--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you leave, I'd consider it a very great loss.
Angela
Angela, I love You; You know where to find me :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@ wrote:
Jim and Rory exceeded their posting limits (Jim � 55; Rory, 56).
I�ve blocked their posting privileges and will restore them next
Tuesday night.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be misjudging this, but I'm sensing a I'm taking my football
and
going home reaction in Rory's and Jim's desire to drop out because
they
were shut down for a week. Not that it's their football, but
somehow they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Now, THAT makes sense! I remember the terrific battles that would
rage within me as I approached my enlightenment; the revealing of my
Self-- especially when I would practice TM- Transcendental
Meditation- *lol*
R: Here's the really funny part. They are so terrified of the coming
tyranny, terror, fascism, and torture out there and completely
unaware that the coming nightmare is Disneyland compared to the
absolute tyranny, terror, fascism, and torture they are subjecting
themselves to every
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the really funny part. They are so terrified of the coming
tyranny, terror, fascism, and torture out there and completely
unaware that the coming nightmare is Disneyland compared to the
absolute
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, if you want to call the rubble, bones, and stink of an
incinerated Germany Disneyland, you've got a point. But I don't think
that this is using language with any kind of precision.
I do.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AnyOne of Us who can listen...? If what I say doesn't resonate for
you, feel free to ignore it, of course.
FWIW I too am really moved by your great heart, Curtis, and I wish
you nothing but the best.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its a comparison of *behaviors* in several people
who have stepped up to the plate here on FFL and
made statements about their supposed state of
consciousness. My point was simply that one of
them has done so with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A: I understand your point about Disney Land. It's the usual
statement about it all being illusory. Nevertheless, Rory, given the
choice, what sort of life while still in the body would you choose?
Are there
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, excellent point. I've never seen MMY actually communicate with
anyone. Jim and Rory may well be enlightened, but they don't seem to
have enough self-awareness to notice how they come across. Maybe they
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or to lie to you to make you feel better, if that's what you
want
That's all I ever wanted from you Rory. You don't call you don't
write, and is it too much to ask for a box of chocolates once in a
while?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Acid Trip and Jim and Rory [since they both seem to have missed
the post]
Didn't miss it; just didn't think you really wanted to converse :-)
Reading Jim and Rory's posts reminds me of an acid trip I took
decades
snip
Nablusos: A couple of fellows are shaking their anti-TM boat where
it used
to
be so comfy. No wonder they are upset. :-)
jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately not upset enough to capsize the boat into the ocean
though...
Ha! Just what I was thinking.
I love how the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
R: Apparently we are *all* still failing miserably :-)
Yeah. Like I said, arrogant asshole. Perhaps you really think that
your being an arrogant asshole really DOES effectively liberate
people. GUFFAW!
No, not at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
But it's still only a movie, and to be bound to a nice movie is
infinitely worse -- INFINITELY worse -- than being free in a nasty
one. We can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha! Just what I was thinking.
I love how the flea sits on the elephant's rump, thinking it can
control the elephant :-)
I sense some headway being made. In this analogy I guess people
like
me are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool, thanks for responding Rory. I feel heard and I hope you do too.
I love you, man. I wasn't kidding or making a put-down when I said I
feel moved by your great heart. It's awesome.
On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:10 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
You want us all to keep quiet, to not
rock the boat?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do I?
Don't stop your klesha-dance on my behalf.
Nice ambiguity. Do you mean dance *of* the kleshas or dance
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're really cogitating that much, I'd recommend ice-packs to
the
skull and call me in the morning.
Eat meat and potatoes in heavy gravy now or on arising.
Me? No. I just liked your term klesha-dance and was open to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
If you're really cogitating that much, I'd recommend ice-packs to
the
skull and call me in the morning.
Eat meat and potatoes in heavy gravy now
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
If you're really cogitating that much, I'd recommend ice-packs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nice story.
You just said, To me, anything with words is a story. Even OM / AUM
has its story ---
and is a story. If you take your stories so serious as to believe them
to be something else, then, as you please.
If
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It should be, IMO. How you and Curtis manage the patience to wade
through their insufferably boring tracts is truly beyond me.
Sal
Go Know yourself, Sal -- and I don't mean just in the Biblical sense :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nailing someone besides yourself is fun, too, but I suspect that
hasn't happened for you
for quite some time, even though your obvious creative ability could
put someone else in
simultaneous ecstasy with you -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote:
By these exchanges I see that Davies' point is either
trivial, not clear or no point at all!
That's definitely what you'd see in what hugheshugo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am certainly not surprised that it's clear to you, Judy, as you
obviously Understand that (y)our consciousness contains it all, but I
must say I am a little surprised that another Dead guy claims that
he doesn't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse me, Dr. Pete; I mean to say, maybe you have forgotten what
the
world looks like to those who don't know they are No-one yet?
Questioning the hitherto-unquestioned assumption that there is an
external order
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When you say, actually tickled and stirred Me, don't you mean
with
a particular sensation of bliss? The reason I ask is that I find it
quite easy sometimes to put my attention on a particular individual
and feel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
You just don't understand martial arts Turq.
You have no idea of the bone shattering power, or organ collapsing
danger a Shotokan fighter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Interesting observations-- I don't really get what you mean when you
say incarnate and experience from the inside out, if need be
(which is quite seldom these days) Can you be a little bit more
specific?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice POV.
I had a *lot* of fun with it, thanks :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good.
(And the rage part was a nice touch of inspired irony.)
Nice story.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Don't try to lay your moodmaking crap on me buddy. I am not
condemning
you, or me, if you want to see it that way- just calling you on your
BS and your foolishness, your hypocrisy.
Ahh, but you see, Jim, he *is*
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
Don't try to lay your moodmaking crap on me buddy. I am not
condemning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh, but you see, Jim, he *is* condemning *you* -- trying
desperately
to find and prove flaws in you so he won't have to look up to
you as
a role model, which is what he thinks you want!
J: and I am
TomT:
From Jean Klein Transmission of the Flame page 65 snip
Understanding, being the understanding, is enlightenment
YES -- Understanding is probably a better word than Knowledge as
Now we both figuratively and literally Under-stand ourSelf, and it is
truly and simply a whole-body BEing.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand his point, he's asking why there should
be higher-order explanations of ontological facts in
the first place. (That the explanations evolve as we
learn more is beside the point.)
Or to put it another
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote a paper on this very subject while working on my Master's at
Harvard Divinity School... That was in 1980 or so, right after
constant immersion in the omnipresent gold light/angels/deities/blah-
blah-blah
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
I wrote a paper on this very subject while working on my
Master's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, nicely put (if I do say so mySelf *lol*); the omnipresent gold-
light/angels/deities/etc. would be the subjective (and by that I
mean real) equivalent of attaining lightspeed and essential
identity with the laws
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, goodie. Story time. Tell us the one again about the infinitely
radiant Pride. Ot the ones where particlees collide in this big
chamber and go boom boom! Or one about dragons. I love the ones
about dragons!
It
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
Oh, goodie. Story time. Tell us the one again about the infinitely
radiant Pride. Ot the ones where particlees collide in this big
chamber
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It occurred to me while writing my previous reply that it must
sound
like quite a foreign language to some. Nonetheless to be able to
clarify and express elements of consciousness is too precious an
opportunity to
OK, let's compare and contrast the quality of this first post:
Oh, goodie. Story time. Tell us the one again about the
infinitely
radiant Pride. Ot the ones where particlees collide in this
big
chamber and go boom boom! Or one about dragons. I love the
ones
about dragons!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually, as I recall, perhaps incorrectly, that you wished I would
never use your name again.
I replied to your post in which you had said I and others are making
claims to enlightenment, or higher states of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
FWIW, today is the start of Winter in the Rorian Taurus-Equinox
(T-
E) Calendar, when the Sun enters T-E Capricorn. This is the month
of
the Indigo Mason, or Crone: Kali, Cailleach, Loki -- Saturn as
Binah
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Who can say? Not I. But I do regret that America wound
up so pussywhipped by fear and by the military-indus-
trial complex for 60 years that they couldn't afford
to provide the decent standard of living for its
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remain open to the claim from some folks that they
no longer perceive a difference between shit and
shinola -- both are just particles of their Self.
It's possible, and more power to 'em if they really do
perceive
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
FWIW, today is the start of Winter in the Rorian Taurus-
Equinox
(T-
E
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
I remain open to the claim from some folks that they
no longer perceive a difference between shit and
shinola -- both are just particles
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean are in
someway different though, and that's not true.
More accurate would be that old analogy of the ocean's depths and the
minute vibration of its surface
R: This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean are
in
someway different though, and that's not true.
do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank God you cleared that up!!! Now I can sleep peacefully tonight.
*lol* Saving the worldone particle at a time!
(DISCLAIMER to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can pretend anything you like, crusty or not, as always :-)
Since nothing means anything, I'm sure you wont object to my taking
the role of being rooted in absolute reality and you just
pretending.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
R: This simile still implies that the oil-slick and the ocean
are
in
someway different though, and that's not true.
That well
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Self prior to all distinction? Doesn't that necessarily turn out to
be a verbal quibble?
Not IME, no.
To know itself as Self, doesn't it have to posit a non-self?
The memory of non-self remains, by which
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
mailander111@ wrote:
Self prior to all distinction? Doesn't that necessarily turn out
to
be a verbal quibble?
Not IME, no.
To know itself as Self
FWIW, today is the start of Winter in the Rorian Taurus-Equinox (T-
E) Calendar, when the Sun enters T-E Capricorn. This is the month of
the Indigo Mason, or Crone: Kali, Cailleach, Loki -- Saturn as Binah
the Sterile Mother -- she is the Critic, the Stonecutter, chipping
away all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you forgot the part where they just aren't
evolved enough to understand you. But they will be
someday, by which time you'll have evolved to ZC
and still be superior to them.
Not IME. Death is the great
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
I think you forgot the part where they just aren't
evolved enough
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm like MMY, the Divine plan changes based on my
ADHD!!
ADHD + Alzheimer's = Line on Air.
Happy Birthday what were we just talking about?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, george_deforest
george.deforest@ wrote:
I know I am being opposed. I am prepared to take and swallow
and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fascinating, this historic scapegoating of Jews amazes me. When did
it start? was it really all because the elders of Jerusalem demanded
Christ be sacrificed?
Joseph Atwill's Caesar's Messiah provides the most
R: Wow. You're RIGHT!
:-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, You are wrong!
Hahahahaha. Wait a minute. Which one is You, again? I am like so
confused.
Anyway, as I think I was saying before I so rudely interrupted myself,
Happy Birthday to Me.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007, at 11:30 AM, hugheshugo wrote:
I honestly don't think it's likely or, knowing the people I hang out
with, even possible in the TMO. I think everyone would walk away
sadly shaking their heads if
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
snip Certainly a large percentage
of the experiences claimed as enlightenment
by Jim and Rory fall into the category of just
some overwhelming
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 no_reply@
wrote:
I haven't slept in meditation for 25 years. As usual Vaj is talking
about something he has no knowledge. In other words a fraud.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
snip Certainly a large percentage
of the experiences claimed as enlightenment
by Jim and Rory fall into the category of just
some overwhelming
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@
wrote:
[snip]
snip Certainly a large percentage
of the experiences claimed
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Possibly what Turq mistakes as the emotion of enlightenment-like
experiences is the more immediate emotion expressed as a result of
living Here and Now. Like when you stub your toe, cut your finger
or
bang your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
Yes, exactly. Valuing Hours long samadhi is still just
clinging to another experience...
I don't care what you two clowns argue about
to defend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo
richardhughes103@ wrote:
I have reached a conclusion on the Hitler conspiracies, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Funny, but in between 'communicating' with 'you' I watched this clip:
Doctor Who - Time Crash [he meets himself]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtIXg7MzPUY
*lol* Brilliant! That's us, all right :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@
wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
wrote
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually it would still possess meaning with or without a direct
experience of the absolute. What's important to get is just
because
someone tells you something represents the absolute does not mean it
is the absolute.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Rory Goff wrote:
From here, arguing about meaning and distorted traditions or
attaching any meaning to any tradition is completely laughable:
In this context, tradition means practical
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007, at 11:19 AM, Rory Goff wrote:
And you're still misusing it's too.
I've always been possessive of my pronouns.
It's a false possession: a misunderstanding to mistake a possession for
a contraction
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a false possession: a misunderstanding to mistake a possession
for
a contraction.
And equally, as in your case, to mistake a contraction for a possession.
Not unlike one's attachment to tradition.
R: In THIS context, any tradition, even a practical one is
baloney. We
don't die by acquiring more and more, we die by ourselves, naked and
Alone.
Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about you, but I plan on dying with my clothes ON
(unless of course I happen to be in the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As we see from this world's great religions, lifetimes can be
spent deciding what to wear, what color, drape of fabric, what
shoes
to put on, how to step, in what order progress will be made, what
to
think, how
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
matrixmonitor@ wrote:
---I don't get it. In reply to the statement that if people
waste
their lives watching the NFL and drinking beer, Rory said This
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Here here.
(that means 'good point' in pompous british speak)
Actually, I think it's hear, hear, if one wishes to be truly
pompous :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then you failed in your job. You should have been taking a bunch of
us to Valhalla.
Only when we're truly dead.
Many of us appear to be resisting that.
It's only natural to see Death as the ultimate Demon to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alles ist in ordnung.
You see, already changes in titles has caused Rory to
confuse this thread with the Germany invincibility
thread!
You're right. Things are still *far* too confusing and out of kontrolle.
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
n Nov 18, 2007, at 11:43 AM, ffl_topic_heading_editor wrote:
Give the process several weeks. If it is not useful, it can be
abandoned.
After this initial resettting of topic headings, I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In answer to feste37 (see below), I'd like to ask, what if Marshy
really is enlightened and is laughing his fool head off like Vaj and
Curtisdeltablues and me? What if Marshy is rolling around on the floor
with
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I like that analogy-- it works. After working with my mind to
refine, refine, refine, and discriminate, the most difficult thing
to get for me was the letting go, into enlightenment. It occurred
because I had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
(P.S. It looks as though you've apparently chosen yet again
to ignore the main point of the post: the distinction between
sattva and purusha, or judging it's a really, really *good*
movie vs. actually freeing oneself
Thank you, but please remove my name from the list, Duve; I look
forward if anything to making fewer, not more posts :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Three folks now have voted.
Next to the names are the number of votes received.
Angela 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's more than a premise IMO. Hang around enough saints and you
begin
to recognize a spontaneous quality that can only be termed virtues
or virtuous. It's the Natural Condition. Co-emergent with that
recognition is our
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
It's more than a premise IMO. Hang around enough saints and you
begin
to recognize a spontaneous quality
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
Speaking of editing, perhaps you missed the editor's gentle hint the
first time around: the possessive of it is its -- not it's,
which is only used by the literate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As to your statement, Vaj, Yes and my understanding (perhaps not of
publishing genre) was that it's ok per casual anglais, Judy would
like to tell you (and I heartily agree) that it's not OK no matter
how casual your anglais,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip... the distinction between sattva and
purusha, or judging it's a really, really *good* movie vs. actually
freeing oneself from belief in the movie. While I enjoy sattvic
behavior as much as the next guy, judging
1 - 100 of 1443 matches
Mail list logo
