--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
Jim, here's some more fodder for you -- on the Dalai Lama
Tibetan
Buddhism's secret agenda for world domination :-)
http://www.iivs.de
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Of course my intent in all this is more to provide a tour
of some of the prominent glass houses here in our FFL
neighborhood. :-)
R: *lol* Mine is rather similar -- to point out that what we see is
what
we BE;
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, llundrub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why do you have to be such a fucking idiot?
Why ask why? At this moment I am apparently a fucking idiot. What
IS, IS :-)
Leave Tibetan Buddhism alone.
You are missing the point, I think. MMY, the TMO, Tibetan
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thank you for this- I am familiar with all of the experiential
dynamics you are describing here, but still don't get the context of
the devata-particles. Are they beings that become visible within the
localized
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
Thank you for this- I am familiar with all of the experiential
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In the Age of Enlightenment we won't have anuses nor
will we have genitals.
Yes, of late there's been some massive denial around the Wholeness
or holiness of the genitals and anus. It's interesting to note this
correlates
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know I love you Rory. I'm just glad to have you back.
lurk
Aww, thanks, lurk. I love all of you guys too. I never left, actually -
- just wasn't moved to write for awhile :-)
To subscribe, send a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Rory- Thanks for this- it is always helpful to get some
independent validation of one's experiences and I appreciate you
sharing this. I had written what I did regarding a bhakti-ish path
also because I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every thought is pure, pristine awareness. Accepting OR rejecting
thought (as addiction) is still being caught in the dualism of
accepting or rejecting. The Five Original Transmissions of
Vairochana, a text on Unity
And I'd like to emphasize that all of this looks way more
complicated than it actually Is. None of this implies we actually
have to do anything -- this is more a(n attempt at a) description
of what Is, than a prescription of what to Do...
:-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I think in some senses it's actually the
reverse.
The addiction aspect is secondary; what's
important is the self-medication aspect,
whether with substances or with a particular
type of activity. One may or may not
Thanks, Jim, this is most interesting! I had just finished reading
in Swami Vishnu Devananda's Meditation and Mantras (which also
includes a nice translation of Patanjali's YS) that each of the
paths had its specific strengths and weaknesses. If I remember
correctly he said the bhaktas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
And I'd like to emphasize that all of this looks way more
complicated than it actually Is.
None of this implies we actually
have
--- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TorquiseB writes: Snipped
When you come into contact with the teacher's aura, the
part of you that *already* has access to these different
states of mind *recognizes* them in the teacher's aura.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For that matter, could *all* forms of addiction
be a way to preserve the illusion of self, and
keep selflessness at bay? snip
I'd agree with this. The Dark Night's hell appears to be the pain
of the withdrawal from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Its an equally delightfully odd phenomenon that even as we
recognize
that the OneMind of the Teacher is literally our own mind, we feel
compelled to overwhelmingly surrender to a Maharishi Mahesh Yogi or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
PS Your reflections are unusually easy for me to riff off of, Rory
(Ha-Ha!)-- I've been noticing something that may be related,
having
to do with noticing subtle fears and their subsequent resolution
even
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I take refuge, I always take refuge in the Unification of All
My
Masters. How could it be any other way?
Thanks!
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I have asked before, if a nervous system is not necessary to
REFLECT or experience Being/Pure Consciousness,
does a rock experience Pure Consciousness?
Yes, a rock experiences Pure Consciousness, and a peculiarly
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tes, I never in a million years would've imagined this *other side*
of Enlightenment, rediscovering boundaries within Wholeness,
composed of Wholeness itself, Infinity rediscovering Itself to be
yet more Infinite.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
NM: So your wholeness is on yet complete. Not the BHoC which
to me is
Brahman. So we use terms differently. No foul, no penalty
NM: So your wholeness is on yet complete. Not the BHoC which to me is
Brahman. So we use terms differently. No foul, no penalty. But
possibly it would be good if we define our terms when used in
non-standard ways. :)
This reminded me -- in the past I believe you have averred that MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rory:
Would you be able to share some here on the course and what's
been
said?
When I was attending, a very large number of course participants
were describing Unity and at least some of the paradoxical qualities
of
Hi, Akasha! Apologies for the delay in responding to this. I set it
aside to give it the thought it deserved :-)
NM: For me, your posts have always had a Theosophy Society flavor --
I
presume thats your path of integrating your past studies and models
with presentness. Experientially, I have
HA! Good one, Akasha. I especially liked the including for the
first time, the genitals. Quite true! Long live Me! :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Be sure to send copies to Maharishi, the Rajas, Bevan and John, as
I
am sure they will thrill
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I always loved that metaphor, which comes from ancient collections
of
sayings preserved in the Sutras of Nyaya, the dehlidipa
(dehalIdIpa ?), the light of the threshold which illuminates two-
things-at-once.
R: Very
Very nice! Many thanks, Vaj.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mechanics of Dark Night are a long and old tradition in both
the
Buddhist and Hindu tantras which is hidden, encoded in the
Twilight
Language through various poetic metaphors, most
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My experience is that the maternal/paternal nature of the velvety
blackness comes about once the particles are fully known in their
entirety in memory (and not some bastardized concept of them
arising
from an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablus108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In a discussion in Boppard, 1982, I believe Maharishi touched upon
this theme for the first time saying that to be established in
Brahman, all of Nature must be lived.
All that which is Light and all that which is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rory,
I have been reading your posts with considerable interest. I don't
know if you have any desire to communicate with a person who is
unenlightened (and loves it) but if you care to respond, I would
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ha-Ha! Exactly, the acceptance of the attention-flow, or not,
alters
the perceived qualities of the permanently embedded particles of
God, which don't in themselves change; as greater and greater
acceptance or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rory, thanks for the reports! They're great fun to
read and have that subtle impact on consciousness
deep, deep down.
-Peter
My pleasure, Peter! It has been a privilege to know you. Our different
perspectives on your
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That, in TMO terminology, the above appears to be a GC type grook.
R: Yes; that's what I am saying. GC from the POV of the particle; KC
from the unqualified Us.
NM: In
my terminolgy and experiece, that the flatness
,
Vaj
On Oct 10, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
With deepest gratitude to MMY and Guru Dev, we wish to correct
some
Understandings of Brahman we gave here last year. Within the 27
Nakshatra-states, the middle third or 9 central ones are those of
Brahma(n), or Light
Thank you both!
Yes, vashti, you are absolutely correct -- I am supremely happy, in
an ordinary sort of way. Home is where the heart is, all right :-)
And as it happens, OMG/Akasha/Newmorning(samechit?) is also
absolutely correct. When collapsing into the particle-mes I did a
*lot* of
Yes, I don't do pujas to MMY, as I am not a teacher, and I still
affirm he is my Guru Dev, as he is my living fount of divine
holiness. What does one's Guru Dev do but show you one's own
divinity, one's own Self? How does S/He do this but by showing one
how to back up or relax into Him, into
Well, it took me almost 24 years before I had processed enough of
my stories and concomitant wounds to partake again with an open
heart, and though I may well be denser than many, it wouldn't surprise
me if many are still enjoying their various lilas apart --
With deepest gratitude to MMY and Guru Dev, we wish to correct some
Understandings of Brahman we gave here last year. Within the 27
Nakshatra-states, the middle third or 9 central ones are those of
Brahma(n), or Light, or Consciousness:
Brahma-Shiva-Shiva (B-S-S) or Mahaturiya
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rory,
I understand you are participating in the current dome course. Have
you taken the opportunity to share your experiential insights, below,
with Maharishi? What were his comments?
If you have not shared
HO'OPONOPONO
by Joe Vitale
Two years ago, I heard about a therapist in Hawaii
who cured a
complete ward of criminally insane patients--without
ever seeing any
of them. The psychologist would study an inmate's
chart and then look
within himself to see how he created that person's
illness. As he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm sure there's a huge difference, and for those to
whom it's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Truth is where you find it, I guess.
Agreed! :-) :-) :-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm sure there's a huge difference, and for those to
whom it's important to engage in such discussions at
the most profound levels, no doubt
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory, I'll bet you a buck you can't express what
you want to say here without resorting to the use
of terms implying intentionality, conscious choice
(deciding, making, denying, believing).
Quite right; enlightenment
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Attempt at translation (version 0.0.1):
the body (kaayaH) [is], well, the body (shariiram)
that consists of the five elements (paañca-bhautikam).
Performing (vidhaaya) sanyama (saMyamaM) on its (tasya)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rory, I'll bet you a buck you can't express what
you want
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, uurNa-naabha (spider) literally means
(having)wool (on the) navel ...
Ha! Most interesting! Many thanks, card; I never saw before how my
own process of ascension was so clearly prefigured in the YS :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Makes sense to me. Interesting how our gross senses tell us that
we
are separate beings, yet what *feels* true, and leads to more and
more knowledge; infinite expansion as far as I can tell, is that
we
are all
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just curious. Some folks do chant from memory. I have always
thought would be nice.
Yes, I believe it will be :-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast access to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you chant all 1008 names from memory
*lol* I haven't even finished chanting them all *from the book* yet!
Nor is memorizing them partiularly high on my to-do list. I chant
about 20-30 a night before going to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can you chant all 1008 names from memory
*lol* I haven't even finished chanting them all *from the book* yet!
Nor is memorizing them
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108
[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Never would've guessed ;)
*lol*
Possibly related to cosmic justice and
government?
Could be; I don't recall his mentioning such though. He did say at
first I was from kinnara-loka (realm of celestial
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You certainly cognize it well enough; cosmic levels of energy n'
stuff. Possibly like my apparent ability to design musical stuff but
have little interest in actually playing it.
Off and away, to play, and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
Off and away, to play, and play, and play! Ooops! Damn, just
gave
away the ultra top secret of life...
Yes, all those strata
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Rory! I really enjoyed reading this post, as I do many of
yours. I just enjoy reading the clarity that is manifest, like
looking into the future, albeit through the differential lens of
your perspective.
Hey Jim!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Mahesh's full Age of Enlightenment technique, he actually
attributes the seven lokas (and their mantras) to different parts of
the body--satya loka being the crown of the head--future consciousness.
Below the muladhara
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snippus magnus
...and again, Servant, Ruler, and Elohim are
essentially the same...snip
Or more accurately, the One who higher than the Elohim, is also the
One who is lower than the Servants, and the One who is the Ruler
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snippus giganticus *lol* That's what I (and I suspect many
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The world where the human species live is formed by four spheres
called Bhur, Bhuvar, Svar and Mahar. Bhur is the earth, Bhuvar the
atmosphere, Svar the planetary world and Mahar an extraplanetary
world, perhaps the one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My current understanding -- open to revision --snip
*lol* Here's a possible revision already, mapped onto 9 chakras:
Bhur-loka (between crown-chakra of next-lower Being and feet chakra
of this Being) is the physical
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, I think you are on to something here. My attunement these days
is definitely, and perhaps always has been in the visible light to
ultraviolet spectrum. Love that ultraviolet!!!
Here's some more on the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
These 'pyramid people' present an interesting challenge to our
attachments and boundaries. If we look within ourselves,
particularly in waking state, who of us would not want to cease
struggling, cease dealing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, I think you are on to something here. My
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, my take on this also. However, I believe the clue in all of
this to be Vaj's statement that the 'pyramid people' are seen when
one *begins* to transcend duality. And that some would seek
enlightenment as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Your Wholeness apparently doesn't allow anger and humorlessness --
does that perhaps make anger and humorlessness more powerful than
Wholeness, capable of overshadowing Wholeness?
It's a fascinating thing -- one
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What is a pureland?
Any found in Australia?
Around the Mediterranean?
They are everywhere. I know there have been practices found
among the Aborigines of Australia which are the same as
practices
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard that the Native Americans used to consider Fairfield a
sacred
spot, and would come from great distances for gatherings here.
We still do :-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 10/23/05 1:24 PM, Rory Goff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Siddhapur, Fairfield, Iowa -- where every day is a kumbha-mela :-)
Yeah. Local ordinances allow naked, ash-covered Sadhus to wander
around
town. It's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 10/23/05 3:27 PM, Rory Goff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 10/23/05 1:24 PM, Rory Goff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Siddhapur
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still shaking with heavy movements 35 years after the heavy rounding
TTCs? Wow. Lots of neck snaps, left and right, I suppose too. Where
is
Dr. Elliot and his thorizen?
I bet that's intended as another joke, right? :-D
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Oct 22, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Rory Goff wrote:
The traditional translation of
Phalguni as red one does not make a lot of sense to me. I am
tempted
to see Phal- as fruit and -Guni as guna, action
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The pairs Purna Phalguni (former red one (?), delta Leonis) and
Uttara Phalguni (latter red one (?), beta Leonis, Denebola) now
align with the two halves of Transcendence (Transcendence-I, Purna
Phalguni, state
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The pairs Purna Phalguni (former red one (?), delta Leonis)
and
Uttara Phalguni (latter red one (?), beta Leonis, Denebola)
now
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
The pairs Purna Phalguni (former red one (?), delta
.
[718,2] ; N. of a place of pilgrimage BhP.
On Oct 22, 2005, at 8:55 AM, Rory Goff wrote:
The traditional translation of
Phalguni as red one does not make a lot of sense to me. I am
tempted
to see Phal- as fruit and -Guni as guna, action
Yahoo! Groups
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Many thanks, Vaj. I also really like the definition below
of weak,
etc., as I have just now been playing with the possibilities that
the 3 Vishnu-Vishnu subgunas (Conception, pre-natal sleep, pre-
natal
dream
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
He,he,he, Hey Tom, someone's gonna be surprised,
aren't they?
Don't be foolish. Nobody is going to be surprised.
Online Etymology
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
From these definitions it looks pretty clear that somebody is
indeed
going to be taken unawares, overtaken, grasped, and seized -- by
Nobody :-)
Whereupon since Nobody has Nothing better to do, Nobody decides
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
From these definitions it looks pretty clear that somebody is
indeed
going to be taken unawares, overtaken, grasped, and seized
sparaig wrote:
Or not. My interpretation of witnessing is rather different than
many people's here.
Rory Goff wrote:
I am talking about the *death* of witnessing; what about you?
:-)
sparaig wrote:
No idea...
You have no idea how your interpretation of witnessing differs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am thinking perhaps not exactly, unless by interpretation of
witnessing he means witnessing is irrelevant :-)
Or unless we use witnessing to mean a specific distancing technique
to separate ourselves quickly from
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am thinking perhaps not exactly, unless by interpretation of
witnessing he means witnessing is irrelevant :-)
Or unless we use witnessing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know. I got your joke. I was following up on it. It seems Rory is
the only one outside the humor loop.
I did see the obvious surface implications of no idea; I was just
trying to go a little deeper into Sparaig's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know. I got your joke. I was following up on it. It seems Rory is
the only one outside the humor loop. Funny, I always figured Brahman
had a good sense of humor. I mean look at that maya thing.
Your Wholeness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, matrixmonitor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---That's obvious. At any time before or after Enlightenment, take
the
Bodhisattva vow to help others, in any type of body appropriate for
the
task. Do this for a couple of trillion mayayugas for an evaluation;
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is consciousness independent of the physical body?
There are a couple of ways to define consciousness; my current
understanding of it is as not-Self, and merely one of the three gunas
(along with love and bliss, or matter
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is consciousness independent of the physical body?
There are a couple of ways to define consciousness;
snip
A couple of ways -- what a laugh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is consciousness independent of the physical body
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
We are one, we are many; we are a countless multitude of ourselves,
showing ourselves ever-differing combinations of ourselves in the
permutations of love, consciousness and bliss -- like dipping our
fingers
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ah, paradox twice again rears its mirrored head!
The true nature of Self is infinite, formless, undifferentiated.
Yet, to be aware of it requires consciousness of its Self.
Attention
on the Infinite is pure
A couple of ways -- what a laugh! There are
countless ways for
consciousness to define itself :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
17 at last count, I believe.
Seems more like googolplexes -- but perhaps we are defining defining
in different ways --
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 20, 2005, at 10:56 AM, akasha_108 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There is typically a menu of ritual services with
prices and Hindus with money pay routinely for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Either that - or someone kept count on your enlightened
ramblings.. :-)
*LOL* And they only found 17? One of us is slipping :-)
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Get fast
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, purushaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---Thanks, Rory, interesting!. Question: Where does YHVH (YAHWEH)
fit into all of this? Thanks again.
Nice question, many thanks, purushaz! Here's how I understand it at
the moment: Within the pivotal 13-state
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip although again, none of this will probably be viewable upon
first
conscious immersion in and as Brahman -- for one thing, when first
comprehending the speed of light, the light itself appears to
disappear (Dark
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
So as we see it at this point anyhow, all of this is a part of
Brahma-
loka, specifically in what we might call Mahar-loka, corresponding
to
details of the Solar Plexus and the Full Moon Nakshatra and
Brahman
401 - 500 of 1443 matches
Mail list logo
