-0400Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY,
eh?Of course he's lived in a country where prostitution is legal for how long now? No need for a lifemate, just cash and a place to go. On May 16, 2006, at 10:40 AM, sparaig wrote: I see no contradiction between his public
. Moriarty would reform himself and act more in tune with the Total-Natural-Law..?? Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:29:15 -0500Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?you can be pregnant and then have a miscarriage. Jason Spock at [EMAIL
practices TM, will it make him
even more brilliant criminal..??!!
Or, Prof. Moriarty would reform himself and act more in tune
with the Total-Natural-Law..??
Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:29:15 -0500
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what celibacy has to do with being a teacher;
is this a Catholic thing? or something?
Theoretically, it should not matter. What might matter
is 1) whether the teacher says one thing in public and
in tune
with the Total-Natural-Law..??
Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:29:15 -0500
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
you can be pregnant and then have a miscarriage.
Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha Ha, My
, will it make him
even more brilliant criminal..??!!
Or, Prof. Moriarty would reform himself and act more in
tune
with the Total-Natural-Law..??
Rick Archer fairfieldlife@ wrote:
Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 18:29:15 -0500
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm not sure what celibacy has to do with being a teacher; is this
a Catholic thing? or something?
There's a very long tradition, possibly based on
experience, that when sexual energy is sublimated,
it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
babajii_99@ wrote:
I'm not sure what celibacy has to do with being a teacher;
is this a Catholic thing? or something?
Theoretically, it should not matter.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason Spock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sir. Rick Archer, are you implying that Maharishi was a Good Guru and then became a
Not-so-Good Guru..??!!
I have a doubt, Prof. Moriarty was always one step ahead of Sherlock Holmes. If Prof.
Moriarty practices
May 2006 18:29:15 -0500
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
you can be pregnant and then have a miscarriage.
Jason Spock at jedi_spock@ wrote:
Ha Ha, My keyboard has a problem with the letter O' . The o's
run off without control.
No man
: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
you can be pregnant and then have a miscarriage.
Jason Spock at jedi_spock@ wrote:
Ha Ha, My keyboard has a problem with the letter O' . The o's
run off without control.
No man in his right mind would call his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel
babajii_99@ wrote:
snip
I'm not sure what celibacy has to do with being a teacher; is this
a Catholic thing? or something?
There's a very long tradition,
On May 16, 2006, at 10:40 AM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's quasi-official announcement on the subject is that for people
who are comfortable
with celibacy, this is the fastest way to get enlightened, but for
people who are not, the
strain of trying to remain celibate is counter-evolutionary.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 16, 2006, at 10:40 AM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's quasi-official announcement on the subject is that for
people who are comfortable
with celibacy, this is the fastest way to get enlightened, but
forpeople who are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 16, 2006, at 10:40 AM, sparaig wrote:
MMY's quasi-official announcement on the subject is that for people
who are comfortable
with celibacy, this is the fastest way to get enlightened, but for
people who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a Miss Boom-Boom LaVerne here for you,
Ah, another Bob Cummings fan.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did any teachers ever date your initiates? I always felt squirrelly
about this. It seemed to violate the ethics of the therapist/client
relationship. I remember being attracted to some of them, and
enjoying the
On May 16, 2006, at 11:37 AM, sparaig wrote:
So you're saying that he's been screwing prostitutes in Holland?
Maybe just working on some new techniques?
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 16, 2006, at 11:37 AM, sparaig wrote:
So you're saying that he's been screwing prostitutes in Holland?
Maybe just working on some new techniques?
I've never gotten any feeling of personal hostility from
On May 16, 2006, at 11:27 AM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
Did any teachers ever date your initiates? I always felt squirrelly
about this. It seemed to violate the ethics of the therapist/client
relationship. I remember being attracted to some of them, and
enjoying the fantasy of slipping in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 5/12/06 3:49 PM, Ingegerd at marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 5/12/06 3:49 PM, Ingegerd at marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@
wrote:
I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have
no
doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and
a
Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people with loot of Money.
Did Maharishi give those women Money or something,??
--- "shempmcgurk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A few years ago I made this very point when someone who had been involved with Muktananda and had been abused had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have
no
doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and
a
devotee, is abuse. The feelings of love that we had for MMY
(both
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people with loot of Money.
Did Maharishi give those women Money or something,??
In one case he did. After Jennifer left
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
with loot
of Money.
Freudian slip?
Did Maharishi give those women Money or something,??
--- shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
A few years ago I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
with loot of
Money.
Did Maharishi give those women Money or something,??
In one case he
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip from What is Enlightenment magazine.
...and let's not forget the Who, When, Where, and How is Enlightenment
too! Of course, it'd be a much larger magazine...Happy Saturday
morning everyone!
To
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
with loot of
Money.
Did Maharishi give those women Money or something,??
In one case he
on 5/13/06 10:22 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
with loot of
Money.
Did Maharishi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 5/13/06 10:22 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at jedi_spock@ wrote:
Maharishi has a lot
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
on 5/13/06 4:17 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ha Ha, My keyboard has a problem with the letter O' . The o's run off without control.
No man in his right mind would call his Secretary into his bedroom
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 5/12/06 3:49 PM, Ingegerd at marwincornyarmand@ wrote:
I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have no
doubt
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at jedi_spock@ wrote:
Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
with loot of
Money.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at jedi_spock@ wrote:
Maharishi has a lot Money. Women are attracted to people
with loot of
Money.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 5/13/06 10:22 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
fairfieldlife@ wrote:
on 5/13/06 7:02 AM, Jason at jedi_spock@ wrote:
Maharishi has a lot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 5/10/06 4:15 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think a Great Spiritual leader like Maharishi would
be stupid
enough to first approach those 5+ women first.??
If this is true, those 5+
on 5/12/06 3:49 PM, Ingegerd at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have no
doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and a
devotee, is abuse. The feelings of love that we had for MMY (both
men and women), the power of his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 5/12/06 3:49 PM, Ingegerd at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have no
doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and a
devotee, is abuse.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have no
doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and a
devotee, is abuse. The feelings of love that we had for MMY (both
men and women),
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@
wrote:
I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have
no
doubt that a sexual relationship between the Guru/Maharishi and
a
devotee, is abuse. The feelings of love that we had for MMY
(both
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@
wrote:
I have been working with women that has been abused. And I have
no
doubt that a sexual relationship between the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 wayback71@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ingegerd
marwincornyarmand@
wrote:
I have been working with women that has been abused. And
--- HMuktananda's case differed since strong evidence points
to the victims being underage. Thus, they (some, many, all?) were
not adults. Thus, they were victims.
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
on 5/12/06 9:48 PM, feste37 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just think that to call these women victims is pathetic. They weren't
victims
of anything. They were adult women who were free to do whatever they
wanted. They weren't coerced. And as far as abuse of power is concerned, it
seems
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hyperbolicgeometry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- HMuktananda's case differed since strong evidence
points
to the victims being underage. Thus, they (some, many, all?)
were
not adults. Thus, they were victims.
Yes. If someone is under the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 5/10/06 6:27 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jokes apart, Sir Archer mentioned that it wasn't a One-Way
street.
If the women did initiate and Maharishi was forced to
Satisfy their
23:59:20 -0500Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?-Maharishi initiated all the relationships Im aware
of, but never forcefully. The accounts indicate that he didnt display the coercion and persistence that usually characterizes men overshadowed by lust
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gloria Steinem says that a man is allowed one free grope, one free
open mouthed kiss, one free placing of a woman's hand over the man's
genitals and as long as a man respects the woman's no to all of
the above
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?-
on 5/11/06 4:56 AM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this is true, then it's sad. A seer who renounced everything should never initiate relationships.
there are some in the Sexy Sadie file.
To subscribe
--- lurkernomore wrote:
--- shempmcgurk wrote:
Gloria Steinem says that a man is allowed one free grope
Man, a solid two chuckle morning. This is good.
Next time I see Gloria I'm going to take her up on
that free grope. That's very generous of her.
To subscribe, send a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Gloria Steinem says that a man is allowed one free grope
Next time I see Gloria I'm going to take her up on
that free grope. That's very generous of her.
She must have been a beautiful baby, but baby
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming that he took
advantage of them, abused them in any way, or did things to them
against their will?
Doesn't that seem like a pretty low bar for a spiritual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming that he took
advantage of them, abused them in any way, or did things to them
against their will?
Doesn't that seem like a pretty low bar for a spiritual
On May 10, 2006, at 1:15 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mahdeealoo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why would this female wait til MMY has dropped his body to publish
a book about this? Is
there something he could refute/defend, like the fact that he was
not
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I have a question for you: Assuming for just a moment that these
accusations were true, how would that change your practise of TM?
Assuming that I still meditate, his personal life has nothing to do with my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd face the picture of Mahesh the other way when my eyes were closed?
Assuming I have pictures of MMY to turn around, why would I face the picture the other way
when my eyes are closed? I can't see through my eyelids, yet.
On May 10, 2006, at 7:30 AM, mahdeealoo wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd face the picture of Mahesh the other way when my eyes were closed?
Assuming I have pictures of MMY to turn around, why would I face
the picture the other way
when my
So was my reply. Good Morning :-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 10, 2006, at 7:30 AM, mahdeealoo wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
I'd face the picture of Mahesh the other way when my eyes were closed?
Yes, I agree. It is said that the gross relative can be quite gross.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 9, 2006, at 11:43 PM, mahdeealoo wrote:
Why would this female wait til MMY has dropped his body to publish
a book about this? Is
there
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mahdeealoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote:
But I have a question for you: Assuming for just a moment that
these accusations were true, how would that change your practise
of TM?
For the most part, this is a forum composed
of people who are more than aware of the good things about
Maharishi and the TM movement and the less-than-good
things, and who have come to some sense of balance and
comfort with both. They are who they are, right here, right
now, in the present.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mahdeealoo mahdeealoo@
wrote:
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
But I have a question for you: Assuming for just a moment
that these
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the most part, this is a forum composed
of people who are more than aware of the good things about
Maharishi and the TM movement and the less-than-good
things, and who have come to some sense of balance
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mahdeealoo mahdeealoo@
wrote:
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
on 5/10/06 12:25 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick, I think of something I remember reading that Paul McCartney
said to John Lennon on his return to England from India. As you'll
recall Ringo and Paul left earlier than George and John did, so Paul
wasn't around when the
on 5/10/06 12:55 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming that he took
advantage of them, abused them in any way, or did things to them
against their will?
Since I was on a course where sex was forbidden (sidhaland) it would
have been more human of him to admit that it was not a goal even he
had achieved. Now I think of it as such a strange instruction, almost
crazy-making. I mean if God didn't want us to be tempted ,why did he
make our arms so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mahdeealoo mahdeealoo@
wrote:
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
But I have a question for you: Assuming for just a moment that
on 5/10/06 10:06 AM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I was on a course where sex was forbidden (sidhaland) it would
have been more human of him to admit that it was not a goal even he
had achieved. Now I think of it as such a strange instruction, almost
crazy-making. I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I was on a course where sex was forbidden (sidhaland) it
would
have been more human of him to admit that it was not a goal even he
had achieved. Now I think of it as such a strange instruction,
almost
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 5/10/06 10:06 AM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since I was on a course where sex was forbidden (sidhaland) it
would
have been more human of him to admit that it was not a goal even
he
had
on 5/10/06 10:48 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there's a time and place for everything, and I think
celibacy has
its value. I'm open to the possibility that in MMY's case, it was
no longer
relevant.
Rick, when you found out and became convinced about MMY's sexual
I remember when I believed that some people could be completely
non-sexual. I think that is what I believed about Michael Jackson
till it all came out. Then I felt so naive!
I had a good friend in the M initiator group who I felt was angelic
like that. Then it turned out that he was just gay
on 5/10/06 11:26 AM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember when I believed that some people could be completely
non-sexual. I think that is what I believed about Michael Jackson
till it all came out. Then I felt so naive!
I had a good friend in the M initiator group who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 5/10/06 12:25 AM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick, I think of something I remember reading that Paul McCartney
said to John Lennon on his return to England from India. As you'll
recall Ringo
on 5/10/06 12:57 PM, feste37 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So why are you making it your business now? People seem very unforgiving.
This happened, what, 40 years ago? How long are you going to let it bug
you? Another 40 years? I remember a remark made by the Dalai Lama, to the
effect that
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 5/10/06 12:55 AM, shempmcgurk at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming
that he took
advantage of them, abused them in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 5/10/06 12:55 AM, shempmcgurk at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Are any of
Hi Peter. Thanks for the positive words about me in your previous
posts. We had so many engaging discussions at MIU.
On your point about the puritanical nature of the movement, remember
how shocking it was to read the uncensored Rig Veda! That culture
seemed a little more comfortable with the
Curtis (hey! How are you?)
you had good experiences through MMY/TM/TM-siddhis, I
assume. How do you balance/reconcile/whatever your
good experiences with the self-evident whackiness?
-Peter
I did have great experiences with the program. For me it was the
interpretation of what those
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
on 5/10/06 4:15 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you think a Great Spiritual leader like Maharishi would be stupid enough to first approach those 5+ women first.??
If this is true, those 5+ women would have
..?? ShempMcGurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 21:18:08 -Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?I don't understand your question. Please read it over and ask it again because your first and second sentences seem contradictory to me. Rick Archer [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 5/10/06 11:26 AM, curtisdeltablues at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember when I believed that some people could be completely
non-sexual. I think that is what I believed about Michael Jackson
till it all
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
I don't understand your question. Please read it over and ask
it
again because your first and second sentences seem contradictory
to
me.
Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:26:13 -0500
Subject: Re
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 5/10/06 11:26 AM, curtisdeltablues at curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
I remember when I believed that some people could be completely
On May 10, 2006, at 6:13 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
How much do you want to bet that this fellow is still teaching TM
for two -- and ONLY two -- reasons:
1) MMY is NOT aware that a homosexual is giving out his teaching; and
2) His brother is high-placed in the TMO.
3) The TMO is so
: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:11:16 -Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for
MMY, eh?Yes, Jason, it is the obligation of life-long celibates to satify the sexual urges of their students if and only if the students initiate. For both Sir Archer and Sir McGurk, What I asked was, Who made
NO and disappoint his disciples.??
He can say yes and renounce his monk's vows...and not necessarily
in that order...
ShempMcGurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:11:16 -
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?
Yes, Jason
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer fairfieldlife@
wrote:
on 5/10/06 11:26 AM, curtisdeltablues at curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
I remember when I believed that some people could be completely
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girlfriends Galore for MMY, eh?-
on 5/10/06 6:27 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jokes apart, Sir Archer mentioned that it wasn't a One-Way street.
If the women did initiate and Maharishi was forced to Satisfy their sexual urges, then It's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mahdeealoo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why would this female wait til MMY has dropped his body to publish
a book about this? Is
there something he could refute/defend, like the fact that he was
not her boyfriend and
just her Guru? HELLO! Geez,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 5/9/06 10:43 PM, mahdeealoo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would this female wait til MMY has dropped his body to
publish a book
about this?
I don't know. Maybe she doesn't want to embarrass him? She
Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming that he took
advantage of them, abused them in any way, or did things to them
against their will?
Doesn't that seem like a pretty low bar for a spiritual master? I
mean gosh, I make this grade, even by Judy's perspective of me.
You guys rock! I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are any of the 5+ women that you cite claiming that he took
advantage of them, abused them in any way, or did things to them
against their will?
Doesn't that seem like a pretty low bar for a spiritual
100 matches
Mail list logo
