DOJ said "and I was not naked". [when I made made the pass. aka rudely
and inappropriately hit on the woman (whom he employed? -- was he
running the course?]

We all have become jaded and wise to parsed statements. If not in
college, if not in crafting TMO press releases, if not in writing
post-TMO resumes, if not thru watergate, then certainly we got a bit
more streetwise after clinton.

When asked about drug use in his college years, Bill said, "I did not
break any US drug laws". Of course the question had to do with drug
use in Oxford (UK) and thus his response sounds ok to the casual
reader /listener, but is a joke of evasion for anyone tuned in.

DOJ said "and I was not naked". [when inappropriately hitting on the
woman]. OK. But David didn't just fall off the turnip truck. He spent
decades crafting precise language about TM to enhance the appearance
of legitamacy, normaliacy and effectiveness, while down playing, if
not avoiding any light to shine, on less publically appealing aspects
of TM.

So when he makes a parsed statement like "and I was not naked" it
raises questions. OK, you were not naked. What other  possible
statements are consistent with this but not ones he would wish to
disclose explicitly:

"I was just in boxers shorts and my wing wang was hanging out the slit
in the front."

"I just had a t-shirt on".

"I was still wearing soxs"

....

Perhaps, "and I was not naked" was just a simply phrased, innocent,
recollection of his account of what happened. But along with his, IMO,
phony unstressing explanation, and the implicit, "This was the FIRST
and ONLY time I EVER did this", it just makes the whole package of
accounts and explanations continue to stink up the place a bit.












To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Religion and spirituality Maharishi mahesh yogi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to