--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But Judy, did you notice the lack of a good copy edit? The Times is
getting hopeless in that area. (Usually, the maharishi, lower
case,
but twice the Maharishi, upper case.)
Yup, I noticed! I wonder whether the copy
On Feb 7, 2008, at 5:15 PM, feste37 wrote:
But Judy, did you notice the lack of a good copy edit? The Times is
getting hopeless in that area. (Usually, the maharishi, lower case,
but twice the Maharishi, upper case.)
Is it possible that web publication, being more expedient and
immediate,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, william108wm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/arts/music/07yogi.html?
scp=3sq=maharishist=nyt
That's a *lovely* article. Almost makes up for
the crummy NYT obit! Many thanks.
But Judy, did you notice the lack of a good copy edit? The Times is
getting hopeless in that area. (Usually, the maharishi, lower case,
but twice the Maharishi, upper case.)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
