uthors Walking the Faith Line with Eboo Patel  
                                             Talk of the Nation, July 19, 2007 
·  Author Eboo Patel talks about the hate and rejection he sees in many young 
religious extremists, and why ignoring the faith line that divides us comes at 
a huge price. 
                         Eboo Patel, author of Acts of Faith: The Story of an 
American Muslim, the Struggle for the Soul of a Generation and founder of 
Interfaith Youth Core in Chicago
                                                                              
Excerpt: Acts of Faith  by Eboo Patel 
                              
            
     
  
   
 
    
                                             Introduction: The Faith Line
                         Someone who doesn't make flowers makes thorns.
If you're not building rooms where wisdom can be openly spoken, you're building 
a prison.
Shams of Tabriz
                         Eric Rudolph is in court pleading guilty. But he is 
not sorry. Not for the radio-controlled nail bomb that he detonated at New 
Woman All Women Health Care in Birmingham, Alabama, that killed an off-duty 
police officer and left a nurse hobbled and half-blind. Not for the bomb at the 
1996 Olympics in Atlanta that killed one, injured dozens, and sent shock waves 
of fear through the global community. Not for his hate-spitting letter stating, 
"We declare and will wage total war on the ungodly communist regime in New York 
and your legislative bureaucratic lackeys in Washington," signed "the Army of 
God." Not for defiling the Holy Bible by writing "bomb" in the margin of his 
copy.
                         In fact, Rudolph is proud and defiant. He lectures the 
judge on the righteousness of his actions. He gloats as he recalls federal 
agents passing within steps of his hiding place. He unabashedly states that 
abortion, homosexuality, and all hints of "global socialism" still need to be 
"ruthlessly opposed." He does this in the name of Christianity, quoting from 
the New Testament: "I have fought the good fight, I have finished my course, I 
have kept the faith."
                         Felicia Sanderson lost her husband, Robert, a police 
officer, to Rudolph's Birmingham bomb. During the sentencing hearing, she 
played a tape of speeches made at her husband's funeral. People remembered him 
keeping candy for children in his patrol car and raising money to replace 
Christmas gifts for a family whose home had been robbed. Felicia Sanderson 
pointed to Rudolph and told the court, "He has been responsible for every tear 
my sons have shed."
                         Judge C. Lynwood Smith sentenced Rudolph to two life 
terms, compared him to the Nazis, and said that he was shocked at Rudolph's 
lack of remorse. But many others felt a twitch of pride.
                         Eric Rudolph might have been a loner, but he did not 
act alone. He was produced by a movement and encouraged by a culture. In the 
woods of western North Carolina, where Rudolph evaded federal agents for five 
years, people cheered him on, helped him hide, made T-shirts that said RUN 
RUDOLPH RUN. The day he was finally caught, a woman from the area was quoted as 
saying, "Rudolph's a Christian and I'm a Christian . . . Those are our values. 
These are our woods."
                         Of all the information published about Rudolph, one 
sentence in particular stood out to me: Rudolph wrote an essay denying the 
Holocaust when he was in high school. How does a teenager come to hold such a 
view?
                         The answer is simple: people taught him. Eric Rudolph 
had always had trouble in school — fights, truancy. He never quite fit in. His 
father died when he was young. His mother met and followed a series of 
dangerous iconoclasts who preached a theology of hate. The first was Tom 
Branham, who encouraged the Rudolph family to move next door to him in Topton, 
North Carolina. Eric was soon drawing Nazi symbols in his schoolbooks at nearby 
Nantahala High School. Next, Eric's mother moved the family to Schell City, 
Missouri, to be near Dan Gayman, a leading figure in the extremist Christian 
Identity movement. Gayman had been a high school principal and knew how to make 
his mark on young people. He assumed a fatherly relationship with Eric, 
enrolled him in Christian Identity youth programs, and made sure he read the 
literature of the movement. Gayman taught Eric that the Bible was the history 
of Aryan whites and that Jews were the spawn of Satan and part of a
 tribe called the "the mud people." The world was nearing a final struggle 
between God's people and Satan's servants, and it was up to the "conscious" 
Aryans to ensure victory for the right race. Eric took to calling the 
television "the Electric Jew." He carved swastikas into his mother's living 
room furniture.
                         His library included virulently anti-Semitic 
publications such as The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Anne Frank's 
Diary: A Hoax, and The International Jew. Under the tutelage of Gayman and 
other radical preachers, Eric Rudolph's hate did what hate always does: it 
spread.
                         I imagine these preachers felt a surge of pride when 
Rudolph responded to Judge Smith's question about whether he set off the bomb 
in Birmingham with a smug, "I certainly did."
                         Middle school students in Whitwell, Tennessee, are 
giving tours of one of the most profound Holocaust memorials anywhere in the 
world: a German railcar that was used to transport Jews to Auschwitz. The young 
people ask guests to imagine how it might feel to be one of the seventy or 
eighty Jews packed into that tight space, hearing the wheels clanking as the 
train took them to torture and death. They explain that the railcar is filled 
with millions of paper clips, each one a symbol of a Jew murdered by the Nazis. 
One student says that to see a paper clip now is to think of a soul. The sign 
at the entrance of the memorial reads: "We ask you to pause and reflect on the 
evil of intolerance and hatred." The sign on the way out states: "What can I do 
to spread the message of love and tolerance these children have demonstrated 
with this memorial?"
                         One Whitwell student tour guide, about to graduate 
from eighth grade, reflects, "In the future, when I come back and see it, 
knowing that I was here to do this, it will be not just a memory, but kind of 
like in your heart, that you've changed the way that people think about other 
people."
                         Whitwell is a town of fewer than two thousand 
residents, located outside Chattanooga in the coal mining region of 
southeastern Tennessee, about a hundred miles from where the Ku Klux Klan was 
born. It has two traffic lights and a whole lot of GOD BLESS AMERICA signs. The 
mines closed thirty years ago, leaving the region even poorer than it was 
before. You can count the number of black and Latino families in Whitwell on 
two hands, and you won't need any of those fingers to count the number of 
Catholics, Jews, and Muslims, because there aren't any.
                         Why would white Protestant kids in a poor region with 
a history
                         of prejudice care so much about educating people about 
Judaism? The answer is simple: people taught them. The principal of Whitwell 
Middle School, Linda Hooper, wanted the students in her school to learn about 
cultures and people who are different from themselves. "Our children, they are 
respectful; they are thoughtful; they are caring. But
                         they are pretty much homogeneous. When we come up to 
someone who is not like us, we don't have a clue."
                         She sent a teacher to a diversity conference, and he 
came back with the idea of a Holocaust education project. "This was our need," 
Hooper said.
                         Over the next several years, the students at Whitwell 
studied that horrible time, met with Holocaust survivors, learned about the 
rich tradition of Judaism, and taught all the people they touched about the 
powerful role that young people can play in advocating for pluralism.
                         Lena Gitter, a ninety-five-year-old Holocaust 
survivor, heard about the project and wrote the students a letter: "I witnessed 
what intolerance and indifference can lead to. I am thankful that late in life 
I can see and hear that the teaching of tolerance is alive and well and bears 
fruit. When you ask the young, they will do the right thing. With tears in my 
eyes, I bow my head before you. Shalom."
                         Eric Rudolph and the young people of Whitwell are two 
very different responses to one of the most important questions of our time: in 
a world of passionate religiosity and intense interaction, how will people from 
different faith backgrounds engage one another? Rudolph responded to people who 
were different by building bombs of destruction. The students of Whitwell 
responded to diversity by building bridges of understanding. Rudolph is a 
religious totalitarian. The students of Whitwell are religious pluralists. They 
are on different sides of the faith line.
                         One hundred years ago, the great African American 
scholar
                         W. E. B. Du Bois famously said, "The problem of the 
twentieth century is the problem of the color line." I believe that the 
twenty-first century will be shaped by the question of the faith line. On one 
side of the faith line are the religious totalitarians. Their conviction is 
that only one interpretation of one religion is a legitimate way of being, 
believing, and belonging on earth. Everyone else needs to be cowed, or 
converted, or condemned, or killed. On the other side of the faith line are the 
religious pluralists, who hold that people believing in different creeds and 
belonging to different communities need to learn to live together. Religious 
pluralism is neither mere coexistence nor forced consensus. It is a form of 
proactive cooperation that affirms the identity of the constituent communities 
while emphasizing that the wellbeing of each and all depends on the health of 
the whole. It is the belief that the common good is best served when
 each community has a chance to make its unique contribution.
                         Religious totalitarians have the unique advantage of 
being able to oppose each other and work together at the same time. Osama bin 
Laden says that Christians are out to destroy Muslims. Pat Robertson says that 
Muslims want only to dominate Christians. Bin Laden points to Pat Robertson as 
evidence of his case. Robertson points to bin Laden as proof of his. Bin Laden 
says he is moving Muslims to his side of the faith line. Robertson claims he is 
moving Christians to his. But if you look from a certain angle, you see that 
they are not on opposite sides at all. They are right next to each other, 
standing shoulder to shoulder, a most unlikely pair, two totalitarians working 
collectively against the dream of a common life together.
                         The outcome of the question of the faith line depends 
on which side young people choose. Young people have always played a key role 
in social movements, from the struggle against apartheid in South Africa to the 
rise of the Nazi Party in Germany. We live in an era where the populations of 
the most religiously volatile areas of the world are strikingly young. 
Seventy-five percent of India's one billion plus are not yet twenty-five. 
Eighty-five percent of the people who live in the Palestinian territories are 
under age thirty-three. More than two-thirds of the people of Iran are under 
age thirty. The median age in Iraq is nineteen and a half. All of these people 
are standing on the faith line. Whose message are they hearing?
                         Watching Paper Clips, the documentary film made about 
the Whitwell students, I could not help but wonder: What if Linda Hooper had 
gotten to Eric Rudolph before Dan Gayman did? What if Rudolph had attended the 
First United Methodist Church in Whitwell, which hosted the events for the 
Holocaust project, instead of Christian Identity youth programs, had helped 
collect paper clips with the other kids at Whitwell Middle School instead of 
studying with bigots, had read Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl instead of 
Anne Frank's Diary: A Hoax? Eric Rudolph the religious terrorist was not 
inevitable, just as the teenage bridge builders of Whitwell were not. They were 
each carefully and intentionally nurtured.
                         This is a book about how some young people become 
champions of religious pluralism while others become the foot soldiers of 
religious totalitarianism. Its thesis is simple: influences matter, programs 
count, mentors make a difference, institutions leave their mark. When we look 
back in the lives of young religious terrorists, we find a web of individuals 
and organizations that shaped them. These young killers are not, for the most 
part, dramatically deranged individuals. They are kids who fell into 
murderously manipulative hands. Every time we see a teenager kill someone in 
the name of God, we should picture a pair of shadowy hands behind him, showing 
him how to make the bomb or point the gun, giving him a manual with the prayers 
to say while committing murder, steadying his shaking hands with callused, 
steely ones, blessing him as he resolves to do the deed. And then we should 
ask: why weren't the hands of people who care about pluralism shaping
 that kid instead of the hands of religious totalitarians?
                         Religious extremism is a movement of young people 
taking action. Hindu nationalists, hate-filled rabbis, Christian Identity 
preachers, and Muslim totalitarians prey on young people's desire to have a 
clear identity and make a powerful impact. We see their successes in the 
headlines of our newspapers every day. Interfaith cooperation is too often a 
conference of senior religious leaders talking. No doubt these leaders play a 
crucial role in religious bridge building. They have broken important 
theological ground, articulated frameworks for interfaith understanding, and 
sent the signal that cooperation with the religious Other is not only possible 
but necessary. Yet few in my generation have been involved.
                         I am an American Muslim from India. My adolescence was 
a series of rejections, one after another, of the various dimensions of my 
heritage, in the belief that America, India, and Islam could not coexist within 
the same being. If I wanted to be one, I could not be the others. My struggle 
to understand the traditions I belong to as mutually enriching rather than 
mutually exclusive is the story of a generation of young people standing at the 
crossroads of inheritance and discovery, trying to look both ways at once. 
There is a strong connection between finding a sense of inner coherence and 
developing a commitment to pluralism. And that has everything to do with who 
meets you at the crossroads.
                         When I was in college, I had the sudden realization 
that all of my
                         heroes were people of deep faith: Dorothy Day, the 
Dalai Lama, Martin
                         Luther King Jr., Mahatma Gandhi, Malcolm X, the Aga 
Khan. Moreover, they were all of different faiths. A little more research 
revealed two additional insights. First, religious cooperation had been central 
to the work of most of these faith heroes. The Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. 
partnered with Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel in the struggle for civil rights. 
Mahatma Gandhi stated that Hindu Muslim unity was just as important to him as a 
free India. Second, each of my faith heroes assumed an important leadership 
role at a young age. King was only twenty-six years old when he led the 
Montgomery bus boycott. Gandhi was even younger when he started his movement 
against unjust laws in early-twentieth-century South Africa.
                         I attended my first interfaith conference when I was 
twenty-one and discovered that I was the youngest person there by some thirty 
years. The more conferences I went to, the more I found that general pattern 
held true. I could not help but reflect upon the young King in Montgomery or 
the young Gandhi in Johannesburg. I knew my generation had faith heroes of 
courage and vision. Why weren't they more visibly involved in the crucial 
project of building religious pluralism, resurrecting the tradition of Gandhi 
and King in a global era characterized by religious conflict? The faces of 
religious fanatics were young; the faces of interfaith cooperation were old. 
Something had to change.
                         Change happens internally before it takes place in the 
world. My transformation was catalyzed by a moment of failure.
                         In high school, the group I ate lunch with included a 
Cuban Jew, a Nigerian Evangelical, and an Indian Hindu. We were all devout to a 
degree, but we almost never talked about our religions with one another. Often 
somebody would announce at the table that he couldn't eat a certain kind of 
food, or any food at all, for a period of time. We all knew religion hovered 
behind this, but nobody ever offered any explanation deeper than "my mom said," 
and nobody ever asked for one.
                         This silent pact relieved all of us. We were not 
equipped with a language that allowed us to explain our faith to others or to 
ask about anyone else's. Back then, I thought little about the dangers lurking 
within this absence.
                         A few years after we graduated, my Jewish friend 
reminded me of a dark time during our adolescence. There were a group of kids 
in our high school who, for several weeks, took up scrawling anti-Semitic slurs 
on classroom desks and making obscene statements about Jews in the hallways. I 
did not confront them. I did not comfort my Jewish friend. I knew little about 
what Judaism meant to him, less about the emotional effects of anti-Semitism, 
and next to nothing about how to stop religious bigotry. So I averted my eyes 
and avoided my friend, because I couldn't stand to face him.
                         A few years later, he described to me the fear he had 
experienced coming to school those days, and his utter loneliness as he had 
watched his close friends simply stand by. Hearing him recount his suffering 
and my complicity is the single most humiliating experience of my life. I did 
not know it in high school, but my silence was betrayal: betrayal of Islam, 
which calls upon Muslims to be courageous and compassionate in the face of 
injustice; betrayal of America, a nation that relies on its citizens to hold up 
the bridges of pluralism when others try to destroy them; betrayal of India, a 
country that has too often seen blood flow in its cities and villages when 
extremists target minorities and others fail to protect them.
                         My friend needed more than my silent presence at the 
lunch table. Pluralism is not a default position, an autopilot mode. Pluralism 
is an intentional commitment that is imprinted through action. It requires 
deliberate engagement with difference, outspoken loyalty to others, and 
proactive protection in the breach. You have to choose to step off the faith 
line onto the side of pluralism, and then you have to make your voice heard. To 
follow Robert Frost, it is easy to see the death of pluralism in the fire of a 
suicide bombing. But the ice of silence will kill it just as well.
                         This is a story of returning to faith, of finding 
coherence, of committing to pluralism, and of the influences I owe my life to.
                         ACTS OF FAITH: The Story of an American Muslim, the 
Struggle for the Soul of a Generation by Eboo Patel Copyright © 2007 by Eboo 
Patel Reprinted by permission of Beacon Press, Boston
                                       
                  
                                                     /**  * echeck function 
modified from DHTML email validation script. Courtesy of SmartWebby.com 
(http://www.smartwebby.com/dhtml/)  */ function echeck(str) {    var at="@"   
var dot="."   var lat=str.indexOf(at)   var lstr=str.length   var 
ldot=str.indexOf(dot)   if (str.indexOf(at)==-1){      alert("Please check the 
the format of the email addresses you entered.")      return false   }    if 
(str.indexOf(at)==-1 || str.indexOf(at)==0 || str.indexOf(at)==lstr){      
alert("Please check the the format of the email addresses you entered.")      
return false   }    if (str.indexOf(dot)==-1 || str.indexOf(dot)==0 || 
str.indexOf(dot)==lstr){       alert("Please check the the format of the email 
addresses you entered.")       return false   }     if 
(str.substring(lat-1,lat)==dot || str.substring(lat+1,lat+2)==dot){       
alert("Please check the the format of the email addresses you entered.")       
return false    }     if
 ((str.indexOf(" ")!=-1) & (str.indexOf(" ")!=str.length-1)){  //altered by eme 
-- a space at the end should be ok       alert("Please check the the format of 
the email addresses you entered.")       return false    }      return true  }  
 function deleteSpaces(textStr)  {   // replace any spaces/linebreak characters 
w/ nothing   var textStrSave = textStr.value.replace(/[\s]+/g, "");   
textStrSave = textStrSave.replace(/\;/g, ',');   textStr.value= textStrSave;  } 
  function formSubmit() {   if (checkStation()==0) {    docUrl = document.URL;  
  document.frmSendToFriend.title.value=document.title;    poundFind = 
docUrl.indexOf("#");     if (poundFind>-1)     {      docUrl = 
docUrl.substring(0, poundFind);     }     if (docUrl.substring(0, 
14)=="http://npr.org";)     {      docUrl = "http://www.npr.org"; + 
docUrl.substring(14, docUrl.length);     }     
document.frmSendToFriend.pageUrl.value= docUrl;             if (window.vstag)   
          {                
 document.frmSendToFriend.vstopic.value = window.vstag.primaryTopic;            
     document.frmSendToFriend.vsprogram.value = window.vstag.programId;         
        document.frmSendToFriend.vsagg.value = window.vstag.aggIds;             
    document.frmSendToFriend.vsbyline.value = window.vstag.byline;             
}             else             {                 
document.frmSendToFriend.vstopic.value = 0;                 
document.frmSendToFriend.vsprogram.value = 0;                 
document.frmSendToFriend.vsagg.value = 0;                 
document.frmSendToFriend.vsbyline.value = 0;             }    
from=document.frmSendToFriend.from.value;    
to=document.frmSendToFriend.recipient.value;              if 
(document.frmSendToFriend.MSG.value.length > 600)             {                 
alert("Your message contains " + document.frmSendToFriend.MSG.value.length + " 
characters. The maximum is 600 characters. Please shorten your message and try 
again.");                
 document.frmSendToFriend.MSG.focus();                 return false;            
 }     if ((to==null)||(to=="") || (from==null)||(from=="")){     alert("Please 
enter information into the email address fields.");     
document.frmSendToFriend.recipient.focus();     return false;    } else if 
((echeck(from)==false) || (echeck(to)==false)){     return false    } else {    
 document.frmSendToFriend.submit();    }   }  }   function checkStation() {   
if ( ((document.frmSendToFriend.callletters.value== "Enter Call Letters") || 
(document.frmSendToFriend.callletters.value== "")) & 
(document.frmSendToFriend.localcontact[0].checked == true)) {    alert ("Please 
enter the call letters of your local NPR member station if you would like to 
receive information from them.");    return 1;   } else {    return 0;   }  }   
    
       
---------------------------------
Luggage? GPS? Comic books? 
Check out fitting  gifts for grads at Yahoo! Search.

Reply via email to