To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
No, of course you wouldn't. You wouldn't recognize straightforwardness if it
bit you in the butt.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
: sharelon...@yahoo.com sharelon...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 8:58 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
Judy, my guess is a guess and I'm not equating that to objective reality.
--- In FairfieldLife
, September 17, 2013 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
You forget all the evidence of your inability to be straightforward that's in
the archives, Share. That's objective reality. I know you don't care for
reality, but that's just too darned bad
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:24 PM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
Share wrote:
Judy, not surprisingly, you and I have different definitions of straight
forward, objectivity and reality.
Right, that doesn't surprise
: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col
Leed
Share obfuscated:
Judy, I don't think your definitions are always the normal ones nor the ones
expressive of integrity.
You are mistaken.
I asked because I noticed you backpedaled, going from calling Buck a liar to a
bliss ninny.
No, I don't
once and you're
still attempting that.
From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:47 PM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck
Col Leed
Share
20 matches
Mail list logo
