--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > Sam Harris has posted a second follow up to his post on his
> > own blog about free will (the link to which tartbrain originally
> > posted on this for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb
>
> I was suggesting that I have a similar Bzzt reaction
> when seeing Harris claim that there is no free will and
> no ab
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> On 06/08/2011 07:53 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
> > Sam Harris has posted a second follow up to his post on his own blog about
> > free will (the link to which tartbrain originally posted on this forum). In
> > this post he takes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > As I have suggested about other believers in the
> > lack of free will here (and that they have failed
> > to reply to), if they are so convinced that there
> > is no free
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Sam Harris has posted a second follow up to his post on his
> > > own blog about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
> wrote:
> >
> > Sam Harris has posted a second follow up to his post on his
> > own blog about free will (the link to which tartbrain originally
> > posted on this foru
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius"
wrote:
>
> Sam Harris has posted a second follow up to his post on his
> own blog about free will (the link to which tartbrain originally
> posted on this forum). In this post he takes a slightly different
> tack on the subject:
>
thx for posting this...The mental operations mentioned can simply be replaced
by terms such as higher dimensional, more subtle, etc; in which case there's
still no change in the strength of the Harris arguments.
...
imo - some other line of attack should be found by free will advocates; but I
ha
