2003, 
 (Though my mother's side of the family is old Iowa Quaker (Whittier-
 Springville, Ia. via Flushing, Oh. and the Carolinas) and runs 
 directly back to England, I am not currently really versed or 
 participating in things Quaker. My own interests are more abstract. 
 However, I thought you all might appreciate these thoughts on Quaker 
 Meeting as practice as we are doing it out in the hinterlands. 
 
 Best Regards from very Southeastern Iowa,
 

 
[paste:]
 

 
 
 Friends Journal
 
 
 
 
 
 Dear Editors;
 
 
 
 Your July 2003 'Welcome to Newcomers' article in Friends Journal 
 came in good timing as good food for thought. I live in a community 
 where several of us have sat on occasion and worshipped as Friends. 
 In our town we have several experienced Quakers. Some Earlham 
 College grads. Some Eastern birth-rights who went to Friends schools 
 out there. Some Midwest birth-rights. Some Scattergood Friends. 
 Also a few convinced Friends who were in Meetings elsewhere at other 
 times. In the last 25-30 years in our little town occasionally we 
 have met but nothing as far as having a regular Friends 
 Meeting. 
 
 
 
 Following after the vocations of our different lives we 
 are 'fallen between-the-cracks-friends' as Teddy Milne describes in 
 her Friends Journal article on membership. I believe that all of us 
 here, whether formerly affiliated as Quakers or not, would claim our 
 religious or spiritual affiliation as Quaker, regardless. Though none of us 
are 
 members of organized formal Friends Meetings otherwise.
 
 
 
 Hence, when we do meet it is truly as friends pursuing a 
 corporate practice of sitting together in a powerful silence. When 
 we do meet it is in common as with the Quaker Practice 
 suggested by Esther Greenleaf Murer in the Friends Journal on 'Why 
 Come to Meeting' on time? Coming to Meeting, as in the corporate 
 nature of our peculiar Quaker worship.
 
 
 
 For those of us as Friends living here in this little 
 Iowa town known for its thousands of Transcendental Meditators, 
 mostly our Quaker practice as Friends we have absorbed into a larger 
 testimony of a group practice of meditation with a larger activist 
 endeavor. In itself that is an endeavor of corporate practice of 
 sitting in cultivated silence towards a so called 'Field Effect' of a 
collective world spiritual 
 peace. Living in our 'meditating' community here as Friends we each 
 recognize it experientially as Quaker in form though it has been part 
 of another larger experiment incorporating aspects of Quaker method 
 of sitting in group, on large scale. 
 
 
 
 For years and now for decades, we have had group 
 meditations of many hundreds people everyday and sometimes thousands, 
 with many of us spending an hour and a half to three or four or five 
 hours a day silently meditating in group. It has been a very 
 powerful corporate experience spiritually for the many of those who 
 have pursued it. The 'weight' of it I think any of the founding 
 Quakers would have recognized as part of their own experience. 
 
 
 
 The experience, while I experience it as similar, does 
 not exactly transpose over in the terms of definitions that Quaker 
 authors like Davies or Knowles in their Journal article would like. 
 It is much more simple and powerful in nature; more like Marty Grundy 
 in her 'Sit Thee Here' article in the Journal . I know weighty 
 Friends in the same way that I know weighty 'meditators' from our 
 community here. Weighty in the 'throw-power' of their cultivated 
 silence. I really appreciate the way that Marty Grundy catches the 
 gravity of this weight in her words. It is a very abstract thing but 
 Marty catches it:
 
[snip] " Â…But the older Friend did much more. As she settled into 
 worship, slipping into that familiar deep openness to God's Spirit, 
 she silently drew the visitor with her. 
 
 Many Friends have had the precious experience of sitting 
 near a weighty Friend and being drawn by that Friend's experience 
 into a deeper, more prayerful place." And then the next two 
 paragraphs enlarging on this. 
 
 
 
 This weightiness comes in time from just doing it through 
 time in practice. It becomes its own standard of weight in 
 experience. 
 
 
 
 Now, recently as aspects of the larger Transcendental Meditation (TM) group 
 participation here in this town have become less inclusive, the 
 larger group meditation practice has dwindled in scope. The several 
 of us old-Quakers who have been active in the larger community group 
 meditations have been exploring a refuge in the tradition of our old 
 Quaker practice that is without the exclusive trappings of our 
 community 'meditation' TM organization. 
 
 
 
 Separations are nothing new even to Quaker Meetings also 
 along the same lines: cultivated experiential practitioners 
 (conservatives) on the one hand and then those dogmatic cultist mood-
 makers of faith (evangelicals) on the other. I see this even still within 
 the range of so-called conservatives in your pages of the Friends Journal. 
 There seems an evident split of idea about Quakerism. Whether 
 Friends exclusively are those who must also believe in all the 
 testimonies or if they are first Quakers who worship in meeting and then 
 maybe are lead to testimonies, or not. Is it all or nothing to be a member 
 Quaker? Can there be a place for those who just come for worship and 
 possibly have an intense experience at that without having to also 
 become an activist on every social issue also? What is minimally 
 fundamental here? Myself, I look to the words of the primitive 
 Quakers for those answers, for original intent. That is always 
 clarifying and tempering. 
 
 
 
 Where I live, in a quiet reaction which seeks a refuge 
 from forming dogma, poor administration, and bad behavior in the TM 
 organization several of us as old Friends have begun to sit together again 
 more regularly in Quaker Meeting. As we have gathered month by month 
 for the last half year or more, we have come simply as worshipping 
 Friends, without agenda and without burden of other Quaker testimony 
 other than to sit together in worship as method, primitive in form. 
 We have gathered some appropriate quotes from founding Quakers for 
 reference to lead us in our practice. Then too we draw on our 
 experience as Friends. 
 
 
 
 Together in a corporate practice it has been very 
 satisfying spiritually in experience. We pick a Sunday every month 
 that works and meet in homes for Quaker worship without a clerk. The 
 meetings have easily happened between friends.  For some time now,
 The corporate practice has progressed in to weekly Friends Meeting as
 Quakers.  
 
 
 
 Following your July Issue about membership, I felt you 
 might enjoy learning of these experiences. We live in an area of 
 Iowa where there were once many un-programmed Quaker Meetings in the 
 19th Century. As near as I can figure there probably have not been 
 un-programmed meetings in the Southeast corner of Iowa since around 
 the turn of the 20th Century. 
 
 
 
 I do not see that we will form a Meeting though we will 
 continue to meet in practice of worship as Quakers. In time there 
 may be the possibility of forming a Meeting. For now there is not a 
 large affinity with everything else that is Society of Friends that 
 might also not also be necessarily relevant to us as individuals for now.
 In many ways we are already working on our own activisms of issues and 
testimony. 
 I would say that this generally is a pretty 'activist' group of 
 people, each in their own right. However, for now, First things 
 first. The first thing here seems to be more about turning on the 
 light.
 
 
 
 Sincerely, 
 
 
 
 Doug Hamilton
 
 
 
 Fairfield, Iowa 
 
 
 
 
 
 p.s. if there may be things of interest to you or your Journal 
 writers in what I have written here, you can forward and share this 
 around. -D


Reply via email to