[FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta answers: What about the witness? Is it real or unreal?

2015-04-01 Thread Duveyoung
Q:   What about the witness? Is it real or unreal?


 
 Nisargadatta:  It is both. The last remnant of illusion, the first touch of 
the real. To say: I am only the witness is both false and true: false because 
of the 'I am', true because of the witness. It is better to say: 'there is 
witnessing'. The moment you say: 'I am', the entire universe comes into being 
along with its creator.



 



[FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta is brahma(n)??

2013-04-01 Thread card

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Iamthat_goethean.jpg

It seems to me the devanaagarii text reads something like:

ahaM brahmaasmi (brahma + asmi)

Why ain't it translated as

I am brahma(n)?



Re: [FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta is brahma(n)??

2013-04-01 Thread Share Long
I am That
Thou art That
All this is That
That alone is

That is very jealous of Brahman?





 From: card cardemais...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, April 1, 2013 4:16 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta is brahma(n)??
 

  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Iamthat_goethean.jpg

It seems to me the devanaagarii text reads something like:

ahaM brahmaasmi (brahma + asmi)

Why ain't it translated as

I am brahma(n)?


 

[FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta

2009-10-19 Thread Rick Archer
There is no sense of purpose in my doing anything. Things happen as they
happen -- not because I make them happen, but it is because I am that they
happen. In reality nothing ever happens. When the mind is restless, it makes
Shiva dance, like the restless waters of the lake make the moon dance. It is
all appearance, due to wrong ideas. 
...in whatever role I may appear and whatever function I may perform -- I
remain what I am: the 'I am' immovable, unshakable, independent. 
When I say 'I am', I do not mean a separate entity with a body as its
nucleus. I mean the totality of being, the ocean of consciousness, the
entire universe of all that is and knows. I have nothing to desire for I am
complete forever. 
Words betray their hollowness. The real cannot be described, it must be
experienced. I cannot find better words for what I know. What I say may
sound ridiculous. But what the words try to convey is the highest truth. All
is one, however much we quibble. And all is done to please the one source
and goal of every desire, whom we all know as the 'I am'. 
 


[FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta on the possibility of McCain becoming President

2008-11-04 Thread Rick Archer
If you imagine yourself as separate from the the world, the world  
will appear as separate from you and you will experience desire and  
fear. I do not see the world as separate from me and so there is  
nothing for me to desire, or fear.




[FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta sounds extraordinary to me. ( David Lynch and Psychosis)

2007-12-03 Thread Duveyoung
Nisargadatta sounds extraordinary to me.

You?

It's about energy.  He casts sound spells.

Edg

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante no_reply@ wrote:
 
  **
  
  Lynch drinks 20 cups of coffee a day (a level of caffeination that 
  puts him into the range consumed by Brian Wilson at the low point of 
  his craziness, trying to float his personality through a deep 
  depression), and although he quit smoking some time after starting 
  TM, he resumed a packaday habit after going without for 20 years. 
  These habits are unusual for a longterm TMer and are markers of a 
  nervous system so strongly stressed and twisted that it might indeed 
  be fairly characterized as borderline psychotic.
 
 I am glad we have so many hobby psychologists here. It might be
 interesting to you, that some of the most enlightened people on earth
 were heavy smokers. Nisargadatta Maharaj comes to mind. Coffee
 consumption is neither unusual with enlightened. A friend of mine knew
 a Lady saint in India living on coffee alone, not eating any food.
 
 Vaj and Edg might want to do a voice analysis based on this tape:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtF_Ud2M0HU





[FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta

2007-01-15 Thread Rick Archer
The Sense of I am (Consciousness)

When I met my Guru, he told me: You are not what you take yourself 
to be. Find out what you are. Watch the sense 'I am', find your real 
Self. I obeyed him, because I trusted him. I did as he told me. All 
my spare time I would spend looking at myself in silence. And what a 
difference it made, and how soon! 

My teacher told me to hold on to the sense 'I am' tenaciously and not 
to swerve from it even for a moment. I did my best to follow his 
advice and in a comparatively short time I realized within myself the 
truth of his teaching. All I did was to remember his teaching, his 
face, his words constantly. This brought an end to the mind; in the 
stillness of the mind I saw myself as I am -- unbound. 

I simply followed (my teacher's) instruction which was to focus the 
mind on pure being 'I am', and stay in it. I used to sit for hours 
together, with nothing but the 'I am' in my mind and soon peace and 
joy and a deep all-embracing love became my normal state. In it, all 
disappeared -- myself, my Guru, the life I lived, the world around 
me. Only peace remained and unfathomable silence.

My Guru ordered me to attend to the sense 'I am' and to give 
attention to nothing else. I just obeyed. I did not follow any 
particular course of breathing, or meditation, or study of 
scriptures.

 

Whatever happened, I would turn away my attention from it 
and remain with the sense 'I am', it may look too simple, even crude. 
My only reason for doing it was that my Guru told me so. Yet it 
worked! Obedience is a powerful solvent of all desires and fears.

~ Nisargadatta Maharaj

  

That in whom reside all beings and who reside in all beings, who is the
giver of grace to all, the Supreme Soul of the universe, the limitless
being--I am That.   ~ Amritbindu Upanishad

 

That which permeates all, which nothing transcends and which, like the
universal space around us, fills everything completely from within and
without, that Supreme non-dual Brahman --that thou are.  Shankara

 



[FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta Maharaj

2006-12-08 Thread hyperbolicgeometry
One might construe N's orientation as being fully non-attached ...or 
not; perhaps he lacks interest in relative considerations. Being 
external obserers, we don't know what the true situation is for sure. 
It's analogous to a Turing machine test: either a computer or a real 
person is answering questions behind some opaque substance which blocks 
our vision of the speaker.  We are required to guess whether the 
speaker is a computer or a real person, based solely on the content of 
the answers.
 Short of magical knowledge or cheating, our decision must be based on 
common sense considerations.
By analogy, consider the case of Nisagardatta Maharaj. Is his apparent 
lack of interest in things relative evidence of some deeper, more 
profound Realization than than possessed by MMY?  I think not.
 Simply because MMY expresses more interest in things relative than N, 
such as accumulating wealth, establishing Heaven on Earth, etc; this 
cannot (IMO) be constued as evidence that MMY's realization falls short 
of N's.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta Maharaj

2006-12-08 Thread Peter

--- hyperbolicgeometry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 One might construe N's orientation as being fully
 non-attached ...or 
 not; perhaps he lacks interest in relative
 considerations. Being 
 external obserers, we don't know what the true
 situation is for sure. 
 It's analogous to a Turing machine test: either a
 computer or a real 
 person is answering questions behind some opaque
 substance which blocks 
 our vision of the speaker.  We are required to guess
 whether the 
 speaker is a computer or a real person, based solely
 on the content of 
 the answers.
  Short of magical knowledge or cheating, our
 decision must be based on 
 common sense considerations.
 By analogy, consider the case of Nisagardatta
 Maharaj. Is his apparent 
 lack of interest in things relative evidence of some
 deeper, more 
 profound Realization than than possessed by MMY?  I
 think not.
  Simply because MMY expresses more interest in
 things relative than N, 
 such as accumulating wealth, establishing Heaven on
 Earth, etc; this 
 cannot (IMO) be constued as evidence that MMY's
 realization falls short 
 of N's.

Who said it fell short? MMY is as hollow and empty as
N's and vice versa.




 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 



 

Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com


[FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta quote

2006-12-07 Thread Marek Reavis
By looking tirelessly, I became quite empty and with that emptiness
all came back to me except the mind. I find I have lost the mind
irretrievably. I am neither conscious nor unconscious, I am beyond the
mind and its various states and conditions. Distinctions are created
by the mind and apply to the mind only. I am pure Consciousness
itself, unbroken awareness of all that is. I am in a more real state
than yours. I am undistracted by the distinctions and separations
which constitute a person. As long as the body lasts, it has its needs
like any other, but my mental process has come to an end. My thinking,
like my digestion, is unconscious and purposeful. I am not a person in
your sense of the word, though I may appear a person to you. I am that
infinite ocean of consciousness in which all happens. I am also beyond
all existence and cognition, pure bliss of being. There is nothing I
feel separate from, hence I am all. No thing is me, so I am nothing.
Life will escape, the body will die, but it will not affect me in the
least. Beyond space and time I am, uncaused, uncausing, yet the very
matrix of existence.



[FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta Maharaj on attainment and efforts

2006-03-24 Thread Vaj



Interesting for the importance of "ceaseless efforts", thoughts and kundalini and the process of creation. This is from the only work written by Nisargadatta Maharaj rather than by someone else. -S."One who takes to the path of the spirit starts with contemplation and propitiation. It is here, for the first time, that he finds some joy in prayer and worship. At this preliminary stage he gets the company of co-aspirants. Reading of the lives and works of past incarnations of God, of Rishis, of Saints and Sages, singing the glories of the Name, visiting temples, and a constant meditation on these result in the photic and phonic experiences of the mystic life; his desires are satisfied to an extent now. Thinking that he has had the vision of God, he intensifies his efforts of fondly remembering the name of God and His worship. In this state of the mind, the Bhakta quite frequently has a glimpse of his cherished deity, which he takes to be the divine vision and is satisfied with it. At this juncture, he is sure to come into contact with a Saint. The Saint, and now his preceptor, makes it plain to him that what he has had is not the real vision, which is beyond the said experiences, and is only to be had through Self Realisation. At this point, the aspirant reaches the stage of the meditator. In the beginning, the Sadhaka is instructed into the secrets of his own person, and of the indwelling spirit; the meaning and nature of Prana, the various plexuses, and the nature and arousal of the Kundalini, and the nature of the Self. Later on, he comes to know of the origin of the five elements, their activity, radiation, and merits and defects. Meanwhile his mind undergoes the process of purification and acquires composure, and this the Sadhaka experiences through the deep-laid subtle center of the Indweller; he also knows how and why it is there, only that the deiform element is kindled. This knowledge transforms him into the pure, eternal, and spiritual form of a Sadguru who is now in a position to initiate others into the secrets of the spirit. The stage of Sadhakahood ends here. As the great Saint Tukarama said, the aspirant must put in ceaseless efforts in the pursuit of spiritual life. Thoughts must be utilised for Self-knowledge. He must be alert and watchful in ascertaining the nature of this 'I' that is involved in the affairs of pleasure and pain arising out of sense experience."-Nisargadatta Maharaj





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[FairfieldLife] Nisargadatta, Siddharamesh, Ramesh, Banganga (was: Fake Gurus ..)

2006-03-12 Thread defenders_of_bhakti
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Thank you very much for the suggestion. 

Here are some quotations by Siddharameshwar, some stories about Ban
Ganga, some reflections on Ramesh.

First about Bhakti and Knowledge by Siddharameshwar Maharaj Guru of
Nisargadatta Maharaj, Guru of Ramesh Balsekar from 'Amrut Laya'
obtainable by Chetana Publishers in Bombay:


Parabrahman
If one separates Brahman from Parabrahman, then the former is called
Primordial Illusion (Mula Maya).Power and knowledge (Prakriti and
Purusha, as also Shakti and Shiva) are one and the same. Knowledge ia
a very subtle concept or thought. It is true that the God has created
this world, but the world exists only as long as the perishable body
exists. God exists only till the devotee exists and vice versa. So
long as the dream lasts the dreamer is present. However the basis of
all these is Parabrahman, where there is nothing. God has intense fear
of getting destroyed. Whatever is without fear is Parabrahman. In this
'stateless state' there is no God, no man or woman and no ignorance or
knowledge.If Brahma (God) or Parabrahman were the same, there would
have been no need at all for the prefix 'Para' (beyond).
 

Devotion and Knowledge
One should first attain and then speak. Body is bound by its own karma
(action), devotion is like a farm and knowledge is like a fruit.

At the beginning of this exposition reverential adoration has to be
offered to Sri Ganesh first, then to Sri Saraswati and finally to Sri
Satguru. What is the reason for this? If somebody asks If the
sequence of this adoration is changed, will there be confusion? The
answer has to be yes, there will be confusion, because Sri Ganesh is
the deity for meditation and contemplation, Sri Saraswati is the deity
who denotes the exposition, (through words). With the help of these
two deities, the deity in the form of light of the Self, which rises
in the heart of the aspirant is none other than the Satguru. Hence the
Satguru has to be adored necessarily after Sri Ganesha and Sri Saraswati.

Only when the understanding of the subject becomes firm, does the
grace of the Satguru of Self descend. Textual contemplation and
exposition of this subject alone will not lead the aspirant to his
goal.Hence, he should reverentially adore Sri Ganesh and Sri Saraswati.

Realizing the secret of the principle: first let the manifest form be
seen by the eyes and then Vedanta be extolled, the mouth should chant
the mantra (subtle name) and imprint its significance within.

All quotations from 'Amrut Laya' by Siddharameshwar Maharaj, Guru of
Nisargadatta Maharaj, Guru of Ramesh Balsekar.

Book can be obtained by Chetana Publications in Mumbai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Other books of interest by Nisargadatta, otainable by Chetana
I AM THAT
Seeds of Consciousness
Prior to Consciousness
Consciousness and the Absolute (Final Talks)
Pointers from Nisargadatta Maharaj by Ramesh Balsekar 

===
BANGANGA

I went to the Samadhi of Siddharameshwar three times during my stay,
just to hang out and meditate, usually after the morning talks of
Ramesh. There is a young Indian, a filmmaker, named Vikram who lives
nearby and gave us a ride. As he just moved there, he one night
checked out the restaurants at Ban Ganga, and went to a very nice A/C
place. After dinner he had the rest of the food backed and wanted to
leave. There, outside at the dood was an Aghori Baba, who was
obviously refused entrance to the costly A/C place. V. gave hom the
packed food, and in addition a 500 rupie note, a lot for an indian,
but just about 10 $ for us. He had it rolled inside a paper. The sadhu
then ask V to donate him a blanket, as he wanted to go to Tirupati
(pilgrimage place in the south). V told the Sadhu to look what he gave
him, whereupon he just roled the paper with the note to produce some
fire or just ashes, I don't remember completely. Then he went. No idea
if this was just a trick or a siddhi. V obviously believed it to be
true. Aghoris usuall stay at Cremation grounds (Smashans), and this is
the place wer Siddharameshs samadhi is.


==

NAVANATH / KARSIDDHESHWAR

I usualy met an old man there who had somewhat the resemblence of
Nisargadatta. He was a disciple of his, and also still met
Siddharamesh, when he was a child.As there was some discussion among
us as about the actual tradition of Nisargadatta, it is mentioned in
'I am That' that he belonged to the Navnath Samradaya, which is a
subbranch as I knew of the Naths, Sadhus who have a rather mystic
approach, and usually carry a whistle around their neck, as a symbol
of sound being the basis of creation. As a matter of fact, Aghoris are
also a kind of nath subbranch. When mentioning the Navanath to the old
man at the Samadhi, he contradicted and said that Siddharamesh
belonged to the Kadasiddheswar Sampradaya (obviously a subsect of
Navnath). He said that Siddharameshwar was the last Guru in