--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nice gag Judy. Playing along, Taking my response as serious
and therefore needing a serious school-marm pendantical
response from you.
Sorry, my bad. Barry snipped the attributions, and I
forgot you had made the remarks I was responding to
(that's why I prefaced my response with Robert,
don'cha know).
Its a great characture of an elitist -- one who has a stick so far
up
their butt that they have no clue when others are goofin --
ignoring
their quite divergent spelling, style, logic and all. Brilliant. You
nailed the elitist thing.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert babajii_99@
wrote:
(snip)
Using shame (shame of being female, shame of being
racist) rather than offering benefit is a tactic that
may intimidate some, and perhaps win some over who
would rather be part of the pack that attacks than
one who is attacked, but mostly it engenders
resentment.
Uh, Robert, that would be a big fat non sequitur.
I sur don't know what a non seequweeter is -- sounds like some hi
falutin words that some fancy elitist might use --- but there is
something mighty strange in the logic BillyBob uses here. Out
here in
the real america, where there are real women -- they don't get
shamed
by no philandering husband. Everyone knows hes the shithead.
Making it
all about the wife -- well thats shear hoccum pig shit.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Uh, Robert, that would be a big fat non sequitur.
Sorry you can't come up with a better response.
I sur don't know what a non seequweeter is -- sounds like
some hi falutin words that some fancy elitist might use...
(Robert, non sequitur is a common Latin phrase
meaning It does not follow.)
A non seequweeter is where one person in a
discussion (the more flexible one, able to
make associations that are not necessarily
linear and confined to a prewritten or pre-
programmed internal script) makes a logical
leap to a subject that seems to them directly
related to the discussion.
However, Robert's comment wasn't directly related
to the discussion, as Barry would know if he had
actually read my post. As Robert indicated in his
follow-up, he didn't understand what the blogger
I quoted was talking about, hence his non sequitur.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Uh, Robert, that would be a big fat non sequitur.
Sorry you can't come up with a better response.
I sur don't know what a non seequweeter is -- sounds like
some hi falutin words that some fancy elitist might use...
(Robert, non sequitur is a common Latin phrase
meaning It does not follow.)
A non seequweeter is where one person in a
discussion (the more flexible one, able to
make associations that are not necessarily
linear and confined to a prewritten or pre-
programmed internal script) makes a logical
leap to a subject that seems to them directly
related to the discussion.
However, Robert's comment wasn't directly related
to the discussion, as Barry would know if he had
actually read my post. As Robert indicated in his
follow-up, he didn't understand what the blogger
I quoted was talking about, hence his non sequitur.
