MZ having a most peculiar view of God "witnessing" the actual death of the supernatural context of creation. Is trying to get mystical experiences after the Allied Bombing of Mt Cassino, really ambiguous at best?
Is it not "strange" for a Christian/Catholic not to believe in resurrection?Or is it just a hero style pose a la Nietsche,''To give style'' to his character -- certainly a great and rare art according to Friedrich Nietzsche? [;)] * Something given and allow for (y)our altering mystical experiences: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcfMUHCV5bw&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNWw_ju_E2U&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lI5QB0uM5Vs&feature=related History:The Bombing of Monte Cassino TIME:Monday, Feb. 28, 1944 http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,796392-1,00.html Error led to bombing of Monte Cassino Monastery destroyed after translation slip by British intelligence officer http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2000/apr/04/johnezard So may be just a "balls-up" BTW.If the actual German message received by the allied radio operator contained as many grammatical errors as the German in guardian's article, I'm not surprised confusion ensued e.g.'Ist Abt in Kloster?' and was answered, 'Ja in Kloster mit Monchen'. ="Ist der Abt im Kloster?"-"Ja im Kloster mit den Moenchen" etc etc The translation was then 'Is the HQ in the abbey?' - the word 'Abt' being taken as an abbreviation for 'Abteilung' (a battalion) rather than abbot. The key point is that all language contains built-in "redundancy" - we hear only a proportion of any verbal information that reaches us. In contrast of course to all sorts of mystics, who, fairer and foolisher(Nietzsche), talk of "inspiration"and vision without any "redundancy" ? [:D] *But giving "style to one's character" may applies to the life-form of the individual and its identity. As soon as we talk about `form' (like in `life-form'), we certainly talk about the task of forming. And as soon as we do not assume that life-forms are something given and allow for our altering them, we are authorized to raise the question of what kind of `stylesheet' applies to the task of forming. Does all pose of a "stylesheet" as though his real opinions had been discovered and attained through the self-evolving of a cold, pure, divinely indifferent dialectic , whereas, in fact, a prejudiced proposition, idea, or "suggestion," which is generally a heart's desire abstracted and refined, is defended by with arguments sought out after the event?
