>Bhairitu wrote:
>
> uns_tressor wrote:
> > As for the last, these insurance companies,
> > now with a flood of new custom, are going to be very interested
> > in remedies that are cost effective. They could have a very
> > pragmatic attitude.
> >
> > TM should get in the frame.
>
> The best th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor" wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings wrote:
> >
> >And how do you feel that your health system costs the British
> > taxpayer half of what the US system costs the US taxpayer?
> >
> > OffWorld
> >
> A lot of
uns_tressor wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings wrote:
>
>> And how do you feel that your health system costs the British
>> taxpayer half of what the US system costs the US taxpayer?
>>
>> OffWorld
>>
>>
> A lot of "Nones" here. As for the last, these insurance
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings wrote:
>
>And how do you feel that your health system costs the British
> taxpayer half of what the US system costs the US taxpayer?
>
> OffWorld
>
A lot of "Nones" here. As for the last, these insurance companies,
now with a flood of new c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor"
wrote:
>
> Zippa dee doo dah. We did it in the late '40s.
>
> But this is a major opportunity for TM which is a very
> cost effective remedy for dozens of ailments which
> are expensive when treated conventionally. Will our
> people be asleep a
