Concerning a recent post viewed only in Yahoo Message View and never clicked on:
Re: Because torture is so sexy <../../../message/232848> This is the sort of thing that Liberal Dude Nation would say is unimportant - that it has no effect on reality, these glamorized images of torture. Bullshit. ... I think it is useful to remember that the person making this post (which I assume that she didn't really write because frankly she doesn't have the chops to come up with her own rants, and only reposts the rants of others) is the person who has made by far the most "torture fantasy" posts on FFL. If I were to do a search, I'm pretty sure I could come up with dozens of posts in which Raunchy has fantasized about cutting men's balls off, cutting their dicks off, and torturing them in other ways unimaginable to most of us. The *detail* with which she constructs her torture fantasies of the things she wants to do to men on this forum shows clearly 1) that she's put a lot of thought into how she would torture men, and 2) that she feels there is nothing the least bit wrong with posting these detailed fantasies in public. It's OK in Raunchy's book when she does it, fantasizing about torturing men, but not OK when marketers use S&M images with women in them to sell products. Welcome to Raunchydog World, where hypocrisy reigns almost as supreme as it does in Edg World.
