--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > When asked whether evolution or creationism was true, M.
said "Both
> are".
>
> If you really look into the creationists you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "off_world_beings"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "off_w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Bob,
> > > To me, intelligent design theory is completely inadequate and
> > > unexplanatory and not as comprehensive as what MMY said.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > When asked whether evolution or creatio
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "markmeredith2002"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > When asked whether evolution or creationism was true, M.
said "Both
> are".
>
> If you really look into the creationists you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When asked whether evolution or creationism was true, M. said "Both
are".
If you really look into the creationists you find they have 3 main
problems with evolution:
1. E appears to invalidate certain statements of s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Bob,
> > To me, intelligent design theory is completely inadequate and
> > unexplanatory and not as comprehensive as what MMY said. I think
> > it's necessary to distinguish between reacting to behavior,
which is
>
Bob,
> To me, intelligent design theory is completely inadequate and
> unexplanatory and not as comprehensive as what MMY said. I think
> it's necessary to distinguish between reacting to behavior, which is
> what God does, and controlling everything, which intelligent design
> theorists seem
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "off_world_beings"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "off_world_beings"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What would happen if Hagelin seriou