On 3/9/2014 6:08 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote:
Let's call our new flavor Prairie Doc lightn-mint.
>
That's a start. Thanks.
What most TMers are concerned with is the lineage of SBS, a siddha
tantric yogin from the Saraswati branch of the Shankaracharya
sampradaya, which has its headquarters
On 3/11/2014 11:20 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
> You don't seem to notice that I speak in terms of MY tantric tradition
> and often state "in my tradition" or "my path."
>
Speaking of tantra paths, SBS followed the Shree Vudya Tantric
Tradition, and so did both MMY and the Karpatri Swami. The Shree Vid
On 3/11/2014 11:20 AM, Bhairitu wrote:
> One of the books my guru recommended is L.R. Chawhdri's book
> "Practicals of Mantras and Tantras". Despite it's poor English there
> is quite a bit of information there. But there is a caveat, it won't
> make much sense to anyone but an initiate.
>
Th
So he only knows that particular path then. Look Willy, I know you just
enjoy being an ass or troll here but you're earning bad karma by posting
misinformation. Maharishi once said "the wise should not confuse the
ignorant." A more relevant statement might have been "beware the
ignorant confu
The late Professor Kinsley was a great Sri Vidya initiate who spent years in
India at the feet of realized masters. For any Shakti or Devi admirer this is a
must read , most comprehensive explanation of each of the ten Mahavidyas.
The Ten Mahavidyas:
Kali
Tara
Tripurasundari
Bhuwaneshwari
Tripu
So who initiated Kinsley into tantra and what was his tradition?
On 03/10/2014 04:04 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
On 3/10/2014 12:02 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> So I guess with your crude metaphor you believe are having sex with
> Saraswati whenever you practice TM.
>
Saraswati is already married a
On 3/10/2014 12:02 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> So I guess with your crude metaphor you believe are having sex with
> Saraswati whenever you practice TM.
>
Saraswati is already married and unites with her husband, Brahma. In
Tantric Yoga, Purusha is totally separate from the prakriti. Buddhists
belie
On 3/10/2014 12:02 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> You unite with shakti when you meditate.
>
In Tantra Yoga, Shakti is God, which is totally separate from the
prakriti, so there will never be a union between the jiva and the
Purusha. Tantra Yoga does affirm the existence of god, but in Yoga this
god is
On 3/10/2014 12:02 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> Yoga means "union".
>
Yoga means the *isolation* of the Purusha from the prakriti - not a
"union" of the two. The word "yoga" is derived from the root word yuj,
which means to harness, pertaining to the act of harnessing. Thus we
read in Rig Veda of hor
On 3/10/2014 12:58 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> Furthermore, not everyone has the karma for marriage.
>
You are only going to get as much enlightenment as you are going to get.
So, just enjoy - that's tantra. Maybe in your next incarnation you will
meet your soul mate - maybe even tomorrow. Who knows?
Furthermore, not everyone has the karma for marriage. Astrologically
this is often indicated by a weak 7th lord.
On 03/10/2014 06:21 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
On 3/9/2014 10:01 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> So porn stars are all enlightened? Go figure.
>
Why not? Apparently your tantra teacher an
You take things way too literally. Yoga means "union". You unite with
shakti when you meditate. So I guess with your crude metaphor you
believe are having sex with Saraswati whenever you practice TM.
On 03/10/2014 06:21 AM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
On 3/9/2014 10:01 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
>
On 3/9/2014 10:01 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> So porn stars are all enlightened? Go figure.
>
Why not? Apparently your tantra teacher and the historical Buddha were
both married. Would that prevent anyone from being enlightened?
So porn stars are all enlightened? Go figure.
On 03/09/2014 06:49 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
On 3/9/2014 8:26 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> Total Texas bullshit!
>
Try it - you'd probably like it. Having a sexual partner is the most fun
on the planet. How do you think I got enlightened?
On 3/9/2014 8:26 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> Total Texas bullshit!
>
Try it - you'd probably like it. Having a sexual partner is the most fun
on the planet. How do you think I got enlightened?
Total Texas bullshit!
On 03/09/2014 06:16 PM, Richard J. Williams wrote:
On 3/9/2014 2:18 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> Tantra is pretty much the way to go for a householder because it has
> centuries of householders practicing it. Wanna be a holy man? Then be
> born the next lifetime in India. A lot o
On 3/9/2014 2:18 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
> Tantra is pretty much the way to go for a householder because it has
> centuries of householders practicing it. Wanna be a holy man? Then be
> born the next lifetime in India. A lot of stupid westerners want to
> be a "holy man" but that doesn't integrat
"Class, today we are going to learn a bunch of big words and the proper way to
show love to someone"
Oh so right! Let's call our new flavor Prairie Doc lightn-mint.
Is them words big enuff?
The point of maithuna practice (sexual-union yoga) is to assist in the ascend
of the prana-shaktis up the spine, whether that is understood to be a
collection of prana-s gathered into the spinal axis or of the ascent of the
mula-prana known as kundalini-shakti at the base of the spine. The Buddh
TM is tantra. But Indians think tantra is about black magic and
westerners think it is about sex. Both are ignorant ideas. Tantra is
about mantras, yantras and tantric rituals. So many articles unless the
writer was an initiate are just ignorance.
Tantra is pretty much the way to go for a h
Tantra strikes me as another stupid attempt to put the cart before the horse.
People who get sucked into these practices, somehow think that by being
artificially aware of some aspect of fucking, they will advance themselves
spiritually. The practice of first gaining deep silence, and then integ
21 matches
Mail list logo
