This TM policy represents a major re-think around mental well-being and TM.
In initiative this evolved of a necessity in response to what was a growing
public scrutiny of mental health in the meditating community of Fairfield, Ia.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
But, compared to the spiritual awakening and enlightenment that meditation can
bring to a human incarnation, what is this down-side risk (likelihood)
otherwise and how to manage that risk?
Moderation is the golden rule?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote
This is the new guideline around mental illness not only for the campus
meditating community in Fairfield, Iowa but the whole of TM now in effect:
http://portals.mum.edu/Customized/uploads/guidelines-for-mental-health.html
Our own meditators out in the larger meditating community from our long life
experience with the TM organization will decry, “They'll Never Change”. Well,
the movement changed on this. The TM movement moved on this. That took a lot of
work in progress. Culture change will follow in time.
I haven't read all of this yet, but from what I have seen this must rank as the
most mature approach the movement has ever had to this issue. Huge progress has
been made, and people have been educated. If this document is any guide, the
movement seems to be moving away from its old dogmatic and
"the ice is melting" - lol. I just looked at it and yes, the language is unlike
anything I have seen before from the movement - very straightforward and
practical.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote :
I haven't read all of this yet, but from what I have seen
The post-founder TM movement from the highest levels in honest deliberation
very wisely changed on this whole thing using the best of modern science that
is known, practiced and learnt around modern mental well-being now to figure it
out.
In TM this was the working out in policy