I am sure there are other summaries of the rise and fall of the Roman empire.
Languages change over time, some vanish, some hang on in niche markets. Latin
is used at the Vatican, in medicine and biology. Sanskrit is not spoken any
more except by a few scholars, except for pundits who probably
From: anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
I am sure there are other summaries of the rise and fall of the Roman
empire. Languages change over time, some vanish, some hang on in niche markets.
Latin is used at the Vatican, in medicine and biology. Sanskrit is
It's funny how Paul Simon can do that, I saw the link to the song and read the
lyrics before reading the bit you wrote and it transported me too, I was
sitting here in quiet revery for about 5 minutes. Go figure.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
Don't look
Barry,
That's the first time I've seen the lyrics of that song in print. Those guys
were geniuses and ahead of their time. But we do have rap now which is another
story...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: anartaxius@... [FairfieldLife]
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Xeno,
The Romans back then were worshipping pagan gods. I tend to think that the
people were accepting them as part of the state religion, but not because they
believed in them. The educated Romans more likely knew about Greek
Xeno,
Thanks for your thorough analysis. Perhaps, you can summarize for us the rise
and fall of the Roman Empire. And, why did Latin die as a language despite its
apparent usefulness and application in the ancient known world?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :
Curtis,
There are similarities between Maharishi's concept of the unified field to the
teachings of Jesus about the kingdom of God. Both are fields that can be
experienced personally by all human beings. These teachers taught that this
Field is the source of being and of all creation.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Curtis,
There are similarities between Maharishi's concept of the unified field to the
teachings of Jesus about the kingdom of God. Both are fields that can be
experienced personally by all human beings. These teachers taught that
Xeno,
The Romans back then were worshipping pagan gods. I tend to think that the
people were accepting them as part of the state religion, but not because they
believed in them. The educated Romans more likely knew about Greek philosophy
but regarded it more as an intellectual pursuit
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Curtis,
There are similarities between Maharishi's concept of the unified field to the
teachings of Jesus about the kingdom of God. Both are fields that can be
experienced personally by all human beings. These teachers taught that
I think I mis-attributed this to Michael first time around. I would really
enjoy any insights into Tony Nader that you would like to share.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jamesalan735@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
snip
Here is a way
C: What is missing here is an explanation of why anyone should accept that the
experiences people have in meditation are in fact an experience of a
trans-personal reality. This gap if filled for Maharishi by the use of
Mahvakyas and exposure to a specific teaching that convinces a person that
What sucks for the vacuum cleaner is that it was created from other stuff - and
it's in a constant state of flux - meaning it's subject to modification, and in
fact, is falling apart right before your eyes. Imagine sitting on the edge of
a wild camp fire where flames and sparks are sporting
From: inmadi...@hotmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 5:48 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Origin of the Universe and Species
A few thoughts that may lead nowhere . . . At least some
01010011011001110010011100100001
A few thoughts that may lead nowhere . . . At least some of the experiences we
have, for example looking at the moon, are stored somehow in the brain. We
know they are stored because we can recall them later.Also, if I first wish
for a turkey sub but then prefer a veggie burrito, these
Re If transcendental c-ness is a possible experience, lets describe as 'being
aware of being aware', then, how would this experience be stored?:
It wouldn't be stored! According to MMY the experiences we have of
transcending are really just the experiences we have at the edges as we slip
This was not quite what I was getting at, but I will give it another shot. In
my office on the floor here is a vacuum cleaner. It sucks up dust, etc. But it
also has another property: being, it has existence. It has being and it sucks
dust and collects it in a bag. Now this seemingly other
: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:21 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Origin of the Universe and Species
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jamesalan735@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
snip
Here is a way to test his seriousness. Answer
Xeno,
Without looking up the specific points made by Aristotle, Plato, and Aquinas,
I would say the absolute is the same as Being, which is the prime mover in
metaphysical analysis. But this point of view, although logical and
intellectual, may not satisfy most people.
I prefer to take
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Origin of the Universe and Species
I would love to hear what Tony said. It wouldn't surprise me if he had the
same intellectual qualms Larry Domash did about how Maharishi played fast and
loose with their disciplines.
When I asked Larry personally about
12, 2015 3:21 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Origin of the Universe and Species
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jamesalan735@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
snip
Here is a way to test his seriousness. Answer this question: Did
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Xeno,
I using the word absolute as the the unified field, the consciousness beyond
the human perceptions.
John, you have been keeping this conversation going, especially with Curtis,
who seems to be on a roll these past couple of
swallowed up by the Movement up front.
From: curtisdeltablues@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Origin of the Universe and Species
I would love to hear what Tony
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jamesalan735@... wrote :
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
snip
Here is a way to test his seriousness. Answer this question: Did Maharishi mean
the connection between the unified field in physics to be an analogy, or
! Lets hear what they both had to say please!
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2015 3:21 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Origin of the Universe and Species
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jamesalan735
Xeno,
I using the word absolute as the the unified field, the consciousness beyond
the human perceptions. It is the the Atman, Chat, Chit, and Ananda in the
vedas. It is the Being mentioned by Aristotle and Plato. But Maharishi has
explained it more explicitly as Bliss. It is the ipsum
Curtis,
To answer your question, IMO Maharishi would have said that the unified field
and physics were used as an analogy. He stated in the past that he wants to
convey the ancient vedic wisdom in modern scientific terms.
Also, I don't believe most people outside of the TM circle would
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Curtis,
It's obvious that Maharishi was trying resolve any of the differences from the
traditional knowledge from the vedas with the current scientific understanding
and discoveries up until the time of his death. I believe he was
John,
I seldom watch videos posted on FFL for the reason they take too much time to
watch. I can scan and read a post much faster, and I am interested in what
people say that comes from their own minds, with the exception of notable
quotations from others or a still photograph or two.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues@... wrote :
snip
Here is a way to test his seriousness. Answer this question: Did Maharishi mean
the connection between the unified field in physics to be an analogy, or was he
equating the two? Try to make a case for your choice. If you
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Salyavin,
Maharishi was saying that the universe is part of the creative intelligence of
the unified field.
Ah yes, I noted that under the usual sap bollocks the other 99.99% of it
was the claim that knowledge is different
In Maharishi's version of the Hindu cosmology, all beings are dissolved with
the dissolution of creation in the Mahapralaya at the end of the Yuga cycles.
The only exception according to Maharishi is a person who has achieved,not just
a celestial nervous system, but an absolute nervous
FYI, Maharishi's version of Hindu cosmology is pretty stock. Much of
it derived from the Puranas. But if you were a strict TM'er then you
didn't look across the fence or like I did buy the 4 book set of the
Shiva Puranas I spotted at the Theosophical Society or go through the
stacks at the
Curtis,
It's obvious that Maharishi was trying resolve any of the differences from the
traditional knowledge from the vedas with the current scientific understanding
and discoveries up until the time of his death. I believe he was trying to
show how the concept of the Brahman could create
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Curtis,
It's obvious that Maharishi was trying resolve any of the differences from the
traditional knowledge from the vedas with the current scientific understanding
and discoveries up until the time of his death. I believe he was
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :
FYI, Maharishi's version of Hindu cosmology is pretty stock.
C: Yes I agree. I was referring to his version because depending on which
scripture you read you get different spins on the story of creation.
Much of it derived from
Xeno,
As seen in the video that was posted, it was apparent that Maharishi knew the
inherent problems in the scientific methodologies for recognizing the truth.
They will undoubtedly bring conclusions that are completely different from
those who understand the absolute field through their
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq@... wrote :
Xeno,
As seen in the video that was posted, it was apparent that Maharishi knew the
inherent problems in the scientific methodologies for recognizing the truth.
They will undoubtedly bring conclusions that are completely different
Salyavin,
Maharishi was saying that the universe is part of the creative intelligence of
the unified field. Similarly, he does not say that the origin of species is
completely random. Rather, the evolution of species is based on the creative
intelligence of the unified field as well.
40 matches
Mail list logo
