RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
RE: RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
IMO you are like all bullies, Judy, a moral coward. You don't have the guts to answer me because you realize how wrong it was for you to call Buck a liar and assert that he lied. You don't have the guts to apologize to Buck, to admit that you were wrong to accuse him of lying. You backpedaled once and you're still attempting that. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:47 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed Share, I asked that you rephrase that question because it was disingenuous, yet you're repeating it almost verbatim. And of course you failed to acknowledge that you got what I said to Buck very wrong and failed to apologize for claiming I "backpedaled." You convict yourself of lack of integrity out of your own mouth while falsely accusing someone else of lack of integrity. And by no means for the first time. "Everything you post is evidence of what you are negating outwardly at the time." --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Judy, are you still saying that you think Buck lied and was a liar? Emily, what do you think? From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:08 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed Share obfuscated: Judy, I don't think your definitions are always the normal ones nor the ones expressive of integrity. You are mistaken. I asked because I noticed you backpedaled, going from calling Buck a liar to a bliss ninny. No, I don't think that's why you asked, and I know for a fact you didn't "notice" that I "backpedaled," because I did nothing of the kind. I guess you've forgotten once again that what folks say here is recorded in the archives. Here's what I actually said to Buck: "You know what you're doing, and you know it's wrong. Plus which, it makes you look like a clumsy bliss-ninny, IMHO." So this was your purported straightforward rephrasing of your disingenuous question? Really? Emily nailed it: "Everything you post is evidence of what you are negating outwardly at the time." ________________ From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:24 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed Share wrote: Judy, not surprisingly, you and I have different definitions of straight forward, objectivity and reality. Right, that doesn't surprise me at all. You have your own personal subjective definitions that allow you to misrepresent and mislead and obfuscate and quibble and confuse and be disingenuous without even the slightest twinge of conscience. My definitions are, you know, the normal definitions that most people use, especially people with integrity. But are you still saying that Buck actually lied?! That's a disingenuous question. Let's see if you can rephrase it so it's straightforward. I'm betting not. ____________________ From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:45 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed You forget all the evidence of your inability to be straightforward that's in the archives, Share. That's objective reality. I know you don't care for reality, but that's just too darned bad. I don't accuse anyone of lying unless they actually lie, you see. It's not just my opinion. Most on FFL do not lie, so those that do stand out. >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: >>> >>> >>>Judy, your repeating such things about me or anyone else for that matter, >>>does NOT make it true. These are your opinions and your lack of integrity >>>IMO, lies in how you assert them as objective reality. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: "authfriend@..." >>>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >>>Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:23 AM >>>Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>No, of course you wouldn't. You wouldn't recognize straightforwardness if it >>>bit you in the butt. >>> >>> >>> >>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>Judy, I wouldn't call what you do straight for
RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
Judy, are you still saying that you think Buck lied and was a liar? Emily, what do you think? From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1:08 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed Share obfuscated: Judy, I don't think your definitions are always the normal ones nor the ones expressive of integrity. You are mistaken. I asked because I noticed you backpedaled, going from calling Buck a liar to a bliss ninny. No, I don't think that's why you asked, and I know for a fact you didn't "notice" that I "backpedaled," because I did nothing of the kind. I guess you've forgotten once again that what folks say here is recorded in the archives. Here's what I actually said to Buck: "You know what you're doing, and you know it's wrong. Plus which, it makes you look like a clumsy bliss-ninny, IMHO." So this was your purported straightforward rephrasing of your disingenuous question? Really? Emily nailed it: "Everything you post is evidence of what you are negating outwardly at the time." From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:24 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed Share wrote: Judy, not surprisingly, you and I have different definitions of straight forward, objectivity and reality. Right, that doesn't surprise me at all. You have your own personal subjective definitions that allow you to misrepresent and mislead and obfuscate and quibble and confuse and be disingenuous without even the slightest twinge of conscience. My definitions are, you know, the normal definitions that most people use, especially people with integrity. But are you still saying that Buck actually lied?! That's a disingenuous question. Let's see if you can rephrase it so it's straightforward. I'm betting not. ____________ From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:45 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed You forget all the evidence of your inability to be straightforward that's in the archives, Share. That's objective reality. I know you don't care for reality, but that's just too darned bad. I don't accuse anyone of lying unless they actually lie, you see. It's not just my opinion. Most on FFL do not lie, so those that do stand out. >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: >> >> >>Judy, your repeating such things about me or anyone else for that matter, >>does NOT make it true. These are your opinions and your lack of integrity >>IMO, lies in how you assert them as objective reality. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: "authfriend@..." >>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >>Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:23 AM >>Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed >> >> >> >> >>No, of course you wouldn't. You wouldn't recognize straightforwardness if it >>bit you in the butt. >> >> >> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: >>> >>> >>>Judy, I wouldn't call what you do straight forward at all. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: "authfriend@..." >>>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >>>Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:18 AM >>>Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>You shouldn't talk, lady. At least whatever it is I do is straightforward. >>> >>> >>> >>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>Maybe it's just another case of the classroom bully. >>>> >>>>Share Long: >>>> >>>>> Exactly Jason! Buck was simply being playful. It's clear to me he wasn't >>>>> lying because it was not his intention to deceive. Nor was he blaspheming >>>>> as Xeno suggested. Maybe Xeno was being playful too? Anyway, Buck wasn't >>>>> even being a bliss ninny. If anybody thinks somebody on FFL is a bliss >>>>> ninny, that anybody really needs to come to FF and see what a real bliss
RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
Re: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
Judy, I don't think your definitions are always the normal ones nor the ones expressive of integrity. I asked because I noticed you backpedaled, going from calling Buck a liar to a bliss ninny. From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:24 PM Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed Share wrote: Judy, not surprisingly, you and I have different definitions of straight forward, objectivity and reality. Right, that doesn't surprise me at all. You have your own personal subjective definitions that allow you to misrepresent and mislead and obfuscate and quibble and confuse and be disingenuous without even the slightest twinge of conscience. My definitions are, you know, the normal definitions that most people use, especially people with integrity. But are you still saying that Buck actually lied?! That's a disingenuous question. Let's see if you can rephrase it so it's straightforward. I'm betting not. From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:45 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed You forget all the evidence of your inability to be straightforward that's in the archives, Share. That's objective reality. I know you don't care for reality, but that's just too darned bad. I don't accuse anyone of lying unless they actually lie, you see. It's not just my opinion. Most on FFL do not lie, so those that do stand out. >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: > > >Judy, your repeating such things about me or anyone else for that matter, does >NOT make it true. These are your opinions and your lack of integrity IMO, lies >in how you assert them as objective reality. > > > > > > > > From: "authfriend@..." >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:23 AM >Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed > > > > >No, of course you wouldn't. You wouldn't recognize straightforwardness if it >bit you in the butt. > > > >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: >> >> >>Judy, I wouldn't call what you do straight forward at all. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: "authfriend@..." >>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >>Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:18 AM >>Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed >> >> >> >> >>You shouldn't talk, lady. At least whatever it is I do is straightforward. >> >> >> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: >>> >>> >>>Maybe it's just another case of the classroom bully. >>> >>>Share Long: >>> >>>> Exactly Jason! Buck was simply being playful. It's clear to me he wasn't >>>> lying because it was not his intention to deceive. Nor was he blaspheming >>>> as Xeno suggested. Maybe Xeno was being playful too? Anyway, Buck wasn't >>>> even being a bliss ninny. If anybody thinks somebody on FFL is a bliss >>>> ninny, that anybody really needs to come to FF and see what a real bliss >>>> ninny is like! I stand with Buck and Col Leed. Sgt. Share >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: Jason >>>>> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:06 AM >>>>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>  >>>>> >>>>> I don't understand this authbabe. >>>>> >>>>> Just because the Colonel liked it, doesn't have anything to >>>>> do with integrity. It's just Buck's playful twist on it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --- "authfriend" wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > You like that he wrote something about the Unified Field >>>>> > and pretended it came from the Bible? >>>>> > >>>>> > Such integrity. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > --- "leedwilliam" wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > NICE, going Buck am with U in all >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > dhamiltony2k5@ writes: >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > In National unity of empathy and with great concern >>>>> > > > for the dead >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > and their communities of families and friends, >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > by the best of science >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > I should like to see a National Day of meditation >>>>> > > > called >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > for by the White House as a National coming together >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > in a Unified Field. >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > -Buck >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > For, >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > "Where two or three are gathered in effective >>>>> > > > transcending meditation there the Unified Field will >>>>> > > > be found multiplied in effect" -Matthew 18:20 >>>>> > > > >>>>> >> >> > >
Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
Judy, not surprisingly, you and I have different definitions of straight forward, objectivity and reality. But are you still saying that Buck actually lied?! From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:45 AM Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed You forget all the evidence of your inability to be straightforward that's in the archives, Share. That's objective reality. I know you don't care for reality, but that's just too darned bad. I don't accuse anyone of lying unless they actually lie, you see. It's not just my opinion. Most on FFL do not lie, so those that do stand out. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Judy, your repeating such things about me or anyone else for that matter, does NOT make it true. These are your opinions and your lack of integrity IMO, lies in how you assert them as objective reality. From: "authfriend@..." To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:23 AM Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed No, of course you wouldn't. You wouldn't recognize straightforwardness if it bit you in the butt. >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: > > >Judy, I wouldn't call what you do straight forward at all. > > > > > > > > From: "authfriend@..." >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:18 AM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed > > > > >You shouldn't talk, lady. At least whatever it is I do is straightforward. > > > >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: >> >> >>Maybe it's just another case of the classroom bully. >> >>Share Long: >> >>> Exactly Jason! Buck was simply being playful. It's clear to me he wasn't >>> lying because it was not his intention to deceive. Nor was he blaspheming >>> as Xeno suggested. Maybe Xeno was being playful too? Anyway, Buck wasn't >>> even being a bliss ninny. If anybody thinks somebody on FFL is a bliss >>> ninny, that anybody really needs to come to FF and see what a real bliss >>> ninny is like! I stand with Buck and Col Leed. Sgt. Share >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Jason >>>> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 9:06 AM >>>> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>  >>>> >>>> I don't understand this authbabe. >>>> >>>> Just because the Colonel liked it, doesn't have anything to >>>> do with integrity. It's just Buck's playful twist on it. >>>> >>>> >>>> --- "authfriend" wrote: >>>> > >>>> > You like that he wrote something about the Unified Field >>>> > and pretended it came from the Bible? >>>> > >>>> > Such integrity. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > --- "leedwilliam" wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > > NICE, going Buck am with U in all >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > > dhamiltony2k5@ writes: >>>> > > > >>>> > > > In National unity of empathy and with great concern >>>> > > > for the dead >>>> > > > >>>> > > > and their communities of families and friends, >>>> > > > >>>> > > > by the best of science >>>> > > > >>>> > > > I should like to see a National Day of meditation >>>> > > > called >>>> > > > >>>> > > > for by the White House as a National coming together >>>> > > > >>>> > > > in a Unified Field. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > -Buck >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > For, >>>> > > > >>>> > > > "Where two or three are gathered in effective >>>> > > > transcending meditation there the Unified Field will >>>> > > > be found multiplied in effect" -Matthew 18:20 >>>> > > > >>>> > >
Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed
Share, what I love about you is that everything you post is evidence of what you are negating outwardly at the time. Here, turn your sidestepping into a positive and learn this hip hop dance step. Smile. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qMj9NHsBVo From: "sharelon...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 8:58 AM Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed Judy, my guess is a guess and I'm not equating that to objective reality. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: And you figure your "guess" is objective reality? >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: > > >My guess is that just about all FFL posters realized that Buck was playing as >he does sometimes, being outrageous in a preacherly way. > > > > > > From: "authfriend@..." >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:13 AM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I stand with U Buck Col Leed > > > > >For Buck to falsely claim what he wrote came from the Bible is not what I'd >call integrity, nor is admiring what he did. > > >Not a thing wrong with what Buck wrote on its own terms, as far as I'm >concerned. Citing it as biblical, however, is very wrong. > > >YMMV. > > > >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: >> >> >> >>I don't understand this authbabe. >> >>Just because the Colonel liked it, doesn't have anything to >>do with integrity. It's just Buck's playful twist on it. >> >> >>--- "authfriend" wrote: >>> >>> You like that he wrote something about the Unified Field >>> and pretended it came from the Bible? >>> >>> Such integrity. >>> >>> >>> --- "leedwilliam" wrote: >>> > >>> > NICE, going Buck am with U in all >>> > >>> > >>> > > dhamiltony2k5@... writes: >>> > > >>> > > In National unity of empathy and with great concern >>> > > for the dead >>> > > >>> > > and their communities of families and friends, >>> > > >>> > > by the best of science >>> > > >>> > > I should like to see a National Day of meditation >>> > > called >>> > > >>> > > for by the White House as a National coming together >>> > > >>> > > in a Unified Field. >>> > > >>> > > -Buck >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > For, >>> > > >>> > > "Where two or three are gathered in effective >>> > > transcending meditation there the Unified Field will >>> > > be found multiplied in effect" -Matthew 18:20 >>> > > >> >> > >
