[FairfieldLife] Re: Pandit-Projekt/ update.

2011-04-29 Thread Buck
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" wrote: > > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] > On Behalf Of Tom Pall > Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 11:58 AM > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Pandit-Projekt/ update. > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Pandit-Projekt/ update.

2011-04-29 Thread Buck
> > It is interesting to see who the principle people are inside with this memo. > It's been nearly three years since they took the reins of TM from Maharishi. > Going forward, is anything really being done differently or is it just > business as usual? How is it going? > > > > > > > > -

[FairfieldLife] Re: Pandit-Projekt/ update.

2011-04-25 Thread whynotnow7
are off. > > --- On Mon, 4/25/11, Buck wrote: > > > From: Buck > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Pandit-Projekt/ update. > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Date: Monday, April 25, 2011, 12:49 PM > > It is interesting to see who the > > princ

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Pandit-Projekt/ update.

2011-04-25 Thread Peter
ck > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Pandit-Projekt/ update. > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Date: Monday, April 25, 2011, 12:49 PM > It is interesting to see who the > principle people are inside with this memo.  It's been > nearly three years since they took the reins of TM from >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Pandit-Projekt/ update.

2011-04-25 Thread Buck
It is interesting to see who the principle people are inside with this memo. It's been nearly three years since they took the reins of TM from Maharishi. Going forward, is anything really being done differently or is it just business as usual? How is it going? > > > --- In FairfieldLife@ya

[FairfieldLife] Re: Pandit-Projekt/ update.

2011-04-25 Thread Buck
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall wrote: > > 2011/4/18 merlin > > > > > > >*Pandit-Projekt* > > > > > > > > > Wonder why the TMO felt it necessary to include this part? > > > *Transparency of the money flow* > Time and again we are - even in the conference and then - asked ab