RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Totals

2007-06-09 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of shempmcgurk
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:41 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Totals

 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 Rick, Shemp is already over 35, yet I am still getting
 requests to approve moderated posts by him.

No, you're not.

I've never made requests to approve moderated posts. I've sent 
posts after I reached my limit but I never requested that 
anyone approve them.

When you reach your limit, I put you on moderated status. Then, every time
you post something, the moderators get an email announcing that a moderated
post needs approval or rejection. I just delete those. The consensus here
seems to be that I should delete your extra posts to discourage you from
writing them. The consensus also seems to be that you are discourteous and
immature for refusing to abide by a guideline that everyone else has agreed
to. 



RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Totals

2007-05-19 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2007 9:57 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Totals

 

Doug wrote:
 Stand firm man against these Alt-meds people from elsewhere.

jstein wrote:
 ...only two of the four are from alt.m.t.
 
Maybe there should make a new rule, Judy, to go along with 
the 5-post-a-day rule. Anyone who has ever posted to Usenet 
cannot post to FL. Anyone who has posted once to A.M.T. 
cannot post to FL ever again. This would get rid of me, 
you, Rick, the two Barrys, Bob, Kirk, Card, Ken, and probably 
Lurk. That way, Doug could dialog with Jim, and Off 
could dialog with Peter, without any interference from 
the others. And that way they wouldn't have to put up with 
any of Rick's silly rules about posting limits or anything 
else, because Rick would be banned too. What do you think?

I don't recall ever posting to A.M.T., or ever even looking at it. 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Totals

2007-05-19 Thread Peter
Jesus wept.

--- Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Maybe there should make a new rule, Judy, to go
 along with 
  the 5-post-a-day rule. Anyone who has ever posted
 to Usenet 
  cannot post to FL. Anyone who has posted once to
 A.M.T. 
  cannot post to FL ever again. This would get rid
 of me, 
  you, Rick, the two Barrys, Bob, Kirk, Card, Ken,
 and probably 
  Lurk. That way, Doug could dialog with Jim, and
 Off 
  could dialog with Peter, without any interference
 from 
  the others. And that way they wouldn't have to put
 up with 
  any of Rick's silly rules about posting limits or
 anything 
  else, because Rick would be banned too. What do
 you think?
 
 Rick Archer wrote:
  I don't recall ever posting to A.M.T., or ever
 even looking 
  at it.
 
 My mistake - it was Vaj who used to post over there.
 So, I 
 guess you can stay here for a little while more. But
 I'm not 
 entirely convinced that you've never clicked on the
 A.M.T. 
 links I've posted on FL. 
 
 Maybe we should amend the rule to say that if anyone
 has ever 
 read Usenet, they should scram from FL. That would
 get rid of 
 Alex and most of the others here. That way, since
 you've never 
 read a single Usenet post, you could dialog with
 yourself on FL.
 
 Just make sure you don't click on the link below!
 
 WARNING: DO NOT CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW
 
 You might be exposed to something you can't
 tolerate, something 
 the stinkin' A.M.T.ers wrote about the Marshy and
 his TMO.
 
 Or, you could make a rule that if any FLer ever went
 over to 
 another Group on Yahoo! then their FL posting badge
 would be 
 suspended for a year. What do you think about that
 rule?
 
 Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental
 From: Vaj
 Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005
 Subject: Scholar-Meditator disputes Willytex
 http://tinyurl.com/ynm752
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



  
Shape
 Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel today!   
http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Totals

2007-05-18 Thread Sal Sunshine

On May 17, 2007, at 11:42 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


You, my friend, are an idiot who hasn't a clue
what he is talking about.


Judy's got you nailed on this Doug.  Your comment seemed pretty
clueless to me as well.


I'm beginning to think I need the English translation for nearly *all* 
of Doug's comments.Maybe it's just me, but many if not most seem to 
approach ranting stage.


Sal


RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Totals

2007-05-17 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of TurquoiseB
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:59 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Posting Totals

 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 A few people are getting a tad close to the limit, with two days 
 to go 'till we reset the count:
 
 Turq - 32
 
 Jim Flanegin - 30
 
 New Morning - 31
 
 Judy - 26
 
 No problem. Just giving you a heads up.

Not to complain or anything, but when I do a search
this morning using the Yahoo Advanced Search feature 
set to After May 11 2007, which includes the full 
day starting at midnight my time on May 12 (Friday), 
I get different totals:

It could be because I read FFL by email and sometimes Yahoo burps and sends
duplicate emails. So your counts are probably more accurate. Go by those.
I'll use my count just as a rough indicator.