[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Judy Stein#39;s Definition Of What Constitutes A LIE
Thanks, Ann, I trust most of the posters here and or enjoy their posts. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote: Share, take a moment and have a care. You are moving into some dangerous territory for yourself as an individual and as a human being. Be careful that you do not use the mistaken and erroneous notions of your faux friend Barry and your well-intentioned but not-really-helping-you associate Feste to launch into this head space of yours. I don't think it is a healthy one or somewhere that is characterized by what is real or what is true. ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote: Judy first ran her number on me on Sept 9, 2012. She said that I did such and such in my post to RWC. She did not qualify with in my opinion or it sounds like or even I think. Of course she didn't ask me if I was doing such and such. She just declared that I did such and such as if she could see inside my head and know, without error, what I had been thinking and feeling. I had never experienced someone communicating like that. It was like a foreign language and as such, I didn't even know how to respond. I've come to think that no matter what anyone says, Judy will not change. In fact, I've come to think that she likes it when she has to fight with everyone. On Saturday, November 30, 2013 8:19 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote: Because, despite my nearly two decades of trying to educate people -- first on alt.meditation.transcendental and now on Fairfield Life -- as to what a LIE is, I find many of them still confused. Because it is my God-given duty and dharma to be the Keeper Of The Truth, I felt I should write a short manifesto explaining to these retards what exactly a LIE is, so they can recognize when they're doing it, and thus LYING. * Disagreeing with me on *any* subject about which I am posing as an expert -- even if they have experienced the phenomenon or SoC or events being discussed and I have only read about them or heard about them -- is a lie. I am RIGHT, and they are WRONG, and to be WRONG is to LIE. * Holding a different opinion of me, my behavior, and the motives for my behavior than I hold is a LIE. I *know* The Truth about myself, my behavior, and my motives, and if they hold a different view, and express it despite my corrections, they're LYING. * Saying something negative about someone I regard as a friend (even though I've never met them and never will) or as an ally (the enemy of my enemy is my friend) is a LIE. I will defend these allies to the death, and make excuses for *their* LIES with the same vehemence with which I put down the LIES of those who persecute them. * Saying something positive about someone I view negatively is by definition a LIE. The very fact that they don't see this person the way I see them reveals how REEAALLLY REEAALLLY STOOOPID they are, and how smart and superior I am. If they persist in viewing these hooligans positively in the face of my corrections, they're LYING, pure and simple. * Suggesting that *I* have LIED is even more by definition a LIE, because as we all know, I DON'T LIE. I have declared this, so it is TRUE, and never to be contradicted. I am the ONLY person on this forum who cares about The Truth, as well as the ONLY person who *knows* The Truth. Challenge this at your own peril, you LIARS! * Claiming that I persecute or harass people by posting literally hundreds of posts ragging on them per year -- year after year -- is a LIE. I am merely pursuing my dharma, which is to be the Keeper Of The Truth. They *deserve* my invective and my continued attention; I am trying to *help* them by revealing to them what big, fat LIARS they are, and trying to help them see The Truth. Which is that they should always agree with me, of course. * Whenever I criticize or make negative comments about someone, these things should be viewed as The Truth that they are. Challenging them or disagreeing with them is by definition a LIE. Furthermore, when I say these things about someone else, that person *owes me* a point-by-point response to all the things I *know* about them because these things are The Truth. When someone says something negative about me, I owe them nothing but to call them what they are -- a LIAR. See my responses to Richard for the template. * Laughing at me and my behavior is a particularly insidious form of LIE. I *know* The Truth, About Almost Everything, and so my words must be treated with the level of respect and awe I expect. Anything less is a kind of implicit LIE, a suggestion that I don't really *know* the things I claim to know, and that I'm just spouting opinion, like everyone else here. I am NOT like everyone else here; I'm better, smarter, and always RIGHT. Dispute this in any way, and you're LYING. * Finally, writing something and attributing it to me as if I had written it -- no matter how
[FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Judy Stein#39;s Definition Of What Constitutes A LIE
Yet another thoroughly and deliberately dishonest post from Barry, as anyone who has followed my posts over the years knows. I have plenty of interesting things going on in my mundane and spiritual lives. They are not, however, things that I would want to write about on this forum, for various reasons, including some that should be obvious. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: turq, I'm agin it on all levels. And I don't think Ms. Stein really knows what she hopes to accomplish by all this harassing and name calling. The payoff for her is attention. She's never had the intelligence, creativity, or humanity to gain it from any means other than getting people to argue with her, so she continues to use the methods that have worked for her in the past. If she had interesting things going on in her mundane life, she'd write about them. If she had interesting things going on in her spiritual life, she'd write about them. If she had anything to *contribute*, she'd be contributing. Instead, she picks enemies and stalks them. Go figure. I sure hope the attention she feels she gets from this is worth it. Seems to me it would have been SO much easier just to be interesting. On Saturday, November 30, 2013 10:31 AM, TurquoiseB turquoiseb@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Judy, what's the action step? What is it that you'd like to see happen? How do you feel -- personally, emotionally, and morally -- about waterboarding? :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@ wrote: See, this is what happens when a group tolerates dishonesty. When there are no sanctions against it, not even disapproval, even the weaker members start using dishonesty to justify themselves, as Share does here. The more people who feel safe being dishonest, the more a mythical, false story about the group and its members and interactions takes shape and displaces the real one. History, as they say, is written by the winners, so those who care about having an accurate history need to ensure the liars don't win. Here's the post in question; decide for yourselves whether Share's description of it below is truthful (note the many qualifying phrases that Share flatly denies it contained--including, ironically, it sounds like, which she specifically mentions below): http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/\ http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/FairfieldLife/conversations/messages/\ \ 319521 Plus which, as I've pointed out before, Share had gotten on my bad side well before this. Share lied: Judy first ran her number on me on Sept 9, 2012. She said that I did such and such in my post to RWC. She did not qualify with in my opinion or it sounds like or even I think. Of course she didn't ask me if I was doing such and such. She just declared that I did such and such as if she could see inside my head and know, without error, what I had been thinking and feeling. I had never experienced someone communicating like that. It was like a foreign language and as such, I didn't even know how to respond. I've come to think that no matter what anyone says, Judy will not change. In fact, I've come to think that she likes it when she has to fight with everyone.
[FairfieldLife] RE: Re: Judy Stein#39;s Definition Of What Constitutes A LIE
Now that was pretty funny. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote: Some people on FFL forget it's just a chat group. That should be the mantra of Fairfield Life: IT'S JUST A CHAT GROUP The TM advanced technique version would be: GET OVER IT, NAMAH, NAMAH http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkghttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkg http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkg :-)
[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: Judy Stein#39;s Definition Of What Constitutes A LIE
It's interesting, I put up that Barry's Fantasy Image of Judy photo years ago to make a little fun of him, but he apparently took it quite seriously and almost immediately became obsessed with the image, reposting it over and over and even fantasizing it as a crop circle. By this time, it seems to have taken over his brain. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: Barry, You have probably spent more time analyzing, responding to, and just plain day-dreaming, about Judy, than I have about my wife, and we live under the same roof. Scary shit, though I will definitely leave it to you, as I'd rather spend my time in Reality - no offense. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote: Because, despite my nearly two decades of trying to educate people -- first on alt.meditation.transcendental and now on Fairfield Life -- as to what a LIE is, I find many of them still confused. Because it is my God-given duty and dharma to be the Keeper Of The Truth, I felt I should write a short manifesto explaining to these retards what exactly a LIE is, so they can recognize when they're doing it, and thus LYING. * Disagreeing with me on *any* subject about which I am posing as an expert -- even if they have experienced the phenomenon or SoC or events being discussed and I have only read about them or heard about them -- is a lie. I am RIGHT, and they are WRONG, and to be WRONG is to LIE. * Holding a different opinion of me, my behavior, and the motives for my behavior than I hold is a LIE. I *know* The Truth about myself, my behavior, and my motives, and if they hold a different view, and express it despite my corrections, they're LYING. * Saying something negative about someone I regard as a friend (even though I've never met them and never will) or as an ally (the enemy of my enemy is my friend) is a LIE. I will defend these allies to the death, and make excuses for *their* LIES with the same vehemence with which I put down the LIES of those who persecute them. * Saying something positive about someone I view negatively is by definition a LIE. The very fact that they don't see this person the way I see them reveals how REEAALLLY REEAALLLY STOOOPID they are, and how smart and superior I am. If they persist in viewing these hooligans positively in the face of my corrections, they're LYING, pure and simple. * Suggesting that *I* have LIED is even more by definition a LIE, because as we all know, I DON'T LIE. I have declared this, so it is TRUE, and never to be contradicted. I am the ONLY person on this forum who cares about The Truth, as well as the ONLY person who *knows* The Truth. Challenge this at your own peril, you LIARS! * Claiming that I persecute or harass people by posting literally hundreds of posts ragging on them per year -- year after year -- is a LIE. I am merely pursuing my dharma, which is to be the Keeper Of The Truth. They *deserve* my invective and my continued attention; I am trying to *help* them by revealing to them what big, fat LIARS they are, and trying to help them see The Truth. Which is that they should always agree with me, of course. * Whenever I criticize or make negative comments about someone, these things should be viewed as The Truth that they are. Challenging them or disagreeing with them is by definition a LIE. Furthermore, when I say these things about someone else, that person *owes me* a point-by-point response to all the things I *know* about them because these things are The Truth. When someone says something negative about me, I owe them nothing but to call them what they are -- a LIAR. See my responses to Richard for the template. * Laughing at me and my behavior is a particularly insidious form of LIE. I *know* The Truth, About Almost Everything, and so my words must be treated with the level of respect and awe I expect. Anything less is a kind of implicit LIE, a suggestion that I don't really *know* the things I claim to know, and that I'm just spouting opinion, like everyone else here. I am NOT like everyone else here; I'm better, smarter, and always RIGHT. Dispute this in any way, and you're LYING. * Finally, writing something and attributing it to me as if I had written it -- no matter how accurate it is -- is by definition a LIE. Ignore the fact that I have failed to condemn several of my allies (for example, Robin, Ravi, Jimbo, and others) when they have done this to other people. They were *justified* in doing this to these other LIARS, because *I DON'T LIKE THEM*. But when someone does this to me, it's a LIE of the basest sort. :-) [ For the record, the above was *not* written by Judy Stein. It was written in a Dutch pub just for fun by someone channeling her, and saying what she would say if she were actually capable of telling The Truth she claims to care so much about. ]
