[FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-25 Thread Jason

Could you name a few countries?

IMHO, dress diferences actually perpetuate, bias, prejudices
and discriminations, on a very subtle level, deep  in the
subconscious.

Where is Ann when I need her?

Nothing in the universe is static. We evolve and adapt to
everchanging conditions. Stasis means sure extinction. The
universe is an extremely dynamic place.  This is really a
survival issue.


 --- sharelong60 sharelong60@... wrote:

 Jason, there are countries where men and women dress in
 very similar ways. But those countries don't seem very
 egalitarian to me!

  From: Jason jedi_spock@...
 
  Share, discrimination, bias, prejudices continue to exist on
  very subtle levels.  There are invisible glass ceilings.  It
  can take generations to wipe them out.
 
  An unisex dress code (specialy for children) in public
  spaces, I believe can play a role in creating a truly
  egalitarian society.
 
   --- sharelong60 sharelong60@.. wrote:
  
   Jason, your comment about unisex dress code kind of jumped
   out at me as did your linking that to an egalitarian
   society. Actually I'm still kind of baffled by it so don't
   even know what to ask except: can you say more?
  
From: Jason jedi_spock@...
   
The Chinese philosophy which speaks of Yin-Yang, two
equal energies mutually balancing each other is a far
superior philosophy to western philosophy and certain
aspects of indian philosophy.
   
Science itself says that male and female are equals but
different.
   
Yoga is essentialy balance, ie life within parameters.
   
Any society or culture that is imbalanced will
eventually destroy itself.  Nature hates imbalances and
always tries to reach an equilibrium.  I have always
believed that an unisex dresscode in public spaces, is
an important way to bring in a truly egalitarian
society.
   
If a republic is small, it is destroyed by a foreign
force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal
vice.
   
~French philosopher, Montesquieu
   

 --- s3raphita s3raphita@.. wrote:

 Ah, yes! C.S. Lewis and Mere Christianity. The book was
 originally a series of talks Lewis gave on BBC Radio in
 the 1940s. At one point he brought up the delicate topic
 of sex. Lewis maintained that in his youth he had been all
 in favour of a naturalattitude towards sexual matters
 but - he said - surely contemporary attitudes towards sex
 were anything but natural. There was something
 positively diseased about them. As an example, Lewis asked
 us to consider a striptease show. What are we make of such
 an exhibition? Well, he said, imagine you had arrived in a
 strange country where you discovered that the inhabitants
 were in the habit of paying to gather in front of a
 display of food that was hidden from view. Then, slowly,
 the appetising meal was revealed to the gaze of the
 citizens. Wouldn't you then conclude that something had
 gone seriously wrong with the appetites of the denizens of
 this imaginary nation? Well, isn't the same true of our
 attitudes towards sex? We have a diseased approach, he
 concluded.

 A listener to the programme later wrote in to say: if I
 came across a country such as you describe I would assume
 that the people were starving. What a splendid response!
 The implication being that men frequent strip shows
 because they are sex-starved.

 Now take a look around you at the 24/7 porn culture we
 inhabit. Was Lewis right or the anonymous listener?




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-25 Thread Share Long
Jason, I agree that the universe is dynamic and ever changing. I would add that 
dynamic balance is the ideal. How about dynamic egalitarianism? And maybe 
that's the phase we're in now. Is sameness equality? I see your point about 
clothing differences. But I also think that FORCED sameness is not beneficial 
for human growth. I was thinking of countries wherein both men and women wear 
long robes or both men and women wear loose pants and long tops.





 From: Jason jedi_sp...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 5:35 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  

Could you name a few countries?

IMHO, dress diferences actually perpetuate, bias, prejudices 
and discriminations, on a very subtle level, deep  in the 
subconscious.

Where is Ann when I need her?

Nothing in the universe is static. We evolve and adapt to 
everchanging conditions. Stasis means sure extinction. The 
universe is an extremely dynamic place.  This is really a 
survival issue.


 --- sharelong60 sharelong60@... wrote:
 
 Jason, there are countries where men and women dress in  
 very similar ways. But those countries don't seem very  
 egalitarian to me!
 
  From: Jason jedi_spock@...
 
  Share, discrimination, bias, prejudices continue to exist on
  very subtle levels.  There are invisible glass ceilings.  It
  can take generations to wipe them out.
  
  An unisex dress code (specialy for children) in public
  spaces, I believe can play a role in creating a truly
  egalitarian society.
  
   --- sharelong60 sharelong60@.. wrote:
   
   Jason, your comment about unisex dress code kind of jumped
   out at me as did your linking that to an egalitarian
   society. Actually I'm still kind of baffled by it so don't
   even know what to ask except: can you say more?
   
From: Jason jedi_spock@...

The Chinese philosophy which speaks of Yin-Yang, two 
equal energies mutually balancing each other is a far 
superior philosophy to western philosophy and certain 
aspects of indian philosophy.

Science itself says that male and female are equals but
different.

Yoga is essentialy balance, ie life within parameters.

Any society or culture that is imbalanced will
eventually destroy itself.  Nature hates imbalances and
always tries to reach an equilibrium.  I have always 
believed that an unisex dresscode in public spaces, is 
an important way to bring in a truly egalitarian 
society.

If a republic is small, it is destroyed by a foreign 
force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal 
vice.

~French philosopher, Montesquieu


 --- s3raphita s3raphita@.. wrote:
 
 Ah, yes! C.S. Lewis and Mere Christianity. The book was
 originally a series of talks Lewis gave on BBC Radio in
 the 1940s. At one point he brought up the delicate topic
 of sex. Lewis maintained that in his youth he had been all
 in favour of a naturalattitude towards sexual matters
 but - he said - surely contemporary attitudes towards sex
 were anything but natural. There was something
 positively diseased about them. As an example, Lewis asked
 us to consider a striptease show. What are we make of such
 an exhibition? Well, he said, imagine you had arrived in a
 strange country where you discovered that the inhabitants
 were in the habit of paying to gather in front of a
 display of food that was hidden from view. Then, slowly,
 the appetising meal was revealed to the gaze of the
 citizens. Wouldn't you then conclude that something had
 gone seriously wrong with the appetites of the denizens of
 this imaginary nation? Well, isn't the same true of our
 attitudes towards sex? We have a diseased approach, he
 concluded.
 
 A listener to the programme later wrote in to say: if I
 came across a country such as you describe I would assume
 that the people were starving. What a splendid response!
 The implication being that men frequent strip shows
 because they are sex-starved.
 
 Now take a look around you at the 24/7 porn culture we
 inhabit. Was Lewis right or the anonymous listener?


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long
Seraphita, I think both CS Lewis and the listener are right. Continuing the 
food analogy, it's as if an essential nutrient has been missing from the diet 
for a long time and now the person is overindulging to make up for that 
deficit. But what is the nutrient that's being so feverishly sought via the 
porn industry? This helps me understand a little: my favorite tantric teacher 
David Deida once said that to a straight man, the female body is the most 
beautiful thing in the world. Anyway, we women aren't hardwired the same visual 
way but I think a parallel hunger in women shows up in the popularity of 
romance novels and mushy love songs and chick flicks. This all reminds me of 
something I read once, sorry can't remember the author at the moment: that men 
need sex to feel love and women need to feel love to have sex. Seems like one 
of life's little jests.

PS I know about CS Lewis only from the movie Shadowlands, based on his life, 
specifically his marriage.




 From: s3raph...@yahoo.com s3raph...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:33 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  
Ah, yes! C.S. Lewis and Mere Christianity. The book was originally a series of 
talks Lewis gave on BBC Radio in the 1940s. At one point he brought up the 
delicate topic of sex. Lewis maintained that in his youth he had been all in 
favour of a naturalattitude towards sexual matters but - he said - surely 
contemporary attitudes towards sex were anything but natural. There was 
something positively diseased about them. As an example, Lewis asked us to 
consider a striptease show. What are we make of such an exhibition? Well, he 
said, imagine you had arrived in a strange country where you discovered that 
the inhabitants were in the habit of paying to gather in front of a display of 
food that was hidden from view. Then, slowly, the appetising meal was revealed 
to the gaze of the citizens. Wouldn't you then conclude that something had gone 
seriously wrong with the appetites of the denizens of this imaginary nation? 
Well, isn't the same true of our attitudes
 towards sex? We have a diseased approach, he concluded.

A listener to the programme later wrote in to say: if I came across a country 
such as you describe I would assume that the people were starving. What a 
splendid response! The implication being that men frequent strip shows because 
they are sex-starved.

Now take a look around you at the 24/7 porn culture we inhabit. Was Lewis right 
or the anonymous listener? 


--- In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:


In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis calls pride “The Great Sin” for it 
“has been the chief cause of misery in every nation and every family 
since the world began… it was through Pride that the devil became the 
devil: Pride leads to every other vice.” We see in Walter’s case that it 
is his pride—an unwillingness to accept normal treatment, a refusal to 
be a charity case even when faced with his own impending death—that 
starts him on the path toward manufacturing meth. Pride is the catalyst 
that leads to all of Walter’s other sins.

Read more:

'The Theology of Breaking Bad'
http://www.fare-forward.com/the-theology-of-breaking-bad/
 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

 Seraphita, I think both CS Lewis and the listener are right.
 Continuing the food analogy, it's as if an essential nutrient
 has been missing from the diet for a long time and now the
 person is overindulging to make up for that deficit. But what
 is the nutrient that's being so feverishly sought via the porn
 industry? This helps me understand a little: my favorite
 tantric teacher David Deida once said that to a straight man,
 the female body is the most beautiful thing in the world.
 Anyway, we women aren't hardwired the same visual way
 but I think a parallel hunger in women shows up in the
 popularity of romance novels and mushy love songs and
 chick flicks.

As an example of the creative uses of context shifting I
wrote about in my last post, this reminded me of a recent
article quoting author Stephen King on the sad (in his eyes)
popularity of tweenager porn.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/sep/21/stephen-king-twilight-tween\
age-porn
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/sep/21/stephen-king-twilight-twee\
nage-porn

I agree with him completely, at least about Twilight.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long
turq, I don't find the writing in the Twilight novels that great. But I think 
it's a powerful retelling of the archetypal story of love between an immortal 
and a mortal, between God and human for us non atheists. In this sense, it's a 
story of surrender and unity to something greater than ourselves. Actually I 
think most romantic love stories are, on the deepest level, evoking the human 
yearning for unity with something more complete than ourselves. Also with 
regards to Twilight, perhaps a retelling of Beauty and the Beast, another 
archetypal love story. Maybe it's not an accident that the heroine is called 
Bella and the hero Edward calls himself a monster. Hopefully the archetypal 
aspects are also getting through to the teen audiences.





 From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 6:53 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:

 Seraphita, I think both CS Lewis and the listener are right. 
 Continuing the food analogy, it's as if an essential nutrient 
 has been missing from the diet for a long time and now the 
 person is overindulging to make up for that deficit. But what 
 is the nutrient that's being so feverishly sought via the porn 
 industry? This helps me understand a little: my favorite 
 tantric teacher David Deida once said that to a straight man, 
 the female body is the most beautiful thing in the world. 
 Anyway, we women aren't hardwired the same visual way 
 but I think a parallel hunger in women shows up in the 
 popularity of romance novels and mushy love songs and 
 chick flicks. 

As an example of the creative uses of context shifting I
wrote about in my last post, this reminded me of a recent
article quoting author Stephen King on the sad (in his eyes)
popularity of tweenager porn.

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/sep/21/stephen-king-twilight-tweenage-porn
 

I agree with him completely, at least about Twilight. 



 

[FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread turquoiseb
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, I don't find the writing in the Twilight novels 
 that great. But I think it's a powerful retelling of 
 the archetypal story of love between an immortal and 
 a mortal, between God and human for us non atheists. 
 In this sense, it's a story of surrender and unity to 
 something greater than ourselves. Actually I think 
 most romantic love stories are, on the deepest level, 
 evoking the human yearning for unity with something 
 more complete than ourselves. Also with regards to 
 Twilight, perhaps a retelling of Beauty and the Beast, 
 another archetypal love story. Maybe it's not an 
 accident that the heroine is called Bella and the 
 hero Edward calls himself a monster. Hopefully the 
 archetypal aspects are also getting through to the 
 teen audiences.

I can hardly speak as an expert, having made my
way through the first novel only because someone
was begging me to. It was like pulling my own teeth.

I later found criticisms of it that echoed what I
was feeling as I read. FAR from archetypal or
mythic, I found it to be the literary counterpart
of those creepy clubs in high schools where they
talk guys and gals into wearing virginity rings.

It was the mindset of the 1950s, with vampires and
the dangers of getting close to them taking the 
place of the dangers of...uh...SEX. It was preaching 
sublimation, and resisting of natural desires, and 
trying to elevate those things as if they were noble 
and wonderful. I didn't feel that was an appropriate 
message for teenagers, so I wasn't a fan. 

But obviously, tastes vary. What surprises me about
the whole Twilight thang are the number of *older*
women who fixate on it. 


 
  From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 6:53 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad
  
 
 
   
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
 
  Seraphita, I think both CS Lewis and the listener are right. 
  Continuing the food analogy, it's as if an essential nutrient 
  has been missing from the diet for a long time and now the 
  person is overindulging to make up for that deficit. But what 
  is the nutrient that's being so feverishly sought via the porn 
  industry? This helps me understand a little: my favorite 
  tantric teacher David Deida once said that to a straight man, 
  the female body is the most beautiful thing in the world. 
  Anyway, we women aren't hardwired the same visual way 
  but I think a parallel hunger in women shows up in the 
  popularity of romance novels and mushy love songs and 
  chick flicks. 
 
 As an example of the creative uses of context shifting I
 wrote about in my last post, this reminded me of a recent
 article quoting author Stephen King on the sad (in his eyes)
 popularity of tweenager porn.
 
 http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/sep/21/stephen-king-twilight-tweenage-pornÂ
  
 
 I agree with him completely, at least about Twilight.





[FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Jason

The Chinese philosophy which speaks of Yin-Yang, two equal
energies mutually balancing each other is a far superior
philosophy to western philosophy and certain aspects of
indian philosophy.

Seience itself says that male and female are equals but
different.

Yoga is essentialy balance, ie life within parameters.

Any society or culture that is imbalanced will eventually
destroy itself.  Nature hates imbalances and always tries to
reach an equilibrium.  I have always believed that an unisex
dresscode in public spaces, is an important way to bring in
a truly egalitarian society.

If a republic is small, it is destroyed by a foreign force;
if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal vice.

~French philosopher, Montesquieu


 --- s3raphita s3raphita@.. wrote:

 Ah, yes! C.S. Lewis and Mere Christianity. The book was
 originally a series of talks Lewis gave on BBC Radio in
 the 1940s. At one point he brought up the delicate topic
 of sex. Lewis maintained that in his youth he had been all
 in favour of a naturalattitude towards sexual matters
 but - he said - surely contemporary attitudes towards sex
 were anything but natural. There was something
 positively diseased about them. As an example, Lewis asked
 us to consider a striptease show. What are we make of such
 an exhibition? Well, he said, imagine you had arrived in a
 strange country where you discovered that the inhabitants
 were in the habit of paying to gather in front of a
 display of food that was hidden from view. Then, slowly,
 the appetising meal was revealed to the gaze of the
 citizens. Wouldn't you then conclude that something had
 gone seriously wrong with the appetites of the denizens of
 this imaginary nation? Well, isn't the same true of our
 attitudes towards sex? We have a diseased approach, he
 concluded.

 A listener to the programme later wrote in to say: if I
 came across a country such as you describe I would assume
 that the people were starving. What a splendid response!
 The implication being that men frequent strip shows
 because they are sex-starved.

 Now take a look around you at the 24/7 porn culture we
 inhabit. Was Lewis right or the anonymous listener?

  --- Pundister punditster@... wrote:
 
  In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis calls pride 'The Great
  Sin' for it 'has been the chief cause of misery in
  every nation and every family since the world began'¦ it
  was through Pride that the devil became the devil: Pride
  leads to every other vice.' We see in Walter' case that
  it is his pride' 'an unwillingness to accept normal
  treatment, a refusal to be a charity case even when
  faced with his own impending death' that starts him on
  the path toward manufacturing meth. Pride is the
  catalyst that leads to all of Walter's other sins.
 
  Read more:
 
  'The Theology of Breaking Bad'
  http://www.fare-forward.com/the-theology-of-breaking-bad/




Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long
emptybill, some view Jesus and Christianity as a step in the evolution of 
religion. And a Pisces step at that. Agape. Unconditional love. Can seem sappy 
when compared to more robust expressions of love. OTOH, with regards to Adam 
and Eve there is a similar concept of oh happy fall. Meaning that if they had 
not fallen, Christ would not have incarnated. Still not as robust as Satan's 
willingness to be, out of his unconquerable love for God, separate from God FOR 
ALL ETERNITY. Surely he must know that God's embrace encompasses even that!





 From: emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:14 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  
C.S. Lewis' quote - blah, blah, I'm so bad ...

This is just an iteration of the old protestant/roman catholic
theology of sin, guilt, redemption ... o god, o god, I know 
I done wrong but (gulf, gulp, sweat, sweat) now I wanna 
change.

Such b.s. 

This distorted view of human nature/god's nature 
goes back to the sniveling confessions of Augustine of Hippo.

However the pride of the evil one was much more colorfully 
described by Milton in Paradise Lost. 

However, Paradise Lost is just another iteration of the old 
theology.

More interesting is the Sufi revelation ... that Lucifer fell from 
his exalted angelic station because he so ecstatically loved 
God that he refused God's command to bow down to God's 
own vicar ... the earthy Adam. 

The reason? He could worship no one other than his chosen 
deity, his Ishta Devatah ... yhvh. 

The consequence? Out of unconquerable love, he subsists
upon the last command of this true love  be gone!

The Sufi's insist this is a much closer to the truth of gnosis 
than the pathetic ... Won't you come to the weeping Jesus
in your wickedly defiled heart? ... You stinking pile of filth!

 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis calls pride “The Great Sin” for it 
“has been the chief cause of misery in every nation and every family 
since the world began… it was through Pride that the devil became the 
devil: Pride leads to every other vice.” We see in Walter’s case that it 
is his pride—an unwillingness to accept normal treatment, a refusal to 
be a charity case even when faced with his own impending death—that 
starts him on the path toward manufacturing meth. Pride is the catalyst 
that leads to all of Walter’s other sins.

Read more:

'The Theology of Breaking Bad'
http://www.fare-forward.com/the-theology-of-breaking-bad/
 

Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long
Judy, why is that? What are you confused about? Are your beliefs so set in 
stone?





 From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  
Share observed: 

emptybill, some view Jesus and Christianity as a step in the evolution of 
religion.

One truly doesn't know whether to laugh or cry.

 

RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread authfriend













RE: Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread authfriend













Re: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long
Judy, since you're still confused, I'm asking what you meant by: one doesn't 
know whether to laugh or cry. 





 From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:31 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  
Share struggled: 

Judy, why is that? What are you confused about?

I believe I said one doesn't know whether to laugh or cry.

Are your beliefs so set in stone?

Which beliefs would those be, Share?






 From: authfriend@... authfriend@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:04 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  
Share observed: 

emptybill, some view Jesus and Christianity as a step in the evolution of 
religion.

One truly doesn't know whether to laugh or cry.



 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long
well turq, it turns out that Stephanie Meyers is a Mormon so maybe you are 
right about her attitude towards teen sex. I still appreciate its archetypal 
elements. Another one: the heroine torn between her immortal aspect as 
symbolized by the vampire and her animal aspect as symbolized by Jacob, the 
werewolf.





 From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:27 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, I don't find the writing in the Twilight novels 
 that great. But I think it's a powerful retelling of 
 the archetypal story of love between an immortal and 
 a mortal, between God and human for us non atheists. 
 In this sense, it's a story of surrender and unity to 
 something greater than ourselves. Actually I think 
 most romantic love stories are, on the deepest level, 
 evoking the human yearning for unity with something 
 more complete than ourselves. Also with regards to 
 Twilight, perhaps a retelling of Beauty and the Beast, 
 another archetypal love story. Maybe it's not an 
 accident that the heroine is called Bella and the 
 hero Edward calls himself a monster. Hopefully the 
 archetypal aspects are also getting through to the 
 teen audiences.

I can hardly speak as an expert, having made my
way through the first novel only because someone
was begging me to. It was like pulling my own teeth.

I later found criticisms of it that echoed what I
was feeling as I read. FAR from archetypal or
mythic, I found it to be the literary counterpart
of those creepy clubs in high schools where they
talk guys and gals into wearing virginity rings.

It was the mindset of the 1950s, with vampires and
the dangers of getting close to them taking the 
place of the dangers of...uh...SEX. It was preaching 
sublimation, and resisting of natural desires, and 
trying to elevate those things as if they were noble 
and wonderful. I didn't feel that was an appropriate 
message for teenagers, so I wasn't a fan. 

But obviously, tastes vary. What surprises me about
the whole Twilight thang are the number of *older*
women who fixate on it. 

 
  From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 6:53 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 
 
 
   
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
 
  Seraphita, I think both CS Lewis and the listener are right. 
  Continuing the food analogy, it's as if an essential nutrient 
  has been missing from the diet for a long time and now the 
  person is overindulging to make up for that deficit. But what 
  is the nutrient that's being so feverishly sought via the porn 
  industry? This helps me understand a little: my favorite 
  tantric teacher David Deida once said that to a straight man, 
  the female body is the most beautiful thing in the world. 
  Anyway, we women aren't hardwired the same visual way 
  but I think a parallel hunger in women shows up in the 
  popularity of romance novels and mushy love songs and 
  chick flicks. 
 
 As an example of the creative uses of context shifting I
 wrote about in my last post, this reminded me of a recent
 article quoting author Stephen King on the sad (in his eyes)
 popularity of tweenager porn.
 
 http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/sep/21/stephen-king-twilight-tweenage-pornÂ
  
 
 I agree with him completely, at least about Twilight.



 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long
Jason, your comment about unisex dress code kind of jumped out at me as did 
your linking that to an egalitarian society. Actually I'm still kind of baffled 
by it so don't even know what to ask except: can you say more?





 From: Jason jedi_sp...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:14 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  

The Chinese philosophy which speaks of Yin-Yang, two equal 
energies mutually balancing each other is a far superior 
philosophy to western philosophy and certain aspects of 
indian philosophy.

Seience itself says that male and female are equals but 
different.

Yoga is essentialy balance, ie life within parameters.

Any society or culture that is imbalanced will eventually 
destroy itself.  Nature hates imbalances and always tries to 
reach an equilibrium.  I have always believed that an unisex 
dresscode in public spaces, is an important way to bring in 
a truly egalitarian society.

If a republic is small, it is destroyed by a foreign force; 
if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal vice.

~French philosopher, Montesquieu


 --- s3raphita s3raphita@.. wrote:
 
 Ah, yes! C.S. Lewis and Mere Christianity. The book was  
 originally a series of talks Lewis gave on BBC Radio in  
 the 1940s. At one point he brought up the delicate topic  
 of sex. Lewis maintained that in his youth he had been all 
 in favour of a naturalattitude towards sexual matters  
 but - he said - surely contemporary attitudes towards sex 
 were anything but natural. There was something  
 positively diseased about them. As an example, Lewis asked 
 us to consider a striptease show. What are we make of such 
 an exhibition? Well, he said, imagine you had arrived in a 
 strange country where you discovered that the inhabitants 
 were in the habit of paying to gather in front of a  
 display of food that was hidden from view. Then, slowly,  
 the appetising meal was revealed to the gaze of the  
 citizens. Wouldn't you then conclude that something had 
 gone seriously wrong with the appetites of the denizens of 
 this imaginary nation? Well, isn't the same true of our  
 attitudes towards sex? We have a diseased approach, he  
 concluded.
 
 A listener to the programme later wrote in to say: if I  
 came across a country such as you describe I would assume 
 that the people were starving. What a splendid response!  
 The implication being that men frequent strip shows  
 because they are sex-starved.
 
 Now take a look around you at the 24/7 porn culture we  
 inhabit. Was Lewis right or the anonymous listener? 
 
  --- Pundister punditster@... wrote:
  
  In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis calls pride 'The Great 
  Sin' for it 'has been the chief cause of misery in 
  every nation and every family since the world began'¦ it 
  was through Pride that the devil became the devil: Pride 
  leads to every other vice.' We see in Walter' case that 
  it is his pride' 'an unwillingness to accept normal 
  treatment, a refusal to be a charity case even when 
  faced with his own impending death' that starts him on  
  the path toward manufacturing meth. Pride is the  
  catalyst that leads to all of Walter's other sins.
  
  Read more:
  
  'The Theology of Breaking Bad'
  http://www.fare-forward.com/the-theology-of-breaking-bad/


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Richard J. Williams
Now this is funny- a guy thinks a Twilight book is about sex between 
werewolves.


Go figure.

If you enjoyed the Twilight movies you may want to check out AMC's The 
Walking Dead.


Based on the comic book series of the same name, AMC's The Walking Dead 
tells the
story of a small group of survivors living in the aftermath of a zombie 
apocalypse. A

Golden Globe Award for Best Television Series, Drama.

The series follows a group of survivors, led by police officer Rick 
Grimes, who are traveling
in search of a safe and secure home. However, instead of the zombies, it 
is the living who

remain that truly become the walking dead.

And guess what - The Walking Dead is not about zombies at all. LoL!

Read more:

'At AMC, Zombies Topple Network TV'
New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/ 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/04/business/media/walking-dead-helps-solidify-amcs-ratings-success.html?pagewanted=all_r=0


'The Walking Dead,' Like All Zombie Stories: ... Not About Zombies at All'
The Atlantic:
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/ 
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/11/the-walking-dead-like-all-zombie-stories-not-about-zombies-at-all/265549/


On 9/24/2013 7:27 AM, turquoiseb wrote:


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, I don't find the writing in the Twilight novels
 that great. But I think it's a powerful retelling of
 the archetypal story of love between an immortal and
 a mortal, between God and human for us non atheists.
 In this sense, it's a story of surrender and unity to
 something greater than ourselves. Actually I think
 most romantic love stories are, on the deepest level,
 evoking the human yearning for unity with something
 more complete than ourselves. Also with regards to
 Twilight, perhaps a retelling of Beauty and the Beast,
 another archetypal love story. Maybe it's not an
 accident that the heroine is called Bella and the
 hero Edward calls himself a monster. Hopefully the
 archetypal aspects are also getting through to the
 teen audiences.

I can hardly speak as an expert, having made my
way through the first novel only because someone
was begging me to. It was like pulling my own teeth.

I later found criticisms of it that echoed what I
was feeling as I read. FAR from archetypal or
mythic, I found it to be the literary counterpart
of those creepy clubs in high schools where they
talk guys and gals into wearing virginity rings.

It was the mindset of the 1950s, with vampires and
the dangers of getting close to them taking the
place of the dangers of...uh...SEX. It was preaching
sublimation, and resisting of natural desires, and
trying to elevate those things as if they were noble
and wonderful. I didn't feel that was an appropriate
message for teenagers, so I wasn't a fan.

But obviously, tastes vary. What surprises me about
the whole Twilight thang are the number of *older*
women who fixate on it.

 
 From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 6:53 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad



 Â
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
 
  Seraphita, I think both CS Lewis and the listener are right.
  Continuing the food analogy, it's as if an essential nutrient
  has been missing from the diet for a long time and now the
  person is overindulging to make up for that deficit. But what
  is the nutrient that's being so feverishly sought via the porn
  industry? This helps me understand a little: my favorite
  tantric teacher David Deida once said that to a straight man,
  the female body is the most beautiful thing in the world.
  Anyway, we women aren't hardwired the same visual way
  but I think a parallel hunger in women shows up in the
  popularity of romance novels and mushy love songs and
  chick flicks.

 As an example of the creative uses of context shifting I
 wrote about in my last post, this reminded me of a recent
 article quoting author Stephen King on the sad (in his eyes)
 popularity of tweenager porn.

 
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/sep/21/stephen-king-twilight-tweenage-porn 



 I agree with him completely, at least about Twilight.







[FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread s3raphita













[FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Jason

Share, discrimination, bias, prejudices continue to exist on
very subtle levels.  There are invisible glass ceilings.  It
can take generations to wipe them out.

An unisex dress code (specialy for children) in public
spaces, I believe can play a role in creating a truly
egalitarian society.


 --- sharelong60 sharelong60@.. wrote:

 Jason, your comment about unisex dress code kind of jumped
 out at me as did your linking that to an egalitarian
 society. Actually I'm still kind of baffled by it so don't
 even know what to ask except: can you say more?

  From: Jason jedi_spock@...
 
  The Chinese philosophy which speaks of Yin-Yang, two
  equal energies mutually balancing each other is a far
  superior philosophy to western philosophy and certain
  aspects of indian philosophy.
 
  Science itself says that male and female are equals but
  different.
 
  Yoga is essentialy balance, ie life within parameters.
 
  Any society or culture that is imbalanced will
  eventually destroy itself.  Nature hates imbalances and
  always tries to reach an equilibrium.  I have always
  believed that an unisex dresscode in public spaces, is
  an important way to bring in a truly egalitarian
  society.
 
  If a republic is small, it is destroyed by a foreign
  force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal
  vice.
 
  ~French philosopher, Montesquieu
 

--- s3raphita s3raphita@.. wrote:
  
   Ah, yes! C.S. Lewis and Mere Christianity. The book was
   originally a series of talks Lewis gave on BBC Radio in
   the 1940s. At one point he brought up the delicate topic
   of sex. Lewis maintained that in his youth he had been all
   in favour of a naturalattitude towards sexual matters
   but - he said - surely contemporary attitudes towards sex
   were anything but natural. There was something
   positively diseased about them. As an example, Lewis asked
   us to consider a striptease show. What are we make of such
   an exhibition? Well, he said, imagine you had arrived in a
   strange country where you discovered that the inhabitants
   were in the habit of paying to gather in front of a
   display of food that was hidden from view. Then, slowly,
   the appetising meal was revealed to the gaze of the
   citizens. Wouldn't you then conclude that something had
   gone seriously wrong with the appetites of the denizens of
   this imaginary nation? Well, isn't the same true of our
   attitudes towards sex? We have a diseased approach, he
   concluded.
  
   A listener to the programme later wrote in to say: if I
   came across a country such as you describe I would assume
   that the people were starving. What a splendid response!
   The implication being that men frequent strip shows
   because they are sex-starved.
  
   Now take a look around you at the 24/7 porn culture we
   inhabit. Was Lewis right or the anonymous listener?



  --- Pundister punditster@... wrote:
 
  In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis calls pride 'The Great
  Sin' for it 'has been the chief cause of misery in
  every nation and every family since the world began'¦ it
  was through Pride that the devil became the devil: Pride
  leads to every other vice.' We see in Walter' case that
  it is his pride' 'an unwillingness to accept normal
  treatment, a refusal to be a charity case even when
  faced with his own impending death' that starts him on
  the path toward manufacturing meth. Pride is the
  catalyst that leads to all of Walter's other sins.
 
  Read more:
 
  'The Theology of Breaking Bad'
  http://www.fare-forward.com/the-theology-of-breaking-bad/




RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread authfriend













Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long
Richard, get this, which I am not making up: I first watched Twilight around 
the same time my landlords started making garlic infused oil in the third 
apartment of the house! Ok, I'm gonna do some research on Walking Dead because 
it definitely sounds like a very cool theme even though generally I'm not into 
horror shows. I think Twilight is tame compared to most. 





 From: Richard J. Williams pundits...@gmail.com
To: Richard J. Williams FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  
Now this is funny- a guy thinks a Twilight book is about sex between 
werewolves. 

Go figure.

If you enjoyed the Twilight movies you may want to check out AMC's
  The Walking Dead.

Based on the comic book series of the same name, AMC's The Walking
  Dead tells the 
story of a small group of survivors living in the aftermath of a
  zombie apocalypse. A
Golden Globe Award for Best Television Series, Drama.

The series follows a group of survivors, led by police officer
  Rick Grimes, who are traveling
in search of a safe and secure home. However, instead of the
  zombies, it is the living who 
remain that truly become the walking dead.

And guess what - The Walking Dead is not about zombies at all.
  LoL!

Read more:

'At AMC, Zombies Topple Network TV'
New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/

'The Walking Dead,' Like All Zombie Stories: ... Not About Zombies
  at All'
The Atlantic:
http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/

On 9/24/2013 7:27 AM, turquoiseb wrote:

  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:

 turq, I don't find the writing in the Twilight novels 
 that great. But I think it's a powerful retelling of 
 the archetypal story of love between an immortal and 
 a mortal, between God and human for us non atheists. 
 In this sense, it's a story of surrender and unity to 
 something greater than ourselves. Actually I think 
 most romantic love stories are, on the deepest level, 
 evoking the human yearning for unity with something 
 more complete than ourselves. Also with regards to 
 Twilight, perhaps a retelling of Beauty and the
  Beast, 
 another archetypal love story. Maybe it's not an 
 accident that the heroine is called Bella and the 
 hero Edward calls himself a monster. Hopefully the 
 archetypal aspects are also getting through to the 
 teen audiences.

I can hardly speak as an expert, having made my
way through the first novel only because someone
was begging me to. It was like pulling my own teeth.

I later found criticisms of it that echoed what I
was feeling as I read. FAR from archetypal or
mythic, I found it to be the literary counterpart
of those creepy clubs in high schools where they
talk guys and gals into wearing virginity rings.

It was the mindset of the 1950s, with vampires and
the dangers of getting close to them taking the 
place of the dangers of...uh...SEX. It was preaching 
sublimation, and resisting of natural desires, and 
trying to elevate those things as if they were noble 
and wonderful. I didn't feel that was an appropriate 
message for teenagers, so I wasn't a fan. 

But obviously, tastes vary. What surprises me about
the whole Twilight thang are the number of *older*
women who fixate on it. 

 
 From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 6:53 AM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking
  Bad
 
 
 
   
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote:
 
  Seraphita, I think both CS Lewis and the
  listener are right. 
  Continuing the food analogy, it's as if an
  essential nutrient 
  has been missing from the diet for a long time
  and now the 
  person is overindulging to make up for that
  deficit. But what 
  is the nutrient that's being so feverishly
  sought via the porn 
  industry? This helps me understand a little: my
  favorite 
  tantric teacher David Deida once said that to a
  straight man, 
  the female body is the most beautiful thing in
  the world. 
  Anyway, we women aren't hardwired the same
  visual way 
  but I think a parallel hunger in women shows up
  in the 
  popularity of romance novels and mushy love
  songs and 
  chick flicks. 
 
 As an example of the creative uses of context
  shifting I
 wrote about in my last post, this reminded me of a
  recent
 article quoting author Stephen King on the sad (in
  his eyes)
 popularity of tweenager porn.
 
 http://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/sep/21/stephen-king-twilight-tweenage-pornÂ
  
 
 I agree with him completely, at least about
  Twilight.




 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long
Jason, there are countries where men and women dress in very similar ways. But 
those countries don't seem very egalitarian to me!




 From: Jason jedi_sp...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:19 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  

Share, discrimination, bias, prejudices continue to exist on 
very subtle levels.  There are invisible glass ceilings.  It 
can take generations to wipe them out.

An unisex dress code (specialy for children) in public 
spaces, I believe can play a role in creating a truly 
egalitarian society.


 --- sharelong60 sharelong60@.. wrote:
 
 Jason, your comment about unisex dress code kind of jumped 
 out at me as did your linking that to an egalitarian 
 society. Actually I'm still kind of baffled by it so don't 
 even know what to ask except: can you say more?

  From: Jason jedi_spock@...
  
  The Chinese philosophy which speaks of Yin-Yang, two  
  equal energies mutually balancing each other is a far  
  superior philosophy to western philosophy and certain  
  aspects of indian philosophy.
  
  Science itself says that male and female are equals but 
  different.
  
  Yoga is essentialy balance, ie life within parameters.
  
  Any society or culture that is imbalanced will 
  eventually destroy itself.  Nature hates imbalances and 
  always tries to reach an equilibrium.  I have always  
  believed that an unisex dresscode in public spaces, is  
  an important way to bring in a truly egalitarian  
  society.
  
  If a republic is small, it is destroyed by a foreign  
  force; if it is large, it is destroyed by an internal  
  vice.
  
  ~French philosopher, Montesquieu
  

    --- s3raphita s3raphita@.. wrote:
   
   Ah, yes! C.S. Lewis and Mere Christianity. The book was 
   originally a series of talks Lewis gave on BBC Radio in 
   the 1940s. At one point he brought up the delicate topic 
   of sex. Lewis maintained that in his youth he had been all
   in favour of a naturalattitude towards sexual matters 
   but - he said - surely contemporary attitudes towards sex
   were anything but natural. There was something 
   positively diseased about them. As an example, Lewis asked
   us to consider a striptease show. What are we make of such
   an exhibition? Well, he said, imagine you had arrived in a
   strange country where you discovered that the inhabitants
   were in the habit of paying to gather in front of a 
   display of food that was hidden from view. Then, slowly, 
   the appetising meal was revealed to the gaze of the 
   citizens. Wouldn't you then conclude that something had
   gone seriously wrong with the appetites of the denizens of
   this imaginary nation? Well, isn't the same true of our 
   attitudes towards sex? We have a diseased approach, he 
   concluded.
   
   A listener to the programme later wrote in to say: if I 
   came across a country such as you describe I would assume
   that the people were starving. What a splendid response! 
   The implication being that men frequent strip shows 
   because they are sex-starved.
   
   Now take a look around you at the 24/7 porn culture we 
   inhabit. Was Lewis right or the anonymous listener?



  --- Pundister punditster@... wrote:
 
  In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis calls pride 'The Great
  Sin' for it 'has been the chief cause of misery in
  every nation and every family since the world began'¦ it
  was through Pride that the devil became the devil: Pride
  leads to every other vice.' We see in Walter' case that
  it is his pride' 'an unwillingness to accept normal
  treatment, a refusal to be a charity case even when
  faced with his own impending death' that starts him on 
  the path toward manufacturing meth. Pride is the 
  catalyst that leads to all of Walter's other sins.
 
  Read more:
 
  'The Theology of Breaking Bad'
  http://www.fare-forward.com/the-theology-of-breaking-bad/

 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long
Seraphita, are people more sex obsessed now than before? Or is it simply that 
there's more openness about the obsession now? As for Lewis, in Shadowlands he 
seems like a confirmed bachelor who had a rug pulled out from under his feet! 
I'm guessing he was pretty innocent about sex as well as being naive about the 
Catholic Church.





 From: s3raph...@yahoo.com s3raph...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:15 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  
Re I think both CS Lewis and the listener are right. Continuing the food 
analogy, it's as if an essential nutrient has been missing from the diet for a 
long time and now the person is overindulging to make up for that deficit.: 
yes, I think that's right. (Though the food analogy might break down if you 
consider those many millionaires who had starved in their youth. Though they 
later became fabulously rich they stayed tight-fisted to their dying day. One 
chap always used to have hard-boiled eggs on him so that he didn't find himself 
having to pay for a meal.) 

Someone might object, though, that the people over-indulging now aren't the 
people who were starving. The sixties' sex revolution was a long time ago. 
What's happened is that people now have sex on the brain. Thanks to mass 
media saturation sex has moved into our mental imaginary sphere and 
imaginations can't be limited as real-life experience is.

Lewis probably never saw that the rise of porn and SM culture, etc, owes a lot 
to the fact that Christianity made sex sinful. 


---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote:


Seraphita, I think both CS Lewis and the listener are right. Continuing the 
food analogy, it's as if an essential nutrient has been missing from the diet 
for a long time and now the person is overindulging to make up for that 
deficit. But what is the nutrient that's being so feverishly sought via the 
porn industry? This helps me understand a little: my favorite tantric teacher 
David Deida once said that to a straight man, the female body is the most 
beautiful thing in the world. Anyway, we women aren't hardwired the same visual 
way but I think a parallel hunger in women shows up in the popularity of 
romance novels and mushy love songs and chick flicks. This all reminds me of 
something I read once, sorry can't remember the author at the moment: that men 
need sex to feel love and women need to feel love to have sex. Seems like one 
of life's little jests.

PS I know about CS Lewis only from the movie Shadowlands, based on his life, 
specifically his marriage.




 From: s3raphita@... s3raphita@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:33 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  
Ah, yes! C.S. Lewis and Mere Christianity. The book was originally a series of 
talks Lewis gave on BBC Radio in the 1940s. At one point he brought up the 
delicate topic of sex. Lewis maintained that in his youth he had been all in 
favour of a naturalattitude towards sexual matters but - he said - surely 
contemporary attitudes towards sex were anything but natural. There was 
something positively diseased about them. As an example, Lewis asked us to 
consider a striptease show. What are we make of such an exhibition? Well, he 
said, imagine you had arrived in a strange country where you discovered that 
the inhabitants were in the habit of paying to gather in front of a display of 
food that was hidden from view. Then, slowly, the appetising meal was revealed 
to the gaze of the citizens. Wouldn't you then conclude that something had gone 
seriously wrong with the appetites of the denizens of this imaginary nation? 
Well, isn't the same true of our attitudes
 towards sex? We have a diseased approach, he concluded.

A listener to the programme later wrote in to say: if I came across a country 
such as you describe I would assume that the people were starving. What a 
splendid response! The implication being that men frequent strip shows because 
they are sex-starved.

Now take a look around you at the 24/7 porn culture we inhabit. Was Lewis right 
or the anonymous listener? 



--- In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote:


In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis calls pride “The Great Sin” for it 
“has been the chief cause of misery in every nation and every family 
since the world began… it was through Pride that the devil became the 
devil: Pride leads to every other vice.” We see in Walter’s case that it 
is his pride—an unwillingness to accept normal treatment, a refusal to 
be a charity case even when faced with his own impending death—that 
starts him on the path toward manufacturing meth. Pride is the catalyst 
that leads to all of Walter’s other sins.

Read more:

'The Theology of Breaking Bad'
http://www.fare-forward.com/the-theology-of-breaking-bad/


 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Steve Sundur
sign recently seen: if you don't sin, Jesus died for nothing
 


 From: Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
  
   
 
emptybill, some view Jesus and Christianity as a step in the evolution of 
religion. And a Pisces step at that. Agape. Unconditional love. Can seem sappy 
when compared to more robust expressions of love. OTOH, with regards to Adam 
and Eve there is a similar concept of oh happy fall. Meaning that if they had 
not fallen, Christ would not have incarnated. Still not as robust as Satan's 
willingness to be, out of his unconquerable love for God, separate from God FOR 
ALL ETERNITY. Surely he must know that God's embrace encompasses even that!

 


 From: emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:14 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
  
  
C.S. Lewis' quote - blah, blah, I'm so bad ...This is just an iteration of the 
old protestant/roman catholictheology of sin, guilt, redemption ... o god, o 
god, I know I done wrong but (gulf, gulp, sweat, sweat) now I wanna 
change.Such b.s. This distorted view of human nature/god's nature goes back to 
the sniveling confessions of Augustine of Hippo.However the pride of the evil 
one was much more colorfully described by Milton in Paradise Lost. However, 
Paradise Lost is just another iteration of the old theology.More interesting 
is the Sufi revelation ... that Lucifer fell from his exalted angelic station 
because he so ecstatically loved God that he refused God's command to bow down 
to God's own vicar ... the earthy Adam. The reason? He could worship no one 
other than his chosen deity, his Ishta Devatah ... yhvh. The consequence? Out 
of unconquerable love, he subsistsupon the last command of this true love  
be gone!The Sufi's insist this is
 a much closer to the truth of gnosis than the pathetic ... Won't you come to 
the weeping Jesusin your wickedly defiled heart? ... You stinking pile of 
filth!  
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis calls pride “The Great Sin” for it  “has been 
the chief cause of misery in every nation and every family  since the world 
began… it was through Pride that the devil became the  devil: Pride leads to 
every other vice.” We see in Walter’s case that it  is his pride—an 
unwillingness to accept normal treatment, a refusal to  be a charity case even 
when faced with his own impending death—that  starts him on the path toward 
manufacturing meth. Pride is the catalyst  that leads to all of Walter’s other 
sins.  Read more:  'The Theology of Breaking Bad' 
http://www.fare-forward.com/the-theology-of-breaking-bad/ 
 

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long
Steve, there are certain places in the US where I wouldn't drive with that on 
my car's bumper sticker! Was that sign by any chance in front of a gambling 
casino?!





 From: Steve Sundur steve.sun...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 


  
sign recently seen: if you don't sin, Jesus died for nothing

From: Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 
  
emptybill, some view Jesus and Christianity as a step in the evolution of 
religion. And a Pisces step at that. Agape. Unconditional love. Can seem sappy 
when compared to more robust expressions of love. OTOH, with regards to Adam 
and Eve there is a similar concept of oh happy fall. Meaning that if they had 
not fallen, Christ would not have incarnated. Still not as robust as Satan's 
willingness to be, out of his unconquerable love for God, separate from God FOR 
ALL ETERNITY. Surely he must know that God's embrace encompasses even that!


From: emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:14 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
 
  
C.S. Lewis' quote - blah, blah, I'm so bad ... This is just an iteration of the 
old protestant/roman catholic theology of sin, guilt, redemption ... o god, o 
god, I know I done wrong but (gulf, gulp, sweat, sweat) now I wanna change. 
Such b.s. This distorted view of human nature/god's nature goes back to the 
sniveling confessions of Augustine of Hippo. However the pride of the evil 
one was much more colorfully described by Milton in Paradise Lost. However, 
Paradise Lost is just another iteration of the old theology. More interesting 
is the Sufi revelation ... that Lucifer fell from his exalted angelic station 
because he so ecstatically loved God that he refused God's command to bow down 
to God's own vicar ... the earthy Adam. The reason? He could worship no one 
other than his chosen deity, his Ishta Devatah ... yhvh. The consequence? Out 
of unconquerable love, he subsists upon the last command of this true love  
be gone! The Sufi's insist
 this is a much closer to the truth of gnosis than the pathetic ... Won't you 
come to the weeping Jesus in your wickedly defiled heart? ... You stinking pile 
of filth!   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis calls pride “The Great Sin” for it 
“has been the chief cause of misery in every nation and every family 
since the world began… it was through Pride that the devil became the 
devil: Pride leads to every other vice.” We see in Walter’s case that it 
is his pride—an unwillingness to accept normal treatment, a refusal to 
be a charity case even when faced with his own impending death—that 
starts him on the path toward manufacturing meth. Pride is the catalyst 
that leads to all of Walter’s other sins.  Read more:  'The Theology of 
Breaking Bad' http://www.fare-forward.com/the-theology-of-breaking-bad/
 

[FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread s3raphita













Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-24 Thread Steve Sundur
actually my employee saw it over the weekend at a store called Gringo Jones 
near where he lives.  Gringo Jones is kind of a funky store.
 


 From: Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:20 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
  
   
 
Steve, there are certain places in the US where I wouldn't drive with that on 
my car's bumper sticker! Was that sign by any chance in front of a gambling 
casino?!

 


 From: Steve Sundur steve.sun...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
  
  
sign recently seen: if you don't sin, Jesus died for nothing
 


 From: Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
  
  
emptybill, some view Jesus and Christianity as a step in the evolution of 
religion. And a Pisces step at that. Agape. Unconditional love. Can seem sappy 
when compared to more robust expressions of love. OTOH, with regards to Adam 
and Eve there is a similar concept of oh happy fall. Meaning that if they had 
not fallen, Christ would not have incarnated. Still not as robust as Satan's 
willingness to be, out of his unconquerable love for God, separate from God FOR 
ALL ETERNITY. Surely he must know that God's embrace encompasses even that!

 


 From: emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:14 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad
  
  
C.S. Lewis' quote - blah, blah, I'm so bad ... This is just an iteration of the 
old protestant/roman catholic theology of sin, guilt, redemption ... o god, o 
god, I know I done wrong but (gulf, gulp, sweat, sweat) now I wanna change. 
Such b.s. This distorted view of human nature/god's nature goes back to the 
sniveling confessions of Augustine of Hippo. However the pride of the evil 
one was much more colorfully described by Milton in Paradise Lost. However, 
Paradise Lost is just another iteration of the old theology. More interesting 
is the Sufi revelation ... that Lucifer fell from his exalted angelic station 
because he so ecstatically loved God that he refused God's command to bow down 
to God's own vicar ... the earthy Adam. The reason? He could worship no one 
other than his chosen deity, his Ishta Devatah ... yhvh. The consequence? Out 
of unconquerable love, he subsists upon the last command of this true love  
be gone! The Sufi's insist
 this is a much closer to the truth of gnosis than the pathetic ... Won't you 
come to the weeping Jesus in your wickedly defiled heart? ... You stinking pile 
of filth!   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
In Mere Christianity, C.S. Lewis calls pride “The Great Sin” for it 
“has been the chief cause of misery in every nation and every family 
since the world began… it was through Pride that the devil became the 
devil: Pride leads to every other vice.” We see in Walter’s case that it 
is his pride—an unwillingness to accept normal treatment, a refusal to 
be a charity case even when faced with his own impending death—that 
starts him on the path toward manufacturing meth. Pride is the catalyst 
that leads to all of Walter’s other sins.  Read more:  'The Theology of 
Breaking Bad' http://www.fare-forward.com/the-theology-of-breaking-bad/ 

 

[FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-23 Thread emptybill













[FairfieldLife] RE: The Theology of Breaking Bad

2013-09-23 Thread s3raphita