I know.  Her *mean streak* came out today; way over the top.  Maybe she's 
jealous because Ann is such a beautiful human being and that was a rockin' cute 
picture.  Share just *had* to put her down; she really doesn't like women.  Too 
bad; it must be her karma that she was born one to give her the opportunity 
to learn how to love herself (Hmyet another perspective.  ha.)
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 In fact, Share's comments on Ann's photo were far, far nastier than anything 
Ann has ever said to her. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. Your 
writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 the number of times they have done so since 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Scientology super power shocker!

2013-11-20 Thread Michael Jackson
thank you so much for posting that link - that was an enjoyable read - never 
ceases to amaze how eager people are for the craziest stuff

On Wed, 11/20/13, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Scientology super power shocker!
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Wednesday, November 20, 2013, 1:32 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   Look out Fairfield, the church of
 $cientology has upped the ante with it's new super
 powers centre:
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/the-church-of-scientologys-new-145m-complex-has-generated-more-in-fundraising-than-it-cost-8950282.html
 Apparently one can become, amongst other things,
 aware of awareness! Sounds like they are well on your patch.
 No mention of levitation though [maybe they're not
 *that* stupid] but they are claiming to revive the dead! we
 look forward to a new novel by Ron Hubbard shortly.
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Free Man In Paris, V4.0

2013-11-20 Thread Bhairitu
With a birthday coming are you taking early SS?  With a big enough check 
from the USG it might be worth it.  I've even considered it myself as 
this dumbass country wants us old farts to work until we drop dead but 
then they don't want to hire us old farts.


On 11/20/2013 10:52 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


I am a fortunate frood. I am sitting in a charming sidewalk cafe in the
Butte aux Cailles, sipping an acceptable beer, and getting paid to do
it. Sorta. I'm getting paid to be in Paris, by my client, for whom I
write tech stuff by day. And I have no reason to complain. The Airbnb
apartment I'm staying in for this two-week period is the nicest I've
ever found, the quartier is very lively and interesting, and the day
work for my client is going well. By night I get to haunt the cafes.

So why did I give notice last week, and tell my client that I'm leaving
at the end of my current contract?

The short answer is, It's time.

There are many answers, of course, and because I'm me, and because this
is a cool writing cafe, with a cozy-warm outdoor terrace even in the
chilly weather, I'll rap about some of them. Be warned.

* It's time. This is an opportune time for me to bow out of the project
I'm working on, because one software release cycle has just finished,
and the next is longer so they'll have ample time to find a replacement
tech writer. I do not bear the company any ill will, and would gladly
continue to work for them if I could do so from home. Unfortunately,
they have BBBRs (Big Bureaucratic Business Rules) that prohibit them
from allowing contractors to work from home.

* It's time. The gig, although it's been fascinating and lucrative, has
been wearing on me a bit physically. All the travel, the lugging of
suitcases around, and all that have begun to wear on me such that I'm
losing my appreciation of this great city. Can't have that.

* It's time. As much as I love Paris, I've been finding lately that I
love Leiden more. So I'd like to spend more time there.

* It's time. I have other things I'd prefer to write about than the
product my current client is paying me to write about.

* It's time. And, interestingly enough, *about* time. Now that I've
given my notice, I know that I only have a limited number of days left
in Paris on my client's nickel. I think this will inspire me to
appreciate them more, and take them less for granted.

So the long answer seems to be the same as the short answer. It's
time.






RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
*YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE*  *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE*  *FEEL THE FEELINGS 
SHARE*
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both 
want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a 
parenthetical is, right?) 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are 
ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that 
interesting!? 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm 
not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? 
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write.  Share, I say this 
based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies 
them.  You are *not* cute, Share.  I wonder if you have the ability to 
apologize for this?  You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share 
(the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee.  You simply aren't.  
Get over it.   
 






 
 
 
 




 
 

 




 
 
 
 



 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 





RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
Share, Can you write...I am angry and I don't like Ann and Judy and Emily.  
Primal emotions Share - do you have the ability to claim those even?  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, imo this is a drop in the ocean of nastiness that Ann and Judy and you 
create on an ongoing basis against me. Your being self righteous now does not 
change my opinion.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:20 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   Read the words you wrote to Ann, Share.  Seriously, pretend I wrote them 
when you do that.  How do they make you feel?  For one, her *face* Share?  My 
god, Share. Give up on self-help and pray to God for forgiveness.   
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Right, Emily, Ann's snarky post was just one of many perspectives. As is my 
post about her photo.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:58 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   Good on ya Share. I take full and complete responsibility for what I said 
and why I said it.  Again, check your choice of words.  Why would you use the 
words ridicule and duplicity - they are a mirror of your own 
characteristics, imho.  Remember the h Share and finally, what about public 
forum do you not understand. That's one thing I enjoy - multiple perspectives. 
If you want to have a private talk with Richard, email him privately. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, do Obbajee and Susan count as women? Because I like them both. Ann has 
some good qualities but her ridicule and duplicity needed to be responded to, 
imo. Also imo, the MGC has itself been over the top recently. What I've noticed 
is that when I ignore you all, then one of you will butt into a fun exchange 
I'm having with someone else, in this case Richard, and proceed to poison the 
well. And of course, then it's the 3 or 4 or 5 of you against me. Seems very 
cowardly to me.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:16 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   I know.  Her *mean streak* came out today; way over the top.  Maybe she's 
jealous because Ann is such a beautiful human being and that was a rockin' cute 
picture.  Share just *had* to put her down; she really doesn't like women.  Too 
bad; it must be her karma that she was born one to give her the opportunity 
to learn how to love herself (Hmyet another perspective.  ha.)
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 In fact, Share's comments on Ann's photo were far, far nastier than anything 
Ann has ever said to her. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 Share, Ann was gently teasing you and commenting on the thread in general, in 
her inimitably creative style.  Nasty ridiculing? - Ann doesn't do this. Your 
writing is a mirror of you.  Think about it.   
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Ann, imo you have a *gift* for especially nasty ridiculing of people. And my 
sense of humor is fine. 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote:

  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, you're wrong. Ann started it by writing a post ridiculing me under the 
thread What I Did Today. She's very good IMO at presenting herself nicely after 
she's been nasty. Neither she nor Judy has the integrity to acknowledge this 
other post.

 

 Share, here is the thing. Yes I goof on you, yes it may seem like my intention 
is to ridicule, yes I was making fun of your post to Richard about the Whole 
foods thing. But come on, get a grip. You claim to love the smorgasbord that is 
FFL, you say you like the personal challenges you encounter here. Who is exempt 
from name calling, chastising, rudeness, misunderstanding or downright verbal 
abuse (as opposed to psychological rape) here on this forum? NO ONE. I am sorry 
if you are not getting the support you had hoped for your interesting take on 
my face in the photo (comprising about 1/100th of the image space BTW) but you 
are certainly welcome to your opinion about my Nazi-like stance and demeanor as 
wrong as I think it may be. However, your hostility was evident and that is 
also fine, as long as you are willing to admit ownership of it. I don't blame 
you for despising me, I get it and I probably deserve it but be straight for a 
change and own up.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Share, YOU started this latest round of Mean Girls Dumping On You. Not
 them.
 
 You didn't *have* to comment on Ann's photo, let alone try to rope me
 into it by addressing me directly. I didn't reply 1) because I
 disagreed, and thought it was a fairly nice photo of Ann enjoying
 nature, and 2) because I knew what would happen, and WHY it was going to
 happen.
 
 YOU started up the fray again. As far as I can tell, you were getting
 antsy with them NOT dumping on you for a couple of days, after I posted
 

[FairfieldLife] Born again?

2013-11-20 Thread salyavin808
Another book on reincarnation for those who are interested in the possibility. 
 

 The article drew my eye because of a claim that quantum physics may hold the 
key - but I don't see how from the article here but it's good that the people 
with beliefs of life in the great beyond have got the message that whatever 
ideas they have they are going to *have* to fit in with physics.
 

 Funny how the Daily Mail seems to be on a spiritual trip these days, doesn't 
seem to suit them somehow. All good fun as far as I'm concerned...
 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2509769/New-book-reveals-children-believe-reincarnated.html
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2509769/New-book-reveals-children-believe-reincarnated.html

RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread emilymaenot
Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely, 
Share.   Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today and I am in a 
good mood. Sincerely, Emily.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 *YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE*  *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE*  *FEEL THE FEELINGS 
SHARE*
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both 
want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a 
parenthetical is, right?) 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are 
ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that 
interesting!? 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm 
not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? 
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write.  Share, I say this 
based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies 
them.  You are *not* cute, Share.  I wonder if you have the ability to 
apologize for this?  You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share 
(the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee.  You simply aren't.  
Get over it.   
 






 
 
 
 




 
 

 




 
 
 
 



 
 

 
 



 
 
 
 







Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Just for the record, I don't know why Emily put those words in quotes because I 
did not write these words to her.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:07 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com 
emilymae...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely, 
Share.   Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today and I am in a 
good mood. Sincerely, Emily.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:


*YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE*  *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE*  *FEEL THE FEELINGS 
SHARE*



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both 
want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason.






On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
  
No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a 
parenthetical is, right?) 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are 
ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me.






On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
  
You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that 
interesting!? 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm 
not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? 






On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
  
This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write.  Share, I say this 
based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies 
them.  You are *not* cute, Share.  I wonder if you have the ability to 
apologize for this?  You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share 
(the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee.  You simply aren't.  
Get over it.   








[FairfieldLife] Fwd: 2 Videos on Small Businesses in Fairfield

2013-11-20 Thread Dick Mays
Forwarded from Steve Hall.  (You may have to copy and paste the below links 
into your browser.)

 Thought you might enjoy the short films done recently by my son, Evan, for 
Youtube original content.  

The 2 with links below were made about two very interesting, small businesses 
here in Fairfield and thought you might enjoy both.

Radiance Dairy (7 minutes): http://youtu.be/Ejrs986wTJI
Bovard Studios (12 minutes):  http://youtu.be/yYQbVzgxUhs

…

All the best, 
Steve



RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread authfriend
Just for the record, Share isn't this stupid. She pretends to be this stupid.
 
Share babbled:

  Just for the record, I don't know why Emily put those words in quotes 
  because I did not 
  write these words to her.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:07 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. 
Sincerely, Share.   Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today 
and I am in a good mood. Sincerely, Emily.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:

 *YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE*  *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE*  *FEEL THE FEELINGS 
SHARE*
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both 
want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a 
parenthetical is, right?) 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are 
ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me.
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that 
interesting!? 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm 
not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? 
 

 
 
 On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
   This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write.  Share, I say this 
based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies 
them.  You are *not* cute, Share.  I wonder if you have the ability to 
apologize for this?  You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share 
(the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee.  You simply aren't.  
Get over it.   
 






 
 
 
 




 
 

 




 
 
 
 



 
 

 




 
 
 
 






 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 






Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Country Chuckles

2013-11-20 Thread Richard Williams
A man rushed into a busy doctor's office and shouted, Doctor!  I think
 I'm shrinking!  The doctor calmly responded, Now, settle down.  You'll
 just have to be a little patient.


On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Richard J. Williams
pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

  Barack! This is NOT a conference call.


 On 10/27/2013 6:28 PM, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote:



- War does not determine who is right, only who is left.




 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... punditster@...wrote:

  Shotgun wedding: a matter of wife and death.

  On 10/27/2013 9:03 AM, steve.sundur@... wrote:



  Funny, funny, funny!


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.comfairfieldlife@yahoogroups.comwrote:

  The only useful purpose for a child's middle name is so they  know when
 Mom is really angry  with them.

  On 10/27/2013 8:09 AM, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:





- You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to
skydive twice.



 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.comfairfieldlife@yahoogroups.comwrote:

  Before you criticize others, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That
 way, you'll be 5,280 feet away from them and they'll be barefooted.

  On 10/25/2013 5:58 PM, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:





- To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you
hit the target.



 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.comfairfieldlife@yahoogroups.comwrote:

  While it is true that the early bird gets the worm, it's the second
 mouse that gets the cheese.




   





Re: Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: Mean Girls -- the research

2013-11-20 Thread Share Long
Where I come from, Emily's quotation marks means that she's quoting me. Except 
I did not write those words to her, directly nor via the forum.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:08 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Just for the record, Share isn't this stupid. She pretends to be this stupid.

Share babbled:


 Just for the record, I don't know why Emily put those words in quotes because 
 I did not 
 write these words to her.





On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:07 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
  
Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely, 
Share.   Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today and I am in a 
good mood. Sincerely, Emily.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote:


*YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE*  *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE*  *FEEL THE FEELINGS 
SHARE*



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both 
want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason.






On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
  
No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a 
parenthetical is, right?) 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are 
ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me.






On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
  
You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that 
interesting!? 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! 
I'm not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that? 






On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:01 PM, emilymaenot@... emilymaenot@... 
wrote:
 
  
This might be the *nastiest* thing I've seen her write.  Share, I say this 
based on the face value of your words, ignoring the energy that accompanies 
them.  You are *not* cute, Share.  I wonder if you have the ability to 
apologize for this?  You are threatened by strong and beautiful women Share 
(the ones that are posting); you want to be a Queen Bee.  You simply aren't.  
Get over it.   










  1   2   >