Our Western notions about “God” emerge through the theological lens of Semitic 
Monotheism - Judism, Christianity, and Islam. That’s why we so casually pitch 
forth the term “God” rather than “the gods” – as our Greek and Roman ancestors 
once did. The Semite god is fundamentally a tyrant in the Greek “polis” 
(city-state) sense of that term. This means the Semitic “God” is a monarch who 
at will exercises power in a ruthless, pitiless manner – as an oppressive, 
harsh, arbitrary person. 
  
 Apposite this cruel despot steps forth the weeping Jesus – wounded in his 
“heart” by our iniquitous and malevolent self-will. Won’t you open your 
darkened, ego-obsessed soul to the bleeding Jesu and put his cross in place of 
your own wickedly defying “I”?  Of course, if you fail to replace You with Him, 
Jesu, like big God, will likewise send you into the pit and the fire! Then you 
can count on torment without intermission for as long as eternity lasts – all 
just because He can.
  
 Opposite this parody of a Semitic king, is the concept of Patanjali’s Ishvara. 
The term Ishvara means ruler, owner, master. Patanjali’s Ishvara is a specific, 
different (viseša) purusha never possessing afflictions, karmic acts and 
results or deposits of  habitual tendencies. However, this Ishvara is was never 
a creator in the Semite sense.
  
 Apparently, Patanjali included the concept of Ishvara because yogins bent upon 
samâdhi and liberation had direct experience with a cosmic intelligence that 
was accessible for receiving teachings and grace. His codification of the sound 
(shabda) of Ishvara and the means to its realization was Patanjali’s 
contribution to direct realization through “pranava (omkara) repetition and 
contemplation of its meaning”. 
  
 Contrary to this, Buddhists believe in puny “worldly” devas but deny a cosmic 
creator/ruler. The Dalai Lama calls it “the god concept”. However, in Tantric 
Buddhism they do indeed use “om” as a cosmic sound and as a conceptual 
construct for transcendence. 
  
 All of this should show just how insular and self-involved this Semite-rooted 
concept of Judeo-Christo-Islamic “Godism” has become and just how widely it has 
infiltrated both our historical and current thinking.

Reply via email to