Salyavin808,
Thank you for your reply.
From my side, it appears that you may be responding to some reaction as to
what you think I wrote, not what I actually wrote. However, I recognize that
my writing may be unclear, muddled and that I have been unable to coherently
express my
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seerdope@... wrote :
Salyavin808,
Thank you for your reply.
From my side, it appears that you may be responding to some reaction as to
what you think I wrote, not what I actually wrote. However, I recognize that
my writing may be unclear,
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seerdope@... wrote :
Sal: ..the ability to gain knowledge of the external world by NOT looking at
it and coming up with explanatory ideas for inner visions that explain reality
would be a bitter blow to everyone toiling in laboratories to come up
It appears that at least some who seek or feel that they are have realized an
enlightened state --- and talk and walk within the broad framework of vedic /
hindu / yogic / buddhist / tantric traditions, have very limited understanding
of the types and range of karma within those traditions(1)
Enlightenment does not automatically give one instant knowledge of
Indian philosophy. That's not what it is about and why so many TM'ers
are confused.
On 12/09/2014 09:15 AM, seerd...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
It appears that at least some who seek or feel that they are have
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :
Enlightenment does not automatically give one instant knowledge of Indian
philosophy.
Suits me, I'm not remotely interested in it. I heard that its value was that
it had an analogue in particle physics but it doesn't. Just as
On 12/09/2014 01:49 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :
Enlightenment does not automatically give one instant knowledge of
Indian philosophy.
So unless it isn't a neurophysiological state, enlightenment will be
the same whether you know
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Prarabdha vs Sanchita Karma and Spiritual
Liberation (was Greatest Guru)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :
Enlightenment does not automaticallygive one instant knowledge of Indian
Sal: ..the ability to gain knowledge of the external world by NOT looking at
it and coming up with explanatory ideas for inner visions that explain reality
would be a bitter blow to everyone toiling in laboratories to come up with
fundamental physical ideas
For me, traditional
is it?
From: seerd...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 9, 2014 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Prarabdha vs Sanchita Karma and Spiritual
Liberation (was Greatest Guru)
Sal: ..the ability to gain knowledge
On 12/9/2014 1:43 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
Enlightenment does not automatically give one instant knowledge of
Indian philosophy. That's not what it is about and why so many TM'ers
are confused.
/Apparently they don't teach Buddhist logic at most universities, like
they do at UT in the Center
Enlightenment does not automatically give one instant knowledge of
Indian philosophy.
So unless it isn't a neurophysiological state, enlightenment will be
the same whether you know anything about Indian philosophy or not.
Wouldn't it?
On 12/9/2014 4:53 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
Yes.
On 12/9/2014 4:59 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
The observable world from the single cell organisms all the way to the
stars show a decided lack of karma.
Karma is defined as action or work. Everything from a single cell
organism up to and including the stars, is dependent on action.
13 matches
Mail list logo
