[FairfieldLife] Re: It's All About Richard J. Williams, was The Lying Sack-Of-Shitting of FFL

2014-12-03 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
As long as we are reviewing contributions to FFL we should also include 
this little gem from Curtis:


/Yes, as long as it is between consenting adults it is none of my 
business what you use in your bedroom.  I've always assumed you were a 
zippered leather face hood wearing kind of guy Richard, but that hasn't 
gotten in the way of our chummy chats has it?/ - curtisdeltablues


http://www.mail-archive.com/fairfieldlife/yahoogroups.com/msg133174.html 
http://www.mail-archive.com/fairfieldlife%40yahoogroups.com/msg133174.html




On 12/3/2014 9:19 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:

*/Just thought I'd change the title of this thread to better reflect 
Richard J. Williams' contributions to it./*


It looks like Barry got his buttons pushed, now he hates me. Go 
figure. But, this was kind of funny:


/Like most Texans, he probably believes that while going to SM 
clubs, dressing in black leather tie-me-up-and-fuck-me outfits 
(complete with ball gag), and being whipped by Miss Kitty while 
listening to Waylon Jennings records./ - TurquoiseB


http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/246688




[FairfieldLife] Re: It's All About Richard J. Williams, was The Lying Sack-Of-Shitting of FFL

2014-12-03 Thread curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 Decided to focus your troll routine on me have you Riichard? On the heels of 
me treating you decently by entering into a discussion with you? OK

This was selected out of an interesting discussion about power and sex. Like a 
giggling ten year old, you insist on taking the whole discussion out of its 
intellectual context and focus on certain words and phrases used in faux 
prudery in your attempt to make it look as if the discussion was on your own 
idiotic level instead of what the adults on the forum were talking about. You 
seem very uptight about discussions about sex, and always gravitate to the 
weirdest possible interpretation, fixating on some childish notion of what is 
being discussed.

I am comfortable with my own sexual nature and have good boundaries about he 
sexual behaviors of others. By inappropriately putting my old quotes out of 
context within a discussion of illegal and abhorrent abuse acts, you are trying 
to smear me with the stink of association. I will not let you do it. You want 
to go this way with me Richard? I am up for it. But don't think for a second 
that your agenda is not plain to me. You are acting as a malevolent prick 
toward me, and I reject everything you are attempting. It is unfriendly, stupid 
and immature.

My reference to a scene in Pulp Fiction below was an attempt to joke you out of 
your troll routine. But I see that being nice to you only eggs you on for your 
attack. Everything I said below I meant. I am liberal about people's sexual 
choices and you come off as a person who is very uncomfortable about the 
subject. You come off as squirrelly and untrustworthy.  You appear to be hiding 
something about your nature. I have no idea what it is, and can only resort to 
metaphors to describe how your focus on the weirdest part of any sexual 
reference here makes my skin crawl.

I understand what Barry wrote and why he wrote it. I do not understand you. 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :

 As long as we are reviewing contributions to FFL we should also include this 
little gem from Curtis:
 
 Yes, as long as it is between consenting adults it is none of my business 
what you use in your bedroom.  I've always assumed you were a zippered leather 
face hood wearing kind of guy Richard, but that hasn't gotten in the way of our 
chummy chats has it? - curtisdeltablues
 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/fairfieldlife/yahoogroups.com/msg133174.html 
http://www.mail-archive.com/fairfieldlife%40yahoogroups.com/msg133174.html
 
 
 
 On 12/3/2014 9:19 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
 

 Just thought I'd change the title of this thread to better reflect Richard J. 
Williams' contributions to it. 
 It looks like Barry got his buttons pushed, now he hates me. Go figure. But, 
this was kind of funny:
 
 Like most Texans, he probably believes that while going to SM clubs, 
dressing in black leather tie-me-up-and-fuck-me outfits (complete with ball 
gag), and being whipped by Miss Kitty while listening to Waylon Jennings 
records. - TurquoiseB
 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/246688 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/246688
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: It's All About Richard J. Williams, was The Lying Sack-Of-Shitting of FFL

2014-12-03 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]

On 12/3/2014 6:29 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:

Decided to focus your troll routine on me have you Riichard? 


You seem to be really taking this seriously - it's all about Richard, 
not Barry. Go figure.


On the heels of me treating you decently by entering into a discussion 
with you? OK


OK, since we both work in schools, lets discus how decently you've 
treated me:


/Yes, as long as it is between consenting adults it is none of my 
business what you use in your bedroom.  I've always assumed you were a 
zippered leather face hood wearing kind of guy Richard, but that hasn't 
gotten in the way of our chummy chats has it?/ - curtisdeltablues


This was selected out of an interesting discussion about power and 
sex. Like a giggling ten year old, you insist on taking the whole 
discussion out of its intellectual context and focus on certain words 
and phrases used in faux prudery in your attempt to make it look as if 
the discussion was on your own idiotic level instead of what the 
adults on the forum were talking about. You seem very uptight about 
discussions about sex, and always gravitate to the weirdest possible 
interpretation, fixating on some childish notion of what is being 
discussed.


Alright, lets talk about power and sex:

/Exempted with be dog collars worn as is traditional by submissives, as 
long as they are accompanied by their masters. (all ball gags should be 
rubber only)./ - curtisdeltablues


I am comfortable with my own sexual nature and have good boundaries 
about he sexual behaviors of others. By inappropriately putting my old 
quotes out of context within a discussion of illegal and abhorrent 
abuse acts, you are trying to smear me with the stink of association. 
I will not let you do it. You want to go this way with me Richard? I 
am up for it. But don't think for a second that your agenda is not 
plain to me. You are acting as a malevolent prick toward me, and I 
reject everything you are attempting. It is unfriendly, stupid and 
immature.


My agenda is real simple - humiliate posers and hypocrites using their 
own words. /Any statement, when taken to extremes, will be found to be 
self-contradictory./ Share understands this, why can't a philosophy 
major with a degree from MUM understand it? It's a classic debating 
theme going back to Socrates and Nagarjuna.


My reference to a scene in Pulp Fiction below was an attempt to joke 
you out of your troll routine. But I see that being nice to you only 
eggs you on for your attack. Everything I said below I meant. I am 
liberal about people's sexual choices and you come off as a person who 
is very uncomfortable about the subject. 


So, it's a joke. Why can't I make a joke, Curtis? You dumb shit - I'm 
trying to cheer you on! What you said WAS funny, until you got all 
serious on us yesterday.


/What you thought I was gunna miss a chance for a ball gag joke?  Not a 
chance!/ - curtisdeltablues


You come off as squirrelly and untrustworthy.  You appear to be hiding 
something about your nature. I have no idea what it is, and can only 
resort to metaphors to describe how your focus on the weirdest part of 
any sexual reference here makes my skin crawl.


Cut the bullshit, Curtis - and just fess up to your own metaphors!

/Yes, as long as it is between consenting adults it is none of my 
business what you use in your bedroom. I've always assumed you were a 
zippered leather face hood wearing kind of guy Richard.../ - 
curtisdeltablues


Barry is such a large target I just can't see how he put one over on a 
smart guy like you. Do you have any comments to make about why and how 
Barry hoaxed you big time with the recent button-pushing contest? It 
sort of looks like it was a joke Barry pulled on Raunchydog.


/That reply was a joke, Share, just as she claims the post I was 
replying to was. As for anyone from the world of government or law 
enforcement wanting to watch you or anyone on this group just because 
they're on this group, that's just self-important paranoia from 
cultists, as usual./- TurquoiseB, 12/2/20014


I understand what Barry wrote and why he wrote it. I do not understand 
you. 


It sounds kind of complicated what Barry did - posting a joke and then 
escalating it to the point where he may have put his whole family in 
actual danger, just so he could lord over everyone here with the threat 
of police action if they don't like what he said. It's the ultimate 
thought-stopper.


I'm not at all against a neighborhood watch and reporting perverts in 
the playground, but social media is probably not the place to trick us 
by planting false flags just to get angry responses.


As for me, it's not very complicated. It was kind of funny and it is fun 
to quote people in order to point out their cognitive dissonance, 
especially when they attack me for no apparent reason or because of my 
birth circumstances.


But, don't we agree that Barry went over the line?

We are not even supposed to be posting adult graphic