[FairfieldLife] Re: The greatest political pop song

[feste37]

It's hard to believe that "Part of the Union" is not meant satirically. I've 
never considered it anything other than a satire. In the early to mid-1970s 
there was a lot of public feeling against the perceived selfishness and power 
of the trade unions, who were, it seemed, always going on strike and 
inconveniencing the public. This song is a swipe at union arrogance.  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Re "Part of the Union": 

 Another great song. 

 But I could virtually repeat what I just now posted about The Who's "Won't Get 
Fooled Again" in reference to The Strawbs' hit. 

 When I heard it at the time it came out I took it as a straight piece of 
pro-union power, lefty agitprop.
 

 Since then some have suggested it was in reality a satirical attack on the 
unions.
 

 From Wiki:
 

 The song is widely considered to be a proud folk anthem for the working man, 
and was unofficially adopted by the trade union movement. Some see the lyrics 
as satirically anti-trade union, though reportedly “the band has frequently 
stated that that’s not the case at all” while Cousins did not deny the satire 
in an 2010 interview.

 

 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Here's your right-leaning political pop song. (Bear in mind the historical 
context.)

Strawbs - Part of the union 1973 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdOCWUgwiWs 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdOCWUgwiWs
 
 Strawbs - Part of the union 1973 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdOCWUgwiWs 
Strawbs - Part of the union 1973 Now I'm a union man Amazed at what I am I say 
what I think That the company stinks Yes I'm a union man. When we meet in the...


 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdOCWUgwiWs 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 What would be your choice? Maybe . . .
 

 This Land Is Your Land - Woody Guthrie (1940)

 

 Where Have All the Flowers Gone - Pete Seeger (1961)

 

 The Times They Are a-Changin’ - Bob Dylan (1964)

 

 God Save the Queen - The Sex Pistols (1977)

 

 (All political pop seems to be left-leaning. Can't think of a right-wing pop 
song off the top of my head.)
 

 But I'd rate John Lennon's output as the best. Definitely the catchiest! 
 Maybe the song Imagine (1971) . . . or Revolution (1968) . . . or Give Peace a 
Chance (1969).
 

 But this Lennon track is so disillusioned and "plague on both your houses" 
that it best encapsulates my attitude to the dismal world of politics . . .
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxyMIov9nggindex=1list=FLJad8vN225Nr5hDIzlEOYMA
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxyMIov9nggindex=1list=FLJad8vN225Nr5hDIzlEOYMA

 

 

 

 

 

 

[FairfieldLife] If you Come, You Will Be Beaten

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

It appears some over zealous German citizens are already making the first move. 
 
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/europes-border-crisis/far-right-extremists-blamed-after-syrians-beaten-germany-n45564
 
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/europes-border-crisis/far-right-extremists-blamed-after-syrians-beaten-germany-n45564

[FairfieldLife] If You Can Take 13 Minutes

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

This little documentary puts faces to statistics and makes it easier to view 
the Syrian migration in a kinder light:
 http://www.nbcnews.com/video/one-refugees-journey-to-a-new-future-532168771566 
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/one-refugees-journey-to-a-new-future-532168771566

[FairfieldLife] Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

   
   
Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton 
  Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 
30k emails Hillary deleted from her private  email server very likely had 
references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of 
interest.
 
 The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing 
it.
 
 Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax 
free international money laundering scheme.  It may eventually prove to be the 
largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
 
 This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and 
repackage it to be used for your own purposes.  All tax free.  Here's how it 
works:
 
 1. You create  a separate foreign "charity."  In this case one in Canada.
 
 2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.   
In this case, over 1,000 did  -- contributing mega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this out of  the  goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. 
(Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and  just deciding to send 
untold  millions to a  Canadian charity).
 
 3. The Canadian charity then  bundles these separate donations and makes a 
massive donation to the    Clinton Foundation.
 
 4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating  Canadian charity claim Canadian 
law prohibits the identification of  individual donors.
 
 5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of  this  money for legitimate 
good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 
10%.  Much of the balance goes to enrich the  Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untold numbers of  hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc.  Again, virtually 
all tax free,    which means you and I are subsidizing it.
 
 6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, 
somehow  fails to report much  of this on their tax filings.  They discover 
these "clerical  errors"  and begin the process  of re-filing 5 years of tax 
returns.
 
 7. Net result -- foreign money,  much of it from other countries, goes into 
the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable  back to the original donor.  
This is the textbook definition  of money  laundering.
 
 Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank 
Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy who was central to the formation of 
Uranium One,  the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium 
interests and then sold them to an organization  controlled by Russia. This 
transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was 
Secretary of State when the approval was granted.  As an aside, imagine how 
former Virginia Governor Bob  McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail 
because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors 
for a guy promoting a vitamin company.  Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. 
security t risk.
 
 Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a  cleverly structured 
way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
 
 Why did these foreign  interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why 
not donate directly to the Clinton  Foundation?  Better yet, why not donate  
money directly to the people, organizations and  countries in need?
 
 This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
 
 Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000  e-mails was a risk she was 
willing to take.
 
 Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, and they 
are Slick!   Warning:  They could be back in the White House in January 2017.  
Don't let it happen.  Remember, most people are not well informed.  You must 
inform and educate them.
         
 

  

[FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?

[jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

He wants to take a DNA test to prove the truth.
 

 http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html 
http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lakshman Joo

[Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]]

Very relevant for a lot more than that.  See how limited knowledge is 
when you only get it from books?  Even Dr. Lad explains it better than 
that.  I would urge people to watch the video and try some swara yoga.


On 11/01/2015 06:10 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:


Trying breathing out of your left nostril for a change.

Ida, Pingala or Madyamais only relevant if you are going somewhere.
I don't need to go somewhere to "get samâdhi".
For that matter, unless I'm doing tapasya, I don't need to cool down 
or heat up.


However, I recognize that a discussion with you is like having one 
with Barry.

In the end,it is just posturing.

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Universe Could Have a Billion Trillion Earth-like Planets

[salyavin808]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 On 10/29/2015 11:43 PM, salyavin808 wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
 mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 Are some of these scientists insecure or something?  I mean, we're getting 
"scientist" probably in their 20s declaring things and they really haven't had 
much experience in life.   Everyday we get proclamations some which conflict 
with another group's proclamations the week before.  Some are just really, 
really lame.  I would give them a D if I were their professor.
 
 
 I'm intrigued to know what "experience in life" you could have that would make 
you more likely to know how much matter there is in distant galaxies. Surely 
it's a matter of measuring gravitational rotation and studying 
spectroheliographs of emitted light?




 
 I'm intrigued by how you misunderstand what the term "experience in life" 
means.  It means "mature thinking".  That's why I'm wondering if these ideas 
are those of millennial scientists. 
 Nice try, but it still doesn't explain how mature" one would need to be to 
operate data gathereing equipment. PHD level would do just fine.
 
 
 Logically the way we see things in nature work of course it is entirely 
possible there are earth like planets throughout the universe.  But why make 
the stupid statement that this planet is among the first.  More likely many, 
many "Earths" have come and gone.  That is a more logical assumption.
 

 Not logical at all if you understand the universe to be a particular age and 
that it took time for stellar processes to create the heavy matter necessary 
for planets like ours.
 

 It's a matter of atomic complexity. The first generation of atoms were 75% 
hydrogen, it was the supernovae of the first stars that created the next level 
of complexity by fusing atomic nuclei together to make heavier elements. It 
takes four generations of stars forming and collapsing to create carbon:





 
 However that too is just a theory. There's no "just" about it. We know how 
atoms are made and what they are made of, know what the universe was made of 
when it started and we know that stars create heavy matter out of light 
particles. Unless someone magicked it all into being and our knowledge of 
particle physics is a coincidence, I would say we have a bonafide explanation. 
 
 

 FORMATION OF THE HIGHER MASS ELEMENTS 
 
 
 
 FORMATION OF THE HIGHER MASS ELEMENTS Formation of the High Mass Elements 
(What Happens Inside a Star) ABSTRACT Once the universe was created by the Big 
Bang, the only abundant elements prese...


 
 View on aether.lbl.gov 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  
 
 
 On 10/29/2015 02:44 PM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:
 
   According to a new research by astronomers.  Essentially, they're saying 
consciousness is present everywhere in the universe, which MMY stated in his 
books.  But Carl Sagan supposedly stated that the golden records on the Voyager 
probe may be found by another intelligent species which have not yet existed 
today.  Or, that the records would eventually wither away in outer space 
without being discovered by any intelligent beings.
 
 
 Our Planet Is Among the First of Many, Many Earths
 
 
 
 
 
 Our Planet Is Among the First of Many, Many Earths A new study finds the 
universe is chock-full of materials for making Earth-like planets, but most of 
them haven't formed yet.


 
 View on www.theatlantic.com 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

 





 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Universe Could Have a Billion Trillion Earth-like Planets

[Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]]

On 11/02/2015 12:02 PM, salyavin808 wrote:





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

On 10/29/2015 11:43 PM, salyavin808 wrote:





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
, 
 wrote :

Are some of these scientists insecure or something?  I mean,
we're getting "scientist" probably in their 20s declaring things
and they really haven't had much experience in life.   Everyday
we get proclamations some which conflict with another group's
proclamations the week before.  Some are just really, really
lame.  I would give them a D if I were their professor.

I'm intrigued to know what "experience in life" you could have
that would make you more likely to know how much matter there is
in distant galaxies. Surely it's a matter of measuring
gravitational rotation and studying spectroheliographs of emitted
light?


I'm intrigued by how you misunderstand what the term "experience
in life" means.  It means "mature thinking".  That's why I'm
wondering if these ideas are those of millennial scientists.


Nice try, but it still doesn't explain how mature" one would need
to be to operate data gathereing equipment. PHD level would do
just fine.



Having a doctorate degree just means you passed the tests, published a 
thesis and boards to get one.  All that information is generally just 
theory.  Just ask a tenured professor about it.  He'll probably tell 
about all the shitty PhD candidates they get.  After they've been out of 
college a couple years then they begin to learn how the world really 
works.  Didn't you think you knew everything up until you were 30?  Or 
do you still think you know everything because you practiced TM which 
would give you "the home of all knowledge?" Psst, still doesn't mean you 
know everything.






Logically the way we see things in nature work of course it is
entirely possible there are earth like planets throughout the
universe.  But why make the stupid statement that this planet is
among the first.  More likely many, many "Earths" have come and
gone.  That is a more logical assumption.

Not logical at all if you understand the universe to be a
particular age and that it took time for stellar processes to
create the heavy matter necessary for planets like ours.

It's a matter of atomic complexity. The first generation of atoms
were 75% hydrogen, it was the supernovae of the first stars that
created the next level of complexity by fusing atomic nuclei
together to make heavier elements. It takes four generations of
stars forming and collapsing to create carbon:


However that too is just a theory.

There's no "just" about it. We know how atoms are made and what
they are made of, know what the universe was made of when it
started and we know that stars create heavy matter out of light
particles. Unless someone magicked it all into being and our
knowledge of particle physics is a coincidence, I would say we
have a bonafide explanation.



No, that's just a theory too. It could even be completely wrong!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KThlYHfIVa8






FORMATION OF THE HIGHER MASS ELEMENTS




image



FORMATION OF THE HIGHER MASS ELEMENTS

Formation of the High Mass Elements (What Happens Inside a Star)
ABSTRACT Once the universe was created by the Big Bang, the only
abundant elements prese...

View on aether.lbl.gov


Preview by Yahoo



On 10/29/2015 02:44 PM, jr_esq@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:


According to a new research by astronomers.  Essentially,
they're saying consciousness is present everywhere in the
universe, which MMY stated in his books.  But Carl Sagan
supposedly stated that the golden records on the Voyager probe
may be found by another intelligent species which have not yet
existed today.  Or, that the records would eventually wither
away in outer space without being discovered by any intelligent
beings.


Our Planet Is Among the First of Many, Many Earths






image




Our Planet Is Among the First of Many, Many Earths



A new study finds the universe is chock-full 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The greatest political pop song

[dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 
 Part of the Union [TM Movement] 
 Could be 'political' satire too for TM.
 There is dis-enfranchised sentiment in the meditating community that could 
hope for more 'authenticity' in the movement community.
 Substitute “movement” for “union” and other substitutions and it could work as 
a rallying pop song for the meditating community...
 
 
 “Now I'm a [movement] man
Amazed at what I am
I say what I think, that the company stinks
Yes I'm a union man
 When we meet in the local hall
I'll be voting with them all
With a hell of a shout, it's "Out [meditators], out!"
And the rise of the factory's fall
 Oh, you don't get me, I'm part of the union
You don't get me, I'm part of the union
You don't get me, I'm part of the union
Until the day I die, until the day I die
 As a union man I'm wise
To the lies of the company spies
And I don't get fooled by the factory rules
'Cause I always read between the lines
 And I always get my way
If I strike for higher pay
When I show my card to the Scotland Yard
And this is what I say
 Oh, oh, you don't get me, I'm part of the union
You don't get me, I'm part of the union.. etc.”
 
 
 
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected. 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 

 
 Wednesday, October 28, 2015 Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton 
  
 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k 
emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references 
to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
 
 The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing 
it.
 
 Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax 
free international money laundering scheme.  It may eventually prove to be the 
largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
 
 This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and 
repackage it to be used for your own purposes.  All tax free.  Here's how it 
works:
 
 1. You create  a separate foreign "charity."  In this case one in Canada.
 
 2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.   
In this case, over 1,000 did  -- contributing mega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this out of  the  goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. 
(Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold 
 millions to a  Canadian charity).
 
 3. The Canadian charity then  bundles these separate donations and makes a 
massive donation to theClinton Foundation.
 
 4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating  Canadian charity claim Canadian 
law prohibits the identification of  individual donors.
 
 5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of  this  money for legitimate 
good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 
10%.  Much of the balance goes to enrich the  Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untold numbers of  hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc.  Again, virtually 
all tax free,which means you and I are subsidizing it.
 
 6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, 
somehow  fails to report much  of this on their tax filings.  They discover 
these "clerical  errors"  and begin the process  of re-filing 5 years of tax 
returns.
 
 7. Net result -- foreign money,  much of it from other countries, goes into 
the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor.  
This is the textbook definition  of money  laundering.
 
 Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank 
Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy who was central to the formation of 
Uranium One,  the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium 
interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This 
transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was 
Secretary of State when the approval was granted.  As an aside, imagine how 
former Virginia Governor Bob  McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail 
because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors 
for a guy promoting a vitamin company.  Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. 
security t risk.
 
 Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a  cleverly structured 
way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
 
 Why did these foreign  interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why 
not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation?  Better yet, why not donate  
money directly to the people, organizations and  countries in need?
 
 This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
 
 Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000  e-mails was a risk she was 
willing to take.
 
 Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, and they 
are Slick!   Warning:  They could be back in the White House in January 2017.  
Don't let it happen.  Remember, most people are not well informed.  You must 
inform and educate them.

 
https://www.blogger.com/share-post.g?blogID=3694913175605954860=3820829889481051343=email














  
  
  
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't 
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his 
message accuses somebody of criminal acts.
 

 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

  Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here. However, I would agree that 
you won't find anything like this in the mainstream media, regardless of how 
factual it is. "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 


 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 
   FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.
 

 

 

 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 

 
 Wednesday, October 28, 2015 Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton 
  
 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k 
emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references 
to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
 
 The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing 
it.
 
 Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax 
free international money laundering scheme.  It may eventually prove to be the 
largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
 
 This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and 
repackage it to be used for your own purposes.  All tax free.  Here's how it 
works:
 
 1. You create  a separate foreign "charity."  In this case one in Canada.
 
 2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.   
In this case, over 1,000 did  -- contributing mega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this out of  the  goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. 
(Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold 
 millions to a  Canadian charity).
 
 3. The Canadian charity then  bundles these separate donations and makes a 
massive donation to theClinton Foundation.
 
 4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating  Canadian charity claim Canadian 
law prohibits the identification of  individual donors.
 
 5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of  this  money for legitimate 
good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 
10%.  Much of the balance goes to enrich the  Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untold numbers of  hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc.  Again, virtually 
all tax free,which means you and I are subsidizing it.
 
 6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, 
somehow  fails to report much  of this on their tax filings.  They discover 
these "clerical  errors"  and begin the process  of re-filing 5 years of tax 
returns.
 
 7. Net result -- foreign money,  much of it from other countries, goes into 
the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor.  
This is the textbook definition  of money  laundering.
 
 Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank 
Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy who was central to the formation of 
Uranium One,  the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium 
interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This 
transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was 
Secretary of State when the approval was granted.  As an aside, imagine how 
former Virginia Governor Bob  McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail 
because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors 
for a guy promoting a vitamin company.  Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. 
security t risk.
 
 Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a  cleverly structured 
way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
 
 Why did these foreign  interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why 
not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation?  Better yet, why not donate  
money directly to the people, organizations and  countries in need?
 
 This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
 
 Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000  e-mails was a risk she was 
willing to take.
 
 Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, and they 
are Slick!   Warning:  They could be back in the White House in January 2017.  
Don't let it happen.  Remember, most people are not well informed.  You must 
inform and 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

P.S.: In jurisprudence, it's called "impeaching the witness" and is entirely 
legal. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't 
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his 
message accuses somebody of criminal acts.
 

 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

  Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here. However, I would agree that 
you won't find anything like this in the mainstream media, regardless of how 
factual it is. "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 


 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 
   FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.
 

 

 

 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 

 
 Wednesday, October 28, 2015 Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton 
  
 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k 
emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references 
to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
 
 The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing 
it.
 
 Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax 
free international money laundering scheme.  It may eventually prove to be the 
largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
 
 This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and 
repackage it to be used for your own purposes.  All tax free.  Here's how it 
works:
 
 1. You create  a separate foreign "charity."  In this case one in Canada.
 
 2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.   
In this case, over 1,000 did  -- contributing mega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this out of  the  goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. 
(Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold 
 millions to a  Canadian charity).
 
 3. The Canadian charity then  bundles these separate donations and makes a 
massive donation to theClinton Foundation.
 
 4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating  Canadian charity claim Canadian 
law prohibits the identification of  individual donors.
 
 5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of  this  money for legitimate 
good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 
10%.  Much of the balance goes to enrich the  Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untold numbers of  hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc.  Again, virtually 
all tax free,which means you and I are subsidizing it.
 
 6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, 
somehow  fails to report much  of this on their tax filings.  They discover 
these "clerical  errors"  and begin the process  of re-filing 5 years of tax 
returns.
 
 7. Net result -- foreign money,  much of it from other countries, goes into 
the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor.  
This is the textbook definition  of money  laundering.
 
 Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank 
Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy who was central to the formation of 
Uranium One,  the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium 
interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This 
transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was 
Secretary of State when the approval was granted.  As an aside, imagine how 
former Virginia Governor Bob  McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail 
because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors 
for a guy promoting a vitamin company.  Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. 
security t risk.
 
 Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a  cleverly structured 
way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
 
 Why did these foreign  interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why 
not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation?  Better yet, why not donate  
money directly to the people, organizations and  countries in need?
 
 This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
 
 Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000  e-mails was a risk she was 
willing to take.
 
 Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, and they 
are Slick!   

Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?

[jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

I don't think he'd appreciate being called a cow.  With the reputation he had 
during his younger days,  he could be called a "stud".  Be that as it may, he 
was and still is a great entertainer.  From what I've read, he passed out while 
singing the ending to the song, "Thunderball".
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Big dark patches? Holstein maybe. 
 

 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:04 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 
   
 He wants to take a DNA test to prove the truth.
 

 http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html 
http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Big dark patches? Holstein maybe. 

  From: "jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:04 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
   
    He wants to take a DNA test to prove the truth.
http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html










  #yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409 -- #yiv0661057409ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409ygrp-mkp #yiv0661057409hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409ygrp-mkp #yiv0661057409ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409ygrp-mkp .yiv0661057409ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409ygrp-mkp .yiv0661057409ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409ygrp-mkp .yiv0661057409ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv0661057409ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409ygrp-sponsor #yiv0661057409ygrp-lc #yiv0661057409hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409ygrp-sponsor #yiv0661057409ygrp-lc .yiv0661057409ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv0661057409
 #yiv0661057409activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409activity span 
.yiv0661057409underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv0661057409 
.yiv0661057409attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv0661057409 .yiv0661057409attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv0661057409 .yiv0661057409attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv0661057409 .yiv0661057409attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv0661057409 .yiv0661057409attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv0661057409 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv0661057409 .yiv0661057409bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv0661057409 
.yiv0661057409bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv0661057409 dd.yiv0661057409last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv0661057409 dd.yiv0661057409last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv0661057409 
dd.yiv0661057409last p span.yiv0661057409yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv0661057409 div.yiv0661057409attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv0661057409 div.yiv0661057409attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv0661057409 div.yiv0661057409file-title a, #yiv0661057409 
div.yiv0661057409file-title a:active, #yiv0661057409 
div.yiv0661057409file-title a:hover, #yiv0661057409 div.yiv0661057409file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv0661057409 div.yiv0661057409photo-title a, 
#yiv0661057409 div.yiv0661057409photo-title a:active, #yiv0661057409 
div.yiv0661057409photo-title a:hover, #yiv0661057409 
div.yiv0661057409photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv0661057409 
div#yiv0661057409ygrp-mlmsg #yiv0661057409ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv0661057409yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv0661057409 
.yiv0661057409green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv0661057409 .yiv0661057409MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv0661057409 o {font-size:0;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv0661057409
 #yiv0661057409reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv0661057409 .yiv0661057409replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409ygrp-actbar div a:first-child 
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409ygrp-mlmsg 
{font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409ygrp-mlmsg select, #yiv0661057409 input, #yiv0661057409 textarea 
{font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv0661057409 
#yiv0661057409ygrp-mlmsg pre, #yiv0661057409 code {font:115% 
monospace;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409ygrp-mlmsg * 
{line-height:1.22em;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409ygrp-mlmsg #yiv0661057409logo 
{padding-bottom:10px;}#yiv0661057409 #yiv0661057409ygrp-msg p a 
{font-family:Verdana;}#yiv0661057409 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here. However, I would agree that you 
won't find anything like this in the mainstream media, regardless of how 
factual it is. "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 



 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
   
    FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :




Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton
 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alludedthat he had no doubt some of the 
30kemails Hillary deleted from her privateemail server very likely had 
references tothe Clinton Foundation, which would beillegal and a conflict of 
interest.

The Clinton Foundation is "organizedcrime" at ts finest, and we are financingit.

Here is a good, concise summary of how theClinton Foundation works as a tax 
freeinternational money laundering scheme.  Itmay eventually prove to be the 
largestpolitical criminal enterprise in U.S.history.

This is a textbook case on how you hideforeign money sent to you and repackage 
itto be used for your own purposes.  All taxfree.  Here's how it works:

1. You create  a separate foreign"charity."  In this case one in Canada.

2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments,then donate to this Canadian charity.   
Inthis case, over 1,000 did  -- contributingmega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this outof  the  goodness of their hearts, andexpected nothing in return. 
(ImaginePutin's buddies waking up one morning andjust deciding to send untold  
millions toa  Canadian charity).

3. The Canadian charity then  bundlesthese separate donations and makes 
amassive donation to the    ClintonFoundation.

4. The Clinton Foundation and thecooperating  Canadian charity claimCanadian 
law prohibits the identificationof  individual donors.

5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends"some of  this  money for legitimate 
goodworks programs. Unfortunately, expertsbelieve this is on the order of 10%.  
Muchof the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untoldnumbers of  hangers on, and fund lavishtravel, etc.  Again, virtually all 
taxfree,    which means you and I aresubsidizing it.

6. The Clinton Foundation, with access tothe world's best accountants, somehow 
fails to report much  of this on their taxfilings.  They discover these 
"clerical errors"  and begin the process  ofre-filing 5 years of tax returns.

7. Net result -- foreign money,  much ofit from other countries, goes into 
theClinton's pockets tax free and untraceableback to the original donor.  This 
is thetextbook definition  of money  laundering.

Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity"includes as a principal one FrankGiustra. 
 Google him.  He is the guy whowas central to the formation of UraniumOne,  the 
Canadian company that somehowacquired massive U.S. uranium interestsand then 
sold them to an organizationcontrolled by Russia. This transactionrequired U.S. 
State Department approval,and guess who was Secretary of State whenthe approval 
was granted.  As an aside,imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell 
feels. That poor schlep is injail because he and his wife took $165,000in gifts 
and loans for doing minor favorsfor a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not 
legal but not exactly putting U.S.security t risk.

Sarcasm aside, if you're still notpersuaded this was a  cleverly structuredway 
to get unidentified foreign money tothe Clinton's, ask yourself this:

Why did these foreign  interests funnelmoney through a Canadian charity? Why 
notdonate directly to the ClintonFoundation?  Better yet, why not donate money 
directly to the people,organizations and  countries in need?

This is the essence of money launderingand influence peddling.

Now you know why Hillary's destruction of30,000  e-mails was a risk she was 
willingto take.

Bill and Hillary are devious,unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, andthey are 
Slick!   Warning:  They could beback in the White House in January 2017. Don't 
let it happen.  Remember, mostpeople are not well informed.  You mustinform and 
educate them.
   


  #yiv8479133827 -- #yiv8479133827ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv8479133827 
#yiv8479133827ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv8479133827 
#yiv8479133827ygrp-mkp #yiv8479133827hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv8479133827 #yiv8479133827ygrp-mkp #yiv8479133827ads 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

But didn't you just do to him what you're accusing him of doing to Hillary, 
questioning the integrity of the person in question?

  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:20 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
   
    P.S.: In jurisprudence, it's called "impeaching the witness" and is 
entirely legal.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't 
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his 
message accuses somebody of criminal acts.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here. However, I would agree that you 
won't find anything like this in the mainstream media, regardless of how 
factual it is. "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 


 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :




Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton
 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alludedthat he had no doubt some of the 
30kemails Hillary deleted from her privateemail server very likely had 
references tothe Clinton Foundation, which would beillegal and a conflict of 
interest.

The Clinton Foundation is "organizedcrime" at ts finest, and we are financingit.

Here is a good, concise summary of how theClinton Foundation works as a tax 
freeinternational money laundering scheme.  Itmay eventually prove to be the 
largestpolitical criminal enterprise in U.S.history.

This is a textbook case on how you hideforeign money sent to you and repackage 
itto be used for your own purposes.  All taxfree.  Here's how it works:

1. You create  a separate foreign"charity."  In this case one in Canada.

2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments,then donate to this Canadian charity.   
Inthis case, over 1,000 did  -- contributingmega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this outof  the  goodness of their hearts, andexpected nothing in return. 
(ImaginePutin's buddies waking up one morning andjust deciding to send untold  
millions toa  Canadian charity).

3. The Canadian charity then  bundlesthese separate donations and makes 
amassive donation to the    ClintonFoundation.

4. The Clinton Foundation and thecooperating  Canadian charity claimCanadian 
law prohibits the identificationof  individual donors.

5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends"some of  this  money for legitimate 
goodworks programs. Unfortunately, expertsbelieve this is on the order of 10%.  
Muchof the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untoldnumbers of  hangers on, and fund lavishtravel, etc.  Again, virtually all 
taxfree,    which means you and I aresubsidizing it.

6. The Clinton Foundation, with access tothe world's best accountants, somehow 
fails to report much  of this on their taxfilings.  They discover these 
"clerical errors"  and begin the process  ofre-filing 5 years of tax returns.

7. Net result -- foreign money,  much ofit from other countries, goes into 
theClinton's pockets tax free and untraceableback to the original donor.  This 
is thetextbook definition  of money  laundering.

Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity"includes as a principal one FrankGiustra. 
 Google him.  He is the guy whowas central to the formation of UraniumOne,  the 
Canadian company that somehowacquired massive U.S. uranium interestsand then 
sold them to an organizationcontrolled by Russia. This transactionrequired U.S. 
State Department approval,and guess who was Secretary of State whenthe approval 
was granted.  As an aside,imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell 
feels. That poor schlep is injail because he and his wife took $165,000in gifts 
and loans for doing minor favorsfor a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not 
legal but not exactly putting U.S.security t risk.

Sarcasm aside, if you're still notpersuaded this was a  cleverly structuredway 
to get unidentified foreign money tothe Clinton's, ask yourself this:

Why did these foreign  interests funnelmoney through a Canadian charity? Why 
notdonate directly to the ClintonFoundation?  Better yet, why not donate money 
directly to the people,organizations and  countries in need?

This is the essence of 

[FairfieldLife] Post Count Tue 03-Nov-15 00:15:05 UTC

[FFL PostCount ffl.postco...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]]

Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 10/31/15 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 11/07/15 00:00:00
79 messages as of (UTC) 11/03/15 00:07:27

 16 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569
 12 awoelflebater
  9 Bhairitu noozguru
  7 emptybill
  6 jr_esq
  5 dhamiltony2k5
  4 s3raphita
  3 ultrarishi 
  3 jamesalan735
  3 authfriend
  2 feste37 
  2 Dick Mays dickmays
  1 steve.sundur
  1 salyavin808 
  1 mdixon.6569 mdixon.6569
  1 j_alexander_stanley
  1 hepa7
  1 email4you mikemail4you
  1 FairfieldLife
Posters: 19
Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
=
Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
Standard Time (Winter):
US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

No, he said his mother *had large dark patches* and there are Holstein bulls! 
LOL.Naw... that boy could sing, just not my cup of tea.

  From: "jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:20 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
   
    I don't think he'd appreciate being called a cow.  With the reputation he 
had during his younger days,  he could be called a "stud".  Be that as it may, 
he was and still is a great entertainer.  From what I've read, he passed out 
while singing the ending to the song, "Thunderball".


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Big dark patches? Holstein maybe. 

  From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:04 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 He wants to take a DNA test to prove the truth.
http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html












  #yiv9509425770 #yiv9509425770 -- #yiv9509425770ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv9509425770 
#yiv9509425770ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv9509425770 
#yiv9509425770ygrp-mkp #yiv9509425770hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv9509425770 #yiv9509425770ygrp-mkp #yiv9509425770ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv9509425770 #yiv9509425770ygrp-mkp .yiv9509425770ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv9509425770 #yiv9509425770ygrp-mkp .yiv9509425770ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv9509425770 #yiv9509425770ygrp-mkp .yiv9509425770ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9509425770 #yiv9509425770ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv9509425770ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv9509425770 
#yiv9509425770ygrp-sponsor #yiv9509425770ygrp-lc #yiv9509425770hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv9509425770 
#yiv9509425770ygrp-sponsor #yiv9509425770ygrp-lc .yiv9509425770ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv9509425770 #yiv9509425770actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv9509425770 
#yiv9509425770activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv9509425770
 #yiv9509425770activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv9509425770 
#yiv9509425770activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv9509425770 #yiv9509425770activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9509425770 #yiv9509425770activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv9509425770 #yiv9509425770activity span 
.yiv9509425770underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9509425770 
.yiv9509425770attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv9509425770 .yiv9509425770attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9509425770 .yiv9509425770attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv9509425770 .yiv9509425770attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv9509425770 .yiv9509425770attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9509425770 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv9509425770 .yiv9509425770bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv9509425770 
.yiv9509425770bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9509425770 dd.yiv9509425770last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv9509425770 dd.yiv9509425770last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv9509425770 
dd.yiv9509425770last p span.yiv9509425770yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv9509425770 div.yiv9509425770attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9509425770 div.yiv9509425770attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv9509425770 div.yiv9509425770file-title a, #yiv9509425770 
div.yiv9509425770file-title a:active, #yiv9509425770 
div.yiv9509425770file-title a:hover, #yiv9509425770 div.yiv9509425770file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9509425770 div.yiv9509425770photo-title a, 
#yiv9509425770 div.yiv9509425770photo-title a:active, #yiv9509425770 
div.yiv9509425770photo-title a:hover, #yiv9509425770 
div.yiv9509425770photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv9509425770 
div#yiv9509425770ygrp-mlmsg #yiv9509425770ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv9509425770yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv9509425770 
.yiv9509425770green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv9509425770 .yiv9509425770MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv9509425770 o {font-size:0;}#yiv9509425770 
#yiv9509425770photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv9509425770 
#yiv9509425770photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv9509425770 
#yiv9509425770photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv9509425770
 #yiv9509425770reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv9509425770 
#yiv9509425770reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv9509425770 .yiv9509425770replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv9509425770 #yiv9509425770ygrp-actbar 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

BTW, I did the DNA testing he's referring to. 57% western European, 22% 
Irish,17% British, 3% Greek,Italian Iberian, <1% Scandinavian. Always thought 
we were heavier on the British side. Although the Western European influence 
could be Saxon and Norman.

  From: "jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:20 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
   
    I don't think he'd appreciate being called a cow.  With the reputation he 
had during his younger days,  he could be called a "stud".  Be that as it may, 
he was and still is a great entertainer.  From what I've read, he passed out 
while singing the ending to the song, "Thunderball".


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Big dark patches? Holstein maybe. 

  From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:04 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 He wants to take a DNA test to prove the truth.
http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html












  #yiv1272756060 #yiv1272756060 -- #yiv1272756060ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv1272756060 
#yiv1272756060ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv1272756060 
#yiv1272756060ygrp-mkp #yiv1272756060hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv1272756060 #yiv1272756060ygrp-mkp #yiv1272756060ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv1272756060 #yiv1272756060ygrp-mkp .yiv1272756060ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv1272756060 #yiv1272756060ygrp-mkp .yiv1272756060ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv1272756060 #yiv1272756060ygrp-mkp .yiv1272756060ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1272756060 #yiv1272756060ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv1272756060ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv1272756060 
#yiv1272756060ygrp-sponsor #yiv1272756060ygrp-lc #yiv1272756060hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv1272756060 
#yiv1272756060ygrp-sponsor #yiv1272756060ygrp-lc .yiv1272756060ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv1272756060 #yiv1272756060actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv1272756060 
#yiv1272756060activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv1272756060
 #yiv1272756060activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv1272756060 
#yiv1272756060activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv1272756060 #yiv1272756060activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1272756060 #yiv1272756060activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv1272756060 #yiv1272756060activity span 
.yiv1272756060underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1272756060 
.yiv1272756060attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv1272756060 .yiv1272756060attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1272756060 .yiv1272756060attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv1272756060 .yiv1272756060attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv1272756060 .yiv1272756060attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1272756060 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv1272756060 .yiv1272756060bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv1272756060 
.yiv1272756060bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1272756060 dd.yiv1272756060last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1272756060 dd.yiv1272756060last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1272756060 
dd.yiv1272756060last p span.yiv1272756060yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv1272756060 div.yiv1272756060attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1272756060 div.yiv1272756060attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv1272756060 div.yiv1272756060file-title a, #yiv1272756060 
div.yiv1272756060file-title a:active, #yiv1272756060 
div.yiv1272756060file-title a:hover, #yiv1272756060 div.yiv1272756060file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1272756060 div.yiv1272756060photo-title a, 
#yiv1272756060 div.yiv1272756060photo-title a:active, #yiv1272756060 
div.yiv1272756060photo-title a:hover, #yiv1272756060 
div.yiv1272756060photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1272756060 
div#yiv1272756060ygrp-mlmsg #yiv1272756060ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv1272756060yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv1272756060 
.yiv1272756060green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv1272756060 .yiv1272756060MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv1272756060 o {font-size:0;}#yiv1272756060 
#yiv1272756060photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv1272756060 
#yiv1272756060photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv1272756060 
#yiv1272756060photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv1272756060
 #yiv1272756060reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv1272756060 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Well, that was the original meaning but in modern times it's simply trying to 
*destroy the messenger that brings bad news to a cause*. I would think that you 
would be in a position to refute the blogger's assertions. That is usually the 
best way to put a lie to rest.

  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
   
    FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't 
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his 
message accuses somebody of criminal acts.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here. However, I would agree that you 
won't find anything like this in the mainstream media, regardless of how 
factual it is. "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 


 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :




Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton
 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alludedthat he had no doubt some of the 
30kemails Hillary deleted from her privateemail server very likely had 
references tothe Clinton Foundation, which would beillegal and a conflict of 
interest.

The Clinton Foundation is "organizedcrime" at ts finest, and we are financingit.

Here is a good, concise summary of how theClinton Foundation works as a tax 
freeinternational money laundering scheme.  Itmay eventually prove to be the 
largestpolitical criminal enterprise in U.S.history.

This is a textbook case on how you hideforeign money sent to you and repackage 
itto be used for your own purposes.  All taxfree.  Here's how it works:

1. You create  a separate foreign"charity."  In this case one in Canada.

2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments,then donate to this Canadian charity.   
Inthis case, over 1,000 did  -- contributingmega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this outof  the  goodness of their hearts, andexpected nothing in return. 
(ImaginePutin's buddies waking up one morning andjust deciding to send untold  
millions toa  Canadian charity).

3. The Canadian charity then  bundlesthese separate donations and makes 
amassive donation to the    ClintonFoundation.

4. The Clinton Foundation and thecooperating  Canadian charity claimCanadian 
law prohibits the identificationof  individual donors.

5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends"some of  this  money for legitimate 
goodworks programs. Unfortunately, expertsbelieve this is on the order of 10%.  
Muchof the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untoldnumbers of  hangers on, and fund lavishtravel, etc.  Again, virtually all 
taxfree,    which means you and I aresubsidizing it.

6. The Clinton Foundation, with access tothe world's best accountants, somehow 
fails to report much  of this on their taxfilings.  They discover these 
"clerical errors"  and begin the process  ofre-filing 5 years of tax returns.

7. Net result -- foreign money,  much ofit from other countries, goes into 
theClinton's pockets tax free and untraceableback to the original donor.  This 
is thetextbook definition  of money  laundering.

Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity"includes as a principal one FrankGiustra. 
 Google him.  He is the guy whowas central to the formation of UraniumOne,  the 
Canadian company that somehowacquired massive U.S. uranium interestsand then 
sold them to an organizationcontrolled by Russia. This transactionrequired U.S. 
State Department approval,and guess who was Secretary of State whenthe approval 
was granted.  As an aside,imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell 
feels. That poor schlep is injail because he and his wife took $165,000in gifts 
and loans for doing minor favorsfor a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not 
legal but not exactly putting U.S.security t risk.

Sarcasm aside, if you're still notpersuaded this was a  cleverly structuredway 
to get unidentified foreign money tothe Clinton's, ask yourself this:

Why did these foreign  interests funnelmoney through a Canadian charity? Why 
notdonate directly to the ClintonFoundation?  Better yet, why not donate money 
directly to the people,organizations and  countries in need?

This is the essence of money 

[FairfieldLife] "Dawkins Hammers Carson"

[yifux...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Richard Dawkins hammers Ben Carson: He is a ‘disgrace’ as a doctor for 
promoting creationism 
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/11/richard-dawkins-hammers-ben-carson-he-is-ignorant-and-a-disgrace-as-a-doctor-for-promoting-creationism/
 
 
 
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/11/richard-dawkins-hammers-ben-carson-he-is-ignorant-and-a-disgrace-as-a-doctor-for-promoting-creationism/
 
 
 Richard Dawkins hammers Ben Carson: He is a ‘disgrac... 
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/11/richard-dawkins-hammers-ben-carson-he-is-ignorant-and-a-disgrace-as-a-doctor-for-promoting-creationism/
 Anonymous begins publishing alleged KKK members details Confederate flag lover 
throws bomb inside Walmart after online threat: ‘No messing around any...
 
 
 
 View on www.rawstory.com 
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/11/richard-dawkins-hammers-ben-carson-he-is-ignorant-and-a-disgrace-as-a-doctor-for-promoting-creationism/
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  

[FairfieldLife] US President with the Highest IQ

[jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

The top man is John Quincy Adams with an estimated IQ of 168.  He was 
proficient in Latin and Greek
 

  John F Kennedy came in third with an IQ estimated at 150.
 

 John Quincy Adams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Quincy_Adams

 
 
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Quincy_Adams 
 
 John Quincy Adams - Wikipedia, the free encycl... 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Quincy_Adams John Quincy Adams 
(i/ˈkwɪnzi/;[a] July 11, 1767 – February 23, 1848) was an American statesman 
who served as the sixth President of the United States fr...
 
 
 
 View on en.wikipedia.org https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Quincy_Adams 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[FairfieldLife] Fwd: Smart Panhandler

[William Leed wle...@aol.com [FairfieldLife]]

-Original Message-
From: Logan M. Cheek 
To: William Leed 
Sent: Mon, Nov 2, 2015 3:39 pm
Subject: Fwd: Smart Panhandler









  
Fwd:   Smart Panhandler
Every   once in a while you see a great idea and wonder why you didn’t think of 
  it…
  
  



















  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No Ann. I was born here, as were the past ten generations of my family. There 
were no immigration laws to violate when my ancestors came here because there 
was no country. BTW, it was the Native point of view that *no man could own the 
land*. Holy Shit! They were Marxists before Karl Marx! An immigrant is someone 
who enters another *country* to take up residence. S if I'm not 
Native American, neither are so called Native Americans because their ancestors 
*immigrated* here as well, across the Bering Straights from Russia to Alaska. 

 
 

Laws, shmaws. I'm not talking about violating any laws. Being an immigrant is 
not breaking any laws. Hell, I'm an immigrant/dual citizen here in Canada. 
We're all immigrants no matter who we are. Everyone has migrated at some point, 
whether it was their ancestors or whether it was them personally. 
 

 I know we can "own" land in the legal/book sense but I sort of agree with this 
idea that no one can truly own the land, let alone a country. Mike, America is 
not your country to covet or to withhold from others who want to move there. 
What, do you think, has given you the right to decide who is welcome and who is 
not? Certainly not the imagined idea that newcomers will be the only law 
breakers or the only ones to compete for your job. They will not be the only 
ones who might buy that last loaf of your favorite bread or grab the last roll 
of Charmin on the shelf. It might well be your neighbor who gets that coveted 
country club membership or steals your wife. 
 

 Christ man, we're talking human beings here; we're not segregating everyone 
into male/female, black/brown/white, fat/thin, short/tall, hairy/ bald. You 
seem to be a possessor, a stingy kind of guy. Give it up. This planet is for 
all to share, including the plants and animals who know no boundaries other 
than that dictated by climate, growing season or available game. Would you turn 
away the eagle or the hawk that crossed the borders from Mexico? Would you more 
readily welcome Canadian immigrants than you would Muslim ones? What makes you 
the Lord of the Land? The fact that ten generations of Dixons have resided on 
North American soil? The fact that you pay taxes? The fact that you simply 
imagine yourself holding rights that preclude the rights or needs of others?
 
 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 8:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 BTW, I did the DNA testing he's referring to. 57% western European, 22% 
Irish,17% British, 3% Greek,Italian Iberian, <1% Scandinavian. Always thought 
we were heavier on the British side. Although the Western European influence 
could be Saxon and Norman.

 

 You realize what this means, Mike? You're a bonafide 100% immigrant. I didn't 
see one drop of Native American blood in your profile.
 

 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:20 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 
   I don't think he'd appreciate being called a cow.  With the reputation he 
had during his younger days,  he could be called a "stud".  Be that as it may, 
he was and still is a great entertainer.  From what I've read, he passed out 
while singing the ending to the song, "Thunderball".

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Big dark patches? Holstein maybe. 
 

 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:04 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 
   
 He wants to take a DNA test to prove the truth.
 

 http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html 
http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 













 













 


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

In that very debate, Rubio addressed that quite well. While the media had been 
talking about the ten wonderful days of Clinton, they never addressed that she 
had been caught lying about Benghazi. She had sent e-mails to Chelsea and 
Middle eastern leaders the next day,9/12,saying the terrorist attack was from 
an Al Queda like organization. While for the next couple of weeks, she towed 
the administration line that it was a protest that got out of hand caused by a 
video. And she continued that lie by telling the families that they were going 
to *get* that person that put that video out.
So yes, the Media did cover for her.The headlines after the debate pretty much 
declared CNBC the loser. So, the Republican candidates didn't exactly make 
fools of themselves for complaining of a liberal bias in regards   to the line 
of questioning. But it is interesting that you would admit that there were 
some*bad questions*.
  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 9:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
   
    BTW, Mike, the mainstream media would be *thrilled* to be able to document 
a genuine Clinton scandal with actual facts. If they haven't done so this time 
around, it's because the facts just ain't there.
BTW 2, the mainstream media isn't all that "librul." They're centrist. And the 
Republican presidential candidates made fools of themselves accusing CNBC of 
being too liberal--CNBC is almost as right-wing as Fox News. It's a big booster 
of Wall Street; the Tea Party began on CNBC, for pete's sake. The debate 
moderators did ask a few bad questions, but most of them were substantive. 
Those were the questions the candidates really resented and did their best to 
avoid by dumping on the moderators. As far as the candidates are concerned, 
"debates" are for them to stand there and tell everybody how great they are, 
not to be examined on the issues or challenge each other's positions.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't 
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his 
message accuses somebody of criminal acts.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here. However, I would agree that you 
won't find anything like this in the mainstream media, regardless of how 
factual it is. "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 


 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :




Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton

  #yiv2319595770 #yiv2319595770 -- #yiv2319595770ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv2319595770 
#yiv2319595770ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv2319595770 
#yiv2319595770ygrp-mkp #yiv2319595770hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv2319595770 #yiv2319595770ygrp-mkp #yiv2319595770ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv2319595770 #yiv2319595770ygrp-mkp .yiv2319595770ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv2319595770 #yiv2319595770ygrp-mkp .yiv2319595770ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv2319595770 #yiv2319595770ygrp-mkp .yiv2319595770ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2319595770 #yiv2319595770ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv2319595770ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv2319595770 
#yiv2319595770ygrp-sponsor #yiv2319595770ygrp-lc #yiv2319595770hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv2319595770 
#yiv2319595770ygrp-sponsor #yiv2319595770ygrp-lc .yiv2319595770ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv2319595770 #yiv2319595770actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv2319595770 
#yiv2319595770activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv2319595770
 #yiv2319595770activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv2319595770 
#yiv2319595770activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv2319595770 #yiv2319595770activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2319595770 #yiv2319595770activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv2319595770 #yiv2319595770activity span 
.yiv2319595770underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2319595770 

[FairfieldLife] The Richest US President

[jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Way above any other presidents, John F. Kennedy was the richest with an 
estimated net worth of one billion dollars.  But he died too young.
 

 Richest US Presidents | InsideGov 
http://us-presidents.insidegov.com/stories/5025/richest-us-presidents?utm_source=yahooutm_medium=sponsoredutm_campaign=ao.ss.yh.dt.5025#35-John-F-Kennedy

 
 
 
http://us-presidents.insidegov.com/stories/5025/richest-us-presidents?utm_source=yahooutm_medium=sponsoredutm_campaign=ao.ss.yh.dt.5025#35-John-F-Kennedy
 
 
 Richest US Presidents | InsideGov 
http://us-presidents.insidegov.com/stories/5025/richest-us-presidents?utm_source=yahooutm_medium=sponsoredutm_campaign=ao.ss.yh.dt.5025#35-John-F-Kennedy
 How rich are U.S. presidents? We rank every U.S. president by net worth. Some 
presidents like Abraham Lincoln died poor, while others like George Washingt...
 
 
 
 View on us-presidents.insideg... 
http://us-presidents.insidegov.com/stories/5025/richest-us-presidents?utm_source=yahooutm_medium=sponsoredutm_campaign=ao.ss.yh.dt.5025#35-John-F-Kennedy
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Ann, every country has immigration laws, but very few have a social system like 
Europe and North America.. I'm sure China and India each, have a few hundred 
million that they would love to  be relieved of. Do you want them coming to BC 
and straining Canada's resources? If our (western) social system is so advanced 
and essential, wouldn't it be worth preserving? There are only so many tits on 
a sow. Of course there is a theory that the far left would love to create 
complete dependency on such a social system and then over burden it to the 
point of collapse, forcing a  totalitarian communist state to replace it with 
since the masses would be so dependent on it.But then, maybe you don't want any 
laws. Ann- archy!

  From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 9:55 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

No Ann. I was born here, as were the past ten generations of my family. There 
were no immigration laws to violate when my ancestors came here because there 
was no country. BTW, it was the Native point of view that *no man could own the 
land*. Holy Shit! They were Marxists before Karl Marx! An immigrant is someone 
who enters another *country* to take up residence. S if I'm not 
Native American, neither are so called Native Americans because their ancestors 
*immigrated* here as well, across the Bering Straights from Russia to Alaska. 

Laws, shmaws. I'm not talking about violating any laws. Being an immigrant is 
not breaking any laws. Hell, I'm an immigrant/dual citizen here in Canada. 
We're all immigrants no matter who we are. Everyone has migrated at some point, 
whether it was their ancestors or whether it was them personally. 
I know we can "own" land in the legal/book sense but I sort of agree with this 
idea that no one can truly own the land, let alone a country. Mike, America is 
not your country to covet or to withhold from others who want to move there. 
What, do you think, has given you the right to decide who is welcome and who is 
not? Certainly not the imagined idea that newcomers will be the only law 
breakers or the only ones to compete for your job. They will not be the only 
ones who might buy that last loaf of your favorite bread or grab the last roll 
of Charmin on the shelf. It might well be your neighbor who gets that coveted 
country club membership or steals your wife. 
Christ man, we're talking human beings here; we're not segregating everyone 
into male/female, black/brown/white, fat/thin, short/tall, hairy/ bald. You 
seem to be a possessor, a stingy kind of guy. Give it up. This planet is for 
all to share, including the plants and animals who know no boundaries other 
than that dictated by climate, growing season or available game. Would you turn 
away the eagle or the hawk that crossed the borders from Mexico? Would you more 
readily welcome Canadian immigrants than you would Muslim ones? What makes you 
the Lord of the Land? The fact that ten generations of Dixons have resided on 
North American soil? The fact that you pay taxes? The fact that you simply 
imagine yourself holding rights that preclude the rights or needs of others?
  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 8:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

BTW, I did the DNA testing he's referring to. 57% western European, 22% 
Irish,17% British, 3% Greek,Italian Iberian, <1% Scandinavian. Always thought 
we were heavier on the British side. Although the Western European influence 
could be Saxon and Norman.

You realize what this means, Mike? You're a bonafide 100% immigrant. I didn't 
see one drop of Native American blood in your profile.
  From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:20 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 I don't think he'd appreciate being called a cow.  With the reputation he had 
during his younger days,  he could be called a "stud".  Be that as it may, he 
was and still is a great entertainer.  From what I've read, he passed out while 
singing the ending to the song, "Thunderball".


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Big dark patches? Holstein maybe. 

  From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:04 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 He wants to take a DNA test to prove the truth.
http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html
















  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Ann, every country has immigration laws, but very few have a social system 
like Europe and North America.. I'm sure China and India each, have a few 
hundred million that they would love to  be relieved of. Do you want them 
coming to BC and straining Canada's resources? If our (western) social system 
is so advanced and essential, wouldn't it be worth preserving? There are only 
so many tits on a sow. Of course there is a theory that the far left would love 
to create complete dependency on such a social system and then over burden it 
to the point of collapse, forcing a  totalitarian communist state to replace it 
with since the masses would be so dependent on it.
 But then, maybe you don't want any laws. Ann- archy!

 

 Good one! I love it. In fact, I'll take it.
 

 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 9:55 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 No Ann. I was born here, as were the past ten generations of my family. There 
were no immigration laws to violate when my ancestors came here because there 
was no country. BTW, it was the Native point of view that *no man could own the 
land*. Holy Shit! They were Marxists before Karl Marx! An immigrant is someone 
who enters another *country* to take up residence. S if I'm not 
Native American, neither are so called Native Americans because their ancestors 
*immigrated* here as well, across the Bering Straights from Russia to Alaska. 

 
 

Laws, shmaws. I'm not talking about violating any laws. Being an immigrant is 
not breaking any laws. Hell, I'm an immigrant/dual citizen here in Canada. 
We're all immigrants no matter who we are. Everyone has migrated at some point, 
whether it was their ancestors or whether it was them personally. 
 

 I know we can "own" land in the legal/book sense but I sort of agree with this 
idea that no one can truly own the land, let alone a country. Mike, America is 
not your country to covet or to withhold from others who want to move there. 
What, do you think, has given you the right to decide who is welcome and who is 
not? Certainly not the imagined idea that newcomers will be the only law 
breakers or the only ones to compete for your job. They will not be the only 
ones who might buy that last loaf of your favorite bread or grab the last roll 
of Charmin on the shelf. It might well be your neighbor who gets that coveted 
country club membership or steals your wife. 
 

 Christ man, we're talking human beings here; we're not segregating everyone 
into male/female, black/brown/white, fat/thin, short/tall, hairy/ bald. You 
seem to be a possessor, a stingy kind of guy. Give it up. This planet is for 
all to share, including the plants and animals who know no boundaries other 
than that dictated by climate, growing season or available game. Would you turn 
away the eagle or the hawk that crossed the borders from Mexico? Would you more 
readily welcome Canadian immigrants than you would Muslim ones? What makes you 
the Lord of the Land? The fact that ten generations of Dixons have resided on 
North American soil? The fact that you pay taxes? The fact that you simply 
imagine yourself holding rights that preclude the rights or needs of others?
 
 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 8:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 BTW, I did the DNA testing he's referring to. 57% western European, 22% 
Irish,17% British, 3% Greek,Italian Iberian, <1% Scandinavian. Always thought 
we were heavier on the British side. Although the Western European influence 
could be Saxon and Norman.

 

 You realize what this means, Mike? You're a bonafide 100% immigrant. I didn't 
see one drop of Native American blood in your profile.
 

 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:20 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 
   I don't think he'd appreciate being called a cow.  With the reputation he 
had during his younger days,  he could be called a "stud".  Be that as it may, 
he was and still is a great entertainer.  From what I've read, he passed out 
while singing the ending to the song, "Thunderball".

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Big dark patches? Holstein maybe. 
 

 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:04 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 
   

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Richest US President

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

It would be interesting to know what every politician is worth coming into 
office and when they leave. Also, their personal value at the point of each 
piece of legislation that is passed would be worth knowing. Talk about insider 
trading and tips!

  From: "jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 10:03 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Richest US President
   
    Way above any other presidents, John F. Kennedy was the richest with an 
estimated net worth of one billion dollars.  But he died too young.
Richest US Presidents | InsideGov
 
||
||||   Richest US Presidents | InsideGov  How rich are U.S. 
presidents? We rank every U.S. president by net worth. Some presidents like 
Abraham Lincoln died poor, while others like George Washingt...||
| View on us-presidents.insideg...|Preview by Yahoo|
||

 




  #yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169 -- #yiv6794813169ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv6794813169 
#yiv6794813169ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv6794813169 
#yiv6794813169ygrp-mkp #yiv6794813169hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169ygrp-mkp #yiv6794813169ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169ygrp-mkp .yiv6794813169ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169ygrp-mkp .yiv6794813169ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169ygrp-mkp .yiv6794813169ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv6794813169ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv6794813169 
#yiv6794813169ygrp-sponsor #yiv6794813169ygrp-lc #yiv6794813169hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv6794813169 
#yiv6794813169ygrp-sponsor #yiv6794813169ygrp-lc .yiv6794813169ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv6794813169 
#yiv6794813169activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv6794813169
 #yiv6794813169activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv6794813169 
#yiv6794813169activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169activity span 
.yiv6794813169underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv6794813169 
.yiv6794813169attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv6794813169 .yiv6794813169attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv6794813169 .yiv6794813169attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv6794813169 .yiv6794813169attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv6794813169 .yiv6794813169attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv6794813169 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv6794813169 .yiv6794813169bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv6794813169 
.yiv6794813169bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6794813169 dd.yiv6794813169last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv6794813169 dd.yiv6794813169last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv6794813169 
dd.yiv6794813169last p span.yiv6794813169yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv6794813169 div.yiv6794813169attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv6794813169 div.yiv6794813169attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv6794813169 div.yiv6794813169file-title a, #yiv6794813169 
div.yiv6794813169file-title a:active, #yiv6794813169 
div.yiv6794813169file-title a:hover, #yiv6794813169 div.yiv6794813169file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6794813169 div.yiv6794813169photo-title a, 
#yiv6794813169 div.yiv6794813169photo-title a:active, #yiv6794813169 
div.yiv6794813169photo-title a:hover, #yiv6794813169 
div.yiv6794813169photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6794813169 
div#yiv6794813169ygrp-mlmsg #yiv6794813169ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv6794813169yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv6794813169 
.yiv6794813169green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv6794813169 .yiv6794813169MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv6794813169 o {font-size:0;}#yiv6794813169 
#yiv6794813169photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv6794813169 
#yiv6794813169photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv6794813169 
#yiv6794813169photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv6794813169
 #yiv6794813169reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv6794813169 
#yiv6794813169reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv6794813169 .yiv6794813169replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169ygrp-actbar div a:first-child 
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv6794813169 #yiv6794813169ygrp-mlmsg 
{font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

I didn't accuse him of criminal activity, Mike. BIG difference. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 But didn't you just do to him what you're accusing him of doing to Hillary, 
questioning the integrity of the person in question?
 

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:20 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 
   P.S.: In jurisprudence, it's called "impeaching the witness" and is entirely 
legal.
 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't 
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his 
message accuses somebody of criminal acts.
 

 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

  Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here. However, I would agree that 
you won't find anything like this in the mainstream media, regardless of how 
factual it is. "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 


 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 
   FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.
 

 

 

 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 

 
 Wednesday, October 28, 2015 Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton 
  
 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k 
emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references 
to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
 
 The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing 
it.
 
 Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax 
free international money laundering scheme.  It may eventually prove to be the 
largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
 
 This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and 
repackage it to be used for your own purposes.  All tax free.  Here's how it 
works:
 
 1. You create  a separate foreign "charity."  In this case one in Canada.
 
 2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.   
In this case, over 1,000 did  -- contributing mega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this out of  the  goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. 
(Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold 
 millions to a  Canadian charity).
 
 3. The Canadian charity then  bundles these separate donations and makes a 
massive donation to theClinton Foundation.
 
 4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating  Canadian charity claim Canadian 
law prohibits the identification of  individual donors.
 
 5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of  this  money for legitimate 
good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 
10%.  Much of the balance goes to enrich the  Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untold numbers of  hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc.  Again, virtually 
all tax free,which means you and I are subsidizing it.
 
 6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, 
somehow  fails to report much  of this on their tax filings.  They discover 
these "clerical  errors"  and begin the process  of re-filing 5 years of tax 
returns.
 
 7. Net result -- foreign money,  much of it from other countries, goes into 
the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor.  
This is the textbook definition  of money  laundering.
 
 Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank 
Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy who was central to the formation of 
Uranium One,  the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium 
interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This 
transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was 
Secretary of State when the approval was granted.  As an aside, imagine how 
former Virginia Governor Bob  McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail 
because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors 
for a guy promoting a vitamin company.  Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. 
security t risk.
 
 Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a  cleverly structured 
way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself 

Re: [FairfieldLife] US President with the Highest IQ

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

LOL, saw a quote from him today. He didn't like Muslims very much.

  From: "jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 7:24 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] US President with the Highest IQ
   
    The top man is John Quincy Adams with an estimated IQ of 168.  He was 
proficient in Latin and Greek
 John F Kennedy came in third with an IQ estimated at 150.
John Quincy Adams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
||
||||   John Quincy Adams - Wikipedia, the free encycl...  
John Quincy Adams (i/ˈkwɪnzi/;[a] July 11, 1767 – February 23, 1848) was an 
American statesman who served as the sixth President of the United States fr... 
   ||
|  View on en.wikipedia.org  |Preview by Yahoo|
||

 







  #yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275 -- #yiv4648640275ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4648640275 
#yiv4648640275ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4648640275 
#yiv4648640275ygrp-mkp #yiv4648640275hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275ygrp-mkp #yiv4648640275ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275ygrp-mkp .yiv4648640275ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275ygrp-mkp .yiv4648640275ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275ygrp-mkp .yiv4648640275ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv4648640275ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4648640275 
#yiv4648640275ygrp-sponsor #yiv4648640275ygrp-lc #yiv4648640275hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4648640275 
#yiv4648640275ygrp-sponsor #yiv4648640275ygrp-lc .yiv4648640275ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4648640275 
#yiv4648640275activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4648640275
 #yiv4648640275activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4648640275 
#yiv4648640275activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275activity span 
.yiv4648640275underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4648640275 
.yiv4648640275attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv4648640275 .yiv4648640275attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4648640275 .yiv4648640275attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4648640275 .yiv4648640275attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4648640275 .yiv4648640275attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4648640275 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv4648640275 .yiv4648640275bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv4648640275 
.yiv4648640275bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4648640275 dd.yiv4648640275last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4648640275 dd.yiv4648640275last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4648640275 
dd.yiv4648640275last p span.yiv4648640275yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv4648640275 div.yiv4648640275attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4648640275 div.yiv4648640275attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv4648640275 div.yiv4648640275file-title a, #yiv4648640275 
div.yiv4648640275file-title a:active, #yiv4648640275 
div.yiv4648640275file-title a:hover, #yiv4648640275 div.yiv4648640275file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4648640275 div.yiv4648640275photo-title a, 
#yiv4648640275 div.yiv4648640275photo-title a:active, #yiv4648640275 
div.yiv4648640275photo-title a:hover, #yiv4648640275 
div.yiv4648640275photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4648640275 
div#yiv4648640275ygrp-mlmsg #yiv4648640275ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv4648640275yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv4648640275 
.yiv4648640275green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv4648640275 .yiv4648640275MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv4648640275 o {font-size:0;}#yiv4648640275 
#yiv4648640275photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv4648640275 
#yiv4648640275photos div div {border:1px solid 
#66;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;}#yiv4648640275 
#yiv4648640275photos div label 
{color:#66;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;}#yiv4648640275
 #yiv4648640275reco-category {font-size:77%;}#yiv4648640275 
#yiv4648640275reco-desc {font-size:77%;}#yiv4648640275 .yiv4648640275replbq 
{margin:4px;}#yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275ygrp-actbar div a:first-child 
{margin-right:2px;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4648640275 #yiv4648640275ygrp-mlmsg 
{font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;}#yiv4648640275 
#yiv4648640275ygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;}#yiv4648640275 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

  Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here.
 

 This is not strictly true. You chose to be the "messenger", the one who 
disseminated this type of "message" and so you are fair game. Anyone can 
continue to post all sorts of unsubtantiated drivel, like that German nurse BS 
about violent immigrant hospital patients, and I think we should all be held 
responsible for doing so. Why spread more negativity? If this article is full 
of true facts then great, but sometimes doing one's homework is necessary, 
especially if the message is powerful or particularly damning in some way.
 

  However, I would agree that you won't find anything like this in the 
mainstream media, regardless of how factual it is. "authfriend@... 
[FairfieldLife]" 
 


 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 
   FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.
 

 

 

 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 

 
 Wednesday, October 28, 2015 Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton 
  
 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k 
emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references 
to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
 
 The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing 
it.
 
 Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax 
free international money laundering scheme.  It may eventually prove to be the 
largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
 
 This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and 
repackage it to be used for your own purposes.  All tax free.  Here's how it 
works:
 
 1. You create  a separate foreign "charity."  In this case one in Canada.
 
 2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.   
In this case, over 1,000 did  -- contributing mega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this out of  the  goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. 
(Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold 
 millions to a  Canadian charity).
 
 3. The Canadian charity then  bundles these separate donations and makes a 
massive donation to theClinton Foundation.
 
 4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating  Canadian charity claim Canadian 
law prohibits the identification of  individual donors.
 
 5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of  this  money for legitimate 
good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 
10%.  Much of the balance goes to enrich the  Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untold numbers of  hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc.  Again, virtually 
all tax free,which means you and I are subsidizing it.
 
 6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, 
somehow  fails to report much  of this on their tax filings.  They discover 
these "clerical  errors"  and begin the process  of re-filing 5 years of tax 
returns.
 
 7. Net result -- foreign money,  much of it from other countries, goes into 
the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor.  
This is the textbook definition  of money  laundering.
 
 Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank 
Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy who was central to the formation of 
Uranium One,  the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium 
interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This 
transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was 
Secretary of State when the approval was granted.  As an aside, imagine how 
former Virginia Governor Bob  McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail 
because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors 
for a guy promoting a vitamin company.  Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. 
security t risk.
 
 Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a  cleverly structured 
way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
 
 Why did these foreign  interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why 
not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation?  Better yet, why not donate  
money directly to the people, organizations and  countries in need?
 
 This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
 
 Now you know 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 BTW, I did the DNA testing he's referring to. 57% western European, 22% 
Irish,17% British, 3% Greek,Italian Iberian, <1% Scandinavian. Always thought 
we were heavier on the British side. Although the Western European influence 
could be Saxon and Norman.

 

 You realize what this means, Mike? You're a bonafide 100% immigrant. I didn't 
see one drop of Native American blood in your profile.
 

 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:20 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 
   I don't think he'd appreciate being called a cow.  With the reputation he 
had during his younger days,  he could be called a "stud".  Be that as it may, 
he was and still is a great entertainer.  From what I've read, he passed out 
while singing the ending to the song, "Thunderball".

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Big dark patches? Holstein maybe. 
 

 From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:04 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 
   
 He wants to take a DNA test to prove the truth.
 

 http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html 
http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html?soc_src=mail_trk=ma

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 













 


 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lakshman Joo

[emptyb...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

See how limited knowledge is when you only get it from books? 

So have you been out to any part of bhu-mandala yet?
Didn't think so. For someone who professes to be a tantrika, such experiences 
exceeds you because you are a prisoner of your physical senses. You don't get 
to first see and then interact with bhu-mandala and its beings because you 
practice kali-pujas. 

However, I'll have to try out the practice of turning away and enlivening left 
nostril breathing to pacify the spouse. I wasn't married when I examined 
Swarúdaya the first time, so I have to give credit to these really important 
parts of the tantra teaching of this lineage.

No doubt the bitches will cower in awe.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Lakshman Joo

[Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]]

You are a man of preconceived notions.

On 11/02/2015 06:40 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:


See how limited knowledge is when you only get it from books?

So have you been out to any part of bhu-mandala yet?
Didn't think so. For someone who professes to be a tantrika, such 
experiences exceeds you because you are a prisoner of your physical 
senses. You don't get to first see and then interact with bhu-mandala 
and its beings because you practice kali-pujas.


However, I'll have to try out the practice of turning away and 
enlivening left nostril breathing to pacify the spouse. I wasn't 
married when I examined Swarúdaya the first time, so I have to give 
credit to these really important parts of the tantra teaching of this 
lineage.


No doubt the bitches will cower in awe.

[FairfieldLife] For Example...

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Speaking of creating mayhem and possibly ruining people's lives and careers, 
this organization is outing supposed members of the KKK. Most of us love to 
hate the KKK but is this legit? Is it right/true and can it be substantiated?
 
https://www.facebook.com/topic/Ku-Klux-Klan/108381552519797?source=whfrtposition=3trqid=6212746851414288060
 
https://www.facebook.com/topic/Ku-Klux-Klan/108381552519797?source=whfrtposition=3trqid=6212746851414288060

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

No Ann. I was born here, as were the past ten generations of my family. There 
were no immigration laws to violate when my ancestors came here because there 
was no country. BTW, it was the Native point of view that *no man could own the 
land*. Holy Shit! They were Marxists before Karl Marx! An immigrant is someone 
who enters another *country* to take up residence. S if I'm not 
Native American, neither are so called Native Americans because their ancestors 
*immigrated* here as well, across the Bering Straights from Russia to Alaska. 

  From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 8:27 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

BTW, I did the DNA testing he's referring to. 57% western European, 22% 
Irish,17% British, 3% Greek,Italian Iberian, <1% Scandinavian. Always thought 
we were heavier on the British side. Although the Western European influence 
could be Saxon and Norman.

You realize what this means, Mike? You're a bonafide 100% immigrant. I didn't 
see one drop of Native American blood in your profile.
  From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:20 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 I don't think he'd appreciate being called a cow.  With the reputation he had 
during his younger days,  he could be called a "stud".  Be that as it may, he 
was and still is a great entertainer.  From what I've read, he passed out while 
singing the ending to the song, "Thunderball".


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Big dark patches? Holstein maybe. 

  From: "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 2:04 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Does Tom Jones Have Black Ancestry?
 
 He wants to take a DNA test to prove the truth.
http://news.yahoo.com/tom-jones-wants-dna-test-black-ancestry-134033058.html














  #yiv1978964578 #yiv1978964578 -- #yiv1978964578ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv1978964578 
#yiv1978964578ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv1978964578 
#yiv1978964578ygrp-mkp #yiv1978964578hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv1978964578 #yiv1978964578ygrp-mkp #yiv1978964578ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv1978964578 #yiv1978964578ygrp-mkp .yiv1978964578ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv1978964578 #yiv1978964578ygrp-mkp .yiv1978964578ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv1978964578 #yiv1978964578ygrp-mkp .yiv1978964578ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1978964578 #yiv1978964578ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv1978964578ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv1978964578 
#yiv1978964578ygrp-sponsor #yiv1978964578ygrp-lc #yiv1978964578hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv1978964578 
#yiv1978964578ygrp-sponsor #yiv1978964578ygrp-lc .yiv1978964578ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv1978964578 #yiv1978964578actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv1978964578 
#yiv1978964578activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv1978964578
 #yiv1978964578activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv1978964578 
#yiv1978964578activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv1978964578 #yiv1978964578activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1978964578 #yiv1978964578activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv1978964578 #yiv1978964578activity span 
.yiv1978964578underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1978964578 
.yiv1978964578attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv1978964578 .yiv1978964578attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1978964578 .yiv1978964578attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv1978964578 .yiv1978964578attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv1978964578 .yiv1978964578attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1978964578 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv1978964578 .yiv1978964578bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv1978964578 
.yiv1978964578bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1978964578 dd.yiv1978964578last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1978964578 dd.yiv1978964578last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1978964578 
dd.yiv1978964578last p span.yiv1978964578yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv1978964578 div.yiv1978964578attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1978964578 div.yiv1978964578attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv1978964578 div.yiv1978964578file-title a, #yiv1978964578 
div.yiv1978964578file-title a:active, #yiv1978964578 
div.yiv1978964578file-title a:hover, #yiv1978964578 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

It's meaningless if the messenger isn't blameless. Of course you want people to 
know if the messenger is unreliable and biased. It's a warning that they should 
reserve judgment. 

 He makes too many assertions for me to check them out; I don't have the time 
or resources. And I never said he lied. I'll just have to hear it from a source 
I trust before I'll believe it.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Well, that was the original meaning but in modern times it's simply trying to 
*destroy the messenger that brings bad news to a cause*. I would think that you 
would be in a position to refute the blogger's assertions. That is usually the 
best way to put a lie to rest.
 

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 
   
 FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't 
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his 
message accuses somebody of criminal acts.
 

 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

  Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here. However, I would agree that 
you won't find anything like this in the mainstream media, regardless of how 
factual it is. "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 


 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 
   FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.
 

 

 

 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 

 
 Wednesday, October 28, 2015 Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton 
  
 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k 
emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references 
to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
 
 The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing 
it.
 
 Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax 
free international money laundering scheme.  It may eventually prove to be the 
largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
 
 This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and 
repackage it to be used for your own purposes.  All tax free.  Here's how it 
works:
 
 1. You create  a separate foreign "charity."  In this case one in Canada.
 
 2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.   
In this case, over 1,000 did  -- contributing mega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this out of  the  goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. 
(Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold 
 millions to a  Canadian charity).
 
 3. The Canadian charity then  bundles these separate donations and makes a 
massive donation to theClinton Foundation.
 
 4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating  Canadian charity claim Canadian 
law prohibits the identification of  individual donors.
 
 5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of  this  money for legitimate 
good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 
10%.  Much of the balance goes to enrich the  Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untold numbers of  hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc.  Again, virtually 
all tax free,which means you and I are subsidizing it.
 
 6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, 
somehow  fails to report much  of this on their tax filings.  They discover 
these "clerical  errors"  and begin the process  of re-filing 5 years of tax 
returns.
 
 7. Net result -- foreign money,  much of it from other countries, goes into 
the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor.  
This is the textbook definition  of money  laundering.
 
 Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank 
Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy who was central to the formation of 
Uranium One,  the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium 
interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This 
transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was 
Secretary of State when the approval was granted.  As an aside, imagine how 
former Virginia Governor Bob  McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail 
because he and his wife took 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't 
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his 
message accuses somebody of criminal acts.
 

 I just saw this. I tend to work up with oldest posts to newer ones and respond 
to each post as I go before reading the newer ones.
 

 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

  Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here. However, I would agree that 
you won't find anything like this in the mainstream media, regardless of how 
factual it is. "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 


 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 
   FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.
 

 

 

 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 

 
 Wednesday, October 28, 2015 Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton 
  
 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k 
emails Hillary deleted from her private email server very likely had references 
to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
 
 The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at ts finest, and we are financing 
it.
 
 Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax 
free international money laundering scheme.  It may eventually prove to be the 
largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
 
 This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and 
repackage it to be used for your own purposes.  All tax free.  Here's how it 
works:
 
 1. You create  a separate foreign "charity."  In this case one in Canada.
 
 2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity.   
In this case, over 1,000 did  -- contributing mega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this out of  the  goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. 
(Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold 
 millions to a  Canadian charity).
 
 3. The Canadian charity then  bundles these separate donations and makes a 
massive donation to theClinton Foundation.
 
 4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating  Canadian charity claim Canadian 
law prohibits the identification of  individual donors.
 
 5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of  this  money for legitimate 
good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 
10%.  Much of the balance goes to enrich the  Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untold numbers of  hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc.  Again, virtually 
all tax free,which means you and I are subsidizing it.
 
 6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, 
somehow  fails to report much  of this on their tax filings.  They discover 
these "clerical  errors"  and begin the process  of re-filing 5 years of tax 
returns.
 
 7. Net result -- foreign money,  much of it from other countries, goes into 
the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor.  
This is the textbook definition  of money  laundering.
 
 Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank 
Giustra.  Google him.  He is the guy who was central to the formation of 
Uranium One,  the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium 
interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This 
transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was 
Secretary of State when the approval was granted.  As an aside, imagine how 
former Virginia Governor Bob  McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail 
because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors 
for a guy promoting a vitamin company.  Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. 
security t risk.
 
 Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a  cleverly structured 
way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
 
 Why did these foreign  interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why 
not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation?  Better yet, why not donate  
money directly to the people, organizations and  countries in need?
 
 This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
 
 Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000  e-mails was a risk she was 
willing to take.
 
 Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Fair enough.

  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 8:14 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
   
    It's meaningless if the messenger isn't blameless. Of course you want 
people to know if the messenger is unreliable and biased. It's a warning that 
they should reserve judgment.
He makes too many assertions for me to check them out; I don't have the time or 
resources. And I never said he lied. I'll just have to hear it from a source I 
trust before I'll believe it.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Well, that was the original meaning but in modern times it's simply trying to 
*destroy the messenger that brings bad news to a cause*. I would think that you 
would be in a position to refute the blogger's assertions. That is usually the 
best way to put a lie to rest.

  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 4:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't 
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his 
message accuses somebody of criminal acts.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here. However, I would agree that you 
won't find anything like this in the mainstream media, regardless of how 
factual it is. "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 


 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.






---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :




Wednesday, October 28, 2015

Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton
 Recently, Charles  Krauthammer alludedthat he had no doubt some of the 
30kemails Hillary deleted from her privateemail server very likely had 
references tothe Clinton Foundation, which would beillegal and a conflict of 
interest.

The Clinton Foundation is "organizedcrime" at ts finest, and we are financingit.

Here is a good, concise summary of how theClinton Foundation works as a tax 
freeinternational money laundering scheme.  Itmay eventually prove to be the 
largestpolitical criminal enterprise in U.S.history.

This is a textbook case on how you hideforeign money sent to you and repackage 
itto be used for your own purposes.  All taxfree.  Here's how it works:

1. You create  a separate foreign"charity."  In this case one in Canada.

2.  Foreign oligarchs and governments,then donate to this Canadian charity.   
Inthis case, over 1,000 did  -- contributingmega millions.  I'm sure they did 
this outof  the  goodness of their hearts, andexpected nothing in return. 
(ImaginePutin's buddies waking up one morning andjust deciding to send untold  
millions toa  Canadian charity).

3. The Canadian charity then  bundlesthese separate donations and makes 
amassive donation to the    ClintonFoundation.

4. The Clinton Foundation and thecooperating  Canadian charity claimCanadian 
law prohibits the identificationof  individual donors.

5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends"some of  this  money for legitimate 
goodworks programs. Unfortunately, expertsbelieve this is on the order of 10%.  
Muchof the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries   To  
untoldnumbers of  hangers on, and fund lavishtravel, etc.  Again, virtually all 
taxfree,    which means you and I aresubsidizing it.

6. The Clinton Foundation, with access tothe world's best accountants, somehow 
fails to report much  of this on their taxfilings.  They discover these 
"clerical errors"  and begin the process  ofre-filing 5 years of tax returns.

7. Net result -- foreign money,  much ofit from other countries, goes into 
theClinton's pockets tax free and untraceableback to the original donor.  This 
is thetextbook definition  of money  laundering.

Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity"includes as a principal one FrankGiustra. 
 Google him.  He is the guy whowas central to the formation of UraniumOne,  the 
Canadian company that somehowacquired massive U.S. uranium interestsand then 
sold them to an organizationcontrolled by Russia. This transactionrequired U.S. 
State Department approval,and guess who was Secretary of State whenthe approval 
was granted.  

[FairfieldLife] Re: Lakshman Joo

[awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 See how limited knowledge is when you only get it from books? 

So have you been out to any part of bhu-mandala yet?
Didn't think so. For someone who professes to be a tantrika, such experiences 
exceeds you because you are a prisoner of your physical senses. You don't get 
to first see and then interact with bhu-mandala and its beings because you 
practice kali-pujas. 

However, I'll have to try out the practice of turning away and enlivening left 
nostril breathing to pacify the spouse. I wasn't married when I examined 
Swarúdaya the first time, so I have to give credit to these really important 
parts of the tantra teaching of this lineage.

No doubt the bitches will cower in awe.
 
 

 Well, I know I'm hiding behind the sofa as you speak. BTW, have you ever 
studied the teachings of Riddleme Thatonebat Man? Or practiced the deep 
practice of Boogiedown? Maybe you have read the works of Putcha Dasleep?

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

BTW, Mike, the mainstream media would be *thrilled* to be able to document a 
genuine Clinton scandal with actual facts. If they haven't done so this time 
around, it's because the facts just ain't there. 

 BTW 2, the mainstream media isn't all that "librul." They're centrist. And the 
Republican presidential candidates made fools of themselves accusing CNBC of 
being too liberal--CNBC is almost as right-wing as Fox News. It's a big booster 
of Wall Street; the Tea Party began on CNBC, for pete's sake. The debate 
moderators did ask a few bad questions, but most of them were substantive. 
Those were the questions the candidates really resented and did their best to 
avoid by dumping on the moderators. As far as the candidates are concerned, 
"debates" are for them to stand there and tell everybody how great they are, 
not to be examined on the issues or challenge each other's positions. 
 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 FYI, "shooting the messenger" refers to a *blameless* messenger. It isn't 
shooting the messenger to point out that he is unreliable, especially when his 
message accuses somebody of criminal acts.
 

 

 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

  Judy, you're just shooting the messenger here. However, I would agree that 
you won't find anything like this in the mainstream media, regardless of how 
factual it is. "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 


 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Krauthammer on the Clinton Foundation
 
 
   FWIW, this is from Newsmax, a very right-wing and highly unreliable "news" 
outlet. Not only that, it isn't from a Newsmax article, it's from a reader 
comment--in other words, no editorial control or fact-checking. The dude who 
wrote it has sent and posted it all over the place (do a Google search for the 
phrase "Charles Krauthammer alluded..."). The writer is illiterate ("alluded" 
is used incorrectly), but that's to be expected.
 

 

 

 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 

 
 Wednesday, October 28, 2015 Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton