[FairfieldLife] Re: People are beginning to catch on

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB  wrote:

 What is she going to do when *no one* falls for her tarbaby act any
 more, and allows themselves to get sucked into an argument with her
 just because she wants one?

 I predict panic.


Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 02/08/14 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 02/15/14 00:00:00
304 messages as of (UTC) 02/09/14 23:44:16

67 authfriend

Given an estimated 12-hour posting day, that's 2.8 posts per hour. Are
we looking at another record posting week for the Judester?  :-)

Then again, look on the bright side. Maybe she'll follow her cult
leader's lead and post a 13,000-word manifesto *demanding* that people
argue with her...or else. And we all know what comes after that.
Something to look forward to...



:-)





[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 If you haven't already done so you might want to read Carlsen's take
on Ayatollah Khomeini. To me he was clearly a cruel, narrow-minded
fanatic with an instinctive hatred of western ideas of freedom. But
where I see black Carlsen sees white. Follow the link for his portrait
of the mad imam; but here's a typical quote:
  He did not smile once; his face was implacably set in the resolution
of his will; God demanded everything from him; he had given his life to
serving God. There was nothing to laugh at, to be amused at, to wonder
about; his course had been set and he was in the determined consequences
of that course: to bring Islam into the prominence which its divine
genesis had portended. He lived for Islam; he had become the instrument
of Islam; he had no purpose but the enactment of Islam. His
individuality seemed merged with the universality of his higher
purpose.

  http://tinyurl.com/nbmpvj9 http://tinyurl.com/nbmpvj9
http://tinyurl.com/nbmpvj9 http://tinyurl.com/nbmpvj9

For the record, s3raphita, this projection of idealized fantasies onto
Khomeini is pretty much standard Narcissistic Personality Disorder
stuff, combined with mania. What happens is that the NPD individual,
*lost* in self-obsession and convinced of how important *he* is to the
world (we *are* talking about the person who billed himself as the
World Teacher, after all) gets high on mania and looks at someone else
and projects that same supposed grandiose greatness there. So for Robin,
Khomeini became the same kind of God-directed leader he considered
himself to be.

But it's not *just* Khomeini he was a fan boy for. And the fan boy
schtick was not *just* in the past. Robin did the same sort of fantasy
projection on other people whom he chose to focus on during one of his
manic states.

For example, check out what he said about Lady Gaga back in June, 2011.
It's the same schtick. And he carried on carrying on about it for some
time, ready to argue with anyone who disputed *his* accurate view of
Lady Gaga, because of course...they're wrong, and he's right. I suspect
in a few years, when no one even remembers who Lady Gaga was, he'll
issue a repudiation of what he wrote back in 2011, claiming similar
levels of delusion. He'll probably even find a way to make his mania
someone else's fault: Lingering influence from the Vedic demons who
once convinced me I was enlightened made me write this stuff about Lady
Gaga.  :-)  :-)  :-)

My take? She is so passionate and devoted to her music—and her
message (inner God-given dignity of every person: For God makes no
mistakes BTW) comes through non-didactically, non-sentimentally. As you
say, her effect on her little monsters is real. They can't help what
happens to them during a LG performance—and I have been in a live
audience watching her: she does more good for each person than TM ever
did (if you will excuse the hyperbole, the bitterness, the
outrageousness of that declaration—but for me, it's true). No one of
course is 'transformed' but her effect seems to make people a little
more sincere, a little more intelligent, a little more grounded.
Although I doubt ANYONE knows just how she is doing this. For me, her
dedication as an artist is pure and deathless, and this invites a grace
which desexualizes her just to the right degree, while allowing her,
non-egotistically to sacrifice herself inside her art. And the form and
message of the art are one. That almost is unprecedented in my
experience. (I have been a performer myself).

A woman dishabille and yet private lust for her is not permitted. This
is because her art is (and the woman behind the art) so sincere and
inspired that a certain chasteness secretly enters into the
context—defying the very provocative and sexually uninhibited way
she performs. Inside her performance—I have studied her carefully
up-close—she is that good (as an artist) that she surrenders all of
herself, and from within this posture of total giving, she is able to
create an effect which defies analysis. People feel good, but it is not
an escape, nor is it some kind of epiphany. She just works on you, and
the sensation (for me at least—and it seems reflected in the faces
of most of the audience as well: see that HBO MSG Concert) is controlled
by a beautiful intelligence.

You will also notice she never breaks her concentration. She remains
Lady Gaga, even in her intimate improvisational words to those fans who
are standing near to her. She does not get off on the energy, the rush
of her performance. She remains invulnerable, poised, focused when all
that adulation and enthusiasm comes at her. She wants to stay inside
herself, and not be seduced by any experience of what it is like to be
her performing. For me this borders on the miraculous. Vanity, pride,
egotism are banished in the commitment she has made to her art—and I
would say, even her 'religion', for she certainly believes she has a
message, and she efficaciously 

[FairfieldLife] RE: Iranian Warships Sailing to the US?

2014-02-10 Thread nablusoss1008
And the Arab Spring is not over. The cry for freedom of expression and basic 
human rights are getting stronger by the hour. Turkey is a bomb waiting to go 
off.


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Marshy's Marketing

2014-02-10 Thread Michael Jackson
Glad to be of service - laughin' is good! Next time I'm up in Canada (never 
been actually) I'll give you a holler. As to Bucky I figgered maybe there was 
some kinda jyotish rectification for straightening out one's attitude and point 
of view - wait, that's believing everything a raja says!!!

On Mon, 2/10/14, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Marshy's Marketing
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Monday, February 10, 2014, 4:09 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@...
 wrote:
 
 and how do you
 propose I get a rectification?
 God,
 Michael, sometimes you make me laugh but good. I would love
 to meet you in real life; I'd be privileged to sample
 your baking and I'm sure we'd have a good chuckle or
 two.
 
 
  On Mon, 2/10/14, dhamiltony2k5@...
 dhamiltony2k5@...
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Marshy's Marketing
 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 Date: Monday, February 10, 2014, 1:00 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Om
 
 No, the teaching of transcending meditation is called
 
 initiative. 
 
 The new TM.org has initiative.  What a crock of stinking
 dog
 
 manure
 
 you make as prediction here.  You obviously need a
 
 rectification. 
 
 The meditative state of transcending meditation is not
 going
 
 to go
 
 away anytime soon for a long time never.  Transcending
 
 meditation is
 
 a long way from over as the meditative state.  The Unified
 
 Field is
 
 forever.  You are fighting science.  Repent your ways, 
 come
 
 back to
 
 meditation and join with a group meditation nearby
 
 you.Unconditional
 
 Surrender,
 
 
 
 -Buck
 
 in the Dome
 
 mjackson74
 
 writes:
 
 What
 
 you are seeing with the Movement is a very carefully
 
 orchestrated tactic to sanitize TM as much as possible to
 
 re-sell it to the ignorant masses. The idea of
 
 disassociating TM from Maharishi should be taken as an
 
 insult to him, if you really think he and what he did were
 
 the best thing since sliced bread, but I know you don't
 
 because you, like all TB'ers, will swallow anything the
 
 Movement tells you to swallow (except stuff in your case,
 
 that keeps people out of the Domes)
 
 
 
 
 
 This offering TM and no longer mentioning Marshy or
 
 minimizing his presence and role to the public is the same
 
 as not having any mention or presence of the rajas at MUM
 
 during Visitor's Weekend there. They are hiding what
 has
 
 been and what is. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Too bad for them, because you can't escape your karmic
 
 baggage forever - the excesses and unconscionable behavior
 
 of Marshy, Bevan, Hagelin and the Movement at large will be
 
 made public eventually and the general public will turn
 them
 
 out to pasture. When this happens, MUM will lose its
 
 accreditation, Girish and the Srivastavas boys will then
 
 sell the entire campus to developers who want to build some
 
 houses that make sense, the vastu buildings are all torn
 
 down, the Domes are used as grain storage silos until the
 
 grain dealers realize the Domes have mold problems and they
 
 are then torn down completely. Some former students will
 
 come to town right before they are demolished to have their
 
 pictures taken in front of the buildings they used to have
 
 sex on in the summertime. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Since the US is not contributing enough revenue for Girish,
 
 he will cease the payments to the American rajas who will
 
 then come camp out in YOUR pasture. Let's see how long
 
 you let them camp there. 
 
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, 2/9/14, dhamiltony2k5@...
 
 dhamiltony2k5@...
 
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Marshy's Marketing
 
 
 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 
 
 Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014, 9:41 PM   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 MJ,
 
 
 
 Okay so you are not necessarily anti- transcending
 
 
 
 meditation
 
 
 
 although you are down in the mouth about some things TM and
 
 
 
 some
 
 
 
 people TM.   And by what you are writing you feel Maharishi
 
 
 
 evidently
 
 
 
 morally compromised himself but responding to criticism
 
 like
 
 
 
 yours
 
 
 
 Maharishi has been taken out of the TM presentation now. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 They
 
 
 
 refer to the transcending yogic origins but no longer,
 
 “as
 
 
 
 taught
 
 
 
 by MMY”.  TM now is standing on the basis of the accrued
 
 
 
 scientific
 
 
 
 research.  Rightfully so.  That was the revolutionary
 
 
 
 accomplishment
 
 
 
 of Maharishi to effectively depersonalize it in the end to
 
 
 
 be the
 
 
 
 universal teaching of transcending meditation. Say what you
 
 
 
 will
 
 
 
 about Maharishi otherwise he was masterful as a great
 
 
 
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Marshy's Marketing

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson  wrote:

 Glad to be of service - laughin' is good! Next time I'm up in Canada
(never been actually) I'll give you a holler. As to Bucky I figgered
maybe there was some kinda jyotish rectification for straightening out
one's attitude and point of view - wait, that's believing everything a
raja says!!!

I would imagine that the nature of the rectification can be inferred
from the root word rectal.  :-)




 
 On Mon, 2/10/14, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... wrote:

  Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Marshy's Marketing
  To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
  Date: Monday, February 10, 2014, 4:09 AM

  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@
  wrote:
  
   and how do you
   propose I get a rectification?

 God,
  Michael, sometimes you make me laugh but good. I would love
  to meet you in real life; I'd be privileged to sample
  your baking and I'm sure we'd have a good chuckle or
  two.




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Robin Carlsen Cult on Fairfield Life

2014-02-10 Thread Share Long
Richard, technically I can't really be considered a prick. How about wonka as 
in turq's up to their willys and wonkas in snow?





On Sunday, February 9, 2014 11:07 PM, Richard J. Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  
On 2/9/2014 10:35 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:

Don't put me in there with those two other tricksters.

So, it's all settled then - Robin and Judy are trickster
co-conspirators and Barry, Steve, Share, and Richard are pricks for
pointing out that Robin was a trickster who tried to ruin the forum
with his parodies and trap postings and Judy thought it was fun, but
now she thinks it's not fun anymore because all the pricks and liars
found out it was a trap set up by Robin and Judy, but you're not one
of those other tricksters.



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this the 
best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as much 
a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Robin Carlsen Cult on Fairfield Life

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur


 Really strange isn't Richard.  But compassion is what I feel right now, at 
least for Judy.  I think she had a lot riding on the whole affair.  More than 
some of us might have realized.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:52 PM, Share Long wrote:
  Good catch, Judy.
 
 Judy caught Robin telling fibs and Judy said it was just a parody. But 
 Robin was serious. Good catch!
 
 Judy, I think you an intelligent and well-meaning person; but Curtis 
 and Barry?and even to some extent, although less passionately, 
 Steve?have identified what is wrong with you; and I think you must be 
 courageous enough to finally examine yourself, since I, who until just 
 now was one of your most loyal supporters have undergone an 
 extraordinary change of heart, and have admitted to myself that you are 
 the person in the wrong here, that Barry is right. Would you even just 
 for the sake of how much I have defended you in the past, think about 
 what I have said here?
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how access 
the previous classic format and search feature.  
 

 Now, that is a hoot.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 2:07 PM, steve.sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote:

 You're in high form today Judy. 
 It looks to me like Judy is working on Sunday again - judging by her response 
times she hasn't left her desk since six o'clock this morning. It looks like 
Judy is monitoring all of Steve's messages from her home office. But, it took 
Judy almost eight hours to get around to calling Steve a liar. It looks like 
Barry really pushed some buttons again. Go figure.
 
 It will perhaps come as a shock to some, but in reading Barry more closely 
and without the intense bias that has gripped me right from the start when 
Barry appeared to make himself immune to the effects of my posts, I have 
concluded that essentially Barry is right. Right not just about Judy; but right 
about even myself... - Masked Zebra
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread Share Long
Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?




On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com 
steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this the 
best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as much 
a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?

But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting traps 
for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the umpteenth 
time) of what an honest person she is.  

That's a go figure if ever there was one.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:


On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... wrote:

But you know, of course, that he
completely repudiated what he'd written, right?

Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far
as I can tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But,
according to Judy and Ann, Robin told them in private email that it
was a joke on the rest of us. If that's true, then nobody on FFL
will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or says again. And, now
that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks on us
pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 

I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information
about my prior association with you before I started posting at FFL.
But I will take this as your need to express your hurt that I should
turn on you like this. Still, I think it was imprudent of you to do
this. But the damage is done, and we must live with it.

http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple days 
ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be mistaken 
for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail from Robin 
to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many private 
e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because she sort 
of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



 


 












[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a
couple days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin,
(not to be mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a
private e-mail from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated
e-mail, but one of many private e-mails she got from Robin).  I just
want to make that clear, because she sort of went on and on about it.

  Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of
e-mails from Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.

  There, finally got it out.

  I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin.


All of this makes me wonder whether the real reason he bailed on
Fairfield Life was that Judy was starting to stalk him via email the way
she's stalked so many people over the years on talk forums, and it was
freaking him out. Maybe he was afraid she'd show up outside his door in
Toronto.

It *does* sorta sound like she had -- and still has -- a rather
unhealthy obsession going with the guy, doesn't it?


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@ wrote:

  Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls
fooling other people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me.
Sounds a bit arrogant. And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are
these just her feelings on the matter?



  On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@ steve.sundur@
wrote:

Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin
consider this the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near
the top.  Judy said as much a few days ago.  Now what does that say
about a person, or persons that creating a parody just to see how many
people they can fool is what they consider great sport?


  But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of
setting traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse
(for the umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.


  That's a go figure if ever there was one.


 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@ wrote:

  On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@ mailto:authfriend@ wrote:

  But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd
written, right? 
  Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far
as I can tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according
to Judy and Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on
the rest of us. If that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe
anything Robin ever wrote or says again. And, now that we know that
Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks on us pricks, will we never
again believe anything they say on FFL.

  I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about
my prior association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I
will take this as your need to express your hurt that I should turn on
you like this. Still, I think it was imprudent of you to do this. But
the damage is done, and we must live with it.

 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/30\
0960
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/30\
0960




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
Boy, have you missed the boat. If we had intended to fool people, we would 
have done the whole thing entirely differently. The fun was in putting on an 
act, an over-the-top role-playing improvisation, for others to enjoy--which 
most people did. Only a few real knuckleheads were unable to recognize it for 
what it was. Nobody with any sense could have taken it seriously.
 

 Oh, hmmm, you took it seriously at first, didn't you? Well, like I said... 
 

 Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
That, lovely lady, is what we call in the trade a spin.  So aside from the 
persistent claims of your unflinching honesty and truthfulness, you are 
undermining it here, as you are wont to do on a regular basis.
 

 And then, (an this really is hilarious), you attempt to put the blame on ME, 
as to whether or not I did fall for your ploy.  And yes, I did initially give 
it credibility, as I don't typically assume people are trying to fool me.
 

 And just as I have seen you fall for misrepresentations that I spotted at the 
outset.
 

 Bottom line: You've got some serious re-evaluation to do on you persistent 
honesty claim.
 

 We'll wait
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Boy, have you missed the boat. If we had intended to fool people, we would 
have done the whole thing entirely differently. The fun was in putting on an 
act, an over-the-top role-playing improvisation, for others to enjoy--which 
most people did. Only a few real knuckleheads were unable to recognize it for 
what it was. Nobody with any sense could have taken it seriously.
 

 Oh, hmmm, you took it seriously at first, didn't you? Well, like I said... 
 

 Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
 







Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was relevant.
 

 (And remember, you got it completely, embarrassingly wrong about what was such 
fun for Robin and me. Yes, we did laugh privately at your stupidity in taking 
it seriously. We didn't expect anybody to be that brainless.)
 

  Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple 
days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be 
mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail 
from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many 
private e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because 
she sort of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



 


 














Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
That isn't what we were calling the most fun ever, you utter nitwit. See my 
post to Stevie, who is so out of it, and so consumed by hostility (as you are), 
that he made the same incredibly stupid mistake.
 

  Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling 
other people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit 
arrogant. And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings 
on the matter? 
 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 















Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
Actually, your saying it's a hoot is the hoot. Some people who have been 
switched to Neo are still able to access Classic; others are not. There's no 
figuring out involved for them; it's simply not possible. It has to do with 
how Yahoo's servers are set up, and eventually all traces of Classic will go 
away.
 

 If you had a way for all Neo folks to access Classic, quite literally 
thousands of people would be on their knees in gratitude to you (and nobody 
would be left using Neo).
 

 Now, if you want us to believe you are able to do something the rest of us 
should be able to do as well, I'm afraid you're going to have to tell us how 
you're doing it and let us take a shot at it. Otherwise you're just blowing 
smoke.
 

  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  
 

 Now, that is a hoot. 
 
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
The spin, I fear, is all in your head, Stevie-boy. I think I'll put up some 
excerpts to show those who never saw or don't remember the exchange how idiotic 
it is to think we were trying to fool people.
 

 I'm sorry you are so humiliated by having taken it all seriously when most 
people got that it was all in fun, but you really, really cannot blame your own 
failing in that regard on Robin and me.
 

 While I'm at it, please cite examples you believe undermine my claims of 
honesty. If I do it on a regular basis, that shouldn't be hard.
 

 Also cite examples of where I have fallen for misrepresentations that you 
spotted at the outset.
 

 (I'm asking pro forma, because I know you won't and can't.)
 

 That, lovely lady, is what we call in the trade a spin.  So aside from the 
persistent claims of your unflinching honesty and truthfulness, you are 
undermining it here, as you are wont to do on a regular basis.
 

 And then, (an this really is hilarious), you attempt to put the blame on ME, 
as to whether or not I did fall for your ploy.  And yes, I did initially give 
it credibility, as I don't typically assume people are trying to fool me.
 

 And just as I have seen you fall for misrepresentations that I spotted at the 
outset.
 

 Bottom line: You've got some serious re-evaluation to do on you persistent 
honesty claim.
 

 We'll wait
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Boy, have you missed the boat. If we had intended to fool people, we would 
have done the whole thing entirely differently. The fun was in putting on an 
act, an over-the-top role-playing improvisation, for others to enjoy--which 
most people did. Only a few real knuckleheads were unable to recognize it for 
what it was. Nobody with any sense could have taken it seriously.
 

 Oh, hmmm, you took it seriously at first, didn't you? Well, like I said... 
 

 Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
 









[FairfieldLife] Re: People are beginning to catch on

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
Um, doesn't seem to be happenng that nobody wants to argue with me, does it?
 

 Oh, dear, oh, dear, when are people going to begin to catch on?
 

 When is Barry going to catch on, for that matter? Anybody notice how many of 
his posts recently have been attempts to provoke me into arguing (including 
this one)?
 

 (Barry has been despondent because my post counts in recent weeks have been 
way too low for him to make a fuss about, so he's going to go wild with this 
one to make up for it.)
 

 BTW, Barry, (a) Robin's cult leader days were over decades ago; and (b) he 
never wrote a 13,000-word manifesto *demanding* that people argue with him. 
You really, really need to get a handle on your obsessive, paranoid fantasies. 
 

   What is she going to do when *no one* falls for her tarbaby act any more, 
and allows themselves to get 

  sucked into an argument with her just because she wants one?
 

  I predict panic.
 

 Fairfield Life Post Counter
 ===
 Start Date (UTC): 02/08/14 00:00:00
 End Date (UTC): 02/15/14 00:00:00
 304 messages as of (UTC) 02/09/14 23:44:16
 
 67 authfriend

Given an estimated 12-hour posting day, that's 2.8 posts per hour. Are we 
looking at another record posting week for the Judester?  :-)

Then again, look on the bright side. Maybe she'll follow her cult leader's lead 
and post a 13,000-word manifesto *demanding* that people argue with her...or 
else. And we all know what comes after that. Something to look forward to... 

 

:-)







Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad on Fairfield Life

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
What was a good catch, Share?
 

  Good catch, Judy.
 

 Say, Share, when are you going to acknowledge your embarrassing mistakes about 
my religious beliefs and what I wrote to Seraphita? Or are you just going to 
pretend that never happened?  

  Please emptybill, no salad in winter! The vata is already plenty vitiated! 
Namaste (-: 

 

 
 
 On Sunday, February 9, 2014 2:20 PM, emptybill@... emptybill@... wrote:
 
   ... with an irrational exuberance bordering on juvenile pathology. 

 

 Oh yeah ... did I add Share to your poison salad mix?

 

 Read it and froth.


 














 


 












Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was relevant.
 

 (And remember, you got it completely, embarrassingly wrong about what was such 
fun for Robin and me. Yes, we did laugh privately at your stupidity in taking 
it seriously. We didn't expect anybody to be that brainless.)
 

  Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple 
days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be 
mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail 
from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many 
private e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because 
she sort of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



 


 
















Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
Me thinks the hostility is on your end Sweetie.  Like, it's coming through loud 
and clear.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 That isn't what we were calling the most fun ever, you utter nitwit. See my 
post to Stevie, who is so out of it, and so consumed by hostility (as you are), 
that he made the same incredibly stupid mistake.
 

  Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling 
other people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit 
arrogant. And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings 
on the matter? 
 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 













 



[FairfieldLife] The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
For the record, Seraphita, note that Barry has no training in or special 
knowledge of abnormal psych and isn't in a position to diagnose anybody with 
NPD. Moreover, he has a habit of creating his own negative characterizations of 
Robin and then declaring them by fiat to be typical of NPD. I suspect this one 
is of that ilk.
 

 Robin may well have been suffering with NPD during his cult-leader days 
30-plus years ago, but Barry didn't know him then and so, again, wouldn't be in 
a position to say even if he did have the training to deliver a diagnosis.
 

 No reputable mental health professional, moreover, would hand out such a 
diagnosis based solely on a person's posts to an Internet forum.
 

 Barry's entire NPD formulation, where Robin or anybody else is concerned, is a 
scam, something he uses purely for purposes of demonizing people whom he finds 
threatening.
 

 The Robin who showed up on FFL a couple years ago did not fit any of the DSM-V 
criteria for NPD, BTW.
 

 Yes, Robin (today's Robin) did become very taken with various performers, 
including Gaga. That isn't exactly considered symptomatic of a personality 
disorder given how many people it happens to. Has nothing to do with his 
response to Khomeini decades ago.
 

 And to the best of my recollection, he never argued with anyone here about 
Gaga. Generally speaking, he was always clear and explicit that his takes on 
just about anything were his takes, not some gospel truth handed down from 
above.
 

 As for Gaga, he decided not long after he wrote what Barry quotes that she 
wasn't quite what he had thought she was. And he didn't blame the Vedic gods or 
anybody else for his misjudgment.
 

 IOW, this post of Barry's is just one more episode in his continuing series of 
demonization fantasies with regard to Robin.
 

 For the record, s3raphita, this projection of idealized fantasies onto 
Khomeini is pretty much standard Narcissistic Personality Disorder stuff, 
combined with mania. What happens is that the NPD individual, *lost* in 
self-obsession and convinced of how important *he* is to the world (we *are* 
talking about the person who billed himself as the World Teacher, after all) 
gets high on mania and looks at someone else and projects that same supposed 
grandiose greatness there. So for Robin, Khomeini became the same kind of 
God-directed leader he considered himself to be. 

 
But it's not *just* Khomeini he was a fan boy for. And the fan boy schtick was 
not *just* in the past. Robin did the same sort of fantasy projection on other 
people whom he chose to focus on during one of his manic states. 

For example, check out what he said about Lady Gaga back in June, 2011. It's 
the same schtick. And he carried on carrying on about it for some time, ready 
to argue with anyone who disputed *his* accurate view of Lady Gaga, because 
of course...they're wrong, and he's right. I suspect in a few years, when no 
one even remembers who Lady Gaga was, he'll issue a repudiation of what he 
wrote back in 2011, claiming similar levels of delusion. He'll probably even 
find a way to make his mania someone else's fault: Lingering influence from 
the Vedic demons who once convinced me I was enlightened made me write this 
stuff about Lady Gaga.  :-)  :-)  :-)

 My take? She is so passionate and devoted to her music—and her message (inner 
God-given dignity of every person: For God makes no mistakes BTW) comes 
through non-didactically, non-sentimentally. As you say, her effect on her 
little monsters is real. They can't help what happens to them during a LG 
performance—and I have been in a live audience watching her: she does more good 
for each person than TM ever did (if you will excuse the hyperbole, the 
bitterness, the outrageousness of that declaration—but for me, it's true). No 
one of course is 'transformed' but her effect seems to make people a little 
more sincere, a little more intelligent, a little more grounded. Although I 
doubt ANYONE knows just how she is doing this. For me, her dedication as an 
artist is pure and deathless, and this invites a grace which desexualizes her 
just to the right degree, while allowing her, non-egotistically to sacrifice 
herself inside her art. And the form and message of the art are one. That 
almost is unprecedented in my experience. (I have been a performer myself).

A woman dishabille and yet private lust for her is not permitted. This is 
because her art is (and the woman behind the art) so sincere and inspired that 
a certain chasteness secretly enters into the context—defying the very 
provocative and sexually uninhibited way she performs. Inside her performance—I 
have studied her carefully up-close—she is that good (as an artist) that she 
surrenders all of herself, and from within this posture of total giving, she is 
able to create an effect which defies analysis. People feel good, but it is not 
an escape, nor is it some kind of epiphany. She just works on you, and the 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
No, Judykins,
 

 I did not say you could post using the old format, only that you could access 
it, and use the search engine.  Calm down, and read again what I said.  Easy 
does it.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Actually, your saying it's a hoot is the hoot. Some people who have been 
switched to Neo are still able to access Classic; others are not. There's no 
figuring out involved for them; it's simply not possible. It has to do with 
how Yahoo's servers are set up, and eventually all traces of Classic will go 
away.
 

 If you had a way for all Neo folks to access Classic, quite literally 
thousands of people would be on their knees in gratitude to you (and nobody 
would be left using Neo).
 

 Now, if you want us to believe you are able to do something the rest of us 
should be able to do as well, I'm afraid you're going to have to tell us how 
you're doing it and let us take a shot at it. Otherwise you're just blowing 
smoke.
 

  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  
 

 Now, that is a hoot. 
 
 







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
Fine, so tell us how we Neo victims should all be able to access Classic and 
use its search function. We'll try it out and let you know whether it works for 
us.
 

 IOW, put up or shut up.
 

  No, Judykins,

 

 I did not say you could post using the old format, only that you could access 
it, and use the search engine.  Calm down, and read again what I said.  Easy 
does it. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Actually, your saying it's a hoot is the hoot. Some people who have been 
switched to Neo are still able to access Classic; others are not. There's no 
figuring out involved for them; it's simply not possible. It has to do with 
how Yahoo's servers are set up, and eventually all traces of Classic will go 
away.
 

 If you had a way for all Neo folks to access Classic, quite literally 
thousands of people would be on their knees in gratitude to you (and nobody 
would be left using Neo).
 

 Now, if you want us to believe you are able to do something the rest of us 
should be able to do as well, I'm afraid you're going to have to tell us how 
you're doing it and let us take a shot at it. Otherwise you're just blowing 
smoke.
 

  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  
 

 Now, that is a hoot. 
 
 









[FairfieldLife] Re: Marshy's Marketing

2014-02-10 Thread dhamiltony2k5
You guys minds are so crude. I am simply suggesting MJ “rectify” his wrong 
thinking that seems based on some evident poor experiences in his long 
profligate lost time past. Often times having one's meditation checked for 
effectiveness of spiritual experience can clear things up. A meditation 
checking can provide that insight of right experience and one's joining in the 
field effect of a group meditation with strong spiritually experienced 
meditators will too. Let's close the eyes, let's open the eyes, . . 
 
 
 I am sincerely concerned about your all having strayed so far in the anger of 
your thinking and feelings around what is the transcending meditative 
experience. I know from my own experience that you are losing a most precious 
opportunity of spiritual life on earth as what is the full intelligence of 
spirituality in the human physiology and a human life on earth. LIFE in the 
body, as the intelligence of the Unified Field in the Body. Waste not, wont 
not. Make Haste! 
 I extend my hand to help you as I can if you will take it,
 
 -U.S. Buck in the Dome  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote:
 
 Glad to be of service - laughin' is good! Next time I'm up in Canada (never 
 been actually) I'll give you a holler. As to Bucky I figgered maybe there was 
 some kinda jyotish rectification for straightening out one's attitude and 
 point of view - wait, that's believing everything a raja says!!!

 I would imagine that the nature of the rectification can be inferred from 
the root word rectal.  :-)

 



  
 On Mon, 2/10/14, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Marshy's Marketing
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Monday, February 10, 2014, 4:09 AM
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@
 wrote:
  
  and how do you
  propose I get a rectification?
 
 God,
 Michael, sometimes you make me laugh but good. I would love
 to meet you in real life; I'd be privileged to sample
 your baking and I'm sure we'd have a good chuckle or
 two.





Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
If you weren't so obnoxious in your stupidity, we would probably have been more 
compassionate. But you really set yourself up to be laughed at rather than 
pitied.
 

 BTW, it's peals, not peels. You're welcome.
 

 Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was relevant.
 

 (And remember, you got it completely, embarrassingly wrong about what was such 
fun for Robin and me. Yes, we did laugh privately at your stupidity in taking 
it seriously. We didn't expect anybody to be that brainless.)
 

  Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple 
days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be 
mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail 
from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many 
private e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because 
she sort of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



 


 


















Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Marshy's Marketing

2014-02-10 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote:

 Glad to be of service - laughin' is good! Next time I'm up in Canada (never 
been actually) I'll give you a holler. As to Bucky I figgered maybe there was 
some kinda jyotish rectification for straightening out one's attitude and point 
of view - wait, that's believing everything a raja says!!!
 

 Maybe you could make up for your sins by making an (e)rectification (giant 
statue) to one of the Raja living 'deities'. It could be installed in the town 
square with a plaque of dedication in your name. I am sure you will be forgiven 
then, allowed back into the fold of all-that's-happenin'-now.
 
 On Mon, 2/10/14, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... 
mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Marshy's Marketing
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Monday, February 10, 2014, 4:09 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
mjackson74@...
 wrote:
 
 and how do you
 propose I get a rectification?
 God,
 Michael, sometimes you make me laugh but good. I would love
 to meet you in real life; I'd be privileged to sample
 your baking and I'm sure we'd have a good chuckle or
 two.
 
 
 On Mon, 2/10/14, dhamiltony2k5@...
 dhamiltony2k5@...
 wrote:
 
 
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Marshy's Marketing
 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 Date: Monday, February 10, 2014, 1:00 AM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Om
 
 No, the teaching of transcending meditation is called
 
 initiative. 
 
 The new TM.org has initiative. What a crock of stinking
 dog
 
 manure
 
 you make as prediction here. You obviously need a
 
 rectification. 
 
 The meditative state of transcending meditation is not
 going
 
 to go
 
 away anytime soon for a long time never. Transcending
 
 meditation is
 
 a long way from over as the meditative state. The Unified
 
 Field is
 
 forever. You are fighting science. Repent your ways, 
 come
 
 back to
 
 meditation and join with a group meditation nearby
 
 you.Unconditional
 
 Surrender,
 
 
 
 -Buck
 
 in the Dome
 
 mjackson74
 
 writes:
 
 What
 
 you are seeing with the Movement is a very carefully
 
 orchestrated tactic to sanitize TM as much as possible to
 
 re-sell it to the ignorant masses. The idea of
 
 disassociating TM from Maharishi should be taken as an
 
 insult to him, if you really think he and what he did were
 
 the best thing since sliced bread, but I know you don't
 
 because you, like all TB'ers, will swallow anything the
 
 Movement tells you to swallow (except stuff in your case,
 
 that keeps people out of the Domes)
 
 
 
 
 
 This offering TM and no longer mentioning Marshy or
 
 minimizing his presence and role to the public is the same
 
 as not having any mention or presence of the rajas at MUM
 
 during Visitor's Weekend there. They are hiding what
 has
 
 been and what is. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Too bad for them, because you can't escape your karmic
 
 baggage forever - the excesses and unconscionable behavior
 
 of Marshy, Bevan, Hagelin and the Movement at large will be
 
 made public eventually and the general public will turn
 them
 
 out to pasture. When this happens, MUM will lose its
 
 accreditation, Girish and the Srivastavas boys will then
 
 sell the entire campus to developers who want to build some
 
 houses that make sense, the vastu buildings are all torn
 
 down, the Domes are used as grain storage silos until the
 
 grain dealers realize the Domes have mold problems and they
 
 are then torn down completely. Some former students will
 
 come to town right before they are demolished to have their
 
 pictures taken in front of the buildings they used to have
 
 sex on in the summertime. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Since the US is not contributing enough revenue for Girish,
 
 he will cease the payments to the American rajas who will
 
 then come camp out in YOUR pasture. Let's see how long
 
 you let them camp there. 
 
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, 2/9/14, dhamiltony2k5@...
 
 dhamiltony2k5@...
 
 wrote:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Marshy's Marketing
 
 
 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 
 
 Date: Sunday, February 9, 2014, 9:41 PM 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 MJ,
 
 
 
 Okay so you are not necessarily anti- transcending
 
 
 
 meditation
 
 
 
 although you are down in the mouth about some things TM and
 
 
 
 some
 
 
 
 people TM. And by what you are writing you feel Maharishi
 
 
 
 evidently
 
 
 
 morally compromised himself but responding to criticism
 
 like
 
 
 
 yours
 
 
 
 Maharishi has been taken out of the TM 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote:

 Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

 I am still finding it interesting that people find this minor incident on FFL 
so memorable and, well, prickly. My take on it (and I wasn't here yet) was that 
it was a highlight because it was just between those two and they were 
basically riffing off each other. I don't think anyone started out meaning to 
delude or trick anyone, it just turned out that some were more gullible than 
others. Or, as we know, some here are always looking for a means to create and 
perpetuate dissension and when they see what they think is a great opportunity 
and find they were hoodwinked (through no one's fault but their own) they 
become pissed off. Indeed, this little incident has sparked quite a firestorm, 
not by those who saw through it for the spontaneous little interaction it was, 
but for those who were hoping it meant something quite different and negative. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote:

 Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple days 
ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be mistaken 
for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail from Robin 
to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many private 
e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because she sort 
of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 Are you sure it wasn't me who said that? You do have a tendency to 
mis-remember all sorts of things. And I am not so sure Judy or I said in the 
most private of emails from Robin. An email is either a personal email and 
therefore private or it is not. I am not sure an email can be the most  
private of emails, that seems rather redundant. 
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin.
 

 I don't think you do either. Just as I don't think you realize how harping on 
about a basic non-event makes you look. Hint: petty and silly.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



 


 














Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
It's not working Judy.  This reflects much more on you than me, or anyone else. 
 I am sorry that it is causing you so much discomfort.  On the other hand, 
maybe that is positive. Perhaps it may push you to try reconcile your self 
image and the image others see.
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 If you weren't so obnoxious in your stupidity, we would probably have been 
more compassionate. But you really set yourself up to be laughed at rather than 
pitied.
 

 BTW, it's peals, not peels. You're welcome.
 

 Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was relevant.
 

 (And remember, you got it completely, embarrassingly wrong about what was such 
fun for Robin and me. Yes, we did laugh privately at your stupidity in taking 
it seriously. We didn't expect anybody to be that brainless.)
 

  Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple 
days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be 
mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail 
from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many 
private e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because 
she sort of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



 


 




















[FairfieldLife] Re: Marshy's Marketing

2014-02-10 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, dhamiltony2k5@... wrote:

 You guys minds are so crude. I am simply suggesting MJ “rectify” his wrong 
thinking that seems based on some evident poor experiences in his long 
profligate lost time past. Often times having one's meditation checked for 
effectiveness of spiritual experience can clear things up. A meditation 
checking can provide that insight of right experience and one's joining in the 
field effect of a group meditation with strong spiritually experienced 
meditators will too. Let's close the eyes, let's open the eyes, . .
 

 I am sincerely concerned about your all having strayed so far in the anger of 
your thinking and feelings around what is the transcending meditative 
experience. I know from my own experience that you are losing a most precious 
opportunity of spiritual life on earth as what is the full intelligence of 
spirituality in the human physiology and a human life on earth. LIFE in the 
body, as the intelligence of the Unified Field in the Body. Waste not, wont 
not. Make Haste!
 I extend my hand to help you as I can if you will take it,
 -U.S. Buck in the Dome  
 

 I have absolutely no negative reaction or feelings towards TM, MIU or MMY, 
Buck. Just because I choose not to meditate doesn't mean I revile the practice 
or its creator. It means I do not find it worth the time and trouble because I 
don't see the benefits. That is all. Not everyone who makes this choice is 
filled with vitriol and hate for TM or anything else associated with it. Can 
you register this fact? Just because many here have their issues doesn't mean I 
(or we) all do. And stopping the doing of something doesn't make one a quitter 
if one has considered carefully the reasons one is stopping. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson wrote:
 
 Glad to be of service - laughin' is good! Next time I'm up in Canada (never 
 been actually) I'll give you a holler. As to Bucky I figgered maybe there was 
 some kinda jyotish rectification for straightening out one's attitude and 
 point of view - wait, that's believing everything a raja says!!!

 I would imagine that the nature of the rectification can be inferred from 
the root word rectal.  :-)

 



  
 On Mon, 2/10/14, awoelflebater@... awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Marshy's Marketing
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Monday, February 10, 2014, 4:09 AM
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@
 wrote:
  
  and how do you
  propose I get a rectification?
 
 God,
 Michael, sometimes you make me laugh but good. I would love
 to meet you in real life; I'd be privileged to sample
 your baking and I'm sure we'd have a good chuckle or
 two.







[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
 
 Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past. And a couple days 
 ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be 
 mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail 
 from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many 
 private e-mails she got from Robin). I just want to make that clear, 
 because she sort of went on and on about it. 
 
 Anyway, where was I. Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
 Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL. 
 
 There, finally got it out. 
 
 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 


 All of this makes me wonder whether the real reason he bailed on Fairfield 
Life was that Judy was starting to stalk him via email the way she's stalked so 
many people over the years on talk forums, and it was freaking him out. Maybe 
he was afraid she'd show up outside his door in Toronto. 
 

 Can I put this post of Barry's in neon lights? This one has probably taken the 
proverbial cake. Eminent scholars take note - it doesn't get much better than 
this! Barry, there really is a God; I know this because if you knew how clearly 
your little theory indicates what you are inside you'd never show your deluded 
and ugly face here again. (Oh, and by the way, your theory stinks.)

It *does* sorta sound like she had -- and still has -- a rather unhealthy 
obsession going with the guy, doesn't it? 


  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@ wrote: 
 
 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
 people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit 
 arrogant. And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her 
 feelings on the matter? 
 
 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@ steve.sundur@ wrote: 
 
 Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
 the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top. Judy said as 
 much a few days ago. Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
 creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
 consider great sport? 
 
 
 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
 traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
 umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is. 
 
 
 That's a go figure if ever there was one. 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@ wrote: 
 
 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@ mailto:authfriend@ wrote: 
 
 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
 right?  
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
 tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
 Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. 
 If that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever 
 wrote or says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are 
 playing tricks on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on 
 FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my 
 prior association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take 
 this as your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. 
 Still, I think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, 
 and we must live with it. 
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960





Re: [FairfieldLife] Taliban Readies 500 Female Suicide Bombers

2014-02-10 Thread Mike Dixon
The big question... do they get 72 virgins(or one Justin Beiber) when they blow 
themselves up?  Bet not. I'd bet they are stuck with the loser of a hubby that 
got his ars killed, making them widows, in the first place.




On Sunday, February 9, 2014 9:54 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com 
wrote:
  
  
This is a new development in the insanity of fanaticism.  Women are being used 
now like drones to kill other people.  But they're not allowed to be educated 
according to sharia law which they want to impose in Pakistan.  Does that make 
sense?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-09/pakistan-taliban-readies-500-female-suicide-bombers-cleric-says.html?cmpid=yhoo
  
 

[FairfieldLife] The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
Stevie, the only discomfort this is causing me is in my stomach muscles, 
which hurt from laughing so hard.
 

  It's not working Judy.  This reflects much more on you than me, or anyone 
else.  I am sorry that it is causing you so much discomfort.  On the other 
hand, maybe that is positive. Perhaps it may push you to try reconcile your 
self image and the image others see.
 

 If you weren't so obnoxious in your stupidity, we would probably have been 
more compassionate. But you really set yourself up to be laughed at rather than 
pitied.
 

 BTW, it's peals, not peels. You're welcome. 
 

 Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was relevant.
 

 (And remember, you got it completely, embarrassingly wrong about what was such 
fun for Robin and me. Yes, we did laugh privately at your stupidity in taking 
it seriously. We didn't expect anybody to be that brainless.)
 

  Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple 
days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be 
mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail 
from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many 
private e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because 
she sort of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



 


 






















[FairfieldLife] Re: Marshy's Marketing

2014-02-10 Thread anartaxius
'Rectification', when applied to any situation, hypothesis, calculation, or 
theory is an indication that something is wrong, that some piece of information 
or knowledge is missing from the system under consideration, because the 
expected result did not appear. In science this usually means going back to the 
'drawing board' and starting over since the idea was dis-confirmed. 
Rectification is the attempt to fudge the result in some way in order to 
maintain that the original idea is correct, but unless very carefully done with 
due diligence to the entire edifice, it typically is an act of intellectual 
dishonestly. Science generally proceeds this way - the idea is wrong, doesn't 
work right, so another is tried until a good stable theory is worked out. In 
spiritual matters it usually means cognitive dissonance is a work in an attempt 
to make the original idea come off clean, when in fact it has not. 
Psychologically it is difficult to avoid this because we humans do not like to 
be wrong, even though we tend to be wrong a good part of the time.


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
He's mostly right this time. I did say it was the most fun either of us ever 
had on FFL. But I didn't say anything about any particular email from Robin.
 

 BTW, sometimes I refer to private emails (didn't this time) simply because 
some people call forum posts emails, I guess because they get the posts via 
email rather than going to the Web site.

 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 Are you sure it wasn't me who said that? You do have a tendency to 
mis-remember all sorts of things. And I am not so sure Judy or I said in the 
most private of emails from Robin. An email is either a personal email and 
therefore private or it is not. I am not sure an email can be the most private 
of emails, that seems rather redundant. 
 














[FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
Judy this may be hard for your to understand, but spending time trying to trick 
people, and then finding it to be the most fun you've had in the setting in 
which you trick the people, is not something really to be proud of.
 

 But that may be indicative of your emotional make up, and the emotional make 
up of Robin.
 

 But to each his own.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Stevie, the only discomfort this is causing me is in my stomach muscles, 
which hurt from laughing so hard.
 

  It's not working Judy.  This reflects much more on you than me, or anyone 
else.  I am sorry that it is causing you so much discomfort.  On the other 
hand, maybe that is positive. Perhaps it may push you to try reconcile your 
self image and the image others see.
 

 If you weren't so obnoxious in your stupidity, we would probably have been 
more compassionate. But you really set yourself up to be laughed at rather than 
pitied.
 

 BTW, it's peals, not peels. You're welcome. 
 

 Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was relevant.
 

 (And remember, you got it completely, embarrassingly wrong about what was such 
fun for Robin and me. Yes, we did laugh privately at your stupidity in taking 
it seriously. We didn't expect anybody to be that brainless.)
 

  Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple 
days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be 
mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail 
from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many 
private e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because 
she sort of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



 


 















(Message over 64 KB, truncated)










[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoe wrote:

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote:
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, someone wrote:
   
   Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past. And a
couple days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin,
(not to be mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a
private e-mail from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated
e-mail, but one of many private e-mails she got from Robin). I just
want to make that clear, because she sort of went on and on about it.
   
   Anyway, where was I. Oh yes, she said, in this most private of
e-mails from Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
  
   There, finally got it out.
 
   I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and
Robin.
  
   All of this makes me wonder whether the real reason he bailed on
Fairfield Life was that Judy was starting to stalk him via email the way
she's stalked so many people over the years on talk forums, and it was
freaking him out. Maybe he was afraid she'd show up outside his door in
Toronto.

  Can I put this post of Barry's in neon lights? This one has probably
taken the proverbial cake. Eminent scholars take note - it doesn't get
much better than this! Barry, there really is a God; I know this because
if you knew how clearly your little theory indicates what you are inside
you'd never show your deluded and ugly face here again. (Oh, and by the
way, your theory stinks.)

Ahem.

Says the woman who essentially stalked the cult leader she was enamored
with 30 years ago -- who dumped her publicly and humiliatingly -- to
Fairfield Life and attempted to take up where she'd left off with him
again. Now she's one of his two only champions and defenders here on
FFL, acting...dare I say it...as if she'd become his cult follower
again.

Go figure. I mean, really...go figure.





[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
You know, the interesting thing is, I don't recall Barry making any comments 
about Robin's and my irony duel. One would think he'd have jumped on it if it 
gave him an opportunity to make trouble between me and Robin, or even to say 
disparaging things about the humor. (If you or anyone else remembers a post of 
his on this topic, I'd appreciate a reminder, but I noted the absence of such 
quite some time ago.) Even with the current hoo-hah, he hasn't said anything 
about it. He has mentioned it obliquely in connection with his ridiculous 
contention that irony is lying, but that's about it.
 

 I suspect (and he'll deny it, of course) that he never mentions it because he 
doesn't want to call any more attention than necessary to an irony piece that 
was so much funnier than any of his own attempts (IMHO, of course).
 

 As to his current inadvertently hilarious comment quoted below, in the past 
he's made a big point of how Robin and I didn't engage with each other all that 
much on FFL, and how this showed Robin's indifference toward me. Now that he 
knows Robin and I were in private communication for much of the time Robin was 
posting here, he's having to backtrack and strike out in new directions to find 
a way to make his attacks.
 

 All of this makes me wonder whether the real reason he bailed on Fairfield 
Life was that Judy was starting to stalk him via email the way she's stalked so 
many people over the years on talk forums, and it was freaking him out. Maybe 
he was afraid she'd show up outside his door in Toronto.
 

 Can I put this post of Barry's in neon lights? This one has probably taken the 
proverbial cake. Eminent scholars take note - it doesn't get much better than 
this! Barry, there really is a God; I know this because if you knew how clearly 
your little theory indicates what you are inside you'd never show your deluded 
and ugly face here again. (Oh, and by the way, your theory stinks.)
 
It *does* sorta sound like she had -- and still has -- a rather unhealthy 
obsession going with the guy, doesn't it? 


  ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@ wrote: 
 
 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
 people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit 
 arrogant. And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her 
 feelings on the matter? 
 
 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@ steve.sundur@ wrote: 
 
 Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
 the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top. Judy said as 
 much a few days ago. Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
 creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
 consider great sport? 
 
 
 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
 traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
 umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is. 
 
 
 That's a go figure if ever there was one. 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@ wrote: 
 
 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@ mailto:authfriend@ wrote: 
 
 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
 right?  
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
 tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
 Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. 
 If that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever 
 wrote or says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are 
 playing tricks on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on 
 FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my 
 prior association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take 
 this as your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. 
 Still, I think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, 
 and we must live with it. 
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960







[FairfieldLife] Stevie thinks this was an attempt to fool people, 1 of 2

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
This was my response to Robin's first post in what we called our irony duel, 
in which he declared that he was switching his allegiance from me to Barry.
 

Traitor. Turncoat.

After working with me for 17 years now to discredit
Barry, staying discreetly behind the scenes until
just recently, you've decided to switch sides.

Or were you on his side all along, acting as a double
agent, setting me up for this odious betrayal?

That was the plan all along, wasn't it?

It all becomes clear to me now. Your masters trained
you well in the art of deception; I never suspected.

But it hardly matters. The damage you've done with
this post is well-nigh irreparable. Almost two decades
of exhausting labor to counter everything Barry says,
even what he says outside the context of TM, everything
his *allies* say, straight down the tubes.

I imagine you're pretty proud of yourself right about
now. For in the end, I assure you, Barry will be
vindicated.

Yes, you've bloody well made sure of that, haven't you?

Barry is the martyr here.

No, *Judy* is the martyr here. But her blood, her
sweat, her toil, her unswerving devotion to the cause, 
will not go unavenged. Enjoy your moment of triumph, 
for it will not, it cannot last.

Would you even just for the sake of how much I have
defended you in the past, think about what I have said 
here?

Yes, I most certainly will think about it. And so will 
others, the Others for whom I've been tirelessly 
working, whose power is more vast than you dream. You 
may be certain they've taken note of your perfidy, and 
there will be, not a reconciliation, as you so fondly 
imagine, but a showdown and a reckoning. Your masters 
have overreached themselves and in so doing wrought 
their own destruction.

Count on it...and tremble.


OR (your choice):


I grovel here before you, the bitter dust of
humiliation filling my mouth as I struggle to 
formulate the words of my repentance.

There are none so blind as those who will not see.
That was me, right up until the moment I read this 
post.

I am still blinded, but now by the light, the blessed 
light of Truth.

I dare not hope for reconciliation; my sins have been 
too great for that. I can only pray that those whom I 
have so grievously misled through my own hubris will 
understand and accept what you have laid out before 
them at such personal cost and repudiate the Cult of 
Judy. For it is dead; Robin has slain it.

Robin, I cannot express my boundless gratitude for
the selflessness of the holy work you have just
accomplished here. In the pain with which it has
seared my very soul may others find sweet release.

Now let us all together, cleansed of our hatred and 
joined in our determination to march forth into
sanctified renewal, repeat the beautiful prayer the
Devoted Brother Vaj has composed for us on this
awesome occasion:

Hail Barry, full of Grace, Blessed be the fruit of his 
thumbs.

Can I get an -MEN?

Hallelujah!
 
 

 

 

 https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/301020 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/301020



[FairfieldLife] Re: Marshy's Marketing

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 'Rectification', when applied to any situation, hypothesis,
calculation, or theory is an indication that something is wrong, that
some piece of information or knowledge is missing from the system under
consideration, because the expected result did not appear. In science
this usually means going back to the 'drawing board' and starting over
since the idea was dis-confirmed. Rectification is the attempt to fudge
the result in some way in order to maintain that the original idea is
correct, but unless very carefully done with due diligence to the entire
edifice, it typically is an act of intellectual dishonestly. Science
generally proceeds this way - the idea is wrong, doesn't work right, so
another is tried until a good stable theory is worked out. In spiritual
matters it usually means cognitive dissonance is a work in an attempt to
make the original idea come off clean, when in fact it has not.
Psychologically it is difficult to avoid this because we humans do not
like to be wrong, even though we tend to be wrong a good part of the
time.

Well said. I've never understood the near-pathological fear of admitting
they were w...w...w...wrong some people seem to have.

I mean, isn't saying that you've never been wrong another way of saying,
I've never learned anything?







[FairfieldLife] Re: Stevie thinks this was an attempt to fool people, 1 of 2

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB

Ahem.

Both Judy and (if her word is to be trusted as to what occurred in their
private mails) Robin have said that this exchange of parodies was the
most fun they've had at FFL.

Isn't it fascinating that their shared concept of most fun is
obsessing about Barry?

:-)

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 This was my response to Robin's first post in what we called our
irony duel, in which he declared that he was switching his allegiance
from me to Barry.


 Traitor. Turncoat.

 After working with me for 17 years now to discredit
 Barry, staying discreetly behind the scenes until
 just recently, you've decided to switch sides.

 Or were you on his side all along, acting as a double
 agent, setting me up for this odious betrayal?

 That was the plan all along, wasn't it?

 It all becomes clear to me now. Your masters trained
 you well in the art of deception; I never suspected.

 But it hardly matters. The damage you've done with
 this post is well-nigh irreparable. Almost two decades
 of exhausting labor to counter everything Barry says,
 even what he says outside the context of TM, everything
 his *allies* say, straight down the tubes.

 I imagine you're pretty proud of yourself right about
 now. For in the end, I assure you, Barry will be
 vindicated.

 Yes, you've bloody well made sure of that, haven't you?

 Barry is the martyr here.

 No, *Judy* is the martyr here. But her blood, her
 sweat, her toil, her unswerving devotion to the cause,
 will not go unavenged. Enjoy your moment of triumph,
 for it will not, it cannot last.

 Would you even just for the sake of how much I have
 defended you in the past, think about what I have said
 here?

 Yes, I most certainly will think about it. And so will
 others, the Others for whom I've been tirelessly
 working, whose power is more vast than you dream. You
 may be certain they've taken note of your perfidy, and
 there will be, not a reconciliation, as you so fondly
 imagine, but a showdown and a reckoning. Your masters
 have overreached themselves and in so doing wrought
 their own destruction.

 Count on it...and tremble.


 OR (your choice):


 I grovel here before you, the bitter dust of
 humiliation filling my mouth as I struggle to
 formulate the words of my repentance.

 There are none so blind as those who will not see.
 That was me, right up until the moment I read this
 post.

 I am still blinded, but now by the light, the blessed
 light of Truth.

 I dare not hope for reconciliation; my sins have been
 too great for that. I can only pray that those whom I
 have so grievously misled through my own hubris will
 understand and accept what you have laid out before
 them at such personal cost and repudiate the Cult of
 Judy. For it is dead; Robin has slain it.

 Robin, I cannot express my boundless gratitude for
 the selflessness of the holy work you have just
 accomplished here. In the pain with which it has
 seared my very soul may others find sweet release.

 Now let us all together, cleansed of our hatred and
 joined in our determination to march forth into
 sanctified renewal, repeat the beautiful prayer the
 Devoted Brother Vaj has composed for us on this
 awesome occasion:

 Hail Barry, full of Grace, Blessed be the fruit of his
 thumbs.

 Can I get an -MEN?

 Hallelujah!







 
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/3\
01020
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/3\
01020




[FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
I totally agree with you. It's an astute observation. 

 Unfortunately, it doesn't apply to Robin's and my irony duel. I'm afraid 
you're going to have to find another way to vent your hostility.
 

  Judy this may be hard for your to understand, but spending time trying to 
trick people, and then finding it to be the most fun you've had in the 
setting in which you trick the people, is not something really to be proud of. 

 But that may be indicative of your emotional make up, and the emotional make 
up of Robin.
 

 But to each his own. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Stevie, the only discomfort this is causing me is in my stomach muscles, 
which hurt from laughing so hard.
 

  It's not working Judy.  This reflects much more on you than me, or anyone 
else.  I am sorry that it is causing you so much discomfort.  On the other 
hand, maybe that is positive. Perhaps it may push you to try reconcile your 
self image and the image others see.
 

 If you weren't so obnoxious in your stupidity, we would probably have been 
more compassionate. But you really set yourself up to be laughed at rather than 
pitied.
 

 BTW, it's peals, not peels. You're welcome. 
 

 Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was relevant.
 

 (And remember, you got it completely, embarrassingly wrong about what was such 
fun for Robin and me. Yes, we did laugh privately at your stupidity in taking 
it seriously. We didn't expect anybody to be that brainless.)
 

  Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple 
days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be 
mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail 
from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many 
private e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because 
she sort of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



 


 

























[FairfieldLife] The tour of Versailles I'd like to take

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB

The palace is actually kinda gaudy. But this is cool.


 
http://content.messynessychic.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/underversa\
illed.jpg
Seen here are the underground resevoirs underneath the Palace of 
Versailles. Once a year on `maintenance day', the water parterre
reservoirs are emptied a few weeks before the Fountains show.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Stevie thinks this was an attempt to fool people, 1 of 2

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
Oh, there's so much more than that in these posts. Interesting that all you 
could see was the bits about you.
 

 Ahem.
 
Both Judy and (if her word is to be trusted as to what occurred in their 
private mails) Robin have said that this exchange of parodies was the most 
fun they've had at FFL.

Isn't it fascinating that their shared concept of most fun is obsessing 
about Barry?

 :-)


 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:

 This was my response to Robin's first post in what we called our irony 
 duel, in which he declared that he was switching his allegiance from me to 
 Barry. 
 
 
 Traitor. Turncoat. 
 
 After working with me for 17 years now to discredit 
 Barry, staying discreetly behind the scenes until 
 just recently, you've decided to switch sides. 
 
 Or were you on his side all along, acting as a double 
 agent, setting me up for this odious betrayal? 
 
 That was the plan all along, wasn't it? 
 
 It all becomes clear to me now. Your masters trained 
 you well in the art of deception; I never suspected. 
 
 But it hardly matters. The damage you've done with 
 this post is well-nigh irreparable. Almost two decades 
 of exhausting labor to counter everything Barry says, 
 even what he says outside the context of TM, everything 
 his *allies* say, straight down the tubes. 
 
 I imagine you're pretty proud of yourself right about 
 now. For in the end, I assure you, Barry will be 
 vindicated. 
 
 Yes, you've bloody well made sure of that, haven't you? 
 
 Barry is the martyr here. 
 
 No, *Judy* is the martyr here. But her blood, her 
 sweat, her toil, her unswerving devotion to the cause, 
 will not go unavenged. Enjoy your moment of triumph, 
 for it will not, it cannot last. 
 
 Would you even just for the sake of how much I have 
 defended you in the past, think about what I have said 
 here? 
 
 Yes, I most certainly will think about it. And so will 
 others, the Others for whom I've been tirelessly 
 working, whose power is more vast than you dream. You 
 may be certain they've taken note of your perfidy, and 
 there will be, not a reconciliation, as you so fondly 
 imagine, but a showdown and a reckoning. Your masters 
 have overreached themselves and in so doing wrought 
 their own destruction. 
 
 Count on it...and tremble. 
 
 
 OR (your choice): 
 
 
 I grovel here before you, the bitter dust of 
 humiliation filling my mouth as I struggle to 
 formulate the words of my repentance. 
 
 There are none so blind as those who will not see. 
 That was me, right up until the moment I read this 
 post. 
 
 I am still blinded, but now by the light, the blessed 
 light of Truth. 
 
 I dare not hope for reconciliation; my sins have been 
 too great for that. I can only pray that those whom I 
 have so grievously misled through my own hubris will 
 understand and accept what you have laid out before 
 them at such personal cost and repudiate the Cult of 
 Judy. For it is dead; Robin has slain it. 
 
 Robin, I cannot express my boundless gratitude for 
 the selflessness of the holy work you have just 
 accomplished here. In the pain with which it has 
 seared my very soul may others find sweet release. 
 
 Now let us all together, cleansed of our hatred and 
 joined in our determination to march forth into 
 sanctified renewal, repeat the beautiful prayer the 
 Devoted Brother Vaj has composed for us on this 
 awesome occasion: 
 
 Hail Barry, full of Grace, Blessed be the fruit of his 
 thumbs. 
 
 Can I get an -MEN? 
 
 Hallelujah! 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/301020 
 https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/301020





[FairfieldLife] Polar Plunge 2014 . Fairfield Parks and Recreation - YouTube

2014-02-10 Thread Rick Archer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFQpBBuWdY8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFQpBBuWdY8feature=youtu.be
feature=youtu.be 



[FairfieldLife] RE: The tour of Versailles I'd like to take

2014-02-10 Thread anartaxius


 Wow, what a nice photograph. Looks like it was professionally lit.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 The palace is actually kinda gaudy. But this is cool.

 
http://content.messynessychic.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/underversailled.jpg
 Seen here are the underground resevoirs underneath the Palace of Versailles. 
Once a year on `maintenance day', the water parterre reservoirs are emptied a 
few weeks before the Fountains show.






Re: [FairfieldLife] Taliban Readies 500 Female Suicide Bombers

2014-02-10 Thread Share Long
John and Mike, I wonder how willing these women are and why. Mike, are they 
really widows? Are they being given an impossible choice? Be a suicide bomber 
or die a slow death as an outcast?





On Sunday, February 9, 2014 11:54 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com 
wrote:
 
  
This is a new development in the insanity of fanaticism.  Women are being used 
now like drones to kill other people.  But they're not allowed to be educated 
according to sharia law which they want to impose in Pakistan.  Does that make 
sense?

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-09/pakistan-taliban-readies-500-female-suicide-bombers-cleric-says.html?cmpid=yhoo



Re: [FairfieldLife] First star discovered!

2014-02-10 Thread Share Long
Wow, salyavin, thanks for posting this, very cool. I love how science can show 
how amazing the universe is. 





On Monday, February 10, 2014 12:24 AM, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:
 
  






Australian astronomers discover oldest known star in universe
13.6bn-year-old heavenly body is a time capsule that allows scientists to study 
the chemistry of the first stars The star discovered with the SkyMapper 
telescope at the Siding Spring observatory near Coonabarabran. Photograph: 
Space Telescope Science Institute/AAP
A team of scientists at the Australian National University has discovered the 
oldest known star in the universe.

The discovery of the heavenly body, which formed about 13.6bn years ago, has 
allowed astronomers to study the chemistry of the first stars.
Lead researcher Dr Stefan Keller of the ANU’s Research School of Astronomy and 
Astrophysics called the find a “one in a 60m chance”.
“I was pleasantly surprised,” Keller said. “It was very much a 
needle-in-a-haystack situation.”
The team discovered the star using the university’s SkyMapper telescope at the 
Siding Spring observatory near Coonabarabran in northern New South Wales.
The wide-field telescope is being used to search for ancient stars as part of a 
project to produce the first digital map of the southern sky.
At the heart of the telescope is a digital camera that uses 268m pixels to 
capture an area of sky 29 times larger than the full moon every minute.
“Just by imaging the colours of stars, we can tell which stars are prime 
candidates of being the oldest,” Keller said. “We can tell how much iron it has 
– the more iron, the younger the star.
“In the case of the star we have announced, the amount of iron present is a 
factor of at least 60 times less than any other star.”
He described the discovery as a “time capsule” providing new information that 
defied earlier beliefs about some of the first stars.
He said the newly discovered star had formed in the wake of a primordial star, 
which had a mass of 60 times that of the sun and died in a supernova explosion.
Keller and his team’s discovery, which was confirmed using the Magellan 
telescope in Chile, is published in the latest edition of Nature.

From the Grauniad.


[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoe wrote:
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote: 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, someone wrote: 
   
   Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past. And a couple 
   days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to 
   be mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private 
   e-mail from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one 
   of many private e-mails she got from Robin). I just want to make that 
   clear, because she sort of went on and on about it. 
  
   Anyway, where was I. Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails 
   from Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL. 
  
   There, finally got it out. 
  
   I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 
  
  All of this makes me wonder whether the real reason he bailed on Fairfield 
  Life was that Judy was starting to stalk him via email the way she's 
  stalked so many people over the years on talk forums, and it was freaking 
  him out. Maybe he was afraid she'd show up outside his door in Toronto. 
 
 Can I put this post of Barry's in neon lights? This one has probably taken 
 the proverbial cake. Eminent scholars take note - it doesn't get much better 
 than this! Barry, there really is a God; I know this because if you knew how 
 clearly your little theory indicates what you are inside you'd never show 
 your deluded and ugly face here again. (Oh, and by the way, your theory 
 stinks.) 

 Ahem. 

Says the woman who essentially stalked the cult leader she was enamored with 30 
years ago -- who dumped her publicly and humiliatingly -- to Fairfield Life and 
attempted to take up where she'd left off with him again. Now she's one of his 
two only champions and defenders here on FFL, acting...dare I say it...as if 
she'd become his cult follower again. 

Go figure. I mean, really...go figure. 
 

 Just to reiterate: There is a God and you should be grateful for that Bawwy. 
Only Judy, Robin and I know how truly ridiculous, farcical you really are. 
You'll go to your grave taking yourself as seriously as you do not realizing 
those watching you go are clutching their sides and howling with laughter. 






[FairfieldLife] Re: Polar Plunge 2014 . Fairfield Parks and Recreation - YouTube

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer  wrote:

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFQpBBuWdY8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QFQpBBuWdY8

And to think, people used to bitch about wearing wet dhotis as a
technique to keep themselves un-horny and on the program.  :-)







[FairfieldLife] RE: The tour of Versailles I'd like to take

2014-02-10 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 Barry sez: The palace is actually kinda gaudy. 
 

 Perhaps the understatement of the Century. Versailles, gaudy? It is only the 
epitomy of French Baroque style of architecture which happens to be some of the 
most candy-floss, over-the-top gilt and ornamentation encrusted palace in 
existence. I guess you could say it's kinda gaudy alright.
 

 

 

 

 

 But this is cool.

 
http://content.messynessychic.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/underversailled.jpg
 Seen here are the underground resevoirs underneath the Palace of Versailles. 
Once a year on `maintenance day', the water parterre reservoirs are emptied a 
few weeks before the Fountains show.






[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoe wrote:
   
   
   Can I put this post of Barry's in neon lights? This one has
probably taken the proverbial cake. Eminent scholars take note - it
doesn't get much better than this! Barry, there really is a God; I know
this because if you knew how clearly your little theory indicates what
you are inside you'd never show your deluded and ugly face here again.
(Oh, and by the way, your theory stinks.)
  
   Ahem.
   
  Says the woman who essentially stalked the cult leader she was
enamored with 30 years ago -- who dumped her publicly and humiliatingly
-- to Fairfield Life and attempted to take up where she'd left off with
him again. Now she's one of his two only champions and defenders here on
FFL, acting...dare I say it...as if she'd become his cult follower
again.
   
  Go figure. I mean, really...go figure.


  Just to reiterate: There is a God and you should be grateful for that
Bawwy. Only Judy, Robin and I know how truly ridiculous, farcical you
really are. You'll go to your grave taking yourself as seriously as you
do not realizing those watching you go are clutching their sides and
howling with laughter.


That's quite a tight and elite group you've got there, Ann. The only
ones who know the truth are you, Judy, and Robin. It almost sounds as if
you're describing a cult.  :-)





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: People are beginning to catch on

2014-02-10 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 2/10/2014 2:23 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

*/Given an estimated 12-hour posting day, that's 2.8 posts per hour./*


It takes only a few seconds to read and respond to a message posted to 
FFL, since most of them don't amount to very much anyway. If you want 
you could respond to each and every post in real-time by setting your 
email client to sound a beep sound alerting you to new mail - that way, 
you could respond in a more timely manner to all the queries and 
untruths that are posted. Go figure.


It takes only a few minutes to read even a long post like Robin posted. 
If you've got a broadband connection and a good email client like 
Thunderbird anyone could post hundreds of messages a day to various 
discussion groups. It's not complicated to be a nerd top-poster. You 
could do it if you could just put more focus into it and concentrate on 
what you are doing. Try to F O C U S, Barry.


All you need to do is get yourself situated in your bedroom upstairs 
with your laptop and a few dogs or cats and you could be reading the 
internet all day and night too. Or, just get employment in a job where 
you are at a computer connected to the internet all day and you could do 
some multi-tasking while you are coding or editing, maybe switching 
windows up and down. A really dedicated nerd-poster would have two 
computer monitors hooked up so as to have a dedicated screen just to 
monitor all the posts sent to FFL.


However, if you want to be a serious informant to a discussion group, 
you would be working at home out of a home office near the ocean with a 
window you can look out of to see the sea. You could take some bathroom 
breaks if you take your smart phone with you, or if you wanted to take a 
city bus to a store to get some supplies, you could take a tablet with 
you if you wanted to. It's all a matter of positioning and placement.


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Country Chuckles

2014-02-10 Thread Pundit Sir
A closed mouth gathers no foot. - Will Rogers


On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

 The quickest way to double your money is to fold it in half and put it
 back in your pocket. - Will Rogers


 On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:



 Richard, and some days you are the imploding space between the two!




   On Saturday, February 8, 2014 7:46 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield.- Will
 Rogers


 On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

 Good judgment comes from bad experience, and a lot of that comes from
 bad judgment.- Will Rogers


 On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

 If you drink, don't park; accidents cause people. - Will Rogers


 On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:


  Hey Richard, I just found out that Will Rogers was Native American or
 what the Canadians call First Nations. What a wonderful thinker he was.
 Thanks so much for posting these.




   On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 8:51 AM, Pundit Sir 
 pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

  If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything. - Will
 Rogers


 On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

 Don't squat with your spurs on.- Will Rogers


 On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

 If you lend someone $20, and never see that person again, it was
 probably worth it. - Will Rogers


 On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

 Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach him to fish, and he
 will sit in a boat and drink beer all day. - Will Rogers


 On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:


  LOL, Richard, thanks, hope you have a good week...




   On Sunday, February 2, 2014 10:10 PM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you. - Will Rogers


 On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Richard Williams 
 pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.
 That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their
 shoes. - Will Rogers


 On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car
 payments. - Will Rogers


 On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 It is far more impressive when others discover your good qualities
 without your help.- Will Rogers


 On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:


  Another great Will Rogers quote, Richard, thanks




   On Friday, January 31, 2014 7:51 PM, Richard Williams 
 pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

  It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a
 warning to others.- Will Rogers


 On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.comwrote:


  Wonderful, LOL, thanks Richard. Thanks to Will too (-:




   On Friday, January 31, 2014 9:22 AM, Richard Williams 
 pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

  Never test the depth of the water with both feet. - Will Rogers


 On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Richard Williams 
 pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 Don't be irreplaceable. If you can't be replaced, you can't be
 promoted.- Will Rogers


 On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Richard Williams 
 pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 It's always darkest before dawn. So if you're going to steal your
 neighbor's newspaper, that's the time to do it. - Will Rogers


 On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Richard Williams 
 pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 In case you are worried about what is going to become of the younger
 generation, it is going to grow up and start worrying about the younger
 generation.


 On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Richard Williams 
 pundits...@gmail.comwrote:

 Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.- Will Rogers


 On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com
  wrote:

 On 1/7/2014 6:01 PM, Richard Williams wrote:

 The journey of a thousand miles begins with a broken fan belt and a
 leaky tire. - Will Rogers


































Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Country Chuckles

2014-02-10 Thread Share Long
Keep 'em coming Richard and thank you...





On Monday, February 10, 2014 10:47 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  
A closed mouth gathers no foot. - Will Rogers



On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

The quickest way to double your money is to fold it in half and put it back in 
your pocket. - Will Rogers



On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:

 
  
Richard, and some days you are the imploding space between the two!







On Saturday, February 8, 2014 7:46 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 
  
Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield.- Will Rogers



On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

Good judgment comes from bad experience, and a lot of that comes from bad 
judgment.- Will Rogers



On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

If you drink, don't park; accidents cause people. - Will Rogers




On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:

 
  
Hey Richard, I just found out that Will Rogers was Native American or what 
the Canadians call First Nations. What a wonderful thinker he was. Thanks 
so much for posting these.







On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 8:51 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com 
wrote:
 
  
If you tell the truth, you don't have to remember anything. - Will Rogers



On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

Don't squat with your spurs on.- Will Rogers



On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

If you lend someone $20, and never see that person again, it was 
probably worth it. - Will Rogers



On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Pundit Sir pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day. Teach him to fish, and he 
will sit in a boat and drink beer all day. - Will Rogers



On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com 
wrote:

 
  
LOL, Richard, thanks, hope you have a good week...







On Sunday, February 2, 2014 10:10 PM, Pundit Sir 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  
If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you. - Will 
Rogers



On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Richard Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. 
That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have 
their shoes. - Will Rogers



On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Richard Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of 
car payments. - Will Rogers



On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Richard Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

It is far more impressive when others discover your good qualities 
without your help.- Will Rogers



On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com 
wrote:

 
  
Another great Will Rogers quote, Richard, thanks







On Friday, January 31, 2014 7:51 PM, Richard Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  
It may be that your sole purpose in life is simply to serve as a 
warning to others.- Will Rogers




On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Share Long 
sharelon...@yahoo.com wrote:

 
  
Wonderful, LOL, thanks Richard. Thanks to Will too (-:







On Friday, January 31, 2014 9:22 AM, Richard Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  
Never test the depth of the water with both feet. - Will Rogers



On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Richard Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

Don't be irreplaceable. If you can't be replaced, you can't be 
promoted.- Will Rogers



On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Richard Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

It's always darkest before dawn. So if you're going to steal 
your neighbor's newspaper, that's the time to do it. - Will 
Rogers




On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Richard Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

In case you are worried about what is going to become of the 
younger generation, it is going to grow up and start worrying 
about the younger generation.




On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Richard Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.- 
Will Rogers



On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Richard J. Williams 
pundits...@gmail.com wrote:

On 1/7/2014 6:01 PM, Richard Williams wrote:

The journey of a thousand miles begins with a broken fan 
belt and a leaky tire. - Will Rogers
































Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Country Chuckles

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
So what was the good catch you said I made, Share? I don't believe you've 
responded to that question.
 

  Keep 'em coming Richard and thank you... 

 
 











[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
Uh-oh. You've made him really nervous, Ann.
 

   Just to reiterate: There is a God and you should be grateful for that 
Bawwy. Only Judy, Robin and I know how truly ridiculous, farcical you really 
are. You'll go to your grave taking yourself as seriously as you do not 
realizing those watching you go are clutching their sides and howling with 
laughter.
 

 That's quite a tight and elite group you've got there, Ann. The only ones who 
know the truth are you, Judy, and Robin. It almost sounds as if you're 
describing a cult.  :-) 
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: People are beginning to catch on

2014-02-10 Thread Bhairitu
Right now the boor meter is running pretty high on FFL with all this 
boring Robin talk.  Robin was a boor so no wonder. ;-)


On 02/10/2014 12:23 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:

 What is she going to do when *no one* falls for her tarbaby act any
 more, and allows themselves to get sucked into an argument with her
 just because she wants one?

 I predict panic.


*Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 02/08/14 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 02/15/14 00:00:00
304 messages as of (UTC) 02/09/14 23:44:16

67 authfriend*

*/Given an estimated 12-hour posting day, that's 2.8 posts per hour. 
Are we looking at another record posting week for the Judester?  :-)


Then again, look on the bright side. Maybe she'll follow her cult 
leader's lead and post a 13,000-word manifesto *demanding* that people 
argue with her...or else. And we all know what comes after that. 
Something to look forward to...


/*



*:-)*







[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authcunt wrote:

 Uh-oh. You've made him really nervous, Ann.


No, not at all. I'm just curious.

You two are the primary Robin defenders and supporters here. You go out
of your way to try to convert people to your way of seeing him, and
persecute them if they fail to agree with you and diss him. Now you've
clued us in that there aren't just two of you -- there are three. You
have private email conversations with Robin, conversations that allow
you to know the truth about things that others don't know.

Why was it that we shouldn't consider you a cult, again?  :-)


Just to reiterate: There is a God and you should be grateful for
that Bawwy. Only Judy, Robin and I know how truly ridiculous, farcical
you really are. You'll go to your grave taking yourself as seriously as
you do not realizing those watching you go are clutching their sides and
howling with laughter.


  That's quite a tight and elite group you've got there, Ann. The only
ones who know the truth are you, Judy, and Robin. It almost sounds as if
you're describing a cult.  :-) 




[FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
Sure Judy.  Just keep telling yourself that.  You'll be fine.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 I totally agree with you. It's an astute observation. 

 Unfortunately, it doesn't apply to Robin's and my irony duel. I'm afraid 
you're going to have to find another way to vent your hostility.
 

  Judy this may be hard for your to understand, but spending time trying to 
trick people, and then finding it to be the most fun you've had in the 
setting in which you trick the people, is not something really to be proud of. 

 But that may be indicative of your emotional make up, and the emotional make 
up of Robin.
 

 But to each his own. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Stevie, the only discomfort this is causing me is in my stomach muscles, 
which hurt from laughing so hard.
 

  It's not working Judy.  This reflects much more on you than me, or anyone 
else.  I am sorry that it is causing you so much discomfort.  On the other 
hand, maybe that is positive. Perhaps it may push you to try reconcile your 
self image and the image others see.
 

 If you weren't so obnoxious in your stupidity, we would probably have been 
more compassionate. But you really set yourself up to be laughed at rather than 
pitied.
 

 BTW, it's peals, not peels. You're welcome. 
 

 Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was relevant.
 

 (And remember, you got it completely, embarrassingly wrong about what was such 
fun for Robin and me. Yes, we did laugh privately at your stupidity in taking 
it seriously. We didn't expect anybody to be that brainless.)
 

  Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple 
days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be 
mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail 
from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many 
private e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because 
she sort of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know that Robin, Ann, and Judy are playing tricks 
on us pricks, will we never again believe anything they say on FFL. 
 
 I am surprised though, Judy, you would reveal this information about my prior 
association with you before I started posting at FFL. But I will take this as 
your need to express your hurt that I should turn on you like this. Still, I 
think it was imprudent of you to do this. But the damage is done, and we must 
live with it.
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960 
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/topics/300960



 


 



























Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: People are beginning to catch on

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
In fact, Robin was one of the more gentlemanly FFL posters. But Stevie and 
Barry are right up there at the top of the boor list. (Oh, and Richard, but 
nobody pays much attention to him except Share, who is herself no slouch in the 
boor department.)
 

  Right now the boor meter is running pretty high on FFL with all this boring 
Robin talk.  Robin was a boor so no wonder. ;-)  
 
 On 02/10/2014 12:23 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
 
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
TurquoiseB wrote:
 
  What is she going to do when *no one* falls for her tarbaby act any
  more, and allows themselves to get sucked into an argument with her 
  just because she wants one?
  
  I predict panic.
 
 
 Fairfield Life Post Counter
 ===
 Start Date (UTC): 02/08/14 00:00:00
 End Date (UTC): 02/15/14 00:00:00
 304 messages as of (UTC) 02/09/14 23:44:16
 
 67 authfriend
 
 Given an estimated 12-hour posting day, that's 2.8 posts per hour. Are we 
looking at another record posting week for the Judester?  :-)
 
 Then again, look on the bright side. Maybe she'll follow her cult leader's 
lead and post a 13,000-word manifesto *demanding* that people argue with 
her...or else. And we all know what comes after that. Something to look forward 
to...
 
 
 
 
 :-)

 
 

 




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Robin Carlsen Cult on Fairfield Life

2014-02-10 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 2/10/2014 6:36 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:
Really strange isn't Richard.  But compassion is what I feel right 
now, at least for Judy.  I think she had a lot riding on the whole 
affair.  More than some of us might have realized.


It's all over for Judy on this discussion group - now that she has been 
exposed as a serial liar and trickster. Robin wouldn't dare come back 
here anymore - he's finished as well. Good work, Steve!


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 2/10/2014 6:33 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:
But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of 
setting traps for people


Apparently the two of them, Judy and Robin, conspired to trick all the 
pricks with a false posting. Normal people reading Robin's post would 
think he was serious and finding out the truth, would probably call 
Robin's post a pack of lies, but Judy says it was a parody - a trick 
post in order to confuse us pricks. Now it turns out that Robin and Judy 
are the liars and the pricks and they have fun posting lies and prick 
teasers. Go Figure.


[FairfieldLife] for your heart, drink water before going to sleep

2014-02-10 Thread Share Long
 Water and your  heart
How many folks do you know who say they don't  want to drink anything before 
going to bed because they'll have to  get up during the  night!!
Why do people need to  urinate so much at night time. Answer from a 
Cardiologist:   Gravity holds water in the lower part of your body when you  
are upright (legs swell). When you lie down and the lower body (legs  and etc.) 
seeks level with the kidneys, it is then that the kidneys  remove the water 
because it is easier. This then ties in with the  last statement!
Correct time to drink water... Very Important.  From A Cardiac  Specialist!
Drinking water at a certain time maximizes its  effectiveness on the body: 2 
glasses of water after waking up -  helps activate internal organs, 1 glass of 
water 30 minutes before a  meal - helps digestion, 1 glass of water before 
taking a bath -  helps lower blood pressure, 1 glass of water before going to 
bed -  avoids stroke or heart  attack
Also: water at bed time will also help prevent  night time leg cramps. Your leg 
muscles are seeking hydration when  they cramp and wake you up with a Charlie  
Horse.
A Cardiologist has stated that if each person  after receiving this e-mail, 
sends it to 10 people, probably one  life could be saved!
I have already shared this information. What  about you?Do forward this 
message. It may save  lives!

[FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
You know, Stevie-boy, I kinda doubt anyone who reads the two posts I just put 
up from Robin's and my irony duel is likely to take your claim that we were 
trying to fool people terribly seriously. Even Barry is smarter than to go 
along with that (although he may now, but then he'll look just as dumb as you 
do).
 

 The reality of that exchange between Robin and me, what's on the record for 
everyone to see, simply doesn't support the fooling notion; it's way too over 
the top, nothing subtle about it. I think you've forgotten how it went. Take 
another look. If, say, Barry and Curtis had written those posts, do you think 
you'd still have been fooled?
 

 (You won't answer this, but that will tell us something about you, won't it?)
 

  Sure Judy.  Just keep telling yourself that.  You'll be fine. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 I totally agree with you. It's an astute observation. 

 Unfortunately, it doesn't apply to Robin's and my irony duel. I'm afraid 
you're going to have to find another way to vent your hostility.
 

  Judy this may be hard for your to understand, but spending time trying to 
trick people, and then finding it to be the most fun you've had in the 
setting in which you trick the people, is not something really to be proud of. 

 But that may be indicative of your emotional make up, and the emotional make 
up of Robin.
 

 But to each his own. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Stevie, the only discomfort this is causing me is in my stomach muscles, 
which hurt from laughing so hard.
 

  It's not working Judy.  This reflects much more on you than me, or anyone 
else.  I am sorry that it is causing you so much discomfort.  On the other 
hand, maybe that is positive. Perhaps it may push you to try reconcile your 
self image and the image others see.
 

 If you weren't so obnoxious in your stupidity, we would probably have been 
more compassionate. But you really set yourself up to be laughed at rather than 
pitied.
 

 BTW, it's peals, not peels. You're welcome. 
 

 Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was relevant.
 

 (And remember, you got it completely, embarrassingly wrong about what was such 
fun for Robin and me. Yes, we did laugh privately at your stupidity in taking 
it seriously. We didn't expect anybody to be that brainless.)
 

  Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple 
days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be 
mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail 
from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many 
private e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because 
she sort of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, you will hear Judy recite chapter and verse (for the 
umpteenth time) of what an honest person she is.  
 

 That's a go figure if ever there was one.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/9/2014 8:24 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:

 But you know, of course, that he completely repudiated what he'd written, 
right? 
 Most of Robin's writings appear to be parodies or total fibs. So far as I can 
tell, Robin never repudiated his parody of Judy. But, according to Judy and 
Ann, Robin told them in private email that it was a joke on the rest of us. If 
that's true, then nobody on FFL will ever believe anything Robin ever wrote or 
says again. And, now that we know 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread Richard J. Williams
On 2/10/2014 6:49 AM, Share Long wrote:
 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling 
 other people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a 
 bit arrogant. 
 
Judy is probably desperately emailing Robin at this second, trying to 
get him to either give her permission to publish his mail, or trying to 
get him to come back here and help her monitor the pricks that exposed 
them. Trickster, lying pricks, who deceive and pose as spiritual 
teachers and editors on internet forums. Watch out for them, Share - 
they can be really tricky.

 And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings 
 on the matter?
 
All we have from Robin is his own post and it looks like he was being 
serious, not posting a parody. Anyone want to place a bet that Robin is 
monitoring every message sent to this forum?



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 2/10/2014 6:38 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:
Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature. 


It appears that Judy is still using Yahoo Neo and Yahoo Mail from her 
home office. So, yes it must be very demeaning to get called on being a 
trickster, lying prick. She probably won't take this very well - but it 
looks like the truth. Robin is a trickster and he even tricked Judy into 
joining his cult following. Now that's impressive, you've got to admit!


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
So Stevie, we're all still waiting for you to tell us how to access Groups 
Classic and its search feature.
 

  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  
 
 



[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
Um, because three friends who email each other and share observations privately 
doesn't come anywhere near fitting the definition of a cult?
 

 I'll bet you've done that yourself, turkeyb. I seem to recall a little private 
colloquies you had going with Curtis and Vaj. Remember?
 

 Actually Ann and I speak up only when someone has said something inaccurate 
(deliberately or otherwise) or unfair about Robin. After all, he isn't here to 
defend himself, and there are newbies who never knew what he was like and have 
no way of knowing whether what people like you say is truthful. That seems to 
me to be a perfectly reasonable thing to do for a friend, and it's rather odd 
that you claim there's something sinister about it. Sounds paranoid and 
threatened, in fact, as if you felt entitled to say things that aren't true or 
fair about Robin and are outraged that anyone would challenge you.
 

 You don't read Ann's and my posts and didn't read Robin's when he was here 
anyway--remember?--so why it upsets you to think she and Robin and I may have 
said things to each other that you weren't able to read is beyond me.
 

  You two are the primary Robin defenders and supporters here. You go out of 
your way to try to convert people to your way of seeing him, and persecute them 
if they fail to agree with you and diss him. Now you've clued us in that there 
aren't just two of you -- there are three. You have private email 
conversations with Robin, conversations that allow you to know the truth about 
things that others don't know. 
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
This is the question I was responding to--I accidentally deleted it:
 

 Why was it that we shouldn't consider you a cult, again?  :-)
 

 Um, because three friends who email each other and share observations 
privately doesn't come anywhere near fitting the definition of a cult?
 

 I'll bet you've done that yourself, turkeyb. I seem to recall a little private 
colloquies you had going with Curtis and Vaj. Remember?
 

 Actually Ann and I speak up only when someone has said something inaccurate 
(deliberately or otherwise) or unfair about Robin. After all, he isn't here to 
defend himself, and there are newbies who never knew what he was like and have 
no way of knowing whether what people like you say is truthful. That seems to 
me to be a perfectly reasonable thing to do for a friend, and it's rather odd 
that you claim there's something sinister about it. Sounds paranoid and 
threatened, in fact, as if you felt entitled to say things that aren't true or 
fair about Robin and are outraged that anyone would challenge you.
 

 You don't read Ann's and my posts and didn't read Robin's when he was here 
anyway--remember?--so why it upsets you to think she and Robin and I may have 
said things to each other that you weren't able to read is beyond me.
 

  You two are the primary Robin defenders and supporters here. You go out of 
your way to try to convert people to your way of seeing him, and persecute them 
if they fail to agree with you and diss him. Now you've clued us in that there 
aren't just two of you -- there are three. You have private email 
conversations with Robin, conversations that allow you to know the truth about 
things that others don't know. 
 






[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Uh-oh. You've made him really nervous, Ann.
 

   Just to reiterate: There is a God and you should be grateful for that 
Bawwy. Only Judy, Robin and I know how truly ridiculous, farcical you really 
are. You'll go to your grave taking yourself as seriously as you do not 
realizing those watching you go are clutching their sides and howling with 
laughter.
 

 That's quite a tight and elite group you've got there, Ann. The only ones who 
know the truth are you, Judy, and Robin. It almost sounds as if you're 
describing a cult.  :-) 
 

 Yeah, either that or a musical jazz trio...
 







[FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
But in actuality Robin's whole pattern of writing was to alternate between his 
supposed irony and seriousness.  This example was just one example of it. And 
of course it is taken out of context of all that preceded it.  But taking 
things out of context and parsing is just your usual method of obscuring 
things, so no surprise there.
 

 And of course there is some evidence that Robin disparaged you to other 
parties in his private e-mails to them. So, throw that into the mix as well.  
Maybe he was just fooling you as well!
 

 So, sorry Judy, best go back to the drawing board.  No Olympic medal for you.  
So far you haven't even qualified.  (-:

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 You know, Stevie-boy, I kinda doubt anyone who reads the two posts I just put 
up from Robin's and my irony duel is likely to take your claim that we were 
trying to fool people terribly seriously. Even Barry is smarter than to go 
along with that (although he may now, but then he'll look just as dumb as you 
do).
 

 The reality of that exchange between Robin and me, what's on the record for 
everyone to see, simply doesn't support the fooling notion; it's way too over 
the top, nothing subtle about it. I think you've forgotten how it went. Take 
another look. If, say, Barry and Curtis had written those posts, do you think 
you'd still have been fooled?
 

 (You won't answer this, but that will tell us something about you, won't it?)
 

  Sure Judy.  Just keep telling yourself that.  You'll be fine. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 I totally agree with you. It's an astute observation. 

 Unfortunately, it doesn't apply to Robin's and my irony duel. I'm afraid 
you're going to have to find another way to vent your hostility.
 

  Judy this may be hard for your to understand, but spending time trying to 
trick people, and then finding it to be the most fun you've had in the 
setting in which you trick the people, is not something really to be proud of. 

 But that may be indicative of your emotional make up, and the emotional make 
up of Robin.
 

 But to each his own. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Stevie, the only discomfort this is causing me is in my stomach muscles, 
which hurt from laughing so hard.
 

  It's not working Judy.  This reflects much more on you than me, or anyone 
else.  I am sorry that it is causing you so much discomfort.  On the other 
hand, maybe that is positive. Perhaps it may push you to try reconcile your 
self image and the image others see.
 

 If you weren't so obnoxious in your stupidity, we would probably have been 
more compassionate. But you really set yourself up to be laughed at rather than 
pitied.
 

 BTW, it's peals, not peels. You're welcome. 
 

 Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was relevant.
 

 (And remember, you got it completely, embarrassingly wrong about what was such 
fun for Robin and me. Yes, we did laugh privately at your stupidity in taking 
it seriously. We didn't expect anybody to be that brainless.)
 

  Well, Judy has gloated many times about this in the past.  And a couple 
days ago, referring to one of her private e-mails from Robin, (not to be 
mistaken for an e-mail from or to, anyone else, this was a private e-mail 
from Robin to her, and not just a single isolated e-mail, but one of many 
private e-mails she got from Robin).  I just want to make that clear, because 
she sort of went on and on about it. 
 

 Anyway, where was I.  Oh yes, she said, in this most private of e-mails from 
Robin, that this was the most fun he had posting on FFL.
 

 There, finally got it out.
 

 I dooon't think she does realize what this says about her, and Robin. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:

 Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling other 
people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a bit arrogant. 
And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings on the 
matter?

 
 
 On Monday, February 10, 2014 6:33 AM, steve.sundur@... steve.sundur@... 
wrote:
 
   Really, the strange thing for me, is that both Judy and Robin consider this 
the best time they had posting on FFL, or at least near the top.  Judy said as 
much a few days ago.  Now what does that say about a person, or persons that 
creating a parody just to see how many people they can fool is what they 
consider great sport?
 

 But maybe the real kicker is that if you accuse Judy and Robin of setting 
traps for people, 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
Sure Judy, glad to oblige.  I have an e-mail that I use at work.  It is
  @sbcglobal.net.
 

 When I am logged in under that e-mail address FFL shows up under the old 
format, and I am able to read posts and use the search engine all as we used to 
do.
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 So Stevie, we're all still waiting for you to tell us how to access Groups 
Classic and its search feature.
 

  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  
 
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
try again.  it is __ @  s b c g l o b a l . n e t   (without 
the spaces)
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote:

 Sure Judy, glad to oblige.  I have an e-mail that I use at work.  It is
  @
 

 When I am logged in under that e-mail address FFL shows up under the old 
format, and I am able to read posts and use the search engine all as we used to 
do.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 So Stevie, we're all still waiting for you to tell us how to access Groups 
Classic and its search feature.
 

  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  
 
 







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread Bhairitu

On 02/10/2014 10:49 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

Uh-oh. You've made him really nervous, Ann.


  Just to reiterate: There is a God and you should be grateful for 
that Bawwy. *Only Judy, Robin and I know how truly ridiculous, 
farcical you really are.*You'll go to your grave taking yourself as 
seriously as you do not realizing those watching you go are clutching 
their sides and howling with laughter.

*/
/*
*/That's quite a tight and elite group you've got there, Ann. The only 
ones who know the truth are you, Judy, and Robin. It almost sounds as 
if you're describing a cult.  :-) /*

*/
/*
*Yeah, either that or a musical jazz trio...*


*Or a coven. :-D *



[FairfieldLife] Re: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authcunt wrote:
 
 Uh-oh. You've made him really nervous, Ann. 


 No, not at all. I'm just curious. 

You two are the primary Robin defenders and supporters here. You go out of your 
way to try to convert people to your way of seeing him, and persecute them if 
they fail to agree with you and diss him. Now you've clued us in that there 
aren't just two of you -- there are three. You have private email 
conversations with Robin, conversations that allow you to know the truth about 
things that others don't know. 
 

 Funnily enough I am not a Robin supporter, defender or non-defender. I have my 
own history and relationship with him that you are abysmally ignorant about yet 
you continue to make up wild speculation about based on nothing but your 
twisted imagination that finds a need to, well, make stuff up. Why you find 
this satisfying to dwell on whatever relationship I have or don't have with 
Robin only you are privy to. Or why you care at all is beyond me since you 
despise him and you revile me (no I don't think I'm important by saying so) 
this is curious (as you said). It is only because every time you make some 
postulation about what is actually going on or has gone on is so far off in 
left field I am quite enjoying this. After a while, and it's getting closer to 
that time, it is going to get pretty boring however.
 

 And what a silly statement,  You have private email conversations with 
Robin, conversations that allow you to know the truth about things that others 
don't know. Uh, yeah, that is what private email entails, Bawwy, that could be 
the very definition of private emails. I diss no one for disagreeing with 
Robin, never have, never will. I disagree with him all the time. I don't 
understand him hardly at all. But if you will recall this whole conversation 
started with Share's confusion about Robin's definition of enlightenment and 
whether he was deluded or enlightened. I merely tried to clarify his opinion on 
it. It is not my opinion since (how many times am I gonna have to say it)  I 
DON'T BELIEVE IN ANY STATE CALLED ENLIGHTENMENT.

Why was it that we shouldn't consider you a cult, again?  :-)
 

 You can consider anything you like, if it turns your crank. I figured out 
pretty early on at FFL, in my earliest conversations with you, that you are 
stuck in your own head and you know best. Carry on, there are so many types of 
delusions, aren't there?


Just to reiterate: There is a God and you should be grateful for that 
  Bawwy. Only Judy, Robin and I know how truly ridiculous, farcical you really 
  are. You'll go to your grave taking yourself as seriously as you do not 
  realizing those watching you go are clutching their sides and howling with 
  laughter. 
 
 
 That's quite a tight and elite group you've got there, Ann. The only ones who 
 know the truth are you, Judy, and Robin. It almost sounds as if you're 
 describing a cult. :-) 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread Bhairitu
I've got an sbcglobal.net email address too. I'm wondering if ATT told 
Yahoo to roll out Neo to us last as they have already have enough 
support problems. :-D


On 02/10/2014 10:53 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:


Sure Judy, glad to oblige.  I have an e-mail that I use at work.  It is

 @sbcglobal.net.


When I am logged in under that e-mail address FFL shows up under the 
old format, and I am able to read posts and use the search engine all 
as we used to do.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

So Stevie, we're all still waiting for you to tell us how to access 
Groups Classic and its search feature.



 Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out 
how access the previous classic format and search feature.  








Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Robin Carlsen Cult

2014-02-10 Thread awoelflebater


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:

 On 2/10/2014 6:49 AM, Share Long wrote:
  Steve, I had a very similar thought. What kind of person calls fooling 
  other people the most fun ever? Doesn't sound balanced to me. Sounds a 
  bit arrogant. 
 
 Judy is probably desperately emailing Robin at this second, trying to 
 get him to either give her permission to publish his mail, or trying to 
 get him to come back here and help her monitor the pricks that exposed 
 them. Trickster, lying pricks, who deceive and pose as spiritual 
 teachers and editors on internet forums. Watch out for them, Share - 
 they can be really tricky.
 
  And is Judy quoting Robin about this? Or are these just her feelings 
  on the matter?
 
 All we have from Robin is his own post and it looks like he was being 
 serious, not posting a parody. Anyone want to place a bet that Robin is 
 monitoring every message sent to this forum?
 

 I'll bet you $150,000, no, make it $200,000.



[FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
In actuality, he didn't alternate. There was no particular pattern. When he 
felt like using irony, he used irony. When he didn't, he didn't. The majority 
of his posts weren't ironic at all.
 

 There was no particular context for our irony duel, either. He just felt like 
having fun that day when he wrote the first of the posts. As I say, he didn't 
expect anybody to take it seriously. He knew I'd come back with something 
equally outrageous, which I did, and we took it from there.
 

 What you mean by parsing in this case, I can't imagine. I haven't parsed 
anything from those posts. Plus which, I'm not obscuring anything. Rather, 
I'm clearing away your attempts to obscure what we were really doing.
 

 As far as Curtis's evidence is concerned (it was just Curtis, nobody else), 
I know what that was all about (remember, Robin and I were in communication 
offline), and it was true after a fashion but deliberately misleading on 
Curtis's part. Curtis wasn't aware Robin and I were in private contact, so he 
thought he was safe in trying to stir up trouble between us. But he failed 
miserably and exposed himself as a class-A stinker into the bargain.
 

 I'm not looking to qualify for the Olympics, let alone for a medal, sorry to 
tell you. I'm just explaining what the real story was.
 

 I notice that you were unable to respond to my post that you quote. You just 
clobbered together a bunch of non sequiturs to try to confuse the issue further.
 

 But in actuality Robin's whole pattern of writing was to alternate between his 
supposed irony and seriousness.  This example was just one example of it. And 
of course it is taken out of context of all that preceded it.  But taking 
things out of context and parsing is just your usual method of obscuring 
things, so no surprise there.

 

 And of course there is some evidence that Robin disparaged you to other 
parties in his private e-mails to them. So, throw that into the mix as well.  
Maybe he was just fooling you as well!
 

 So, sorry Judy, best go back to the drawing board.  No Olympic medal for you.  
So far you haven't even qualified.  (-:

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 You know, Stevie-boy, I kinda doubt anyone who reads the two posts I just put 
up from Robin's and my irony duel is likely to take your claim that we were 
trying to fool people terribly seriously. Even Barry is smarter than to go 
along with that (although he may now, but then he'll look just as dumb as you 
do).
 

 The reality of that exchange between Robin and me, what's on the record for 
everyone to see, simply doesn't support the fooling notion; it's way too over 
the top, nothing subtle about it. I think you've forgotten how it went. Take 
another look. If, say, Barry and Curtis had written those posts, do you think 
you'd still have been fooled?
 

 (You won't answer this, but that will tell us something about you, won't it?)
 

  Sure Judy.  Just keep telling yourself that.  You'll be fine. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 I totally agree with you. It's an astute observation. 

 Unfortunately, it doesn't apply to Robin's and my irony duel. I'm afraid 
you're going to have to find another way to vent your hostility.
 

  Judy this may be hard for your to understand, but spending time trying to 
trick people, and then finding it to be the most fun you've had in the 
setting in which you trick the people, is not something really to be proud of. 

 But that may be indicative of your emotional make up, and the emotional make 
up of Robin.
 

 But to each his own. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Stevie, the only discomfort this is causing me is in my stomach muscles, 
which hurt from laughing so hard.
 

  It's not working Judy.  This reflects much more on you than me, or anyone 
else.  I am sorry that it is causing you so much discomfort.  On the other 
hand, maybe that is positive. Perhaps it may push you to try reconcile your 
self image and the image others see.
 

 If you weren't so obnoxious in your stupidity, we would probably have been 
more compassionate. But you really set yourself up to be laughed at rather than 
pitied.
 

 BTW, it's peals, not peels. You're welcome. 
 

 Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was relevant.
 

 (And remember, you got it completely, embarrassingly wrong about what was such 
fun for Robin and me. Yes, we did laugh privately at your stupidity in taking 
it seriously. We didn't expect anybody to be that brainless.)
 

  Well, Judy 

Re: [FairfieldLife] TV review: Ray Donovan

2014-02-10 Thread Bhairitu
I'm glad I went back to check out the remaining episodes of season one 
of The Following on Netflix.  I had bailed after episode three because 
it seemed to formulaic. Perhaps Bacon was thinking that too as the 
storylines improved over the remainder of the season.  But now I'm 
caught up on the first three episodes of season two they are pushing the 
envelope farther. It is now as if it is like an FX series minus the S 
word and minor nudity (FOX has been leading a charge to change FFC rules 
on these).  And Carries Preston (True Blood) as a guest star!


I also rented (actually bought on the cloud') the BBC 3 series In the 
Flesh.  Supposedly it played on BBC America but they sure weren't 
promoing it before I cut the cable.   There are only 3 episodes but this 
is a really different take on zombies.  It's about a town where people 
started suffering PDS or Partially Deceased Syndrome.  Like many UK 
dramas this is much smarter than if you turned Hollywood loose on the 
idea.  There is supposed to be a second season.


On 02/09/2014 09:21 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


*/I want to write this to thank those on this forum who recommended 
this series. I've just binge-watched my way through the first season, 
and I see what you were raving about.


It's a drama about a dysfunctional family. But then, so were Macbeth 
and Hamlet.


And no, of course the language of this series is not Shakespearean, 
and the closest it gets to iambic pentameter is the Irish Southie 
accent spoken by many of its characters, but the drama is often right 
up there with Shakespeare's, as is its sense of what constitutes a 
human tragedy.


This is a Big Budget Production. Not so much in terms of sets or CGI, 
but in terms of what kinds of talent the creators were willing to 
hire, to play both the primary parts and the shorter guest slots. 
The former consist of Liev Shrieber (Best Actor Golden Globe nominee 
for this show) and Jon Voight (former Oscar winner and Best Actor 
Golden Globe winner for this show). They are ably assisted in the 
regular cast roles by Paula Malcomson, Steven Bauer, Eddie Marshan, 
Dash Mihok, Peter Jacobson, and Elliot Gould. Shorter appearances have 
been made (and never wasted) by James Woods, Rosanna Arquette, Denise 
Crosby, and many others.


And not a penny of this investment in talent is wasted. They are given 
great lines to speak, great characters to fill with life, and an 
opportunity to create great TV. To a man or woman, they seem to have 
taken this opportunity and run with it.


The action takes place in the uber-brightness of L.A. But it's often 
dark, ranging from Catholic priest child abuse to murder. Ray Donovan 
(Schreiver) is a fixer, catering to very rich and famous Hollywood 
people to make their problems go away. If you wake up with a dead 
hooker in the bed with you, Ray is the guy to call. He can handle 
*anything*. Except his own family, especially when his father (Voight) 
shows up.


It's a damned good series, and I look forward to the next season of 
it. Rated not for Buck, and maybe not for some of the aging flower 
children here.


/*






Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
And how is that supposed to help those of us who don't have an s b c g l o b a 
l . n e t email address?
 
  try again.  it is __ @  s b c g l o b a l . n e t   
(without the spaces) 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote:

 Sure Judy, glad to oblige.  I have an e-mail that I use at work.  It is
  @
 

 When I am logged in under that e-mail address FFL shows up under the old 
format, and I am able to read posts and use the search engine all as we used to 
do.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 So Stevie, we're all still waiting for you to tell us how to access Groups 
Classic and its search feature.
 

  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  
 
 









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
I am not familiar enough with providers to know if you are able or not able to 
access that global.net address.  But evidently Ann uses it, so perhaps it is 
more accessible than you think.  Don't know.
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 And how is that supposed to help those of us who don't have an s b c g l o b a 
l . n e t email address?
 
  try again.  it is __ @  s b c g l o b a l . n e t   
(without the spaces) 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote:

 Sure Judy, glad to oblige.  I have an e-mail that I use at work.  It is
  @
 

 When I am logged in under that e-mail address FFL shows up under the old 
format, and I am able to read posts and use the search engine all as we used to 
do.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 So Stevie, we're all still waiting for you to tell us how to access Groups 
Classic and its search feature.
 

  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  
 
 











Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
I've been reading the group ModsandMembers, which is a bunch of folks trying to 
get Yahoo to ditch Neo and bring back Classic. They are most likely going to 
fail at that. I remember--but can't locate any of the posts via Neo's 
search--some talk about ATT and how the company insisted on staying with 
Classic. Can't recall any of the details, though.
 

 Bhairitu, if you can access Classic search, do you want to try to locate the 
posts on ModsandMembers?
 

 I've got an sbcglobal.net email address too. I'm wondering if ATT told Yahoo 
to roll out Neo to us last as they have already have enough support problems.  
:-D 
 
 On 02/10/2014 10:53 AM, steve.sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote:
 
   Sure Judy, glad to oblige.  I have an e-mail that I use at work.  It is
  @
 
 
 When I am logged in under that e-mail address FFL shows up under the old 
format, and I am able to read posts and use the search engine all as we used to 
do.
 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
 So Stevie, we're all still waiting for you to tell us how to access Groups 
Classic and its search feature.
 
 
  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  
 
 




 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 I am not familiar enough with providers to know if you are able or not
able to access that global.net address.  But evidently Ann uses it, so
perhaps it is more accessible than you think.  Don't know.

I did a test today, logging in from multiple computers served by
multiple Internet services, and the results were consistent. Using one
sequence, if I logged in from either Chrome or Firefox to FFL, I got
Neo. Using another sequence, I got the old classic interface, including
the old Search utilities.

I'm not going to tell Judy what the sequence was because I like to see
her sputter and fume because she can't stalk people using the Yahoo
Search engine.  :-)





[FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
I thought I responded to whatever quote you posted.  Maybe you didn't like my 
reply.  But going by past history with you, I don't think its worth going back 
to try to sort it out.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 In actuality, he didn't alternate. There was no particular pattern. When he 
felt like using irony, he used irony. When he didn't, he didn't. The majority 
of his posts weren't ironic at all.
 

 There was no particular context for our irony duel, either. He just felt like 
having fun that day when he wrote the first of the posts. As I say, he didn't 
expect anybody to take it seriously. He knew I'd come back with something 
equally outrageous, which I did, and we took it from there.
 

 What you mean by parsing in this case, I can't imagine. I haven't parsed 
anything from those posts. Plus which, I'm not obscuring anything. Rather, 
I'm clearing away your attempts to obscure what we were really doing.
 

 As far as Curtis's evidence is concerned (it was just Curtis, nobody else), 
I know what that was all about (remember, Robin and I were in communication 
offline), and it was true after a fashion but deliberately misleading on 
Curtis's part. Curtis wasn't aware Robin and I were in private contact, so he 
thought he was safe in trying to stir up trouble between us. But he failed 
miserably and exposed himself as a class-A stinker into the bargain.
 

 I'm not looking to qualify for the Olympics, let alone for a medal, sorry to 
tell you. I'm just explaining what the real story was.
 

 I notice that you were unable to respond to my post that you quote. You just 
clobbered together a bunch of non sequiturs to try to confuse the issue further.
 

 But in actuality Robin's whole pattern of writing was to alternate between his 
supposed irony and seriousness.  This example was just one example of it. And 
of course it is taken out of context of all that preceded it.  But taking 
things out of context and parsing is just your usual method of obscuring 
things, so no surprise there.

 

 And of course there is some evidence that Robin disparaged you to other 
parties in his private e-mails to them. So, throw that into the mix as well.  
Maybe he was just fooling you as well!
 

 So, sorry Judy, best go back to the drawing board.  No Olympic medal for you.  
So far you haven't even qualified.  (-:

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 You know, Stevie-boy, I kinda doubt anyone who reads the two posts I just put 
up from Robin's and my irony duel is likely to take your claim that we were 
trying to fool people terribly seriously. Even Barry is smarter than to go 
along with that (although he may now, but then he'll look just as dumb as you 
do).
 

 The reality of that exchange between Robin and me, what's on the record for 
everyone to see, simply doesn't support the fooling notion; it's way too over 
the top, nothing subtle about it. I think you've forgotten how it went. Take 
another look. If, say, Barry and Curtis had written those posts, do you think 
you'd still have been fooled?
 

 (You won't answer this, but that will tell us something about you, won't it?)
 

  Sure Judy.  Just keep telling yourself that.  You'll be fine. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 I totally agree with you. It's an astute observation. 

 Unfortunately, it doesn't apply to Robin's and my irony duel. I'm afraid 
you're going to have to find another way to vent your hostility.
 

  Judy this may be hard for your to understand, but spending time trying to 
trick people, and then finding it to be the most fun you've had in the 
setting in which you trick the people, is not something really to be proud of. 

 But that may be indicative of your emotional make up, and the emotional make 
up of Robin.
 

 But to each his own. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Stevie, the only discomfort this is causing me is in my stomach muscles, 
which hurt from laughing so hard.
 

  It's not working Judy.  This reflects much more on you than me, or anyone 
else.  I am sorry that it is causing you so much discomfort.  On the other 
hand, maybe that is positive. Perhaps it may push you to try reconcile your 
self image and the image others see.
 

 If you weren't so obnoxious in your stupidity, we would probably have been 
more compassionate. But you really set yourself up to be laughed at rather than 
pitied.
 

 BTW, it's peals, not peels. You're welcome. 
 

 Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Um, no, she didn't go on and on about having an email correspondence with 
Robin. She mentioned it a couple times when it was 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
You have to have a consumer account with ATT (e.g., phone) to get an email 
address. My cell and landline are both with Verizon, so no dice.
 

 Just to remind you of your gratuitously nasty (and mistaken) post:
 

  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  

 

 As I said, it's not a matter of figuring out how to access Classic. It's 
simply not an option.
 

 I am not familiar enough with providers to know if you are able or not able to 
access that global.net address. But evidently Ann uses it, so perhaps it is 
more accessible than you think.  Don't know.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 And how is that supposed to help those of us who don't have an s b c g l o b a 
l . n e t email address?
 
  try again.  it is __ @  s b c g l o b a l . n e t   
(without the spaces) 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote:

 Sure Judy, glad to oblige.  I have an e-mail that I use at work.  It is
  @
 

 When I am logged in under that e-mail address FFL shows up under the old 
format, and I am able to read posts and use the search engine all as we used to 
do.
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 So Stevie, we're all still waiting for you to tell us how to access Groups 
Classic and its search feature.
 

  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  
 
 













[FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
No, you didn't respond to it. The quote with the question is below; just scroll 
down. It's a pretty simple question, but you don't dare answer it.
 

  I thought I responded to whatever quote you posted.  Maybe you didn't like 
my reply.  But going by past history with you, I don't think its worth going 
back to try to sort it out.  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 In actuality, he didn't alternate. There was no particular pattern. When he 
felt like using irony, he used irony. When he didn't, he didn't. The majority 
of his posts weren't ironic at all.
 

 There was no particular context for our irony duel, either. He just felt like 
having fun that day when he wrote the first of the posts. As I say, he didn't 
expect anybody to take it seriously. He knew I'd come back with something 
equally outrageous, which I did, and we took it from there.
 

 What you mean by parsing in this case, I can't imagine. I haven't parsed 
anything from those posts. Plus which, I'm not obscuring anything. Rather, 
I'm clearing away your attempts to obscure what we were really doing.
 

 As far as Curtis's evidence is concerned (it was just Curtis, nobody else), 
I know what that was all about (remember, Robin and I were in communication 
offline), and it was true after a fashion but deliberately misleading on 
Curtis's part. Curtis wasn't aware Robin and I were in private contact, so he 
thought he was safe in trying to stir up trouble between us. But he failed 
miserably and exposed himself as a class-A stinker into the bargain.
 

 I'm not looking to qualify for the Olympics, let alone for a medal, sorry to 
tell you. I'm just explaining what the real story was.
 

 I notice that you were unable to respond to my post that you quote. You just 
clobbered together a bunch of non sequiturs to try to confuse the issue further.
 

 But in actuality Robin's whole pattern of writing was to alternate between his 
supposed irony and seriousness.  This example was just one example of it. And 
of course it is taken out of context of all that preceded it.  But taking 
things out of context and parsing is just your usual method of obscuring 
things, so no surprise there.

 

 And of course there is some evidence that Robin disparaged you to other 
parties in his private e-mails to them. So, throw that into the mix as well.  
Maybe he was just fooling you as well!
 

 So, sorry Judy, best go back to the drawing board.  No Olympic medal for you.  
So far you haven't even qualified.  (-:

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 You know, Stevie-boy, I kinda doubt anyone who reads the two posts I just put 
up from Robin's and my irony duel is likely to take your claim that we were 
trying to fool people terribly seriously. Even Barry is smarter than to go 
along with that (although he may now, but then he'll look just as dumb as you 
do).
 

 The reality of that exchange between Robin and me, what's on the record for 
everyone to see, simply doesn't support the fooling notion; it's way too over 
the top, nothing subtle about it. I think you've forgotten how it went. Take 
another look. If, say, Barry and Curtis had written those posts, do you think 
you'd still have been fooled?
 

 (You won't answer this, but that will tell us something about you, won't it?)
 

  Sure Judy.  Just keep telling yourself that.  You'll be fine. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 I totally agree with you. It's an astute observation. 

 Unfortunately, it doesn't apply to Robin's and my irony duel. I'm afraid 
you're going to have to find another way to vent your hostility.
 

  Judy this may be hard for your to understand, but spending time trying to 
trick people, and then finding it to be the most fun you've had in the 
setting in which you trick the people, is not something really to be proud of. 

 But that may be indicative of your emotional make up, and the emotional make 
up of Robin.
 

 But to each his own. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Stevie, the only discomfort this is causing me is in my stomach muscles, 
which hurt from laughing so hard.
 

  It's not working Judy.  This reflects much more on you than me, or anyone 
else.  I am sorry that it is causing you so much discomfort.  On the other 
hand, maybe that is positive. Perhaps it may push you to try reconcile your 
self image and the image others see.
 

 If you weren't so obnoxious in your stupidity, we would probably have been 
more compassionate. But you really set yourself up to be laughed at rather than 
pitied.
 

 BTW, it's peals, not peels. You're welcome. 
 

 Judy, 
 

 No, it certainly would not surprise me that you and Robin had peels of 
laughter at my expense or at someone who would fall for one of your tricks.  
Does not surprise me in the least.  Kind of indicates a dearth of other, more 
healthy outlets, if you ask me.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Taliban Readies 500 Female Suicide Bombers

2014-02-10 Thread jr_esq
MJ,
 

 I think you've nailed the cycle of death and futility that the Taliban is 
using for its draconian objectives.  They're recruiting those women who have 
lost husbands and family members due to the war and have convinced them to 
avenge their deaths by becoming suicide bombers.
 

 There is no other way to describe it.  The evil forces are at work here.


[FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
Translation: Barry knows there's no way I can access Classic.
 

  I am not familiar enough with providers to know if you are able or not able 
  to access that global.net address. But evidently Ann uses it, so perhaps it 
  is more accessible than you think. Don't know.
 

 I did a test today, logging in from multiple computers served by multiple 
Internet services, and the results were consistent. Using one sequence, if I 
logged in from either Chrome or Firefox to FFL, I got Neo. Using another 
sequence, I got the old classic interface, including the old Search utilities. 
 
I'm not going to tell Judy what the sequence was because I like to see her 
sputter and fume because she can't stalk people using the Yahoo Search engine.  
:-)






[FairfieldLife] RE: Taliban Readies 500 Female Suicide Bombers

2014-02-10 Thread jr_esq
Share,
 

 As I've replied to MJ, the Taliban is using hate and revenge as the motivation 
for these women to become suicide bombers.  If these women have lost their 
husbands and family members, they know that, by the way the Islamic culture is 
set up, they have nothing else left.  So, it is very easy for them to become 
willing participants in their self-destruction to destroy the infidels.
 

 You can see the nature of their leaders by the works that they do.  Death, 
hatred, revenge, and futility are their calling cards.  Can you guess where 
they're from?
 

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread Bhairitu
The back story on SBC Global where I am was Southern Bell took over 
various regional telecoms including PacBell in my area.  Then they 
changed their name to ATT through acquisition.   But the old sbcglobal 
email address are still used.  ATT had Yahoo handle email.  I also have 
two Yahoo email address and accounts too from before ATT did that.


The classic interface was sticking around after I would log out on a 
browser but yesterday that didn't happen and it reverted to Neo at least 
on Linux.


On 02/10/2014 11:46 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:

 I am not familiar enough with providers to know if you are able or 
not able to access that global.net address. But evidently Ann uses it, 
so perhaps it is more accessible than you think. Don't know.


*/I did a test today, logging in from multiple computers served by 
multiple Internet services, and the results were consistent. Using one 
sequence, if I logged in from either Chrome or Firefox to FFL, I got 
Neo. Using another sequence, I got the old classic interface, 
including the old Search utilities.


I'm not going to tell Judy what the sequence was because I like to see 
her sputter and fume because she can't stalk people using the Yahoo 
Search engine.  :-)

/*






Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread Bhairitu
It's an open group like FFL.  You can use Google to search for 
messages.  Did you try that?


On 02/10/2014 11:43 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:


*I've been reading the group ModsandMembers, which is a bunch of folks 
trying to get Yahoo to ditch Neo and bring back Classic. They are most 
likely going to fail at that. I remember--but can't locate any of the 
posts via Neo's search--some talk about ATT and how the company 
insisted on staying with Classic. Can't recall any of the details, 
though.*


*
*

*Bhairitu, if you can access Classic search, do you want to try to 
locate the posts on ModsandMembers?*



I've got an sbcglobal.net email address too. I'm wondering if ATT 
told Yahoo to roll out Neo to us last as they have already have enough 
support problems. :-D



On 02/10/2014 10:53 AM, steve.sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@...
wrote:


Sure Judy, glad to oblige.  I have an e-mail that I use at work.  It is

 @


When I am logged in under that e-mail address FFL shows up under the 
old format, and I am able to read posts and use the search engine all 
as we used to do.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... 
mailto:authfriend@... wrote:


So Stevie, we're all still waiting for you to tell us how to access 
Groups Classic and its search feature.



 Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out 
how access the previous classic format and search feature.  










[FairfieldLife] RE: Taliban Readies 500 Female Suicide Bombers

2014-02-10 Thread jr_esq
Mike Dixon,
 

 Here's the reply that was meant for you.
 

 I think you've nailed the cycle of death and futility that the Taliban is 
using for its draconian objectives.  They're recruiting those women who have 
lost husbands and family members due to the war and have convinced them to 
avenge their deaths by becoming suicide bombers.
 

 There is no other way to describe it.  The evil forces are at work here.


Re: [FairfieldLife] Taliban Readies 500 Female Suicide Bombers

2014-02-10 Thread Michael Jackson
I think you're replying to Mike Dixon and not MJ (that's me)

On Mon, 2/10/14, jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Taliban Readies 500 Female Suicide Bombers
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Monday, February 10, 2014, 8:05 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
   
   
   MJ,
 I
 think you've nailed the cycle of death and futility that
 the Taliban is using for its draconian objectives.
  They're recruiting those women who have lost
 husbands and family members due to the war and have
 convinced them to avenge their deaths by becoming suicide
 bombers.
 There
 is no other way to describe it.  The evil forces are at
 work here.
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Taliban Readies 500 Female Suicide Bombers

2014-02-10 Thread jr_esq
MJ,
 

 You're correct.  I've resent the post to Mike Dixon.  Thanks for catching the 
error.


Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Maharishi's Marketing

2014-02-10 Thread dhamiltony2k5
MJ, your thinking is currently wrong around this TM organization stuff. It is 
just not accurate. Maharishi turned over the elements of it all at the time of 
his death. It was quite well planned for as a transition. The current revival 
of the teaching of TM was underway even before Maharishi passed away. In a 
process it is doing fine and seems on a typical curve like it has gone for a 
lot of spiritual groups in their post-charismatic phase. Maharishi gave his 
trustees the authority and power to administer the TM movement and particularly 
Maharishi anointed and gave the teaching of TM to John Hagelin in America and 
other smart people to do as they see best fit. The movement moves on. They are 
on the move and being quite successful now teaching TM. As like once was done 
at an earlier time prior to the current Prime Minister's era the decisions in 
the presentation of the transcending meditation state are being made on basis 
of science and merit and not so much around judgments of fealty as before under 
Maharishi and the Prime Minister. For instance, if polling shows that it is no 
longer effective having Maharishi out front and that is not in the interest of 
promulgating the meditation to its best then so be it. Likewise some other very 
practical changes being made to the policies of how the meditation is 
presented. Guidelines are different than what is the purity of the teaching. 
The essential spiritual teaching of the technique is in the hands of science 
and teachers now. They are moving forward with what they have. Some angry man 
from South Carolina or other quitters are not going to stop what is a larger 
destiny of transcending meditation rolling forward.
 I hope you can heal around this. 
 
 
 And TM, its Truth keeps marching on.
 Glory, Glory Hallelujah!
 Glory, Glory Hallelujah!
 Glory, Glory Hallelujah!
 Its Truth keeps marching on, 
 -U.S. Buck in the Dome 
 
 
 
 

 

 You guys minds are so crude. I am simply suggesting MJ “rectify” his wrong 
thinking that seems based on some evident poor experiences in his long 
profligate lost time past. Often times having one's meditation checked for 
effectiveness of spiritual experience can clear things up. A meditation 
checking can provide that insight of right experience and one's joining in the 
field effect of a group meditation with strong spiritually experienced 
meditators will too. Let's close the eyes, let's open the eyes, . .
 

 I am sincerely concerned about your all having strayed so far in the anger of 
your thinking and feelings around what is the transcending meditative 
experience. I know from my own experience that you are losing a most precious 
opportunity of spiritual life on earth as what is the full intelligence of 
spirituality in the human physiology and a human life on earth. LIFE in the 
body, as the intelligence of the Unified Field in the Body. Waste not, wont 
not. Make Haste!
 I extend my hand to help you as I can if you will take it,
 -U.S. Buck in the Dome
 

 

 Om No, the teaching of transcending meditation is called initiative. The new 
TM.org has initiative. What a crock of stinking dog manure you make as 
prediction here. You obviously need a rectification. The meditative state of 
transcending meditation is not going to go away anytime soon for a long time 
never. Transcending meditation is a long way from over as the meditative state. 
The Unified Field is forever. You are fighting science. Repent your ways, come 
back to meditation and join with a group meditation nearby you.
 Unconditional Surrender,
 -Buck in the Dome
 

 mjackson74 writes:

 What you are seeing with the Movement is a very carefully orchestrated tactic 
to sanitize TM as much as possible to re-sell it to the ignorant masses. The 
idea of disassociating TM from Maharishi should be taken as an insult to him, 
if you really think he and what he did were the best thing since sliced bread, 
but I know you don't because you, like all TB'ers, will swallow anything the 
Movement tells you to swallow (except stuff in your case, that keeps people out 
of the Domes)
 
 This offering TM and no longer mentioning Marshy or minimizing his presence 
and role to the public is the same as not having any mention or presence of the 
rajas at MUM during Visitor's Weekend there. They are hiding what has been and 
what is. 
 
 Too bad for them, because you can't escape your karmic baggage forever - the 
excesses and unconscionable behavior of Marshy, Bevan, Hagelin and the Movement 
at large will be made public eventually and the general public will turn them 
out to pasture. When this happens, MUM will lose its accreditation, Girish and 
the Srivastavas boys will then sell the entire campus to developers who want to 
build some houses that make sense, the vastu buildings are all torn down, the 
Domes are used as grain storage silos until the grain dealers realize the Domes 
have mold problems and they are then torn down completely. Some former students 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Raam

2014-02-10 Thread authfriend
Tried it just now, no luck. So you're not going to bother searching the group 
with Classic? Doesn't matter to me personally, I'm just curious.
 

  It's an open group like FFL.  You can use Google to search for messages.  
Did you try that? 

 
 On 02/10/2014 11:43 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
   I've been reading the group ModsandMembers, which is a bunch of folks trying 
to get Yahoo to ditch Neo and bring back Classic. They are most likely going to 
fail at that. I remember--but can't locate any of the posts via Neo's 
search--some talk about ATT and how the company insisted on staying with 
Classic. Can't recall any of the details, though.
 
 
 Bhairitu, if you can access Classic search, do you want to try to locate the 
posts on ModsandMembers?
 
 
 I've got an sbcglobal.net email address too. I'm wondering if ATT told Yahoo 
to roll out Neo to us last as they have already have enough support problems.  
:-D 
 
 On 02/10/2014 10:53 AM, steve.sundur@... mailto:steve.sundur@... wrote:
 
   Sure Judy, glad to oblige.  I have an e-mail that I use at work.  It is
  @
 
 
 When I am logged in under that e-mail address FFL shows up under the old 
format, and I am able to read posts and use the search engine all as we used to 
do.
 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
 
 So Stevie, we're all still waiting for you to tell us how to access Groups 
Classic and its search feature.
 
 
  Richard, Judy, who loves to demean people can't see to figure out how 
access the previous classic format and search feature.  
 
 




 



 




[FairfieldLife] RE: The Essence of the Anti-Robin Carlsen Jihad

2014-02-10 Thread steve.sundur
You mean the same question you put to most everyone you disagree with as to 
whether they would challenge Barry or Curtis if they wrote a post you found 
offensive?  You mean your usual loaded question?
 

 If something strikes me as inconsistent, I will make a challenge, as I did to 
Barry a few days ago, and as I have done with Curtis.
 

 The difference with them is that they can converse in a way that is conducive 
to a better understanding.  
 

 You bring to the table a different agenda altogether that I dare say most 
people find disagreeable.  Now of course you would say it is your unflinching 
adherence to truth.  I'd love to put that statement to an independent panel.
 

 Does that address your question or the quote you are referring to?
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 No, you didn't respond to it. The quote with the question is below; just 
scroll down. It's a pretty simple question, but you don't dare answer it.
 

  I thought I responded to whatever quote you posted.  Maybe you didn't like 
my reply.  But going by past history with you, I don't think its worth going 
back to try to sort it out.  
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 In actuality, he didn't alternate. There was no particular pattern. When he 
felt like using irony, he used irony. When he didn't, he didn't. The majority 
of his posts weren't ironic at all.
 

 There was no particular context for our irony duel, either. He just felt like 
having fun that day when he wrote the first of the posts. As I say, he didn't 
expect anybody to take it seriously. He knew I'd come back with something 
equally outrageous, which I did, and we took it from there.
 

 What you mean by parsing in this case, I can't imagine. I haven't parsed 
anything from those posts. Plus which, I'm not obscuring anything. Rather, 
I'm clearing away your attempts to obscure what we were really doing.
 

 As far as Curtis's evidence is concerned (it was just Curtis, nobody else), 
I know what that was all about (remember, Robin and I were in communication 
offline), and it was true after a fashion but deliberately misleading on 
Curtis's part. Curtis wasn't aware Robin and I were in private contact, so he 
thought he was safe in trying to stir up trouble between us. But he failed 
miserably and exposed himself as a class-A stinker into the bargain.
 

 I'm not looking to qualify for the Olympics, let alone for a medal, sorry to 
tell you. I'm just explaining what the real story was.
 

 I notice that you were unable to respond to my post that you quote. You just 
clobbered together a bunch of non sequiturs to try to confuse the issue further.
 

 But in actuality Robin's whole pattern of writing was to alternate between his 
supposed irony and seriousness.  This example was just one example of it. And 
of course it is taken out of context of all that preceded it.  But taking 
things out of context and parsing is just your usual method of obscuring 
things, so no surprise there.

 

 And of course there is some evidence that Robin disparaged you to other 
parties in his private e-mails to them. So, throw that into the mix as well.  
Maybe he was just fooling you as well!
 

 So, sorry Judy, best go back to the drawing board.  No Olympic medal for you.  
So far you haven't even qualified.  (-:

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 You know, Stevie-boy, I kinda doubt anyone who reads the two posts I just put 
up from Robin's and my irony duel is likely to take your claim that we were 
trying to fool people terribly seriously. Even Barry is smarter than to go 
along with that (although he may now, but then he'll look just as dumb as you 
do).
 

 The reality of that exchange between Robin and me, what's on the record for 
everyone to see, simply doesn't support the fooling notion; it's way too over 
the top, nothing subtle about it. I think you've forgotten how it went. Take 
another look. If, say, Barry and Curtis had written those posts, do you think 
you'd still have been fooled?
 

 (You won't answer this, but that will tell us something about you, won't it?)
 

  Sure Judy.  Just keep telling yourself that.  You'll be fine. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 I totally agree with you. It's an astute observation. 

 Unfortunately, it doesn't apply to Robin's and my irony duel. I'm afraid 
you're going to have to find another way to vent your hostility.
 

  Judy this may be hard for your to understand, but spending time trying to 
trick people, and then finding it to be the most fun you've had in the 
setting in which you trick the people, is not something really to be proud of. 

 But that may be indicative of your emotional make up, and the emotional make 
up of Robin.
 

 But to each his own. 
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Stevie, the only discomfort this is causing me is in my stomach muscles, 
which hurt from 

  1   2   >