Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wipe them out (Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact)
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: > > > Yikes, Richard! You've really given this a lot of thought. Even down to > the detail about sending ISIS leaders to work in ebola clinics. I'd say > those patients are already suffering enough! > > *Not to attend the sick, but to cremate the dead bodies.Someone has to do it.* > > Do you have an alternative plan? > > *The alternative plan is the final solution: nuke Mecca, with a threat to do the same to Medina. But I really think my plan is better - it's hard to field an army with no fuel or food when your life depends on a Toyota for a runner to get to a market.* > > > > On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 11:31 AM, "Richard Williams > pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]" > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com > [FairfieldLife] wrote: > > > John, I'm not sure that jihadists driven to such horrific acts will cave > in due to their own vileness. And certainly not in response to the world's > censure. They LIVE FOR that censure. imo. > > > > My plan would be to send in a thousand drones to wipe out their > infrastructure. First, disable all the tanks, jeeps, and Toyotas and then > hit their oil and fuel processing facilities and pipelines. Then, enforce a > no-drive zone on any highway or road in the entire ISIS-controlled areas. > > Without fuel, money coming in and no vehicles, it probably wouldn't take > six months before the rag heads all come out with their hands in the air > waving a white flag looking for a ride to a meal. > > Then, we would arrest all the leaders and hold them at Gitmo until they > get a NSA chip implanted in their forehead so we could track them anywhere > they go. Then, we would put the ISIS leaders to work in an ebola clinic for > the rest of their lives. > > If there were any objections and for some reason this plan failed, we > would then consider emptybll's final solution. > > > > > > On Monday, September 15, 2014 11:29 AM, "jr_...@yahoo.com > [FairfieldLife]" wrote: > > > > Jedi, > > That's too extreme. Non-combatants will be killed along with the hard > core criminals. I don't believe the world would accept that solution. > > The ISIS militants are already feeling the world opinion against their > ideology. They will eventually cave-in due to their own vileness. > > Once the Iraqi forces take back their towns and lands, ISIS will be > surrounded in their homeground in Syria by forces that are against them. > It's possible that Assad's forces could wipe them out first. > > If not, Obama could start bombing their weapons and equipment to further > degrade ISIS. But this could also create international furor for attacking > a sovereign land in Syria. Assad would complain, but he would be secretly > rejoicing in that the Americans are attacking his own enemy. > > > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : > > > > You want my advice? A single neutron bomb would be enough to > wipe them out. The infrastructure will remain intact. > > These people are savage bandits. There is no other way out > of this. > > > --- wrote : > > Actually it would be easier for the Iraqi forces to retake the towns that > the ISIS militants have occupied after the US bombs the ISIS equipment, > weapons and stronghold. > > However, it's another scenario in Syria itself. At this time, I would > assume Assad's forces are more likely to finish the job after the US bombs > the ISIS stronghold, equipment and weapons. If they don't, the so-called > friendly militants would take control and Assad's power will more likely be > degraded. > > The soldiers that are flying the drones can see fairly well through the > cameras from as far as 5 to 6 miles away. They can pick out enemy > combatants. > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wipe them out (Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact)
Yikes, Richard! You've really given this a lot of thought. Even down to the detail about sending ISIS leaders to work in ebola clinics. I'd say those patients are already suffering enough! Do you have an alternative plan? On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 11:31 AM, "Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]" wrote: On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: > >John, I'm not sure that jihadists driven to such horrific acts will cave in >due to their own vileness. And certainly not in response to the world's >censure. They LIVE FOR that censure. imo. > > My plan would be to send in a thousand drones to wipe out their infrastructure. First, disable all the tanks, jeeps, and Toyotas and then hit their oil and fuel processing facilities and pipelines. Then, enforce a no-drive zone on any highway or road in the entire ISIS-controlled areas. Without fuel, money coming in and no vehicles, it probably wouldn't take six months before the rag heads all come out with their hands in the air waving a white flag looking for a ride to a meal. Then, we would arrest all the leaders and hold them at Gitmo until they get a NSA chip implanted in their forehead so we could track them anywhere they go. Then, we would put the ISIS leaders to work in an ebola clinic for the rest of their lives. If there were any objections and for some reason this plan failed, we would then consider emptybll's final solution. > > > >On Monday, September 15, 2014 11:29 AM, "jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" > wrote: > > > > >Jedi, > > >That's too extreme. Non-combatants will be killed along with the hard core >criminals. I don't believe the world would accept that solution. > > >The ISIS militants are already feeling the world opinion against their >ideology. They will eventually cave-in due to their own vileness. > > >Once the Iraqi forces take back their towns and lands, ISIS will be surrounded >in their homeground in Syria by forces that are against them. It's possible >that Assad's forces could wipe them out first. > > >If not, Obama could start bombing their weapons and equipment to further >degrade ISIS. But this could also create international furor for attacking a >sovereign land in Syria. Assad would complain, but he would be secretly >rejoicing in that the Americans are attacking his own enemy. > > > >---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : > > > > > >You want my advice? A single neutron bomb would be enough to >wipe them out. The infrastructure will remain intact. > >These people are savage bandits. There is no other way out >of this. > > >--- wrote : > > >Actually it would be easier for the Iraqi forces to retake the towns that the >ISIS militants have occupied after the US bombs the ISIS equipment, weapons >and stronghold. > > >However, it's another scenario in Syria itself. At this time, I would assume >Assad's forces are more likely to finish the job after the US bombs the ISIS >stronghold, equipment and weapons. If they don't, the so-called friendly >militants would take control and Assad's power will more likely be degraded. > >The soldiers that are flying the drones can see fairly well through the cameras from as far as 5 to 6 miles away. They can pick out enemy combatants. > > > > > >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wipe them out (Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact)
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: > > > John, I'm not sure that jihadists driven to such horrific acts will cave > in due to their own vileness. And certainly not in response to the world's > censure. They LIVE FOR that censure. imo. > > My plan would be to send in a thousand drones to wipe out their infrastructure. First, disable all the tanks, jeeps, and Toyotas and then hit their oil and fuel processing facilities and pipelines. Then, enforce a no-drive zone on any highway or road in the entire ISIS-controlled areas. Without fuel, money coming in and no vehicles, it probably wouldn't take six months before the rag heads all come out with their hands in the air waving a white flag looking for a ride to a meal. Then, we would arrest all the leaders and hold them at Gitmo until they get a NSA chip implanted in their forehead so we could track them anywhere they go. Then, we would put the ISIS leaders to work in an ebola clinic for the rest of their lives. If there were any objections and for some reason this plan failed, we would then consider emptybll's final solution. > > > > On Monday, September 15, 2014 11:29 AM, "jr_...@yahoo.com > [FairfieldLife]" wrote: > > > > Jedi, > > That's too extreme. Non-combatants will be killed along with the hard > core criminals. I don't believe the world would accept that solution. > > The ISIS militants are already feeling the world opinion against their > ideology. They will eventually cave-in due to their own vileness. > > Once the Iraqi forces take back their towns and lands, ISIS will be > surrounded in their homeground in Syria by forces that are against them. > It's possible that Assad's forces could wipe them out first. > > If not, Obama could start bombing their weapons and equipment to further > degrade ISIS. But this could also create international furor for attacking > a sovereign land in Syria. Assad would complain, but he would be secretly > rejoicing in that the Americans are attacking his own enemy. > > > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : > > > > You want my advice? A single neutron bomb would be enough to > wipe them out. The infrastructure will remain intact. > > These people are savage bandits. There is no other way out > of this. > > > --- wrote : > > Actually it would be easier for the Iraqi forces to retake the towns that > the ISIS militants have occupied after the US bombs the ISIS equipment, > weapons and stronghold. > > However, it's another scenario in Syria itself. At this time, I would > assume Assad's forces are more likely to finish the job after the US bombs > the ISIS stronghold, equipment and weapons. If they don't, the so-called > friendly militants would take control and Assad's power will more likely be > degraded. > > The soldiers that are flying the drones can see fairly well through the > cameras from as far as 5 to 6 miles away. They can pick out enemy > combatants. > > > > > > >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wipe them out (Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact)
Share, You're correct. That's precisely why the world, including the USA, has no choice but to crush them with violence in equal or greater measure to stop their evil acts. I don't believe the Maharishi Effect can influence ISIS because their ideology and actions are inherently vile and evil. It is common knowledge that the truth about a person can be known by the actions he or she takes. As such, the militants' barbaric execution of innocent people only shows that they're not for peace but for evil dominion. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : John, I'm not sure that jihadists driven to such horrific acts will cave in due to their own vileness. And certainly not in response to the world's censure. They LIVE FOR that censure. imo. On Monday, September 15, 2014 11:29 AM, "jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife]" wrote: Jedi, That's too extreme. Non-combatants will be killed along with the hard core criminals. I don't believe the world would accept that solution. The ISIS militants are already feeling the world opinion against their ideology. They will eventually cave-in due to their own vileness. Once the Iraqi forces take back their towns and lands, ISIS will be surrounded in their homeground in Syria by forces that are against them. It's possible that Assad's forces could wipe them out first. If not, Obama could start bombing their weapons and equipment to further degrade ISIS. But this could also create international furor for attacking a sovereign land in Syria. Assad would complain, but he would be secretly rejoicing in that the Americans are attacking his own enemy. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : You want my advice? A single neutron bomb would be enough to wipe them out. The infrastructure will remain intact. These people are savage bandits. There is no other way out of this. --- wrote : Actually it would be easier for the Iraqi forces to retake the towns that the ISIS militants have occupied after the US bombs the ISIS equipment, weapons and stronghold. However, it's another scenario in Syria itself. At this time, I would assume Assad's forces are more likely to finish the job after the US bombs the ISIS stronghold, equipment and weapons. If they don't, the so-called friendly militants would take control and Assad's power will more likely be degraded. The soldiers that are flying the drones can see fairly well through the cameras from as far as 5 to 6 miles away. They can pick out enemy combatants.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wipe them out (Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact)
John, I'm not sure that jihadists driven to such horrific acts will cave in due to their own vileness. And certainly not in response to the world's censure. They LIVE FOR that censure. imo. On Monday, September 15, 2014 11:29 AM, "jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]" wrote: Jedi, That's too extreme. Non-combatants will be killed along with the hard core criminals. I don't believe the world would accept that solution. The ISIS militants are already feeling the world opinion against their ideology. They will eventually cave-in due to their own vileness. Once the Iraqi forces take back their towns and lands, ISIS will be surrounded in their homeground in Syria by forces that are against them. It's possible that Assad's forces could wipe them out first. If not, Obama could start bombing their weapons and equipment to further degrade ISIS. But this could also create international furor for attacking a sovereign land in Syria. Assad would complain, but he would be secretly rejoicing in that the Americans are attacking his own enemy. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : You want my advice? A single neutron bomb would be enough to wipe them out. The infrastructure will remain intact. These people are savage bandits. There is no other way out of this. --- wrote : Actually it would be easier for the Iraqi forces to retake the towns that the ISIS militants have occupied after the US bombs the ISIS equipment, weapons and stronghold. However, it's another scenario in Syria itself. At this time, I would assume Assad's forces are more likely to finish the job after the US bombs the ISIS stronghold, equipment and weapons. If they don't, the so-called friendly militants would take control and Assad's power will more likely be degraded. The soldiers that are flying the drones can see fairly well through the cameras from as far as 5 to 6 miles away. They can pick out enemy combatants.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Wipe them out (Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact)
Jedi, That's too extreme. Non-combatants will be killed along with the hard core criminals. I don't believe the world would accept that solution. The ISIS militants are already feeling the world opinion against their ideology. They will eventually cave-in due to their own vileness. Once the Iraqi forces take back their towns and lands, ISIS will be surrounded in their homeground in Syria by forces that are against them. It's possible that Assad's forces could wipe them out first. If not, Obama could start bombing their weapons and equipment to further degrade ISIS. But this could also create international furor for attacking a sovereign land in Syria. Assad would complain, but he would be secretly rejoicing in that the Americans are attacking his own enemy. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote : You want my advice? A single neutron bomb would be enough to wipe them out. The infrastructure will remain intact. These people are savage bandits. There is no other way out of this. --- wrote : Actually it would be easier for the Iraqi forces to retake the towns that the ISIS militants have occupied after the US bombs the ISIS equipment, weapons and stronghold. However, it's another scenario in Syria itself. At this time, I would assume Assad's forces are more likely to finish the job after the US bombs the ISIS stronghold, equipment and weapons. If they don't, the so-called friendly militants would take control and Assad's power will more likely be degraded. The soldiers that are flying the drones can see fairly well through the cameras from as far as 5 to 6 miles away. They can pick out enemy combatants.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wipe them out (Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8Y-9YSBB9sExcellent Idea! Watch this. On Monday, September 15, 2014 6:10 AM, "Richard Williams pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]" wrote: There would be too much collateral damage in that scenario. So, I prefer my solution - destroy the infrastructure such as oil transport facilities, trucks, jeeps, tanks and all Toyota 4-Runners. Send in drones that pick off the leaders one-by-one, over time. Since it's a desert, there's really no place to hide and when you run, everyone can see you. It was a really bad idea for the leaders of ISIS to pick northern Iraq for their headquarters. They did a really stupid and bad thing - and now they will be destroyed by U.S. and allied air-power. Only the U.S. has the firepower to bring down ISIS - nobody else on the planet has the guts, enough money and ammunition, or the logistics to get the job done. The real problem is the U.S. Congress and the funding. Another problem is the alliance - nobody wants to send in boots on the ground. > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:51 AM, jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: > >You want my advice? A single neutron bomb would be enough to > >wipe them out. The infrastructure will remain intact. > >These people are savage bandits. There is no other way out >of this. > > >--- wrote : > > >Actually it would be easier for the Iraqi forces to retake the towns that the >ISIS militants have occupied after the US bombs the ISIS equipment, weapons >and stronghold. > > >However, it's another scenario in Syria itself. At this time, I would assume >Assad's forces are more likely to finish the job after the US bombs the ISIS >stronghold, equipment and weapons. If they don't, the so-called friendly >militants would take control and Assad's power will more likely be degraded. > >The soldiers that are flying the drones can see fairly well through the cameras from as far as 5 to 6 miles away. They can pick out enemy combatants. > > > >
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Wipe them out (Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact)
There would be too much collateral damage in that scenario. So, I prefer my solution - destroy the infrastructure such as oil transport facilities, trucks, jeeps, tanks and all Toyota 4-Runners. Send in drones that pick off the leaders one-by-one, over time. Since it's a desert, there's really no place to hide and when you run, everyone can see you. It was a really bad idea for the leaders of ISIS to pick northern Iraq for their headquarters. They did a really stupid and bad thing - and now they will be destroyed by U.S. and allied air-power. Only the U.S. has the firepower to bring down ISIS - nobody else on the planet has the guts, enough money and ammunition, or the logistics to get the job done. The real problem is the U.S. Congress and the funding. Another problem is the alliance - nobody wants to send in boots on the ground. > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:51 AM, jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] < FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > > You want my advice? A single neutron bomb would be enough to > wipe them out. The infrastructure will remain intact. > > These people are savage bandits. There is no other way out > of this. > > > --- wrote : > > Actually it would be easier for the Iraqi forces to retake the towns that > the ISIS militants have occupied after the US bombs the ISIS equipment, > weapons and stronghold. > > However, it's another scenario in Syria itself. At this time, I would > assume Assad's forces are more likely to finish the job after the US bombs > the ISIS stronghold, equipment and weapons. If they don't, the so-called > friendly militants would take control and Assad's power will more likely be > degraded. > > The soldiers that are flying the drones can see fairly well through the > cameras from as far as 5 to 6 miles away. They can pick out enemy > combatants. > > > > > >
[FairfieldLife] Re: Wipe them out (Syrian Rebels, IS in a Pact)
You want my advice? A single neutron bomb would be enough to wipe them out. The infrastructure will remain intact. These people are savage bandits. There is no other way out of this. --- wrote : Actually it would be easier for the Iraqi forces to retake the towns that the ISIS militants have occupied after the US bombs the ISIS equipment, weapons and stronghold. However, it's another scenario in Syria itself. At this time, I would assume Assad's forces are more likely to finish the job after the US bombs the ISIS stronghold, equipment and weapons. If they don't, the so-called friendly militants would take control and Assad's power will more likely be degraded. The soldiers that are flying the drones can see fairly well through the cameras from as far as 5 to 6 miles away. They can pick out enemy combatants.
