[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Astrology in the New Testament

2013-11-04 Thread wgm4u
Looks like Share had it right... 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

  Share and Billy,
 

 In jyotish and western astrology, the Moon is the significator of the mind and 
emotions since the Moon is the quickest moving object in the skies.  It is also 
associated with Soma, the mother and the ocean tides.
 

 In vedic literature, Soma is the plant that provided bliss in the mind.  And, 
the Moon is the ruler of Cancer, the fourth house from Aries, which pertains to 
the mother (the one who cares and nurtures us), and inward feelings of the 
chest.
 

 Further, the cycle of the Moon affects the tides of the oceans, and the 
menstrual cycles and emotions of females.
 

 Hence, in combining all of these factors, the Moon is the natural significator 
for the mind and emotions.
 

 On the other hand, Mercury, in jyotish, represents logic and reasoning.  The 
sanskrit word for Mercury is the Buddha which signifies the intelligence in 
human beings.  In Greek and Roman mythology, Mercury or Hermes is associated 
with speed in delivering the message.  Thus, a person with a strong Mercury in 
the chart will be excellent in his or her speaking, writing, and reasoning 
skills.
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 I don't think John meant the moon signified the mind, rather the moon in 
Pieces affects the mind (like all of the other signs affect each other as a 
composite whole) in an emotional, imaginative way depending on the aspects and 
other indicators.
  
 Moon in Pieces makes one very sensitive, perhaps too much depending on the 
other aspects. FWIW
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


 John, I still a bit perplexed about why jyotish calls the Moon the 
significator of the mind, rather than Mercury.
 

 
 
 On Sunday, November 3, 2013 1:10 PM, jr_esq@... jr_esq@... wrote:
 
   Share,
 

 Pisces is a dual sign and is watery by astrological definition.  If the Moon 
is placed here, the Moon becomes more sensitive since the Moon is already 
wavering and watery by nature.
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:

 Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?  Because he was born on 
December 25 which astrologically lies between the signs of Sagittarius, a 
horse, and Capricorn, the goat.  Interesting?  Bill Donohue explains more of 
his observations as follows: 

 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBgamp;list=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBglist=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t


 

 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 





 




[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Astrology in the New Testament

2013-11-04 Thread wgm4u
 
 Then *love* (not emotion, being watery) would be given over to the fire signs 
and the sun, yes? Here's a distinction between love and emotion?
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


  Share and Billy,
 

 In jyotish and western astrology, the Moon is the significator of the mind and 
emotions since the Moon is the quickest moving object in the skies.  It is also 
associated with Soma, the mother and the ocean tides.
 

 In vedic literature, Soma is the plant that provided bliss in the mind.  And, 
the Moon is the ruler of Cancer, the fourth house from Aries, which pertains to 
the mother (the one who cares and nurtures us), and inward feelings of the 
chest.
 

 Further, the cycle of the Moon affects the tides of the oceans, and the 
menstrual cycles and emotions of females.
 

 Hence, in combining all of these factors, the Moon is the natural significator 
for the mind and emotions.
 

 On the other hand, Mercury, in jyotish, represents logic and reasoning.  The 
sanskrit word for Mercury is the Buddha which signifies the intelligence in 
human beings.  In Greek and Roman mythology, Mercury or Hermes is associated 
with speed in delivering the message.  Thus, a person with a strong Mercury in 
the chart will be excellent in his or her speaking, writing, and reasoning 
skills.
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 I don't think John meant the moon signified the mind, rather the moon in 
Pieces affects the mind (like all of the other signs affect each other as a 
composite whole) in an emotional, imaginative way depending on the aspects and 
other indicators.
  
 Moon in Pieces makes one very sensitive, perhaps too much depending on the 
other aspects. FWIW
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


 John, I still a bit perplexed about why jyotish calls the Moon the 
significator of the mind, rather than Mercury.
 

 
 
 On Sunday, November 3, 2013 1:10 PM, jr_esq@... jr_esq@... wrote:
 
   Share,
 

 Pisces is a dual sign and is watery by astrological definition.  If the Moon 
is placed here, the Moon becomes more sensitive since the Moon is already 
wavering and watery by nature.
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:

 Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?  Because he was born on 
December 25 which astrologically lies between the signs of Sagittarius, a 
horse, and Capricorn, the goat.  Interesting?  Bill Donohue explains more of 
his observations as follows: 

 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBgamp;list=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBglist=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t


 

 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 





 




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Astrology in the New Testament

2013-11-04 Thread Share Long
wgm, thinking again about Jesus as a Pisces and being the embodiment of agape, 
it's interesting to me that Venus, airy in Libra and earthy in Taurus, is THE 
planet of love and exalted in Pisces, a watery sign. As for emotions, I think 
of Scorpio as deep emotions, like deep, still lakes. I think of Cancer as the 
flowing emotions, like rivers. And Pisces as expanded, more universal emotions, 
like the ocean.

Fire signs I associate more with the level or action and will to action. But 
these are just my way of having fun with all this. I'm not a trained jyotishi. 
I think John has more formal knowledge about it.





On Monday, November 4, 2013 1:55 PM, wgm4u no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
  
 
Then *love* (not emotion, being watery) would be given over to the fire signs 
and the sun, yes? Here's a distinction between love and emotion?



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


 Share and Billy,

In jyotish and western astrology, the Moon is the significator of the mind and 
emotions since the Moon is the quickest moving object in the skies.  It is also 
associated with Soma, the mother and the ocean tides.

In vedic literature, Soma is the plant that provided bliss in the mind.  And, 
the Moon is the ruler of Cancer, the fourth house from Aries, which pertains to 
the mother (the one who cares and nurtures us), and inward feelings of the 
chest.

Further, the cycle of the Moon affects the tides of the oceans, and the 
menstrual cycles and emotions of females.

Hence, in combining all of these factors, the Moon is the natural significator 
for the mind and emotions.

On the other hand, Mercury, in jyotish, represents logic and reasoning.  The 
sanskrit word for Mercury is the Buddha which signifies the intelligence in 
human beings.  In Greek and Roman mythology, Mercury or Hermes is associated 
with speed in delivering the message.  Thus, a person with a strong Mercury in 
the chart will be excellent in his or her speaking, writing, and reasoning 
skills.


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:


I don't think John meant the moon signified the mind, rather the moon in Pieces 
affects the mind (like all of the other signs affect each other as a composite 
whole) in an emotional, imaginative way depending on the aspects and other 
indicators.
 
Moon in Pieces makes one very sensitive, perhaps too much depending on the 
other aspects. FWIW

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


John, I still a bit perplexed about why jyotish calls the Moon the significator 
of the mind, rather than Mercury.





On Sunday, November 3, 2013 1:10 PM, jr_esq@... jr_esq@... wrote:
 
  
Share,

Pisces is a dual sign and is watery by astrological definition.  If the Moon is 
placed here, the Moon becomes more sensitive since the Moon is already wavering 
and watery by nature.


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:


Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?  Because he was born on 
December 25 which astrologically lies between the signs of Sagittarius, a 
horse, and Capricorn, the goat.  Interesting?  Bill Donohue explains more of 
his observations as follows:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBgamp;list=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t





RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Astrology in the New Testament

2013-11-04 Thread wgm4u
Nicely put. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 wgm, thinking again about Jesus as a Pisces and being the embodiment of agape, 
it's interesting to me that Venus, airy in Libra and earthy in Taurus, is THE 
planet of love and exalted in Pisces, a watery sign. As for emotions, I think 
of Scorpio as deep emotions, like deep, still lakes. I think of Cancer as the 
flowing emotions, like rivers. And Pisces as expanded, more universal emotions, 
like the ocean.

Fire signs I associate more with the level or action and will to action. But 
these are just my way of having fun with all this. I'm not a trained jyotishi. 
I think John has more formal knowledge about it.
 

 
 
 On Monday, November 4, 2013 1:55 PM, wgm4u no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 

 Then *love* (not emotion, being watery) would be given over to the fire signs 
and the sun, yes? Here's a distinction between love and emotion?
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


  Share and Billy,
 

 In jyotish and western astrology, the Moon is the significator of the mind and 
emotions since the Moon is the quickest moving object in the skies.  It is also 
associated with Soma, the mother and the ocean tides.
 

 In vedic literature, Soma is the plant that provided bliss in the mind.  And, 
the Moon is the ruler of Cancer, the fourth house from Aries, which pertains to 
the mother (the one who cares and nurtures us), and inward feelings of the 
chest.
 

 Further, the cycle of the Moon affects the tides of the oceans, and the 
menstrual cycles and emotions of females.
 

 Hence, in combining all of these factors, the Moon is the natural significator 
for the mind and emotions.
 

 On the other hand, Mercury, in jyotish, represents logic and reasoning.  The 
sanskrit word for Mercury is the Buddha which signifies the intelligence in 
human beings.  In Greek and Roman mythology, Mercury or Hermes is associated 
with speed in delivering the message.  Thus, a person with a strong Mercury in 
the chart will be excellent in his or her speaking, writing, and reasoning 
skills.
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 I don't think John meant the moon signified the mind, rather the moon in 
Pieces affects the mind (like all of the other signs affect each other as a 
composite whole) in an emotional, imaginative way depending on the aspects and 
other indicators.
  
 Moon in Pieces makes one very sensitive, perhaps too much depending on the 
other aspects. FWIW
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


 John, I still a bit perplexed about why jyotish calls the Moon the 
significator of the mind, rather than Mercury.
 

 
 
 On Sunday, November 3, 2013 1:10 PM, jr_esq@... jr_esq@... wrote:
 
   Share,
 

 Pisces is a dual sign and is watery by astrological definition.  If the Moon 
is placed here, the Moon becomes more sensitive since the Moon is already 
wavering and watery by nature.
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:

 Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?  Because he was born on 
December 25 which astrologically lies between the signs of Sagittarius, a 
horse, and Capricorn, the goat.  Interesting?  Bill Donohue explains more of 
his observations as follows: 

 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBgamp;list=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBglist=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t


 

 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 





 



 
 

 
 




 
 
 
 






Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Astrology in the New Testament

2013-11-03 Thread Share Long
John, one tidbit I've heard about Pisces, which is my Moon sign, is that they 
contain qualities of all the previous 11 signs. They're very sensitive, picking 
up on the vibe of others and might need to be alone just to avoid overwhelm 
from that.





On Saturday, November 2, 2013 6:01 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com jr_...@yahoo.com 
wrote:
 
  
Share,

An argument can be made for Pisces as the birth month of Jesus.  Specifically, 
Pisces is a sign owned by Jupiter, the teacher of the gods.  So, by analogy, 
Jesus was born as a teacher in this world during Kali Yuga.

Also, since Pisces is the 7th house from Virgo, he is associated with a virgin, 
which in this case is Mary, his mother.  Santos Bonacci, another astrologer, 
stated in his presentation that Pisces can be considered as the womb since the 
sign is watery.

Bill Donohue, in the video clip, further pointed out that Pisces represents the 
disciples of Jesus, who were mostly fishermen, and were tasked to become the 
fishers of men.

Lastly, Dohohue stated that Pisces represented the miracle that Jesus performed 
when he multiplied the fish and bread to feed the hungry followers during the 
Sermon on the Mount.

There are many other points, but I'll cut if off here for brevity.

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


John, one theory I've heard is that Jesus was born with Sun in Pisces. Thus the 
fish symbol for Christianity and a bunch of other stuff which I no longer 
remember. I do think Jesus embodied that universal love that can be associated 
with Pisces.





On Saturday, November 2, 2013 11:51 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
 
  
Furthermore, Jesus couldn't have been born any later than September anyway, or 
the flocks of sheep wouldn't still have been out in the fields (Luke 2:8, And 
there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch 
over their flock by night). It's pretty well established that by the 4th 
century CE, the presumptive date of Christ's birth had been moved to December 
25 in an attempt to co-opt (or compete with) the Roman solstice festival.

Seraphita wrote:


 Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?

 Pedant's Corner: it's not written. It says instead And she brought forth her 
 firstborn son, and 
 wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger. Imagine Mary 
 straddling a 
 feeding trough to give birth.



---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:


Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?  Because he was born on 
December 25 which astrologically lies between the signs of Sagittarius, a 
horse, and Capricorn, the goat.  Interesting?  Bill Donohue explains more of 
his observations as follows:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBgamp;list=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t





[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Astrology in the New Testament

2013-11-02 Thread authfriend
Furthermore, Jesus couldn't have been born any later than September anyway, or 
the flocks of sheep wouldn't still have been out in the fields (Luke 2:8 
http://www.bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Bible.show/sVerseID/24982/eVerseID/24982,
 And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping 
watch over their flock by night). It's pretty well established that by the 4th 
century CE, the presumptive date of Christ's birth had been moved to December 
25 in an attempt to co-opt (or compete with) the Roman solstice festival.
 
Seraphita wrote:
 
  Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?
 

  Pedant's Corner: it's not written. It says instead And she brought forth 
  her firstborn son, and 
  wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger. Imagine Mary 
  straddling a 
  feeding trough to give birth.

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:

 Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?  Because he was born on 
December 25 which astrologically lies between the signs of Sagittarius, a 
horse, and Capricorn, the goat.  Interesting?  Bill Donohue explains more of 
his observations as follows: 

 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBgamp;list=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBgamp;list=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t


 




[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Astrology in the New Testament

2013-11-02 Thread authfriend
Which means your first point about Sagittarius and Capricorn is null and void. 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 Judy,
 

 I would tend to agree with you on this observation.  From what I understand, 
it snows in Bethlehem during the winter months.  So, it would not have been 
practical for the Romans to make the population travel to their tribal homes 
for a census.
 

 Also, astrologically, it can be justified that Jesus was born on September 21 
or after, when the Sun is in its fall.  Hence, he was born in a stable, a place 
unsuitable for a human being and for a future King.
 

 This would imply that Jesus was born as a Cancer ascendant in jyotish 
calculation.  Why?  Because the fourth house, meaning birth home, would be in 
Libra, the sign where the Sun is debilitated.
 

 Also, this ascendant would mean that the 10th house of career or 
accomplishment is in the sign of Aries, signifying the start of spring or 
rebirth from the death of the Sun during the winter months.
 

 Therefore, it is logical that Jesus would be known in history as the Redeemer 
who rose from the dead since the Sun (the symbol of Jesus) is exalted in Aries, 
the start of spring and the renewal of life here on earth.
 

 There is more to this subject.  But I'll stop here for brevity.
 

 

  
 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote:

 Furthermore, Jesus couldn't have been born any later than September anyway, or 
the flocks of sheep wouldn't still have been out in the fields (Luke 2:8 
http://www.bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Bible.show/sVerseID/24982/eVerseID/24982,
 And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping 
watch over their flock by night). It's pretty well established that by the 4th 
century CE, the presumptive date of Christ's birth had been moved to December 
25 in an attempt to co-opt (or compete with) the Roman solstice festival.
 
Seraphita wrote:
 
  Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?
 

  Pedant's Corner: it's not written. It says instead And she brought forth 
  her firstborn son, and 
  wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger. Imagine Mary 
  straddling a 
  feeding trough to give birth.
 

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:

 Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?  Because he was born on 
December 25 which astrologically lies between the signs of Sagittarius, a 
horse, and Capricorn, the goat.  Interesting?  Bill Donohue explains more of 
his observations as follows: 

 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBgamp;list=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBgamp;list=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t


 


 




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Astrology in the New Testament

2013-11-02 Thread Share Long
John, one theory I've heard is that Jesus was born with Sun in Pisces. Thus the 
fish symbol for Christianity and a bunch of other stuff which I no longer 
remember. I do think Jesus embodied that universal love that can be associated 
with Pisces.





On Saturday, November 2, 2013 11:51 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com 
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
 
  
Furthermore, Jesus couldn't have been born any later than September anyway, or 
the flocks of sheep wouldn't still have been out in the fields (Luke 2:8, And 
there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch 
over their flock by night). It's pretty well established that by the 4th 
century CE, the presumptive date of Christ's birth had been moved to December 
25 in an attempt to co-opt (or compete with) the Roman solstice festival.

Seraphita wrote:


 Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?

 Pedant's Corner: it's not written. It says instead And she brought forth her 
 firstborn son, and 
 wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger. Imagine Mary 
 straddling a 
 feeding trough to give birth.



---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:


Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?  Because he was born on 
December 25 which astrologically lies between the signs of Sagittarius, a 
horse, and Capricorn, the goat.  Interesting?  Bill Donohue explains more of 
his observations as follows:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBgamp;list=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t



RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Astrology in the New Testament

2013-11-02 Thread jr_esq
Share,
 

 An argument can be made for Pisces as the birth month of Jesus.  Specifically, 
Pisces is a sign owned by Jupiter, the teacher of the gods.  So, by analogy, 
Jesus was born as a teacher in this world during Kali Yuga.
 

 Also, since Pisces is the 7th house from Virgo, he is associated with a 
virgin, which in this case is Mary, his mother.  Santos Bonacci, another 
astrologer, stated in his presentation that Pisces can be considered as the 
womb since the sign is watery.
 

 Bill Donohue, in the video clip, further pointed out that Pisces represents 
the disciples of Jesus, who were mostly fishermen, and were tasked to become 
the fishers of men.
 

 Lastly, Dohohue stated that Pisces represented the miracle that Jesus 
performed when he multiplied the fish and bread to feed the hungry followers 
during the Sermon on the Mount.
 

 There are many other points, but I'll cut if off here for brevity.
 

  
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:

 John, one theory I've heard is that Jesus was born with Sun in Pisces. Thus 
the fish symbol for Christianity and a bunch of other stuff which I no longer 
remember. I do think Jesus embodied that universal love that can be associated 
with Pisces.
 

 
 
 On Saturday, November 2, 2013 11:51 AM, authfriend@... authfriend@... 
wrote:
 
   Furthermore, Jesus couldn't have been born any later than September anyway, 
or the flocks of sheep wouldn't still have been out in the fields (Luke 2:8 
http://www.bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Bible.show/sVerseID/24982/eVerseID/24982,
 And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping 
watch over their flock by night). It's pretty well established that by the 4th 
century CE, the presumptive date of Christ's birth had been moved to December 
25 in an attempt to co-opt (or compete with) the Roman solstice festival.
 
Seraphita wrote:
 
  Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?
 

  Pedant's Corner: it's not written. It says instead And she brought forth 
  her firstborn son, and 
  wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger. Imagine Mary 
  straddling a 
  feeding trough to give birth.

 

---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote:

 Why was it written that Jesus was born in a manger?  Because he was born on 
December 25 which astrologically lies between the signs of Sagittarius, a 
horse, and Capricorn, the goat.  Interesting?  Bill Donohue explains more of 
his observations as follows: 

 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBgamp;list=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6j6DwBWBglist=PL4HZ228v9duPReHJuT6prrAUc9BzFEo_t