[FairfieldLife] Re: Slight revision to interface...

2006-06-09 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hey! I take back part of my rant. The 'noob' in > > question > > *was* assigned to work on the Search engine, and > > seems > > to have done a pretty good job of improving it. > > Praise > > where praise is due

[FairfieldLife] Re: Slight revision to interface...

2006-06-09 Thread gullible fool
> Hey! I take back part of my rant. The 'noob' in > question > *was* assigned to work on the Search engine, and > seems > to have done a pretty good job of improving it. > Praise > where praise is due. It has its bugs. If you search for '7.1', it will replace your search string with '7 1' and fa

[FairfieldLife] Re: Slight revision to interface...

2006-06-08 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: > > > > > > > > Seems that they

[FairfieldLife] Re: Slight revision to interface...

2006-06-08 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: > > > > > > Seems that they've reverted to the prev/next link-buttons, rather > than newest/newer/ >

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Slight revision to interface...

2006-06-08 Thread Bhairitu
TurquoiseB wrote: >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Seems that they've reverted to the prev/next link-buttons, >>rather than newest/newer/older/oldest link-buttons, so >>they're going back to a certain consistency at least for >>the most-used co

[FairfieldLife] Re: Slight revision to interface...

2006-06-08 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: > > > > And now the message list uses that clunky thing. Someone is > > using he entire Yahoo community as an alpha-tester, it seems... > > Exactly. Rather than

[FairfieldLife] Re: Slight revision to interface...

2006-06-08 Thread Nelson
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: > > > > Seems that they've reverted to the prev/next link-buttons, rather than newest/newer/ > older/ > > oldest link-buttons, so they're going back to a certain co

[FairfieldLife] Re: Slight revision to interface...

2006-06-07 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote: > > > > And now the message list uses that clunky thing. Someone is > > using he entire Yahoo community as an alpha-tester, it seems... > > Exactly. Rather than

[FairfieldLife] Re: Slight revision to interface...

2006-06-07 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And now the message list uses that clunky thing. Someone is > using he entire Yahoo community as an alpha-tester, it seems... Exactly. Rather than working on what's broke (the search engine, the inability of the defaul

[FairfieldLife] Re: Slight revision to interface...

2006-06-07 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems that they've reverted to the prev/next link-buttons, rather than > newest/newer/ older/ > oldest link-buttons, so they're going back to a certain consistency at least > for the most- used > commands. > And now

[FairfieldLife] Re: Slight revision to interface...

2006-06-07 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems that they've reverted to the prev/next link-buttons, > rather than newest/newer/older/oldest link-buttons, so > they're going back to a certain consistency at least for > the most-used commands. Now if they'd j