--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(P.S. It looks as though you've apparently chosen yet again
to ignore the main point of the post: the distinction between
sattva and purusha, or judging it's a really, really *good*
movie vs. actually freeing oneself
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
(P.S. It looks as though you've apparently chosen yet again
to ignore the main point of the post: the distinction between
sattva and purusha, or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
snip... the distinction between sattva and
purusha, or judging it's a really, really *good* movie vs.
actually
freeing oneself from belief in the
new.morning wrote:
Do people believe or experience that the
practice of TM (and/or siddhis) improves
day to day behavior and activity?
http://www.enlightenedsentencing.org/index.htm
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
(P.S. It looks as though you've apparently chosen yet again
to ignore the main point of the post: the distinction between
sattva and purusha, or
Actually my question was quite simple. Do people believe or experience
that the practice of TM (and/or siddhis) improves day to day behavior
and activity? Any takers?
(The intent of the question had nothing to do with debates about
altered states, enlightenment, etc.)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
(P.S. It looks as though you've apparently chosen yet again
to ignore
On Nov 14, 2007, at 8:54 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
And accurate.
For example, you claim to have perfect knowledge and
the ability to act from the level of the laws of nature,
and you're now at 38 posts, AFTER having been told that
you were at the limit some time ago by Sal.
Up to 40 now by my
New.Morn., yes, based on my own experience, I feel that it does. However,
since there's not
been any control to measure against, that's just pure gut feeling.
**
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually my question was quite simple. Do people
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007, at 8:54 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
And accurate.
For example, you claim to have perfect knowledge and
the ability to act from the level of the laws of nature,
and you're now at 38 posts, AFTER
You're a sham, Jim.
Sal Sunshine wrote:
Bingo.
do.rflex wrote:
Double Bingo !!
Leave Jim alone - he has just as much right to post
here as you do. Maybe if you practiced TM, you would
exhibit better behavior on FFL.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually my question was quite simple. Do people believe or experience
that the practice of TM (and/or siddhis) improves day to day behavior
and activity? Any takers?
(The intent of the question had nothing to do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
New Morning et al:
Actually my question was quite simple. Do people believe or experience
that the practice of TM (and/or siddhis) improves day to day behavior
and activity? Any takers?
Tom T;
My experience is Yes. That does not mean that from time to time
certain people experience me as someone
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I like that analogy-- it works. After working with my mind to
refine, refine, refine, and discriminate, the most difficult thing
to get for me was the letting go, into enlightenment. It occurred
because I had
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007, at 8:54 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
And accurate.
For example, you claim to have perfect knowledge and
the ability to act
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@ wrote:
(P.S. It looks as though you've apparently chosen yet again
to ignore the main point of the post: the distinction between
sattva and purusha, or judging it's a really, really *good*
movie vs. actually freeing oneself
---Right, the false you has died, but the relative you still exists.
It's the Rorybody.as opposed to other bodies, for example the
Bushbody, the MMYbody, etc... The remaining questions regarding
relativity revolve around the importance given to bodies. One can
simply dismiss them (things)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
snip Isn't the whole premise of Maharishi's vision
that TM is supposed to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin
jflanegi@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I detest that expression enlightened behavior because it attempts
to signify a state which is all about eternal, universal immortal
freedom and categorize it so that the dualistic mind can make it
comprehensible.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
wrote:
I detest that expression enlightened behavior because it
attempts
to signify a state which is all about eternal, universal
immortal
On Nov 13, 2007, at 11:43 AM, new.morning wrote:
Right. But you said you never heard of the term -- implying that you
are unfamiliar with MMY's and the TMO's premise that TM etc
significantly improves behavior, social interactions, and actions .
Are you unfamiliar with this premise? That is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's more than a premise IMO. Hang around enough saints and you
begin
to recognize a spontaneous quality that can only be termed virtues
or virtuous. It's the Natural Condition. Co-emergent with that
recognition is our
On Nov 13, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's more than a premise IMO. Hang around enough saints and you
begin
to recognize a spontaneous quality that can only be termed virtues
or virtuous. It's the Natural Condition.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
It's more than a premise IMO. Hang around enough saints and you
begin
to recognize a spontaneous quality
Vaj, why don't you read my response to Curtis' response to Bronte's essay
regarding behavior and TM? a
Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's more than a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
It's more than a premise IMO. Hang around enough saints and you
begin
to recognize a spontaneous quality
On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:17 PM, Angela Mailander wrote:
Vaj, why don't you read my response to Curtis' response to Bronte's
essay regarding behavior and TM? a
Uh, Do I have to? If I have the time, I'll try, OK?
I'm not a part time playwright, so don't expect me to bear so much
drama in a
On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
Speaking of editing, perhaps you missed the editor's gentle hint the
first time around: the possessive of it is its -- not it's,
which is only used by the literate as the contraction of it is.
Yes and my understanding (perhaps not of publishing
On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:17 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
It's more than a premise IMO. Hang around enough saints and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
Speaking of editing, perhaps you missed the editor's gentle hint the
first time around: the possessive of it is its -- not it's,
which is only used by the literate as the
On Nov 13, 2007, at 10:00 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
Speaking of editing, perhaps you missed the editor's gentle hint
the
first time around: the possessive of it is its -- not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:17 PM, jim_flanegin wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 6:51 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:41 PM, Rory Goff wrote:
Speaking of editing, perhaps you missed the editor's gentle
hint the
first time around: the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As to your statement, Vaj, Yes and my understanding (perhaps not of
publishing genre) was that it's ok per casual anglais, Judy would
like to tell you (and I heartily agree) that it's not OK no matter
how casual your anglais,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip... the distinction between sattva and
purusha, or judging it's a really, really *good* movie vs. actually
freeing oneself from belief in the movie. While I enjoy sattvic
behavior as much as the next guy, judging
38 matches
Mail list logo