Practitioners might hear something like this and wonder, “If I’m 
not turning inward and seeing things as they are in and of themselves 
independently of my observing them, then what is my practice about?” 


I’d say it’s about commitment to a certain way of life and participation in a 
community (sangha) that supports that way of life. It’s about 
cultivating what we think are beneficial qualities of mind and body, and 
beneficial ways of acting or being in the world, as in the eightfold 
path. I’d say that practice in this full sense of the term, which goes 
well beyond sitting meditation, is its own purpose or goal and is itself the 
expression of a noble way of life. It’s what philosophers and 
psychologists call autotelic, an end in itself, not a tool or instrument for 
something else.
I object when people reduce practice in this rich sense to a tool or 
instrument. Some people use the analogy that meditation is like an inner
 telescope: Outer science uses physical telescopes for looking at the 
stars, and inner science uses meditation for looking at the mind. I 
don’t like that analogy. It makes you think of your relationship to your
 own mind in an instrumental way. Your relationship to yourself is 
precisely not an instrumental one. A telescope is a tool for 
looking at something separate and distant. 

Meditation isn’t like that. 
If you think that awareness is an instrument that enables you to look 
within, on that analogy you’re thinking of the inner realm as one of 
objectivity—except it’s not, because it’s subjectivity. If you think of 
meditation that way, you can’t help turning your mind into an object, 
which is precisely what the mind is not. So here I think there is an 
important difference between meditation and scientific observation, 
despite the importance of concepts for making sense of both. Meditation 
can be very powerful and transformative: it can be very generative of 
insight, deep understanding, and connectedness. But not because it’s an 
instrument or tool that enables you to see a hidden inner realm.

http://www.tricycle.com/interview/embodied-mind
  
             
The Embodied Mind | Tricycle
To be fruitful, the encounter between Buddhism and science demands intellectual 
boundary crossers—rare scholars who are expert in both realms, who can 
translate ...  
View on www.tricycle.com Preview by Yahoo  

Reply via email to