On 12/12/2013 9:56 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
*/Absolutely. You can always tell the 'bots from the humans because
they're the ones who keep replying to posts from people who don't
reply to them. What would do that *but* a 'bot? :-)/*
So, I don't know how you'd know this, since on your own testimony,
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
That's what I was afraid you meant.
Share explained:
> Judy and noozguru, I simply meant what percentage of time on Internet is
> that of humans and that of robots.
Share, lets you and I try this that yifu posted. Maybe after
That's what I was afraid you meant.
Share explained:
> Judy and noozguru, I simply meant what percentage of time on Internet is
> that of humans and that of robots.
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 1:21 PM, "authfriend@..."
wrote:
What's "Internet time"?
Share wondered:
Judy and noozguru, I simply meant what percentage of time on Internet is that
of humans and that of robots.
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 1:21 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
What's "Internet time"?
Share wondered:
> Similiarly, Judy, what I'd really like to know is what percenta
Um, thanks, but I don't think that's what Share had in mind, Bhairitu.
Bhairitu wrote:
An 10 base time idea by Swatch that never caught on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time
Supposedly it would make it easier to calculate th
An 10 base time idea by Swatch that never caught on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time
Supposedly it would make it easier to calculate the time in other
countries. However these days the move because of the Internet is to
drop time zones altogether and just use UTC for the enti
What's "Internet time"?
Share wondered:
> Similiarly, Judy, what I'd really like to know is what percentage of
> Internet time is from the 'bots and and what percentage from us humans.
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 12:40 PM, "authfriend@..."
wrote:
What you want to ask, Share,
Similiarly, Judy, what I'd really like to know is what percentage of Internet
time is from the 'bots and and what percentage from us humans.
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 12:40 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
What you want to ask, Share, is not whether "942 members of FFL are bots"
What you want to ask, Share, is not whether "942 members of FFL are bots" (or
whether any members of FFL are bots, for that matter) but whether 61.5 percent
of visits to FFL are made by bots. There's no way for us to know that (although
the answer is almost certainly not, given what bots are for
When one authors a web site you put in a robots.txt file which supposed
to keep bots out of areas of your board which are not relevant or you
don't want snooping around in.
On 12/12/2013 08:24 AM, Share Long wrote:
Judy and turq, I'm still amazed by that 61.5 statistic. And it was
interesting
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
>
> turq, does this mean that 942 members of FFL are bots?!
Absolutely. You can always tell the 'bots from the humans because they're the
ones who keep replying to posts from people who
Judy and turq, I'm still amazed by that 61.5 statistic. And it was interesting
to me to translate that into the everyday context of FFL. I wonder if there are
any real 'bots who at least visit here.
On Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:18 AM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
You see, accord
You see, according to Barry, no post commenting on something he has said has
any meaning unless he validates it by responding to it. IOW, it's entirely up
to Barry whether one is a bot or not. ;-)
Barry bites:
> turq, does this mean that 942 members of FFL are bots?!
< < Absolutely. You can
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
>
> turq, does this mean that 942 members of FFL are bots?!
Absolutely. You can always tell the 'bots from the humans because
they're the ones who keep replying to posts from people who don't reply
to them. What would do that *but* a 'bot?
14 matches
Mail list logo
