[FairfieldLife] Response to MDixon - Re: Herbert

2007-09-26 Thread oneradiantbeing
MDixon wrote: Bob Hebert doesn't bother to tell us what the 
Constitution says about Washington D.C. having elected representatives 
and Senators.

DS responds: What the Constitution says in Sec. 8 is that the Congress 
possesses power to legislate for the District of Columbia and what the 
size of this district should be limited to. Bob Herbert wrote that 
Congress failed to legislate (pass laws) for the people of DC to have 
their own elected Representatives in the House and also the right to 
vote. How do you feel about the fact that these people (mostly Black 
people) cannot vote except in presidential elections and yet they pay 
taxes to the U.S. government just like everybody else? Here is a 
quotation right from Sec. 8 of the US Constitution: Peace, DS 

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such 
District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of 
particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of 
the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority 
over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the 
State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, 
Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

In a message dated 9/26/07 5:31:09 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Last week, the residents of Washington, D.C., with its 
 majority black population, came remarkably close to realizing a 
goal 
 they have sought for decades - a voting member of Congress to 
 represent them.
 
 A majority in Congress favored the move, and the House had 
 already approved it. But the Republican minority in the Senate - 
with 
 the enthusiastic support of President Bush - rose up on Tuesday 
and 
 said: No way, baby.





Re: [FairfieldLife] Response to MDixon - Re: Herbert

2007-09-26 Thread MDixon6569
 
In a message dated 9/26/07 3:46:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Bob Herbert wrote that 
Congress failed to legislate (pass  laws) for the people of DC to have 
their own elected Representatives in  the House and also the right to 
vote.


 
In _1961_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1961) , the _Twenty-third  Amendment 
to the United States Constitution_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-third_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution)
  was ratified, allowing District  
residents to vote for president and vice president. This right has been  
exercised by D.C. citizens since the _election  of 1964_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election,_1964) . 
In _1978_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1978) , Congress  passed on to the 
states another constitutional amendment, the _District  of Columbia Voting 
Rights Amendment_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_Voting_Rights_Amendment) , 
which would have given the District its  own voting members of 
Congress, making it virtually a state. However, a  seven-year time limit was 
placed on the amendment, which was subsequently _ratified_ 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratification)   by only 16 of the states, far 
short of the 
three-quarters (currently 38)  required for it to be ratified.



** See what's new at http://www.aol.com