On Jul 18, 2012, at 11:41 AM, Share Long wrote:
If the Tao is really the Tao, how could it possibly ALWAYS be
barred to the sentimental?
Because the sentimental cling to preferences...otherwise they
wouldn't be sentimental...
But that sounds like sentimentality is more powerful than Tao!
From: Vaj vajradh...@earthlink.net
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank
Maharishi to Vaj
On Jul 18, 2012, at 12:05 PM, Share Long wrote:
But that sounds like sentimentality is more powerful than Tao!
Perhaps charm is in the eyes of the beholder?
Perhaps the Tao too?! Very crowded eye ball (-:
From: Vaj vajradh...@earthlink.net
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: for those who still love and or thank
Maharishi to Vaj
On Jul
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:
But that sounds like sentimentality is more powerful than Tao!
I think Vaj means that the sentimental don't get the Tao,
not that the Tao doesn't get them.
Of course, this implies that *Vaj* gets the Tao, so one
might want
