--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 6/5/06 3:31 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted here many
times.
But there's nothing -- absolutely no reason -- for participants on
a
OK, just to irritate Shemp, and possible Vaj, Bhariru, Unc and who
knows who else (hey a 4-shot is pretty good) here is another article.
Warning!!! Warning
The above was intented humor and does NOT endorse irritating people.
Warning!!! Warning
On Sexual Tantra and Pot. Now we just
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 6/5/06 3:31 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted here many
times.
But there's nothing -- absolutely no reason -- for participants on
a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 6/5/06 3:31 PM, shempmcgurk at shempmcgurk@ wrote:
I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted here
many
times.
In a message dated 6/5/06 4:50:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on 6/5/06 3:31 PM, shempmcgurk at shempmcgurk@ wrote:
I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted
here many times.
But there's nothing -- absolutely no reason -- for
I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted here
many
times.
But there's nothing -- absolutely no reason -- for
participants on
a
spiritual site to have any suggestions in their minds that
drugs
are
a good thing.
Absolutely? So it a totally
