Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

It's not "obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump"; the claim that it is, 
is obviously yet another cooked-up right-wing smear attempt. Disgusting. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with 
Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long 
and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state.
 

 Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and 
she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get 
this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much 
harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to.
 
As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not 
getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump.

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
 

 Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
 

 Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
 

 so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

 

 She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
 


 
 So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
 

 What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)
 





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
 

 Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
 

 In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 How many rapes?
 Juanita Brodrick
 Hmmm,. sound familiar?


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 How many does it take?
 

 How many does it take to what??
 

 And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Like I said, you're a real bottom-feeder. Disgusting. 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with 
Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long 
and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state.
 

 Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and 
she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get 
this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much 
harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to.
 
As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not 
getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump.

 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
 

 Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
 

 Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
 

 so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

 

 She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
 


 
 So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
 

 What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)
 





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
 

 Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
 

 In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 How many rapes?
 Juanita Brodrick
 Hmmm,. sound familiar?


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 How many does it take?
 

 How many does it take to what??
 

 And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
 
 As for the woman 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

There's nothing "sanitized" about what's on Snopes. The tapes and transcripts 
are the same as what's on the page you link to, and that were provided by the 
original report in the Washington Free Beacon, on which the Daily News story is 
based. Nothing new here, sorry. 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clintBon-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

 

 Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc... 
A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-... 
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009
 

SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.
 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
 

 Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
 

 Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
 

 so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

 

 She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
 


 
 So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
 

 What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)
 





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
 

 Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
 

 In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 How many rapes?
 Juanita Brodrick
 Hmmm,. sound familiar?


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

BTW, I'll stick with what I said earlier about Hillary and her rapist 
client.http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/young-hillary-clinton-heard-laughing-discussing-defense-accused-child-rapist-newly-discovered-audio-tapes-article-1.1832009

  
|  
|   
|   
|   ||

   |

  |
|  
||  
Young Hillary Clinton heard laughing while discussing her defense of an acc...
 A young Hillary Clinton callously rejoiced at getting an accused child-rapist 
off the hook even though the then-...  |   |

  |

  |

 
SNOPES gets the sanitized version to counter Hillary in her own words.


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
She screams with her lips?
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.
You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

Not particularly, no.
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much 
of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about 
Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)



   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

How many rapes?
Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar?

  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

How many does it take?
How many does it take to what??
And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have 
her day in court. At least she'll have one.
I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih 
a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be paid 
off to withdraw the suit and keep silent.


Clinton's victims had to 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Change of Leadership

[dhamiltony...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

A narrative, of what happened and how it came to be..

 #   

 The University President was turned out based on performance.  As it happened 
he brought it on himself. Essentially, he undid himself.

 In fact there was quite a lot of communal process involved in this. The 
process began within the public meetings of the Fairfield Mental Health 
Alliance [FMHA] early in the summer of 2014.  Communal processes within the 
meditating community, the University, and the TM Movement started then as 
community meetings were called for in the meditating community in the wake of a 
string of suicides by younger people of the meditating Fairfield community.   

 From that time working committees of meditators formed looking into conditions 
of mental well-being in the meditating community. This came from an initial 
call-to-meeting that went out as a memo sent around to licensed medical 
clinical professionals of the meditating community.  

 In the initial e-mail came an enumerated problem-definition proposed as a 
series of talking points to serve as a meeting agenda for a meeting of the 
group.  A meeting room was arranged for on campus.  About 60 people came to the 
first meetings.  Right away this became a larger working group and the group 
formed right away into working sub-committees.  There then came a series of 
advertised public meetings forming as the Fairfield Mental Health Alliance 
(FMHA).   Productive work continued from then in a number of areas related to 
mental health and communal well-being in meditating Fairfield, Iowa. 

 The meetings of the group were open and public.  Any interested persons who 
were willing to work on areas related to community mental health were invited 
and free to attend.  It became a matter of interested people of goodwill 
showing up and a number of people came along in the process to work on 
different areas.  A number of quite effective people came along into the 
process.  

 The weekly FMHA meetings typically were opened on time, the meetings were 
chaired and run by written agenda and consequently became very productive. 
During the mid-week sub-committee meetings were held on different areas of 
work.  Reports then given every week in the larger general meetings. Quite a 
lot practical direct work in the service of bettering communal mental health 
was accomplished in the next couple of years.

 One area of the several areas of work (eleven sub-committees working at one 
point) was a sub-committee which looked at the role of the TM movement’s 
‘culture’ in the mental well-being of the meditating community.  At a point the 
‘culture’ sub-committee of the FMHA became reconstituted in the fall of 2014 
through a strategic planning process and this ‘culture’ sub-committee has met 
weekly or more often since.  The focused work of the ‘culture’ sub-committee of 
the FMHA commenced from then. 

 From later in 2014 the ‘culture’ sub-committee set about in a process of 
research gathering ‘cases’ of how cultural features peculiar to the ™ movement 
affected people in their lives.  People working on this sub-committee then set 
out and went out collecting cases of how people’s well-being had been affected 
by cultural aspects of the ™ movement.  This work was not about collecting 
opinions but instead a collecting of particular cases about what happened to 
people by record of direct narrative.  A growing case file of gathered cases 
emerged in this process as a pool of ‘data’. Cases came in and gathered. As 
direct narratives, they came from all alumni groups or pools of the ™ movement. 
They came from alumni of MIU, MUM, old ™ teachers, old Governors, Re-certs, 
Purusha, Mother Divine, MSAE, University faculty, staff, and from meditators in 
the community.  

 A beauty to a process of collecting ‘case’ narratives is that as there comes 
to be enough of them they become data. Data that can relate to particular 
policy initiatives that could be taken to improve aspects of the cultural life 
of the ™ movement.  

 Cases often grouped as data clusters and subsequently this allowed for the 
generation of white papers which sought to clarify ways of thinking about 
cultural features peculiar to the meditating movement relating to communal 
well-being which could then be addressed by organizational policy of the 
University and the TM movement at large.  This work patiently continued in 
cycle based on cases as data, not just by opinion about what was wrong in 
policy or particular personnel but by case narratives of circumstance.  
Evidently a lot of the problematic areas only needed some calm leadership to 
acknowledge and attend to them for remedy of circumstance.  
  
 In an ongoing process from the collected cases then white papers were 
circulated to people who likely were in positions and able to start to make 
changes in University or TM movement policy and practices.  The sub-committee 
white papers provided ways of thinking and a cover in sequence to a number 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Look at what has happened to the other women that have had to put up with 
Clinton's unwanted sexual advances. I think she felt helpless and thought long 
and hard about going up against the top law enforcement politician in the state.

Each time Hillary started in on Trump about women, Trump brought up Bill and 
she shut up. They had to get something figured out. Took them a while to get 
this crap going about raping a thirteen year old girl. Trump hits back and much 
harder, something the Clinton's aren't used to.
As I said, it's not holding water. Nobody is paying attention to it. It's not 
getting any traction. It's obviously a Clinton attempt to counter Trump.
  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 8:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
She screams with her lips?
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.
You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

Not particularly, no.
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how much 
of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story about 
Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)



   From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

How many rapes?
Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar?

  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

How many does it take?
How many does it take to what??
And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have 
her day in court. At least she'll have one.
I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih 
a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room.
 

 Actually Broaddrick wasn't "dealing with him." But she could have had him 
charged with rape if she wanted to.
 

 She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack.
 

 She screams with her lips?
 

 it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.

 You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump and alleged rape of 
thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound suspicious to you?

 

 Not particularly, no.
 

 The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall.
 

 Um, so she *didn't* back off, she came back and did it again.
 

 The idea of Trump "warning" Hillary about anything is laughable.
 

 Of course there is a lot of talk about Clinton with under aged girls in the 
Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with Mark Rich.
 

 There's always been a lot of talk about the Clintons. The question is, how 
much of it is true? Look at how badly you screwed up on the ludicrous story 
about Hillary's defense of the accused rapist.
 

 The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and possible 
future, by accusing Trump of something worse first,
 

 Oh, jeez, Mike, can you be any more ridiculous? What have they accused him of 
besides misogyny? And it's not as if his misogyny wasn't already obvious. 
Hillary's just calling attention to it.
 

 Besides which, if he believes Bill Clinton is a rapist and "one of the worst 
abusers of women" in U.S. history, why did he invite Bill and Hillary to his 
wedding and pose for a photo with them (with Bill's arm around his new wife's 
waist)?
 

 so Hillary may continue with what she originally was going to say in respects 
to Trump and women.

 

 She will if and when she thinks it's called for.
 


 
 So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.
 

 What would it look like if it were "holding water"? (What does that even mean?)
 





 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
 

 Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
 

 In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 How many rapes?
 Juanita Brodrick
 Hmmm,. sound familiar?


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 How many does it take?
 

 How many does it take to what??
 

 And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
 
 As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her 
have her day in court. At least she'll have one.
 

 I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet 
wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be 
paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent.
 

 

 

 Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim 
had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist.

 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
 

 How many have accused him of rape?
 

 And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his 
reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes 

[FairfieldLife] Post Count Sun 03-Jul-16 00:15:05 UTC

[FFL PostCount ffl.postco...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]]

Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): 07/02/16 00:00:00
End Date (UTC): 07/09/16 00:00:00
14 messages as of (UTC) 07/03/16 00:09:43

  6 Mike Dixon mdixon.6569
  5 authfriend
  1 jr_esq
  1 emptybill
  1 email4you mikemail4you
Posters: 5
Saturday Morning 00:00 UTC Rollover Times
=
Daylight Saving Time (Summer):
US Friday evening: PDT 5 PM - MDT 6 PM - CDT 7 PM - EDT 8 PM
Europe Saturday: BST 1 AM CEST 2 AM EEST 3 AM
Standard Time (Winter):
US Friday evening: PST 4 PM - MST 5 PM - CST 6 PM - EST 7 PM
Europe Saturday: GMT 12 AM CET 1 AM EET 2 AM
For more information on Time Zones: www.worldtimezone.com 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Broderick was dealing with the then Attorney General of Arkansas, William 
Jefferson Clinton, the person she accused of raping her in her own hotel room. 
She had witnesses of the aftermath, a bloodied, bruised, and swollen upper lip 
which she claims he bit in order to keep her from screaming during the attack. 
it would be nice if both took a polygraph, although Hillary says she has lost 
her confidence in them.You did notice the date of the affidavit regarding Trump 
and alleged rape of thirteen year old girl, June 18 2016? Does that sound 
suspicious to you? 
The first time Hillary attacked Trump on women, Trump slammed her back with 
Bill's exploits and warned her *never go there* and she backed off. This 
happened a couple of times as I recall. Of course there is a lot of talk about 
Clinton with under aged girls in the Bahamas at wild parties, I believe with 
Mark Rich.The Clinton's had to *inoculate* themselves from their past and 
possible future, by accusing Trump of something worse first, so Hillary may 
continue with what she originally was going to say in respects to Trump and 
women.
So far, it's not holding any water. It sounds like something the Clinton's 
would do.

   

   From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 3:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
  
    Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was.
Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

How many rapes?
Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar?

  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

How many does it take?
How many does it take to what??
And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have 
her day in court. At least she'll have one.
I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih 
a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be paid 
off to withdraw the suit and keep silent.


Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim 
had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
How many have accused him of rape?
And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his reputation. 
I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make 
that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted 
by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
Did you listen to her taped interview?
Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
She had to 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Agamas more important and prior to Vedas in hindu tradition

[emptyb...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

This is just Southern Tamil sewage asserting itself as "higher" than the Veda 
and more "pure" than anything accepted by those "northern brahmins".
 
Here is a good general description:

Agamas prescribe image worship in the place of rituals like Yajnas, mentioned 
in the Vedas. Agamas cover areas of worship inclusive of construction of the 
temples; the rules for installation and consecration of the deities; the 
methods of performing pujas in the temples; philosophy; recitation of mantras; 
worship involving figures or yantras; bhakti yoga; domestic rituals samskaras; 
rules of varnasrama-dharma and public festivals. Various Vaishnava traditions 
have different degree of adherence and various lists of texts included under 
the overall concept. The term Agama primarily means tradition; Agama represents 
the previously ordained practices generally held in regard (Agama 
loka-dharmanaam maryada purva-nirmita -Mbh 8.145.61). Agama is also that which 
helps to understand things correctly and comprehensively. Agama Shastras are 
not part of the Vedas. The Agamas do not derive their authority directly from 
the Vedas. They are Vedic in spirit and character and make use of Vedic mantras 
while performing the service. The Agama shastras are based in the belief that 
the divinity can be approached in two ways. It can be viewed as nishkala, 
formless – absolute; or as sakala having specific aspects. Nishkala is 
all-pervasive and is neither explicit nor is it visible. It is analogues, as 
the Agama texts explain, to the oil in the sesame-seed, fire in the fuel, 
butter in milk, and scent in flower. It is in human as antaryamin, the inner 
guide. It has no form and is not apprehended by sense organs, which includes 
mind. Sakala, on the other hand, is explicit energy like the fire that has 
emerged out of the fuel, oil extracted out of the seed, butter that floated to 
the surface after churning milk or like the fragrance that spreads and delights 
all. That energy can manifest itself in different forms and humans can approach 
those forms through appropriate means. The Agamas recognize that means as the 
archa, the worship methods unique to each form of energy-manifestation or 
divinity. The Vedas do not discuss about venerating the icons; though the icons 
(prathima or prathika) were known to be in use. Their preoccupation was more 
with the nature, abstract divinities and not with their physical 
representations. The Vedas did however employ a number of symbols, such as the 
wheel, umbrella, spear, noose, foot-prints, lotus, goad and vehicles etc. These 
symbols, in the later ages, became a part of the vocabulary of the iconography. 
There are also the Agama and Tantra ways of worship of the other gods, as 
Ganesa, Surya and Skanda. The Vaishnava theology of the Agama type is 
especially propounded in treatises like the The devotion with which the seeker 
of God tries to commune himself inwardly takes the shape of outer worship in 
the beginning with its usual traditions and regulations, requiring materials of 
worship such as flowers and offerings. There are three main divisions in Agama 
shastra, the Shaiva, the Shaktha and Vaishnava. The Shaiva branch of the Agama 
deals with the worship of the deity in the form of Shiva. This branch in turn 
has given rise to Shaiva Siddantha of the South and the Prathyabijnana School 
of Kashmir Shaivisim. The Shakta Agama prescribes the rules and tantric rituals 
for worship of Shakti, Devi the divine mother. The third one, Vaishanava Agama 
adores God as Vishnu the protector. This branch has two major divisions 
Vaikhanasa and Pancharatra. The latter in turn has a sub branch called Tantra 
Sara followed mainly by the Dvaita (Dualist) sects (i.e. Madhwas). Each Agama 
consists of four parts. The first part includes the philosophical and spiritual 
knowledge. The second part covers the yoga and the mental discipline. The third 
part specifies rules for the construction of temples and for sculpting and 
carving the figures of deities for worship in the temples. The fourth part of 
the Agamas includes rules pertaining to the observances of religious rites, 
rituals, and festivals. Agama is essentially a tradition and Tantra is a 
technique; but both share the same ideology.But, Agama is wider in its scope; 
and contains aspects oh theory, discussion and speculation.The term Agama is 
used usually for the Shaiva and Vasishnava traditions and the Shakta cult is 
termed as Tantric. But, there is an element of Tantra in Agama worship too, 
particularly in Pancharatra.

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Of course. Just wanted to know who you thought the accuser was. 

 Broaddrick's accusation is hardly straightforward. After untold oodles of 
investigation, it still hasn't been confirmed; it remains he said-she said. She 
never had charges brought against Clinton, and she denied the rape rumors in an 
affidavit to Paula Jones's lawyers, although she later "told all" to NBC and 
the Wall Street Journal editorial page. So we still don't know if her story is 
true.
 

 In any case, my original point was that your claim that the suit against Trump 
makes him "doubly qualified to be president by Democratic standards" is just 
extraordinarily meanspirited nonsense. No Democratic president has ever even 
been accused of raping a 13-year-old girl.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 
 How many rapes?
 Juanita Brodrick
 Hmmm,. sound familiar?


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 How many does it take?
 

 How many does it take to what??
 

 And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
 
 As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her 
have her day in court. At least she'll have one.
 

 I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet 
wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be 
paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent.
 

 

 

 Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim 
had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist.

 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
 

 How many have accused him of rape?
 

 And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his 
reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes 
when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
 

 So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
 

 It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
 

 That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
 

 Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts 
parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
 

 Did you listen to her taped interview?

 Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
 

 Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
 

 Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
 

 Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

 

 Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
 

 She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

 

 Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
 

 Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
 

 If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Clinton raped older women and molested them.
 

 And the proof is...? 
 

 Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
 

 You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't 

[FairfieldLife] Now the Acts of Infamy Begin After Leaving Fallujah

[jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

Do the jihadists know that the planets Mars and Saturn are manipulating them to 
persecute Christians and others in the name of Allah?  In other words, they've 
lost control of their minds and conscience due to the effects of planetary 
transits.  Are they biological robots or human beings with consciousness?  At 
worst, they are biological systems possessed by the devil or Lucifer.
 

 After Fallujah, ISIS Moves to Lebanon and targets Christians | Fox News 
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/07/02/after-fallujah-isis-moves-to-lebanon-and-targets-christians.html
 
 
 
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/07/02/after-fallujah-isis-moves-to-lebanon-and-targets-christians.html
 
 
 After Fallujah, ISIS Moves to Lebanon and targets Christ... 
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/07/02/after-fallujah-isis-moves-to-lebanon-and-targets-christians.html
 The persecution Christians are facing under ISIS is unprecedented, but it also 
goes far beyond the so-called Islamic State.
 
 
 
 View on www.foxnews.com 
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/07/02/after-fallujah-isis-moves-to-lebanon-and-targets-christians.html
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 

 

 

 

 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

How many rapes?
Juanita BrodrickHmmm,. sound familiar?

  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 11:02 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

How many does it take?
How many does it take to what??
And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have 
her day in court. At least she'll have one.
I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet wih 
a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be paid 
off to withdraw the suit and keep silent.


Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim 
had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist.


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
How many have accused him of rape?
And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his reputation. 
I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make 
that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted 
by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
Did you listen to her taped interview?
Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Clinton raped older women and molested them.
And the proof is...? 
Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It
|  |
|  | |  | FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... 
Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a 
viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. |  |
| View on www.snopes.com|   Preview by Yahoo  |
|  |

  


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

If Snopes and/or PolitiFact report on this at all, the facts they cite will be 
the facts of what Lynch (and anybody else who was present) said about the 
conversation. Neither of them is in a position to report the facts of what was 
said on the plane (unless somebody slips them an audiotape). 

 If they report on this, it will only be because some crazed right-wingers 
start spreading made-up rumors about what was discussed.
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 BTW, undoubtedly Snopes and Politifact will report that there is absolutely no 
truth to anything other than grandchildren and golf being discussed between 
Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on an airplane in Phoenix for thirty minutes. 
Those are the facts because that's what Lynch said.
 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 How many does it take?
 

 How many does it take to what??
 

 And, again, how many was it? Below you refer to "the rape victim," so I gather 
there was only one who accused him of rape. Who was it?
 
 As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her 
have her day in court. At least she'll have one.
 

 I'm guessing she won't. Trump is too powerful. I just hope she doesn't meet 
wih a mysterious fatal "accident." More likely, he'll arrange for her to be 
paid off to withdraw the suit and keep silent.
 

 

 

 Clinton's victims had to deal with the powerful politicians. The rape victim 
had to deal with the attorney general of Arkansas, her rapist.

 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
 

 How many have accused him of rape?
 

 And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his 
reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes 
when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
 

 So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
 

 It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
 

 That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
 

 Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts 
parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
 

 Did you listen to her taped interview?

 Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
 

 Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
 

 Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
 

 Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

 

 Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
 

 She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

 

 Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
 

 Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
 

 If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Clinton raped older women and molested them.
 

 And the proof is...? 
 

 Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
 

 You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
 

 FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
 
 http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
 
 FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a 
viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate.


 
 View on www.snopes.com 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

BTW, undoubtedly Snopes and Politifact will report that there is absolutely no 
truth to anything other than grandchildren and golf being discussed between 
Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on an airplane in Phoenix for thirty minutes. 
Those are the facts because that's what Lynch said.


  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
How many have accused him of rape?
And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his reputation. 
I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make 
that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted 
by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
Did you listen to her taped interview?
Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Clinton raped older women and molested them.
And the proof is...? 
Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It
|  |
|  | |  | FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... 
Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a 
viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. |  |
| View on www.snopes.com|   Preview by Yahoo  |
|  |

  


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits







 
 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

How many does it take?
As for the woman accusing Trump, listen to what she has to say and let her have 
her day in court. At least she'll have one. Clinton's victims had to deal with 
the powerful politicians. The rape victim had to deal with the attorney general 
of Arkansas, her rapist.

  From: "authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" 

 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, July 2, 2016 9:11 AM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
   
    


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
How many have accused him of rape?
And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his reputation. 
I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes when they make 
that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts parroted 
by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
Did you listen to her taped interview?
Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.
  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

Clinton raped older women and molested them.
And the proof is...? 
Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It
|  |
|  | |  | FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... 
Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a 
viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate. |  |
| View on www.snopes.com|   Preview by Yahoo  |
|  |

  


  From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits







 
 Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!


  From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: 

Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

[authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 The women's stories  that accused him is good enough for me. There are way too 
many.
 

 How many have accused him of rape?
 

 And those that have made such charges, didn't  exactly give him his 
reputation. I think it was Hillary that said every woman should be believes 
when they make that charge. Except when it involves her or her interests.
 

 So we should believe the woman who is suing Trump for raping her when she was 
13 years old, right?
 

 It's one thing to believe every woman *when they make the charge*. It's quite 
another to continue to believe them when it turns out the evidence for the 
charge is flimsy or nonexistent.
 

 That story has been out  for months and I had already checked SNOPES. They 
don't exactly deny it, although they seriously massage it to make it not sound 
so bad.
 

 Translation: They present the facts, which show that it's the nonfacts 
parroted by right-wingers like you that make it sound so bad.
 

 Did you listen to her taped interview?

 Yeah, she laughed when she said the guy passed a polygraph. Made her lose all 
confidence in them she said.
 

 Which questions and answers was she referring to, specifically?
 

 Nowhere did she laugh about the outcome of the case.
 

 Got the guy a reduced sentence because some evidence had been mishandled.

 

 Did you actually read the Snopes page? The girl and her mother pressured the 
prosecutor for a plea deal to avoid the girl having to testify at trial 
(understandably). The prosecutor reduced the charge, and the judge then reduced 
the sentence.
 

 She had to do it though... as a favor. A *favor* she said in the tape. Sounds 
like one of those sniper stories.

 

 Snopes quotes the *prosecutor* as confirming that she didn't want to take the 
case when the judge appointed her and tried hard to get out of it. But she got 
stuck with it.
 

 Right-wingers like you don't believe in due process (unless they or their 
interests are on trial, of course). You don't think the lawyer for the accused 
has an ethical obligation to do his or her best for the client. You think he or 
she should flout judicial ethics and allow the accused to be convicted and 
punished without making the best possible case.
 

 If you did believe in due process, there would be no way for you to smear 
Hillary with her involvement in this case.


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 9:16 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens
 
 
   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 Clinton raped older women and molested them.
 

 And the proof is...? 
 

 Hillary also defended, successfully, a rapist of an eleven or twelve year old 
girl, that she knew was guilty... and laughed about it.
 

 You're a real bottom-feeder, aren't you? You just don't care what the facts 
are. It's more important to get your smears in than to tell the truth:
 

 FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About It 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
 
 http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
 
 FALSE: Hillary Clinton Freed Child Rapist, Laughed About... 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/ 
Hillary Clinton's role in a 40-year-old rape case became the focal point of a 
viral meme in 2016, but the claims made about it were mostly inaccurate.


 
 View on www.snopes.com 
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 
 


 From: "authfriend@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 5:34 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!
 
 


 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Plot Thickens

 
   
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits
 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/316341058/Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-Rape-Lawsuit-and-Affidavits


 















 











 
 
 


  
 
   Oh, really? And which Democratic presidents have been accused of raping 
13-year-old girls?
 

 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote :

 ROFLMAO! That should make Trump doubly qualified to be president by Democratic 
standards!
 
 


 From: "awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife]" 
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Friday, July 1, 2016 12:48 

[FairfieldLife] RUSSIAN PARLIAMENT BANS GMO CROPS

[email4you mikemail4...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]]

http://sustainablepulse.com/2016/06/25/russian-parliament-passes-total-ban-on-gmo-crops-and-animals/

 Duma has also given the Russian Government the right to prevent the import of 
products containing GMOs in to Russia, if it is revealed that a specific GMO 
has a negative impact on human health and/or the environment Russia’s 
Agriculture Minister, Alexander Tkachev, stated Friday;  ”The Ministry of 
Agriculture is strongly against GMOs, Russian products will remain clean.”