[FairfieldLife] Re: Cow Farts Being Studied for Global Warming
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In more important news of the day: *http://tinyurl.com/6pzntt * Yes - little know fact of the day - C02 is not by any means the primary greenhouse gas. The politicized theory of AGW (anthropocentric global warming warming i.e. caused by us brutes) actually doesn't get off the ground without supporting speculations/dodgy computer modelling about positive feedbacks. Methane (cow human farts and other stuff in no particular order) is way more powerful than CO2. And the ONE that rules them all is water vapour. A widespread adoption of a veggie diet may result in less cow farts - but would it be made up for in human farts? Do we need a peer-reviewed paper?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Cow Farts Being Studied for Global Warming
Note to Bhairitu: This is a double-header...not only is the headline hilarious, so is the photo...no reason not to share both with the FFL public... Cow farts collected in plastic tank for global warming study [A cow stands in her pen at the National Institute of Agricultural Technology in Castelar, near Buenos Aires. Argentine scientists are taking a novel approach to studying global warming, strapping plastic tanks to the backs of cows to collect methane] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2007/07/09/eacow\ 109.xml
[FairfieldLife] Re: Cow Farts Being Studied for Global Warming
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: In more important news of the day: *http://tinyurl.com/6pzntt * Yes - little know fact of the day - C02 is not by any means the primary greenhouse gas. The politicized theory of AGW (anthropocentric global warming warming i.e. caused by us brutes) actually doesn't get off the ground without supporting speculations/dodgy computer modelling about positive feedbacks. Methane (cow human farts and other stuff in no particular order) is way more powerful than CO2. And the ONE that rules them all is water vapour. A widespread adoption of a veggie diet may result in less cow farts - but would it be made up for in human farts? Do we need a peer- reviewed paper? I voluteer to start collecting farts for science. But I insist that the collection bag be color-coordinated with my shoes.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Cow Farts Being Studied for Global Warming
Richard M wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In more important news of the day: *http://tinyurl.com/6pzntt * Yes - little know fact of the day - C02 is not by any means the primary greenhouse gas. The politicized theory of AGW (anthropocentric global warming warming i.e. caused by us brutes) actually doesn't get off the ground without supporting speculations/dodgy computer modelling about positive feedbacks. Methane (cow human farts and other stuff in no particular order) is way more powerful than CO2. And the ONE that rules them all is water vapour. A widespread adoption of a veggie diet may result in less cow farts - but would it be made up for in human farts? Do we need a peer-reviewed paper? You definitely have a point there. :D
[FairfieldLife] Re: Cow Farts Being Studied for Global Warming
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: In more important news of the day: *http://tinyurl.com/6pzntt * Yes - little know fact of the day - C02 is not by any means the primary greenhouse gas. The politicized theory of AGW (anthropocentric global warming warming i.e. caused by us brutes) actually doesn't get off the ground without supporting speculations/dodgy computer modelling about positive feedbacks. Methane (cow human farts and other stuff in no particular order) is way more powerful than CO2. And the ONE that rules them all is water vapour. A widespread adoption of a veggie diet may result in less cow farts - but would it be made up for in human farts? Do we need a peer- reviewed paper? A special parliamentary committee should be convened.
