[FairfieldLife] Re: Cultural history of vegetarianism

2007-01-28 Thread Jason Spock
 
In the Pre-Civilisation days 10,000 years ago, Canibalism was rampant 
throughout the World.  Tribes living in isolation were more likely to kill and 
eat anyone not a part of their tribe.
   
Then as Settlements became more organised and defined, Human Sacrifices 
were rampant all over the World.  Sacrifical Human blood flowed like rivers in 
Central American and South American tribes.  Evidence for Human Sacrifices 
exists even in Ancient Europe.
   
Then as Settlements grew into Civilisations, Slavery and Slave-trading 
became rampant and other Superstitions began to take hold.
   
Witch hunting in Europe,  Female Circumscision in Middle-east and N-Africa, 
 Sati and Devadasi system in india,  Foot-binding in China,  etc etc.
   
Today, Pollution of the Eco-System,  Destruction of Forests,  Large scale 
Corruption,  Mis-information and False Probaganda in media,  etc etc
   
Therefore, We can see a gradual refinement and Purification in Human 
Consciousness and Human Evolution.  Maharishi says Heaven on Earth is 
possible.

bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:53:32 -
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cultural history of vegetarianism
   
   
   If history teaches us anything, it's that today's habit may be 
tomorrow's abomination. What people saw as a matter of course in the 
streets of 17th-century London -- rich men beating their servants, 
crowds gathered in a festival mood to watch bloody executions -- 
would horrify the pedestrian of 2007. Morality, too, has a history, 
but the people of any given period usually don't see it that way. 
They think that they already have a pretty solid understanding of 
right and wrong (even if they find it difficult to be virtuous) and 
rarely imagine that future generations might view them as 
unenlightened at best and depraved at worst. 

Activists, on the other hand, know different. They count on the 
evolution of morality. Recently, Adam Hochschild's fascinating Bury 
the Chains chronicled the means by which a group of committed 18th-
century idealists convinced their fellow citizens in Britain and 
America that slavery was an intolerable wrong. It wasn't easy, and it 
didn't happen overnight. Some people of that era thought that slavery 
was lamentable but intractable; others found it easy to justify an 
institution that brought them profits and comfort. Still others -- 
the majority, perhaps -- didn't give it much thought at all, as they 
sweetened their tea with sugar produced at brutal slave plantations 
on islands far, far away. 

For this reason, even an omnivore should find an intellectual 
history of vegetarianism interesting. We, like the people of the 
early 1800s, could be living through a period of slow but profound 
ideological change. To the people of their own time, men like 
Granville Sharp and Thomas Clarkson -- early abolitionists and the 
founders of the first human rights movement -- seemed as impractical, 
as demanding, as self-righteous and as obsessed as many animal rights 
activists seem to us today. In the future, right-thinking people 
might look back at us meat eaters with the same disapproval we heap 
on those who considered slavery acceptable 200 years ago. 

http://www.salon. com/books/ review/2007/ 01/25/stuart/ index.html
   

 
-
Never Miss an Email
Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started!

[FairfieldLife] Re: Cultural history of vegetarianism

2007-01-28 Thread cardemaister
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
 In the Pre-Civilisation days 10,000 years ago, Canibalism was
rampant throughout the World.  Tribes living in isolation were more
likely to kill and eat anyone not a part of their tribe.


http://www.susiluola.fi/eng/index_eng.php

:0



[FairfieldLife] Re: Cultural history of vegetarianism

2007-01-28 Thread Jason Spock
 
In the Pre-Civilisation days 10,000 years ago, Canibalism was rampant 
throughout the World.  Tribes living in isolation were more likely to kill and 
eat anyone not a part of their tribe.
   
Then as Settlements became more organised and defined, Human Sacrifices 
were rampant all over the World.  Sacrifical Human blood flowed like rivers in 
Central American and South American tribes.  Evidence for Human Sacrifices 
exists even in Ancient Europe.
   
Then as Settlements grew into Civilisations, Slavery and Slave-trading 
became rampant and other Superstitions began to take hold.
   
Witch hunting in Europe,  Female Circumscision in Middle-east and N-Africa, 
 Sati and Devadasi system in india,  Foot-binding in China,  etc etc.
   
Today, Pollution of the Eco-System,  Destruction of Forests,  Large scale 
Corruption,  Mis-information and False Probaganda in media,  etc etc
   
Therefore, We can see a gradual refinement and Purification in Human 
Consciousness and Human Evolution.  Maharishi says Heaven on Earth is 
possible.

bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:53:32 -
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Cultural history of vegetarianism
   
   
   If history teaches us anything, it's that today's habit may be 
tomorrow's abomination. What people saw as a matter of course in the 
streets of 17th-century London -- rich men beating their servants, 
crowds gathered in a festival mood to watch bloody executions -- 
would horrify the pedestrian of 2007. Morality, too, has a history, 
but the people of any given period usually don't see it that way. 
They think that they already have a pretty solid understanding of 
right and wrong (even if they find it difficult to be virtuous) and 
rarely imagine that future generations might view them as 
unenlightened at best and depraved at worst. 

Activists, on the other hand, know different. They count on the 
evolution of morality. Recently, Adam Hochschild's fascinating Bury 
the Chains chronicled the means by which a group of committed 18th-
century idealists convinced their fellow citizens in Britain and 
America that slavery was an intolerable wrong. It wasn't easy, and it 
didn't happen overnight. Some people of that era thought that slavery 
was lamentable but intractable; others found it easy to justify an 
institution that brought them profits and comfort. Still others -- 
the majority, perhaps -- didn't give it much thought at all, as they 
sweetened their tea with sugar produced at brutal slave plantations 
on islands far, far away. 

For this reason, even an omnivore should find an intellectual 
history of vegetarianism interesting. We, like the people of the 
early 1800s, could be living through a period of slow but profound 
ideological change. To the people of their own time, men like 
Granville Sharp and Thomas Clarkson -- early abolitionists and the 
founders of the first human rights movement -- seemed as impractical, 
as demanding, as self-righteous and as obsessed as many animal rights 
activists seem to us today. In the future, right-thinking people 
might look back at us meat eaters with the same disapproval we heap 
on those who considered slavery acceptable 200 years ago. 

http://www.salon. com/books/ review/2007/ 01/25/stuart/ index.html
   
   

 
-
Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question 
on Yahoo! Answers.