[FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I miss the days when politicians could still think fast...

2013-10-07 Thread awoelflebater













Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I miss the days when politicians could still think fast...

2013-10-07 Thread Richard J. Williams

It didn't take very long for this thread to go down in flames. Go figure.

On 10/7/2013 8:43 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:


Anartaxius sez:


 I do not think Barry is talking about the potential
 problem not being serious; rather the players in this
 battle on each side have delusional versions of reality
 running in their skulls, which keeps the house of cards
 of the international financial in a state of dynamic
 turmoil. Since its stability is based on perception
 of how secure it is, we really cannot predict when
 the thing will collapse, or even if it will.

Exactly. Plus, the delusional versions of reality
running in their skulls have to do not only with
economics, but with each other. This whole fiasco
seems to have more to do with long-term grudges
behind held by petty people than with any sense of
reality. The GOPers *hate* Obama and are driven by
a need to try to take away his biggest success (that
is, his biggest success after beating the pants off
of them in the elections).

That's why I see American politics these days as an
extension of the pettiness we see on FFL. Or vice-
versa. It's a mindset of vindictive pettiness in
which the need to get one's enemy rules, and
in which nothing else matters. Certainly not the
welfare of others. It's an almost *entirely*
ego-driven scenario, with the egos so inflamed
and out of control that they have no room in
their tiny brains to contain both the hatred
that consumes them and the ability to care for
or act in the interest of other people at the
same time. It's just constant Orwellian
repetition of a single word: Hate, Hate, Hate! :-)

Once again Barry has insisted on talking about himself ad infinitum as 
if we were interested or didn't already know exactly how he rolls. OK 
Barry, we get it. You are an ego-driven, inflamed out of control tiny 
brain that contains hatred, is consumed by it without the ability to 
care for or act in the interest of other people. You are filled with 
hate, hate, hate! Now, please, tell us something we don't know.






[FairfieldLife] RE: Re: I miss the days when politicians could still think fast...

2013-10-06 Thread jr_esq













[FairfieldLife] RE: RE: I miss the days when politicians could still think fast...

2013-10-06 Thread anartaxius













Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: I miss the days when politicians could still think fast...

2013-10-06 Thread Bhairitu

On 10/06/2013 12:35 PM, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote:


I do not think Barry is talking about the potential problem not being 
serious; rather the players in this battle on each side have 
delusional versions of reality running in their skulls, which keeps 
the house of cards of the international financial in a state of 
dynamic turmoil. Since its stability is based on /perception/ of how 
secure it is, we really cannot predict when the thing will collapse, 
or even if it will.





How 'bout Greece, Spain and Brazil?

My thoughts on this are politicians want to be reelected, they want to 
provide for their constituents well being as well as for themselves, 
and there is not really enough money, based on currencies' equivalent 
value in economic production of the countries involved to do this. 
Also these politicians disagree as to what benefits accrue to whom. To 
provide services and provide for emergencies and security, countries 
generate debt. As Alexander Hamilton pointed out, proper management of 
debt can keep a country wealthy or have the appearance of wealth, 
which is how the U.S. managed after the War of Independence. The 
question here is, has the debt crossed some line where this system of 
perception of wealth and stability comes unglued?




After the Civil War.  The wealthy wanted their pet golden goose the 
Transcontinental Railroad to get built.  Also look up Santa Clara vs 
Southern Pacific Railroad.  That's really when corporations got power 
they shouldn't have.




Not just for the United States but for all countries engaged in 
borrowing or simply printing paper money to meet the demands that have 
been put in place. As most currencies now are not based on some 
physical value like gold, their value is far more in the eye of the 
beholder than ever before. As other countries also have floating 
currencies, no one really wants to rock the boat, but it appears to be 
very fragile and we have no idea what might bring it down.



The U.S. has some $3 trillion income from taxes, and some $18 trillion 
in debt. Like if you make $50,000 a year but have $300,000 in debt, 
although at interest rates much lower than charge cards, countries 
don't have to pay out so much as an individual as a percent of debt. 
The U.S. has some $70 trillion in future obligations that are not 
funded. The math is bleak. According to generally accepted accounting 
principles, the U.S. is broke. But in perception it seems much 
stronger because of free floating currency, a country has a certain 
leeway in how much it can fudge the ledgers and still, in relation to 
its neighbours, be relatively stable. If all other countries were on, 
say, the gold standard, the U.S. would be sunk, but because they are 
not, they have to play along, fingers crossed.




Obama got them to play along at the last G (whatever the number was) 
which even appalled Paul Krugman because it puts the US in pertpertual 
depression.




Politicians seem to want to avoid talking about the actual problem in 
terms that correspond to reality in the sense that ideas about the 
world, while at best are crude approximations of human experience, can 
have practical utility in dealing with world as do mature scientific 
theories. Economics has not been horribly scientific, and political 
ideologies are nearly insane when it comes to economics.


Many have predicted hyperinflation, which has not come, though the 
U.S. has been increasingly fudging its measures of inflation for the 
last 34 years, which reduces payouts for Social Security etc. The 
inflation rate is currently listed as about 2% per year, though the 
way the U.S. government calculated inflation prior to 1980 shows an 
inflation rate of about 9% per year which corresponds to what most 
people experience these days.


To avoid raising prices they just give you less for the same price. That 
2% inflation rate is bogus.




Because the world in our heads governed by our concepts determines our 
reality as a kind of overlay on raw sensory perception, the practical 
correspondence of those concepts to reality will determine how well we 
fare here. We do not have to worry. Whatever happens, reality 
/*always*/ wins. The result might not feel so good though.