[FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-04-02 Thread aryavazhi
Hi Sera,

most points agreed. I just got carried away a bit, because I found, whatever 
little bits we saw in Russels piece from Fauxnews so outrageous, that I 
couldn't believe there is a serious audience for it.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 Re Sera, are you trying to say, that two evils cancel each other out?: 

 No. I'm avoiding that cliche. But to avoid being taken in by bias it is an 
excellent prophylactic to read a variety of sources with opposed takes on life. 
There are certain takes that doubtless aren't worth wasting time on - Holocaust 
deniers, flat-earthers and creationists, say - but most journalists preach to 
the converted, those who share similar worldviews to themselves. There are 
precious few writers with integrity. George Orwell is the gold standard. 
Everybody respects Orwell regardless of whether they are on the left or the 
right. The key was his commitment to truth and basic decency. If you ditch 
truth and regard persuasion as your priority, or if you ditch decency and 
regard power as your goal, you'll end up penning intellectual poison. The 
antidote is then to read a biased writer on the opposite end of the spectrum. I 
just wish there were more Orwells around!
 

 There's always a place for out-and-out polemicists with a satirical streak 
(maybe Ann Coulter versus Michael Moore? I haven't got much time for either of 
them to be honest). But you know where you are with them and can simply enjoy 
the ride.
 

 I'm at a disadvantage here as I've never had the pleasure of watching Fox 
News. From what I've heard it doesn't sound like I'm going to become a fan. 
I'll take a look later at the documentary posted by Bhairitu, OutFoxed!
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 Sera, are you trying to say, that two evils cancel each other out? No, you 
don't, do you? I can't imagine any other convoluted sh*t of propaganda piece as 
this one, and you don't want to even compare it to upright journalism, which 
does exist. Russel is completely right to get outraged at this. The guy who 
committed this mass murder 'extended' suicide, actually had his house only 
about 30 kms from my place, I could have passed him by with the car easily. And 
he was seriously sick, pipolar as it seems. This happens. He went to see many 
doctors and wasn't poor by any means. He simply was mentally sick, not 
religious, not islamic. He had issues with his girl friend and issues with his 
career. We have non-stop TV coverage here, but I have never seen such a piece 
of sh*t as this one from Fox News, that there are even half way sane people who 
see this is unimaginable.

The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they imagine that 
their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and objective. Well, it 
isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator mag (right-wing) and The New 
Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. That way both hemispheres of my brain are 
balanced out.


  




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-04-02 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
There is an audience for it because he is saying what is popular now, what lots 
of people want to hear - that life is crazy, big banks are bad, rich people are 
screwing everyone else.They don't take the time to see what kind of person he 
really is. I won't take the time to type a description of him - Sal has done an 
excellent job of that in the past.

  From: aryavazhi no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 4:48 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into 
a mountain?
   
    Hi Sera,

most points agreed. I just got carried away a bit, because I found, whatever 
little bits we saw in Russels piece from Fauxnews so outrageous, that I 
couldn't believe there is a serious audience for it.




---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

Re Sera, are you trying to say, that two evils cancel each other out?:
No. I'm avoiding that cliche. But to avoid being taken in by bias it is an 
excellent prophylactic to read a variety of sources with opposed takes on life. 
There are certain takes that doubtless aren't worth wasting time on - Holocaust 
deniers, flat-earthers and creationists, say - but most journalists preach to 
the converted, those who share similar worldviews to themselves. There are 
precious few writers with integrity. George Orwell is the gold standard. 
Everybody respects Orwell regardless of whether they are on the left or the 
right. The key was his commitment to truth and basic decency. If you ditch 
truth and regard persuasion as your priority, or if you ditch decency and 
regard power as your goal, you'll end up penning intellectual poison. The 
antidote is then to read a biased writer on the opposite end of the spectrum. I 
just wish there were more Orwells around!
There's always a place for out-and-out polemicists with a satirical streak 
(maybe Ann Coulter versus Michael Moore? I haven't got much time for either of 
them to be honest). But you know where you are with them and can simply enjoy 
the ride.
I'm at a disadvantage here as I've never had the pleasure of watching Fox News. 
From what I've heard it doesn't sound like I'm going to become a fan. I'll take 
a look later at the documentary posted by Bhairitu, OutFoxed!


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

Sera, are you trying to say, that two evils cancel each other out? No, you 
don't, do you? I can't imagine any other convoluted sh*t of propaganda piece as 
this one, and you don't want to even compare it to upright journalism, which 
does exist. Russel is completely right to get outraged at this. The guy who 
committed this mass murder 'extended' suicide, actually had his house only 
about 30 kms from my place, I could have passed him by with the car easily. And 
he was seriously sick, pipolar as it seems. This happens. He went to see many 
doctors and wasn't poor by any means. He simply was mentally sick, not 
religious, not islamic. He had issues with his girl friend and issues with his 
career. We have non-stop TV coverage here, but I have never seen such a piece 
of sh*t as this one from Fox News, that there are even half way sane people who 
see this is unimaginable.

The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation(not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they imagine that 
theirown preferred source of propaganda is reliable and objective. Well, 
itisn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator mag (right-wing) and The 
New Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. That way both hemispheres of my brain 
are balanced out.   #yiv5339706780 #yiv5339706780 -- #yiv5339706780ygrp-mkp 
{border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 
10px;}#yiv5339706780 #yiv5339706780ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;}#yiv5339706780 #yiv5339706780ygrp-mkp #yiv5339706780hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv5339706780 #yiv5339706780ygrp-mkp #yiv5339706780ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv5339706780 #yiv5339706780ygrp-mkp .yiv5339706780ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv5339706780 #yiv5339706780ygrp-mkp .yiv5339706780ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv5339706780 #yiv5339706780ygrp-mkp .yiv5339706780ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv5339706780 #yiv5339706780ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv5339706780ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv5339706780 
#yiv5339706780ygrp-sponsor #yiv5339706780ygrp-lc #yiv5339706780hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv5339706780 
#yiv5339706780ygrp-sponsor #yiv5339706780ygrp-lc .yiv5339706780ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv5339706780 #yiv5339706780actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv5339706780 
#yiv5339706780activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv5339706780
 #yiv5339706780activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv5339706780 
#yiv5339706780activity span:first-child 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-04-02 Thread rich...@rwilliams.us [FairfieldLife]

 Maybe you're just JELLOS. According to what I've read, Brand is a comic genius 
 - he must be pretty smart since he got Katy Perry. But, he probably can't 
compare to all your many talents. LoL!

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :

 There is an audience for it because he is saying what is popular now, what 
lots of people want to hear - that life is crazy, big banks are bad, rich 
people are screwing everyone else.

Non sequitur.

They don't take the time to see what kind of person he really is. I won't take 
the time to type a description of him - Sal has done an excellent job of that 
in the past.

Non sequitur.

 

 From: aryavazhi no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 4:48 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into 
a mountain?
 
 
   Hi Sera,

most points agreed. I just got carried away a bit, because I found, whatever 
little bits we saw in Russels piece from Fauxnews so outrageous, that I 
couldn't believe there is a serious audience for it.

 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 Re Sera, are you trying to say, that two evils cancel each other out?: 

 No. I'm avoiding that cliche. But to avoid being taken in by bias it is an 
excellent prophylactic to read a variety of sources with opposed takes on life. 
There are certain takes that doubtless aren't worth wasting time on - Holocaust 
deniers, flat-earthers and creationists, say - but most journalists preach to 
the converted, those who share similar worldviews to themselves. There are 
precious few writers with integrity. George Orwell is the gold standard. 
Everybody respects Orwell regardless of whether they are on the left or the 
right. The key was his commitment to truth and basic decency. If you ditch 
truth and regard persuasion as your priority, or if you ditch decency and 
regard power as your goal, you'll end up penning intellectual poison. The 
antidote is then to read a biased writer on the opposite end of the spectrum. I 
just wish there were more Orwells around!
 

 There's always a place for out-and-out polemicists with a satirical streak 
(maybe Ann Coulter versus Michael Moore? I haven't got much time for either of 
them to be honest). But you know where you are with them and can simply enjoy 
the ride.
 

 I'm at a disadvantage here as I've never had the pleasure of watching Fox 
News. From what I've heard it doesn't sound like I'm going to become a fan. 
I'll take a look later at the documentary posted by Bhairitu, OutFoxed!
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 Sera, are you trying to say, that two evils cancel each other out? No, you 
don't, do you? I can't imagine any other convoluted sh*t of propaganda piece as 
this one, and you don't want to even compare it to upright journalism, which 
does exist. Russel is completely right to get outraged at this. The guy who 
committed this mass murder 'extended' suicide, actually had his house only 
about 30 kms from my place, I could have passed him by with the car easily. And 
he was seriously sick, pipolar as it seems. This happens. He went to see many 
doctors and wasn't poor by any means. He simply was mentally sick, not 
religious, not islamic. He had issues with his girl friend and issues with his 
career. We have non-stop TV coverage here, but I have never seen such a piece 
of sh*t as this one from Fox News, that there are even half way sane people who 
see this is unimaginable.

The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they imagine that 
their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and objective. Well, it 
isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator mag (right-wing) and The New 
Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. That way both hemispheres of my brain are 
balanced out.


  




 


 











  

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mjackson74@... wrote :

 There is an audience for it because he is saying what is popular now, what 
lots of people want to hear - that life is crazy, big banks are bad, rich 
people are screwing everyone else.They don't take the time to see what kind of 
person he really is. I won't take the time to type a description of him - Sal 
has done an excellent job of that in the past.

 

 From: aryavazhi no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 4:48 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into 
a mountain?
 
 
   Hi Sera,

most points agreed. I just got carried away a bit, because I found, whatever 
little bits we saw in Russels piece from Fauxnews so outrageous, that I 
couldn't believe there is a serious audience for it.

 


 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 Re Sera, are you trying to say, that two evils cancel each other out?: 

 No. I'm 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-04-01 Thread salyavin808

 He does raise an interesting point though. Is our society making people 
mentally ill? As capitalism overheats and it turns from meaning simply that the 
means of production are in private hands to meaning that everything is 
predicated as to whether it benefits business or not.
 

 Look at our current government. They've held a torch to workers rights simply 
because business leaders said it would be better for them. The result is a much 
less equal society rife with zero-hours contracts and no job security and the 
lower taxes the rich want mean that unemployment benefits are slashed so the 
level of insecurity increases. 
 

 The promise of all this is that the wealth creators get what they want but 
with some vague and undefined promise that their newly created wealth somehow 
trickles down to the rest of society. This obviously doesn't happen but still 
the opinion of business leaders will probably swing this election.
 

 So far so familiar but does it actually make people ill? Is there a base level 
of anxiety (which is known to cause depression) in society that is exacerbated 
by capitalist policies that will actually result in more people going postal 
than usual?
 

 It'd be an interesting study. Not sure how we'd start it, maybe check GP 
records for prescriptions for either anti-depressants or talking therapies. I'm 
fairly sure they are up considerably. But finding a link between that and 
incidents like the Germanwings tragedy is going to take some doing. The main 
problem I can see being how you would isolate the amount of spree killings 
caused by societal stress from the any caused by, say, memes of mass murder 
that permeate society through the media from groups like ISIS. 
 

 Beheadings are now quite common in criminal endeavors. A squabble between drug 
addicts in my home town ended up with someone's head being lopped off with a 
carving knife. I bet it wouldn't have happened a few years ago.  It seems the 
actions of a bunch of maniacs in the middle east has coarsened expectations and 
desensitised us to more extreme violence. Which, type of influence - if any - 
could be blamed for the actions of the German pilot? Or was it just one of 
those things? If there is any truth to Brands argument we'll see a lot more 
things like that but even then, I don't trust statistical analyses of violent 
events. Look at what the TMO has tried to prove with them
 

 And I'm surprised that Russell Brand - being a TMer - hasn't realised that 
mass meditation would be a cure for all this new stress. The TMO always used to 
say that in our modern world the increase of stress can only be managed by 
lowering your own base level. It's like he doesn't care about spreading the 
word any more! Is he getting bored with his practise? Does he not believe the 
speil that he has undoubtably heard from John Hagelin and David Lynch (who is 
much more of a TB in things like the Marshy Effect than he ever lets on)?
 

 Or is he wisely keeping his mouth shut lest that stain of association ruins 
his career? 
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-04-01 Thread rich...@rwilliams.us [FairfieldLife]
There's probably not a single informant on this list that watches Fox News on 
U.S. TV. Correct me if I'm wrong about this. In the UK, I understand that 
reading the Daily Mail is very popular. LoL!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/index.html
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 Re Fox manipulation of the audience:
 

 Yes, we know that the media manipulates the audience. I just hope that you see 
that ALL the different media outlets - TV channels, cinema, newspapers, mags - 
manipulate their consumers. 
 

 The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they imagine that 
their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and objective. Well, it 
isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator mag (right-wing) and The New 
Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. That way both hemispheres of my brain are 
balanced out.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

 I watched the entire video.  Brand pointed out the Fox manipulation of the 
audience.  IOW, status quo good, the public bad. I applaud that.  And since 
when does capitalism mean liberal democracy?  In the US it means a bunch of 
thugs who run big companies and screw the public.  Liberal democracy? My ass.
 
 On 03/31/2015 05:09 PM, s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
LEnglish5@... mailto:LEnglish5@... wrote :
 
 That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox?
 

 I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand's narcissism. His manic presentation 
does no one any favours. 
 
 
 Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the idea that capitalism (aka liberal 
democracy) is turning people into crackpots who willingly terrorize and murder 
innocent people, including children? Ask your friends and neighbours what they 
think of the outrage. They'll react with disgust. Why should they react like 
that? Why haven't they been infected with the Lubitz curse? Because they get on 
with their lives and engage with the society around them and try and make use 
of the opportunities on offer to do something positive for themselves and their 
families.
 

 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@... wrote :
 
 The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg
 



  


 






[FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-04-01 Thread aryavazhi
Sera, are you trying to say, that two evils cancel each other out? No, you 
don't, do you? I can't imagine any other convoluted sh*t of propaganda piece as 
this one, and you don't want to even compare it to upright journalism, which 
does exist. Russel is completely right to get outraged at this. The guy who 
committed this mass murder 'extended' suicide, actually had his house only 
about 30 kms from my place, I could have passed him by with the car easily. And 
he was seriously sick, pipolar as it seems. This happens. He went to see many 
doctors and wasn't poor by any means. He simply was mentally sick, not 
religious, not islamic. He had issues with his girl friend and issues with his 
career. We have non-stop TV coverage here, but I have never seen such a piece 
of sh*t as this one from Fox News, that there are even half way sane people who 
see this is unimaginable.

The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they imagine that 
their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and objective. Well, it 
isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator mag (right-wing) and The New 
Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. That way both hemispheres of my brain are 
balanced out.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-04-01 Thread rich...@rwilliams.us [FairfieldLife]

 Strident demagoguery may sell for a short period of time, but it has little 
staying power. In contrast, the talking head shows on Fox and CNN deal with 
dissent in a much more mature manner, and usually features more of it than 
MSNBC prime-time shows do. For that matter, Morning Joe has a much different 
dynamic than the channel’s prime-time shows, and it’s thriving.

MSNBC ratings crater as NBC looks for new direction
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/01/msnbc-ratings-crater-as-nbc-looks-for-new-direction/
 
http://hotair.com/archives/2015/04/01/msnbc-ratings-crater-as-nbc-looks-for-new-direction/
  
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

 I've been in the arts all my life.  I know exactly how to manipulate an 
audience.  FOX News a joke in the US. They call their network fair and 
balanced which is a real laugh.  It's old Rupert's pet project and fair 
removed from the way that the FOX entertainment outlets are run.  FFL used to 
have an Emmy award winning editor posting.  He mentioned that of the US TV 
networks that FOX was the easiest to work with.  I recalled an Esquire 
interview with Rupert Murdoch published in the 1990s where they asked him about 
the content of his shows and he said he didn't care as long as they made money.
 
 What Brand was doing was no different than a lot of news analysts have done 
critiquing FOX News.  In fact there is a documentary about it called 
OutFoxed! by Robert Greenwald:
 
 https://youtu.be/P74oHhU5MDk https://youtu.be/P74oHhU5MDk
 
 There are even right wingers who dislike FOX News as being just an arm of the 
status quo.
 
 On 03/31/2015 06:06 PM, s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
 
   Re Fox manipulation of the audience:

 
 
 Yes, we know that the media manipulates the audience. I just hope that you see 
that ALL the different media outlets - TV channels, cinema, newspapers, mags - 
manipulate their consumers. 
 
 
 The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they imagine that 
their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and objective. Well, it 
isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator mag (right-wing) and The New 
Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. That way both hemispheres of my brain are 
balanced out.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 I watched the entire video.  Brand pointed out the Fox manipulation of the 
audience.  IOW, status quo good, the public bad. I applaud that.  And since 
when does capitalism mean liberal democracy?  In the US it means a bunch of 
thugs who run big companies and screw the public.  Liberal democracy? My ass.
 
 On 03/31/2015 05:09 PM, s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
LEnglish5@... mailto:LEnglish5@... wrote :
 
 That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox?
 

 I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand's narcissism. His manic presentation 
does no one any favours. 
 
 
 Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the idea that capitalism (aka liberal 
democracy) is turning people into crackpots who willingly terrorize and murder 
innocent people, including children? Ask your friends and neighbours what they 
think of the outrage. They'll react with disgust. Why should they react like 
that? Why haven't they been infected with the Lubitz curse? Because they get on 
with their lives and engage with the society around them and try and make use 
of the opportunities on offer to do something positive for themselves and their 
families.
 

 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@... wrote :
 
 The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg
 



  


 



 


  


[FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-04-01 Thread s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Re Sera, are you trying to say, that two evils cancel each other out?: 

 No. I'm avoiding that cliche. But to avoid being taken in by bias it is an 
excellent prophylactic to read a variety of sources with opposed takes on life. 
There are certain takes that doubtless aren't worth wasting time on - Holocaust 
deniers, flat-earthers and creationists, say - but most journalists preach to 
the converted, those who share similar worldviews to themselves. There are 
precious few writers with integrity. George Orwell is the gold standard. 
Everybody respects Orwell regardless of whether they are on the left or the 
right. The key was his commitment to truth and basic decency. If you ditch 
truth and regard persuasion as your priority, or if you ditch decency and 
regard power as your goal, you'll end up penning intellectual poison. The 
antidote is then to read a biased writer on the opposite end of the spectrum. I 
just wish there were more Orwells around!
 

 There's always a place for out-and-out polemicists with a satirical streak 
(maybe Ann Coulter versus Michael Moore? I haven't got much time for either of 
them to be honest). But you know where you are with them and can simply enjoy 
the ride.
 

 I'm at a disadvantage here as I've never had the pleasure of watching Fox 
News. From what I've heard it doesn't sound like I'm going to become a fan. 
I'll take a look later at the documentary posted by Bhairitu, OutFoxed!
 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 Sera, are you trying to say, that two evils cancel each other out? No, you 
don't, do you? I can't imagine any other convoluted sh*t of propaganda piece as 
this one, and you don't want to even compare it to upright journalism, which 
does exist. Russel is completely right to get outraged at this. The guy who 
committed this mass murder 'extended' suicide, actually had his house only 
about 30 kms from my place, I could have passed him by with the car easily. And 
he was seriously sick, pipolar as it seems. This happens. He went to see many 
doctors and wasn't poor by any means. He simply was mentally sick, not 
religious, not islamic. He had issues with his girl friend and issues with his 
career. We have non-stop TV coverage here, but I have never seen such a piece 
of sh*t as this one from Fox News, that there are even half way sane people who 
see this is unimaginable.

The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they imagine that 
their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and objective. Well, it 
isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator mag (right-wing) and The New 
Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. That way both hemispheres of my brain are 
balanced out.


  


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-04-01 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
I've been in the arts all my life.  I know *exactly* how to manipulate 
an audience.  FOX News a joke in the US. They call their network fair 
and balanced which is a real laugh.  It's old Rupert's pet project and 
fair removed from the way that the FOX entertainment outlets are run.  
FFL used to have an Emmy award winning editor posting.  He mentioned 
that of the US TV networks that FOX was the easiest to work with.  I 
recalled an Esquire interview with Rupert Murdoch published in the 1990s 
where they asked him about the content of his shows and he said he 
didn't care as long as they made money.


What Brand was doing was no different than a lot of news analysts have 
done critiquing FOX News.  In fact there is a documentary about it 
called OutFoxed! by Robert Greenwald:


https://youtu.be/P74oHhU5MDk

There are even right wingers who dislike FOX News as being just an arm 
of the status quo.


On 03/31/2015 06:06 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:


Re Fox manipulation of the audience:


Yes, we know that the media manipulates the audience. I just hope that 
you see that ALL the different media outlets - TV channels, cinema, 
newspapers, mags - manipulate their consumers.


The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they 
imagine that their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and 
objective. Well, it isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator 
mag (right-wing) and The New Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. 
That way both hemispheres of my brain are balanced out.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

I watched the entire video.  Brand pointed out the Fox manipulation of 
the audience. IOW, status quo good, the public bad. I applaud that.  
And since when does capitalism mean liberal democracy?  In the US it 
means a bunch of thugs who run big companies and screw the public. 
Liberal democracy? My ass.


On 03/31/2015 05:09 PM, s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... 
mailto:LEnglish5@... wrote :


That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox?

I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand's narcissism. His manic 
presentation does no one any favours.


Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the idea that capitalism (aka 
liberal democracy) is turning people into crackpots who willingly 
terrorize and murder innocent people, including children? Ask your 
friends and neighbours what they think of the outrage. They'll react 
with disgust. Why should they react like that? Why haven't they been 
infected with the Lubitz curse? Because they get on with their lives 
and engage with the society around them and try and make use of the 
opportunities on offer to do something positive for themselves and 
their families.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... 
mailto:s3raphita@... wrote :


The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg








Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-03-31 Thread s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Re Fox manipulation of the audience:
 

 Yes, we know that the media manipulates the audience. I just hope that you see 
that ALL the different media outlets - TV channels, cinema, newspapers, mags - 
manipulate their consumers. 
 

 The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they imagine that 
their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and objective. Well, it 
isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator mag (right-wing) and The New 
Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. That way both hemispheres of my brain are 
balanced out.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

 I watched the entire video.  Brand pointed out the Fox manipulation of the 
audience.  IOW, status quo good, the public bad. I applaud that.  And since 
when does capitalism mean liberal democracy?  In the US it means a bunch of 
thugs who run big companies and screw the public.  Liberal democracy? My ass.
 
 On 03/31/2015 05:09 PM, s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@... [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
LEnglish5@... mailto:LEnglish5@... wrote :
 
 That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox?
 

 I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand's narcissism. His manic presentation 
does no one any favours. 
 
 
 Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the idea that capitalism (aka liberal 
democracy) is turning people into crackpots who willingly terrorize and murder 
innocent people, including children? Ask your friends and neighbours what they 
think of the outrage. They'll react with disgust. Why should they react like 
that? Why haven't they been infected with the Lubitz curse? Because they get on 
with their lives and engage with the society around them and try and make use 
of the opportunities on offer to do something positive for themselves and their 
families.
 

 

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@... wrote :
 
 The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg
 



  


 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-03-31 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
Geesh MJ, he's comedic actor.  What do you want him to sound like?  Some 
executive in a suit?


As for being rich I'm sure you remember Warren Buffet's comment about 
his secretary paying a higher tax rate than he does and how wrong that 
is.  He was hinting that the public should do something about that.  But 
the public is as apathetic as a bag of rocks.


Bill Gates father sponsored an initiative in Washington state for a 
higher tax rate on the rich.  It got voted down by the stupid poor who 
apparently believe they will someday be rich themselves as soon as they 
win the lottery.


On 03/31/2015 06:54 PM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
except that he makes people who speak against the status quo look like 
idiots since he is one himself, not to mention the hypocrisy of his 
yipping like a pack of yapping Chihuahuas about the rich when he is 
himself.



*From:* Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:29 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to 
crash a plane into a mountain?


Does he really stump that much for the TMO? In fact it almost looks 
like he has a picture of Yogananda by his bed not MMY.  Though maybe 
it's just a relative or girlfriend (too small to see for sure).  Most 
of the time he's stumping for the general public against the status 
quo.  Good on him for that.


On 03/31/2015 06:14 PM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com 
mailto:mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:



Quite ironic that Brand accuses the media of mental/emotional 
manipulation (which they do) while stumping for the TMO which does 
exactly the same thing.



*From:* s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
mailto:s3raph...@yahoo.com[FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

*Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:06 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to 
crash a plane into a mountain?


Re Fox manipulation of the audience:

Yes, we know that the media manipulates the audience. I just hope 
that you see that ALL the different media outlets - TV channels, 
cinema, newspapers, mags - manipulate their consumers.


The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they 
imagine that their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and 
objective. Well, it isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator 
mag (right-wing) and The New Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. 
That way both hemispheres of my brain are balanced out.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... 
mailto:noozguru@... wrote :


I watched the entire video. Brand pointed out the Fox manipulation of 
the audience. IOW, status quo good, the public bad. I applaud that. 
And since when does capitalism mean liberal democracy?  In the US it 
means a bunch of thugs who run big companies and screw the public. 
Liberal democracy? My ass.


On 03/31/2015 05:09 PM, s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... 
mailto:LEnglish5@... wrote :


That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox?

I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand's narcissism. His manic 
presentation does no one any favours.


Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the idea that capitalism (aka 
liberal democracy) is turning people into crackpots who willingly 
terrorize and murder innocent people, including children? Ask your 
friends and neighbours what they think of the outrage. They'll react 
with disgust. Why should they react like that? Why haven't they been 
infected with the Lubitz curse? Because they get on with their lives 
and engage with the society around them and try and make use of the 
opportunities on offer to do something positive for themselves and 
their families.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... 
mailto:s3raphita@... wrote :


The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg













Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-03-31 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Quite ironic that Brand accuses the media of mental/emotional manipulation 
(which they do) while stumping for the TMO which does exactly the same thing.

  From: s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:06 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane 
into a mountain?
   
    Re Fox manipulation of the audience:

Yes, we know that the media manipulates the audience. I just hope that you see 
that ALL the different media outlets - TV channels, cinema, newspapers, mags - 
manipulate their consumers. 
The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they imagine that 
their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and objective. Well, it 
isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator mag (right-wing) and The New 
Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. That way both hemispheres of my brain are 
balanced out.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

I watched the entire video.  Brandpointed out the Fox manipulation of the 
audience.  IOW, status quogood, the public bad. I applaud that.  And since when 
doescapitalism mean liberal democracy?  In the US it means a bunch ofthugs who 
run big companies and screw the public.  Liberaldemocracy? My ass.


 On 03/31/2015 05:09 PM, s3raphita@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:


  


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@...wrote :

That's it? That's all yougot  out of this video? Blame fox?
I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand'snarcissism. His manic presentation 
does no one anyfavours. 
Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the ideathat capitalism (aka liberal 
democracy) is turningpeople into crackpots who willingly terrorize andmurder 
innocent people, including children? Ask yourfriends and neighbours what they 
think of the outrage.They'll react with disgust. Why should they react 
likethat? Why haven't they been infected with the Lubitzcurse? Because they get 
on with their lives and engagewith the society around them and try and make use 
ofthe opportunities on offer to do something positivefor themselves and their 
families.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,s3raphita@... wrote :

The loony Brand blames Fox News for thetragedy . . 
.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg
 

  #yiv6923925411 #yiv6923925411 -- #yiv6923925411ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv6923925411 
#yiv6923925411ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv6923925411 
#yiv6923925411ygrp-mkp #yiv6923925411hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv6923925411 #yiv6923925411ygrp-mkp #yiv6923925411ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv6923925411 #yiv6923925411ygrp-mkp .yiv6923925411ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv6923925411 #yiv6923925411ygrp-mkp .yiv6923925411ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv6923925411 #yiv6923925411ygrp-mkp .yiv6923925411ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6923925411 #yiv6923925411ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv6923925411ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv6923925411 
#yiv6923925411ygrp-sponsor #yiv6923925411ygrp-lc #yiv6923925411hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv6923925411 
#yiv6923925411ygrp-sponsor #yiv6923925411ygrp-lc .yiv6923925411ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv6923925411 #yiv6923925411actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv6923925411 
#yiv6923925411activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv6923925411
 #yiv6923925411activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv6923925411 
#yiv6923925411activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv6923925411 #yiv6923925411activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6923925411 #yiv6923925411activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv6923925411 #yiv6923925411activity span 
.yiv6923925411underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv6923925411 
.yiv6923925411attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv6923925411 .yiv6923925411attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv6923925411 .yiv6923925411attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv6923925411 .yiv6923925411attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv6923925411 .yiv6923925411attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv6923925411 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv6923925411 .yiv6923925411bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv6923925411 
.yiv6923925411bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6923925411 dd.yiv6923925411last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv6923925411 dd.yiv6923925411last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv6923925411 
dd.yiv6923925411last p span.yiv6923925411yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv6923925411 div.yiv6923925411attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv6923925411 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-03-31 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
except that he makes people who speak against the status quo look like idiots 
since he is one himself, not to mention the hypocrisy of his yipping like a 
pack of yapping Chihuahuas about the rich when he is himself. 

  From: Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:29 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane 
into a mountain?
   
 Does he really stump that much for the TMO?  In fact it almost looks like 
he has a picture of Yogananda by his bed not MMY.  Though maybe it's just a 
relative or girlfriend (too small to see for sure).  Most of the time he's 
stumping for the general public against the status quo.  Good on him for that.
 
 On 03/31/2015 06:14 PM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
  


    Quite ironic that Brand accuses the media of mental/emotional manipulation 
(which they do) while stumping for the TMO which does exactly the same thing.
  
  From: s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:06 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane 
into a mountain?
   
    Re Fox manipulation of the audience:
  
  Yes, we know that the media manipulates the audience. I just hope that you 
see  that ALL the different media outlets - TV channels, cinema, newspapers, 
mags - manipulate their consumers.  
  The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they imagine that 
their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and objective. Well, it 
isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator mag (right-wing) and The New 
Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. That way both hemispheres of my brain are 
balanced out. 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :
 
  I watched the entire video.  Brand pointed out the Fox manipulation of the 
audience.  IOW, status quo good, the public bad. I applaud that.  And since 
when does capitalism mean liberal democracy?  In the US it means a bunch of 
thugs who run big companies and screw the public.  Liberal democracy? My ass.
 
 
 On 03/31/2015 05:09 PM, s3raphita@... [FairfieldLife] wrote:
 
  
    
  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :
 
 That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox? 
  I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand's narcissism. His manic  
presentation does no one any favours.  
  Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the idea that capitalism (aka  liberal 
democracy) is turning people into crackpots who  willingly terrorize and murder 
innocent people, including children? Ask your friends and neighbours what they 
think of the outrage.  They'll react with disgust. Why should they react like 
that? Why haven't they been infected with the Lubitz curse? Because they get on 
 with their lives and engage with the society around them and try and make use 
of the opportunities on offer to do something positive  for themselves and 
their families.  
  
  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :
 
  The loony Brand blames Fox News for the  tragedy . . . 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg
     
 
   
 
   
 
  #yiv3387470565 #yiv3387470565 -- #yiv3387470565ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv3387470565 
#yiv3387470565ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv3387470565 
#yiv3387470565ygrp-mkp #yiv3387470565hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv3387470565 #yiv3387470565ygrp-mkp #yiv3387470565ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv3387470565 #yiv3387470565ygrp-mkp .yiv3387470565ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv3387470565 #yiv3387470565ygrp-mkp .yiv3387470565ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv3387470565 #yiv3387470565ygrp-mkp .yiv3387470565ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3387470565 #yiv3387470565ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv3387470565ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv3387470565 
#yiv3387470565ygrp-sponsor #yiv3387470565ygrp-lc #yiv3387470565hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv3387470565 
#yiv3387470565ygrp-sponsor #yiv3387470565ygrp-lc .yiv3387470565ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv3387470565 #yiv3387470565actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv3387470565 
#yiv3387470565activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv3387470565
 #yiv3387470565activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv3387470565 
#yiv3387470565activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv3387470565 #yiv3387470565activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv3387470565 #yiv3387470565activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv3387470565 #yiv3387470565activity span 
.yiv3387470565underline 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-03-31 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
Does he really stump that much for the TMO?  In fact it almost looks 
like he has a picture of Yogananda by his bed not MMY.  Though maybe 
it's just a relative or girlfriend (too small to see for sure).  Most of 
the time he's stumping for the general public against the status quo.  
Good on him for that.


On 03/31/2015 06:14 PM, Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Quite ironic that Brand accuses the media of mental/emotional 
manipulation (which they do) while stumping for the TMO which does 
exactly the same thing.



*From:* s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:06 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to 
crash a plane into a mountain?


Re Fox manipulation of the audience:

Yes, we know that the media manipulates the audience. I just hope that 
you see that ALL the different media outlets - TV channels, cinema, 
newspapers, mags - manipulate their consumers.


The thing is, I always get twitchy when people attack one particular 
organisation (not that I've ever seen Fox News). It's as if they 
imagine that their own preferred source of propaganda is reliable and 
objective. Well, it isn't. Here in the UK I always read The Spectator 
mag (right-wing) and The New Statesman mag (left-wing) every week. 
That way both hemispheres of my brain are balanced out.



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

I watched the entire video.  Brand pointed out the Fox manipulation of 
the audience.  IOW, status quo good, the public bad. I applaud that.  
And since when does capitalism mean liberal democracy? In the US it 
means a bunch of thugs who run big companies and screw the public.  
Liberal democracy? My ass.


On 03/31/2015 05:09 PM, s3raphita@... mailto:s3raphita@...
[FairfieldLife] wrote:





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... 
mailto:LEnglish5@... wrote :


That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox?

I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand's narcissism. His manic 
presentation does no one any favours.


Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the idea that capitalism (aka 
liberal democracy) is turning people into crackpots who willingly 
terrorize and murder innocent people, including children? Ask your 
friends and neighbours what they think of the outrage. They'll react 
with disgust. Why should they react like that? Why haven't they been 
infected with the Lubitz curse? Because they get on with their lives 
and engage with the society around them and try and make use of the 
opportunities on offer to do something positive for themselves and 
their families.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... 
mailto:s3raphita@... wrote :


The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg









[FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-03-31 Thread lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox? 

 

 Cheee
 

 

 L
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg





[FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-03-31 Thread s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox?
 

 I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand's narcissism. His manic presentation 
does no one any favours. 
 

 Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the idea that capitalism (aka liberal 
democracy) is turning people into crackpots who willingly terrorize and murder 
innocent people, including children? Ask your friends and neighbours what they 
think of the outrage. They'll react with disgust. Why should they react like 
that? Why haven't they been infected with the Lubitz curse? Because they get on 
with their lives and engage with the society around them and try and make use 
of the opportunities on offer to do something positive for themselves and their 
families.
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg




  



[FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-03-31 Thread lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
Hmmm... 

 I always thought that capitalism meant something other than just turning a 
profit, though it isn't easy to decide when the latter turns into the former, 
and where the practicality ends and the self-destructive element begins.
 

 

 L
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox?
 

 I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand's narcissism. His manic presentation 
does no one any favours. 
 

 Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the idea that capitalism (aka liberal 
democracy) is turning people into crackpots who willingly terrorize and murder 
innocent people, including children? Ask your friends and neighbours what they 
think of the outrage. They'll react with disgust. Why should they react like 
that? Why haven't they been infected with the Lubitz curse? Because they get on 
with their lives and engage with the society around them and try and make use 
of the opportunities on offer to do something positive for themselves and their 
families.
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg




  





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-03-31 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
I watched the entire video.  Brand pointed out the Fox manipulation of 
the audience.  IOW, status quo good, the public bad. I applaud that.  
And since when does capitalism mean liberal democracy?  In the US it 
means a bunch of thugs who run big companies and screw the public.  
Liberal democracy? My ass.


On 03/31/2015 05:09 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox?

I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand's narcissism. His manic 
presentation does no one any favours.


Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the idea that capitalism (aka 
liberal democracy) is turning people into crackpots who willingly 
terrorize and murder innocent people, including children? Ask your 
friends and neighbours what they think of the outrage. They'll react 
with disgust. Why should they react like that? Why haven't they been 
infected with the Lubitz curse? Because they get on with their lives 
and engage with the society around them and try and make use of the 
opportunities on offer to do something positive for themselves and 
their families.





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg






[FairfieldLife] Re: Is Russell Brand mad enough to crash a plane into a mountain?

2015-03-31 Thread s3raph...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 Hmmm... 

 I always thought that capitalism meant something other than just turning a 
profit, though it isn't easy to decide when the latter turns into the former, 
and where the practicality ends and the self-destructive element begins.
 

 The self-destructive element in contemporary capitalism is there alright. Just 
take a look at the banking sector collapse. We all knew that the financial 
sector was full of predators with moral compass inoperative. But no one thought 
their short-sighted greed would lead them to (inadvertently) crash the very 
system that was rewarding them so handsomely.
 

 The Lubitz case is *completely* different. It's actually closer to the case of 
terrorist Anders Breivik. They were both young men who had no healthy 
engagement with the wider society and culture around them and had retreated 
into private worlds nursing their respective grievances. Both men were/are 
nihilists. I submit that the issue of nihilism - a rejection of all value - is 
more a religious crisis than an economic one.
 

 

 

 L
 analysis is that he doesn't 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 That's it? That's all you got  out of this video? Blame fox?
 

 I got the usual overdose of Russell Brand's narcissism. His manic presentation 
does no one any favours. 
 

 Do you really (I mean *really*) buy the idea that capitalism (aka liberal 
democracy) is turning people into crackpots who willingly terrorize and murder 
innocent people, including children? Ask your friends and neighbours what they 
think of the outrage. They'll react with disgust. Why should they react like 
that? Why haven't they been infected with the Lubitz curse? Because they get on 
with their lives and engage with the society around them and try and make use 
of the opportunities on offer to do something positive for themselves and their 
families.
 

 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, s3raphita@... wrote :

 The loony Brand blames Fox News for the tragedy . . .
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCREVmaRaeg